#Wdapteo 2023

[viewerspookyhappenings]

instead of baking this year i need dnp to cook savoury food like just a regular ass meal that isn’t from deliveroo or toast just to reassure me that we don’t need to call social services on these men in their 30s

[jareaulover]

This is the funniest way I could have gotten this notification.

[greycr3scent]

to commemorate the cinematic masterpiece of the year (wdapteo 2023), here is a phil sketch

(plus a hidden 🐗)

[legalisecatboyss]

phil taking pictures of dan wearing his glasses is such married behaviour, i’m putting myself into a dehydrator and crushing myself into a fine powder so that i can be scattered to the winds because i simply Can’t Cope with this

[danandfuckingjonlmao]

how do batteries work :(

(plus the full screenshot bc i can’t decide if it’s funnier cropped or not cropped)

[elleberquist6]

Something about how the night changes

Good to know Phil gave bad advice on his Red Cross spon vid (Fireworks Fail) 10 years ago...

[tiny-sassy-aggressive]

I sometimes forget Dan is taller than Phil, like by an inch or so but still taller than

Then I see this, and yeah I know posture but in this particular photo he’s so much taller than Phil but then there’s this

And he’s so much smaller and needing to look up to Phil.

Not to be dramatic or anything but I think Dan just likes looking up to Phil… or has bad posture. OR MAYBE BOTH?? Who am I to say

[finnisnotdrowning]

Matching pfps but it's just the 👽 and 😎 in the holes

[danandphilandthedevil]

Tell us more about how many times in the last year you had to edit out Dan's bare ass

[phannotfound]

Ya know what Dan I get it rly do 😭😭😭

cute 🥹

[simplydnp]

who's hand is in this picture?

A Mathematically Rigorous Proof That I Spent Too Long Writing

welcome to university math: dnp hand edition

(no, don't leave, you'll be fine i promise)

to begin, we need a statement to prove. we have two options:

- the hand is dan's hand

- the hand is phil's hand

now, for most proofs in university math, you are told a true statement, and you must show why it is true using logic rules, definitions, and theorems. but, we do not know which of these statements are true, so we have to find out.

to prove that a statement is true, we must show that it is always true for the situation presented. to show a statement is false, we must present a single instance where the statement is false (also known as a counter example).

a quick not scary math example:

definition: a prime number is only divisible by 1 and itself.

statement: all prime numbers are odd

(this is false, because 2 is a prime number and it is even. you don't even need to check if there's any others, all you need is one single case where it isn't true to disprove it)

so now that we have a little background on proofs and how to prove and disprove them, we go back to our two statements.

the thing with this situation is, one of them must be true (unless you're gung-ho on someone else holding dan's face while phil takes a picture on his phone of dan in his glasses, in which case, i applaud your commitment, but in actuality this proof will cover that option too)

the full statement we have is: dan is touching his face or phil is touching dan's face

now, because this is Real Life and we have a picture where a hand is touching dan's face, we know already that one of these options is true (as mentioned above) but! using symbolic logic you could also come to this conclusion.

this type of statement is an 'or' statement, and if you're curious, you can look into 'truth-tables' and see why, but at least one of the options must be true.

back to the proof at hand (bah-duhm-tss)

okay. now, proofs also must be 'general' in order to mean anything, really. these are statements of truth of the universe, not just for individuals. so, we will prove this generally.

we have 2 people involved, so individual 1 (dan, the owner of the face and potential face toucher) will be labelled as 'D' , and individual 2 (phil, the possible face toucher who does not own the face) will be labelled as 'P'. thus, this can be true for any such D and any such P.

so with our 'or' statement, in order to prove it, we pick one of the options and say that it is not true, and we have to show then that the other is true.

step 1: let's assume this is not P's hand. (assumption)

step 2: thus, it must be D's hand. (what we take from our assumption)

step 3: now, if it is D's hand, we look at what a hand on one's own face is capable of appearing like. (a definition or true fact about step 2)

the position in the given photo shows the hand with a thumb on the cheek, and a finger on the forehead. so, we find an example of a person with their fingers in the same position (or close to) and see if this supports our claim.

consider:

now, with this image, you can clearly see how the subject's right hand has the thumb on the temple and index finger on the top of their head, however, it is a close enough position for our case.

from the view of the camera, the closest finger to the camera is the edge of the pinkie. in fact, it will always be the closest finger to the camera in this position, assuming the subject has all fingers and no additional appendages.

step 4: we now compare this to our photo (we verify if this holds to our claim or contradicts it)

in our photo, the closest appendage to the camera is the edge of the thumb.

step 5: thus, it cannot be the case that D is touching their own face. (what the evidence says)

step 6: as we assumed it was not P's hand and have shown it cannot be D's hand, and as this is an 'or' statement both of these claims cannot be false, we can therefore conclude it must be P's hand. (our conclusion: re-stating the statement and assumptions and conclusion)

step 7: we verify that P is true (optional step but in beginner proofs you generally show why your case works)

to do this, i will show a picture of a person touching another's face, and compare it to our image.

consider:

now, this image is not exactly the same, similar to above. however, P's left thumb is on the cheek, with their index on D's temple. the closest appendage to the camera (if it were in a similar perspective as our original) would be the edge of the thumb.

comparing it to our original:

our comparison holds.

thus, we can conclude that the true claim in this statement is that P must be touching D's face, which, in particular means that:

phil is touching dan's face in the image

thank you for partaking in phannie mathematics. we now know. i am not sorry.

bonus:

phil has a hitchhikers thumb and dan doesn't so why was this necessary at all 🤡

[viewerspookyhappenings]

the “this person is doing onlyfans” “we should get a discount” is 1million% about someone who propositioned them for a threesome

[dnphobe]

i fully beliebe we got wdapteo 2023 out of peer pressure btw. bullying works and we should keep doing it (but only to dan and phil)

[ahappyphjl]

favorite wdapteo: wdapteo 4 (2023) // dpgdaily's dnpaw - day 3/7

[legalisecatboyss]

dan is never going to let phil live his participation in the weakest link down and honestly? as he should, that shit was fucking hilarious

[danandfuckingjonlmao]

that was the worst thing i’ve ever seen (read: that video pulled me from the depths of hell and gave me hot cocoa and a pat on the head. it was better than anything i could have imagined. healing. cleansing. i feel alive. clear skin crops watered grades up etc etc. i can drop out of therapy and stop taking my meds because all of my mental illness is gone (read: that was a joke do not stop therapy or meds without the guidance of a mental health professional). i am seeing the world with rainbows and sunshine for the first time. i can see clearly now loraine is gone (that was a repherence btw). my inner demons have been conquered and i only know joy. i want to skip through a field with flowers in my hair. everything is different for me now (read: nothing is different for me now but let me be delusional))