#Software Testing QA

[praxis-app]

Testing and QA is now open for all verified members of the Praxis Discord server!

If you're interested in helping to test the website and would like to be the first to know about the latest features, join us on Discord and we can get you set up with an account in our new testing environment.

As we're still in the very early stages of testing and QA, please bear in mind that Praxis is not yet intended for serious use outside of testing or research purposes.

Invite link to the Praxis Discord

[genqeai]

Advancing Software Quality with Professional Quality Assurance Testing Services

Today, in this fast-paced world of digital technology, it is more important than ever to have quality assurance testing that makes software both reliable and error-free. Quality assurance software testing ensures functionality, performance, and security, which helps businesses meet users' expectations while maintaining a good reputation. It is a preventive measure that catches and resolves the issues before they affect end users.

QA testing for software takes a more structured approach to find bugs and performance-related issues and other problems. Businesses, teaming up with software testing and quality assurance service providers, can speed up their development cycles, eradicate unwanted expenses, and increase end-user satisfaction. It lets your software run on any device under any environment.

By adopting quality assurance testing, you’re making sure your software meets the highest standards for functionality and reliability. For top-notch software testing and quality assurance services, connect with GenQE. Their expertise and advanced testing solutions will elevate your software’s performance, enhance the user experience, and give your business peace of mind.

[antheraea]

Flash Was Killed Because It Was Objectively Dangerous

I get it, I get the Flash nostalgia and the fondness for old Flash games. I was big on Neopets before they decided to ruin the art and make all the pets samey paper dolls to play dressup with (completely ruining the point of the far more expensive "redraw" colors like Mutant and Faerie and Desert). I have fond memories of Newgrounds games and I even managed to take a class for a semester in high school where I could learn flash.

But I also remember how terrible it was. And you should too.

Leaving aside all of the issues involving performance and inaccessibility (such as being easily broken by bog-standard browser actions like the back button, and its ability to modify web code AND OS code in real time likely broke a lot of accessibility tech too), Flash was legitimately one of the most dangerous web technologies for the end user. An end-user is you, or more specifically back then, child-you.

According to Wikipedia and its sources, Flash Player has over a thousand vulnerabilities known and listed and over 800 of these lead to arbitrary code execution.

What is arbitrary code execution? That's when someone can just run any commands they want on a machine or program that didn't intend it. A fun way to see this is in this infamous Pokemon tool-assisted speedrun where they manage to get an SNES to show the host's twitch chat in real time. It's not so fun though when it's someone stealing all the files on your computer, grabbing your credentials so they could clean out your Neopets account (yes, really, it was a pretty common concern at the time), and other nefarious works. Also, there was a time where it allowed people to spy on you with your webcam and microphone.

Oh and on top of all of this, Flash had its own "flash cookies", which could not be cleared by ordinary means and thus could be used to track users indefinitely, at least until Adobe slapped a bandaid over it by introducing yet another screen an ordinary person wouldn't know to use. (I assume this is how the infamous neopets "cookie grabbers" worked, so they could get into your account. This is mainly what I remember about using Flash back in the early 2000s lol) So it not only was a "stranger taking over your machine" concern, but a bog-standard privacy concern too, arguably a precursor to our current panopticon internet landscape, where greedy websites would track you because they could and maybe get some money out of it, facilitated by this technology.

When Apple decided to block it, it wasn't out of greed; Steve Jobs cited its abysmal performance and security record, among other issues such as an inherent lack of touchscreen support, and Apple cited specific vulnerability use-cases when blocking specific versions before they nuked it entirely. When Mozilla, who makes Firefox, decided to block it, it's not like they would've gotten money out of doing so, or by offering an alternative; they did so because it is fucking dangerous.

Your ire and nostalgia is misplaced. Flash was not killed by our current shitty web practices that ruin unique spaces and fun games. Flash was killed because both Macromedia (its original developers) and Adobe were incapable of making it safe, if that was even possible, and it was killed after third-parties, in an unprecedented gesture, collectively threw their hands up and said enough.

Well, that and HTML5 being developed and becoming more widespread, being able to do everything Flash can do without being a pox on technology. One could argue that you should bemoan the lack of Flash-to-HTML5 conversion efforts, but that requires asking a lot of effort of people who would have to do that shit for free...and if they have to run Flash to do so, opening themselves up to some of the nastiest exploits on the internet.

Nostalgia is a fucking liar. The games themselves I think are worth having nostalgia over (look, I still find myself pining for that one bullet hell Neopets made and Hannah and the Pirate Caves), but Flash itself deserves none of that, and absolutely deserved to be put in the fucking ground. You're blaming the wrong causes. It was terrible.

(specifics and sources found via its wikipedia page, which has a lot more than is mentioned here. and also my own opinions and experiences back then. lol)

[daisukitoo]

Software QA testing is a form of Hermetic ritual magic.

