#Popularist

[kylewalker-peters]

can the racists and political establishment wrap this flag discourse up already so we can move on to hating the away kit for being ugly rather than our sexy little bisexual flag

[liminalpsych]

"Whenever it happened that he could not withstand the insults of these unclean spirits, the Gospel of St. John was placed on his lap and the spirits vanished at once, fluttering away like birds. If afterwards, however, Geoffrey Arthur's History of the Kings of Britain were placed on his lap instead, the demons would land in greater numbers not only all over his body but all over the book as well, settling in for longer than usual and being even more annoying."

Gerald of Wales, The Journey Through Wales (Itinerarium Kambriae), 1.5, 1188 C.E.

I am dying, he's so mad about Geoffrey's book

[centrally-unplanned]

If I am gonna be an electoral popularist I gotta be a consistent popularist - I may think the idea of 'price gouging grocery police' to be very dumb, but it is popular! Americans hate high prices and blame companies, by huge margins, and are not economists and so don't really care if a price is "market clearing" or not. Particularly for a Dem politican, where anti-corporate is far more The Brand, it is probably a good issue to run on.

The important part is to just not do it when you win. Voters don't care and won't notice, they care about lower prices and such, so just do things that will *actually* help reduce costs and they will reward you for it (or, "reward", voters typically don't reward you for anything and sometimes actively punish you for your successes, but you won't be called out as a hypocrit or w/e at least)

And it is super vague anyway, right? Market collusion is *already* illegal, companies do do that (here is a current case in the meat industry!), we punish them now; you can keep doing that, increase enforcement, etc. You can just say doubling down on FTC actions in accordance with a 'new federal guideline' that is just defacto the same as the old guidelines But We Mean It This Time is your policy, and you arent even lying! Tons of rules go underenforced, this is fine. Wont change prices much ofc because the grocery industry just isnt that kind of space, but done right it can help at the margins.

One side of the popularist coin is that voters do actually care about issues, they are 'smart' and notice if you are hot airing them while endorsing different beliefs. They dont in fact vote solely on vibes. The other side though is that they are also dumb, and dont have any real theories of change but instead grab-bag, shallow policy preferences that they don't stick to if the underlying problem solves itself. Lower housing prices and they will not care if you did it via rent control or supply side reforms. Being a good politician is seeing where they care and where they don't.

[paranoia-culture-is]

paranioa culture is I don't trust myself, don't trust anybody else and that makes me the most popularist girl (not)

.

[cadavagerr]

You may have seen Anthony Boyle on your screens recently as Harry Crosby in Apple tvs 'Masters of the air' or as Kevin Maxwell in 'Tetris', but where have you probably seen him before?

Before he rose to fame in 2016, he was in an episode of 'Game of thrones' as a Bolton Guard in the episode 'The laws of gods and men'. But he doesnt stay for long as he gets his throat cut.

His rise to fame started in 2016 when he landed the role of Scorpius Malfoy in the play 'Harry Potter and the Cursed Child' for which he was nominated for an Olivier and won. He went from a small local actor from Belfast to suddenly the main actor in a play that the world couldn't stop talking about. He spent three years running around in a blonde wig at the Palace theatre in London and the Lyric theatre in New York where the play is still shown to this day.

After this, he landed small roles such as David Donnely in 'Derry Girls', a comedy which is set in the town of Derry in Northern Ireland which is his home country. His friend, the writter of the show, approached him and asked him if he wanted to be in the show and he accepted, being in it for two episodes.

In 2018, he was cast as Jack Argyle in the BBC drama 'Ordeal by Innocence' which was written by Agatha Christie. A show about a family of adopted children who must work out who killed their mother, unfortunately, the blame is landed on Anthony Boyle's character.

In the same year, he played Liam Farrell in the drama series 'Come home' where he starred along side Christopher Eccleston. A mother unexpectedly abandons her husband and three children and they try to figure out what may have caused this.

In the year after, he played the role of Geoffrey Bache Smith in the biopic 'Tolkien' about the life of JRR Tolkien. Boyle plays one of thr actors closest friends through their time at school and during the war.

In 2020, he was in 'The plot against American' featuring Wynona Ryder. Based on the 2004 book by the same name, the story follows a Jewish working class family set in an alternate America where they watch popularist Charles Lindbergh, an aviator-hero and xenophobe, become President.

