#Separation of church and state
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
jdsquared · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Anybody with a pulse is better than what they’ll do to this country.
1K notes · View notes
liberalsarecool · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Conservative churches exploit their tax-free status.
840 notes · View notes
odinsblog · 5 months ago
Text
🗣️This is an illegitimate and deeply corrupt Supreme Court
Tumblr media
Justice Samuel Alito spoke candidly about the ideological battle between the left and the right — discussing the difficulty of living “peacefully” with ideological opponents in the face of “fundamental” differences that “can’t be compromised.” He endorsed what his interlocutor described as a necessary fight to “return our country to a place of godliness.” And Alito offered a blunt assessment of how America’s polarization will ultimately be resolved: “One side or the other is going to win.”
Alito made these remarks in conversation at the Supreme Court Historical Society’s annual dinner on June 3, a function that is known to right-wing activists as an opportunity to buttonhole Supreme Court justices. His comments were recorded by Lauren Windsor, a liberal documentary filmmaker. Windsor attended the dinner as a dues-paying member of the society under her real name, along with a colleague. She asked questions of the justice as though she were a religious conservative.
The justice’s unguarded comments highlight the degree to which Alito makes little effort to present himself as a neutral umpire calling judicial balls and strikes, but rather as a partisan member of a hard-right judicial faction that’s empowered to make life-altering decisions for every American.
(continue reading)
136 notes · View notes
canadianabroadvery · 10 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
257 notes · View notes
porterdavis · 3 months ago
Text
Is this what you want?
Tumblr media
Whatever happened to separation of church and state?
46 notes · View notes
sixbucks · 1 month ago
Text
The border I want to close is the one between church and state.
29 notes · View notes
spaceshipsandpurpledrank · 1 month ago
Text
19 notes · View notes
contemplatingoutlander · 1 year ago
Text
A Trump judge sends Southwest Airlines to right-wing reeducation camp
Tumblr media
Ruth Marcus does an excellent job of pointing out how another Trump appointed judge (from Texas) is stomping on the Constitution when it comes to the separation of church and state. The judge in this case doesn't seem to understand the difference between people being allowed to hold religious beliefs and religious people harassing others who don't share their religious beliefs. The article is well worth reading. Here are some excerpts:
Another day, another extremist ruling by another extremist Trump judge, and this decision — from Texas, no surprise — is straight out of “The Handmaid’s Tale.” The judge held lawyers for Southwest Airlines in contempt of court for their actions in a religious-discrimination case brought by a former flight attendant and ordered them to undergo “religious liberty training.” And not just any instruction, but training conducted by the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a conservative group that litigates against same-sex marriage, transgender rights and abortion rights. [emphasis added] The issue arises from a lawsuit filed by Charlene Carter, a flight attendant for more than 20 years and a longtime antagonist of the Southwest flight attendants union. In 2017, after union members attended the Women’s March under a “Southwest Airlines Flight Attendants” banner, Carter sent Facebook messages to the union president containing graphic antiabortion messages.
[See more under the cut.]
“This is what you supported during your Paid Leave with others at the Women’s MARCH in DC …. You truly are Despicable in so many ways,” Carter wrote in one message accompanying a video of an aborted fetus. After the union president complained, Southwest fired Carter, saying her conduct “crossed the boundaries of acceptable behavior,” was ��inappropriate, harassing, and offensive,” and “did not adhere to Southwest policies and guidelines.” An arbitrator found that Southwest had just cause for the firing. Carter, represented by the National Right to Work Committee, sued, claiming Southwest and the union violated her rights under federal labor laws and Title VII. The federal job-bias law bars employers from discriminating on the basis of religion, and Carter claimed she was dismissed because of her sincerely held religious beliefs against abortion. [...] The scary part is what came next. [U.S. District Judge Brantley] Starr instructed the airline to “inform Southwest Flight Attendants that, under Title VII, [Southwest] may not discriminate against Southwest flight attendants for their religious practices and beliefs.” Instead, Southwest said in a message to staff that the court “ordered us to inform you that Southwest does not discriminate against our Employees for their religious practices and beliefs.” This sent Starr into orbit.... “In the universe we live in — the one where words mean something — Southwest’s notice didn’t come close to complying with the Court’s order,” Starr said. “To make matters worse,” he said, Southwest had circulated a memo about the decision to its employees repeating its view that Carter’s conduct was unacceptable and emphasizing the need for civility. “Southwest’s speech and actions toward employees