#Tesla Semi comparison | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

armando-ismael-arc · 2 months ago

Text

Xiaomi SU7 vs Tesla Model Y: Rivalry in the Electric Car Market

The Tesla Model Y Juniper excels in performance, range, and autonomous driving technology, while the XIAOMI SU7 offers excellent value for money, a modern design, and strong integration with Xiaomi’s product ecosystem.

In this video, we conduct a thorough comparison between the Tesla Model Y Juniper and the XIAOMI SU7, two electric SUVs competing in the market. We analyze key aspects such as design, powertrain, range, technology, and price, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle.

Both vehicles offer impressive features, but the Tesla Model Y Juniper stands out for its performance, range, and autonomous driving technology. It is the ideal option for those seeking a versatile electric vehicle with high performance and robust charging infrastructure.

On the other hand, the XIAOMI SU7 offers excellent value for money, modern design, and an interesting focus on technological integration within its product ecosystem. For those already familiar with the Xiaomi world, this SUV could be a compelling and cost-effective choice.

Key Differences Between the Tesla Model Y Juniper and the XIAOMI SU7 and How They Impact the Driving Experience:

Both the Tesla Model Y Juniper and XIAOMI SU7 are electric SUVs competing in a growing market, but they offer different driving experiences due to their distinct features.

Design:

Aesthetics: The Model Y Juniper leans toward a minimalist and aerodynamic design, prioritizing efficiency to maximize range. In contrast, the SU7 aims for a more elegant and angular urban aesthetic, seeking to stand out and catch attention.

Dimensions: Both vehicles are similar in size, with the Model Y being slightly longer (4.75 meters vs. 4.70 meters for the SU7). This slight difference could make the SU7 slightly more maneuverable in urban environments, though the Model Y, thanks to its electric platform, optimizes interior space despite its size.

Materials: The Model Y primarily uses lightweight aluminum to reduce weight and improve efficiency. The SU7 opts for a combination of high-strength steel and recycled plastics, balancing sustainability, safety, and performance.

Performance:

Power: The Model Y Juniper, in its Performance version, offers 450 hp, surpassing the 400 hp of the SU7. This difference translates into a 0-100 km/h acceleration of 3.5 seconds for the Model Y, while the SU7 takes 4.2 seconds.

Focus: While the SU7 offers competent performance, the Model Y prioritizes sportiness, especially in its Performance version. The SU7 appears to focus more on energy efficiency than pure acceleration.

Technology:

Display and Infotainment: Both vehicles feature large central touchscreen displays (15 inches in the Model Y and 14 inches in the SU7) that centralize vehicle controls. Tesla stands out for its intuitive software and OTA updates that continually improve the system. The SU7, on the other hand, focuses on integration with the Xiaomi ecosystem, allowing users to control other Xiaomi devices from the car.

Driver Assistance: The Model Y is equipped with Autopilot, an advanced semi-autonomous driving system that uses cameras, radar, and ultrasonic sensors to offer features like automatic lane changing and adaptive cruise control. The SU7 also includes an ADAS system, but it doesn’t reach the level of autonomy offered by Autopilot, though Xiaomi promises improvements through future updates.

How These Differences Affect the Driving Experience:

Model Y Juniper: Offers a more sporty and thrilling driving experience due to its higher power and acceleration. Its technology, focused on autonomous driving and connectivity, makes it an attractive option for tech enthusiasts.

XIAOMI SU7: Provides a more efficient driving experience and is deeply connected to the Xiaomi ecosystem. Its sleek and modern design makes it an appealing option for those looking for a vehicle that reflects their lifestyle.

Ultimately, the choice will depend on individual buyer priorities. If you’re looking for superior performance and cutting-edge technology, the Model Y is the best option. If you prioritize value for money, design, and integration with the Xiaomi ecosystem, the SU7 is an attractive alternative.

youtube

#Aifuturemobility #TeslaModelY #XiaomiSU7 #ElectricCars #ElectricSUV #CarTechnology #CarComparison #ElectricRange #SUVPerformance #ElectricCarPricing #ModelYJuniper #SUVBattery #FastCharging #Youtube

0 notes

kenresearch1 · 1 year ago

Text

Netherlands EV Equipment Market generated over USD 500 Mn in 2022. Will Netherland support the EV Equipment Market growth trajectory? Ken Research

Buy Now

Electric Vehicle Equipment Market in Netherlands is a moderately consolidated with highly competitive rivalry among the competitors. Netherlands EV Charging Equipment industry is catered by the domestic and international players. Allego and EV Box together contribute majority of the market share in 2022. CPO’s are battling against each other to offer multiple products, expand manufacturing units in multiple locations.

1.Tesla and Volkswagen OEM has the highest number of car registrations of 97,255 followed by Audi with 17,911 passenger cars registered in 2022.

Netherlands has become Tesla’s biggest market in Europe as Tesla model 3 and Tesla model S are among Europe’s best-selling electric vehicle models, both in terms of vehicles in operation and new car registrations. The major reason is higher tax benefit on BEV passenger cars and wide charging network of Tesla for Electric vehicle in Netherlands.

Volkswagen has shift its focus to electric cars only, from 2033 the company will only produce electric cars in Europe. Top sold Models for Electric cars are Volkswagen’s new ID.3 model and Volkswagen Golf in Netherlands.

Interested to Know More about this Report:- Request for a sample report

2.EV Charging Equipment market is one of the fastest growing markets in the Netherlands with rising players owing to the government policy to make all new vehicles zero emission by 2030

In 2010 the Netherlands was the first market in the world to launch mass-produced e-vehicles and Formula E-Team became operational.

The Formula E-Team continues in this umbrella deal with the aim of having 15,000 to 20,000 e-cars in operation by 2015, including a properly functioning infrastructure with sufficient national coverage.

Major challenges include high costs for installation & maintenance and less EV drivers in comparison to Electric vehicle infrastructure.

Visit this Link :- Request for custom report

Market Taxonomy

By Type of Electric Vehicles Vehicle

By Application

Public Charging Station

Home Chargers

Private Charging Station

Portable Chargers

By Types of Chargers

AC Charger- Slow Charger

DC Charger- Fast Charger

By Type of Charging station

Private Charging Stations

Public Charging stations

Semi-Public Charging Stations

Fast Charging station

By Application

By Geographic Demand

west

South

East

North

By distribution channels for 4W chargers

Tender

Distributors

Direct sales

Major Players Mentioned in the Report:

Vattenfall

Total Energies

Alfen

Allego

Fastned

New Motion

Tritium

EVIT

Key Target Audience

Electricity Supplier

EV Manufacturers

EV Charging Equipment Manufacturers

EV Charging System Operator

Demand side Transport Operators

Government Bodies

Time Period Captured in the Report:

Historical Period: 2017-2022

Base Period: 2022

Forecast Period: 2022-2027

For More Insights On Market Intelligence, Refer to the Link Below: –

Netherlands EV Charging Equipment Market Outlook to 2027

Related Reports by Ken Research: –

India EV Charging Equipment Market Outlook to FY2026

UAE Electric Vehicle Charging Equipment Market Outlook to 2026

UK EV Charging Equipment Market Outlook to 2027

#Netherlands Electric Vehicle Equipment Industry #Challenges #Opportunities #Major Players #Competitors #Market Trends.

