#Quan Pei Lun | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

bookofjin · 7 years

Text

Biography of Jia Mi

[From JS040. JS might not always be the most sober history.]

Mi, courtesy name Changshen. His mother Jia Wan was Chong's youngest daughter. His father, Han Shou, courtesy name Dezhen, was a native of Duyang in Nanyang and was the great grandson of Wei's Minister over the Masses, Ji. He had a pleasing bearing and countenance, and had a good appearances and deportment. Jia Chong nominated him to be on the staff of the Minister of Works.

Always when Chong banqueted guests and companions, his daughter every time spied on them from within the green and gold nest [?]. She saw Shou and was pleased with him. She asked her left and right if they knew who this person was or not. There was a servant girl who explained Shou's family and courtesy name, and said he was her former master. The daughter had great feelings and thoughts, and professed it waking and sleeping [?].

The servant girl later went to Shou's house, and set out and arranged the daughter's thoughts, and also talked of the daughter's brilliance, beauty, allure and independence, a special beauty surpassing the natural order. Shou heard and his heart moved, he expediently made her pass on his abundant diligence [?]. The servant girl accordingly reported to the daughter. The daughter thereupon secretly cultivated voice and excellence [?], to greatly bestow and connect with each other [?]. She called for Shou to enter at dusk. Shou's strength and nimbleness exceeded other people, he crossed over the wall and arrived. Within the house nobody knew, however when Chong woke up, his daughter's happiness and joy was different from ordinary days.

At the time the Western Regions had sent in tribute an unusual fragrance, if once worn by a person then for a month it would not disappear. The Emperor considerably valued it, and only accordingly bestowed it on Chong and the Great Marshal, Chen Qian [JS035]. His daughter secretly stole it and accordingly presented it to Shou. Chong's companions and subordinates feasted with Shou [?] and heard of his fragrance and scent, they talked about it to Chong.

From this Chong thought he knew the daughter and Shou were communicating, but his gates and posterns were strict and stern, and he did not understand in what way he had managed to enter. Therefore in the middle of the night, he feigned surprise [?], and relying on saying there were robbers, had someone sent to follow the wall to thereby observe it for changes. Left and right reported, saying:

Nothing beyond the usual [?], however the northern-eastern corner was as if a fox or raccoon-dog had walked there.

Chong therefore examined and questioned the daughter's left and right, drawing up accordingly a descriptive reply [?]. Chong kept it secret, and therepon had the daughter marry Shou. Shou's official rank reached Cavalier in Regular Attendance and Intendant of Henan. He passed on at the beginning of Yuankang [291 – 299], and was bestowed General of Agile Cavalry.

Mi excelled at studying, and had a talent for pondering. When he had became Chong's heir, and afterwards of continuing to assist the instructions, when also Emperor monopolized and indulged herself, Mi's power surpassed the ruler. Arriving therefore linking succession [?] Attendant Gentleman of the Yellow Gates, he became powerful and blessed like this. He carried his haughty favour, his extravagant luxuriousness transgressed the norms, the house eves revered and usurped [?], his receptacles and clothes were precious and magnificent, [he had] singing servant boys and dancing women, selecting the utmost in a single season.

He opened the postern and delayed visitors. Within the Seas the spokes joined [at him], he valued travelling prominent relatives and the movement of drifting contention [?], and could not but exhaust the rites and affairs with them. Some displayed writings and compositions to talk to and please Mi, thereby just so buying friendship.

Shi Chong [JS031] and Ouyang Jian [JS031] of Bohai, Pan Yue [JS055] of Xingyang, Lu Ji [JS054] and Lu Yun [JS054] of Wu state, Mou Zheng of Lanling, Du Bin and Zhi Yu [JS051] of Jingzhao, Zhuge Quan of Langye, Wang Cui of Hongong, Du Yu of Xiangcheng, Zou Jie of Nanyang, Zuo Si [JS092] of Qi sate, Cui Ji of Qinghe, Liui Gui of Pei state, He Yu and Zhou Hui of Runan, Qian Xiu [JS060] of Anping, Chen Zhen of Yingchuan, Guo Zhang [JS040] of Taiyuan, Xu Meng of Gaoyang, Liu Ne of Pengcheng, and Liu Yu [JS062] and Liu Kun [JS062] of Zhongshan, all tutored and met with Mi. They were called the Twenty-Four Friends. The remainder did not manage to prepare for him [?].

