#Vikas Dubey Killed

[playermagic23]

Web Series Review: Panchayat Season 3

Star Cast: Jitendra Kumar, Raghubir Yadav, Neena Gupta, Chandan Roy, Faisal Malik, Sanvikaa, Pankaj Jha

Director: Deepak Kumar Mishra

Synopsis: PANCHAYAT SEASON 3 is the story of the feud between a villager and an egoistic MLA. After the events of the second season, a new 'Sachiv' (Vinod Suryavanshi) arrives in Phulera. Brij Bhushan Dubey (Raghubir Yadav), the Pradhan Pati, devises a plan. He keeps the Panchayat office locked on the day of the new Sachin's joining. Brij even doesn't pick up his call and so does Vikas (Chandan Roy). The new Sachiv complains to the MLA Chandrakishore Singh (Pankaj Jha), who in turn, complains to the DM (Kusum Shastri). The DM urgently calls Manju Devi (Neena Gupta), the Pradhan, to her office. Manju and Prahlad (Faisal Malik), the Up-Pradhan, make it clear that they want Abhishek Tripathi (Jitendra Kumar) back as the Sachiv. As luck would have it, the same day, the MLA is jailed for killing a dog. The DM cancels Abhishek's transfer and asks him to join Phulera Gram Panchayat. Brij, Manju, Vikas and Prahlad are overjoyed to have Abhishek back with them. But there are certain problems in front of the village. Prahlad is depressed over the death of his son, Rahul (Shiv Swaroop) and has turned an alcoholic as well. Meanwhile, the Gram Panchayat elections are around the corner and Bhushan (Durgesh Kumar) is determined to win at any cost. As part of his strategy, he decides to send an olive branch to the MLA. Soon, this leads to utter chaos and madness in Phulera. What happens next forms the rest of the show.

Panchayat Season 3 Story Review: Chandan Kumar's story is terrific and the writer manages to neatly take the story forward. Chandan Kumar's screenplay is very effective and is peppered with lots of entertaining and dramatic moments. But the surprise this season is that the show scores big time with the emotional scenes as well. Chandan Kumar's dialogues are sharp and hilarious as required. Some dialogues are bound to become memes, just like it happened in the previous season. A few one-liners, however, do give a feeling that they were written keeping in mind that it'll become meme-worthy.

Deepak Kumar Mishra's direction is praiseworthy. Like the previous seasons, the execution is neat and uncomplicated. Often, several cult shows tend to disappoint in the subsequent seasons. But PANCHAYAT has proved to be an exception. The writer and director have taken care that nothing is added for the heck of it and at the same time, the new developments carry the essence of the show. This time, the stakes are higher and hence, even the tension levels go high in some scenes.

On the flipside, some developments are silly. For instance, the idea of the Pradhan to not pick up the call of the new Sachiv is childish. But since it leads to LOL-worthy moments, one won't mind. The same happens with the scene where a family is given a house under the PM Awas Yojana scheme though they don't qualify for it. The reason behind it is far-fetched. However, it makes for a nice watch. Secondly, the romance between Abhishek and Rinki (Sanvikaa) doesn't progress much and it's a bit of a downer.

PANCHAYAT SEASON 3 begins on a very entertaining note and the first episode sets the mood. The sequence between Prahlad and Damyanti Devi (Abha Sharma) is lovely and the most emotional sequence of the show. The real fun begins once the MLA arrives in the village for a truce meeting. The scene starts ordinarily but ends on a high and is sure to bring the house down. From here, the show is highly entertaining. This time, there's also action and the final episode is very nail-biting. The last 10 minutes give a 'Katappa ne Baahubali ko kyun maara' or 'Lonavala mein kya hua' (THE FAMILY MAN) vibe and enhance the excitement for Season 4.

