#TariffWars

[ivygorgon]

☕Thats the tea

Context: last | next

[jan-media-tv]

US-China Trade War Heats Up 🔥 | America Slaps 245% Tariff on Chinese Goo...

[insightdaily]

Trump says: 'The ball is in China's court'

U.S. President Donald Trump remains resolute in the ongoing tariff standoff with China, asserting that "the ball is in China's court" and emphasizing that it is up to China to reach an agreement with the United States, according to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday.

“China needs to make a deal with us. We don’t have to make a deal with them,” Leavitt stated.

“There’s no difference between China and any other country, except they are much larger. And China wants what we have—what every country wants—the American consumer. Or put simply, they need our money.”

[newsliveindia]

U.S.-China Trade Tensions Escalate: Markets React Sharply

The U.S. government is now weighing the delisting of Chinese companies from American stock exchanges — a move that could significantly reshape global financial dynamics.

This comes alongside: 🔺 A 145% tariff hike on most Chinese imports 🔁 China’s retaliation with 84% tariffs on U.S. goods ⏸️ A 90-day tariff pause for other trade partners (excluding China)

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said, "Everything’s on the table," hinting at the seriousness of the situation.

With over 286 Chinese companies listed in the U.S. (including Alibaba, NIO, and XPeng), a potential delisting would:

Shake up investor confidence

Strain U.S.-China financial relations

Trigger volatility across global markets

 Thursday’s market snapshot:

S&P 500: -3.5%

Nasdaq: -4.3%

Dow Jones: -2.5%

Oil prices: -3%

👉 As an investor or market watcher, how are you preparing for the ripple effects of this intensifying economic standoff?

[voiceofnickg]

Navigating Global Challenges with Resilience and Vision

The world is once again at a turning point.Tariff changes are shaking industries, businesses are being tested, and global supply chains are under pressure. At EGAN, we see and understand the weight of these disruptions — and we stand in solidarity with all those affected, particularly our partners, suppliers, and industry peers in China and beyond. But where others see obstacles, we see…

[tradeimexdataprovider]

🚨 US Reciprocal Tariffs: What’s Next for Global Trade? 🚨

Former President Donald Trump is pushing for reciprocal tariffs, meaning the U.S. would impose tariffs equal to what other countries charge on American goods. But what does this mean for global trade? 🌍📉

📊 Key Takeaways: ✅ Increased U.S. tariffs on China, Vietnam, India & more ✅ Higher costs for industries like electronics, automobiles, textiles, & pharmaceuticals ✅ Possible trade tensions, supply chain disruptions, and economic shifts

This move could reshape international trade relations—will it be a win for the U.S. or a risk for the global economy? 🤔

📖 Read our full analysis here: https://www.tradeimex.in/blogs/trump-reciprocal-tariffs-us-global-import-export-trends

💬 What are your thoughts on these tariffs? Will they protect American businesses or hurt global commerce? Let’s discuss below! 👇

[iwan1979]

#trumptariffs #tariffwar 2025 Trump's Tariffs War

[moneytower]

What Are Trump’s True Objectives Behind the Tariff Policy?

President Donald Trump implemented significant tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China, prompting these nations to retaliate with their own tariffs. This escalation resulted in a tariff conflict that raised import costs, drove up consumer prices, and placed additional strain on businesses. Some analysts even propose that Trump may have deliberately instigated an economic slowdown. But what was his underlying aim?

What Was Trump’s True Aim?

Trump’s objectives might have extended beyond merely engaging in a tariff conflict. His approach likely sought to lower interest rates, devalue the dollar, and rejuvenate American manufacturing.

At present, the yield on U.S. 10-year Treasury bonds exceeds 4%, while the national debt continues to rise. A reduction in interest rates would alleviate the government's debt interest burden, and a weaker dollar would enhance the competitiveness of U.S. exports.

To facilitate this, Trump exerted pressure on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates by intentionally slowing economic growth. Concurrently, a devalued dollar would benefit U.S. exports and stimulate American manufacturing. Most crucially, he aimed to align the economic recovery with the latter part of his presidency to claim credit for it.

Historical Precedents

Previous U.S. presidents have employed similar tactics to bolster American industries.

- Ronald Reagan (1980s): Reagan safeguarded U.S. manufacturing by limiting Japanese car imports. Initially, he supported a strong dollar but later consented to its devaluation through the Plaza Accord, which aided American exports and compelled Japanese car manufacturers to relocate production to the U.S.

- Richard Nixon (1970s): Nixon introduced the Nixon Shock in 1971, which ended the gold standard and devalued the U.S. dollar. This move made American exports more competitive, reduced trade deficits, and stimulated domestic manufacturing.

Companies That Gained from Similar Approaches

When past presidents implemented comparable policies, certain companies capitalized on these changes and experienced growth.

1. General Motors (GM) and Ford: Reagan's trade policies on Japanese automobiles helped American manufacturers keep their market presence and even grow.

Caterpillar: Following the Plaza Accord, which devalued the dollar, American machinery companies like Caterpillar found themselves with a stronger position in international markets.

Boeing: Nixon's dollar depreciation policies allowed American aircraft manufacturers, particularly Boeing, to thrive as their planes became more affordable for international customers.

If Trump's policies mirror these historical approaches, U.S. manufacturing and export businesses today might also discover avenues for expansion.

How Should We Respond?

If Trump's approach resembles previous strategies, a potential economic slowdown could present investment prospects in U.S. manufacturing firms focused on exports. It's essential to dig deeper than just the visible policies and grasp the underlying motives behind them.