He was successively ranked Cavalier in Regular Attendance and General of the Army of the Rear. When the Countess of Guangcheng passed away, he left his post. The mourning was not yet at an end, when he rose up to be Overseer of the Private Writers, to be in charge of the state's history.

Before this, the Imperial Court had discussed establishing the boundary limits of the Book of Jin. The Overseer of the Palace Writers, Xun Xu [JS039] said they ought to use the starting year of Wei's Zhengshi [240 – 249]. The Gentleman Drafter, Wang Zan, desired the court officials from Jiaping [249 – 253] onwards to exhaustively enter the history of Jin. At that time there was hesitations and there had not been a decision.

When Emperor Hui was established, they furthermore had discussions about it. Mi sent up an opinion, requesting to conform to [?] Taishi [265 – 274] as the cut off point. Hence the affair was sent down to the Three Offices. The Minister over the Masses, Wang Rong [JS043], the Minister of Works, Zhang Hua [JS036], the General who Leads the Army, Wang Yan [JS043], the Palace Attendant Yue Guang [JS043], the Attendant Gentleman of the Yellow Gates, Ji Shao [JS089] and the Broad Scholar of the Sons of State, Xie Heng, all followed Mi's opinion. The Chief Commandant of Cavalry, the Marquis of Jibei, Xun Jun, the Palace Attendant Xun Fan [JS039] and the Attendant Gentleman of the Yellow Gates, Hua Hun, considered to be proper to use Zhengshi as beginning the inauguration. The Broad Scholars Xun Xi and Diao Xie [JS06] said it was proper [to use] the starting year of Jiaping. Mi heavily took charge of [?] memorialising Rong and Hua's opinions, the affair was thereupon carried out.

He was appointed and moved to Palace Attendant, acting as Overseer of the Private Writers like before. Mi at the time accompanied the Emperor to favour the Xuanwu watchtower for a barricade hunt. At the reciting of the Book of Documents within the assembly [the Emperor?] summoned Mi to accept the bows [?]. He admonished left and right to not make people know. Hence the multitudes suspected him for having disloyal aspirations.

Mi was already intimate and valued, and several times entered the two palaces, roaming the place together with the Heir-Apparent Minhuai, without yielding or surrendering his heart. He in board games with the Heir-Apparent would quarrel over the rules. The King of Chengdu, Ying, was sitting [next to them] and with a severe countenance said:

The August Heir-Apparent is the state's next lord. Jia Mi, how can you be discourteous!

Mi was afraid, and spoke of it to the Empress. Thereupon [she] sent out Ying to be General who Pacifies the North, headquartered at Ye.

When he became Regular Attendant, he attended discussions in the Eastern Palace. The Heir-Apparent's mind was not happy, and Mi worried about it. And in his household there several times was strange and unusual events. A whirlwind blew away his court clothes, flying high for several hundred zhang, and fell down within the chancellor's palace [?]. Also a snake set out from within its midst. At night violent thunder shook his house. A pillar sunk into the ground, and crushed and destroyed [his] bed and screen. Mi was increasing afraid. When he moved to Palace Attendant, he monopolized and was in charge of the forbidden interiors. Thereupon he and the Empress completed their plan, to defame and destroy the Heir-Apparent.

When the King of Zhao, Lun, deposed the Empress, he used a decree to summon Mi to the front of the hall, wanting to slay him. He ran to enter beneath the Western Bell [?], and with a shout said:

Dear Empress [阿后] save me!