Panchayat Season 3 Performances: Jitendra Kumar doesn’t have much to do initially but later on, dominates the show. He’s totally gotten into the skin of the character by now and is very impressive. Raghubir Yadav, too, puts his best foot forward. Neena Gupta is first-rate and this time, her character gets a deeper understanding of politics. This adds a lot to her role and also her performance. Chandan Roy lends able support, as always. Faisal Malik has a difficult role this time but comes out with flying colours. Sanvikaa is a fine talent and her mere presence instantly lifts the impact of a scene. Pankaj Jha is outstanding as the antagonist. The same goes for Durgesh Kumar. Sunita Rajwar (Kranti Devi; Bhushan's wife) leaves a huge mark. Ashok Pathak (Binod) this time has a longer role, considering the popularity of his memes perhaps, and does very well. Asif Khan (Ganesh) is highly entertaining while Aanchal Tiwari (Raveena) is sweet. Abha Sharma is adorable and Vishal Yadav (Jagmohan) makes his presence felt. Prateek Pachauri (Babloo) and Ebaabdullah Khan (Dabloo) are funny. The others who do well are Tript Sahu (Khushu; Vikas's wife), Bulloo Kumar (Madhav; who sides with Bhushan), Gaurav Singh (Chottan Singh; MLA's PA), Amit Kumar Maurya (Bam Bahadur), Kusum Shastri, Vinod Suryavanshi, Shrikant Verma (Parmeshwar), Vishwanath Chatterjee (Sanjay Yadav; cop) and Diwakar Dhayani (BDO). Kirandeep Kaur (Chitra; MLA's daughter) doesn’t have much to do and hopefully, will have a stronger part in Season 4. Lastly, Swananad Kirkire (MP) has a promising cameo.

Panchayat Season 3 music and other technical aspects: Anurag Saikia's music enhances the impact. As for the songs, the Manoj Tiwari track is damn good. But watch out for 'Thame Dil Ko', sung by Abhijeet Bhattacharya. Amitabha Singh's cinematography is satisfactory. The bird's eye view shots of the village, especially, are memorable. Karishma Vyas' costumes and Naveen Lohara and Sayali Naikwadi Singh's production design are straight out of life. The action is realistic. Amit Kulkarni's editing is smooth.

Panchayat Season 3 Conclusion: On the whole, PANCHAYAT SEASON 3 fulfils all the humongous expectations and rests on bravura performances, some funny and dramatic sequences, nail-biting climax and meme-worthy dialogues. This time, the show also scores on the emotional front and also boasts of action scenes. Thanks to the insane popularity and word of mouth, the third season is bound to emerge as one of the most most-watched or maybe the most most-watched show for Amazon Prime Video this year. Recommended!

[thepursuitroom]

Gangster Vikas Dubey’s Relative Released from Jail

Kanpur: Khushi Dubey, a relative of gangster Vikas Dubey, who was killed in the killing of eight police officers in Kanpur, was released from jail on Saturday.

Khushi is the widow of Amar Dubey, an aide, and relative of the slain gangster. Days after the attack in which several policemen were killed and several injured, Vikas Dubey was shot dead by the Uttar Pradesh Police as he allegedly tried to escape from their custody.

[arun-pratap-singh]

Kanpur ambush: SC grants bail to slain gangster Vikas Dubey's relative Khushi Dubey, cites her as 'juvenil

Kanpur ambush: SC grants bail to slain gangster Vikas Dubey’s relative Khushi Dubey, cites her as ‘juvenil

India oi-Madhuri Adnal | Updated: Wednesday, January 4, 2023, 13:30 [IST] New Delhi, Jan 04: The Supreme Court on Wednesday granted regular bail to Khushi Dubey, widow of slain gangster Vikas Dubey’s aide and relative, Amar Dubey, reported ANI. Khushi Dubey challenged the Allahabad High Court order denying her bail in the case in which 8 policemen were killed in UP’s Kanpur village in July…

[dailynews9]

ED attaches properties of slain don Vikas Dubey, kin

ED attaches properties of slain don Vikas Dubey, kin

New Delhi: The Enforcement Directorate has attached at least 28 properties in Kanpur and Lucknow associated with Vikas Dubey, a UP gangster killed in an encounter two years ago after he was on the run killing eight policemen, including a DSP rank officer, in the state. Describing them as ‘ proceeds of crime ‘, the ED has said that the assets are in the name of Dubey and his family members. The…

[freelawbydjure]

Police Capabilities Regarding Encounters

Every society requires tranquilly and favourable conditions to advance. Disrupted and anarchic civilizations tend to devote all of their resources to unimportant endeavours. On the other hand, kids can develop and flourish if they have a sense of safety, security, and order. Herein lies the significance of the police in society. This system existed at all eras, in one form or another, with varying roles and obligations.