In 2021, he played Brian Wood in the true story of 'Danny Boy', a soldier who is accused of war crimes in Iraq.

2022 was a quiet year for Boyle as covid had stopped the production of most tv shows and movies but in 2023, Boyle starred along side Taron Egerton and Toby Jones as Kevin Maxwell in the biopic 'Tetris' which revolves around the game Tetris, its origins and how it became one of the most famous video games in history.

However, in 2024, Boyle seems to have won the lottery with four projects coming out this year already. The first, 'Masters of the air' where he plays an air sick navigator in world war two with Austin Butler. The series which is made by Apple tv is set to be released over two months from January 26th to March 15th.

And if you're not already sick of seeing his face, his new show (surprise surprise, on Apple tv) is set to release on March 15th. Boyle plays the famous actor John Wilkes Booth in 'Manhunt' who assasinated President Lincoln in 1865 and follows the days after this as the nation slides to a halt in the search for the actor.

He is then set to play Jack Barak in the Disney plus show 'Shardlake' which is set on the book by the same name. Set in the reign of King Henry VIII in the 16th century, Boyle plays former Cromwell henchman turned law clerk and investigator for the main character.

Boyle is also set to feature in the New York times best seller book adaptation say nothing which is about the struggles and troubkes in northern ireland which comes out this summer.

These are just some of the many tv shows, movies and theatre shows that Anthony Boyle has and will star in. When he was just starting out acting, he said that he would take any role that fit his description (white male with dark brown hair) meaning he was in alot of embarassing but funny stuff. One where he dresses up as a mummy for halloween and must escape a group of killer clowns, one where he plays a man who is inlove with a pillow and one where he plays a convict on the run in Northern Ireland and has to wear a dress and a wig to escape authorities. However, if you lived in Belfast in the late 2000s, you could probably see him lurking behind big Tescos with a plastic bag on his head.

It seems that Boyle is turning out to be a very promising actor with lots of work lined up. Infact, he is set to record a new show which is set in Scotland. He said on the British talk show 'Sunday Brunch' that he is looking forward to it and has to talk in a Scottish accent.

[discluded]

The latest standard pop article refers to Chat and Khem's relationship as a bromance at this rate by the end of this leg of the press tour they will be referred to as brothers 😂

Hey, I'll coalesce these together then, if that's OK. For folks who want to, feel free to use this as a discussion post.

I've had a really long week, I've taken two different cats to the vet since Sunday so I'm not really in the mood to stir up more drama-- but... *makes grand gestures*

1.

I think the initial reaction to Pond's comment might have been overblown in the sense that it should have been something, given Pond's history of saying shit, that could be ignored. I'm perplexed by Man Suang comms account's decision to double down on this by posting the image with "Man Suang is not a bad movie; Man Suang is not a BL". Since most of the account's followers are already MileApo/Man Suang fans, I'm not sure what they were hoping to accomplish with that statement that could easily be taken the wrong way. Pond needs to say less. But I've also given up on analyzing the state of their PR/comms.

2.

It is somewhat telling to me that many people who are upset about Pond's comment and the account's statement and general straight washing of the movie are queer, though specific reactions range from actively angry on social media, quietly angry in closed fannish settings (chat, circle, servers, etc), attempt to placate other fans with empathy, or just apathetic towards the point of disengaging [read: me, due to other stress in my life]

Meanwhile, I haven't seen a single queer person go THEY NEVER PROMISED YOU A BL NEVER SAID THEY'D BE A COUPLE OR QUEER YOU'RE THE ONES WHO MADE THAT ASSUMPTION 🤪 So.

First to that--

Strawberry had shared this translation.

I realized, watching it back, this is what the autocaptioning(?)/Mint translator subbed it with:

I'm not sure if it's the lack of clarity in Thai that can be translated either way or the Mint team's translation is less specific while , but Apo also explicitly discussed that he played Khem as closeted, and it does a disservice to Apo's intentionality for the character to straight-wash the movie.

I think ultimately it depends on how one defines BL. From the classicist (ha!) perspective of the origination, BL has specific target demographic audience and definition.

