#also known as PFOA

[rjzimmerman]

Excerpt from this New York Times story:

The Biden administration is designating two “forever chemicals,” man-made compounds that are linked to serious health risks, as hazardous substances under the Superfund law, shifting responsibility for their cleanup to polluters from taxpayers.

The new rule announced on Friday empowers the government to force the many companies that manufacture or use perfluorooctanoic acid, also known as PFOA, and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid, known as PFOS, to monitor any releases into the environment and be responsible for cleaning them up. Those companies could face billions of dollars in liabilities.

The pair of compounds are part of a larger family of chemical substances known collectively as PFAS.

The compounds, found in everything from dental floss to firefighting foams to children’s toys, are called forever chemicals because they degrade very slowly and can accumulate in the body and the environment. Exposure to PFAS has been associated with metabolic disorders, decreased fertility in women, developmental delays in children and increased risk of some prostate, kidney and testicular cancers, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.

The chemicals are so ubiquitous that they can be detected in the blood of almost every person in the United States. One recent government study discovered PFAS chemicals in nearly half of the nation’s tap water. In 2022, the E.P.A. found the chemicals could cause harm at levels “much lower than previously understood” and that almost no level of exposure was safe.

The announcement follows an extraordinary move last week from the E.P.A. mandating that water utilities reduce the PFAS in drinking water to near-zero levels. The agency has also proposed to designate seven additional PFAS chemicals as hazardous waste.

[3liza]

Hello please could you send me a link to the recent researches you mentioned about teflon being dangerous at normal cooking conditions I'm really interested and they seem hard to find thank you

At normal cooking tempera- tures, PTFE-coated cookware releases various gases and chemicals that present mild to severe toxicity. Only few stud- ies describe the toxicity of PTFE but without solid conclu- sions. The toxicity and fate of ingested PTFE coatings are also not understood. Moreover, the emerging, persistent, and well- known toxic environmental pollutant PFOA is also used in the synthesis of PTFA. There are some reports where PFOA was detected in the gas phase released from the cooking utensils under normal cooking temperatures. Due to toxicity concerns, PFOA has been replaced with other chemicals such as GenX, but these new alternatives are also suspected to have similar toxicity. [...]

While in another report, PFOA was reported to release into the gas phase at 7–337 ng (11–503 pg/cm2) per pan from four brands of nonstick frying pans under normal cooking temperatures (179 to 233 °C surface temperature). After repeated use, one brand showed a significant decrease in gas-phase PFOA, whereas with other brands, there was no significant decline in gas phase PFOA. This study suggested that residual PFOA is not completely removed during the fabrication process of the nonstick coating for cookware. These residuals remain on the surface and may be off-gassed when heated at normal cooking temperatures (Ewan et al. 2007).

teflon/PTFE/PTFA/PFOA type chemicals are going to be the asbestos/lead/cigarettes of our generation probably, but worse because it is affecting the global climate and ecology web and not just poisoning people in their cars and houses. just a massive, massive coverup that has been going on for decades at this point and with consequences that are basically inescapable. you already have teflon in your organs and blood and bones and so do i. limiting further exposure is probably a good idea but i dont think we have longitudinal studies yet on "mortality of people who cooked on teflon for 40 years vs people who didnt" so we just dont know.

sorry to be a doomer and sorry to trigger anyone's contamination ocd but this is one of those things where it potentially may not be helpful to sugar-coat the information

[olowan-waphiya]

of fucking course.....they fucking coated paper straws with pfas......its a fucking nightmare

--

Long-lasting 'forever chemicals', which can cause damaging health issues, found in 18/20 brands of paper straws

In the first analysis of its kind in Europe, and only the second in the world, Belgian researchers tested 39 brands of straws for the group of synthetic chemicals known as poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

PFAS were found in the majority of the straws tested and were most common in those made from paper and bamboo, the study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Food Additives and Contaminants, found.

PFAS are used to make everyday products, from outdoor clothing to non-stick pans, resistant to water, heat and stains. They are, however, potentially harmful to people, wildlife and the environment.

They break down very slowly over time and can persist over thousands of years in the environment, a property that has led to them being known as "forever chemicals."

They have been associated with a number of health problems, including lower response to vaccines, lower birth weight, thyroid disease, increased cholesterol levels, liver damage, kidney cancer and testicular cancer.

"Straws made from plant-based materials, such as paper and bamboo, are often advertised as being more sustainable and eco-friendly than those made from plastic," says researcher Dr Thimo Groffen, an environmental scientist at the University of Antwerp, who is involved in this study.

"However, the presence of PFAS in these straws means that's not necessarily true."

A growing number of countries, including the UK and Belgium, have banned sale of single-use plastic products, including drinking straws, and plant-based versions have become popular alternatives.

A recent study found PFAS in plant-based drinking straws in the US. Dr Groffen and colleagues wanted to find out if the same was true of those on sale in Belgium.

To explore this further, the research team purchased 39 different brands of drinking straw made from five materials -- paper, bamboo, glass, stainless steel and plastic.

The straws, which were mainly obtained from shops, supermarkets and fast-food restaurants, then underwent two rounds of testing for PFAS.

The majority of the brands (27/39, 69%) contained PFAS, with 18 different PFAS detected in total.

The paper straws were most likely to contain PFAS, with the chemicals detected in 18/20 (90%) of the brands tested. PFAS were also detected in 4/5 (80%) brands of bamboo straw, 3/4 (75%) of the plastic straw brands and 2/5 (40%) brands of glass straw. They were not detected in any of the five types of steel straw tested.

The most commonly found PFAS, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), has been banned globally since 2020.

Also detected were trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (TFMS), "ultra-short chain" PFAS which are highly water soluble and so might leach out of straws into drinks.

The PFAS concentrations were low and, bearing in mind that most people tend to only use straws occasionally, pose a limited risk to human health. However, PFAS can remain in the body for many years and concentrations can build up over time.

"Small amounts of PFAS, while not harmful in themselves, can add to the chemical load already present in the body," says Dr Groffen.

It isn't known whether the PFAS were added to the straws by the manufacturers for waterproofing or whether were the result of contamination. Potential sources of contamination include the soil the plant-based materials were grown in and the water used in the manufacturing process.

