#The Tragedy of Richard the Third

[winter2468]

Being a disabled Shakespeare fan means that sometimes you just stare at The Tragedy of Richard the Third. He's a stereotype he's deep as an ocean he's a genius he's a failure he's a lover he cannot prove a lover he's a victim he's a perpetrator he's a king he's just some guy he has no friends he would never have made it if not for his allies, "Enter Richard, Duke of Gloucester, alone."

[prosedumonde]

Tant de misères ont éraillé ma voix  Que ma langue accablée de malheurs est immobile et muette. 

William Shakespeare, La Tragédie de Richard III (The Tragedy of Richard the Third)

VO : 

So many miseries have craz'd my voice

That my woe-wearied tongue is still and mute.

[uwmspeccoll]

Shakespeare Weekend

Shakespeare’s historical tragedy, Richard the Third, is volume nineteen of the thirty-seven volume The Comedies Histories & Tragedies of William Shakespeare, published by the Limited Editions Club (LEC) from 1939-1940. The play was likely produced in 1594. It was first printed in 1597 in quarto where it was considered a tragedy, but was published in the First Folio in 1623 among the histories.  The German-born American illustrator, Fritz Eichenberg (1901-1990), was the LEC’s third choice as illustrator for this volume. Their first choice was the English painter, Frank Brangwyn (1867-1956), who accepted the project, but became too ill to begin. Their second choice was, the English painter, Edward Ardizzone (1900-1979), who was one of the British Official War Artists. Ardizzone produced a series of watercolors for the book, and they were reproduced for this publication by the lithographer Fernand Mourlot, in Paris. When the Germans invaded Paris, Mourlot was able to escape. He loyally brought with him all of the reproductions of the watercolors, which he then shipped to New York. Unfortunately, the lithographs never reached the Limited Editions Club and are presumed to be at the bottom of the ocean. 

Fritz Eichenberg said of illustrating Richard the Third: 

I think it is impossible for a modern artist to dissociate his thoughts from the events and emotions of his day... When I tried to fathom Richard’s character, it did not seem to me different from any other power-greedy, bloodthirsty usurper: be it Nero or Hitler.... The artist looks around in his world and he will find living parallels that will make those shadowy tyrants of the past come to life again. 

I looked for a technique that equaled wood-engraving in its poignant darkness and sparse highlights, something that corresponded with the nightmarish quality of the play in its gloomy darkness. I think I found the proper medium in these stone engravings, scraped out of the darkened lithograph stone with the help of diamond, knife and razorblade, wonderfully precise and willing tools in the hands of the artist, but still,  when you think of them in terms of a Richard III, just as precise instruments of bribe, murder and destruction.

The volumes in the set were printed in an edition of 1950 copies at the Press of A. Colish, and each was illustrated by a different artist, but the unifying factor is that all volumes were designed by famed book and type designer Bruce Rogers and edited by the British theatre professional and Shakespeare specialist Herbert Farjeon. Our copy is number 1113, the number for long-standing LEC member Austin Fredric Lutter of Waukesha, Wisconsin.

View more Limited Edition Club posts.

View more Shakespeare Weekend posts.

-Teddy, Special Collections Graduate Intern

[cursed-and-haunted]

web weaving for my oc, Warden

Nathaniel Orion G.K. / Crush, Richard Siken / Dazzled Precise, Anna de Noailles tr. Norman R. Shapiro / Wishbone, Richard Siken / Overflowing With Empty, Judas H. / Waterborne, Natasha Trethewey / The Night There, Mahmoud Darwish / Elm, Sylvia Plath / Amal El-Mothar / The Third Hour of The Night, Frank Bidart / Hamlet, Shakespeare / The Unabridged Journals of Sylvia Plath, Sylvia Plath / Daddy, Ramesy / Another Road in The Road, Mahmoud Darwish / @pikslasrce / Ariel, Aneleh / Tragedy, Sanna Wani / Nicola Samori / Underbelly, Nicole Homer / Beric Dondarrion

[ihaveforgortoomany]

Veryyy general look at the Story Chapters (Books? Wait genuine question are we calling the main story Books or Chapters?) and the Books / media they are based on (Global only)

(I think someone has done this already?)