Let's take these specific notes, with citations in the wikipedia entry itself:

Yaoi also known as boys' love and its abbreviation BL, is a genre of fictional media originating in Japan that features homoerotic relationships between male characters. It is typically created by women for women and is thus distinct from bara (gay manga), a genre of homoerotic media marketed to gay men. "BL" is the common term used to describe male-male romance media marketed to women in Japan and much of Asia, though its usage in the West is inconsistent.

Given these specific definitions, I would actually agree without criticism that Pond is correct that Man Suang is not a BL in the same way it takes me out when people call CMBYN a BL because that is not its genre/target demographic. I would agree Man Suang is more arthouse film like CMBYN or Carol or Moonlight, or if we're going back farther, more popluarist like LOTR or Memoirs of a Geisha or Crouching Tiger. Of course these might be different genres, but idea of a popularist film is mean to be watched by everyone, not pushed to a specific demographic (vs. for example, Marvel which is marketed towards boys and young men, but is watched by the general public.)

Similarly, back to the origins of the BL genre, queer romances and queer main characters are not solely limited by the genre of BL. Even aside from Bara, there is Josei as a genre where notable works include Sakura Gari by Yu Watase (author of Fushigi Yugi and Ceres Celestial Legend) and The Carp on the Chopping Block Jumps Twice / The Cornered Mouse Dreams of Cheese. In Seinen, there is My Brother's Husband (the mangaka is a very famous Bara author). If you haven't heard of these, that's fine, but I'm serious about how much extensive understanding I have about the delineation about the nuances of what is "technically" BL and what isn't.

There is a disconnect in the audience's definition and what BOC is trying to communicate, and that's why friction is occurring.

That being SAID, AND VERY IMPORTANTLY, let's again recognize that the definition is about the target audience being young women, and the insistence and tone of which the marketing is pushing how it's NOT for the BL audience (young women) but to everyone is quite boldly misogynist for a company that built its foundation on female consumers. Its tone is overtly that something which is made for young women is somehow inherently "not good", the same way that romcoms are somehow less valuable as art, or boy bands or handsome young singers like Justin Bieber are less talented musicians because of its target audience.

So yes, I do have a problem with the tone they're taking and I think the biting the hand that feeds it comment is spot on.

3.

Finally, about Apo tweeting and deleting. I think he held and articulated himself well in interviews, and he's been insanely patient and tolerant these past few weeks (see: laris). I actually really relate to him in that sense because I can be calm and rational but sometimes I can't help but run my mouth. I held off on answering these because I've been so stressed and just couldn't handle whatever anger it might rile up.

Expecting someone to hold their temper 100% of the time is impossible even if they manage it 99% of the time. I've also tweeted angry things I've deleted in minutes later too. And I understand his perspective in not wanting to be limited to the genre or audience of the art he creates. So Apo's (valid and expected) reaction is understandable.

--

If it's okay, I'll probably not answer any more asks about this topic for probably a while. I have some other family stuff going on (not-cat family) and I just can't deal with people who don't have to be in my life causing this nonsense while I also have to deal with people (and cats) I can't get rid of attachments to also having stuff going on.

[theantonian]

Was Mark Antony Sacrificed for Julius Caesar’s Glory?

I deeply believe that Mark Antony did not do anything without Caesar's knowledge when he was left in charge of Rome. What is most likely is that Antony did everything by Caesar’s direct orders. You cannot slaughter so many people and still remain popular and to continue represent yourself as a popularist. So, Caesar needed someone to sacrifice himself. Who could that be? Of course, Mark Antony, who else? His loyalty to Caesar was legendary, do anyone really believe that he would do anything without “advising” with the great Caesar? Caesar played the game and he won the game. Antony was not a candidate for the heir, not before not ever. Did Antony know his place in Caesar's general agenda?

Antony bought Pompey’s house, which was up for sale. But he did not have the money to pay for it. Caesar and Antony fought over the payment. According to Plutarch, Antony himself makes out that the reason why he did not take part in Caesar's African campaign was that he felt aggrieved at not having been rewarded in any way for his earlier successes. After serving him so faithfully, when Caesar returned to Rome, he punished Antony by removing him from all offices and rewarding his enemy Dolabella, who was the source of causing violent riots.

At any rate, Caesar soon realized that he would not get another man as loyal as Antony so after his return from North Africa, he singled out Antony for special honours and chose him as his colleague in consulship.

What exactly had the Dictator promised Antony in exchange for the city’s plebs suddenly supporting him as potential King of Rome at the Lupercalia festival?

