#XNXP Personality Traits

[thetechdiary]

Silent No More: The C.W. Park USC Lawsuit Exposed

In the esteemed halls of the University of Southern California (USC), where academic pursuits and institutional reputations intertwine, the story of C.W. Park USC Lawsuit against the university unfolds as a powerful testament to breaking the silence. "Silent No More" illuminates the narrative, exposing the layers of allegations, legal complexities, and the resounding call for justice that echoes within the walls of the institution.

The narrative begins with an introduction to C.W. Park, a respected faculty member at USC, whose academic journey takes an unexpected turn, leading to the initiation of a lawsuit that seeks to break the silence surrounding alleged injustices within the university. "Silent No More" sets the stage, delving into the academic contributions, the alleged grievances, and the series of events that propel C.W. Park into the center of a legal battle against the institution.

The USC lawsuit, meticulously crafted by C.W. Park, encompasses a spectrum of allegations spanning workplace discrimination to claims of academic impropriety. As the narrative unravels, the silence surrounding these allegations begins to shatter, exposing the specific claims and the legal foundations that underpin the lawsuit. "Silent No More" aims to provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of the unfolding legal drama within the USC lawsuit, a drama that refuses to remain confined to whispers.

As the legal battle gains momentum, "Silent No More" sheds light on the challenges faced by C.W. Park in navigating the complex terrain of the legal system. The narrative explores the echoes of courtroom debates, legal arguments, and procedural intricacies, offering a nuanced perspective on the hurdles inherent in challenging a prestigious institution like USC. The pursuit of justice becomes a compelling narrative, one that refuses to be silenced.

The support systems surrounding C.W. Park come into focus as a crucial element in this narrative. Colleagues, friends, and allies become key players in the pursuit of justice, amplifying the voice of the aggrieved scholar. "Silent No More" illustrates the alliances formed, showcasing the collective effort to break the silence within the intricate legal landscape. It becomes a testament to the power of solidarity in the face of institutional silence.

The backdrop of academia, with its principles of fairness, diversity, and academic freedom, becomes a critical context for "Silent No More." The narrative probes the dissonance between these ideals and the alleged realities of discrimination and bias within the university. The lawsuit becomes a resounding call to break the silence surrounding systemic issues and prompts broader societal conversations about equity within educational institutions.

Amidst the legal intricacies, "Silent No More" turns a poignant lens toward the emotional toll on C.W. Park. The narrative unveils the human side of the legal battle—the sleepless nights, the personal sacrifices, and the emotional strain that accompanies standing against an esteemed institution. The pursuit of justice becomes a personal journey, illustrating the resilience required to break the silence and confront perceived wrongs.

The conclusion of "Silent No More: The C.W. Park USC Lawsuit Exposed" is not merely a legal resolution but a recognition of the enduring impact on the USC community. The narrative stands as a testament to the courage required to break the silence, navigate the complexities of the legal system, and contribute to the ongoing conversation about justice within the academic landscape.

As the final pages turn, "Silent No More" leaves behind a legacy of empowerment—a narrative that encourages reflection on the intricacies of breaking the silence and the enduring challenges faced by individuals who strive to expose systemic issues within esteemed institutions. The lawsuit becomes not just a legal battle but a resounding call for transparency, a catalyst for examination, and a declaration that injustice will no longer remain silent within the realms of higher education.

[infpisme]

[mr-entj]

I was wondering if you've seen mental health or mental disorders cause people to mistype their personalities?

Yes, often. The most common ones:

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) -> High Ne (xNxP)

Paranoid Personality Disorder (PPD) -> High Ni (xNxJ)

Depression (the apathetic to consequences and unfiltered anger version of depression, not the whiny sadness version) -> High Te (xxTJ)

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) -> High Ti (xxTP)

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) -> High Se (xSxP)

Anxiety -> High Si (xSxJ)

Bipolar Disorder -> High Fe (xxFJ)

Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) -> High Fi (xxFP)

If your 'personality traits' impair your ability to function as a human being, then they're no longer traits-- they're disorders. Seek professional help.