Prologue: This is Tomorrow - quick search seems that the title is a reference to the 1956 London Art Exhibition that opened in the Whitechapel Art Gallery and considered a watershed in British post-art and kick starting the art movement of "Pop Art" (see the effects of the Storm having comic book like attributes)

(Richard Hamilton was a painter famous for Pop Art and had a work in that exhibition so it checks out)

Book One: In Our Time - based on a collection of short stories of the same name by Hemingway. these are stories about before, during and after WW1. The stories have a general theme of separation, loss, death, grief and alienation. (Potentially allusions to Druvis maybe?)

Book Two: Tender is the Night - this is the final completed book by Scot Fitzgerald (who wrote the Great Gatsby and referred in the beginning quote of the game) and is a tragedy that follows the deterioration of a married couple that reflects Fitzgerald's own troubled relationship with his wife who Schneider's design greatly references. (The couple in the Book either inspire Druvis and FMN's relationship or Vertin and Schneider's relationship)

Book Three: Nouvelles et Textes pour Rien. (Translation is 'Stories and Texts for Nothing') - Again a collection of stories by Samuel Beckett. Seems to be lesser known, heres from Wikipedia "All three stories deal with the deplacement or expulsion of three old men who are forced to leave their modest lives in search of a new niche they might fit" (the SPDM kids desire to learn more about themselves and the outside world)

Book Four: EL ORO DE LOS TIGRES (Translation "the Gold of Tigers") - this is even harder to find stuff on and in English,An allegoric analysis of the contemporary juvenile reality. A review of the movie based on the book- "Inspired by a J.L.Borges' collection of poems, the story recounts the survey of an individual conscience by three young men, surrounded by the nihilism of a society with a hopelessly urban future" ( the struggle between Madam Z and the suitcase fam against the oppressive Foundation maybe?)

Book Five: Prisoner in the Cave - Based on Plato's allegory of the cave

Book Six: E Lucevan le stelle (Translation "the stars are shining") based on the opera of Tosca by Giacomo Puccini in 1900, the title is a direct reference to an aria sung in the Third Act which Isolde also sings parts of.

[signify-nothing]

It's been a literal fucking decade and I still have SO MANY FUCKING FEELINGS about the season two finale of Boardwalk Empire. (Spoilers ahead because, obviously). On one hand, I mourn the series that could've been if the commodore actor hadn't gotten sick when he did and if Michael Pitt had been able to keep his act together long enough to have another season's worth of story development. It's crushing that Jimmy Darmody never got a chance to rise as a gangster and really play a strong antagonistic force against Nucky the way we hoped he would.

BUT there is also something so fucking gutsy about the writers setting up Jimmy to be such an epic, early failure. I just finished rewatching the third to last episode of season two and Jesus Fucking Christ. Watching him have his last moment with Angela? Devastating. He can't even fucking laugh with her. He doesn't even know how to be remotely normal. Then later that night she and her lover get shot for his failures, and it's EVEN MORE devastating. And then. AND THEN. We cut to Jimmy, who doesn't yet know his wife is dead at home, and he's driving past the Princeton sign -- conspicuously without Richard in sight for the first time in ages -- to try to sell his shitty, watered-down liquor to the university that symbolizes every dream he failed to realize. It's a journey he has to make alone because it is more than anything else a journey into his own past.

And to think ALL OF THIS IS JUST SET UP. It's just the opening act of the end.

I simply cannot. I'm so angry about what went down but I also have so much goddamn respect. There is a reason I wrote a whole fucking novel inspired by the end of the second season of this goddamn show. Nobody does updated Greek tragedy like Boardwalk Empire. Fucking no one.

[theelectronicstranger]

Ultimate Spider-Man Issue 2 and 3 Discussion

          It’s been a while since I talked about Ultimate Spider-Man. I’m going to be talking about Issue 2 and 3 in this post, so it might get a little hectic. If you have not read these issues, then look away now because I’m going to be spoiling a lot of it. I still think this book is a great read and I’m very much hooked on the story. I really would urge people to go out there and buy this book.