The word 'police' comes from the Latin word 'politia,' which signifies the state of a nation. The phrase refers to a set of rules for maintaining order and regulating the law. It basically refers to the deliberate preservation of public order and the protection of individuals and property against criminal acts committed against them.

Also Check: Supreme Courts Judgement Online

It also refers to the civil officials who are responsible for keeping public order and safety, upholding the law, and preventing and detecting crime. This work becomes more challenging in a multicultural, multiethnic, and enormous country with a large population, such as India.

The science of preserving peace and order in a dynamic society is policing. Consequently, the policing ideology, policing practises, and attitudes of those in charge of policing must change.

Since the late 20th century, the phrase encounter killing has been used in India and Pakistan to characterise extrajudicial executions by the police or armed forces, ostensibly in self-defense, when they confront suspected criminals or terrorists. Critics are sceptical of the police motivation behind a number of these recorded occurrences, and allege that the widespread acceptance of this terrible practise has led to instances of the police creating phoney confrontations to cover-up the death of individuals who were either in custody or unarmed.

According to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), fraudulent encounters are occasionally organised by police officers due to political masters' demand to produce rapid results by any means necessary. According to the NHRC's 2011 guidebook on human rights for police personnel, the public, particularly the educated middle class, does not mind if the police take the law into their own hands and become executioners, particularly with reference to feared criminals.

The second factor highlighted by the NHRC is that the country's sluggish criminal justice system exacerbates the police predicament. The duration of trials is virtually interminable, and the conclusion is unpredictable, especially in regards to the offenders who possess wealth, political influence, and physical might. Consequently, the police are under pressure to use shortcuts and illegal techniques. Very frequently, there is both political boss conspiracy and public backing.

Political leaders, public personalities, and the general populace have applauded the capture of criminal Vikas Dubey and his colleagues in light of the mounting concern and unease in the country over the escalating number of encounters. In addition, questions have been raised about the legality and appropriateness of the police action, resulting in a debate about whether a democratic country should follow constitutional norms and adhere to the due process of law or adopt measures of retributive justice to bring swift and instant justice to the victims.

It is acknowledged that encounters are one of the most significant and pervasive problems in our society. In a democratic nation like India, it is accountable for a huge number of extrajudicial killings, which is a tragic truth. This study presents, describes, analyses, investigates, and discusses Encounters in order to examine and expand existing understanding on the state of Encounters in India.

Relevant Laws

As long as the right to genuine self-defense is involved, Indian law does authorise police officers and citizens to murder another person.

Article 21 of the Constitution, however, states:

Protection of life and personal liberty - No individual should be deprived of his life or liberty unless in accordance with the legal process.

Although there is no provision in Indian law that expressly allows interactions with criminals, there are enabling clauses that may be construed in a variety of ways to grant police personnel the authority to deal with criminals.

In practically every situation when a police officer has been involved in an altercation, he or she acted in "self-defense."

Section 96 of the Criminal Code of India

Things done in private defense.-Nothing done in the exercise of the right to private defence constitutes an offence.

According to section 100 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), it is illegal to possess a firearm.

When the right of private defence of the body extends to causing death.-The right of private defence of the body extends, subject to the restrictions mentioned in the previous section, to the voluntary causing of death or of any other harm to the assailant, if the offence which gives rise to the exercise of the right is of any of the following descriptions:

Assaults that are capable of causing reasonable anxiety that death will otherwise be the result;

Assaults that might plausibly lead to the belief that grave harm will otherwise result from the attack.

An attack committed with the purpose to commit a rape;

An attack committed with the goal to satisfy unnatural passion;

An attack committed with the purpose to kidnap or abduct;

Assault with the aim to unlawfully confine a person, under conditions that may reasonably lead him to believe he would be unable to seek release from the public authorities.