However, the presence of the chemicals in almost every brand of paper straw means it is likely that it was, in some cases, being used as a water-repellent coating, say the researchers.

The study's other limitations include not looking at whether the PFAS would leach out of the straws into liquids.

Dr Groffen concludes: "The presence of PFAS in paper and bamboo straws shows they are not necessarily biodegradable.

"We did not detect any PFAS in stainless steel straws, so I would advise consumers to use this type of straw -- or just avoid using straws at all."

[luulapants]

"Free of PFOA and PFOS!"

Just so everyone is aware, if you see this advertised on any product (cookware, period underwear, outdoor gear, etc), usually it means that the manufacturer is using a different PFAS chemical that is just as dangerous but hasn't had a call-out post yet. There are thousands (millions according to some sources) of possible PFAS chemicals and they are all thought to be dangerous to humans and the planet. So when PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) gets put on the shit list, a company can just shift to PFNA (perfluorononanoic acid) or PFHpA (perfluoroheptanoic acid) and declare themselves PFOA-free.

These chemicals are characterized by these long carbon-fluorine chains. They're called "forever chemicals" because the carbon-fluorine bond is incredibly strong and doesn't easily break down, meaning they're a contaminant that builds up in the environment. That chain is also hydrophobic, meaning it repels water, which makes PFAS incredible nonstick, waterproofing, or fire suppressant chemicals. And companies will not stop making them until the entire category is outlaws or people stop buying them, and people won't stop buying them if they don't realize they're buying them, which means companies have a great incentive to be shady as hell about them.

So you can look for products that say they contain no PFAS compounds because that covers the entire category. Except companies aren't actually required to disclose any of this shit and a disreputable company shipping products in from overseas could just lie about that, and the chances of them being caught are low and the chances of them facing consequences other than closing up one Amazon account and moving to another are even lower. So just assume that products that have contained those compounds in the past, if they still function the way they used to, contain another PFAS. "Proprietary nonstick compound"? PFAS. "Newly formulated PFOS-free period underwear"? PFAS.

I was prompted to write this because I saw a whole write-up on the TomboyX website about this. If you want to see my breakdown on their statement, look below the cut.

The following are excerpts from this portion of the TomboyX website describing their period underwear:

Two significant corrections here. The estimates for the number of chemicals in the category of PFAS is somewhere between 4,730 (according to the OECD) and 6 million (per the NCBI). Not all of those have been linked to health issues because not all of those have been studied. Every single one that has been studied has been found to be dangerous to human health. The level of concentration for health impacts may vary, but they're all pretty darn low. We have no reason to believe that any chemical in this family is not dangerous to human health.

There's a lot going on here. First off, I want to say that this is all pretty typical for a self-regulating industry like textiles. Oeko-Tex is a for-profit third-party certification company which controls and owns its own standards, and the actual list of 100 chemicals known to be toxic to humans is not publicly listed on their website. We don't know how many PFAS compounds are "included" in that list, but if I had to guess, it's no more than 5, which explains why TomboyX claimed there were only hundreds of PFAS. "100 chemicals including PFAS compounds" out of hundreds of possible PFAS sounds a lot better than "a few compounds out of 6 million."

That they had an independent laboratory test their materials for PFAS does seem like an extra step, but it actually makes me more concerned. First of all, that laboratory would only have a very small set of PFAS compounds they test for, most likely, and was probably testing for the same ones covered by the Oeko-Tex certification. Second, why would they need to determine that through a test and not by, y'know, checking their own purchase records? It's because they're not creating their own fabrics and their fabric suppliers haven't shared their formulations with TomboyX. That means they don't actually know what's in those fabrics nor do they have an excess of control over their content. Visiting their factories doesn't mean that much if the formulations are confidential from them. Again, that's not unusual, but they're giving the impression that they have a lot more control over their fabric composition than they probably actually do.

They're correct that they've gone beyond the norm in investigating this sort of thing, but the fact is that the bar is so, so low.

So let's take a practical look at the likelihood that there are PFAS in these panties. The moisture-wicking twill and absorbent terry cloth are not risky - those are things those materials do naturally. However, cotton is not naturally water-resistant at all. It absorbs moisture like crazy. That means the cotton has been treated with something, and that something is probably a PFAS compound.

This is the second time they've used this phrase "PFAS commonly used in clothing production," and I think it's important to note that we are currently in a big transition where companies are shifting to a bunch of different, less-common compounds because of the sudden focus and pressure on PFAS. Manufacturers know which compounds people are going to test for, and it's not that difficult to shift to a different one.

Am I going to buy these panties? Absolutely not. Do I think TomboyX is somehow malicious in their manufacturing? It's hard to say. They're right, they're not "knowingly" producing a harmful product, but there's an element of plausible deniability there, right? They can know that PFAS are really the only compounds used to waterproof cotton but also say "hey, we tested this stuff for everything the labs test it for, and it's clean!" On the other hand, they're right that this is probably the safest and highest quality material available for this specific purpose. Some company out there is probably doing some great out-of-the-box thinking and figuring out how to add a layer of latex to period panties or something like that, but for the time being, these fabric reusable pads and panties are inevitably going to use PFAS.

[reasoningdaily]

The Associated Press: 22 attorneys general oppose 3M settlement over water systems contamination with 'forever chemicals'

TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. (AP) — Twenty-two attorneys general urged a federal court Wednesday to reject a proposed $10.3 billion settlement over contamination of U.S. public drinking water systems with potentially dangerous chemicals, saying it lets manufacturer 3M Co. off too easily.

The deal announced in June doesn’t give individual water suppliers enough time to determine how much money they would get and whether it would cover their costs of removing the compounds known collectively as PFAS, said the officials with 19 states, Washington, D.C., and two territories. In some cases the agreement could shift liability from the company to providers, they said.

“While I appreciate the effort that went into it, the proposed settlement in its current form does not adequately account for the pernicious damage that 3M has done in so many of our communities,” said California Attorney General Rob Bonta, leader of the multistate coalition.

3M spokesman Sean Lynch said the agreement “will benefit U.S.-based public water systems nationwide that provide drinking water to a vast majority of Americans” without further litigation.