          First, I want to talk about how this series is confirmed to be taking place in real time. The first issue took place in January, the second issue took place in February and now this third issue takes place in March. I really like this decision that we’re seeing this Peter progress as Spider-Man in real time, but I feel like the issues need to be longer because of this decision (*cough* Also, they need to be longer because these new books are $4.99! *cough*). I feel like we’re missing certain interactions and I feel like some characters are not getting as much room to develop in the book because of this. Specifically, MJ and Richard. We rarely get to see them, and I just want to see them more in the book. This is more of a nitpick right now for me and not something that I’m constantly bothered by. I know they’re setting up something with MJ and Richard because they have shown them noticing things with Peter and May. Although, I just want to see more of them to get a better sense of their characters.  I also just really want more interactions with them because right now we see only Peter and May interacting for the most part.

February from Issue 2:

Pictures of Mary Jane and Richard noticing something is up with Peter and May (March from Issue 3):

          Speaking of Peter and May, I really love their dynamic; I love it whenever they’re on a page together. I love that May is pretty much the reason why Peter is even continuing this Spider-Man thing because if you really think about it, Peter doesn’t really have a reason to be Spider-Man in this universe except for what Tony Stark told him. Sure, in issue 1, it was set up that he feels like there’s something that’s been missing in his life and that he wants to do more, but this Peter doesn’t really know what this superhero thing is all about; he doesn’t really have the proper motivation to become Spider-Man like his main universe counterpart. His main universe counterpart knows that with his great power comes great responsibilities through the tragedy of losing Uncle Ben to a criminal he could have stopped. However, in this universe, that motivation is gone. Yes, you could argue that: losing Aunt May from the blast in Ultimate Universe #1; Tony saying that he’s been robbed by the Maker of a heroic future; and Tony saying that he’ll need him to free this universe of the Maker’s influence, is this Peter’s initial motivation into becoming Spider-man.

Blast from Ultimate Universe #1:

Tony telling Peter about his robbed future (Issue 1):

However, I do not think that this is enough motivation for him to keep going in this universe because he doesn’t really know what he’s doing. He literally almost quits being Spider-Man in Issue 2 because the Shocker of this Universe knocks him out twice. The first time, he was too naïve and trusted the Shocker that he would stop robbing the bank then turn himself in (Issue 2):

The second time, he believed the Shocker’s story about a dying wife, which led to him being shocked again:

The reason that Peter is continuing this Spider-Man role is because of May. He was literally coming to terms with the idea that this life was not for him after being beaten by the shocker twice until he saw May’s note on their fridge door. She is his motivation for still doing this; he’s giving it ONE MORE DAY because of May (Issue 2):

In Issue 3, we have scenes of them figuring out what Peter’s Spider-Man costume should look like, which i just found really adorable. If you have a keen eye, then you’ll notice that all of these costumes that he tries on are different variations of costumes that a Spider-Man/Person has worn before. For example, the first costume looks like the Sam Raimi Symbiote Suit, and the second costume looks like Ben Reily’s original suit but in different colors. I love that May ends up being the one that chooses the iconic Spider-Man costume for Peter. I also love that her main categories seem to be that it needs to have the spider symbol on it, and it needs to not be scary, which I just find cute, and it totally makes sense for what would be important for a child. I also love the page that comes afterwards is a page of Peter swinging around New York with May holding on behind him. It’s really just nice to see a Spider-Man that is happy with his family. I really do hope that nothing bad happens in this book in regard to Peter’s family, but it’s a Spider-Man story so the chances of something bad happening is never zero.

Trying on costumes (Issue 3):

Swinging around New York (Issue 3):

          I want to talk about Harry Osborn in Issue 3. Since the first issue, it was speculated that he was going to be the Green Goblin, so it was great to finally get confirmation that he is. We’re still not sure if he’s a good guy or not. My idea from my last discussion was that this version of Spider-Man and this version of the Green Goblin are going to have a Daredevil and Punisher kind of dynamic. Peter’s going to be the be a by the book kind of hero, where he’s not going to kill and he’s going to try to put these criminals behind bars. Meanwhile, Harry is going to be an antihero, where his version of justice is going to be a bit skewed, and he might not be opposed to killing any of these criminals. He has been attacking Wilson Fisk’s businesses in this title so far though; he’s been attacking him since Issue 1. This is just my speculation for now. Although, seeing them fight Bullseye in Issue 3 definitely made me draw those comparisons more:

Also, Harry did lose people from the blast from Ultimate Universe #1 as well, so what if Hickman is trying to show that Peter and Harry are two sides of the same coin, but Peter has this big family he can get support from while Harry doesn’t really have anyone anymore. That’s why he’s more destructive and vengeful. I don’t know if he has a wife and kids in this universe, but we do know that he lost both of his parents from the blast. As far as I know, he's alone. Also, the way he outs Peter in Issue 3 did not sit well with me. He literally had control over his costume and basically forced him to unmask himself. I guess we’ll see more of Harry in the upcoming months, but right now I’m not really feeling him as a good guy. I just hope he doesn’t become the typical sadistic Green Goblin because that would mean danger for Peter’s family.

Harry unmasking Peter (Issue 3):

          I want to talk about Jonah and Uncle Ben for a bit because they’re starting their own newspaper and it’s nice to see their insights into what’s going on in their world right now. For example, in Issue 2, they talk about Spider-Man and the Green Goblin. How the Green Goblin has been trying to kill Wilson Fisk (the Kingpin) for a month now, but nobody seems to mention his name in the Daily Bugle or anything the Kingpin owns. They’re basically burying any mention of the Green Goblin, so that the public will not think that there’s any shady thing going on in Wilson Fisk’s businesses. What they are running with and what’s front page of the Daily Bugle is Spider-Man. I like how both Jonah and Uncle Ben immediately knew that they’re using Spider-Man as a distraction from all the Green Goblin attacks. I also like how this issue shows how resourceful they both are because they literally have contacts everywhere even inside the impenetrable Wilson Fisk empire. I think Issue 2 shows how experienced these two are in their field, but also shows how these two are not afraid of Wilson Fisk and would take him head on if they could. However, that could be dangerous for the two as well because taking on the Kingpin is never a safe endeavor.

J. Jonah Jameson and Uncle Ben talking about Spider-Man and Green Goblin (Issue 2):

In Issue 3, we see their new office, which is not the best, but I really love just seeing these two old timers starting anew at their age. It kind of gives me some hope that at their age maybe I could start over if I ever needed to. Also, in this issue, Hickman kind of teases that Peter might work for Uncle Ben and Jonah once they’re all set up. I hope he does end up working for them because I think it’ll be a really interesting dynamic to see; specifically, Peter trying to hide his identity from his uncle. I just want to see that.

          That’s all I want to talk about in the book for now. Sorry it was kind of all over the place. I also kind of wanted to talk about MJ more but like I said she’s not really doing a lot right now in these past issues. I definitely feel like they’re setting something up with her and their son, Richard. I think by the end of this year they might actually find out that Peter is Spider-Man. I’m definitely still enjoying this book and I suggest that everyone get it if they’re a fan of Spider-Man. There’s a lot of stuff I didn’t talk/show as well, so you should definitely get it for that. Also, I think Marco Checchetto's art just makes this book worth buying every month.

Thank you for reading my discussion of this book! I’d love to know what you guys think of this series so far as well. How do you guys like this new Ultimate Universe? I hope you guys have a great day!

[somewhere-south-of-neutral]

I, personally, will never ship Dreamling. Not because I don't think it would work, but because I do, and I don't want to do that to Hob. It is explicitly stated that there is a metaphysical law in place that prevents Dream from having healthy relationships and that makes all of his romantic endeavors end in tragedy. Do you really want that to happen to Hob? Would you massacere my little blorbo so for your own amusement?

The only power in the Sandman Universe stronger than Hob's will to live is Dream's inability to have a good romantic relationship, and Dream's bad romantic relationships are literally the source of at least two thirds of the problems he faces. His relationship with Nada middled with her spending 10,000 years in hell and ended with the events of "Season of Mists" and Loki's escape. His relationship with Calliope middled with his son going down below (six feet under the ground below) and ended with Richard Maddox. His relationship with Thessaly BEGAN with Wanda getting killed offscreen and ended with him having to kill Reeve Carney Orpheus. All of these together led to his eventual death.

Right now, Hob is a cool, interesting person with a beutiful philosophy and a deep love of life and humanity, and you want to turn my boy into an inciting incident? Shame on you! (To clarify, I hold nothing against Dreamling shippers, and while this is my actual reason for not personally supporting the ship, all judgment is meant in jest.)