IPC Section 97 states:

The right to defend one's body and property privately.

Subject to the constraints outlined in section 99, everyone has the right to defend:

His own body, as well as the bodies of others, against any offence against the human body;

The property, whether mobile or immovable, of oneself or any other person, against any act constituting a theft, robbery, mischief, or criminal trespass offence, or an attempt to commit such an offence.

This includes:

Section 102 of the Criminal Code of India

The beginning and continuation of the body's right to private defence. -The right of private defence of the body began as soon as a reasonable apprehension of risk to the body emerges from an effort or threat to commit the offence, even if the offence has not yet been committed; and it continues for as long as such apprehension of danger persists.

pertaining to the police

Article 46 of the 1973 Code of Criminal Procedure

46. How are arrests made?

In order to make an arrest, the police officer or other person performing the arrest must physically touch or restrict the body of the person to be detained, unless the subject submits verbally or physically.

If the individual violently resists or seeks to elude arrest, the police officer or other individual may use all measures required to effectuate the arrest.

Nothing in this clause authorises the execution of a person who is not accused of a crime punishable by death or life imprisonment.

300 of the Indian Penal Code – Murder

Exception 3.:

If the offender is a public servant or aids a public servant acting for the advancement of public justice, exceeds the powers granted to him by law, and causes death by doing an act that he, in good faith, believes to be lawful and necessary for the due discharge of his duty as such public servant, and without malice towards the person whose death is caused, then the homicide is not murder.

In the event that none of these laws can be invoked, the police officer responsible for the killing of the accused would be prosecuted with culpable murder under Section 299 of the Indian Penal Code. The justification for causing death during the contact will rely on the facts revealed and accepted after a thorough inquiry. Moreover, if the police personnel are convicted based on an inquiry, the deceased's family members must be compensated.

According to the Supreme Court, these are the guidelines for police encounter investigations.

State of Maharashtra (2014) 10 SCC 635 = 2015 Cri.L.J. In People's Union for Civil Liberties v. State of Maharashtra (2014) 10 SCC 635 = 2015 Cri.L.J. The Supreme Court issued the following directives in 610:

Whenever the police receives information or a tip indicating criminal movements or actions related to the conduct of a serious criminal offence, it must be committed to paper (ideally in a case diary) or electronic form.

This recording need not reveal specifics about the suspect or the destination of the party. If such intelligence or a tip is received by a higher authority, it may be recorded in some manner without disclosing the suspect's identity or whereabouts.

If, according to the tip-off or receipt of any intelligence as described above, an encounter occurs and the police party uses deadly force, resulting in a fatality, a FIR should be lodged and sent to the court under Section 157 of the Code without delay. When transmitting the Page 26 report pursuant to Section 157 of the Code, the method outlined in Section 158 must be followed.

The CID or police team of another police station will undertake an independent investigation of the event or encounter under the direction of a senior officer (at least a level above the head of the police party engaged in the encounter). At a minimum, the team conducting the inquiry/investigation must:

For the purpose of identifying the victim, colour images should be obtained;

To retrieve and preserve evidence relating to the deceased, such as blood-stained soil, hair, fibres and threads, etc.

To locate scene witnesses with complete names, addresses, and telephone numbers and to get their testimonies (including police personnel's statements) regarding the death;

To ascertain the cause, method, place (including development of a rough sketch of the area's topography and, if feasible, photo/video of the scene and any physical evidence), and time of death, as well as any pattern or practise that may have contributed to the death;

It must be guaranteed that fingerprints of the deceased are transmitted for chemical analysis in their whole. Other fingerprints must be identified, developed, lifted, and submitted for chemical examination;

Post-mortem examinations must be performed by two doctors at the District Hospital, one of whom should, wherever feasible, be the In-charge/Head of the District Hospital. Post-mortem examinations should be videotaped and kept;

Guns, projectiles, bullets, and cartridge casings should be collected and stored as proof of weaponry. Gunshot residue and trace metal detection should be undertaken whenever applicable.

The reason of death should be determined, whether it was natural, accidental, intentional, or unintentional.

