#Susan Buckner

[esqueletosgays]

DEADLY BLESSING (1981)

Director: Wes Craven Cinematography: Robert Jessup

[loveboatinsanity]

R.I.P. Susan Buckner

[badmovieihave]

Bad movie I have Grease 1978

[editfandom]

Patty Simcox - Grease, 1978

[lobbycards]

Deadly Blessing, Spanish lobby card. 1981

[the-spooky-mind-of-spiderwish]

[pretty-little-fools]

[plus-low-overthrow]

Lonnie Jordan - He Used To Be A Friend of Mine (MCA)

Flutes, 1978.

Member of the Band, WAR

[camyfilms]

GREASE 1978

Men are rats- listen to me, they're fleas on rats; worse than that, they're amoebas on fleas on rats. I mean, they're too low for even the dogs to bite. 

[greensparty]

Remembering Susan Buckner 1953-2024

Actress Susan Buckner has died at 72. She was Patty in the nostalgic musical classic Grease. She was also on The Brady Bunch Variety Hour (ABC-TV 1976-77).

The link above is the obit from Hollywood Reporter.

[maritamorgado]

Jeffrey Dean Morgan and Jack Quaid at the "Let's Hear It for Prime Video's The Boys" Panel 2024 San Diego International Comic-Con on July 26, 2024 in San Diego, California (Photo by Michael Buckner/Variety via Getty Images)

Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Jensen Ackles and Eric Kripke at the "Let's Hear It for Prime Video's The Boys" Panel at the 2024 San Diego International Comic-Con on July 26, 2024 in San Diego, California (Photo by Michael Buckner/Variety via Getty Images)

Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Antony Starr, Eric Kripke, Jessie T. Usher, Jack Quaid, Claudia Doumit, Erin Moriarty, Susan Heyward, Karen Fukuhara, Colby Minifie, Tomer Capone, Nathan Mitchell, Laz Alonso and Chace Crawford at the "Let's Hear It for Prime Video's The Boys" Panel at the 2024 San Diego International Comic-Con on July 26, 2024 in San Diego, California (Photo by Michael Buckner/Variety via Getty Images)

[70s80sandbeyond]

Susan Buckner and Olivia Newton-John in "Grease" (1978)

[radioeuroextasis]

Time Is Now - Susan James

La cantante, compositora y productora de Los Ángeles, SUSAN JAMES, regresa con su primer álbum en 5 años, y la obra psicodélica de pop de cámara Time Is Now es algo digno de contemplar. Recién salido de una serie de fechas en Norteamérica con Laetitia Sadier (Stereolab), el séptimo álbum de Susan, Time Is Now, acaba de ser lanzado. Con seis álbumes ya bajo su escena de música indie. Su discografía cuenta una historia de crecimiento, experimentación y un compromiso con la autenticidad musical que ha cosechado tanto elogios de la crítica como una base de fans devotos. El nuevo álbum fue diseñado, arreglado y producido por Susan. "Todo se me ocurrió hace un año, como un concepto... y posteriormente escribí esto como lo que considero una banda sonora para escuchar mientras curo un mundo roto. Tenemos que afrontar el hecho de que, en estos tiempos feos y polémicos, el amor, la empatía y la inclusión son partes nefastas y esenciales de nuestra resiliencia humana y son parte integral del avance como especie. Hay algunos que quieren que luchemos y sobrevivamos en lugar de pensar, amar y disfrutar de la vida. Pero al elegir el amor y todo lo que lo conlleva, podemos crear inmensas posibilidades para un hermoso futuro global. " El viaje musical de Susan ha estado marcado por notables colaboraciones y actuaciones junto a íconos de la industria. Desde teloneros con Stereolab, Son Volt, Rufus Wainwright, Billy Bragg, Richard Thompson, el difunto David Lindley, Daniel Lanois, hasta giras en apoyo de Lindsey Buckingham, Bob Weir y Richard Buckner, por nombrar algunos, las experiencias de Susan han dado forma a su arte y han forjado conexiones duraderas en la industria. En 2015, el sexto álbum de Susan, "Sea Glass", se convirtió en un momento destacado en su carrera, recibiendo elogios de la crítica y la adoración del público. El álbum, relanzado más tarde en 2019 en vinilo a través de Sunstone Records UK, mostró los paisajes sonoros únicos de Susan, enriquecidos por su colaboración con Sean O'Hagan de The High Llamas. El nuevo LP Time Is Now marca un regreso triunfal a la forma, y ya ha cosechado críticas muy favorables, ganando un perfecto 5/5 estrellas de Shindig! Revista. Time Is Now ya se describe como una "obra maestra del indie pop retro-futurista", que evoca el alma de los compositores de Laurel Canyon al tiempo que presenta una perspectiva fresca y modernista. Con este álbum, Susan James demuestra una vez más su capacidad para mezclar melodías atemporales con paisajes sonoros innovadores, creando música que resuena con los oyentes antiguos y nuevos. https://www.youtube.com/@MtFoggy Read the full article