Antony’s loyalty was the reason the conspirators wanted to assassinate him alongside Caesar. However, he survived the assassination and was the one who actually saved Octavian’s head by bearing the blunt of the anti-Caesareans, his master performance after Caesar's death in front of people of Rome. He was the one forced Brutus and Cassius to leave Rome. When Caesar’s so called son Octavian pretended to be sick and hid in the marshes of Philippi to avoid capture, it was Antony who defeated his murderers and avenged him.

Octavian was perhaps the first of politicians we still in power today. His mouth full of promises and the knife hidden behind his back.

Antony was Caesar’s servant and soldier, too dirty and too old for being the heir. Octavian was Caesar’s closest male relation, a rich patrician and thus a perfect choice according to Caesar.

Antony was a better man, but he was not ambitious, cold-blooded and cruel enough. He was a soldier above all, after 25 years in blood and sex it was not easy to play the saint. The old Rome died with him and path to the “emperor's throne” was open.

[xxpunkergirlxx]

wwe just said "cm punk is the hottest and most popularist girl ever" and they definitely got that one right

[jamieroxxartist]

Today, May 1, our Fun Friends in #AncientRome were getting down with the #BonaDeaFestival

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bona_Dea)

They included nocturnal rites conducted by predominantly or exclusively female initiates and female priestesses, music, dance and wine, and sacrifice of a sow. During the Roman Republican era, two such cults to Bona Dea were held at different times and locations in the city of Rome.

** Clodius and the Bona Dea scandal

The Winter rites of 62 BC were hosted by Pompeia, wife of Julius Caesar, senior magistrate in residence and pontifex maximus. Publius Clodius Pulcher, a popularist politician and ally of Caesar, was said to have intruded, dressed as a woman and intent on the hostess’s seduction. As the rites had been vitiated, the Vestals were obliged to repeat them, and after further inquiry by the senate and pontifices, Clodius was charged with desecration, which carried a death sentence. Cicero, whose wife Terentia had hosted the previous year’s rites, testified for the prosecution.

Caesar publicly distanced himself from the affair as much as possible – and certainly from Pompeia, whom he divorced because “Caesar’s wife must be above suspicion”. He had been correctly absent from the rites but as a paterfamilias he was responsible for their piety. As pontifex maximus, he was responsible for the ritual purity and piety of public and private religion. He had the responsibility to ensure that the Vestals had acted correctly, then chair the inquiry into what were essentially his own household affairs. Worse, the place of the alleged offense was the state property lent to every pontifex maximus for his tenure of office.[26] It was a high profile, much commented case. The rites remained officially secret, but many details emerged during and after the trial, and remained permanently in the public domain. They fueled theological speculation, as in Plutarch and Macrobius: and they fed the prurient male imagination – given their innate moral weakness, what might women do when given wine and left to their own devices? Such anxieties were nothing new, and underpinned Rome’s traditional strictures against female autonomy. In the political and social turmoil of the Late Republic, Rome’s misfortunes were taken as signs of divine anger against the personal ambition, religious negligence and outright impiety of her leading politicians.

Clodius’ prosecution was at least partly driven by politics. In an otherwise seemingly thorough account, Cicero makes no mention of Bona Dea’s May festival, and claims the goddess’ cult as an aristocratic privilege from the first; the impeccably patrician Clodius, Cicero’s social superior by birth, is presented as an innately impious, low-class oaf, and his popularist policies as threats to Rome’s moral and religious security. After two years of legal wrangling, Clodius was acquitted – which Cicero put down to jury-fixing and other backroom dealings – but his reputation was damaged. The scandalous revelations at the trial also undermined the sacred dignity and authority of the Vestals, the festival, the goddess, office of the pontifex maximus and, by association, Caesar and Rome itself. Some fifty years later, Caesar’s heir Octavian, later the princeps Augustus, had to deal with its repercussions.

[shoujoboy-restart]

biden will lose because of people like you

People who want a damn expansionist state not interfering with their national politics and normalizing war crimes? Well that sucks I guess.

If the democrats put someone with balls that doesn't keep making conservative-lite policies with a sprinkle of whatever popularistic demand people have to hide behind maybe more people would want to vote democrat.

Don't blame me when I do want democrats to win in the state so it's at moderately shitty while republicans are majority senate, but if most people don't care about it ain't much that can be done.