“It is not unusual for there to be objections regarding significant settlement agreements,” Lynch said. “We will continue to work cooperatively to address questions about the terms of the resolution.”

The company, based in St. Paul, Minnesota, manufactures per- and polyfluorinated substances — a broad class of chemicals used in nonstick, water- and grease-resistant products such as clothing and cookware, as well as some firefighting foams.

Described as “forever chemicals” because they don’t degrade naturally in the environment, PFAS have been linked to a variety of health problems, including liver and immune-system damage and some cancers.

3M has said it plans to stop making them by the end of 2025.

Some 300 communities have sued 3M and other companies over water pollution from the compounds. A number of states, airports, firefighter training facilities and private well owners also have pending cases.

They have been consolidated in U.S. District Court in Charleston, South Carolina, where the proposed settlement was filed last month.

Although the company put its value at $10.3 billion, an attorney for the water providers said it could reach as high as $12.5 billion, depending on how many detect PFAS during testing the Environmental Protection Agency has ordered over the next three years.

The law firm representing the water providers did not immediately respond Wednesday to messages seeking comment.

EPA in March proposed strict limits on two common types, PFOA and PFOS, and said it wanted to regulate four others.

In addition to California, states urging Judge Richard Gergel to reject the deal included Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont and Wisconsin. Also opposed were Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico and the Northern Mariana Islands.

In a court filing, the attorneys general said it would force nearly all public water providers nationwide to participate unless they withdraw individually — even those that haven’t filed suits or tested for PFAS.

“Troublingly, they would have to make their opt-out decisions without knowing how much they would actually receive and, in many cases, before knowing the extent of contamination in their water supplies and the cost of remediating it,” the officials said in a statement.

A provision in the proposed deal would shift liability from 3M to water suppliers that don’t opt out, the statement said. That could enable the company to seek compensation from providers if sued over cancer or other illnesses in PFAS-affected communities, it said.

“As such, the proposed settlement is worth far less than the advertised $10.5 billion to $12.5 billion,” the attorneys general said.

The attorneys general did not take a position on a separate $1.18 billion deal to resolve PFAS complaints against DuPont de Nemours Inc. and spinoffs Chemours Co. and Corteva Inc.

[eaglesnick]

Second Rate Britain 3

Everyone knows that the predominantly foreign-owned water companies in the UK discharge millions of tonnes of untreated sewage into our national water system and onto our beaches, while issuing huge bonuses to their CEO's and massive profits to their shareholders. But, despite the catastrophic effect this has on our environment, we can at least avoiding nose-to-nose contact with human waste  if we refrain from swimming in our rivers or visiting the coast.

When it comes to the dangers lurking in our drinking water we have no such options, and according to some reports we are being slowly poisoned. In particular it is our children and developing foetuses who are most at risk.

“UK ‘flying blind’ on levels of toxic chemicals in tap water"  (Guardian 25/03/21)

British drinking water, like many water supplies across the world, is contaminated by a group of chemicals known collectively as PFAS.  They are also known as “forever chemicals” as they do not break down in the environment. These chemicals - over 4000 of them - have been linked to a number of illnesses:

 “...testicular cancer, thyroid disease, ulcerative colitis, high cholesterol and pregnancy-induced hypertension. PFOS has been associated with reproductive, developmental, liver, kidney, and thyroid disease. At lower levels PFAS have been associated with immunotoxicity." (Guardian 23/02/23)

These chemicals have been found in 17,000 sites across the UK. The Drinking Water Inspectorate’s guidelines state that at concentrations above 100 ng/1 water companies should take action to reduce PFAS before supplying water to people’s homes.  But the level of 100ng/l is below that recommended as safe in the EU.

“A BBC study found PFAS levels exceeded European safety levels in almost half of the samples taken. However, none exceeded the current safety level in England and Wales.” BBC News: 19/03/23)

I’m not sure that those who voted for leaving the EU really did so to allow the UK government to sanction dangerously high levels of contaminants in our drinking water. The EU safety standard is 2.2ng/l, the UK standard is 100ng/l, a level almost 50 times higher.

In Denmark, the level of permitted PFAs is even smaller than that for the EU.

 “…the Danish Environmental Protection Agency announced that drinking water must not contain more than maximum two nanograms per litre of the total sum of the following four PFAS substances: PFOA, PFOS, PFNA and PFHxS."  (tox.dhi.dk: 07/23/21)

In the US:

“The US Environmental Protection Agency has taken the extraordinary step of setting legal drinking water limits for six of the most studied and toxic PFAS compounds, known commonly as “forever chemicals”, that are at the center of an ongoing environmental crisis." (Guardian: 14/03/23)

In Britain the government has issued a paper titled “PFAS and Forever Chemicals" in which they state:

“Water companies have a duty to ensure water is wholesome. There are currently no statutory standards for PFAS in drinking water England and Wales.” (dwi.gov.uk : 2022)

Although the UK does not have “statutory standards” for PFAS in our drinking water, the Drinking Water Inspectorate did offer “guidelines” to the water companies. While scientists warn that allowable levels of toxic PFAS in UK drinking water are too high (BBC News:19/03/23) the Drinking Water Inspectorate says

“A few companies have detected traces of PFAS in some source waters, although the monitoring data shows the large majority of sources are not affected. Water supplies are made safe through a combination of treatment processes and managed dilution through blending, to achieve stringent regulatory standards, before reaching the consumers tap.” (dwi.gov.uk : 2022)

What this means is practice is that water companies are legally allowed to dilute the poisonous “forever" chemicals with uncontaminated water. They do not have to remove them. So, if the PFAS level was 200 nanograms per litre (200ng/I) and the water companies dilute the water so it is 100mg/l I now have to drink two glasses of water instead of one to poison myself as the chemical build up in the body is  accumulative.

If that were not bad enough, the UK government trusts the water companies to do the testing and “clean up” of these contaminants themselves. So the same companies that are illegally pumping millions of tonnes of untreated raw sewage into our rivers and seas are trusted to check for and dilute PSAF concentrations. And even when diluted to the UK governments recommended levels of acceptable contamination, those levels are 50 times higher than in many other countries.

