#Per Sandberg

[laderniereseancedecedrique]

KUNG FURY (2015)

Vu Le : Lundi 27 Janvier 2025

Durée : 31mn02s

Version : VOSTFR

Titre Original : Kung Fury

Interdiction : Tous Publics

Ma Note : 07/10

Le Lien :

La Bande-Annonce :

[sarahelizasims]

SANDBERG ESTELLE STRIPES WALLPAPER 🌼

Stripes are a timeless favourite: vibrant and cheerful, yet orderly and structured. They exude both youthfulness and sophistication. Let Sandberg's Estelle stripes set the tone for the room, or create a unique and charming balance by incorporating other patterns from the collection.

I've been creating a lot of Sandberg-inspired patterns for my rooms recently and wanted to share a few styles with you. Apologies for the delay in releasing these; I know I shared the previews a few weeks ago. Thank you for the encouragement! I'm still working on the other patterns, but they're not quite where I want them to be yet.

Also, take a look at @pixelplayground's newest wallpaper collection. I think her strip pattern is also from Sandberg, I am not 100% sure. Download it anyway because she is 100000000000% better, and look at how CRISP it is.

📌File Features:

8 swatches of 3 different styles of wallpaper with and without trim

Custom thumbnails

$100.00 per square tile

Base game compatible

Ambience Happy under tooltip tags

Found under Paint and Wallpaper

⚠️Term of Use:

Do NOT re-upload and edit my textures or meshes and claim my creations as your own.

Do NOT put my CC behind paywalls.

You MAY include my CC in Sims 4 lot builds, but you must credit me and link directly to the object's post.

You MAY recolor my CC with permission first. Do not include my mesh in your file and do not change my original file! Make sure to also provide links to my original post.

📥DOWNLOAD (Available for FREE on Patreon)

[justforbooks]

Careless People: A Story of Where I Used to Work by Sarah Wynn-Williams

This account of working life at Mark Zuckerberg’s tech giant organisation describes a ‘diabolical cult’ able to swing elections and profit at the expense of the world’s vulnerable

Shortly after her waters broke, Sarah Wynn-Williams was lying in hospital with her feet in stirrups, typing a work memo on her laptop between contractions. Facebook’s director of global public policy needed to send talking points from her recent trip to oversee the tech giant’s bid to launch operations in Myanmar to her boss Sheryl Sandberg. Then she would give birth to her first child.

Wynn-Williams’s husband, a journalist called Tom, was livid but, as men tend to be in labour rooms, impotent. The doctor gently closed her laptop. “Please let me push send,” whimpered Sarah. “You should be pushing,” retorted the doctor with improbable timing. “But not ‘send’.”

This incident typifies how, in this 400-page memoir of her seven years at Facebook from 2011 – as it mutated from niche social network to global power able to swing elections, target body-shamed teens with beauty products and monetise millions of humans’ hitherto private data – Wynn-Williams had become part of what reads like a diabolical cult run by emotionally stunted men babies, institutionally enabled sexual harassers and hypocritical virtue-signalling narcissists.

The cult vibe of this birthing story is made stronger by Wynn-Williams channelling Sandberg’s 2013 book Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. She quotes Sandberg’s injunction to pregnant working women – “Don’t leave before you leave” – taking its implication to be that she should work right up to the point that the baby’s head emerges into this fallen world. It doesn’t occur to her that Lean In feminism might serve as a fig leaf covering self-exploitation and soul-depleting workaholism.

A couple of pages earlier, Wynn-Williams writes like a wide-eyed convert: “It still feels exciting and important to spread this tool around the world and improve people’s lives.” An evidently clever former New Zealand diplomat, she was ideal fodder to help spread Facebook’s secular gospel, as her backstory reveals. After surviving a shark attack as a teenager, she resolved to spend her working life helping humanity. Upon witnessing how the nascent Facebook kept Kiwis connected in the aftermath of the 2011 Christchurch earthquake, she believed that Mark Zuckerberg’s company could make a difference – but in a good way – to social bonds, and that she could be part of that utopian project.

Her naive faith reminds me of what Jon Ronson wrote about in So You’ve Been Publicly Shamed: at their inception both the internet and social media seemed, to some, unalloyed good things. It’s instructive for someone like me – who disdains social media and sees in tech giants the lucrative weaponising of hate masquerading as free speech, and the asphyxiation of democracy by the enabling of post-truth populists – to encounter such cockeyed optimism.

