We had a bunch of people come up with Albe’s shirt graphics. We decided to leave it up to you guys to pick which one we should use. Here are a handful of the ones we dug. Comment below with the number of the design you’d like to see printed. #albesbmx #albes (at Albe's) https://www.instagram.com/p/Cmw5Q9cPwAy/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=
2 notes
·
View notes
le big catnap with a lazer pointer perhaps?
imagine that blorbo scurrying around in a very unnatural way determined to get that red dot
Yes.
1K notes
·
View notes
Thank you for also going insane over the King Charles portrait, I thought it was a joke???? Unhinged. All I could think of was Beksinski, though it's much too figurative for that I suppose. How is this real?
Beksinski is a little more surreal I think? This is just brutal. Visceral. I look at this and I can smell the gore. And he looks dead as well, with the grey undertones to his skin, the blood-splattered hands. ffs, the shading on his face makes it look like something is oozing from his nose. Theres nothing remotely dream-like or subtle or metaphorical about it.
And it would be a fine work of art, provocative, yes, blunt, sure, maybe to the point of banality, depending on your taste. But what elevates this to the realm of "Oh you gotta be fucking kidding me" is the fact that the royal family paid for that. They commissioned it! This isn't an act of protest. This isn't criticism. They had the literal goddamn king of England painted like a decaying zombie. On purpose.
He looks like he bathes in the blood of infants daily and it barely keeps his undead body functioning. He looks like someone wanted to make Frankenstein's monster but all they had was their own grandpa and a local butchery.
Like come on. Come ON. If you had your evil space emperor depict himself like that, it would be tired and cliche. But somehow, THIS
is reality.
46 notes
·
View notes
@ajm_969_bmx scored the Cult 18” giveaway bike for a super stoked cousin! Congrats to you both!! #albesbmx #albes #ridersgottoride https://www.instagram.com/p/CmpcKo1PD6r/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=
2 notes
·
View notes
All the proof that's needed to prove that all 8 of them are loved, adored, and have the potential for so more (Web series, TV show, etc.).
Thank you for creating such fun characters, and we all hope they can come back one day! 💞
Seeing all of these asks has me tearing up ;;;;
It makes me so unbelievably happy that the critters, something I was a part of to bring them to life, are getting so much love from the poppy playtime community.
It touches me, and I couldn't be more grateful to create it while also being part of an amazing team.
I'm still shaken up at the fact that every time I open and play chapter three and see my animation...
..My illustrations on the books in game...
And my name in the credits...
I'm now part of something that has impacted and inspired me emotionally. Something that I cherish so deeply about, I couldn't be more humbled by it.
So thank you for loving the critters and chapter 3 of poppy playtime. I was never expecting to get this far in life.
1K notes
·
View notes
(this is from my limited knowledge from my 4 years of french classes so disclaimer: i am not french! i know very basic grammar rules and that's it!)
i believe it depends on the gender of your speaker for the personal pronoun (mon/ma); you would use "mon" if you're male, nonbinary (i did not learn about gender neutral pronouns so correct me if i'm wrong), or prefer this pronoun and you would use "ma" if you're female or prefer this pronoun.
regarding how you would refer to people of different gender (let's use chéri in this exemplar), you would call a man "chéri", as chéri itself is masculine. you would call a woman "chérie" with an emphasis on the added "e" as that makes it feminine.
so, if you're male, "mon" is the personal pronoun for "my", so even if what you're referring to is feminine, you would still use "mon".
basically:
"mon chérie" = you are a man calling a woman "darling"
"mon chéri" = you are a man calling a man "darling"
"ma chérié" = you are a woman calling a woman "darling"
"ma chéri" = you are a woman calling a man "darling"
there is an exception where a woman would use the masculine pronoun!! it's if the next word after the pronoun is a vowel (i.e. amour). "ma amour" sounds gross (my teacher's words, not mine) so you would use "mon amour" so it flows better when speaking.
yeah french is weird because everything has a gender—bread, a table, your couch. hope this helps! /gen
Hey, thanks for the answer!
Your reasoning is indeed correct, but you mixed up the use of the gendered term. The gender of the term being used actually depends on the "gender" of person/object you are talking about, and not the person speaking!
Therefore, yes, you would indeed use "mon" for men and "ma" for women, but that is the man/woman you are speaking about, and not yourself.
So:
"mon chéri" = a man or woman calling a man "darling"
"ma chérie" = a man or woman calling a woman "darling"
"mon chérie" or "ma chéri" are grammatically incorrect, as the agreement (accord in French lol idk the English word) of the name does not match.
I think this is what you were trying to get to with the exception. "Ma amour" is simply not correct because unlike the word "chéri", the word "amour" does not actually have a gendered version, and is conjucated the same way for all genders.
Yes, I agree. French is a terrible language for grammar rules. Hope this helps refresh (Good? Bad?) memories of HS French!😁
69 notes
·
View notes