[iconichipsterdotcom]

'Grease' Star Susan Buckner Has Died At 72

[sphorus]

I have to preface this as yes, this kind of post is always 100% designed to farm engagement. But I'm gonna take this reblogs advice and make it a learning opportunity for those unfamiliar with why this kind of expression is fundamentally ambiguous. Additionally, this is not about how ÷ is visually similar to +.

The original poster to this meme is correct.

There are two major flaws in this argument and the way I've been seeing a lot of people justify 9 being the 'correct' answer. The second of which is the more important one:

1. While PEMDAS is used in the USA, other completely valid acronyms to the order of operations are used elsewhere. For example, BEDMAS is used in Canada, BODMAS or BIDMAS is used in the UK, as far as I know. (Where B -> Brackets, O -> Order, and I -> Indices). (I am sure there are other acronyms and methods used in countries that aren't English-speaking, but I'm not very educated on what they are, nor is it particularly important to my argument.)

2. Math isn't formally done left -> right. It just isn't. The left -> right method, is exclusively convention, not a rule.

Let's break it down, from the start:

At it's core, the order of operations consists of 4 steps:

1. Parenthesis (()): any operations contained within brackets. For example, in the expression 2 x (1 + 4), (1 + 4) is grouped within a bracket, so you would do that part first. Therefore, it simplifies to 2 x 5 = 10.

2. Exponents (^, E): exponentials (powers) are done next, and take priority over additive and multiplicative groups. For example, 2 x 3 ^ 2 is equal to 2 x (3 ^ 2). Thus, the correct answer is 2 x 9 = 18, as opposed to 6 ^ 2.

3. Multiplication (x, *) and Division (÷, /): this is done after exponents, and can also be referred to as the the "multiplicative group". This is because dividing by a number can also be seen as multiplying by the inverse. For example, 6 ÷ 2 = 3 can be also written as 6 x (1/2) = 3.

4. Addition (+) and Subtraction (-): this is done as the very last step. Similar to multiplication and division, addition and subtraction can also be also referred to as the "additive group". This is because subtracting by something can also be seen as adding by its negative. For example, 3 - 2 = 1 can also be written as 3 + (-2) = 1.

Now, often times in questions like the one OP complains about, the problem lies with an intrinsic ambiguity that multiplication and division have. That is, there is no rules in mathematics that states math must be done from left to right. This left -> right assumption is one many calculators make, so that basic arithmetic doesn't output an error, or multiple outputs.

The ambiguity of the original problem is due to the uncertainty in whether it is asking 6 x (1/2) x (1 + 2) = 9 OR 6 / (2 x (1 + 2)) = 1

Both of these interpretations of the question are mathematically correct, and outside of these kinds of online questions, you will most certainly see the problem stated as either one or the other. It's very important when writing math problems like this to prioritize clarity with the use of brackets!

Here are some more ambiguous problems as food for thought - how would you interpret these? Are your interpretations all left -> right? (Examples from Knill, 2014):

3 / 4 / 5

3 ^ 3 ^ 3

5 / 2π

References (Where I get my talking points, and provide a more in depth explanation to the ambiguity of problems like these):

AMBIGUOUS PEMDAS, Oliver Knill, written as a collection and on the Harvard math website

Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, Jae Ki Lee, Susan Licwinko, and Nicole Taylor-Buckner

"Order of operations" and other oddities in school mathematics, Hung-Hsi Wu

Stolen from twitter.

Remember that the ÷ symbol is never used in equations because it would create ambiguity. You can't give a correct answer to an incorrect equation.

[scrapesaladofficial]

Grease Star Susan Buckner Has Died

Susan Buckner, the actress best known for her role in Grease, has died. Advertisements The 1978 hit musical has sadly lost another of its stars. Grease follows the lives of greaser Danny Zuko (John Travolta) and Australian transfer student Sandy Olsson (Olivia Newton-John), who develop an attraction for one another during a summer romance. Related Article: Grease Is Being Branded ‘Sexist’,…