[blueiscoool]

undefined

A Gold and Megalodon Shark Tooth Necklace Found at Titanic Wreck

A lost necklace made from the tooth of a megalodon shark has been found in the iconic wreckage of the RMS Titanic.

The necklace hasn't been seen since the infamous sinking of the luxury passenger liner—considered to be the most advanced of its time—111 years ago.

The Titanic sank after colliding with an iceberg in the North Atlantic, about 370 miles southeast of Halifax, Nova Scotia on April 15, 1912. The ship was four days into her maiden voyage from Southampton, England, to New York City.

The disaster resulted in the deaths of over 1,500 people—more than two-thirds of the crew and passengers who were onboard at the time.

The story of the tragedy holds a special place in the popular imagination, having been the subject of exhibitions, documentaries and Hollywood blockbusters—including James Cameron's 1997 Academy Award-winning drama.

The necklace was found by Magellan, a company based in Guernsey, a self-governing British Crown dependency located in the English Channel, near the coast of France. The firm specializes in underwater site investigations and seabed mapping.

As part of an underwater scanning project, Magellan snapped 700,000 images of the Titanic wreck using two submarines. Using these images, the company then created the first-ever full-sized digital scan of the Titanic, providing a remarkable new view of the wreck.

Among the images captured, the Magellan team managed to spot the megalodon tooth necklace, which also contains gold.

The find was "astonishing, beautiful and breathtaking," Magellan CEO Richard Parkinson said in a statement.

Megalodon is huge shark that is thought to have become extinct around 3.6 million years ago. Considered the largest shark to have ever lived, the earliest known megalodon remains date back more than 20 million years.

Magellan didn't extract the megalodon tooth necklace from the wreck due to an agreement between U.S. and U.K. authorities that prevents such removals by members of the public.

By Aristos Georgiou.

[winter2468]

The Tragedy of Richard the Third has me constantly flipping between "yes, this is an ableist portrayal of a real-life disabled historical figure, and a lot of it is lies and propaganda" and "the system mocked him for being disabled his entire life. don't you just want to see him burn it all down. have you ever wanted to go apeshit"

[prosedumonde]

Richard Alors, dis-moi de me tuer, et je le ferai.  Anne Je te l’ai déjà dit.  Richard C’était dans ta fureur.  Redis-le-moi, et à ces mots,  Cette main qui, par amour pour toi, a tué ton amour,  Par amour pour toi, tuera un amour bien plus véritable : De ces deux morts tu seras la complice.  Anne Je voudrais connaître ton coeur.  Richard Il est peint sur ma langue.  Anne Je le crains, tous deux sont faux. 

William Shakespeare, La Tragédie de Richard III (The Tragedy of Richard the Third)

VO : 

Richard: Then bid me kill my self, and I will do it. 

Anne: I have already. 

Richard: That was in thy rage.

Speak it again, and even with the word, 

This hand, which for thy love did kill thy love, 

Shall for thy love, kill a far truer love:

To both their deaths shalt thou be accessary. 

Anne: I would I knew thy heart. 

Richard: ’Tis figur’d in my tongue. 

Anne: I fear me, both are false.

[withasideofshakespeare]

Part 1: Graphs for Tumblr's Favorite Shakespeare Play

In celebration of getting 69 (nice) responses on my Google Form (see below if you'd like to add your opinion), I will be sharing the first round of graphs!

Comedies: Much Ado is in the lead!

Much Ado is the clear winner so far with 53% of the vote (that's 35 votes!) Coming in second place is Twelfth Night with 14 votes; for bronze, we've got Midsummer with 8 votes.

The "robber's" pick for best commentary is... "It's like a drag show but with plot." (Twelfth Night) Tragedies: Hamlet is winning!

Hamlet has a nearly Much Ado-sized lead with 34 votes! Coming in second is Macbeth with 18 votes (including mine)! Third place goes to another one of the four "great tragedies", Othello, with 5 votes.

Best commentary: "I could write an entire book on why I love hamlet. In fact I am writing a book on why I love hamlet." (Hamlet)

Histories: Richard III has a narrow lead!

