#Weimer | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

ontheothersideofthehill · 1 month ago

Text

1968

BRENNER, MICHAEL. “Authenticity and Modernism Combined: Music and the Visual Arts.” In The Renaissance of Jewish Culture in Weimar Germany, 153–84. Yale University Press, 1996. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt32bvv4.10.

Brenner, Michael, and Derek J. Penslar, eds. In Search of Jewish Community: Jewish Identities in Germany and Austria, 1918-1933. Indiana University Press, 1998. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt200612t.

Canning, Kathleen. “The Politics of Symbols, Semantics, and Sentiments in the Weimar Republic.” Central European History 43, no. 4 (2010): 567–80. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40962727.

Chickering, Roger. “German Modernity and Its (Many) Champions.” The German Quarterly 90, no. 3 (2017): 358–60. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44968559.

DIJN, ANNELIEN de. “THE POLITICS OF ENLIGHTENMENT: FROM PETER GAY TO JONATHAN ISRAEL.” The Historical Journal 55, no. 3 (2012): 785–805. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23263274.

Fishman, Sterling. Review of German Mandarins and Weimar Culture, by Peter Gay and Fritz K. Ringer. History of Education Quarterly 10, no. 3 (1970): 381–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/367532.

Führer, Karl Christian. “German Cultural Life and the Crisis of National Identity during the Depression, 1929-1933.” German Studies Review 24, no. 3 (2001): 461–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/1433411.

Gerwarth, Robert. “The Past in Weimar History.” Contemporary European History 15, no. 1 (2006): 1–22. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20081292.

Griffin, Roger. “From Weimar Modernism to Nazi Modernism?” The German Quarterly 90, no. 3 (2017): 360–63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44968560.

Leith, James A. “Peter Gay’s Enlightenment.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 5, no. 1 (1971): 157–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/2737948.

Leydecker, Karl, ed. German Novelists of the Weimar Republic: Intersections of Literature and Politics. Boydell & Brewer, 2006. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7722/j.ctt81xkv.

PACHTER, HENRY M. “THE INTELLECTUALS AND THE STATE OF WEIMAR.” Social Research 39, no. 2 (1972): 228–53. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40970094.

Tauber, Kurt P. Review of A SCINTILLATING GUIDE, by Peter Gay. The Virginia Quarterly Review 45, no. 1 (1969): 152–55. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26443181.

Weitz, Eric D. “Weimar Germany and Its Histories.” Central European History 43, no. 4 (2010): 581–91. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40962728.

Weitz, Eric D. Weimar Germany: Promise and Tragedy (New and Expanded Edition). Princeton University Press, 2007. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt285599.

Williamson, George S. “Peter Gay (1923-2015).” Central European History 49, no. 1 (2016): 4–18. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43965625.

0 notes

msclaritea · 10 months ago

Text

Julianna Margulies, David Schwimmer Demand Academy's Inclusion Efforts Include Jews

Standards | Exclusive

“An inclusion effort that excludes Jews is steeped in antisemitism,” the JITC Hollywood Bureau for Jewish Representation’s open letter reads

Julianna Margulies, David Schwimmer, Debra Messing (Credit: Getty Images)

Benjamin Lindsey

January 9, 2024

Julianna Margulies, David Schwimmer and Debra Messing are among over 260 actors and other industry figures to sign an open letter demanding the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences include Jews in its representation and inclusion standards.

The letter, published Tuesday by the JITC Hollywood Bureau for Jewish Representation and shared exclusively by TheWrap, said that “an inclusion effort that excludes Jews is steeped in antisemitism and misunderstands it.”

HOW FUCKING DARE THEY?! These actors are ALL where they are, because of their heritage and connections. Make no mistake. Anyone with a brain can look at Hollywood and see who is on top.

Most if not all of the Academy board are Jewish.

The Writers Guild aka WGA apparently has so many Jewish members, they were able to bully SAGAFTRA into publicly announced support for Israel.

Not ONLY are many, many actors today, Jewish, we have seen some performers (Think Argentina President and Whoopi Goldberg etc) convert, as though there were some hidden rule that you have to do so. Or, like Emma Stone, hide their Jewish heritage. This doesn't even count the different mob outfits at work.

In addition, this year's Oscars had a definite Jewish theme. Just to give you a taste:

1. Oppenheimer, Jewish guy blows up 1000s of innocents. pre-WWII

2. Killers of The Flower Moon, felt gratuitous as hell. pre-WWII (Read the Talmud)

3. Another Holocaust film, Zone of Interest

4. The Gender Ideology Cult, based on Hebrew Paganism; current state of Hollywood. Weimer, pre-WWII

5. Barbie, based on the Bild 'Lilli' doll from a German magazine. LILITH is the name of a demon from the Hebrew Bible. This also explains the Sam Smith publicity stunt, where he claimed HIS song, represented Barbie. All of the Pink, the color assigned Gay men in WWII. Neat little sneak in.

6. Yorgos Lanthimos, known for Incest and underage Sex films, did Frankenstein. If you're a follower, you'll recall why that's important.

Finally, Mizz Margulies pulled an Antisemitic stunt, to help Israel, just recently AND I found out she did the voice of the alien on that horrible Doctor Who 60th Anniversay which pushed Transgenderism at kids and was Anti-Male. These people dangerous. Something is very wrong, right now.

0 notes

jayblanc · 1 year ago

Text

Chinese Censorship of the 2023 Hugo Award Nominations

Back before the 2023 Hugo Nominations were conducted, I noted that the Chengdu Worldcon Hugo committee had inserted a worrying clause indicating that local government officials could invalidate nominations for breaching the norms and standards of China. I suspected this would result in arbitrarily applied censorship to control the ballot. I am sad and unsurprised to discover I was correct.

The 2023 Hugo Nomination vote data has been published (https://www.thehugoawards.org/2024/01/2023-nominating-and-final-ballot-statistics-published/), and includes notation where nominations were excluded from the ballot. Those with normal reasons, such as being in the wrong category or not being published in 2022 are identified with their reasons for exclusion. This time there are a number of nominations that are merely marked at "Not eligible".

Here is the list of those nominations, that would otherwise have been placed on the final 2023 Hugo Award Ballot.

Babel - R.F. Kuang - Best Novel: Very likely excluded for referencing student revolution, and the use of language and translation as coercive tools of oppression. Color the World - Congyun "Mu Ming" Hu - Best Novellette : A story about perception of, aid of, and discrimination against disability. Congyun Hu has left China and now lives in New York. Fogong Temple Padoga - Hai Ya - Best Story : Either there is something in the original Chinese that was not translated, there's a taboo subject that elides my reading, or this otherwise innocent looking near future tale of cultural building restoration was written by the wrong person. The Art of Ghost of Tsushima: Dark Horse and Sucker Punch Games - Best Related Work : The video game Ghost of Tsushima was subject to directed social exclusion for it's depiction of the Mongol invasion of Japan. Sandman, Amazon Studios: Best Dramatic Presentation (Long and Short) - A diverse and divergent cast, includes subject matter and social issues that are currently taboo in China. Paul Weimer - Fan Writer: Publicly Critical of holding a Worldcon in China. Xiran Jay Zhao - Astounding Award: Qualifying work "Iron Widow" is reimagined story of Chinese Empress Wu during a fantasy/mechanical alien invasion.

This raises a lot of questions as to if this basically taints the process, and what can be done about it.