1 note · View note

cavixorg · 2 years ago

Text

Lucid Motors is a luxury electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer based in Newark, California. The company was founded in 2007 under the name Atieva, and later rebranded as Lucid Motors in 2016. Lucid Motors is known for developing high-performance EVs with advanced technology and innovative design. The company's first production vehicle, the Lucid Air, is a luxury electric sedan that boasts a range of up to 517 miles on a single charge and a top speed of over 200 mph. The Air also features a spacious and luxurious interior, as well as advanced driver assist systems and over-the-air updates. In addition to the Air, Lucid Motors is also developing a range of other electric vehicles, including the Lucid Gravity, a high-performance SUV, and the Lucid Spring, a compact electric car. The company has also announced plans to build a manufacturing facility in Casa Grande, Arizona, which is expected to produce over 365,000 EVs per year once it is fully operational. Announcing its name with Lucid Motors stock price these days, Lucid Motors Inc. experiencing minor declines. Before giving information about Lucid stock price, it is necessary to start with the company. Lucid Motors, Inc. is America's most affordable electric car manufacturer. When we do research, we see that Lucid Motors was founded in 2007. Based in Newark / California, this company is chosen for the stylish and affordable cars it produces. Is Lucid a Chinese company? No, Lucid Motors is not a Chinese company. It is a US-based company founded in 2007 and headquartered in Newark, California. The company's CEO and co-founder, Peter Rawlinson, is a British-born engineer who previously worked at Tesla and served as the Chief Engineer on the Tesla Model S. Lucid Motors is focused on developing and manufacturing electric vehicles (EVs) with advanced technology and innovative design. The company's first production vehicle, the Lucid Air, is a luxury electric sedan that boasts a range of up to 517 miles on a single charge and a top speed of over 200 mph. In addition to the Air, Lucid Motors is also developing a range of other electric vehicles, including the Lucid Gravity, a high-performance SUV, and the Lucid Spring, a compact electric car. How does Lucid compare to Tesla? Lucid Motors and Tesla are both electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers that are known for developing high-performance EVs with advanced technology and innovative design. There are some key differences between the two companies: History and size: Tesla was founded in 2003 and has become a leader in the EV market, with a market capitalization of over $700 billion as of December 2021. In comparison, Lucid Motors was founded in 2007 and is a smaller company that is just starting to enter the market with its first production vehicle, the Lucid Air. Product range: Tesla offers a range of electric vehicles, including sedans, SUVs, and semi-trucks. In comparison, Lucid Motors is currently focused on developing luxury electric sedans, with plans to expand into other segments in the future. Performance and range: Both companies offer high-performance EVs with advanced technology, but there are some differences in terms of range and performance. The Lucid Air boasts a range of up to 517 miles on a single charge, which is significantly more than Tesla's current range of up to 402 miles for the Model S Long Range. However, Tesla has a wider range of vehicles with different performance capabilities, including the Model S Plaid, which has a top speed of 200 mph and a 0-60 mph time of under 2 seconds. Overall, both companies are known for developing innovative and advanced EVs, but they have different histories, product ranges, and performance capabilities. Can Lucid beat Tesla? It is difficult to predict the future of the electric vehicle (EV) market and whether or not Lucid Motors will be able to surpass Tesla in terms of market share or sales. Both companies are known for developing high-performance

EVs with advanced technology and innovative design, and they have their own strengths and weaknesses. Lucid Motors is a newer company that is just starting to enter the market with its first production vehicle, the Lucid Air. The Air boasts impressive range and performance capabilities, with a range of up to 517 miles on a single charge and a top speed of over 200 mph. The company has also developed a number of advanced technologies, including a proprietary electric drivetrain and battery management system. In comparison, Tesla is a larger and more established company with a wide range of EVs, including sedans, SUVs, and semi-trucks. The company has a strong brand recognition and a large customer base, and it has a proven track record of producing and selling high-performance EVs with advanced technology. Tesla has also built a significant charging network and has a strong presence in the global EV market. Overall, it is difficult to say whether or not Lucid Motors will be able to surpass Tesla in the EV market. Both companies are known for developing innovative and advanced EVs, and it will likely depend on a number of factors, including market demand, competitive landscape, and each company's ability to execute on its strategy. What is special about Lucid Motors? Lucid Motors is a luxury electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer known for developing high-performance EVs with advanced technology and innovative design. Some of the key features that make Lucid Motors special include: Range and performance: The Lucid Air, the company's first production vehicle, boasts a range of up to 517 miles on a single charge, making it one of the longest-range EVs on the market. The Air also has impressive performance capabilities, with a top speed of over 200 mph and a 0-60 mph time of under 2.5 seconds. Advanced technology: Lucid Motors has developed a number of advanced technologies for its EVs, including a proprietary electric drivetrain called the Lucid Electric Advanced Platform (LEAP). The company has also developed a proprietary battery management system that enables its EVs to charge faster and more efficiently. Luxurious design: The Lucid Air features a spacious and luxurious interior, with a focus on comfort and convenience. The vehicle also has a sleek and aerodynamic exterior design, which helps to improve range and performance. Sustainability: Lucid Motors is committed to sustainability and has announced plans to build a manufacturing facility in Casa Grande, Arizona that will be powered by 100% renewable energy. The company also plans to use sustainable materials in the construction of its EVs. Overall, Lucid Motors is known for developing advanced and innovative EVs with impressive range and performance, as well as a focus on sustainability and luxurious design. Leaderships / Board of Directors Peter Rawlinson CEO & CTO Sherry House Chief Financial Officer Derek Jenkins Senior Vice President of Design and Brand Eric Bach Senior Vice President of Product and Chief Engineer Michael Bell Senior Vice President of Digital Jonathan Butler Senior Vice President, General Counsel Margaret Burgraff Vice President of Software Validation Michael Carter Vice President of People Sanjay Chandra Vice President of Information Technology Jeff Curry Vice President of Marketing and Communications Gagan Dhingra Vice President of Accounting and Principal Accounting Officer Emad Dlala Vice President of Powertrain Zak Edson Vice President of Sales and Service Peter Hasenkamp Vice President of Supply Chain Peter Hochholdinger Vice President of Manufacturing Ralph Jakobs Vice President of Program Management Nicolas Minbiole Vice President of Global Quality Achim Pantfoerder Vice President of Engineering Project Management Doreen Allen Senior Director of Sales Eugene Lee Senior Director of ADAS Mustally Hussain Managing Director, Global Treasurer & Head of Financial Services

Faisal Sultan Managing Director, Global Operations Is Lucid Motors on NYSE? Many people ask questions about CCIV stock's listing on the NYSE. Lucid Motors went public in 2021 through the SPAC merger with Churchill Capital Corp IV (NYSE: CCIV). Later, these shares were transferred to LCID on NASDAQ. Shares in the company continued to attract great interest from this period onwards. It is important for investors to research price targets before buying LCID stock. You can choose a stock market that suits you to buy Lucid stock. Does Lucid Stock Pay Dividends? Let's be clear: Lucid Group (NASDAQ: LCID) does not pay dividends. Why is Lucid Stock Dropping Since it is a situation experienced by many stocks, LCID stock price may experience periodic declines.. Although investors’ sentiments are on the rise, the CCIV share price has dropped by around 4.62 percent. Lucid (ticker: LCID) stock could gain an average of 2% through Friday. However, the current decline urges investors to be cautious. Considering the declines of the S&P 500 and Dow Jones, the decrease in the CCIV share price is quite normal Is Lucid Better Than Tesla? Long Term Details and Saudi Arabia Facts Lucid Motors, which is better than Tesla in terms of charging, has a longer range. Even if we do not say yes to the answer to the question, there are sides where Lucid Motor cars are superior. Lucid Stock Price Forecasts 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2030 It is certain that CCIV stock expects more positive behavior in the next 8 -10 years. However, it is better to invest with caution. When we take a look at the Lucid Motors stock price predictions last year, we can see that the month of December 2021 was very good. Lucid stock, which saw a price above $50, was affected by the negative events later on. Shows what our Lucid Motors stock price predictions for 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2030. Lucid Stock Price Prediction 2022 There are many expert analyses of LCID stock forecast. Lucid Motors continues to increase its investments. When you take a look at the CCIV stock price prediction 2022 title, we can't say that there has been a lot of change in the Lucid share price, even though it has been 1 year. When you take a look at the Lucid Motors stock forecast price 2022 title, we can't say that there has been a lot of change in the Lucid share price, even though it has been 1 year. When we look at factors such as volume changes, comparable stocks, cost changes, market cycles, we can say that Lucid stock will enter a positive period. CCIV stock will reach $80 above price according to our Lucid stock forecast2022. Our price estimates over the years are as follows: Lucid Stock Price Prediction 2023 If we are correct in our forecasts and exceed $80 at the beginning of 2023, the CCIV share price could reach $110 by the end of 2023. Investors who want to buy Lucid Group stocks can decide within this information. Lucid Stock Price Prediction 2024 With the developing technology and the increase in the transition to electricity, Lucid stock will also get its share. According to our forecast, Lucid share price may exceed the $330 line in 2024. Lucid Motors Stock Prediction 2025 Lucid price prediction 2025 data has been interpreted by many experts. Lucid stock price, which we think will reach its peak in 2025, will increase by 150% on average. Our CCIV stock price prediction 2025 tells us about $800. Lucid Motors Stock Forecast 2030 According to expert analysis, there is a lot of data about Lucid stock price prediction 2030. The periods when electric cars will start to become widespread are exactly between 2025 and 2030 years. Electric car companies that will emerge due to the increase in competition may cause a decrease in prices. In our estimation, Lucid price prediction 2030 will be a pullback to the $480 line. It is not possible to say anything negative about CCIV stock Lucid Motors. The current declines are actually the harbingers of rises