Richard III is winning with 14 votes, just one more than Richard II with 13! Henry V (and the St. Crispin's Day speech in all its glory) is catching up with 9 votes.

Best commentary: "i saw a version of it where they brough a 10 foot penis on stage. they rolled henry out on a giant golden toilet, wanking, it was amazing," (Henry VIII) (I feel like I need more info on that one...)

Second best commentary goes to the multiple responses that say something along the lines of "Hotspur is gay"

Romances: The Tempest takes the lead!

The Tempest is winning by a large margin with 29 votes! The Winter's Tale takes more than a quarter of the remaining votes with 16 and Cymbeline takes a distant third place with just 4 votes.

Best commentary: "most unfortunate genre"

OVERALL FAVORITE PLAY: Hamlet

Best commentary (the duality of man): "I have no regrets." and "I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry"

Rather than an image description, I'll list off the data here: FIRST PLACE: Hamlet: 18 votes SECOND PLACE: Much Ado About Nothing: 13 votes THIRD PLACE: Macbeth: 9 votes More under the cut (and some bonus content!)

7 people decided to forgo their $100 reward rather than choose a favorite Twelfth Night: 6 votes Midsummer Night's Dream and Othello: 2 votes each The Merchant of Venice, Romeo and Juliet, King Lear, Antony and Cleopatra, Coriolanus, Richard II, 1 Henry IV, 3 Henry VI, Richard III, Winter's Tale, and the Tempest: 1 vote each Bonus: Tumblr's LEAST favorite plays (no votes in any category): Comedies: -Measure for Measure -All's Well That Ends Well -Troilus and Cressida -Taming of the Shrew Tragedies: -Timon of Athens Histories: -1 Henry VI -2 Henry VI

[eluvion]

elektra natchios aesthetic

/

Villain - Searows / Never Love an Anchor - The Crane Wives / The Oresteia - Aeschylus / Antigone - Jean Anouilh (tr. Lewis Galantiere) / Planet of Love - Richard Siken / @moldavite / H of H Playbook - Anne Carson / Anecdote of the Pig - Tory Adkisson / @exigencelost / Things haunt - Joshua Jennifer Espinoza / Wishbone - Richard Siken

[ID under cut]

[Image ID:

Picture 1: Two sets of lyrics, one from the song "Villain" by Searows, and one from the song "Never Love an Anchor" by The Crane Wives. The lyrics from "Villain" say, "I started a war / I'm gonna fuck it all up / And I'll probably pay with my life / And I know you told me / That everything's fine / But I wrote this story / Before it was mine / And I know there's a villain / But I'm worried it's me this time." The lyrics from "Never Love an Anchor" say, "I am all the things they might have said to you / Do you ever think of me and my two hands, and wonder why? / They never soothed your fevers / And wonder why / They never tied your shoes / And wonder why / They never held you gently And wonder why."

Picture 2: Two quotes from the Oresteia. The first one says, "1. Enter here knowing that she is already dead." The second one says, "Orestes: (highlighted) This was always going to happen. She's been dead since the beginning."

Picture 3: An excerpt from Planet of Love by Richard Siken. It says, "so smile for the camera, it's your big scene, / you know your lines. / I'm the director. I'm in a helicopter, / I have a megaphone and you play along. / because you want to die for love. / you always have. / Imagine this: / You're pulling the car over. Somebody's waiting. / You're going to die / in your best friend's arms. / And you play along because it's funny, because it's written down, / you've memorized it, it's all you know. / Isay the phrases that keep it all going, / and everybody plays along."

Picture 4: A quote from Jean Anouilh's Antigone. It says, "In a tragedy, nothing is in doubt and everyone's destiny is known. That makes for tranquillity. There is a sort of fellow-feeling among characters in a tragedy: he who kills is as innocent as he who gets killed: it's all a matter of what part you are playing. Tragedy is restful;…”

Picture 5: A headline that says, "Calf born with third eye on forehead--but still destined for slaughter."

Picture 6: A quote from the H of H Playbook by Anne Carson. In normal text, it says, "Brief pause. I'm walking backward into my own myth." In strikthrough, it says, "I was trying to walk out."

Picture 7: A excerpt from Anecdote of the Pig by Tory Adkisson. It says, "Do you still believe myths / can save you? Foolish creature. / Let me be clear: every version of the story / ends with you being slaughtered."