In all situations of death resulting from police fire, an investigation must be conducted pursuant to Section 176 of the Code, and a report must be delivered to the Judicial Magistrate with authority pursuant to Section 190 of the Code.

Page 28 (5) The involvement of the NHRC is not required unless there are severe concerns regarding the investigation's independence and impartiality.

However, the incidence must be reported without delay to the NHRC or the State Human Rights Commission, as appropriate.

The wounded criminal or victim should get medical care, and the Magistrate or Medical Officer should record his or her statement and provide a certificate of fitness.

It should be assured that the relevant Court receives the FIR, diary entries, panchnamas, drawing, etc. without delay.

In accordance with Section 173 of the Code, the report shall be delivered to the relevant court following a thorough investigation of the occurrence. According to the charge sheet provided by the Investigating Officer, the trial must be ended quickly.

The next of kin of the suspected criminal/victim must be notified as soon as possible in the case of death.

DGPs are required to provide the NHRC with six-monthly updates on all instances involving police-involved fatalities. The six-monthly reports must be delivered to the NHRC by the 15th of January and July, respectively. The statements may be delivered along with post mortem, inquest, and, if available, inquiry reports in the following format:

Date and location of the event.

District Station, Police.

Causes of death: (a) Self-defense in a confrontation. b) During the dispersion of an unlawful gathering. b) During the process of effecting an arrest.

Concise details about the occurrence.

Criminal Case No.

Investigating Agency.

Conclusions of the Magisterial Inquiry/Senior Officers' Inquiry:

Disclosing, in particular, the names and designations of police officers if they are found to be responsible for the killing; and (b) determining whether the use of force was justifiable and the conduct was legal.

Disciplinary action must be taken against the officer and he must be placed on suspension if, upon completion of the inquiry, it is determined that a fatality resulted from the use of a firearm constituting an offence under the Indian Penal Code.

The method outlined in Section 357-A of the Code must be implemented when compensating the dependents of a victim who was killed during a confrontation with law enforcement.

Subject to Article 20 of the Constitution, the involved police officer(s) must give his/her weapons for forensic and ballistic investigation, as well as any additional evidence requested by the investigative team.

The occurrence must also be communicated to the police officer's family, who must be provided the services of a lawyer or counsellor if they require them.

No out-of-order promotions or instant valour awards shall be granted to the involved officers immediately following the event. It must be guaranteed at all costs that such awards/recommendations be given/made only when the valour of the respective officers is beyond question.

The victim's family may file a complaint with the Sessions Judge with territorial jurisdiction over the scene of the incident if it determines that the above procedure has not been followed or that there is a pattern of abuse, lack of an independent investigation, or lack of impartiality by any of the above-mentioned functionaries. Upon receipt of such a complaint, the relevant Sessions Judge shall investigate its merits and remedy the issues mentioned therein.

Guidelines For Police Encounter Investigations According To The National Human Rights Commission

In March 1997, the then-chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), Justice M. N. Venkatachaliah, emphasised that the police do not have the authority to end a person's life except in the following two instances: if the person is a threat to public safety or if the police have reasonable grounds to believe that the person is a criminal.

If the death is the result of exercising the right to private defence.

Section 46 of the Criminal Procedure Code authorises the police to use force, up to and including the use of lethal force, if required to apprehend a suspect suspected of a crime punishable by death or life imprisonment.

In view of this, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) urged all states and Union Territories to ensure that police adhere to the following set of principles in encounter killings:

Register:

When the commanding officer of a police station learns about a fatal incident, he must report the facts in the relevant register.

Investigation:

Information received shall be deemed adequate to suspect, and prompt efforts must be made to examine the pertinent events and circumstances leading up to the death in order to determine if and by whom an offence was committed, if any.

Compensation:

It can be provided to the deceased's dependents if the police officers are charged based on the investigation's findings.

Independent Agency:

When members of the encounter party are police officers from the same police station, it is acceptable to send the cases for inquiry to an independent investigating agency, such as the State CID.