We truly do have a poisonous government, a government that puts peoples health second to the profits of the water companies.

[bestpotsandpansforgasstove]

What Pans Do Gordon Ramsay Use

When it comes to cooking, the right equipment is essential, and no one knows this better than celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay. Known for his high standards in the kitchen, Ramsay's choice of cookware is a reflection of his commitment to quality and efficiency. In this article, we will explore the pans that Ramsay uses and why he favors them over other options.

Who is Gordon Ramsay?

Before diving into his favorite pans, let's take a moment to introduce the man behind the cooking. Gordon Ramsay is a Scottish-born British chef, restaurateur, and television personality who has gained worldwide recognition for his culinary expertise. He has been awarded multiple Michelin stars for his restaurants and has hosted several popular TV shows, including "Hell's Kitchen" and "MasterChef."

What Pans Does Gordon Ramsay Use?

So, what pans does Ramsay use in his kitchen? Here are some of his top picks:

1. All-Clad Stainless Steel Fry Pan

According to Ramsay, the All-Clad Stainless Steel Fry Pan is his go-to pan for cooking everything from scrambled eggs to seared steaks. The pan is made of tri-ply stainless steel with an aluminum core, which ensures even heat distribution and prevents hot spots. It also has a durable non-stick coating, making it easy to clean.

2. Scanpan Nonstick Fry Pan

Another favorite of Ramsay's is the Scanpan Nonstick Fry Pan. This pan features a ceramic titanium non-stick coating that is free from PFOA and PFOS, making it a healthier option. It also has excellent heat retention and is oven safe up to 500 degrees Fahrenheit.

3. T-fal E93808 Professional Total Nonstick Fry Pan

For those on a budget, Ramsay recommends the T-fal E93808 Professional Total Nonstick Fry Pan. This pan has a Thermo-Spot indicator that lets you know when the pan is preheated and ready to use, ensuring that your food cooks evenly. It also has a durable non-stick coating and is dishwasher safe.

4. Le Creuset Cast Iron Skillet

When it comes to searing meat, Ramsay swears by the Le Creuset Cast Iron Skillet. This heavy-duty cast iron skillet heats evenly and retains heat well, making it perfect for browning meat. It also has a durable enamel coating that resists chipping and cracking.

5. Mauviel Copper Fry Pan

Finally, Ramsay's most luxurious pick is the Mauviel Copper Fry Pan. Made of 90% copper and 10% stainless steel, this pan provides excellent heat conductivity and control, allowing you to cook your food precisely. It also has a beautiful polished finish that will impress any dinner guest.

View more: What Cookware Do Chefs Use

When Does Gordon Ramsay Use These Pans?

Ramsay uses these pans in his various restaurants and TV shows, as well as in his personal kitchen at home. He believes that using high-quality cookware is essential to achieving the best results in the kitchen.

How to Choose the Right Pan for You

Now that we've seen some of Ramsay's favorite pans, how can you choose the right one for yourself? Here are some factors to consider:

1. Material

Different materials have different properties that affect how they conduct and retain heat. For example, stainless steel is durable and easy to clean but is not the best conductor of heat. Cast iron is an excellent heat conductor and retainer but is heavy and requires seasoning to maintain its non-stick surface.

2. Size

Consider the size of the pan relative to the amount of food you will be cooking. A smaller pan may work for single servings or small meals, while a larger pan is necessary for cooking for a family or entertaining guests.

3. Non-Stick Coating

Non-stick coatings make it easier to cook without food sticking to the pan, making cleanup a breeze. However, some non-stick coatings may contain harmful chemicals, so choose a pan with a safe and durable coating.

4. Price

Quality pans can be expensive, but they are often worth the investment. Consider your budget and how much you will use the pan before deciding on a purchase.

Pros and Cons of Gordon Ramsay's Favorite Pans

Let's break down the pros and cons of using the pans that Gordon Ramsay favors:

Pros

High-quality materials ensure even heat distribution and retention

Durable non-stick coatings make cleanup easy

Recommendations from a world-renowned chef give confidence in their effectiveness

Cons

Expensive compared to other options on the market

May not be suitable for all budgets and skill levels

Not everyone may prefer the same type of pan for their cooking needs

Alternatives to Gordon Ramsay's Favorite Pans

While Ramsay's favorite pans are undoubtedly top-of-the-line, they may not be the right fit for everyone. Here are some alternatives to consider:

1. Lodge Cast Iron Skillet

The Lodge Cast Iron Skillet is a budget-friendly alternative to the Le Creuset Cast Iron Skillet. It is made in the USA and comes pre-seasoned, so you can start cooking right away. It also has excellent heat retention and is suitable for use on all cooktops, including induction.

2. GreenPan Ceramic Non-Stick Fry Pan

For those who prefer ceramic non-stick coatings, the GreenPan Ceramic Non-Stick Fry Pan is an excellent option. It is made with a diamond-infused coating that is extremely durable and scratch-resistant. It also heats up quickly and evenly, making it perfect for searing and sautéing.

3. Calphalon Stainless Steel Fry Pan

If you prefer stainless steel pans but don't want to splurge on All-Clad, the Calphalon Stainless Steel Fry Pan is a great alternative. It has an aluminum core for even heating and a brushed stainless steel exterior that resists fingerprints. It also has a stay-cool handle for added comfort and safety.

Step-by-Step Guide to Using Gordon Ramsay's Favorite Pans

Now that you've chosen your pan, here's a step-by-step guide to using it like a pro:

1. Preheat the Pan

Make sure your pan is adequately preheated before adding any food. This will ensure that your food cooks evenly and prevents sticking. For non-stick pans, wait until the Thermo-Spot indicator turns solid red before adding your ingredients.

2. Add Oil or Butter

Once the pan is hot, add a small amount of oil or butter to coat the bottom of the pan. This will prevent the food from sticking and also add flavor.

3. Add Your Food

Carefully add your food to the pan, taking care not to overcrowd it. Overcrowding the pan can cause the temperature to drop, resulting in uneven cooking.

4. Monitor the Heat

Adjust the heat as needed to ensure that your food cooks evenly without burning. If you're unsure, use a meat thermometer to check the internal temperature of your food.