Thereupon [they] approached and beheaded him. Han Shou's youngest brother Wei was a expected [to become] a capacity. He and Shou's elder brother, the Prefect of Gong, Bao, his younger brothers the Cavalier Attendant Gentleman, Yu, and the Companion of the King of Wu [?], Jian, and Mi's mother Jia Wan were all sentenced to execution.

Earlier, at the time when Chong attacked Wu, he once garrisoned Xiangcheng. Within the army [they] suddenly lost Chong's whereabouts [?]. Chong's Chief Controller Beneath the Tent, Zhou Qin at time was having a nap, he dreamt he saw more than a hundred people taking [?] Chong, pulling him into a single pathway. Qin woke with a startle, and heard they had lost Chong. He thereupon set out to seek and search, suddenly he was looking at the road from the dream. Thereupon he went to look for him. As a result he saw Chong moving to arrive at single office building, the attendant guards were considerably abundant. The lord of the office sat facing south, his voice and countenance considerably surpassed [ordinary people?]. He spoke to Chong, saying:

There is about to be chaos in the affairs of my household, surely you and Xun Xu is already misleading my son, and also will make chaos for my grandson. [I] covertly made Ren Kai demote you, yet [you] did not leave. [I] also made Yu Chun scold you, yet [you] did not change. Now when the bandits of Wu are to be pacified, you just now petitioned to behead Zhang Hua. Your dismal stupidity, is always of this kind. If [you] do not repent meticulously, [you] will from dawn to dusk add to [your] crimes.

Chong because of that knocked his head so blood flowed. The lord said:

You, though [you] delay the sun and moon, are yet a famous receptacle like this, That is for [your] deeds in guarding the office, and that is all. In the end [I?] will make [your] inheritor die at the inside of a bell's frame, the older child perish among golden alcohol, the younger child bound up beneath a withered tree. Xun Xu likewise ought to be the same, but for his ancestors' virtue less intense [?]. Because of your descendants [?], outside of several generations, the state's inheritance likewise will change.

He finished speaking, and instructed him to leave. Chong suddenly managed to return to the encampment, his facial appearance was worn-out and haggard, his natural reasoning [?]dulled and lost, after a day it returned.

And so Mi died beneath a bell, Empress Jia submitted to gold alcohol and died, Jia Wu was examined thoroughly with a great stick. In the end everything was like he said.

At the defeat of the King of Zhao, Lun, the imperial court posthumously recounted Chong's deeds, and discussed establishing his heir. They desired to use Chong's grandnephew the Cavalier Attendant Gentleman Zhong as the successor. Chong pretended to be mad to excuse himself. They used his son Xiu to succed Chong, and enfeoffed him Duke of Lu. He also became ill and died. In the middle of Yongxing [304 – 306], established Chong's great grandnephew Zhan as Duke of Lu, to serve as Chong's descendant. He came across chaos and died, and the state was abolished.

In the middle of Taishi [265 – 274], people had a song about Chong and others which said:

Jia, Pei Wang; chaos in the strands and guideropes. Wang, Pei, Jia; aids Under Heaven.

They spoke of destroying Wei and forming Jin.

#js040

9 notes · View notes

killerandhealerqueen · 2 years

Note

If you could create a show of your own,

who will be part of the cast?

what is the show about? will it be a drama series or movie?

what would be the genre?

happy ending or sad? or bittersweet?

what would it focus on? relationships? or the genre? (cases for detective, or forensics)

which female roles would you add? any byn-type ones to piss ppl off? or Chu Ran-type ones only?

if no censorship, what would you add in there? (assuming its cn dramas)

what else would you add and/or leave out that's not asked here?

Oh...oh my sweet baby fucking jesus this is going to be fun (I'm also very picky about what I want so...*sucks in air between teeth* y'all've been warned)

1. who will be part of the cast?

Okay so the Killer and Healer cast but do what Checkmate fucking did and give them new roles. Mao Zijun and Ian are the leads obvi (and we can even have Chen Yu Cheng and Quan Pei Lun play the second couple)

2. what is the show about? will it be a drama series or movie?

