#SUPREME-COURT

[megayogiposts]

Hearing Notice for CIC Second Appeal - Punjab National Bank

Hearing NoticeCentral Information CommissionBaba Gang Nath MargMunirka, New Delhi – 110067011-26180514http://dsscic.nic.in/online-link-paper-compliance/addFile No. CIC/PNBNK/A/2023/651218DATE : 22-11-2024NOTICE OF HEARING FOR SECOND APPEAL/COMPLAINTAppellant(s)/Complainant(s):Respondent(s):Yogi M P SinghCPIO :1. The CPIO,Punjab National Bank, PNBHouse, Circle Office,Yamunapuram, Near RTO…

[preetisinghuniverse]

Uttar Pradesh RTI Website Issues: Grievance Submission Details

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2024/0093266Grievance Concerns ToName Of ComplainantYogi M. P. SinghDate of Receipt19/12/2024Received By Ministry/DepartmentUttar PradeshGrievance DescriptionThe applicant made repeated requests on the RTI portal to submit the following RTI application but it is most unfortunate that the following error message is showing on the screen of the…

[vague-humanoid]

You can write that the Supreme Court is delegitimizing itself only so many times before you’ve made yourself ridiculous. If the high court is not in fact behaving in a fashion that makes its decisions respected, the real question is: Why are we all zealously watching and reporting on its decisions as though they are immutable legal truths? Why are we scientifically analyzing every case that comes down as if it holds value? The obvious answer is that these decisions have real consequences—something the past year has showed us far too graphically. But if the Supreme Court is no longer functioning as a real “court,” why are we mostly still treating its output as if it were simply the “law”?

This is a part of Disorder in the Court, a weeklong series on the legal press and the most explosive Supreme Court in generations: how we cover it, how we’ve failed, and how we can do better.

You can write that the Supreme Court is delegitimizing itself only so many times before you’ve made yourself ridiculous. If the high court is not in fact behaving in a fashion that makes its decisions respected, the real question is: Why are we all zealously watching and reporting on its decisions as though they are immutable legal truths? Why are we scientifically analyzing every case that comes down as if it holds value? The obvious answer is that these decisions have real consequences—something the past year has showed us far too graphically. But if the Supreme Court is no longer functioning as a real “court,” why are we mostly still treating its output as if it were simply the “law”?

In some sense, the answer is that the Supreme Court’s power and prominence is mediated by the journalists that report on the institution, and we as journalists rely on the court for legitimacy and prominence in return. Someone has to translate legalese to the public. But the way journalists report on the institution—mostly by explaining the “law”—has set incredibly circumscribed boundaries around how the court’s political activities are viewed. The Supreme Court press corps has been largely institutionalized to treat anything the court produces as the law, and to push everything else—matters of judicial conduct, how justices are chosen and seated, ethical lapses—off to be handled by the political press. That ephemera is commentary; the cases remain the real story.

This critique of the professorial Supreme Court press corps, articulated perhaps most pointedly by David Margolick, writing in 2007 in the New York Times, is that those of us who cover the high court mostly just sit around taking dictation, reporting on the justices’ questions at oral arguments as if it’s news; reporting neutrally about the contents of their opinions; and reporting the facts of the cases as presented to us by the Supreme Court:

Try imagining any branch of government—the White House, say, or the State Department—covered solely on the basis of public events and printed releases, with nothing about its inner workings. It’s inconceivable. But that’s essentially how the Supreme Court beat works. Reporters assigned there rarely venture beyond oral arguments, briefs and decisions. Almost never do they stray from their cubicles. Part of this is perfectly sensible: the court makes most of its news through its opinions, and interpreting them, often heaps of them, at once, on tight deadlines, is damnably (and, maybe, deliberately) difficult. Those who do it well are rare, and they have little time to spare.

[newwayastrology]

See the previous post.

[reesiereads]

I need ya’ll to realize running back to TikTok like nothing fucking happened is exactly what this motherfucker wants. He wants you to run back and to be grateful. He wants you to forget that the Supreme Court has just passed something that indicates they can pursue intense censorship and remove our access to free speech and non-propagandized/monitored spaces whenever they want. He wants you to be so focused on all this that you completely forget that he’s about to pass at least a hundred horrific policies stripping us of our rights as soon as this week. He wants you to stop talking about Palestine who is still in danger and is in desperate need of aid despite the ceasefire. He wants you to turn your attention away from all the people in LA suffering thanks to the fires.

I don’t want to say it’s just an app, because it’s not. I was incredibly sad about losing TikTok yesterday. Many of us had a community that meant a great deal to us torn away suddenly and I am not saying we shouldn’t be upset about that. But I am saying that as much as the Supreme Court has more important things they should be focusing on over banning TikTok we have more important things to do then run back to an app that was obviously used for a publicity stunt by Trump and will inevitably be influenced by him and his fascism.