Economic patterns are not coincidental; they are shaped by policy choices. Recognizing the deeper implications of these policies is crucial for making informed investment decisions. Let’s keep analyzing economic trends together and seek out new opportunities.

[ivygorgon]

⛑️ Have you seen the news?

Context: last | next

[jan-media-tv]

🇨🇦 डोनाल्ड ट्रंप के टैरिफ फैसले से टूटा जस्टिन ट्रूडो का दिल | आखिरी भाष...

[usa-journal]

Canada Prepares for Tariff Standoff with the US: “Nothing is Off the Table”

As the United States considers imposing 25% tariffs on Canadian goods, Canadian leaders have pledged a unified response, with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau affirming, “Nothing is off the table.”

The potential tariffs, expected to be implemented under the administration of President-elect Donald Trump, aim to pressure Canada to address concerns about illegal immigration and drug smuggling into the US. With 75% of Canadian exports relying on the US market, the proposed measures could have devastating economic effects.

In a high-level meeting with provincial and territorial premiers, Trudeau emphasized Canada’s commitment to standing up for its economy and citizens. "We will protect Canadians and ensure the burden is shared across the country," he said. Support for sectors affected by the tariffs was also promised.

Energy Exports at the Forefront Energy policy has become a focal point in Canada’s response strategy. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, whose province plays a critical role in energy exports to the US, refused to sign a joint statement supporting possible retaliatory energy tariffs. She vowed to protect Albertans’ livelihoods from what she called “destructive federal policies.”

Meanwhile, other leaders, including the premiers of Ontario, Quebec, and Newfoundland, have signaled openness to using energy exports as leverage. Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Andrew Furey likened energy to Canada’s “queen” in a game of chess, suggesting it could be a decisive bargaining chip.

Canada supplies a significant portion of the US’s crude oil, natural gas, and electricity, with 40% of crude in US refineries originating from Canada. Energy-related countermeasures could therefore have a profound impact on both nations.

Economic Impact and Strategic Challenges Economic analyses predict Canada’s GDP could shrink by up to 5.6% if blanket tariffs are imposed, while the US could see a GDP reduction of up to 1.6%. The Canadian auto industry, heavily concentrated in Ontario, could lose up to 500,000 jobs, with Alberta potentially losing 50,000 jobs in its energy sector.

Experts caution that responding strategically to an unpredictable US administration will be a challenge. "We need to be smarter in how we respond, and that’s tricky," said Drew Fagan, a professor at the University of Toronto.

Domestic and Political Tensions The looming trade conflict comes as Canada grapples with domestic political challenges. Trudeau has announced he will step down in March, with his Liberal Party set to choose a new leader ahead of an anticipated spring election.

Despite fractures in the Canadian leadership’s approach, Trudeau reaffirmed a commitment to a robust response, saying, “We’re all united in recognizing the need to act decisively.”

With the deadline for US tariffs approaching, Canada’s next steps could shape the future of its economic and political relationship with its largest trading partner.

[thevirtualupdate]

With plans to launch 5G by March, Vodafone is set to shake up the telecom market. 📲⚡ Will this intensify the competition or benefit users with better plans? Stay updated!

🔗 Read more: https://thevirtualupdate.com/vodafone-ready-to-start-tariff-war-with-jio-airtel-may-launch-5g-by-march-report-technology-news/

[enterprisewired]

Trump’s Proposed Tariffs Threaten Canada’s Auto Industry

Source: thehindu.com

Share Post:

LinkedIn

Twitter

Facebook

Reddit

Pinterest

Potential Economic Impact on Ontario’s Automotive Sector

Trump’s tariff proposal to impose a 25% duty on Canadian imports has raised significant concerns about the potential impact on Canada’s automotive industry, particularly in Ontario. The province, home to major automakers such as Ford, General Motors, Stellantis, Toyota, and Honda, produced approximately 1.54 million light-duty vehicles in 2023, primarily for the U.S. market. Ontario Premier Doug Ford has expressed alarm, stating that such tariffs could devastate jobs on both sides of the border. The integrated nature of the automotive supply chain means that raw materials and parts often cross the U.S.-Canada border multiple times before final assembly. Tariffs could increase production costs, leading to higher consumer prices, reduced production, and potential job losses.

Broader Economic Implications and Political Reactions

The proposed tariffs are part of a broader plan by President-elect Trump to address issues such as illegal immigration and drug trafficking by leveraging trade policies. He has indicated intentions to impose a 25% levy on imports from Canada and Mexico, and a 10% tariff on Chinese goods, citing national security concerns. These measures could have far-reaching implications beyond the automotive sector, affecting various industries and potentially leading to increased consumer prices. Canadian officials, including Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, have criticized the tariff threats, emphasizing the deep economic ties between Canada and the U.S. Trudeau has highlighted that such measures could make life more expensive for Americans and has indicated a willingness to engage in discussions to address the concerns.

Potential Consequences for North American Trade Relations

Trump’s tariff proposal could disrupt the highly integrated automotive industry in North America, which relies on a complex supply chain spanning the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. The United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA) was designed to facilitate trade among these nations, including provisions that require a significant portion of automobile content to be sourced within the region.

The introduction of new tariffs could disrupt these established trade relationships, leading to economic uncertainty and potential retaliatory measures. Industry experts warn that such disruptions could have a cascading effect, impacting not only manufacturers but also consumers and workers across the continent. The situation remains fluid, with stakeholders on all sides closely monitoring developments and preparing for potential negotiations to mitigate the impact of the proposed tariffs.