[dearmbti]

Type Spotting

Do you want to find out someone else’s type but don’t want to ask them to take the test?

In the spirit of this blog, let’s continue to stay indirect and do the typing ourselves.

(Just for future reference, this is now a dedicated page on my blog.)

* * *

Spotting by temperament:

How do they seem from the outside?

ExxJ: Friendly, helpful, and conscientious, although a little bossy and overwhelming.

ExxP: Adventurous, high-energy, and uninhibited, although a little impulsive and unpredictable.

IxxJ: Reserved, introspective, and responsible, although a little obsessive and uptight.

IxxP: Flexible, individualistic, and non-conforming, although a little aloof and indecisive.

If they had to give someone advice, are they most likely to tell you to:

xSxJ: Proceed with caution, remain patient and learn from experience.

xSxP: Don’t think too much and just do it.

xNxJ: Reflect carefully on implications and what it means for your future.

xNxP: Consider the big picture, embrace change and be optimistic.

How would you describe their learning style?

xSxJ: They prefer to learn with the appropriate method that relies on tried-and-true procedures.

xSxP: They prefer to learn by using hands-on or first-hand experiences.

xNxJ: They prefer to learn by taking a holistic approach to achieve intuitive understanding.

xNxP: They prefer to learn the “gist” of something before moving on.

What kind of personality traits seem to annoy them the most?

xxTJ: Indecisiveness, self-pity and wishy-washy behaviour.

xxTP: Dogmatic, overemotional and manipulative behaviour, as well as unwillingness to admit error.

xxFP: Lack of authenticity, intrusiveness and living by the book.

xxFJ: Impoliteness, aloofness and inconsiderate behaviour.

In conflict resolution, would they encourage you to:

xxTJ: Face the facts (and display frustration if you remain indecisive or self-pitying)?

xxFJ: See if there is a way to achieve a win-win situation (while potentially being a little overbearing about it)?

xxFP: Listen to your inner sense of what is right vs wrong (while avoiding influencing your decision-making)?

xxTP: Try to get a clear view of the situation, admit your shortcomings, and remain sensible (while avoiding influencing your decision-making)?

* * *

Spotting by dichotomies:

What tends to bother them more?

Loud and boisterous people who are too intrusive (I), or reserved people who are aloof and hard to engage with (E)?

Detached from reality, fantasising, and vague people (S), or stuck in the present, impractical, and blind to the future people (N)?

Detached reasoning and emotionally cold environments (F), or decision-making reliant on (gut) feelings and environments where emotional displays are common (T)?

Ambiguity, no direction, and lack of preparedness (J), or rigidness, unchanging environments, and lack of options (P)?

In conversations, are they:

Avid listeners who might monologue at length once the topic they’re passionate about comes up (I), or are they generally very expressive regardless of the conversation topic (E)? I.e., self-contained (I) vs conversational (E).

Most engaged when discussing events and personal experiences in fine detail (S), or when interpreting meaning and speculating about possibilities (N)?

Most convinced by impersonal reasoning or empirical data (T), or by general consensus or whether ideas align with their personal experience and values (F)?

Easily taken by the flow of a conversation, easily straying from original topic (P), or do they make sure to remain on topic and receive closure (J)?

When pressed to be active in the world, do they:

Tend to burn out quickly and become dissatisfied (I)?

Remain energised and are happier for it (E)?

When teaching someone a new subject, do they:

Emphasise crucial details and include anecdotal examples (S)?

Begin by giving you the big picture or supply you with context (N)?

Would you rather describe them as:

A little cold, even if well-meaning (T)?

Oversensitive, even if sensible (F)?

On average, are they more comfortable when:

They have a sense of direction or know the right procedure by which to act (plans being certain) (J)?

They are free to explore and deal with things as they go along (plans being open to change) (P)?