I'd say drama series. You can put more stuff into dramas than you can movies and you can flesh things out a little bit more. But the series wouldn't be too overly drawn out...no ridiculous number of episodes. Between 24-40 episodes is good. I think personally that's the right amount. If you can't fit it between that many episodes, you gotta cut the unimportant shit (but still have some filler because filler is good and if the show gets too plot heavy, we need a break to let our brains breathe)

3. what would be the genre?

Genre would probably be either wuxia or detective/mystery/investigation, since that's what I'm typically drawn to. Hell, even mafia. I'd take that.

But if it's detective/mystery/investigation, we gotta do shit 👏🏻 by 👏🏻 the 👏🏻 book 👏🏻 (like, follow quality assurance guidelines and shit so that people don't fucking comment and say that's not how you do shit. Like, we will get fucking EXPERTS/I will step in so that shit is as accurate as possible. If medical dramas can do that, so can fucking detective dramas). Also, if we’re doing detective/mystery/investigation, the cases can’t be too complicated/the science can’t be too complicated because we want viewers to be interested, not overwhelmed. (But we also don’t want to have to explain everything to them like it’s a science class, you know?)

And if it's Wuxia, we need to have 1) good fucking wigs and 2) pretty fucking clothing/costumes. Oh, and believable fight scenes. I want good fucking fight scenes

4. happy ending or sad? or bittersweet?

Happy ending. Angst with a happy ending. That's my perfect ending. I don't/can't do sad endings (thanks K&H) and bittersweet endings are not particularly my cup of tea. Hopeful endings aren't bad but also not really a fan of that. No cliff hangers either, unless we're planning on making a season 2 but if I've told the story I wanted to tell, we end on a happy ending. And no bullshit endings either. Don't waste my fucking time (I’m looking at you MRIAD)

5. what would it focus on? relationships? or the genre? (cases for detective, or forensics)

I'd want the drama to focus on both. Sure just focusing on one over the other is fine but there needs to be a balance. If you focus too much on the cases over the relationships, shit gets boring real fast and all of the characters feel boring and one dimensional. And if you focus on the relationships over the cases, it's like what's the fucking point of having a detective/case drama if you're not going to focus on it

6. which female roles would you add? any byn-type ones to piss ppl off? or Chu Ran-type ones only?

Only Chu Ran-like roles, please. She needs to have purpose and not just be there to be a pretty face or to be the love interest (not saying that it's bad if she is one but I don't particularly care for those types of damsel-in-distress characters). I need sustenance from my female characters please. We'll have characters like Chu Ran, Ma Han, Jiang Ling, Zhong Yiren. Like they can still be feminine but for the love of god give them a brain. Hell, I'd even let some of them be villains because we need more female villains, thanks

7. if no censorship, what would you add in there? (assuming its cn dramas)

If no censorship...handholding, forehead touches, face cupping/neck cupping, neck caress (yes, the Jiang Yuelou neck caress has me in a fucking chokehold)...I don't particularly think there needs to be any kissing as long as the audience can see that the two leads are fucking in love with each other (and with Zijun and Ian as the leads, there's not gonna be a problem there)

8. what else would you add and/or leave out that's not asked here?

I don't think I have anything else to add...I said what I needed to be said

Thanks for asking this jiejie, this was fun!

#sass answers #jiejie edition

2 notes · View notes

supportingasianactorsactresses · 2 years

Text

Quan Pei Lun Drama update

15/03/2023 Source: 权沛伦 (weibo) Post: 凡人雪陵身弱无力，但爱意却可无坚不摧！仙尊雪陵神力磅礴，但情意却似水缠绵。凡人雪陵和仙尊雪陵你更喜欢哪个呢？#重紫 #重紫之雪仙情 The mortal Xueling is weak and powerless, but his love can be indestructible! The immortal Xueling has majestic power, but his love is like water. Which do you like better, the mortal Xueling or the immortal Xueling? #ChongZi #ChongZiSnowImmortalLove ~ Tati

View On WordPress

0 notes

tytangfei · 3 years

Photo

This is not love yet I am haunted by you.