Is it Lucid Stock is a Good to Buy? When we take a look at the data of Lucid Motors stock Yahoo site, we encounter a clear resistance level. If there is a rise from here, we can clearly see good levels. If there is a rise from here, we can clearly see good levels. According to Lucid Motors stock forecast 2030 price is $119. Lucid Motors Stock News and Lucid Motors Target Price Lucid Motors stock price fell4% in March, but recovery may come in April Empty parcel near Lucid Motors sold Investors say Lucid Motors stock price will rise by May Lucid price prediction 2030 is $119 Another product released by Lucid Motors is Lucid Air. Competitors and investors are eagerly awaiting the process of Lucid Air Dream Edition. Lucid Motors is frequently mentioned in the sector with the electric vehicle it produces. How Many Cars Did Lucid Sell in 2022? Lucid has produced over 400 EVs, and those numbers are for the end of February. According to the data we have, Lucid Motors Inc. has sold a total of 125 units in the past 2022, and a total of 300 units until the end of February.

0 notes

stocklivemarket · 2 years ago

Text

0 notes

arrancxr · 2 years ago

Note

How easy would it be to get along with the arrancar given reader is actually more powerful? Or would it be simply too hard to trust a powerhouse?

Since you said, "Arrancar", I'll do headcanons for my usual character group! o3o Feel free to ask for others once requests are open again. And I'm also writing this under the interpretation of "how would it affect a relationship". Hope that's what you wanted!

. . .

Yylfordt

Competitive bastard that he is, Yylfordt doesn't take your strength too well. He's determined to beat you somehow, and no amount of common sense stops that. He's dumb enough that his issues are less about trust and more about frustration... but every so often, he'll get a reminder that you could hurt him if you wanted to. And those shock some fear back into him. Overall, Yylfordt doesn't do too badly with your strength; he's just kind of a jerk about it.

Di-Roy

It's not exactly hard to be more powerful than him, but that doesn't really improve things, either. Di-Roy is very, very used to feeling pathetic in comparison to the people around him, so you being more powerful just fuels his usual stance of envy, fear, and resentment. And yet, at the same time, he's not against having someone so much stronger want to protect him. That's the factor that makes him get along with you better, in the end.

Tesla

He's plenty used to being around someone who could gut him in a second if provoked, so your power doesn't bother him. If anything, it's familiar in a way that helps him slip into his usual routine of semi-positive interactions. Tesla knows how to bow to those who are stronger than him (even if he's kind of awful otherwise), so your strength means you immediately get to see the better side of him— and that he has an instant level of respect for you.

Loly

She very much likes the idea of having someone so powerful around to protect her, and takes massive pride in your attention because of it. So long as you act fond of her instead of aggressive, Loly is actively enjoying your strength. Isn't she special, that you've chosen her to be the one who gets your protection and favor? It gives her a sense of security, in a way, even if she still gets instinctively nervous whenever you seem displeased.

Luppi

It's infuriating that you're so much stronger than him, and Luppi doesn't hesitate to be awful about it. If you don't show any signs of wanting to hurt him, he's a brat. However, he's still smart enough to know a threat when he sees one, so if you ever get angry with him, all of that bluster shifts to tense, defensive panic in no time. He's also proud to have you "on his side", and will use your strength as a bragging point in front of other Arrancar.

Nelliel

She doesn't care too much one way or another. You are who you are, regardless of your strength, and she trusts that you won't want to hurt her, to begin with. Nelliel tries not to pay that part of you too much mind— she wouldn't want to be feared by you if she was the stronger one, so it seems better to try to place some faith in you too. Eventually, she'll start to forget that you're so powerful at all, at least in the sense that she doesn't worry about it.

#Bleach #Yylfordt #Yylfordt Granz #Di Roy #Di Roy Rinker #Tesla #Tesla Lindocruz #Loly #Loly Aivirrne #Luppi #Luppi Antenor #Nelliel #Nelliel tu Odelschwank #Arrancar #Headcanon #Reader

56 notes · View notes

steeldontpeel · 2 years ago

Text

Facts about Aluminium Extrusion

Information mainly gathered from: https://www.simmal.com/

Before we begin to discuss the facts, let’s start with defining what extrusion actually is. To extrude something would mean you are forcing something through and out of something. The imagery I believe is a great comparison to this would be the way you extrude toothpaste from a toothpaste tube when brushing your teeth. With aluminium, it is the process in which aluminium alloy material is forced through a die with a specific profile that is cross-sectional. A powerful ram pushes the aluminium through the die, and it comes out of the opening of the die.

https://www.simmal.com/aluminium-services/aluminium-extrusion/

Origins

The extrusion process has been around since 1797 when a man named Joseph Bramah created the method. It was mainly done manually until the hydraulic press was invented in 1820. It was not until the year of 1894 that a man named Alexander Dick made the world’s very first hot extrusion process to be done without non-ferrous materials. Aluminium extraction was apparently in very high demand during both the world wars in the creation of aircraft and military machinery.

Shapes

So, what shapes can be produced during this process? Well, that is sorted into three categories:

· Solid, which has no enclosed voids or openings

· Hollow, with one or more voids

· Semi-hollow, with a partially enclosed void

Solid shapes are mainly used for things such as beams, rods, and angles. Hollow shapes are mainly used for things such as square or rectangular tubes. Semi-hollow shapes are mainly used for something called a “C” channel with a narrow gap.

See https://www.simmal.com/

Industries

The process of aluminium extrusion is one utilised by a lot of different industries out there. Just to list a few of said industries:

· Electronical

· Aerospace

· Architectural

· Automotive

· Energy

The process

The extrusion process is one that can be broken down into just ten steps:

· The extrusion die is prepared and moved to the extrusion process

· An aluminium billet is then preheated before the extrusion

· The billet is transferred to the extrusion press

· The ram pushes the billet material into the container

· The extruded material emerges through the die

· Extrusions are guided along with the runout table and quenched

· Extrusions are sheared to table length

· Extrusions are moved to the stretcher and stretched into alignment

· Extrusions are moved to the finish saw and cut to length

After this process is complete, it can be heat treated to enhance its properties. If the heat treatment is utilised, they can have various finishes to the surface which enhance their aesthetic and boost the corrosion protection. Fabrication operations can also be applied to bring them into their final dimensions.

Temperatures

In the extrusion process, the temperatures can range from 375 to 500 degrees which remain below the point of boiling for aluminium allows which is set at around 660 degrees Celsius.

Aesthetics

Aluminium extrusions are not only being utilised in the actual making of products that are related to industries such as food preparation, transportation, and space exploration. This process is now being gaining utilisation in the creation of things such as jewellery and art.

Records set

For the modern consumer, extruded aluminium has a lot of great properties to be utilised such as its increased lifespan, cost-effectiveness, and eco-friendliness just to name three. Tesla Motors’ Model S had reached a record automotive safety rating. It achieved this due to the fact it preserved 64.5% of driver residual space because of nesting multiple deep aluminium extrusions in the side rail of the car to absorb impact energy. The company Koga created a bike with a record-breaking A-limited aluminium frame that weighs just over two pounds.