[spogwam]

Final Year Project Research - 3

Committing Cinematic Seppuku: How To Kill Your Film The Honourable Way

The intention of this essay is to inform the reader of the proper approach to killing your film, and why being able to do so is a skill of utmost importance.

Filmmakers, directors especially, are prone to covert narcissism, of one form or another. It is evident in the desire to create a piece of art that one wants to declare complete creative ownership of despite hundreds of contributors. The need to create an art piece based on your story is at its core a by-product of an overstated sense of ego. This “need” can manifest itself in a very literal sense, causing physical and psychological problems if not fulfilled. These are the inherent follies of the creative, they have been around for centuries, but in this regard are simply barriers to overcome. The most difficult thing for a creative to grasp is that a film is not a part of them, an extension of themselves, or inherently valuable.

There are several reasons why your film may need put down. Your film could be problematic to others in its content, easily susceptible to misinterpretation, manipulation, or exploitation by others. It could be problematic to yourself through oversharing personal feelings, easily detectable by an audience through the flimsy veil of cinema by basic analysis or Freudian psychology. In business terms, there could be no money there. There could be no prospects for the project in terms of a festival run due to its lack of contemporary relevance or popularist politics.

Most importantly, and most overlooked, is simply the feeling that it shouldn’t be made. This could be based on thousands of smaller reasons, but regardless a choice has to be made to draw the wakizashi from its sheath and plunge it into ones gut. The simplest reason, or no reason at all, are often the most profound – based on a spiritual or psychic sense of impending doom rather than any logic that could be articulated.

I need to make clear that this is not simply a doubt that comes with the territory of every creative endeavour, but a serious consideration of the value of the film in a larger sense. Making a film is a massive undertaking, even a ten-minute short takes over a thousand man (woman, or non binary person) hours all in all. Upon completion, if anyone involved is disappointed in the final product, I would consider the project a failure.

In my case, as the writer and director, I recognise the value of my pre-production work as a learning experience. I know that I would feel disappointed in the film were it made today, but that doesn’t mean it cannot be made down the line or that my screenwriting skills haven’t improved.

I wanted the political message of my film to shine through, but this interpretation has been missed by most, instead interpreting the film as a scathing portrayal of a horrible town. When the exact same wording in a comment on the film was used twice in this, it clicked, and I realised a significant proportion of the audience would feel this same way. Based partly on elements of my own childhood, which I enjoyed very much, I was deeply disappointed that this was the primary takeaway. When writing I thought that just because bad things happen somewhere, it doesn’t make it a bad place. Untimely drug overdoses happen everywhere, but because it is the subject of my film, it has tarnished the setting beyond reproach. I had a fantastic childhood, and I wanted to portray that through the primary relationship in my film, but I failed. Fundamentally, my film was blackpilled, bookended by drug overdoses and with a morally reprehensible protagonist. The fact that I viewed this as “paying back” my beautiful hometown through returning there for my graduation film project is now comical to me.

All of this came from a gut feeling. I had written a doomercore film with little specificity that needed put down. I load my eighteen gauge shotgun with buckshot, and lead the little guy out the back and press the barrel to the back of its head. I say my tearful goodbyes and regretfully pull the trigger.

Or at least I would have, but it was never alive. I had killed a mirage. This is the key takeaway that I would like readers to recognise. Your film is not alive, your life is worth much more than to spend it loving something that will never love you.

I wrote this short essay under a great deal of stress, which is clear to me upon reflection. I still think the core message is strong. I disagree with the common mindset that you must have an ego or be selfish to get your art made, and think it is a great skill to be able to cancel film projects to make way for greener pastures. There should be eight good ideas you throw out before you get a great one. Despite the reasons listed in my short "essay" there was more thought put into it than that; reasons that were cut for succinctly. My film still did not have the required crew to be greenlit, and meant we were having to source HoD roles from third year. Other production groups had been developing their concept with other HoD's involvement, and due to an our limited crew we did not have an opportunity to do the same, putting us very much behind in creative development. This was a lead I was aware of, and believed we couldn't bridge in the short time period before production commenced without sacrificing the quality of the film. I therefore decided to sacrifice my own film for the good of the course's smooth operation - I am a modern day saint. Jk, of course this was a consideration but a minor one. Regardless, I wrote the essay mainly for a laugh and to make myself feel better; I was clearly overdosing on copium.