Many people believe that the purpose of QA testing is to find and fix bugs, which it does in part. But in truth, no software has ever been sufficiently "bug free" to work on real hardware. We mostly pretend that putting lightning in crystals can make thinking boxes, and it works.

The value of QA testing is in its repetition. Thorough QA testing exhausts the expanse of possibility space, allowing the crafter to choose the canonical path. By performing 1,000 repetitions on the "happy path," a groove is worn in reality itself and provides a path for the software to follow. It is also helpful in part to have the belief in fixed bugs reinforcing the effectiveness of the software.

Poorly QAed software attempts to hijack this external belief the way that counterfeit goods and placebos do. So long as no one pokes too closely at the details and their beliefs, the software can continue to work. A doubtful click away from the "happy path" can break poorly QAed software where well-tested software can withstand pressure.

[yethiconsulting]

UI Automation Testing: Reducing Manual Efforts and Boosting Accuracy

Introduction:

UI automation testing is a powerful method for reducing manual testing efforts while improving test accuracy and coverage. By automating repetitive tasks, QA teams can focus on more complex testing, leading to faster release cycles and higher software quality.

Automating Repetitive Tasks:

Manual UI testing can be time-consuming and prone to human error. Automating repetitive tasks—like form submissions, button clicks, and navigation—frees up testers to focus on more critical, exploratory testing. Tools like Selenium and Cypress allow you to automate these tasks, ensuring consistency across test runs.

Increasing Accuracy and Consistency:

Automation eliminates the variability introduced by human testers, ensuring the same steps are executed each time, thus improving the reliability of your tests. Automation also enables parallel testing across multiple browsers and devices, enhancing test coverage.

Faster Feedback with CI/CD Integration:

Integrating UI automation testing into CI/CD pipelines ensures that tests run automatically after each code change, providing faster feedback to developers. This helps catch bugs early in the development cycle, reducing the risk of costly errors.

Conclusion:

By automating UI testing, teams can significantly reduce manual efforts, increase accuracy, and accelerate development timelines. This leads to more reliable software and more efficient testing processes.

[gopinadhreddy]

QA & SOFTWARE TESTING - SPARK TECHNOLOGIES

As a world-class IT services provider with years of experience across various sectors globally. Spark Technologies delivers the business IT solutions you need to enhance efficiency, add value, and reduce costs. We design, develop, implement, manage, and optimize access to systems and information, addressing your business processing, application, and infrastructure needs.

click here for more

[qualizeal]

Quality Engineering and Digital Transformation Services - QualiZeal

Our Next Gen Quality Assurance & Engineering Services pave the way for accelerated digital growth. Drive faster time to market and assure success for enterprise software in the connected world.

Visit for more info:

https://qualizeal.com/

[12thwonderindia]

How QA Services Can Reduce Software Development Cost?

While exploring through the constantly evolving software development field, striking the right chord between quality and cost-effectiveness remains an ongoing challenge. Third-party QA services emerge as a strategic solution, not only ensuring high-quality software but also significantly reducing costs throughout the development lifecycle. Explore how our QA services have consistently delivered tangible benefits, optimizing processes and saving both time and money.

Key Points

Early Bug Detection and Resolution: Minimize costs by identifying and resolving bugs during development or testing phases.

Enhanced Productivity: Streamline development processes, identify inefficiencies, and automate repetitive tasks to boost overall team productivity.

Reduced Post-Release Support: Thorough testing before release mitigates defects, reducing the need for extensive post-release support and maintenance.

Improved Resource Allocation: Identify critical issues early, allowing for more efficient resource allocation and preventing firefighting scenarios.

Lower Risks of Security Breaches: Security testing identifies vulnerabilities, preventing potential financial losses and safeguarding your company's reputation.

Enhanced Customer Satisfaction: Deliver quality software that exceeds user expectations, leading to higher customer satisfaction and reduced support costs.

Minimized Rework: Avoid costly and time-consuming rework by ensuring well-defined requirements and building software accordingly from the start.

Investing in QA services is a strategic move that goes beyond bug fixing. By optimizing development processes, improving security, and satisfying customers, companies can make a smart investment that significantly reduces costs in the long run.

Curious to learn more? Visit our website's blog page to read some in-depth details of how QA services can transform your software development journey and lead to substantial savings. Your path to efficient, cost-effective, and high-quality software development starts here! https://12thwonder.com/company/blog/qa-services-cost-reduction-blog/

[fugu-in-f]

please, it's hard enough to make sure the software does what it's designed to; accessibility needs to go into design and planning well before QA gets hands on it

we're frequently an afterthought already

A software tester walks into a bar. Runs into a bar. Crawls into a bar. Dances into a bar. Flies into a bar. Jumps into a bar. And orders: a beer. 2 beers. O beers. 99999999 beers. a lizard in a beer glass. -1 beer. "qwertyuiop" beers. Testing complete. A real customer walks into the bar and turns on a screen reader. The bar goes up in flames.