1 note · View note

lihua001 · 3 years ago

Text

Cylindrical lithium battery market development

The technological progress of cylindrical lithium-ion batteries mainly comes from the innovation research and application progress of key battery materials. Through the development of new materials, the battery performance is further improved, the quality is improved, the cost is reduced, and the safety is improved. In order to meet the requirements for improving the specific energy of batteries in downstream applications, on the one hand, materials with high specific capacity can be used, and on the other hand, high-voltage materials can be used by increasing the charging voltage.

Cylindrical lithium-ion batteries have developed from 14500 to Tesla 21700 batteries. In the near and mid-term development, while optimizing the existing lithium-ion power battery technology to meet the needs of large-scale development of new energy vehicles, a new type of lithium-ion power battery will be developed. Focusing on improving its key technologies such as safety, consistency and lifespan, and simultaneously carrying out forward-looking research and development of new system power batteries.

For the medium and long-term development of cylindrical lithium-ion batteries, while continuing to optimize and upgrade new lithium-ion power batteries, focus on the research and development of new system power batteries, significantly improve specific energy, greatly reduce costs, and achieve practical and large-scale new system power batteries. application. The above is the cylindrical lithium battery market development.

Comparison of cylindrical lithium battery and square lithium battery

Battery shape: The square size can be arbitrarily designed, while the cylindrical battery cannot be compared.

Rate characteristics: Due to the process limitation of welding multi-pole lugs for cylindrical batteries, the rate characteristics are slightly worse than that of square multi-pole lug batteries.

Discharge platform: The lithium battery using the same positive and negative materials and electrolyte, in theory, the discharge platform should be the same, but the discharge platform in the square lithium battery is slightly higher.

Product quality: The manufacturing process of cylindrical batteries is relatively mature, the probability of secondary slitting defects in the pole pieces is low, and the maturity and automation of the winding process are relatively high. The lamination process is still semi-manual. have adverse effects.

Tab welding: cylindrical battery tabs are easier to weld than square lithium battery; square lithium battery is prone to false welding and affects battery quality.

PACK groups: cylindrical batteries are easier to use, so the PACK technology is simple and the heat dissipation effect is good; when the square lithium battery packs, the heat dissipation problem must be solved.

Structural features: The chemical activity at the corners of the square lithium battery is poor, the energy density of the battery is easy to decay after long-term use, and the battery life is short. The above is the comparison of cylindrical lithium battery and square lithium battery.

Comparison of cylindrical lithium battery and soft pack lithium battery

1. The safety performance of the soft-pack battery is good. The soft-pack battery is structurally packaged with aluminum-plastic film. When a safety problem occurs, the soft-pack battery will generally burst and crack, instead of exploding like the steel shell or aluminum shell battery. ; Better than cylindrical lithium battery in safety performance.

The weight of the soft pack battery is relatively light. The weight of the soft pack battery is 40% lighter than that of the steel shell lithium battery of the same capacity, and 20% lighter than that of the cylindrical aluminum shell lithium battery; the internal resistance is small, and the internal resistance of the soft pack battery is smaller than that of the lithium battery. Greatly reduce the self-consumption of the battery;

The soft pack battery has good cycle performance, the soft pack battery has a longer cycle life, and the 100-cycle decay is 4% to 7% less than that of the cylindrical aluminum shell battery;

The design of the soft pack battery is relatively flexible, the shape can be changed to any shape, and it can be thinner. It can be customized according to the needs of customers, and new battery models can be developed. The cylindrical lithium battery does not have this condition.

Compared with the cylindrical lithium battery, the soft pack battery has the disadvantages of poor consistency, high cost and easy leakage. The high cost can be solved by large-scale production, and the leakage of liquid can be solved by improving the quality of the aluminum-plastic film. The above is the comparison of cylindrical lithium battery and soft pack lithium battery.

Through the above introduction, we have learned about cylindrical lithium battery market development, comparison of cylindrical lithium battery and square lithium battery and comparison of cylindrical lithium battery and soft pack lithium battery. Next, I recommend an excellent lithium battery manufacturer, Guangdong Lithium Hua New Energy Technology Co.,Ltd. This is a company specializing in the production of new Manufacturers of energy batteries, you can rest assured to buy products from this company .

0 notes

dallas-alset-auto · 3 years ago

Text

Will Tesla Still Be Around In 5 Years?

In February Elon Musk released a Tesla electric sports car into area on the powerful new Falcon Heavy rocket, and also Tesla also reported its 4th quarter earnings, which narrowly defeated expert price quotes. The company's revenue rose to $3.288 billion, from $2.284 billion a year earlier. Both of these occasions show Tesla's prospective as well as sheer audacity. Yet, these headline getting events do not alter the truth that the business is hemorrhaging red ink, shedding $1.9 billion for complete year 2017, and also those sheds will certainly raise even better in 2018. In addition, during their earnings teleconference, business officials attempted to tamp down assumptions for 2018, citing battery supply constraints and production delays at their brand-new state-of-the-art Gigafactory. The Tesla Gigafactory, still partly under construction, lies near the unincorporated neighborhood of Clark, Nevada, in north Floor Area, about 17 miles east of Reno. Building and construction on the facility is anticipated to be completed by 2020.

According to David Trainer the Chief Executive Officer of New Constructs, an equity research company, Tesla has actually been afflicted by production troubles from the very start, from its very first car, the Roadster to the present Design 3. The Roadster really used an AC motor initially developed in 1882 by Nikola Tesla himself. Additionally, Instructor wrote in a recent short article that the Design 3 manufacturing issues likewise led to the delay of the launching of Tesla's initial business vehicle, the new electrical semi-truck. Even more, Instructor mentions that while Tesla promises the moon and even Mars, the business remains to have problem with standard manufacturing and also production. Tesla's main automobile manufacturing center remains in Fremont, California. Furthermore, Tesla's bothersome production delays aren't occurring in a vacuum cleaner. There is enhancing competitors in the electrical lorries (EV) arena. The Chevy Screw outsold all Tesla versions integrated last October, as well as Chevy delivered over 23,000 Screws in 2017. Tesla plainly needs to repair its production problems, or some on its long waiting checklist of EV consumers may desert it for even more conveniently available choices. Tesla rapidly acquired 373,000 pre-orders for the Design 3, billing $1,000 simply to jump on the waiting listing.

However, Tesla, based in Palo Alto, California, does have solid fanatics, and also is currently noted, as of 2017, on Statista's Leading 10 A lot of Belongings Brands within the automotive market worldwide. Tesla made it right into the ranking for the very first time in 2014, as well as the Tesla brand alone is valued at $5.88 billion. By comparison, Toyota was placed as the world's most important car brand name in 2017, with a brand name worth of $23.5 billion. Tesla likewise produced its 300,000 th vehicle in February 2018. Plus Tesla's brand-new heavy-duty electrical vehicle is absolutely a potential game changer. The electric trucks made their "very first production freight trip," moving battery packs from Tesla's Gigafactory in Nevada to the company's car-assembly manufacturing facility in Fremont on Wednesday, March 7th. Tesla is currently taken into consideration to be a particular niche, high-end car maker, and not a commercial truck manufacturer. Nevertheless, when Tesla first revealed its smooth electric semi-truck in November, and announced that they were entering the $719 billion freight shipping market, the information promptly produced enthusiasm for the electric truck, which will certainly have a variety of 500 miles per charge, and also can increase from 0-60 mph in five secs. Although complete production isn't expected to start till 2019, firms are already placing orders for the electrical eighteen-wheeler. Walmart, Meijer, a Michigan-based grocery store chain, J.B. Search Transport Services, Pepsi, as well as Anheuser-Busch have all placed orders for the Tesla Semi, taking down a $5,000 down payment for each truck, according to CNN Cash. The electrical truck will certainly more than likely be made use of for brief hauls, yet the Tesla Semi is likely to make some waves in the sector, CNN Cash's auto master Peter Valdes-Dapena explained. Additionally, some extreme fanatics say Tesla is the next Apple Inc. Nonetheless, Apple is not tormented by the consistent manufacturing headaches that Tesla can't seem to conquer. Among Tesla's vital manufacturing worries is restricted battery availability. Panasonic currently produces the batteries for Tesla automobiles. However the battery currently being produced is an older innovation and also there are most likely no other vehicle volume buyers for this modern technology other than Tesla. As well as because of that Panasonic likely does not want to broaden manufacturing capability of that battery, especially given that Tesla intends to switch to a new battery at some time in the second half of 2018, according to a Looking for Alpha article. Moreover, these problematic capacity concerns and also production delays have created Tesla's operating budget to escalate. Click over here tesla ceramic coating

