#Single Track

[fuzzyimages]

Me. A rare photo indeed.

[araiwatal]

普通列車でどこかへ #232

トロッコ列車「奥出雲おろち号」備後落合行 島根県 仁多郡あたり

Go somewhere by local train #232

Trolley train “Oku-Izumo Orochi” bound for Bingo-Ochiai Around Nita District, Shimane Prefecture

Youtube https://www.youtube.com/@relax_chill_Japan

Amazon Japan Kindle https://www.amazon.co.jp/新井ワタ��/e/B0168GDX1M/

Amazon USA Kindle https://www.amazon.com/WATAL-ARAI/e/B01BODI7I8

[on-it]

[kimfuelling]

Ride / 60" x 36" / Oil on Panel

[fede78-tv]

Testa bassa e gas a più non posso!!!

[myhughniverse]

Happy 5th anniversary : "Golden" !

[egophiliac]

Tl;Dr - I stopped playing the game but I like the characters and I wanna draw them but idk if the wiki I use is up to date for cards

Do u know any wikis that have up to date cards for all the twst characters-

Asking specifically bc of Malleus cause I can't tell anymore if he has any more new cards bc HE DOESN'T EVEN HAVE A 100 DISNEY ANIVERSARY CARD IN THE WIKI I USE 😭

Like compared to everyone else in Disanomia, he has 12 cards (in the wiki I use) and then Lilia has 17 cards 💀

Cause I think Malleus has a Bean's Day card as well, but that could just be a fanmade one, I don't have JP twst nor ENG twst anymore so I can't confirm it myself urhghrhevw 🫠

Malleus doesn't have a Beans Day card, so that would've been fanmade! and the 100 anniversary cards are actually the new round of birthday cards, so most of the characters don't have 'em yet -- Malleus should be getting his in a couple of days, when his birthday event starts! oh god my keeeeeys

I think the wiki.gg stays pretty up to date? it looks to me like they have everything that's currently up through JP, at least. :O I did go through and do a quick count just because I couldn't believe Malleus only had 12 cards, but. he really does have the least...defeated only by Silver with 13...astonishing. we need his gargoyle club wear immediately.

[pkmn-redirect]

Chapter 3 - Page 24

First | Previous

Index

[raptorrobot]

low tier shitpost for today

[fuzzyimages]

Proper.

[araiwatal]

普通列車でどこかへ #229

トロッコ列車「奥出雲おろち号」備後落合行 島根県 仁多郡

出雲坂根駅のスイッチバック

Amazon Japan Kindle 新井ワタルのページ https://www.amazon.co.jp/新井ワタル/e/B0168GDX1M/

Go somewhere by local train #229

Trolley train “Oku-Izumo Orochi” bound for Bingo-Ochiai Nita District, Shimane Prefecture

Switchback at Izumo Sakane Station

Amazon USA Kindle Watal Arai's Page https://www.amazon.com/WATAL-ARAI/e/B01BODI7I8

[soyouwinagain]

bryce harper & alec bohm | 24 august 2024

[fede78-tv]

Guarda "toccata e fuga mattutina nel boschetto della felicità con il ktm 690" su YouTube

[sprolden]

music is entirely subjective and it's literally impossible for anyone to have 'incorrect' opinions on what is and what isnt a good song. except for people who disagree with me personally, who are in a unique position to be Wrong. btw

[direquail]

You know the point of "protecting the children" dogwhistles, right? It's a reference to the idea that all queer people are child abusers. Super common belief among homophobes and transphobes, including (sometimes especially) gay ones.

It's also not just "a dogwhistle". When pressed to explain what exactly they want to protect children from, it's a ready-made emotional appeal to something that has broad social support. Most people, even if they don't like being around kids, are also not pro-child abuse. That's why conservatives go out of their way to invent (even if it's completely fictional) "reasons" why acceptance of gay and trans people amounts to child abuse. It helps them create an emotional connection with their target audience, and can be leveraged into logically ridiculous arguments like "well, if you don't agree with my platform, you must be pro child abuse, because I'm on the side of The Children".

"Protecting the children" is also super appealing to parents in particular, not because all parents are secretly authoritarians, but because it's super common to have a child and realize "Oh shit, I brought this person who can't defend themselves into the world and the world kind of sucks", and to feel horribly, horribly inadequate in the face of that.

I get very tired of people who mock, scorn, and ridicule people for falling for these rhetorical traps, or being snared by something that seems common-sense but disguises something ugly underneath. They are traps. That is what they're meant to be. That is why there are gay people who fall for anti-queer rhetoric, and get pulled into exclusionist or violently reactionary circles. We all have things we are vulnerable to, whether that is a history of being abused or a deep fear that we cannot protect our own children, who we brought into the world and are responsible for the protection of. And we gain nothing by mocking the latter.

I'm sure it makes some people feel great to say "well if you were really who you claim to be, you wouldn't fall for this shit", but frankly, that's a stupid-ass take. It misses entirely that these messages are carefully crafted by the people who hate us! They workshop these statements! They spend months or years trying to find the right message and when they find it they use the hell out of it, because it works. Because they are listening to the public conversations people are having online, and it doesn't take any level of basic agreement to be capable of regurgitating the party line word-for-word.

I am so sick of people who look at a deeply-embedded struggle over social and political ideals and think that this fight won't demand our whole brains and hearts and souls and yeah, we might fuck up because we care deeply and sometimes, people with bad intentions prey on that. On our grief and our fear and our rage.

And I'm frankly a lot more nervous around people who refuse to be aware of that, especially when they loudly mock the people who are willing to acknowledge their own fallibility and explore how they got ensnared in something. People are not moral machines, they are people.