In 2010, the NHRC expanded these guidelines by including the following:

Registering FIR:

When a complaint is filed against the police claiming the commission of a crime recognised as a cognizable case of culpable murder, a FIR must be registered under the applicable IPC provisions.

Magisterial Inquiry:

As soon as feasible, a magisterial investigation must be conducted in all instances when a person dies as a result of police action (preferably within three months).

Following up with Commission:

Within 48 hours of the death, the Senior Superintendent of Police/Superintendent of Police of the District should provide a preliminary report to the Commission on all incidents of police-involved deaths in the states.

Within three months, the Commission must receive a second report containing material such as the post mortem report, the conclusions of the magisterial inquiry/inquiry by senior officials, etc.

The rules issued by the Supreme Court state that the NHRC's participation is not required unless there are strong concerns that the probe was not impartial.

Conclusion

As a law student, I believe that encounter murders must be examined independently because they undermine the integrity of the Rule of Law. There is a need to guarantee that the rule of law exists in society and is adhered to by all State authorities and the populace. There is an urgent need for a comprehensive review of the criminal justice system and the implementation of necessary police reforms. We must maintain the adequate physical custody of the accused in order to prevent any act of personal retribution against police officers.

The National Human Rights Commission agrees that the police lack a standard operating procedure for responding swiftly to panic situations. Therefore, it is necessary to establish standard rules for the police personnel's training and provide them with the relevant abilities so that they can properly deal with every terrifying and stressful circumstance. The Commission has urged law enforcement officials to bear human rights in mind while interacting with arrested individuals/people.

For a few of families, the only remedy for horrific and cold-blooded acts is death. However, popular attitudes that equate sluggish legal decisions and justice with swift retaliation are neither moral nor justifiable.

Even if the ever-increasing number of crimes has produced an atmosphere of dread and pain, the death of an accused person might send the incorrect message to society. Therefore, it is the moral duty of the state to urge the police to prevent antisocial individuals while simultaneously limiting the flagrant abuse of authority. I am confident that the Indian society can abandon such unconstitutional and inhumane ideas and place complete faith in the rule of law.

[newsoutbursts]

Riberio writes to IPS officers on encounters

Riberio writes to IPS officers on encounters

Former Indian Police Service (IPS) officer and Mumbai Commissioner of Police Julio Ribeiro, 91, wrote an open letter to IPS officers on “fake encounters” and said political compulsions have changed. He also said that the custodial death in the Tuticorin district of Tamil Nadu, “is even more disturbing and every policeman in India should hang his head in shame”.

Mr. Ribeiro addressed the…

[news24fresh]

CHRI urges Allahabad High Court to institute Vikas Dubey killing probe

CHRI urges Allahabad High Court to institute Vikas Dubey killing probe

[ad_1]

The Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative’s (CHRI) India Executive Board on Monday asked the Allahabad High Court to institute and monitor an investigation into the killing of Kanpur gangster Vikas Dubey in an alleged police encounter last week.

Dubey had been on the run after being accused of ambushing and killing eight police personnel who had gone to his house in Kanpur’s Bikru…

[vilaspatelvlogs]

विकास दुबे केस को जातिवाद का रंग देने की कोशिश, अधिकारियों के झूठे सरनेम वाला मैसेज वायरल किया जा रहा

विकास दुबे केस को जातिवाद का रंग देने की कोशिश, अधिकारियों के झूठे सरनेम वाला मैसेज वायरल किया जा रहा

[ad_1]

लखन यादव, रूबी यादव और प्रदीप यादव के नामों वाला मैसेज सोशल मीडिया पर शेयर किया जा रहा

मैसेज में विकास को थप्पड मारने वाले पुलिसकर्मी और महाकाल थाना प्रभारी का नाम गलत है

दैनिक भास्कर

Jul 11, 2020, 07:53 PM IST

क्या वायरल: विकास दुबे केस से जुड़ा एक मैसेज सोशल मीडिया पर वायरल हो रहा है। इसमें तीन नामों लखन यादव, प्रदीप यादव और रूबी यादव का जिक्र है।

मैसेज में दावा किया गया है कि- विकास…

[black-box-mystery]

Vikas Dubey's one-week story begins on 2 July 2020 at around 5 pm in Bikaru village, Kanpur Dehat district of Uttar Pradesh, which is located about 125 km from Lucknow and 50 km from Kanpur. A man named Rahul Tiwari....Read More👇

https://bit.ly/2W5ZfcM

[hulnews]

Day Before His Death, PIL in Supreme Court Predicted Vikas Dubey Would be Killed in Encounter

Day Before His Death, PIL in Supreme Court Predicted Vikas Dubey Would be Killed in Encounter

[ad_1]

Gangster Vikas Dubey arrested.