As well as speaking of rising expenses, Tesla plans to honor chief executive officer Elon Musk an approximated $2.6 billion in lasting settlement. Considering that the company has yet to make a profit, this enormous rise in compensation has increased some brows, and produced unfavorable comments from some financiers. If the company was currently rewarding, this would not be a cause of problem. Tesla additionally mentioned that its ultimate objective was to reach a market capitalization worth of $650 billion, the firm's present market cap is $56.6 billion. Talk about swinging for the fencings, this is an exceptionally enthusiastic goal. To put things into viewpoint, Toyota's market cap is presently $185.7 billion, as well as they gain $15 per share. Nevertheless, Tesla presently loses -$11.83 per share, and failing to fulfill manufacturing targets with its brand-new Model 3 has greatly enhanced its costs. And without a doubt Tesla's self-contained spending is somewhat startling to several of its investors. Tesla's aggressive costs has actually been previously tested by Tesla shareholders. When Tesla accepted obtain SolarCity Corp, the largest installer of rooftop solar systems in the US, for $2.6 billion in August 2016, investors filed a lawsuit. SolarCity was co-founded by 2 of Musk's cousins, and the complainants alleged that the Tesla board of directors, of which Musk is the chairman, breached their fiduciary tasks in accepting the purchase. Tesla's current price of costs is so aggressive that the firm is predicted to lack cash money by Monday August 6, 2018, according to motor1.com. Nonetheless, with large looming financial debt repayments due and also Capex commitments, Tesla will probably take another look at the capital markets at some time in the first Fifty percent of 2018, to replenish its money reserves via a bond offering.

Tesla clearly believes that aggressive investing is an essential methods to reach their supreme goal.

"Yes. It's also like for any type of given facility produced item, in order to go past the overall ability, you truly require to move the entire supply chain in cadence ... There need to be financial investments in new lines or it's mosting likely to require overtime, which negatively influences gross margin," claimed Musk, in their incomes conference call. Likewise, according to Looking for Alpha, Tesla has strongly discounted its Model S as well as Model X vehicles to maintain the sales degrees. And because of these discount rates, they are racking up greater losses. Tesla's diminishing cash money setting makes steeper discounting an untenable alternative. As well as further issues consist of the surge in interest rates as well as asset rates, cobalt rates have skyrocketed from $10 an extra pound to above $37. Along with these cost increases, the current resignation of their chief accounting officer and controller, Eric Branderiz certainly made a couple of financiers anxious. He isn't the only prominent departure, a month previously John McNeill, that was head of the sales and service group, resigned from the business. Bloomberg reported that Branderiz, that was hired in October 2016, had a base salary of $300,000 each year. Possibly his most appealing benefit was a $5 million stock equity honor, to be completely vested only after 4 years of service. This plainly suggests that Branderiz, regardless of his factors, left a great deal of cash on the table with his very early separation. These growths absolutely make the scenario much more made complex for a firm that is aggressively accumulating debt.

According to David Instructor of New Constructs, Tesla hypes itself as being long-lasting concentrated, however it appears that the firm spends even more effort and time on publicity stunts, such as sending a Roadster to Mars, than on accomplishing its own manufacturing targets. He added that if Tesla can't strike basic production targets, it's hard to take them seriously about anything. Additionally, Instructor sees Tesla as a far-off opposition to the leading car firms such as Ford and also Toyota. And while Tesla might have the competitive advantage with its premium quality electric cars in the EV market today, Tesla will begin to face increasing competition from the extra well-known car makers. Furthermore, competition will likely enhance drastically in the EV market over the following two decades, according The Financial expert magazine. The publication reported that while today the EV market only makes up a small niche of vehicle sales, about 1.5% of the new-car market in America and 1% of autos offered worldwide, the EV market will certainly explode to between 10% and 15% of the marketplace by 2025. And this is simply the beginning, the indications are that possibly the European Union will certainly disallow all oil and also gasoline vehicles by 2035, and the western European car market will come to be totally electrical. Further, Britain, France as well as China have all just recently revealed that all internal-combustion engines will certainly banned from their roadways by 2040.

The around the world car market will certainly change by stunning jumps as well as bounds over the next twenty years. A number of car makers such as Honda, Toyota, Hyundai, GM, Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen are hedging their bets with hydrogen fuel-cells, instead of going all-in on cars and trucks powered just by a lithium-ion battery. Mercedes will soon present a plug-in hybrid SUV that integrates a battery pack with a fuel-cell generator. So the next step in crossbreed modern technology is an electric vehicle with the ability of creating its own electrical power with a fuel-cell. Elon Musk mentioned in 2015 that fuel cells for use in cars and trucks will never be commercially viable due to the fact that of the inadequacy of creating, delivering and also saving hydrogen.

Concerning Tesla's stock itself, the business released its IPO on June 29, 2010, trading on the NASDAQ, under the ticker icon: TSLA. It was originally offered at a price of $17 per share. A $1,700 purchase (100 shares) at the IPO price would certainly have grown to just under $35,000 today. The stock carried out remarkably in 2017, rocketing up from a reduced of $178.19 in November of 2016, up to a new all-time high of $389.61 in September of 2017. Since then, the supply has been embeded a sideways loan consolidation, jumping backwards and forwards in between $292.63 and also $360.50. Any kind of continual selloff might push the supply down to its 200-Week moving standard, this vital support degree is currently around $251.

The 200-Week relocating typical proved to be an optimum place to purchase shares on 2 previous occasions. Conversely, offered the unusually high amount short rate of interest in TSLA, a breakout above $389.61 can conveniently send the supply skyrocketing over $500 quickly. TSLA would certainly be moved greater, aided by a brief capture that would certainly send short sellers scampering to acquire shares to cover their brief placements. A brief sell is a bet against a stock, and short vendors revenue when the rate of a supply decreases. TSLA is plainly a supply that brief vendors enjoy to dislike. Currently the short interest in TSLA amounts to approximately 30 percent of the shares offered for trading (the float). Comparative, the short passion for Ferrari NV (NYSE ticker icon: RACE), which Financier's Business Daily rates as the very best stock in the Car Manufacturers Team, is just 3.5 percent. As well as the brief rate of interest in RACE has actually remained reduced, also after the supply soared 80 percent to $131.20. Probably the brief sellers are not as passionate about shorting the stock of a business that in fact makes a $3.50 per share profit, and pays a. 69 cent per share returns. It needs to likewise be kept in mind that in January at the Detroit vehicle program, Ferrari chief executive officer Sergio Marchionne claimed that Ferrari NV will make a new battery-powered supercar to test Tesla Inc. at the luxury of the electrical car market. Marchionne additionally said that the time is right for a shift in the sector, which by 2025 less than half the cars and trucks sold will be combustion-powered, as gas as well as diesel pave the way to hybrid, electrical and also fuel cell drivetrains. He likewise predicted that car makers will certainly have less than a decade to change themselves to make it through in the world of new innovations.

1 note · View note

douglashonorscollege · 4 years ago

Text

The Tesla Titan

research paper by David Wacker ⌂

Part I: The Tesla Titan

“Tesla Titan, he’s a hero! Gonna bring emissions down to zero!” Now that may be a clear rip off of the classic Captain Planet theme song, but the Tesla Titan deserves the same recognition as the beloved pollution fighter. The Tesla Titan is not only stopping the crimes of fossil fuel overconsumption and outdated automobiles, but also making space travel less environmentally destructive. Reusable rockets have decreased cost and waste by a big margin. He has also promised that moving to Mars in the future is possible. Though he wouldn’t be able to do all of these amazing feats if it weren’t for his infinitely smart Artificial Intelligence by the name of OpenAI (needs a better nickname). It is said that Tony Stark himself went to the Tesla Titan for pointers on how to be a world-saving superhero. The Tesla Titan keeps giving more and more to our wonderful planet; he is a true hero and spectacle.