105 notes · View notes

kdram-chjh · 4 years

Photo

Cdrama: The Romance of Tiger and Rose (2020)

Gifs of Intro of cdrama “The Romance of Tiger and Rose”

#The Romance of Tiger and Rose #2020 #传闻中的陈芊芊 #Chuan Wen Zhong De Chen Qian Qian #The Rumored Third Princess #Zhao Lu Si #Ding Yu Xi #Sheng Ying Hao #Zhou Zi Xin #Quan Pei Lun #Chen Ming Hao #Tencent

47 notes · View notes

hoanvu-2016-us · 5 years

Text

Học giả khắp thế giới viết thư cho Tập Cận Bình, đòi quyền tự do ngôn luận cho dân Trung quốc

(bởi adminTD, 24/02/2020)

China change

Dịch giả: Nguyệt Quang Bảo, 22-2-2020

(truy cập từ https://baotiengdan.com/2020/02/24/cac-hoc-gia-khap-the-gioi-viet-thu-cho-tap-can-binh-doi-quyen-tu-do-ngon-luan-cho-dan-trung-quoc/)

Bức thư này do 3 giáo sư sau đây khởi xướng: Andrew Nathan, University of Columbia; Perry Link, University of California at Riverside; Zhang Lun, Universitéde Cergy-Pontoise. Hãy tham gia cùng họ, như nhiều đồng nghiệp của họ đã làm, để ký tên vào bức thư này. Vui lòng gửi tên và chức danh của quý vị tới: chinacitizenmovement@gmail. Danh sách ký tên sẽ được cập nhật hằng ngày.

Từ trái qua: GS Andrew Nathan, ĐH (đại học) Columbia; GS Perry Link, ĐH Riverside (UCR) và GS Zhang Lun, ĐH Cergy-Pontoise (UCP). (Photo Courtesy)

Ông Tập Cận Bình, chủ tịch Trung quốc:

Chúng tôi giật mình và hoảng hốt khi được biết việc bắt giam Hứa Chí Vĩnh (许志永/Xu Zhiyong) bằng bạo lực vừa rồi ở Quảng Châu. [Ông Hứa Chí Vĩnh] là một nhà hoạt động dân sự và có bằng tiến sỹ Luật từ đại học Bắc Kinh.

Cách đây chỉ vài hôm, ngày 6/2/2020, Lý Văn Lượng, một bác sỹ và là một người lên tiếng cảnh báo sớm về sự lây lan của virus corona ở Vũ Hán, đã chết vì những nỗ lực của ông ấy nhằm cứu giúp đồng bào mình. Khi bác sỹ Lý phát hiện ra sự lây lan của virus đó, ông ta đã khuyên một nhóm nhỏ bạn bè và người thân phòng ngừa nó. Hành động đó đã dẫn tới vụ công an đến gõ cửa nhà ông Lý.

Ông ấy bị triệu tập đến đồn công an, bị đe doạ, và bị ra lệnh phải im lặng về vấn đề virus đó. Sự hạn chế tự do ngôn luận này đã biến Trung quốc thành một môi trường bỏ ngỏ cho virus đó có điều kiện tự do tung hoành và mang thảm hoạ vào. Khi tin tức về bác sỹ Lý lộ được ra ngoài, liền theo đó là một làn sóng căm phẫn của dân chúng trên toàn quốc. Những lời kêu gọi tự do ngôn luận đã trở nên mãnh liệt.

Tin tức về sự bắt giữ tùy tiện ông Hứa Chí Vĩnh chỉ làm trầm trọng thêm sự khủng hoảng về tự do ngôn luận ở Trung quốc mà thôi.

Chúng tôi biết nhiều lời chỉ trích thẳng thắn của Hứa Chí Vĩnh về chính phủ Trung quốc và cá nhân ông. Nhưng chúng tôi cũng nhớ lại rằng, khi ông lên nắm quyền vào năm 2012 ông cũng tuyên bố ý định của ông hướng về “cai trị theo hiến pháp”.