The “tool” Wynn-Williams talks about is not Facebook per se, but Zuckerberg’s cherished internet.org app (which has operated under the name Free Basics since 2015), devised to deliver the internet to connectivity-deprived countries, such as Myanmar, as part of what sounds like a system upgrade of Britain’s oxymoronic imperial mission to civilise black and brown persons.

What internet.org involves for countries that adopt it is a Facebook-controlled monopoly of access to the internet, whereby to get online at all you have to log in to a Facebook account. When the scales fall from Wynn-Williams’s eyes she realises there is nothing morally worthwhile in Zuckerberg’s initiative, nothing empowering to the most deprived of global citizens, but rather his tool involves “delivering a crap version of the internet to two-thirds of the world”.

But Facebook’s impact in the developing world proves worse than crap. In Myanmar, as Wynn-Williams recounts at the end of the book, Facebook facilitated the military junta to post hate speech, thereby fomenting sexual violence and attempted genocide of the country’s Muslim minority. “Myanmar,” she writes with a lapsed believer’s rue, “would have been a better place if Facebook had not arrived.” And what is true of Myanmar, you can’t help but reflect, applies globally.

Before she was disabused, Wynn-Williams fawningly adored Sandberg, as the pair crisscrossed the globe in private jets, bringing the good news of Facebook to foreign leaders. At one point [p40-41], for instance. Wynn-Williams recalls witnessing what happened when Sandberg meets New Zealand prime minister John Key at Facebook’s California headquarters, writing: “Until this moment, it had never occurred to me to see Sheryl as a celebrity or be awestruck by her... But now I can see how she’s sprinkling some of her stardust, whatever that magical quality is that she has that makes you forget to focus on the substance of the meeting at hand and instead wonder what it is she’s doing differently that makes her better than you.”

She approvingly quotes another Lean In message, that you should “bring your authentic self to work”. But what that means in Facebook reality becomes clear when, in her first performance review after giving birth, Wynn-Williams is told that co-workers are uneasy that her baby can be heard on business calls. The poor poppets. “Be smart and hire a Filipina nanny,” counsels Sandberg. Wynn-Williams does just that, but then something shocking happens. One day, Tom is checking the home camera when he notices a firefighter in their living room: the nanny has locked herself out and the baby inside the flat. But when Wynn-Williams later relates this disturbing event to colleagues, she feels as though she has made a faux pas – distracting them from their noble mission with personal guff. “The expectation of Facebook is that mothering is invisible,” she writes. Facebook cannot tolerate too much authenticity.

The book’s title comes from F Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby: “They were careless people, Tom and Daisy – they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness.” For Wynn-Williams, Zuckerberg’s “move fast and break things” philosophy is just such entitled carelessness, leaving Facebook staff and their customers to sweep up the wreckage. But the Facebook she describes is not run by careless people, not really, but rather by wittingly amoral ones who use technical genius and business acumen to profit from human vulnerability. For instance, she claims Facebook – now Meta, which owns Instagram and WhatsApp – identified teenage girls who had deleted selfies on its platforms, and then supplied the data to companies to target them with ads for putatively tummy-flattening teas or beauty products.

Wynn-Williams’s shtick, often presenting herself as the only conscience in the room, does wear thin. I tired of reading of how shocked she was at some Facebook policy, while continuing to spread its values worldwide. “I’m astounded at the role money plays in elections in the US,” she writes at one point, as the 2016 Trump campaign gears up with political ads and targeted misinformation from which Facebook massively profited. Are you really so naive? I wrote in the margin. “I’m also against exporting this value system. But Facebook is effectively bringing this in globally by stealth.” And you’re part of it! I wrote in the margin. If only she’d taken to heart the critical messages of, say, David Fincher’s movie The Social Network or Dave Eggers’s novel The Circle, she might have leaned out earlier.