[assureqa-ai]

Low-Code vs. No-Code Automation Testing: Choosing the Right Tool for Your QA Success

Low-Code vs. No-Code Automation Testing Tools Choosing the right automation testing tool can revolutionize your software quality assurance process. Low-code tools offer flexibility with minimal coding, perfect for complex workflows, while no-code tools empower non-technical users to automate effortlessly. When it comes to the best platform, Assure QA stands out. With expertise in functional, automation, performance, and security testing, Assure QA provides robust, high-performing solutions tailored to your needs. Its intuitive platform allows you to create reusable, scalable tests and offers seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines. Simplify your automation journey with Assure QA\u2014your trusted partner for exceptional software quality assurance.

[rahulacademy]

Don’t miss the opportunity to advance your career in software testing. Enroll in Rahul Shetty Academy’s online Postman API testing course today and take the first step towards becoming an expert in Postman automation API testing!

[hikeqa]

Ensure Quality: Software testing helps identify and fix bugs before the product reaches users, ensuring a smooth and reliable experience.

Cost-Effective: Finding and fixing issues early in development is far cheaper than addressing them after deployment.

User Satisfaction: Testing ensures the software meets user expectations, providing a better and more consistent experience.

Security: Thorough testing helps detect vulnerabilities, reducing the risk of security breaches and protecting sensitive data.

Performance Optimization: Testing identifies performance issues, ensuring the software runs efficiently under various conditions and loads.

[fugu-in-f]

I love breaking things in new and exciting ways

I'm so good at it I get paid real well to do just that

And when that's your job,

You learn REAL QUICK that nobody knows what they're doing

and nothing is adequately documented

And it all runs on spit and dreams and half an ass cheek and some anal gremlin that cares entirely too much about specificity

You be that goblin

invent a bigger idiot-

just write that shit down

impostor syndrome: Oh no what if they can all tell that I'm an idiot who's not even supposed to be here, this is terrible. goblin mode: I am the idiot that they use to test whether something's idiot-proof, and boy is this place not up to code.

[qualityassurance11]

Maximizing Efficiency with a Balanced QA Testing Strategy

In the fast-paced world of software development, achieving high-quality outcomes while maintaining speed and efficiency is a constant challenge. A balanced QA testing strategy is the cornerstone of success, enabling teams to blend different testing approaches that complement each other to maximize both coverage and resource utilization. By integrating automation, manual testing, and exploratory techniques, businesses can reduce defects, improve user satisfaction, and accelerate delivery timelines. 

The Importance of a Balanced Testing Strategy 

No single testing method can address all quality assurance needs. A well-rounded QA testing strategy combines multiple approaches to cover diverse scenarios, from regression testing to uncovering edge cases. This balance prevents the pitfalls of relying too heavily on either manual or automated tests alone. 

Organizations often fall into a trap when they over-automate or underutilize exploratory testing, leading to gaps in coverage or inefficiencies. For instance, automated tests alone may miss usability flaws, while manual testing without automation leads to slower release cycles. Striking the right balance empowers teams to address these challenges comprehensively. 

Key Components of a Balanced QA Testing Strategy 

Automated Testing for Speed and Consistency  Automated testing excels in repetitive, data-driven scenarios, allowing teams to quickly validate features without manual intervention. 

Best Use Cases: Regression testing, performance testing, and continuous integration pipelines. 

Advantages: Automation reduces the time required for repetitive tasks, offers faster execution, and provides immediate feedback. 

GhostQA’s Role: GhostQA reduces maintenance overhead with self-healing scripts that adapt to code changes, enabling round-the-clock testing for faster releases. By leveraging automated test scheduling, GhostQA allows teams to continuously validate code changes without manual oversight. 

Manual Testing for Critical Thinking and Flexibility  Certain scenarios require human intuition, creativity, and context awareness. Manual testing is indispensable for user interface (UI) evaluations and complex logic validation. 

Best Use Cases: Usability testing, accessibility audits, and exploratory testing. 

Advantages: Manual testing is better suited for identifying issues that require subjective assessment, such as user experience and visual discrepancies. 

GhostQA’s Role: GhostQA supports hybrid workflows where manual insights feed into automated tests, maximizing efficiency while retaining flexibility. Testers can document their findings, which can be integrated into automated scripts to refine future test cycles. 

Exploratory Testing for Uncovering Unexpected Issues  Exploratory testing empowers testers to think like end-users, dynamically uncovering defects that structured tests may miss. It is a context-driven technique where testers navigate the software based on their understanding and intuition. 