We’ve been discussing boycotting Instagram, Facebook, Twitter/X, and other Meta platforms due to their connections to Trump and his posse of billionaires. TikTok must be treated the same way so long as the CEO and company is in Trump’s pocket.

[weadvocate]

JUDICIAL CORRUPTION FUN FACT ABOUT FRANKLIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE MARK HUMMER THE BAR GUILD CONTINUES TO COVER UP AND COUNTLESS OTHER MEMBERS OF THE GUILD BAR CARD HOLDER CLUB OF CRIMINAL RICO RACKETEERS

LETTER TO OHIO BAR IN GRIEVANCE THEY KEEP TRYING TO CONCEAL FROM YOU PUBLIC AND ATTACK THE WHISTLEBLOWER – INTRODUCING MARK HUMMER, THE CRIMINAL MASTERMIND OF THE LOWEST COURT, HE IS A ABSOLUTE PIECE OF SHIT FRAUDSTERS ON THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WARING AGAINST THE UNITED STATES FOR COVERING UP FELONIOUS CRIMES ARREST HIM AND EVERY FEDERAL AND STATE ACTOR CONSPIRATOR CALL TO ACTION AS…

[revev2]

A Day of Reckoning for Justice in Tunisia

Tomorrow, Friday, January 24, 2025, marks a pivotal moment for the Tunisian judiciary—a day it will either uphold its dignity or tarnish its reputation further. The court is set to deliver its verdict in what has come to be known as the “racism case” involving Sonia Dahmani. In a fair and independent judicial system, the verdict should have been issued directly after the appeals hearing held two…

[michelesayre]

Conversations From the Road - Retrospective 2024: From Dissent to Resistance and More

I’ll never forget the day the US Supreme Court handed down the decision that there is such a thing as ‘presidential immunity’ (there isn’t- it was a bullshit term used by Richard Nixon to try and justify his shit). Justice Sonya Sotomayor in her dissent ended it with not the usual, “I respectfully dissent” but with “I dissent”. I think this is the best two-word response to Trump and company’s…

[boreal-sea]

Putting this as a meme so maybe y'all will actually read it.

Held: Under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of Presidential power entitles a former President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority. And he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts.

And this is why we cannot let Trump win another term: he now has complete immunity for any acts he "officially" performs as president. You thought he was bad before? Now he will have zero fear. He will do whatever he wants. And what he wants is outlined in Project 2025.

[thecenterline]

White House Urges Senate Democrats to Confirm Judges Before Term Ends

As President Joe Biden’s administration faces a looming deadline, the White House is urging Senate Democrats to expedite the confirmation of up to 30 federal judges before the new Congress takes over on January 3rd, 2025. With Republicans gaining control of 53 seats in the Senate following last week’s elections, Democrats are racing against time to confirm Biden’s nominees before Donald Trump’s…

[oxytocinatrocities]

A comic I drew about leaving the Mormon church.

Can also apply to other things. Ex. constitutional originalism in the US

[megayogiposts]

RTI Application Status: Scholarship Scam Investigation

Registration NumberPCLKO/R/2024/60869NameYogi M P SinghDate of Filing20/11/2024StatusRTI REQUEST RECEVED as on 20/11/2024  PIO Details  PIO NAMEधनंजय सिंह कुशवाहाDesinnationADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICEPhone No.9140770107Email Idjansuchanalko@gmil.com  Nodal Officer Details  Nameधनंजय सिंह कुशवाहEmail-IDjansuchanalko@gmail.com Online RTI Request Form Details Public Authority Details…

[preetisinghuniverse]

Public Grievance on NHM UP Vacancies: Seek Answers

संदर्भ संख्या : 60000240224917 , दिनांक – 14 Nov 2024 तक की स्थिति आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण : शिकायत संख्या:- 60000240224917 आवेदक का नाम- Yogi M. P. Singh विषय- An application under article 51 A of the constitution of India to make inquiry regarding the advertisement concerning notification of vacancy which details are as follows. Ref. No: 642/SPMU/NHM/2022-23/6200 Date: 26.11. 2022 State…

[socialistexan]

[mysharona1987]

So SCOTUS has just given Joe Biden the funniest way to end this election, ever.

[weadvocate]

OHIO JUDGE OF FRANKLIN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS GENERAL FUN FACT OF HER CORRUPTION AND OTHER STATE ACTORS OF THE COURT FRAUDING AND SCAMMING

Kimberly Cocroft is neglecting duty in office, acting in individual capacity as a complicit activewillful and voluntary group member of separate distinct enterprise perpetrating corruptive and criminalpatterns of practice on the Court and through the Court as vessel. She is intentionally case fixing andmanipulating case scheduling and process in the case where emergency protective order has been…