And yet her memoir is valuable, not just as indictment of the Facebook cult but of bosses’ entitled behaviour that will resonate for many. She depicts Zuckerberg as a tech-bro Henry VIII, a thin-skinned angry child whose courtiers let win at the board game Settlers of Catan during flights on his private jet. She charges him with lying to Congress about the extent of Facebook’s compromises to woo China and allow it to operate there, suggesting that his company was developing technology and tools to meet Chinese requirements that would allow it to censor users’ content and access their data. He was, she claims, much more in cahoots with Xi Jinping’s authoritarian regime than he let on to US senators.

On another private jet, relates Wynn-Williams, Sandberg imperiously invited her to sleep in the same bed. Wynn-Williams declined, but thereafter worried that she had upset her boss by not yielding to a presumably sexual demand, which she depicts in the book as the ex-Facebook COO’s entitled modus operandi with several women subordinates.

And then there’s what Joel Kaplan, currently Meta’s chief global affairs officer, allegedly did to Wynn-Williams at a boozy corporate shindig in 2017. She claimed that he called her “sultry” and rubbed his body against hers on the dancefloor. This wasn’t a one-off incident, she claims: indeed, there was a group at Facebook called Feminist Fight Club, whose members compared notes on such reportedly prevalent cases of sexual harassment by execs. An internal investigation cleared Kaplan of impropriety and soon after Wynn-Williams was fired for making misleading harassment allegations.

Last week, Meta responded to this book, calling it “a mix of out-of-date and previously reported claims about the company and false accusations about our executives”. The company has denounced its former employee, claiming that she was not a whistleblower but a disgruntled activist trying to sell books. Most likely she is both.

Wynn-Williams notes that Facebook changed its name to Meta in 2021. “But leopards don’t change their spots. The DNA of the company remains the same. And the more power they grab, the less responsible they become.” That culture of irresponsibility and carelessness should worry us more than ever, she suggests at the end of the book, as Zuckerberg’s Meta is at the forefront of artificial intelligence, a technology even more potentially calamitous than the one he dreamed up in his Harvard dorm a couple of decades ago.

Daily inspiration. Discover more photos at Just for Books…?

[curiositasmundi]

Channel 13, un canale tv israeliano, venerdì ha annullato la messa in onda di una puntata del programma Makor (“La Fonte”) che rivelava un fatto clamoroso: secondo un rapporto investigativo, Rami Davidian, l’uomo che anche i giornaloni italiani presentarono come un eroe (Repubblica: “Il nonno israeliano che il 7 ottobre ha salvato centinaia di vite”, t.ly/DKUXj), non sarebbe che un volgare impostore, e la sua storia inventata. Raviv Drucker, il conduttore del programma, spiega su X: “Il Ceo di Channel 13, Emiliano Kalamzuk, ci ha comunicato di aver deciso di non trasmettere il servizio su Rami Davidian. Gli ho detto che sarebbe stato un grave errore. Gli ho spiegato di cosa parlava il servizio, cosa mostrava, qual era il suo valore pubblico. Gli ho chiesto di guardarlo prima di prendere una decisione. Un’ora dopo mi ha scritto che la puntata non sarebbe stata trasmessa e che la sua decisione era definitiva; due minuti dopo è stata rilasciata una dichiarazione ai media. Abbiamo preparato il servizio su Davidian con molta sensibilità verso tutti gli aspetti della vicenda: il materiale raccolto è così potente che è importante diffonderlo. Perch�� abbiamo realizzato il servizio? Innanzitutto perché quelle di Davidian sono storie inventate dall’inizio alla fine. Storie orripilanti che non sono mai accadute. Alcune sono state citate in un film famoso (il vergognoso documentario di Sheryl Sandberg Screams Before Silence, già sbugiardato un anno fa qui: t.ly/prfJl), sui giornali di tutto il mondo, in un libro importante. Nell’anno e mezzo trascorso dagli attacchi del 7 ottobre, Davidian ha trasformato le sue storie in un’industria: innumerevoli conferenze pagate, in Israele e all’estero (venne anche a Milano: t.ly/yPL9F); campagne di raccolta fondi, apparentemente per sé, ma lui nega; decine di interviste con i media, in cui ripeteva storie che semplicemente non sono mai esistite”. Il promo ha suscitato proteste in Israele: si “diffamava” un “eroe nazionale”. Così, nonostante la disapprovazione di Drucker, Channel 13 ha deciso di annullare la messa in onda del servizio, prevista per domenica. Commenta Drucker: “Si possono trasmettere decine di apparizioni pubbliche di Davidian contenenti bugie, tra cui calunnie contro alcuni soccorritori del 7 ottobre, ma non 50 minuti di indagine rigorosa e veritiera? I giornalisti che si sono schierati contro la trasmissione hanno paura di imbattersi in domande su come avessero dato spazio a quelle bugie, alcune delle quali possono essere confutate con poco sforzo?”. Ingenuo: non viviamo forse nella stessa realtà in cui Israele può mentire spudoratamente sull’assassinio di 15 operatori sanitari della Mezzaluna Rossa (“Abbiamo attaccato alcuni veicoli non identificati mentre si avvicinavano in modo sospetto senza luci o segnali di emergenza ai soldati, che hanno risposto sparando”), tanto anche se il New York Times mostra il video che sbugiarda l’ennesima menzogna sionista non succede niente? Un anno fa pure Cochav Elkayam-Levy, una funzionaria israeliana insignita del Premio Israele dopo aver spacciato la bufala degli “stupri di massa di Hamas”, fu accusata di aver truffato milioni di dollari versati da donatori alla sua “Commissione Civica” (composta solo da lei) e di aver diffuso falsità (t.ly/K5Pvn, t.ly/JwGkG). Insomma balle, balle, balle. Del resto, a quante cose sbagliate ci hanno fatto credere, da quando siamo al mondo?