5. Clean the Pan

Once you're finished cooking, allow the pan to cool before cleaning. For non-stick pans, avoid using abrasive sponges or cleaners, which can damage the coating. Instead, use a soft sponge with mild soap and warm water.

Tips for Using Gordon Ramsay's Favorite Pans

Here are some additional tips to help you get the most out of your new pan:

Don't be afraid to experiment with different types of food to see what works best in your pan.

Avoid using metal utensils on non-stick surfaces, as this can scratch and damage the coating.

Always use oven mitts or a potholder when handling hot pans.

Store your pans properly to prevent scratching and damage.

The Best Gordon Ramsay Pan for You

Ultimately, the best pan for you depends on your personal cooking style and preferences. Consider the factors outlined above, such as material, size, and price, and choose a pan that suits your needs. Whether you opt for one of Ramsay's top picks or an alternative, investing in high-quality cookware is sure to elevate your cooking game.

Conclusion

Gordon Ramsay's favorite pans are a testament to his commitment to quality and efficiency in the kitchen. From the All-Clad Stainless Steel Fry Pan to the Mauviel Copper Fry Pan, each has its unique properties that make it suitable for different cooking needs. By choosing the right pan and following some straightforward tips, you can elevate your cooking game and impress your dinner guests with restaurant-quality meals.

FAQs

Can I use Gordon Ramsay's favorite pans on an induction cooktop? Yes, most of the pans mentioned in this article are compatible with induction cooktops.

Are non-stick coatings safe to use? Many non-stick coatings contain harmful chemicals such as PFOA and PFOS, so it is essential to choose a pan with a safe and durable coating.

How do I know when my pan is preheated? For non-stick pans, look for a Thermo-Spot indicator that turns solid red when the pan is preheated.

Can I use metal utensils on stainless steel pans? Yes, stainless steel pans are durable and can withstand the use of metal utensils.

Do I need to season my cast iron skillet? Yes, cast iron skillets require seasoning to maintain their non-stick surface. To season your skillet, coat it with oil and bake it in the oven at a high temperature for an hour. Repeat this process periodically to maintain the seasoning.

[manstrans]

a lawsuit claiming simply tropical by simply orange contains poisonous "forever chemicals" :)

In December 2022, a new consumer class action lawsuit was filed against Coca-Cola and its subsidiary The Simply Orange Juice Company in the Southern District of New York. The named plaintiff in the Simply Orange class action lawsuit is New York resident Joseph Lurenz, who is filing the case on behalf of all similarly situated parties. In this case, that includes everyone who bought Simply Tropical Juice made by The Simply Orange Juice Company. So that would include most people reading this. The lawsuit claims that Simply Tropical and Simply Orange is labeled and marketed as “All Natural” and claims that is “made simply” with “all-natural ingredients.” However, the lawsuit claims that the plaintiff has performed lab testing on Simply Tropical which confirms that the juice actually contains PFAS, synthetic chemicals which are obviously not natural. The Complaint goes on to recite the known health risks of PFAS: PFAS are a group of synthetic, man-made, chemicals known to be harmful to both humans and the environment. Because PFAS persist and accumulate over time, they are harmful even at very low levels. Indeed, “PFAS have been shown to have a number of toxicological effects in laboratory studies and have been associated with thyroid disorders, immunotoxicity effects, and various cancers in epidemiology studies. In fact, scientists are studying—and are extremely concerned about—how PFAS affect human health. Consequently, the CDC outlined “a host of health effects associated with PFAS exposure, including cancer, liver damage, decreased fertility, and increased risk of asthma and thyroid disease. The crux of the lawsuit is that the presence of PFAS is completely inconsistent with the marketing of Simply Tropical as an all natural juice product with natural ingredients. The Complaint asserts that this is false and misleading marketing in violation of various consumer protection laws The Complaint just makes a general allegation that third-party laboratory testing has shown “material levels” of PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) and PFOS (perfluorooctanesulfonic acid) contained in Simply Tropical. It does not specifically state the levels of PFAS found in the juice, but claims that they were found in excess of the EPA recommended levels for drinking water.

Until I know more about the lab testing I'm not sure just how true the claims against simply orange are but it wouldn't be surprising to learn that another megacorporation is poisoning its customers

a google search of the plaintiff's name does bring up a facebook page with the same name ended with Sr and general location (southern new york). all public status updates on said page are donations to various charities for causes like ending cancer and animal welfare. it also says he worked at new york state department of corrections and community supervision, though a linkedinn profile says he is retired. it's possible that this is not the plaintiff, maybe it could even be the Jr of the same name, but this does seem like a person who generally cares about causes such as poison in simply tropical

[willneverbreakme]

I'd also like to mention - currently the EU is working on a law to ban the production, import and use of PFAS within the EU (known as a REACH Restriction). This is a very good thing.

The USA currently has no legal mechanisms in place to prevent the use or manufacture of PFAS. For several years, the EPA has been working on making it easier to sue companies who cause significant environmental pollution of the two worst PFAS (PFOA & PFOS) but even this small of a deterrent has been delayed multiple years and still isn't in effect. The EPA have recently announced that they are considering regulating PFAS as a category in future, but I'm honestly not optimistic about the efficacy of this, US industry has been extremely effective in preventing any regulatory action on these chemicals. If you live in the USA and you have the chance to have any impact on any of these movements, please god voice your support before it's too late. As a significant producer of PFAS, the USA has to join the global movement against these chemicals for us to have any long term hope of removing them from our ecosystems

[darkmaga-returns]

Molly Taft/

December 20, 2024

After some shocking discoveries a few years back, Maine has led the charge in banning the use of sewage-based fertilizers, which have been found to contaminate farmlands with PFAS. Getting national policies on the books, however, may prove much harder.