Picture 8: A post from @exigencelost. It says "She's dead she's immortal she's haunting you she doesn't care about you she's muzzled she's screaming at the top of her lungs she's unnoticed she's unforgettable she doesn't have control over the story she doesn't have control over her body she doesn't even have control over her voice. And I'm obsessed with her."

Picture 9: A quote from Things haunt by Joshua Jennifer Espinoza. It says, "Things haunt. / Things exist long after they are killed."

Picture 10: A black silhouette of a man's bust with red lines extending from a gunshot hole in the middle. This silhouette is layered on a red background, the same color as the lines extending from the center of the man's bust. In fragments, a quote from Richard Siken's "Wishbone". It says, "I'll be your / slaughterhouse / your killing floor / your morgue / and final resting."

End ID]

[ghostlandtoo]

WISH FULFILLMENT — COME BACK WRONG

a mood board for a friend’s fic concept

ID:

A web weaving post feature Wolfwood and Vash from Trigun Maximum. The first image is a panel of Wolfwood biting down on glass vials in his mouth and underneath the panel is the quote: “Why does tragedy exist? Because you are full of rage. Why are you full of rage? Because you are full of grief.” The second image is spliced together panels from volume 10. The first panel is Wolfwood holding a shot glass with speech bubbles saying: [N][arrow][is][the][strai][T][.] [I am asking [You] [h][ow] to endure it.]. Next is the panel of Vash bowing over his shot glass with spec bubbles saying: On the strength of My having asked it of you. Around him are thought bubbles saying: Oh, God… God… Please do me this one favor… The third panel is Wolfwood in profile, a tear running down his cheek. A speech bubble next to him says: [I am asking [not] to endure it.] The final panel is of the gravestone placed over his grave with a cross craved into it. Around it says: Scio… Sweetheart.

The lines are from a poem by tumblr user inactics linked here.

The third image is a quote from Richard Siken: He was not dead yet, no exactly—parts of him were dead already, certainly other parts were still only waiting for something to happen, something grand, but it isn’t always about me, he keeps saying, though he’s talking about the only heart he knows—

The fourth image is a screencap of dialogue from Disco Elysium. It reads:

You – Do I remember?

Inland Empire – No, you don’t. And it’s better that way.

You – What *do* I remember?

Inland Empire – Nothing.

(in all caps by the narrator) Don’t come back here!

The fifth image is Wolfwood aiming his handgun at the back of Vash’s head, who is in the foreground. Underneath that panel is a picture of an engraved plaque with a Jenny Holzer truism on it reading: Protect me from what I want. The sixth image is the panel of Wolfwood forcing Vash to hold a gun to his head and saying “Shoot.” The panel is cut in half by a quote from Richard Siken: but I think I’d rather keep the bullet. It’s mine, see, I’m not giving it up. This way you still owe me, and that’s as good as anything. You can’t get out of this one, [] you can’t get it out of me, and with this bullet lodged in my chest, covered with your name, I will turn myself into a gun, because I’m hungry and hollow and just want something to call my own. I’ll be your slaughterhouse, your killing floor, your morgue and final resting, walking around with this bullet inside me like the bullet was already there, like it’s been waiting inside me this entire time.

The seventh image is a picture of a line from Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. It reads: (Guil) Our names shouted in a certain dawn… a message… a summons… there must have been a moment, at the beginning, where he could have said – no. But somehow we missed it. (He looks around and sees he is alone.) Rosen-? Guil-? (He gathers himself.) Well, we’ll know better next time. Now you see me, now you – (And disappears.)

The eighth image is the panel of Wolfwood and Vash sitting on the couch from volume 10. Wolfwood was been blacked out so he is just a silhouette. In the middle of his body is a block of text reading: living—despite (line break) living—against.

The final image is a dialogue box from the gamer Pathologic. The Executor is saying: I’ll tell you a story. Once there was a man who wanted to fix everything. He begged on bended knee for a chance to turn back time… And when he got it, history repeated itself. “Good job,” we told him. “That’s your fate.” He asked us, “Once more?” So we let him try once more, but with a catch. He who denies his fate will be punished.