Điều 35 của hiến pháp Trung quốc quy định rằng: “Công dân của nước cộng hoà nhân dân Trung quốc sẽ có quyền tự do về ngôn luận, về báo chí, về hội họp, về biểu tình, và phản kháng”. Điều 41 quy định: “Công dân nước cộng hoà nhân dân Trung Hoa có quyền đưa ra những phê bình hoặc gợi ý đối với bất kỳ một cơ quan nhà nước nào và bất kỳ một nhân viên công quyền nào”.

Quan điểm của Hứa Chí Vĩnh chắc chắn là thực sự bất đồng với quan điểm của chính phủ; nhưng tất cả những quan điểm đó đều nằm trong phạm vi tự do biểu đạt và gợi ý mang tính phê phán được bảo đảm bởi hiến pháp của Trung quốc.

Với tư cách là một người đứng đầu chính phủ, ông có một bổn phận phải tôn trọng những sự phân tích và những chính kiến khác với những phân tích và chính kiến của riêng ông, cho dù sự khác biệt đó có tới mức cực đoan cũng vậy. Điều động các cơ quan chính phủ vào việc trấn áp phê bình và chối bỏ quyền tự do ngôn luận là vi phạm hiến pháp Trung quốc và làm giảm thiểu phẩm chất của cả nhà nước Trung quốc lẫn cá nhân ông.

Cho nên, chúng tôi cảm thấy buộc phải lên tiếng bày tỏ sự quan tâm sâu xa của chúng tôi về việc bắt giam Hứa Chí Vĩnh (và những vụ bắt giam những người bạn của ông ấy là Ding Jiaxi, Zhang Zhongshun, Dai Zhenya, và Li Yingjun hôm 26/12/2019); chúng tôi yêu cầu chính phủ Trung quốc phải chứng tỏ rằng mình đã thấm nhuần được bài học về triệu chứng Lý Văn Lượng bằng cách thả ngay lập tức những công dân vô tội là Hứa Chí Vĩnh và các đồng sự của ông ta, bằng cách chấm dứt sách nhiễu các quyền công dân ngay lập tức, và trả lại quyền tự do ngôn luận cho người dân Trung quốc.