I am having a good time hypothesising a comedy drama film right now which I think is more my thing. For every sad film I want to make something that’s a laugh. Making people laugh has basically always been my dream, but I lost it along the way recently. I’m ready to move on from this project as an optimist, and wish my colleagues well in their own grad films this year. It is not over, it’s only just beginning.

[dragynkeep]

I do have my problems with Miraculous Ladybug, but some of those are dampened by the realization that it's very much supposed to be a children's series. And Adrien is the best black cat anyway, so it was funny to watch all the comments from RWBY fans hyping up Blake as the ML fandom quietly voted him to victory.

the fact they had to make their own polls just for blake to "win" is wild as hell, i thought rwby was the most popularist thing of the year we swear guys please don't let us go under! 😭

[lizziestudieshistory]

Someone remind me to write a post about sexism in popularist "feminist" histories... I have a lot of thoughts after reading Borman's book but if I do it now I'll end up ranting about how women are only allowed to exist in history if they're an innocent victim or girlboss.

[gdadfmp24]

Custom Factions: Traits

Traits: Defining characteristics for your faction, with pros and cons. Maximum 2.

•Mutually exclusive

•Popularists: Reduced recruitment cost, but reduced morale and skill. •Extremists: Increased recruitment costs, but increased morale and skill.

•Offworld Sponsor: start with more money and gear than usual, but enemy aggression is 10% more.

•Mutually Exclusive:

•Former military: Start with less troops, but more well-trained troops. •Civil Militia: Start with less-well trained, but more troops.

•Sabotage: Enemy readiness is 15-25% less, but aggression is 10-20% more.

•Deserters: Starts with high quality stolen equipment, but higher enemy aggression.

•Shadowy group: Start with enemy aggression 10-20% lower but less troops.

[noahjobbinsaut]

WEEK 3

Brief history and modern impact:

Helvetica emerged in 1957, when according to Rick Poyner (7:10), their was “a need for rational typefaces, which could be applied to all kinds of information,” Helvetica was the tool these designers needed, and was quickly applied to scientific, political, social, corporate, and other contemporary worlds to present information in a modern way.

According to Jonathon Heefler (29:54), the “mythology” of helvetica being the “ultimate typeface” has been furthered via popularist technology licensing the font and making it endlessly available. Even professionals feel the pull towards believing it to be the ultimate expression of sans-serif, being curated over the past 100 years to create helvetica, even if the thought isn’t historically or socially accurate, due to its feeling of finality.

My opinions:

The film has definitely influenced my opinion of type, while I will continue to struggle with type, I will start to consider the use of more standard fonts, while before I believed the more common fonts to be boring and unable to be expressive, however the film was filled with brilliant examples of how helvetica could be used in lots of diverse ways. This diversity is explained very well by Massimo Vignelli (begins speaking at 3:44) as he explains that "typography is about the white," referencing the spaces between the letters, comparing typography to music, and how it is about the music and not the sounds. He shows how thinner variants of helvetica can convey fancy and calming feelings, while bolder glyphs instead convey feelings of intensity.

I don't plan on using helvetica in all of my designs, at some point I want to try the methods demonstarted by Wim Crouwel (begins speaking 9:20) where he gets a large grid and spreads it over the canvas, helping him create orderly, legible glyphs. He explains that helvetica is the most neutral of fonts, which is part of why we gravitate towards it.

The methods of finding the right font demonstrated by Matthew Carter (13:39) are also interesting, as when exploring or designing a typeface, he begins with the "h", then the "o", then the "p", as this simple set of 3 glyphs demonstate nearly all aspects of typoraphic anatomy, meaning you can quickly determine whether it will work for the usecase you need it for.

I admired the way that Michael C. Place (1:06:00) is able to use helvetica so diversly, I agree with his philosophy of design trying to elicit an emotional response, and I hope to emulate and draw inspiration from his designs.

[socialistworld]

Norwegian Labour-led government behind opposition Conservatives in election race

Norwegian Labour-led government behind opposition Conservatives in election race

All the opinion polls in Norway are predicting huge electoral gains for the Conservative opposition and the right wing ‘Popularists’, and huge losses for the Norwegian Labour party. On the 11th of September 2023, the […]