In late December 2022, a rancher in Johnson County, Texas, called the constable’s office to complain about his neighbor. The neighbor had recently spread a kind of waste-derived fertilizer, known as biosolids, over his land, the caller said, and the piles were smoking. The caller and his wife were struggling to breathe, the fish in his pond had died, and he thought the biosolids were making him, his wife, and their animals sick. Dana Ames, the county’s environmental crimes investigator, had gotten complaints about biosolids before—the human waste product also known as sewage sludge has a particularly noxious smell—but this felt different. She did some research and found news articles about a dairy farmer in the state of Maine who had used biosolids on his land and whose milk showed sky-high levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS. Known as “forever chemicals” because of how long they persist in our environment, PFAS have been linked to a wide variety of human health concerns—and are also present in a range of industrial and consumer products, from firefighting foam to nonstick frying pans. While industry has known about the harms of these chemicals for decades, the government is just catching up: In April of this year, the Environmental Protection Agency set a first-ever drinking water standard for some of the most common forever chemicals, setting a maximum enforceable level of just four parts per trillion for PFOA and PFOS, the two most studied compounds. Some states, meanwhile, have taken regulation into their own hands. Because sludge can accumulate high levels of forever chemicals from municipal sewage, Maine banned the use of biosolids on farmlands entirely in 2022.

[medicomunicare]

"Forever chemicals" in public health: that's not a "forever young" for the impact diet and even indoors are playing

Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), also known as “forever chemicals” because of their persistence in the environment and in the human body, are a group of chemicals widely used in various industrial and consumer products. PFAS include a wide range of chemicals, with the most common being perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). They are found in nonstick coatings,…

[rjzimmerman]

This action is almost criminal, or it crosses the line. We know, from science (the course none of the trump people passed in school) that the forever chemicals (PFAS) pose substantial health hazards, including cancer. Yet, the idiot withdraw regs intended to provide safeguards to US citizens.

Excerpt from this story from Nation of Change:

In a stunning reversal of environmental progress, President Donald Trump’s administration has withdrawn a Biden-era proposal to limit the discharge of toxic PFAS chemicals, often referred to as “forever chemicals,” into industrial wastewater. This decision, made during the first week of Trump’s second term, represents a significant setback for public health and environmental protections, prioritizing corporate profits over the well-being of millions of Americans.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of thousands of human-made chemicals found in industrial processes, household products, food packaging, and even drinking water. PFAS are known for their resistance to breaking down in the environment, earning them the nickname “forever chemicals.” Exposure to PFAS has been linked to a range of serious health issues, including certain cancers, immune suppression, thyroid disease, and developmental harm.

An analysis by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) revealed that an estimated 143 million Americans are exposed to PFAS through tap water. The contamination is so widespread that trace amounts of PFAS are found in nearly everyone’s blood. Melanie Benesh, vice president for government affairs at the EWG, called the Trump administration’s decision to withdraw the proposed PFAS regulations a “devastating setback,” stating: “This move not only delays establishing critical federal standards but also sends a dangerous message giving polluters a green light to continue poisoning our water and communities without fear of consequence.”

Under the Biden administration, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had taken historic steps to address the PFAS crisis. These efforts included:

• Establishing the first-ever enforceable limits for PFAS in drinking water.

• Classifying two common PFAS chemicals, PFOA and PFOS, as hazardous substances under the Superfund law.

• Allocating $9 billion in federal funding to help utilities upgrade water treatment facilities and remove PFAS from the water supply.

However, the Trump administration has moved swiftly to dismantle these advancements. The EPA’s proposed rule, which would have set federal discharge limits on PFAS in industrial wastewater, was withdrawn just days after the new administration took office. The rule was initially designed to regulate discharges from about 13 facilities, but the broader implications of PFAS contamination affect nearly 30,000 industrial sites nationwide, according to the EWG.

[lokeshsv]

The Omichef Difference: What Sets Our Cookware Apart

In today’s kitchen, having the right cookware can make all the difference between a pleasant cooking experience and a frustrating one. At Omichef, we believe that cookware is more than just a tool—it’s an essential companion that elevates your cooking, turning everyday meals into extraordinary creations. As one of the leading cookware brands in Delhi, Omichef prides itself on offering high-quality, durable, and efficient products. Our cookware is designed to not only meet but exceed the expectations of home cooks and professional chefs alike. So, what sets Omichef apart? Let’s dive into the key reasons why our cookware is the preferred choice for households across India.

Quality Materials for Superior Performance

At the heart of every Omichef product is a commitment to quality. We understand that superior cookware starts with the right materials, which is why our products are crafted from premium-grade metals such as stainless steel, aluminum, and cast iron. These materials are known for their excellent heat retention and distribution properties, ensuring that your food cooks evenly and to perfection every time.

One of our standout features is our focus on non-stick technology. Omichef’s non-stick cookware is made using advanced coatings that are both PFOA-free and highly durable, providing a smooth, non-toxic cooking surface. This not only reduces the need for excessive oil or butter, making your meals healthier, but also makes cleaning up a breeze. Whether you’re flipping pancakes or sautéing vegetables, our non-stick pans ensure a hassle-free experience.

Built to Last: Durability Meets Functionality

At Omichef, we know that investing in cookware is a long-term decision. That’s why our products are designed to withstand the test of time. From the sturdy construction of our pressure cookers to the heat-resistant handles on our frying pans, every detail is meticulously crafted with durability in mind. We understand the wear and tear that cookware endures in a busy kitchen, and our goal is to provide products that can endure daily use while maintaining peak performance.

Our stainless steel range, for example, is resistant to rust, corrosion, and discoloration, ensuring that it remains as beautiful as it is functional even after years of use. Cast iron products, another specialty at Omichef, are known for their exceptional durability. Properly cared for, these pieces can last a lifetime, becoming treasured kitchen heirlooms.

Versatile Range to Meet Every Need

One of the things that truly sets Omichef apart is the wide range of cookware we offer. Whether you’re preparing traditional Indian meals or experimenting with global cuisines, we have the perfect tools to support your culinary journey. Our collection includes everything from versatile frying pans, durable kadais, and saucepans to specialized items like tawa and Dutch ovens.

Omichef cookware is designed to cater to a diverse range of cooking styles. For instance, our pressure cookers are engineered to prepare quick, wholesome meals while locking in nutrients and flavors. Our tawa pans, on the other hand, ensure perfectly crispy dosas and rotis. Whatever your cooking needs, Omichef offers a solution that not only simplifies the process but enhances the results.