demonstrate a chronic failure to understand the role of federal protections for religious freedom,” Starr decreed. He proceeded to order three Southwest lawyers to undergo eight hours of religious-liberty training — a move he described as “the least restrictive means of achieving compliance with the Court’s order.” Luckily, Starr observed, “there are esteemed nonprofit organizations that are dedicated to preserving free speech and religious freedom.” [...] Adjectives fail me here. This is not even close to normal.... the notion of subjecting lawyers to a reeducation campaign by the likes of the ADF is tantamount to creating a government-endorsed thought police. Imagine the uproar — and I’m not suggesting these groups are in any way comparable — if a liberal-leaning federal judge ordered instruction on women’s rights (those are constitutionally protected, too) by Planned Parenthood. [...] This is the alarming legacy that former president Donald Trump has left us — a skewed bench that he would augment if reelected. The Trump judges seem to be competing among themselves for who can engage in the greatest overreach. [...] Conservatives are quick to balk at anything resembling the order that Starr issued when they disagree with the underlying principle. [...] I need no excuses for calling this what it is: a reeducation program — outrageous, unconstitutional and an abuse of judicial authority. [emphasis added]
251 notes · View notes
randyite · 1 year ago
Text
The Never-ending "War on Christmas"
Tumblr media
141 notes · View notes
sordidamok · 7 months ago
Text
MTG claims that God is telling Americans to do what MTG wants Americans to do. No surprise there.
47 notes · View notes
bigdadskypilot · 2 years ago
Text
Tumblr media
“Don't join the book burners. Don't think you're going to conceal faults by concealing evidence that they ever existed. Don't be afraid to go in your library and read every book...”
― Dwight D. Eisenhower
Republicans today are the antithesis of what they once were. They bear no resemblance to Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, or Dwight Eisenhower. They are not erudite like William F. Buckley. They are identified by the horrible things they stand for: hate, fear, and violence. They wrap themselves in flags and clutch bibles, while displaying the honor and loyalty of neither. Any dedication to the principles upon which this nation was founded demands full and complete opposition to them. If that’s what makes me a “liberal.” Then so be it.
287 notes · View notes
spiderlegsmusic · 4 months ago
Text
Consider this a direct response to these Heritage Foundation “theocratic” christofascists. A letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association in 1802 in response to their letter to him in 1801. It is as follows, Heretowith:
Gentlemen
The affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. my duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, & in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing.
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.
Congress thus inhibited from acts respecting religion, and the Executive authorised only to execute their acts, I have refrained from prescribing even those occasional performances of devotion, practiced indeed by the Executive of another nation as the legal head of its church, but subject here, as religious exercises only to the voluntary regulations and discipline of each respective sect.
Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.
I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association assurances of my high respect & esteem.
(signed) Thomas Jefferson
Jan.1.1802.
Thus Jefferson is saying go to Church, worship god in anyway you see fit secure in the knowledge that the govt won’t interfere at all, and conversely, that same govt will not respect your religion more than any other—or no religion—other than respecting its right to exist.
23 notes · View notes
dontmean2bepoliticalbut · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
24 notes · View notes
canadianabroadvery · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
270 notes · View notes
porterdavis · 3 months ago
Text
Fair is fair
In a letter to the editor of The Washington Post, Larry McClemons of Annandale, Va., took issue with Oklahoma’s new edict that the Bible be taught in every classroom: “Perhaps, in a show of fairness, these state officials could mandate the teaching of algebra in churches.” (Arthur Rothstein, San Francisco)
47 notes · View notes
kandoros · 1 month ago
Text
Jesus wept
The Oklahoma state superintendent of education put out a bid to purchase bibles to place in every school in the state. The requirements:
Must be King James Version
Must contain Old and New Testaments
Must include the Pledge of Allegiance, Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights (for some reason I guess the head of OK schools thinks the Bill of Rights and the Constitution are separate things?)
Must be bound in leather or leather-like material.
A salesperson for a Christian bookstore searched through their database, and out of almost three thousand Bibles, only two fit all those criteria:
One endorsed by Donald Trump, which he gets a cut of the sales, and one endorsed by Donald Trump Jr.
So in short, a Republican education leader just used religion to shovel about three million dollars into Donald Trump's pocket.
It's been a while since I was in church, but I distinctly remember a story about people profiting off religion:
Tumblr media
11 notes · View notes