Advocate Ghanshyam Upadhyay had apprehended in his plea that there is a high possibility that Dubey will also be killed in a ‘fake’ encounter after his arrest from Ujjain in Madhya Pradesh a day ago.

CNN-News18

Last Updated: July 10, 2020, 6:12 PM IST

What transpired during the encounter of gangster Vikas Dubey on Friday morning is…

[digimakacademy]

Vikas Dubey Encounter: पोलिसांची गाडी उलटली आणि काही वेळातच विकास दुबेचा कारभार आटोपला!

Vikas Dubey Encounter: पोलिसांची गाडी उलटली आणि काही वेळातच विकास दुबेचा कारभार आटोपला!

[ad_1]

कानपूर: कानपूर पोलीस हत्याकांडातील मुख्य आरोपी गँगस्टर विकास दुबे हा पोलीस चकमकीत मारला गेला आहे. एखाद्या चित्रपटात शोभेल असा त्याचा एन्काऊंटर झाला आहे. कानपूरमधील घटनेनंतर फरार असलेल्या विकास दुबेला काल रात्री उज्जैन येथे अटक करण्यात आली होती. (Gangster Vikas Dubey killed in Encounter)

गँगस्टर विकास दुबे पोलीस एन्काऊन्टरमध्ये ठार

पोलिसांनी दिलेल्या माहितीनुसार, अटक केल्यानंतर विकास…

[newsoutbursts]

Gangster gunned down in Meerut

Gangster gunned down in Meerut

Close on the heels of Vikas Dubey encounter killing, the Uttar Pradesh police late on Wednesday night gunned down gangster Deepak Siddhu in an encounter in Meerut district. According to police, a sub-inspector was injured in the incident that took place in the Rohta police station area.

Also read | Crime as punishment: The Hindu Editorial on the killing of Vikas Dubey

Deepak, a history-sheeter,…

[news24fresh]

Supreme Court to hear petitions on Vikas Dubey encounter on July 14

Supreme Court to hear petitions on Vikas Dubey encounter on July 14

[ad_1]

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court led by Chief Justice of India Sharad A. Bobde will on Tuesday (July 14) hear petitions questioning the encounter killings of history-sheeter Vikas Dubey and his associates by the Uttar Pradesh Police in response to the ambush and murder of eight police officers at Bikru village on July 3.

Also read | Vikas Dubey arrest ‘staged’: Opposition, kin of…

[abhikhabartak2297]

Proud Of UP Police: Families Of Killed Policemen Over Vikas Dubey’s Death Gangster Vikas Dubey was killed in an encounter after a road accident early on Friday morning. (File)

[raghunathpursv]

पुलिस के साथ एनकाउंटर में मारा गया गैंगस्टर विकास दुबे यूपी STF की गाड़ी के एक्सीडेंट के बाद विकास दुबे ने की थी भागने की कोशिश, एनकाउंटर में ढेर.

[hulnews]

Vikas Dubey Encounter LIVE Updates: Gangster Killed While Trying to Escape After STF Car Overturns in Kanpur, Say Cops

Vikas Dubey Encounter LIVE Updates: Gangster Killed While Trying to Escape After STF Car Overturns in Kanpur, Say Cops

[ad_1]

Lauding Ujjain police for arresting Dubey, Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan tweeted, “Those who feel that after going to the Mahakal temple, their sins will be wiped out, they do not know about the Mahakal. Our government will not spare any criminals.”

Chouhan said he spoke to his Uttar Pradesh counterpart Yogi Adityanath after the arrest. The MP police will hand…