Best Use Cases: Early feature development, user experience testing, and testing complex or dynamic systems. 

Advantages: Exploratory testing uncovers usability issues, design flaws, and edge cases that are difficult to script. 

GhostQA’s Role: By integrating AI-driven analytics, GhostQA highlights high-risk areas, guiding exploratory testing sessions to focus on potential vulnerabilities. The platform provides actionable insights that streamline documentation and can inform automated test creation. 

Balancing Test Coverage and Resource Allocation 

Achieving balance requires careful planning to ensure that critical paths and user journeys receive priority. A successful QA strategy allocates resources effectively by: 

Automating repetitive, stable tests to save time and minimize manual workload. 

Assigning manual testing to areas where user perception, experience, or creativity is key. 

Leveraging risk-based prioritization for exploratory sessions to focus on high-impact areas. 

Effective resource allocation reduces time-to-market while ensuring comprehensive coverage. In a balanced strategy, automation handles repetitive regression tests, freeing human testers to engage in exploratory and manual efforts where their expertise adds the most value. 

Benefits of a Balanced Strategy with GhostQA 

Enhanced Accuracy and Reduced Costs  Automated testing with GhostQA minimizes human error by executing predefined tests consistently. It also cuts down on the manual effort required for regression and performance testing. 

Adaptable Workflows  GhostQA’s self-healing scripts adapt automatically to code changes, reducing test maintenance. This adaptability ensures that test automation remains robust even in dynamic development environments. 

Scalable Efficiency  GhostQA’s automated test scheduling and round-the-clock capabilities provide continuous testing and immediate feedback, empowering teams to detect and resolve defects rapidly. 

Integrated Insights from Manual and Exploratory Testing  GhostQA facilitates the integration of exploratory testing insights into automated test scripts, improving test coverage. Testers can document findings in real-time, transforming manual discoveries into future automated scenarios. 

Practical Steps to Implement a Balanced QA Strategy 

To achieve a well-balanced strategy, follow these steps: 

Define Quality Goals and Priorities: Identify key user flows, business-critical functionalities, and performance benchmarks. 

Adopt a Risk-Based Approach: Prioritize areas with higher failure risks for more comprehensive manual and exploratory testing. 

Automate Strategically: Focus automation on stable, repetitive tasks while keeping exploratory efforts focused on dynamic, less predictable areas. 

Leverage Modern Tools Like GhostQA: Use AI-driven platforms to streamline automation, risk detection, and test maintenance. 

Encourage Collaboration Between Teams: Developers, QA engineers, and product teams should share insights to improve test design and coverage. 

Striking the Right Balance for Long-Term Success 

A balanced QA strategy is not static. As software evolves, testing needs will shift, requiring continuous refinement. GhostQA’s adaptive capabilities and intelligent automation ensure that QA teams stay agile, scalable, and effective. 

Conclusion 

Maximizing efficiency in QA requires a thoughtful combination of automation, manual, and exploratory testing. GhostQA provides the tools to integrate these approaches seamlessly, enhancing quality, reducing time-to-market, and delivering superior user experiences. A balanced strategy doesn’t just improve testing — it transforms how software quality is managed in dynamic, Agile environments. 

[yethiconsulting]

Best Practices for Test Management in a Continuous Integration/Delivery (CI/CD) Environment

Introduction

Start by explaining the role of Continuous Integration (CI) and Continuous Delivery (CD) in modern software development. Emphasize that effective test management is crucial to maintaining quality in fast-paced, automated pipelines.

Early and Continuous Testing

Implement testing at every stage of the CI/CD pipeline, starting from the earliest phases. Unit, integration, and functional tests should be run continuously to catch defects early.

Automation Integration

Test automation is vital for CI/CD environments. Ensure that all repetitive tests, such as regression tests, are automated. Use tools like Selenium, Jenkins, and Travis CI to integrate automated tests into the pipeline.

Effective Test Case Management

Organize test cases in a way that they can be easily maintained and executed in CI/CD pipelines. Regularly review and update test cases to ensure they are relevant and up-to-date.

Use of Test Management Tools

Leverage test management tools like TestRail or Zephyr that integrate with CI/CD platforms. This ensures seamless tracking, reporting, and scheduling of tests within the automated process.

Monitoring and Reporting

Set up real-time monitoring and reporting for continuous feedback on test results. This helps in quickly identifying issues and improving collaboration between developers and QA teams.

Conclusion

Summarize by stating that efficient test management in a CI/CD environment enhances the speed and reliability of software delivery while maintaining high-quality standards.

[analytss]

Tech Mastery: Analyt Solutions Leading in QA Testing Software Solutions

Ensure software perfection with Analyt Solutions, your QA Testing Software partner. We guarantee top-notch quality assurance for flawless applications. Contact Us: +1 (201)-857-7538.