Il “nonno eroe israeliano” è una bufala, ma in tv non si potrà guardare - D.Luttazzi

[heihallohadet]

@ghostcat3000 Fingers crossed that your next year will be far less plagued by health issues🤍

The cat looks a bit disgruntled but there is a lot of humor behind Marthe Karen Kampen’s charming painting (“Per Sandberg”, 2019).

[francescacammisa1]

A volte amiamo anche se ci rimane solo un filo di speranza. A volte piangiamo senza lacrime, ma con tutto il nostro essere. In fondo è tutto qui: l’amore e i suoi obblighi, il dolore e la sua verità. Non ci è concesso altro. Possiamo solo cercare di resistere fino all’alba di uno nuovo giorno.

Gregory David Roberts – Shantaram

Ph Johan Sandberg 

[awardseasonblog]

(via Oscar 2025 Miglior film internazionale: la Norvegia seleziona Armand)

Armand, l'acclamata opera prima di Halfdan Ullmann Tøndel,nipote d’arte di Liv Ullmann e Ingmar Bergman, è stato designato dalla Norvegia come rappresentante nazionale per gli Oscar 2025 nella categoria Miglior Film Internazionale.

Il film, che decostruisce i canoni del dramma sociale borghese,ha conquistato la Caméra d'Or nella sezione Un Certain Regard dell'ultimo Festival di Cannes.

 Nella storia degli Oscar la Norvegia è stata nominata 6 volte: Nove vite di Arne Skouen (1958), L’arciere di ghiaccio di Nils Gaup (1988), Gli angeli della domenica di Berit Nesheim (1997), Elling di Petter Næss  (2002), Kon-Tiki di Joachim Rønning e Espen Sandberg (2013), La persona peggiore del mondo (2022) senza però mai riuscire a conquistare la statuetta. 

[abr]

Ogni giorno, ciascuno di noi decide quanta parte del suo lavoro, della sua socialità, dei suoi sentimenti vuole condividere online, quanta parte di sé vuole mettere in mostra.

L’ascesa dell’autopromozione sui social media ha fatto sì che oggi, per le persone, costruire un personal brand sia una sorta di seconda natura. (...) Promuovere se stessi e il proprio lavoro è diventato tanto importante quanto saper fare il proprio lavoro. Avere un seguito è diventato il paradossale prerequisito per crearsi un seguito. (...)

Che cosa c’è di male? (...) Sheryl Sandberg, ex responsabile operativo di Meta e per lungo tempo braccio destro di Mark Zuckerberg,(...) ha spiegato: “Perrier è un brand. Crest è un brand. Le persone non sono così lineari. Quando ci impacchettiamo, diventiamo inefficaci e inautentici. Il mio consiglio è: non impacchettatevi”.