Innovation and Safety at the Core

At Omichef, innovation is one of our core values. We continuously strive to improve our products through research and development. Our cookware features advanced heat conduction technology that distributes heat evenly across the surface, preventing hot spots and ensuring consistent cooking. Additionally, many of our products come equipped with heat-resistant handles and shatterproof lids, making them safer and more user-friendly.

Safety is paramount in every kitchen, and Omichef’s cookware is designed with that in mind. All of our products undergo rigorous quality checks to ensure they meet the highest safety standards. This means you can cook with confidence, knowing that your cookware is reliable and safe to use.

Conclusion: Omichef – The Perfect Choice for Every Kitchen

In conclusion, the Omichef difference lies in our dedication to quality, durability, versatility, and innovation. We are committed to revolutionizing home cooking across India by providing cookware that makes your kitchen experience easier, healthier, and more enjoyable. Our premium materials, thoughtful design, and attention to detail ensure that every Omichef product not only performs exceptionally but also stands the test of time.

[whole-house-water-filtration]

PFAS Water Filters: Protecting Your Health from Forever Chemicals

In recent years, PFAS contamination has become a growing concern for communities around the world. Known as "forever chemicals," Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) are synthetic chemicals that do not break down easily in the environment or the human body, leading to potential health risks. As awareness of PFAS increases, many are looking for ways to protect themselves from these harmful chemicals, and one of the most effective solutions is using PFAS water filters.

This blog will explore the dangers of PFAS, the benefits of using PFAS water filters, and how to choose the right filter to ensure your drinking water is safe.

What are PFAS?

PFAS are a group of man-made chemicals used in various industries since the 1940s. They are commonly found in products like non-stick cookware, water-repellent clothing, firefighting foams, and certain food packaging. While their resistance to heat, water, and oil makes them useful in many applications, these same qualities mean they persist in the environment and our bodies for long periods.

Some of the health risks associated with PFAS exposure include:

Increased risk of cancer

Immune system suppression

Liver damage

Thyroid hormone disruption

Developmental issues in children

How Do PFAS Get into Drinking Water?

PFAS can enter water sources through industrial discharges, firefighting foam runoff, and even landfill leachate. Since they are highly mobile in water, PFAS can spread over large areas and contaminate groundwater, rivers, and lakes, eventually reaching our taps.

Drinking water contaminated with PFAS is a major exposure route for many people. Unfortunately, conventional water treatment plants are not always equipped to remove these chemicals, making it essential for individuals to take extra steps to filter PFAS from their water supply.

How Do PFAS Water Filters Work?

Not all water filters can remove PFAS. Filters designed specifically for this purpose often use activated carbon, reverse osmosis, or a combination of filtration technologies to effectively capture and eliminate PFAS compounds.

Activated Carbon Filters: These filters trap PFAS molecules on the surface of carbon granules. While highly effective, activated carbon filters require regular replacement to maintain their efficiency.

Reverse Osmosis Systems: These systems use a semi-permeable membrane to remove PFAS along with other contaminants. Reverse osmosis is one of the most effective methods for filtering PFAS, but it can be more expensive and may waste more water compared to other methods.

Ion Exchange Filters: Some advanced filtration systems use ion exchange resins to specifically target and remove PFAS compounds. These filters are highly effective for long-chain PFAS chemicals, such as PFOA and PFOS.

Benefits of PFAS Water Filters

Protection Against Health Risks The most significant benefit of PFAS water filters is the protection they offer against the harmful effects of these chemicals. By removing PFAS from your drinking water, you reduce your risk of cancer, hormonal disruptions, and other serious health conditions linked to PFAS exposure.

Improved Water Quality Beyond just PFAS, many of these filtration systems also remove other common contaminants like heavy metals, pesticides, and chlorine, improving the overall quality and taste of your drinking water.

Peace of Mind Knowing that your water is free from toxic chemicals can provide peace of mind, especially for families with young children who are more vulnerable to the effects of PFAS.

Choosing the Right PFAS Water Filter

When selecting a PFAS water filter, it’s essential to choose one that has been tested and certified for PFAS removal. Look for filters certified by reputable organizations, such as the NSF International or Water Quality Association (WQA), for the reduction of PFOA and PFOS levels.

Here are a few factors to consider:

Type of Filter: Decide whether an activated carbon filter, reverse osmosis system, or another filtration method is right for your household based on your budget, water usage, and filtration needs.

Filter Maintenance: Consider how often the filter needs to be replaced and whether you can easily maintain the system.

Size and Installation: Choose between whole-house filtration systems or under-sink filters, depending on whether you want to filter all the water in your home or just your drinking water supply.

Final Thoughts

PFAS contamination is a serious environmental and health issue, but taking proactive steps to protect your family with a PFAS water filter can reduce your exposure. Whether you choose an activated carbon filter, reverse osmosis system, or a combination of technologies, investing in the right filter is an important step toward safer, cleaner water.

By staying informed and choosing a reliable water filtration system, you can safeguard your health and minimize the impact of these harmful "forever chemicals" on your household.

[sydneywaterfilters]

PFAS Water Filters: Protecting Your Health from Forever Chemicals

In recent years, PFAS contamination has become a growing concern for communities around the world. Known as "forever chemicals," Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) are synthetic chemicals that do not break down easily in the environment or the human body, leading to potential health risks. As awareness of PFAS increases, many are looking for ways to protect themselves from these harmful chemicals, and one of the most effective solutions is using PFAS water filters.

This blog will explore the dangers of PFAS, the benefits of using PFAS water filters, and how to choose the right filter to ensure your drinking water is safe.

What are PFAS?

PFAS are a group of man-made chemicals used in various industries since the 1940s. They are commonly found in products like non-stick cookware, water-repellent clothing, firefighting foams, and certain food packaging. While their resistance to heat, water, and oil makes them useful in many applications, these same qualities mean they persist in the environment and our bodies for long periods.

Some of the health risks associated with PFAS exposure include:

Increased risk of cancer

Immune system suppression

Liver damage

Thyroid hormone disruption

Developmental issues in children

How Do PFAS Get into Drinking Water?