Trân trọng,

1. Tomoko Ako, University of Tokyo 阿古智子, 东京大学教授

2. Geremie R Barmé, Australian National University 白杰明, 澳大利亚国立大学荣休教授

3. Robert Barnett, SOAS University of London 伦敦大学亚非学院研究员

4. Jean-Philippe Béja, Institut de politique de Paris 白夏, 巴黎政治大学教授

5. Joseph Bosco, The Hill Newspaper 《国会山报》专栏作家

6. Anthony W Bradley, Edinburgh University/Oxford University 爱丁堡大学荣休教授/牛津大学访问学者

7. Anne-Marie Brady, University of Canterbury 坎特伯雷大学教授

8. Jean-Pierre Cabestan, Hong Kong Baptist University 香港浸会大学教授

9. Kevin Carrico, Monash University 凱大熊, 莫那什大学资深研究员

10. Josephine Chiu-Duke, Professor, Asian Studies Department, University of British Columbia 不列颠哥伦比亚大学教授

11. Donald Clarke, George Washington University 郭丹青, 乔治华盛顿大学教授

12. Jerome A. Cohen, New York University 孔杰荣, 纽约大学资深教授

13. Alison W. Conner, University of Hawaii at Manoa 夏威夷大学马诺阿分校教授

14. Michael C. Davis, Columbia University戴大為, 哥伦比亚大学教授

15. Larry Diamond, Stanford University 戴雅门, 斯坦福大学教授

16. June Teufel Dreyer, University of Miami 金德芳, 迈阿密大学教授

17. Michael S. Duke, Emeritus Professor, Asian Studies Department, University of British Columbia 杜迈可, 不列颠哥伦比亚大学荣休教授

18. Marion Eggert, Ruhr University Bochum 梅綺雯, 波鸿大学教授

19. Joseph W. Esherick, University of California, San Diego 周锡瑞, 加州大学圣迭戈分校荣休教授

20. Feng Chongyi, University of Technology Sydney 冯崇义, 悉尼科技大学教授

21. Antonia Finnane, University of Melbourne 墨尔本大学教授

22. Magnus Fiskesjo, Cornell University 馬思中, 康奈尔大学副教授

23. Martin S. Flaherty, Princeton University 普林斯顿大学教授

24. Eli Friedman, Cornell University 康奈尔大学副教授

25. Edward Friedman, University of Wisconsin 威斯康星大学荣休教授

26. Terence Halliday, Australian National University 澳大利亚国立大学教授

27. Andrew James Harding, National University of Singapore 安德馨, 新加坡国立大学教授

28. Nicholas Calvin Howson, University of Michigan Law School 郝山, 密西根大学讲席讲授

29. Victoria Hui, University of Notre Dame 許田波, 圣母大学副教授

30. Katrin Kinzelbach, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg 石小琳, 纽伦堡大学教授

31. Thomas E. Kellogg, Georgetown University Law Center 郭汤姆, 乔治城大学亚洲法中心执行主任

32. Heinz Klug, University of Wisconsin 威斯康星大学教授

33. Steven I. Levine, University of Montana 蒙塔纳大学教授

34. Margaret K. Lewis, Seton Hall University 陸梅吉, 塞顿霍尔大学教授

35. Perry Link, University of California at Riverside 林培瑞, 加州大学河滨分校教授

36. Barrett L. McCormick, Professor of Political Science Department, Marquette University 马凯特大学政治学教授

37. Andrew Nathan, University of Columbia 黎安友, 哥伦比亚大学教授

38. Mareike Ohlberg, Mercator Institute for China Studies 墨卡托中国研究所研究员

39. Minxin Pei, Claremont McKenna College 裴敏欣, 克莱蒙特·麦肯纳学院教授

40. Eva Pils, King’s College London 艾华, 伦敦国王学院教授

41. Pitman B. Potter, University of British Columbia 不列颠哥伦比亚大学教授

42. Heiner Roetz, Bochum University 罗德海, 波鸿大学教授

43. Wojciech Sadurski, University of Sydney/University of Warsaw 萨德沃, 悉尼大学/华沙大学教授

44. David Schak, Griffith University 澳大利亚格里菲斯大学荣休教授

45. Cheryl Saunders, University of Melbourne 桑雪丽, 墨尔本大学教授

46. James Simpson, Harvard University 哈佛大学教授

47. Mahendra P. Singh, National Law University, Delhi 辛默涵, 印度德里国家法科大学教授

48. Dorothy J. Solinger, University of California, Irvine 加州大学尔湾分校教授

49. Ken Suzuki, Meiji University 铃木贤, 明治大学教授

50. Teng Biao, City University of New York 滕彪, 纽约城市大学兼任教授

51. Edith Terry, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 香港科技大学兼任教授

52. Glenn Tiffert, Hoover Institution 谭安, 胡佛研究所研究员

53. Rory Truex, Princeton University 普林斯顿大学助理教授

54. Steve Tsang, SOAS University of London 伦敦大学亚非学院教授

55. Alex Wang, UCLA 王立德, 加州大学洛杉矶分校教授

56. Jeremy Webber, University of Victoria 韦杰儒, 加拿大维多利亚大学教授

57. Martin K. Whyte, John Zwaanstra Professor of International Studies and Sociology, Emeritus, Department of Sociology, Harvard University 怀默霆, 哈佛大学荣退教授

58. Andrea Worden, John Hopkins University 吳玉婷, 霍普金斯大学兼任教授

59. Ming Xia, CUNY-Gradute Center 夏明, 纽约城市大学研究生院教授

60. Stephen M. Young, Global Taiwan Institute 全球台湾研究所研究员

61. Lun Zhang, Universitéde Cergy-Pontoise 张伦, 法国赛尔奇·蓬多瓦兹大学教授

0 notes