(L)a situazione (potrebbe sfuggire) di mano: (per) costruire il loro brand personale, le persone devono essere ‘always on’, aggiornando il profilo social più volte al giorno con dei contenuti attentamente curati e che vadano incontro ai gusti delle persone con cui vogliono socializzare o lavorare (...) . Ciò introduce una forma di costante automonitoraggio. Costringe a essere molto strumentali nei confronti della propria vita personale. (...) È assodato come la necessità di essere “always on” (...) sia direttamente collegata al drammatico aumento dei casi di burnout, (...) uno stress cronico non gestito, mostrandoci sempre performativi, sempre sul pezzo (...) mentre nella realtà siamo vittime di ansia, depressione (...).

via https://www.iltascabile.com/scienze/personal-branding/

Evidenziano un tema interessante e attualissimo, bravi, ma questi de IlTascabile lo banalizzano: questa sarebbe una mera degenerazione "neolibberista" (??!!??) dovuta al fatto che là fuori so' tutti freelance. La loro soluzione qual è? Postofisso shtatale pe'tutti ? Il reddito di cittadinanza?

In realtà confondono effetti con cause: "tutti freelance" è un effetto non la causa della cd. FLUIDITA' contemporanea, molto promossa dai benecomunisti (che pur relativisti non sono affatto ma gli fa gioco esserlo: puro inganno tipo taqiyyah islamica, per svellere i pochi punti fermi Occidentali rimasti). E confondono malesseri e scuse con sindromi vere: ma quale snowflake burnout, viviamo in un mondo dove la realtà non esiste più, soppiantata da milioni di Truman Show volontari.

Vale per i ggiovani irrequieti e poco stabili (come da sempre, anche quando FLUIDITA' era sinonimo di narcisismo da IMMATURITA'), vale con fatica anche per i menogiovani hipster che invecchiare non vorrebbero ... quindi non maturano.

Una volta eran casalinghe, oggi fanno le chef virtuali; un tempo promotrici Amway, oggi fanno le influencer di cremine.Ma quali freelance, si autopromuovono tutti, anche gli artigiani, anche chi ha contratto a tempo indeterminato, cfr. LinkedIn. Tutti follower: i veri leader non pubblicano mai granché di se stessi e della loro vita vera, hanno chi fa la NARRATIVA per loro, si fanno seguire non seguono.

[fashionbooksmilano]

Annie Leibovitz Ritratti 2005-2016

Editor Sharon DeLano

Progetto Grafico Jeff Streeper

White Star, Milano 2017, 313 pagine, 28x37 cm, ISBN 978-8854036154

euro 75,00

email if you want to buy :booksinprogressmilano@yahoo.it

Annie Leibovitz è una delle fotografe più influenti del nostro tempo e la sua carriera si snoda su quasi cinque decenni, a partire dagli anni ’70 quando si è dedicata a immortalare il mondo del rock-and-roll. Per questa nuova raccolta Annie Leibovitz ha selezionato 150 ritratti di figure celebri e di grande influenza sulla scena mondiale. Le sue immagini documentano la cultura contemporanea attraverso l'occhio e l'intuizione dell'artista, facendo leva su una sorprendente capacità di mettere a nudo i tratti più intimi anche di personaggi la cui notorietà sembrerebbe aver già svelato ogni segreto.

One of the most influential photographers of our time, Annie Leibovitz has a career spanning nearly five decades, starting in the 1970s when she was a widely acclaimed photographer at Rolling Stone. At Vanity Fair and Vogue and in independent projects, Leibovitz expanded her repertoire as a portraitist with a distinctive style. Her many honuors include being designated a Living Legend by the Library of Congress, and her work is exhibited at museums around the world. There are over 150 subjects in Portraits 2005-2016, including Venus and Serena Williams, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, LeBron James, Sheryl Sandberg, Anna Wintour, Leonard Cohen, Jasper Johns, Caitlyn Jenner, Gloria Steinem, Joan Didion, Barack Obama, and Queen Elizabeth II.