[whatareyoudoingwithamaserati]

Billy and Stu - a tragedy in motion.

be nice to me - the front bottoms // little beast - richard siken // a primer for the small weird loves - richard siken // the accident has occurred - margaret atwood // first from peripety series - jen mazza // sense, sensibility - ajj // planet of love - richard siken // die4u - bring me the horizon // third life - martyn inthelittlewood // blood - nothing,nowhere // die4u - bring me the horizon // blood - nothing,nowhere // hearse - reuben pearl //die4u - bring me the horizon // blood - nothing,nowhere // third life - tangotek

[alicepao13]

Rating the Kommissar Rex/Il Commissario Rex/Hudson and Rex human partners for funsies, in chronological order. Contains spoilers, some bias, and opinions based on superficial characteristics. I will take the blame for any distorted memories I have of the shows, although I did a full rewatch last summer. (Rewatch refers to Kommissar Rex and Hudson and Rex. I could only watch Il Commissario Rex once. Well, 0.75 times. I couldn’t find some of the episodes.)

Kommissar Rex

Richard Moser: The blueprint. Not necessarily the best one in my opinion (although if you ask kid me, yes), but they modeled at least two other characters after him in the reboots. Pretty nice (although a product of his time), street smart, recently divorced, and the first few episodes where he and Rex are getting used to living together are hilarious. Moser’s dry humor was good too, also his whump scenes where great. And I appreciated the nude scenes a lot (thanks, German tv of the 90s). 8/10

Alex Brandtner: The hot one. Also, more of a “new age” cop (new age here means post 90s, don’t get confused). Kid me didn’t appreciate the hotness but I watched it in my teen years, and oh boy. And the action scenes, while sometimes ridiculous and making you wonder why???, really showed the actor’s training in physical scenes too. I always liked the way Brandtner immediately bonded with Rex and then we learn of the tragedy with his own dog. Too bad his love life was even more non-existent than Moser’s. 9/10

Marc Hoffmann: I’ll be honest, I just didn’t care for him for the most part, but I did like the fact that for the first time there was a ship with him and Nikki. They went for a different style with this one and it shows. Marc is less type A than the previous two, not a bad thing, but by that point, it was clear that Kommissar Rex as a show was nearing its end and I think it sometimes showed. 7/10

-----

Il Commissario Rex (At this point, let me just say that I don’t associate the two shows with each other. And whoever has watched both, would probably agree with me. It hardly matters that the Italian show starts as a spinoff.)

Lorenzo Fabbri: Ugh, I don’t know what it is with this guy but I didn’t like him much. His style was a lot like Moser at first (adopting Rex, saving him from a miserable fate, learning to live with him, etc.). I absolutely hated the storyline with the forensics scientist throwing herself at him every chance she got and him trying to avoid her instead of flat out telling her he’s not interested, and then at some point they slept together??? Anyway, did not like. 6/10

Davide Rivera: I liked that guy but sadly we didn’t have that many episodes with him. He could have had more to offer as a character. More quiet than the sometimes too loud Lorenzo, and took some time to warm up to Rex if I recall. I liked that he took no flack from his boss (Sidenote: the boss didn’t like Rex at first and kept wanting to get rid of him, and I wanted to rip him to shreds). 7/10

Marco Terzani: I literally found one season of his episodes, so I’ll reserve judgment (if anyone has his second and third season, please give it to me lol or point to the right direction). He seems kinda reckless? He’s definitely attractive. ?/10, more research needed.

----

Hudson and Rex

Charlie Hudson: Started off as kind of mediocre for me, then he made me change my mind. When I started watching, I was hellbent on comparing every single thing of this show to the characters of the original at first, so I’m partially to blame for my initial perception of him. However, I won’t blame myself for the bad writing, pacing, and overall mediocrity of S1 that contributed to a big part of it. Anyway, they used some of Moser’s backstory (divorced, adopts Rex after his K-9 partner tragically dies) and expanded on it. Charlie has had the most development as a character than any of the others, which makes sense since he’s the first of Rex’s partners to live that long or not get rebooted lol. He definitely gets bonus points for having a love life too. And for not dying, despite all the whump situations he gets himself into. Definitely falls under the reckless category too. 70% himbo, 100% whump magnet. 9/10