His only flaw would be that he hasn't done a good job at keeping his identity hidden. Just about anyone with a WiFi connection knows the Tesla Titan’s real name which of course is Elon Musk. Musk is one of the richest people on the planet, and he has been doing his best to use it for good! The Tesla Titan’s Origin Story begins in the country of South Africa, where he began toying using computers at a young age. At the young age of twelve he sold a video game he had developed to a magazine company. It was a space-themed “shoot-em-up” called Blastar, and it made the future billionaire a cool 500 dollars. You can actually play it in your browser now with a little digging.

At the age of seventeen, while continuing to get more adept with computers, Musk decided to get a Canadian passport. His reasons were based around not wanting to support apartheid—a segregation order in South Africa—with military service as well as chasing better economic opportunities in North America. He first attended Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario, but then transferred to the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, where he earned two bachelor’s degrees. From there, Musk went to Stanford for graduate school, quitting after a mere two days. He thought that the future was with the internet, and he was correct; in a relatively short amount of time, Musk sold his first online company, Zip2, for 309 million dollars (Gregersen).

Elon Musk, aka the Tesla Titan, has become a dominant figure in the tech industry over the past decade, and for good reason, too. He has brought about paradigm shifts in many different fields with relative ease. This is a result of his influence that he has gained over the years. He has the capability to alter public thinking quicker than it would otherwise change. A paradigm shift is comparable to a scientific revolution, something that generally requires a lot of marketing, money, and, usually, time. Throughout this essay I will compare his ability to sell products to the abilities of the Marvel character Tony Stark, aka, Ironman. Both have helped invent and create amazing pieces of technology. They also have much success selling these technologies, and the similarities go on and on.

The Tesla Titan gets his name after the electric car company he co-founded and where he continues to hold the title of CEO. The car company was founded in 2003 with the idea of fun-to-drive electric vehicles in mind. They launched their first full electric vehicle in 2008, named the Tesla Roadster. The Model S was launched in 2012, becoming the best in its class in every category. The company has released many more vehicles over the years, and just last year, it announced the Cybertruck, which currently has over 650,000 orders. Tesla is also close to releasing a self-driving semi-truck, which promises a 500-mile range on a full charge. From Tesla’s beginning right up to today, “Elon leads all product design, engineering and global manufacturing of the company's electric vehicles, battery products and solar energy products” (Tesla).

Recently, Tesla became the highest valued car company in the world, reaching an estimated $208 billion value in July of 2020. It is now being valued at $387 billion by Yahoo Finance today, with the possibility of another jump in value after it was announced that Tesla is joining the S&P 500. In its seventeen-year lifetime, Tesla became the forefront of electric vehicles, and it has reached farther than any other car brand before it.

Although Tony Stark never released his own brand of vehicles, he is known to be the owner of many expensive sports cars. He also created the Model 52 Iron Man Armor, which could fully transform into a flying car, equipped with two circular jets on the bottom to keep it off the ground. So there’s some comparisons to be made between these two men. In the movie, Spiderman: Homecoming, a Stark Cargo Plane is robbed. Where this might not be the best example of its abilities, it still has the capability to cloak itself and stay off radar. So they both have their experience in transporting goods.

The Tesla Titan’s highest reaching feat is SpaceX, which he founded just a year before Tesla. SpaceX has also reached the forefront in its field of sending rockets to space and, now, landing them back on earth. Falcon 9 was the first ever successful landing of an orbital rocket booster back in 2015. Since then, there has been nowhere to go but up! Following the Falcon 9 was the Falcon Heavy in 2018 and then the revolutionary Super Heavy Starship System this year. The Starship System can carry a total of 220,000 pounds. It is designed to travel quickly to different cities around the globe. It doesn’t stop there, though; the System was also built with the idea of transporting supplies and people to and from the Moon and Mars. It does all this at a fraction of the cost of SpaceX’s closest competitor, Boeing. SpaceX has even transported multiple astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS) with its Dragon spacecraft (Gregersen). Just recently, four astronauts were successfully transported to the ISS in association with NASA (Wattles).

A clear paradigm shift occurred when Falcon 9 became the first booster to land itself back on Earth. A mere thirteen years after its founding, the company managed to break a barrier no one had come near breaking before. The main thing that Tesla and SpaceX have in common is their fearless leader, The Tesla Titan. With the amount of success that Elon Musk has had over just the past two decades in these two fields, a connection has to be made with his influence. After so many successes, it would be hard for the world not to believe in his hero-like abilities being behind some of today’s paradigm shifts.

Connecting this to Tony Stark comes a little easier than comparing a single transforming car suit. Stark Industries has connections to the creation of the original Helicarrier that is used by the S.H.I.E.L.D. organization. Tony proposed the original idea to S.H.I.E.L.D., and with the help of Dr. Reed Richards and the former Xman Forge, they were able to design and eventually build the aircraft. Not that readers are able to see much of it, but there has also been a mention of the Stark Industries Aerospace Division, which supposedly created the first spaceship capable of space travel. It was first brought up in Iron Man, Vol. 1, #60, back in 1973, but not much has been said about it since.

Finally, the last evidence I will provide for The Tesla Titan’s ability to perform paradigm shifts in a single bound comes in the form of Open AI. He founded the company alongside Sam Altman and others with a beginning pledge of one billion dollars. Since its inception, the company has worked on many different AI-related projects, from a fully AI Dota 2 team that regularly beats the best of the best human teams, to slightly less impressive—when it comes to competitive gaming—but still impressive bipedal AI simulations that learned to sumo wrestle one another. Moreover, Open AI developed an AI-trained robot hand that can solve a Rubik’s Cube. Then there’s the music generating AI, Jukebox, that has its own Soundcloud. But maybe the most impressive use so far is GPT-3, a unique text-suggestion software that can gather data in split seconds and fill out a full Excel sheet with data after a simple topic search and a few button presses.

In 2018, Musk left the company’s board but still remains a donor. He left the company because of possible future contests between it and the AI that runs his Tesla vehicles’ self-driving. While he might not be with the company anymore, the amount the company accomplished while he was associated with it is still nothing to scoff at. This is another great example of how someone of his status and income can significantly increase the rate of technological progress.

These accomplishments provide the easiest area to find similarities between The Tesla Titan and Iron Man. Both have their hands in the super intelligent AI basket. Tony Stark, of course, has his AI-assistant Jarvis with him wherever he goes, whether it’s in a pair of super fancy Heads-Up Display Glasses, in his massive super smart home, or of course while he’s in his trademark Iron Man suits. Jarvis is used for instant information, hacking, and even controlling certain aspects of the various Iron Man armors.

In the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Jarvis ends up inhabiting a Vibranium-based body that eventually leads to him becoming Vision. The body was constructed under the instruction of another super AI, Ultron, who intended on using the body as his most powerful form yet. As some will know, Ultron turns out to be an evil Artificial Intelligence with the classic, “exterminate the human race” mindset. Thinking quickly, Stark puts Jarvis into the body so it cannot be inhabited by Ultron. Vision is “powered” by the Mind Stone (one of the six world creating Infinity Stones) which gives Jarvis full sentience.