[logical-illogicalperson]

On Perfect Match categories and MBTI correlations

Okay, random thought, but since Pixelberrry has essentially given us something similar to MBTI in romance Perfect Match, I thought it over a bit and here are some of the correlations.

Outgoing/Mysterious definitely appears to be an Extroversion/Introversion reflection. Though introverts can still be social and extroverts can still be cagey about their choices, I think the correlation’s pretty sound.

Rebellious/Sweet is supposed to test how conventionally romantic your partner is. This has no real correlation with MBTI at all, but it’s probably more likely that people who prefer Rebellious types prefer Percieving types (with xSTP and xSFP the most strongly rebellious and people who prefer Sweet types preferring Feeling types (with xSFJ and xNFJ probably the closest.)

Humorous/Sincere is supposed to test how serious your partner is. No real correlation either, but sincere types will value authenticity (closest to xxFPs and xxTJs) and humorous types will value lightheartedness and the ‘mood of a situation’ (closest to xxTPs and xxFJs)

Logical/Impulsive is kind of a skewed J/P split with other traits involved, so tentatively, I’d say Logical types correlate more with xxTJ types, followed with xxFJ types, and Impulsive types correlate most strongly with xSxP types followed by xNxP types.

So if you have someone sweet, sincere, and logical, it’s more likely that you were thinking of an xxFJ type, even though logical seems to correlate more towards thinker types, and if you have someone rebellious, humorous, and impulsive, it’s possible that they are an xxFP type, but it’s probably more likely that they’re a xxTP type, and probably an xSTP if you’re really stretching it.

In conclusion:

Outgoing/Mysterious —> Exxx/Ixxx types.

Rebellious/Sweet —> (xSxP, xNxP)/(xxFJ, xxFP) types

Humorous/Sincere —> (xxTP, xxFJ)/(xxFP, xxTJ) types

Logical/Impulsive —> (xxTJ, xxFJ)/ (xSxP, xNxP) types

Or, in another form:

Outgoing/Mysterious —> E/I

Rebellious/Sweet —> (Se, Ne)/(Fe, Fi)

Humorous/Sincere —>(Ti/Fe axis)/(Te/Fi axis)

Logical/Impulsive —> (Te, Fe)/(Se, Ne)

Note: This is just VERY LIGHT CORRELATIONS and has little to no actual bearing on the MBTI type of the person you prefer since any type can work well together, but certain ideas repeat itself in this.

Also, if you’re interested in MBTI, here are a few tests you could take:

http://www.keys2cognition.com/explore.htm <—- My favorite, probably the most accurate out of the bunch. Will talk about cognitive functions though which are a little annoying but nothing a quick google search can’t resolve.

https://www.16personalities.com/free-personality-test <— In my opinion this test is terribly inaccurate, but it’s a pretty basic test and it’s also the most popular save for the actual MBTI so...I mean I guess...

You could also try the real MBTI but it’s expensive as hell and we all broke on this site so nope.

TL;DR Not a very strong connection but it’s decently useful if you can put it together. Again, use with caution because types don’t determine matches but they’re still useful to learn lol.

[languidschizoid]

it kinda makes sense

Low Si (so xNxP) can often causes rigidity - an autistic trait (at the same time Ne users often feel like they need constant mental stimulation, which is why i think ADHD is more common in NP types as well)

And think of other traits that aren't directly autistic traits, but common personality traits in autistic people: having a very strong sense of "right" and "wrong", sensitive but problems talking about your own feelings, empathetic but doesn't know how to comfort people etc

These are all associated with Fi

So it makes sense to me that autism would be quite common in INFPs

Hi! Just curious if you think or have noticed if certain MBTI types are more common in autistic people💕⭐️

From what I can tell, there seem to be a LOT of autistic INFPs (at least on tumblr). @sweetandsavageautistic made a post asking this and I scrolled through the responses, and other than INFPs I saw quite a few INTPs and a handful of INTJs and INFJs.

Before I got diagnosed, I assumed that autistic people were likely to be S’s. Apparently the opposite holds true.