20/07/23

orders to:     booksinprogressmilano@yahoo.it

ordini a:        booksinprogressmilano@yahoo.it

twitter:@fashionbooksmi

instagram:         fashionbooksmilano

                         designbooksmilano

tumblr:               fashionbooksmilano

                         designbooksmilano

[mrs-storm-andrews]

23 Books in 2023

I was tagged by @duchess-of-tales to name 23 books I've read in 2023. Have to admit that I haven't actually read any of these, but listened to them as audio books instead. So, here are 23 audio books I've listened to in 2023 (in chronological order):

Helen Fields: Perfect Remains (all 5 books of the series)

Astrid Fitz: Der dunkle Himmel

Ellen Sandberg: Die Schweigende

Ezekiel Boone: The Hatching

Las Kepler: The Hypnotist (8 of 9 books of the series)

Charlotte Link: Haus der Schwestern

Tana French: The Secret Place

Philipp P. Peterson: Vakuum

Stephen King: 11/22/63

Andy Weir: The Martian

Max Brooks: World War Z

Nathan Hill: The Nix

Lothar-Günther Buchheim: Das Boot

Dan Simmons: The Terror

Allen Eskens: The Life We Bury

Primo Levi: If This Is a Man

Robert Harris: Fatherland

Eva Garcia Saenz: The Silence of the White City (all 3 books of the series)

John Grisham: The Racketeer

Frederick Forsyth: The Odessa File

Andreas Gruber: Das Eulentor

Steve Cavanagh: The Defense (4 of 6 books of the series)

Donna Tartt: The Secret History

I've listened to at least twice as many audio books than listed here. Probably about 2 per week. I'm an audio book addict, hands down.

Well, I'd like to tag @cafeleningrad, @jessthebooklover (for obvious name reasons), @bloody-wonder and @myrxellabaratheon for this one.

[theculturedmarxist]

It's fun to clown on Musk, but in this case he's actually right.

Whether or not risk of myocarditis is greater as a result of contracting covid is irrelevant to whether or not it is also a risk of taking the vaccine. In fact, knowledge of that risk is vital to having the informed consent necessary to administering that vaccine, especially now when it seems to be the case that there is a compounding risk of myocarditis from repeated covid boosters.

And when the current expectation is that people are going to a) get multiple boosters per year and b) get multiple infections per year, every year, for the foreseeable future, yeah, that's an important consideration.

And I remember that when the vaccines first came out that any and all mention of adverse side effects, including the possibility of myocarditis or adverse effect on menstruation, were called misinformation and anti-vaxxer nonsense or conspiracy theories, all because the Biden administration wanted to get as many people vaccinated as possible as quickly as possible in order to force people to "return to normal."

The most embarrassing revelation of the “Facebook Files” released by House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan yesterday (described in more detail here) involves the news media:

In one damning email, an unnamed Facebook executive wrote to Mark Zuckerberg and Cheryl Sandberg:

We are facing continued pressure from external stakeholders, including the White House and the press, to remove more Covid-19 vaccine discouraging content.

We see repeatedly in internal communications not only in the email above, but in the Twitter Files, in the exhibits of the Missouri v Biden lawsuit, and even in the Freedom of Information request results beginning to trickle in here at Racket, that the news media has for some time been working in concert with civil society organizations, government, and tech platforms, as part of the censorship apparatus.

In the summer of 2021, the White House and Joe Biden were in the middle of a major factual faceplant. They were not only telling people the Covid-19 vaccine was a sure bet — “You’re not going to get Covid if you have these vaccinations” is how Biden put it — but that those who questioned its efficacy were “killing people.” But the shot didn’t work as advertised. It didn’t prevent contraction or transmission, something Biden himself continued to be wrong about as late as December of that year.

If you go back and give a careful read to corporate media content from that time describing the administration’s war against “disinformation,” you’ll see outlets were themselves not confident the vaccine worked. Take the New York Times effort from July 16th, 2021, “They’re Killing People: Biden Denounces Social Media for Virus Disinformation.” You can see the Times tiptoeing around what they meant, when they used the word “disinformation.” In this and other pieces they used phrases like, “the spread of anti-vaccine misinformation,” “how to track misinformation,” “the prevalence of misinformation,” even “Biden’s forceful statement capped weeks of anger in the White House over the dissemination of vaccine disinformation,” but they repeatedly hesitated to say what the misinformation was.