My claim earlier about Tony Stark going to Elon Musk for inspiration was not that far fetched. Robert Downey Jr. did in fact go to Musk for tips on how to play the super-rich, tech playboy that is Tony Stark. And this completely makes sense, as The Tesla Titan is very comparable to Marvel’s Iron Man. It is a good thing that The Tesla Titan is on the good side, as it would be quite dangerous if he suddenly turned evil. He would have all the money and equipment he could need to possibly take over the world…

Part II: Neuralink The Nefarious

Neuralink The Nefarious, comes from a different timeline than The Tesla Titan, a timeline where the man behind the mask chooses to use his influence for evil rather than good. Neuralink The Nefarious sees the world as being infected by the parasite that is the human race, and he plans to use whatever resources he has—and he has plenty of resources—to expel the Earth of its sickness. But he won’t stop there—why conquer one planet, when you can conquer two, plus a moon? He develops spaceships with the cover story of cheaper space travel and commercial use for everyone. Behind the scenes, though, he schemes in the shadows. Along with his plans for stealing worlds, he is developing his mode of extinction for the human race in the form of mind-altering brain implants, which he markets as a possible cure for previously incurable diseases. The idea of self enhancement can drive practically anyone to madness, and he feeds on that desire. The implants are said to also provide information to the user just by thinking. While he’s at it, he has also sold “Not Flamethrowers” to the general public, another tool in his master plan. Neuralink the Nefarious will stop at nothing to become the Earth’s one true owner.

This section of the essay will go over how not only does Elon Musk have similarities to those of Superheros, but he is also very capable of becoming a super villain. I will also go over the idea that when paradigm shifts do happen so quickly because of his influence, Technological Disjunction is rarely part of the equation. Technological Disjunction is what happens when society doesn’t fully agree with a new technology that is being developed. For example, the use of drones by the public—many people worried about personal privacy. This has led to many regulations, including the requirement that the operator have a license to fly their drone over another’s property. Without a lot of technological disjunction, products that maybe should not be put on the market become available. Throughout this portion of the essay, I will compare Musk’s projects to multiple villains spread across pop culture, comparing their views and evil plans with those of Neuralink the Nefarious.

Once again, Neuralink the Nefarious gets his name after one of his evil companies. Elon Musk founded Neuralink in July 2016, with a goal of solving paralysis and improving the human being by tampering with neurons in the brain. The “link” will be implanted into the person’s head with very thin “neural threads” reading interactions between the neurons that are used for movement in the brain. Their plan is to begin by creating a wireless link between users’ brains and their mobile devices: “The Neuralink app would allow you to control your iOS device, keyboard and mouse directly with the activity of your brain, just by thinking about it” (Neuralink). As Neuralink learns more from its different iterations, the ability to help those with paralysis and other disabilities comes next. Or so they say.

I believe that Neuralink the Nefarious got this idea straight from the 2014 Action Film Kingsman: The Secret Service. The film’s antagonist is Richmond Valentine, a rich tech mogul looking to provide the world with “Free Calls, Free Internet, For Everyone, Forever.” He does so by implanting a chip directly connected to the brain. Sound familiar? It is later revealed that Valentine had an ulterior motive with his fancy Wi-Fi chips; not only do the chips provide said services, but they can also be used to make everyone who has one go into a murderous rage. So he markets and sells the chips around the world, and most of the first world ends up with one within a matter of a few weeks. He then activates their murder function and anyone with a chip begins doing whatever they can to hurt and kill everyone around them. Then of course the protagonist saves the day, but that’s besides the point. The point is this: if Neuralink the Nefarious really is inspired by Valentine—or vice versa—who knows what else these “links” will do to us.

A few months after founding Neuralink, Musk founded the Boring Company whose primary goal is to devise and create new methods of transportation. They plan to market underground tubes made for getting places quicker. However, for this essay, I will be focusing on one of the Boring Company’s previous products: in 2018, The Boring Company sold “Not a Flamethrower” to anyone who had a 500 dollars to burn. The 20,000 units sold out, generating ten million dollars for the company. Selling items similar to a flamethrower to the public doesn’t sound safe, obviously, as there is always the distinct possibility of someone wielding one with evil intentions.

I was not able to find a villain that specifically sold flamethrowers to the public. However, there is Norman Osborn, a prominent figure in New York, who is the head of Oscorp, which is a leader in various technologies. Behind the scenes though, Norman is the Green Goblin, one of Spiderman’s oldest foes. After taking an intelligence- and strength-enhancing serum, Osborn ends up going insane, which spurs his liking of destruction. I wouldn’t put selling flamethrowers off the radar for Mr. Osborn, whatever it takes to drive the city to the ground. Neuralink the Nefarious was pretty unique with this one, selling flamethrowers to almost anybody is something not many super villains have thought of, perhaps making him more villainous than the most evil of super villains.

These two companies of his are prime examples of technological disjunction being forgotten. Through vigilant marketing, economic class, and a wide influence, Elon Musk and his reputation have survived, even thrived, where others would have found themselves in the proverbial doghouse. Of course there will always be articles about how what he is doing is wrong, but they haven’t been impactful enough to keep Musk from continuing his work. He has accomplished so much that it has become hard to stop his Neuralink the Nefarious side—if it exists.

Conclusion

Whether we are in the Tesla-Titan or the Neuralink-the-Nefarious timeline, Elon Musk has made major strides in whatever line of work he steps into. His companies have accomplished more in under twenty years than many have accomplished in over 100. There are so many more examples from his life to support both sides of this argument, but I ultimately align myself with the Tesla Titan, not only because he’s the good guy but because there is more evidence for Elon being “good” rather than “bad.” I appreciate his thoughts on renewable energy and his efforts to save the planet from climate change. While I was writing this, my dad sent me an article about the announcement of ZETA, a group of electric vehicle manufacturers, including Tesla, arguing for no more sales of fossil fuel-powered vehicles by 2030, moving our world closer to the electric vehicle paradigm.

To reiterate, Elon Musk is in a special place in the science world. He is highly intelligent and very well known, giving him the power to trigger paradigm shifts in pretty much every industry he touches, which so far has been for the positive. But if he continues to avoid Technological Disjunction, he could potentially turn toward evil, which could negatively impact all of humanity. It’s the job of the public to keep figures like Musk in check, to make sure they remain the Tesla Titans rather than become Nefarious Neuralinks.

Works Cited ~Brockman, Greg. “OpenAI API.” OpenAI , OpenAI, 28 Sept. 2020, openai.com/blog/openai-api/. ~CB Insights. “8 Industries Being Disrupted By Elon Musk And His Companies.” CB Insights Research , CB Insights, 21 Sept. 2020, www.cbinsights.com/research/report/elon-musk-companies-disruption/ ~Chandler, Simon. “Elon Musk Is 'Distracting Us' From Real Tech Issues, AI Figures Warn.” Forbes, Forbes Magazine, 19 May 2020, www.forbes.com/sites/simonchandler/2020/05/18/elon-musk-is-damaging-te ch-and-the-tech-industry/?sh=6206e5e19b8d. ~“Elon Musk.” Tesla, Inc , www.tesla.com/elon-musk. ~Evannex. “A Transportation Paradigm Shift Is Coming Thanks To Tesla's Elon Musk.” InsideEVs , InsideEVs, 22 Feb. 2020, insideevs.com/news/400142/tesla-elon-musk-transportation-paradigm-shift ~Fandome Contributors. “Iron Man Armor Model 52.” Marvel Database , marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Iron_Man_Armor_Model_52. ~Fandome Contributors. “Norman Osborn (Earth-616).” Marvel Database , marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Norman_Osborn_(Earth-616). ~Fandome Contributors. “S.H.I.E.L.D. Helicarrier.” Marvel Database , marvel.fandom.com/wiki/S.H.I.E.L.D._Helicarrier. ~Fandome Contributors. “Stark Industries Aerospace Division/Appearances.” Marvel Database , marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Stark_Industries_Aerospace_Division/Ap pearances. ~Gibbs, Samuel. “Elon Musk Sells All 20,000 Boring Company 'Flamethrowers'.” The Guardian , Guardian News and Media, 1 Feb. 2018, www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/feb/01/elon-musk-sells-out-boring-c ompany-flamethrowers-fire. ~Gregersen, Erik. “Elon Musk.” Encyclopædia Britannica , Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 27 Aug. 2020, www.britannica.com/biography/Elon-Musk. ~Hern, Alex. “Elon Musk: the Real-Life Iron Man.” The Guardian , Guardian News and Media, 9 Feb. 2018, www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/feb/09/elon-musk-the-real-life-iron- man. ~Klebnikov, Sergei. “Tesla Is Now The World's Most Valuable Car Company With A $208 Billion Valuation.” Forbes , Forbes Magazine, 1 July 2020, www.forbes.com/sites/sergeiklebnikov/2020/07/01/tesla-is-now-the-worlds- most-valuable-car-company-with-a-valuation-of-208-billion/?sh=6d99944f5334 ~Neuralink , neuralink.com/. ~“Not A Flamethrower.” The Boring Company, www.boringcompany.com/not-a-flamethrower. xxx Peterson, Andrea. Even Elon Musk Knows He's a Good Supervillain Candidate . 25 Apr. 2019, www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2015/04/17/even-elon-musk- knows-hes-a-good-supervillain-candidate/. ~“Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) Valuation Measures & Financial Statistics.” Yahoo! Finance , Yahoo!, 18 Nov. 2020, finance.yahoo.com/quote/tsla/key-statistics/?guccounter=1. ~Vaughn, Matthew, et al. Kingsman: the Secret Service . 20th Century Fox, 2015. ~Wall, Mike. “Wow! SpaceX Lands Orbital Rocket Successfully in Historic First.” Space.com , Space, 22 Dec. 2015, www.space.com/31420-spacex-rocket-landing-success.html. ∎