PFAS can enter water sources through industrial discharges, firefighting foam runoff, and even landfill leachate. Since they are highly mobile in water, PFAS can spread over large areas and contaminate groundwater, rivers, and lakes, eventually reaching our taps.

Drinking water contaminated with PFAS is a major exposure route for many people. Unfortunately, conventional water treatment plants are not always equipped to remove these chemicals, making it essential for individuals to take extra steps to filter PFAS from their water supply.

How Do PFAS Water Filters Work?

Not all water filters can remove PFAS. Filters designed specifically for this purpose often use activated carbon, reverse osmosis, or a combination of filtration technologies to effectively capture and eliminate PFAS compounds.

Activated Carbon Filters: These filters trap PFAS molecules on the surface of carbon granules. While highly effective, activated carbon filters require regular replacement to maintain their efficiency.

Reverse Osmosis Systems: These systems use a semi-permeable membrane to remove PFAS along with other contaminants. Reverse osmosis is one of the most effective methods for filtering PFAS, but it can be more expensive and may waste more water compared to other methods.

Ion Exchange Filters: Some advanced filtration systems use ion exchange resins to specifically target and remove PFAS compounds. These filters are highly effective for long-chain PFAS chemicals, such as PFOA and PFOS.

Benefits of PFAS Water Filters

Protection Against Health Risks The most significant benefit of PFAS water filters is the protection they offer against the harmful effects of these chemicals. By removing PFAS from your drinking water, you reduce your risk of cancer, hormonal disruptions, and other serious health conditions linked to PFAS exposure.

Improved Water Quality Beyond just PFAS, many of these filtration systems also remove other common contaminants like heavy metals, pesticides, and chlorine, improving the overall quality and taste of your drinking water.

Peace of Mind Knowing that your water is free from toxic chemicals can provide peace of mind, especially for families with young children who are more vulnerable to the effects of PFAS.

Choosing the Right PFAS Water Filter

When selecting a PFAS water filter, it’s essential to choose one that has been tested and certified for PFAS removal. Look for filters certified by reputable organizations, such as the NSF International or Water Quality Association (WQA), for the reduction of PFOA and PFOS levels.

Here are a few factors to consider:

Type of Filter: Decide whether an activated carbon filter, reverse osmosis system, or another filtration method is right for your household based on your budget, water usage, and filtration needs.

Filter Maintenance: Consider how often the filter needs to be replaced and whether you can easily maintain the system.

Size and Installation: Choose between whole-house filtration systems or under-sink filters, depending on whether you want to filter all the water in your home or just your drinking water supply.

Final Thoughts

PFAS contamination is a serious environmental and health issue, but taking proactive steps to protect your family with a PFAS water filter can reduce your exposure. Whether you choose an activated carbon filter, reverse osmosis system, or a combination of technologies, investing in the right filter is an important step toward safer, cleaner water.

By staying informed and choosing a reliable water filtration system, you can safeguard your health and minimize the impact of these harmful "forever chemicals" on your household.

[orancookware123]

Oran Cookware: Premier Steel Cooker Wholesaler In Delhi

In the bustling market of Delhi, where quality and reliability are paramount, finding a trustworthy wholesaler for kitchenware can be a game-changer for retailers and distributors. Oran Cookware emerges as a top choice for those seeking high-quality stainless steel pressure cookers and non-stick cookware. As a renowned stainless steel pressure cooker manufacturer/supplier and non-stick cookware manufacturer/supplier, Oran Cookware offers a range of products that cater to the diverse needs of the kitchenware industry.

Why Oran Cookware Stands Out as Your Wholesaler in Delhi

1. Expertise in Stainless Steel Pressure Cookers

As a leading stainless steel pressure cooker manufacturer and supplier, Oran Cookware is known for producing durable and efficient pressure cookers that meet the highest standards. Our pressure cookers are crafted from high-grade stainless steel, ensuring resistance to corrosion and long-lasting performance. Ideal for both home kitchens and commercial use, our pressure cookers are designed to handle high pressure and provide consistent cooking results.

2. Comprehensive Non-Stick Cookware Range

In addition to our expertise in stainless steel products, Oran Cookware excels as a non-stick cookware manufacturer and supplier. Our range of non-stick cookware includes frying pans, saucepans, and other essentials that are perfect for everyday cooking. We use advanced non-stick coatings that are free from harmful chemicals like PFOA, ensuring safe and efficient cooking. Our non-stick cookware is designed to offer easy food release and effortless cleanup, making it a popular choice among consumers.

3. Custom Solutions for Retailers

At Oran Cookware, we understand that each retailer and distributor has unique requirements. We offer customized solutions to meet specific needs, from product design to packaging. Whether you are looking for specific sizes, colors, or branding options, we work closely with our clients to provide tailored products that enhance their market presence.

4. Commitment to Quality

Quality is a cornerstone of our manufacturing process. Each product undergoes rigorous quality control checks to ensure it meets our stringent standards. Our commitment to quality is reflected in the durability and performance of our products, making them a reliable choice for retailers and consumers alike.

5. Efficient Supply Chain

As a prominent wholesaler in Delhi, Oran Cookware is committed to ensuring timely and efficient deliveries. We have streamlined our supply chain to handle orders of all sizes, ensuring that our clients receive their products on time and in perfect condition. Our reliable supply chain management helps retailers maintain their inventory levels and meet market demand without delays.

Why Delhi Businesses Prefer Oran Cookware

Delhi, being a major commercial hub, demands high-quality kitchenware products that cater to a diverse clientele. Oran Cookware’s reputation for excellence in manufacturing stainless steel pressure cookers and non-stick cookware makes us a preferred partner for businesses in Delhi. Our products are not only high in quality but also competitively priced, offering excellent value for money.

Conclusion

If you are a retailer or distributor in Delhi looking for a reliable and high-quality steel cooker wholesaler, look no further than Oran Cookware. As a leading stainless steel pressure cooker manufacturer/supplier and non-stick cookware manufacturer/supplier, we provide a range of top-notch kitchenware products that meet the needs of your customers. Contact oran cookware today to explore our product offerings and discover how Oran Cookware can support your business with premium kitchenware solutions.