More on David ~ Minerva’s Owl Homepage

#journal #journal2021 #2021

0 notes

orbemnews · 4 years ago

Link

Tesla’s Autopilot Technology Faces Fresh Scrutiny Tesla faced numerous questions about its Autopilot technology after a Florida driver was killed in 2016 when the system of sensors and cameras failed to see and brake for a tractor-trailer crossing a road. Now the company is facing more scrutiny than it has in the last five years for Autopilot, which Tesla and its chief executive, Elon Musk, have long maintained makes its cars safer than other vehicles. Federal officials are looking into a series of recent accidents involving Teslas that either were using Autopilot or might have been using it. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration confirmed last week that it was investigating 23 such crashes. In one accident this month, a Tesla Model Y rear-ended a police car that had stopped on a highway near Lansing, Mich. The driver, who was not seriously injured, had been using Autopilot, the police said. In February in Detroit, under circumstances similar to the 2016 Florida accident, a Tesla drove beneath a tractor-trailer that was crossing the road, tearing the roof off the car. The driver and a passenger were seriously injured. Officials have not said whether the driver had turned on Autopilot. NHTSA is also looking into a Feb. 27 crash near Houston in which a Tesla ran into a stopped police vehicle on a highway. It is not clear if the driver was using Autopilot. The car did not appear to slow before the impact, the police said. Autopilot is a computerized system that uses radar and cameras to detect lane markings, other vehicles and objects in the road. It can steer, brake and accelerate automatically with little input from the driver. Tesla has said it should be used only on divided highways, but videos on social media show drivers using Autopilot on various kinds of roads. “We need to see the results of the investigations first, but these incidents are the latest examples that show these advanced cruise-control features Tesla has are not very good at detecting and then stopping for a vehicle that is stopped in a highway circumstance,” said Jason Levine, executive director of the Center for Auto Safety, a group created in the 1970s by Consumers Union and Ralph Nader. This renewed scrutiny arrives at a critical time for Tesla. After reaching a record high this year, its share price has fallen about 20 percent amid signs that the company’s electric cars are losing market share to traditional automakers. Ford Motor’s Mustang Mach E and the Volkswagen ID.4 recently arrived in showrooms and are considered serious challengers to the Model Y. The outcome of the current investigations is important not only for Tesla but for other technology and auto companies that are working on autonomous cars. While Mr. Musk has frequently suggested the widespread use of these vehicles is near, Ford, General Motors and Waymo, a division of Google’s parent, Alphabet, have said that moment could be years or even decades away. Bryant Walker Smith, a professor at the University of South Carolina who has advised the federal government on automated driving, said it was important to develop advanced technologies to reduce traffic fatalities, which now number about 40,000 a year. But he said he had concerns about Autopilot, and how the name and Tesla’s marketing imply drivers can safely turn their attention away from the road. “There is an incredible disconnect between what the company and its founder are saying and letting people believe, and what their system is actually capable of,” he said. Tesla, which disbanded its public relations department and generally does not respond to inquiries from reporters, did not return phone calls or emails seeking comment. And Mr. Musk did not respond to questions sent to him on Twitter. The company has not publicly addressed the recent crashes. While it can determine if Autopilot was on at the time of accidents because its cars constantly send data to the company, it has not said if the system was in use. The company has argued that its cars are very safe, claiming that its own data shows that Teslas are in fewer accidents per mile driven and even fewer when Autopilot is in use. It has also said it tells drivers that they must pay close attention to the road when using Autopilot and should always be ready to retake control of their cars. A federal investigation of the 2016 fatal crash in Florida found that Autopilot had failed to recognize a white semi trailer against a bright sky, and that the driver was able to use it when he wasn’t on a highway. Autopilot continued operating the car at 74 miles per hour even as the driver, Joshua Brown, ignored several warnings to keep his hands on the steering wheel. A second fatal incident took place in Florida in 2019 under similar circumstances — a Tesla crashed into a tractor-trailer when Autopilot was engaged. Investigators determined that the driver had not had his hands on the steering wheel before impact. While NHTSA has not forced Tesla to recall Autopilot, the National Transportation Safety Board concluded that the system “played a major role” in the 2016 Florida accident. It also said the technology lacked safeguards to prevent drivers from taking their hands off the steering wheel or looking away from the road. The safety board reached similar conclusions when it investigated a 2018 accident in California. By comparison, a similar G.M. system, Super Cruise, monitors a driver’s eyes and switches off if the person looks away from the road for more than a few seconds. That system can be used only on major highways. In a Feb. 1 letter, the chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board, Robert Sumwalt, criticized NHTSA for not doing more to evaluate Autopilot and require Tesla to add safeguards that prevent drivers from misusing the system. The new administration in Washington could take a firmer line on safety. The Trump administration did not seek to impose many regulations on autonomous vehicles and sought to ease other rules the auto industry did not like, including fuel-economy standards. By contrast, President Biden has appointed an acting NHTSA administrator, Steven Cliff, who worked at the California Air Resources Board, which frequently clashed with the Trump administration on regulations. Concerns about Autopilot could dissuade some car buyers from paying Tesla for a more advanced version, Full Self-Driving, which the company sells for $10,000. Many customers have paid for it in the expectation of being able to use it in the future; Tesla made the option operational on about 2,000 cars in a “beta” or test version starting late last year, and Mr. Musk recently said the company would soon make it available to more cars. Full Self Driving is supposed to be able to operate Tesla cars in cities and on local roads where driving conditions are made more complex by oncoming traffic, intersections, traffic lights, pedestrians and cyclists. Despite their names, Autopilot and Full Self-Driving have big limitations. Their software and sensors cannot control cars in many situations, which is why drivers have to keep their eyes on the road and hands on or close to the wheel. In a November letter to California’s Department of Motor Vehicles that recently became public, a Tesla lawyer acknowledged that Full Self-Driving struggled to react to a wide range of driving situations and should not be considered a fully autonomous driving system. The system is not “not capable of recognizing or responding” to certain “circumstances and events,” Eric C. Williams, Tesla’s associate general counsel, wrote. “These include static objects and road debris, emergency vehicles, construction zones, large uncontrolled intersections with multiple incoming ways, occlusions, adverse weather, complicated or adversarial vehicles in the driving paths, unmapped roads.” Mr. Levine of the Center for Auto Safety has complained to federal regulators that the names Autopilot and Full Self-Driving are misleading at best and could be encouraging some drivers to be reckless. “Autopilot suggests the car can drive itself and, more importantly, stop itself,” he said. “And they doubled down with Full Self-Driving, and again that leads consumers to believe the vehicle is capable of doing things it is not capable of doing.” Source link Orbem News #Autopilot #Faces #fresh #Scrutiny #Technology #Teslas

0 notes

cavixorg · 2 years ago

Text

0 notes

stocklivemarket · 2 years ago

Text

0 notes