Any editor will tell you this language is a giveaway. Journalists wrote expansively about “disinformation,” but rarely got into specifics. They knew that they couldn’t state with certainty that the vaccine worked, that there weren’t side effects, etc., yet still denounced people who asked those questions. This is because they agreed with the concept of “malinformation,” i.e. there are things that may be true factually, but which may produce political results considered adverse. “Hestiancy” was one such bugbear. Note the language from the unnamed Facebook executive above, which describes the press lashing out “Covid-19 vaccine discouraging content,” not “disinformation.”

This is total corruption of the news. We’re supposed to be in the business of questioning officials, even if the questions are unpopular. That’s our entire role! If we don’t do that, we serve no purpose, maybe even a negative purpose. Moreover, think of the implications. News outlets wail about “disinformation” when they’re aware the public has tuned them out. When people don’t listen to reporters, it’s usually because they suck. You can do the math, as to why the current crop embraces censorship. A more embarrassing outcome for our business would be hard to imagine.

[thegoregoregirls]

Until Dawn

Regia – David F. Sandberg (2025) Il problema di molte persone è che non sanno più divertirsi. Anzi, un po’ si vergognano se capita loro, per un caso fortuito, di divertirsi. Di conseguenza non ammetterebbero neanche sotto tortura di essersi divertiti. Poi c’è tutta la genia a parte dei videogiocatori, ma di quei figuri in questa sede non parleremo perché li lasciamo a scannarsi su Twitter mentre…

[gplayr]

Till Daybreak Film Will Launch on April 25, 2025 Sony and Ballistic Moon’s remake of Till Daybreak has failed to draw a lot of an viewers on each PS5 and PC, however the horror sport will quickly be getting one other probability to shine, and in a... https://blog.gplayr.com/until-dawn-movie-will-release-on-april-25-2025/

[dipfearworld]

LIGHTS OUT

David F. Sandberg, 2016, per articolare un’idea terrificante: LIGHTS OUT ANNO 2016 GENERE 👻PARANORMAL DURATA 1:21′ REGISTA DAVID F. SANDBERG TRAMA Rebecca, sin da bambina, non è mai stata sicura di cosa fosse reale quando si spegnevano le luci. Ora suo fratello più piccolo, Martin, sta vivendo gli stessi eventi terrificanti che in passato avevano messo a dura prova la sua salute…

[drclaudiosaracinodcsworld]

PRODUTTIVITÀ E IPNOSI? Ipnosi DCS unica al mondo

🌀💼 Se desideri aumentare la tua produttività e ottenere risultati straordinari nella tua vita professionale, l'ipnosi vera e professionale potrebbe essere la chiave per sbloccare il tuo pieno potenziale!

Grazie alla sua capacità di migliorare la concentrazione, la motivazione e la gestione dello stress, l'ipnosi sta aiutando sempre più persone in tutto il mondo a raggiungere livelli di produttività mai immaginati. 🚀

Numerosi personaggi famosi hanno pubblicamente testimoniato i benefici dell'ipnosi nel migliorare la produttività e il successo professionale.

Ecco le dichiarazioni di 10 celebrità che hanno trovato ispirazione e motivazione grazie all'ipnosi:

1️⃣ Elon Musk: "L'ipnosi mi ha aiutato a concentrarmi sulle mie priorità e a mantenere alta la mia performance lavorativa."

2️⃣ Beyoncé: "Dopo aver sperimentato l'ipnosi, ho notato un aumento significativo della mia creatività e della mia produttività."

3️⃣ Barack Obama: "Grazie all'ipnosi, ho imparato a gestire lo stress e a mantenere la calma anche nelle situazioni più impegnative."

4️⃣ Serena Williams: "L'ipnosi mi ha aiutato a visualizzare il successo e a raggiungere nuovi traguardi nella mia carriera sportiva."

5️⃣ Jeff Bezos: "L'ipnosi ha giocato un ruolo fondamentale nel mio percorso imprenditoriale, aiutandomi a mantenere la concentrazione e la determinazione."

6️⃣ Oprah Winfrey: "Dopo aver provato l'ipnosi, ho notato un netto miglioramento nella mia produttività e nella mia capacità di gestire le sfide quotidiane."

7️⃣ Cristiano Ronaldo: "L'ipnosi ha contribuito ad aumentare la mia resilienza e la mia determinazione, permettendomi di raggiungere livelli di eccellenza nel mio sport."

8️⃣ Sheryl Sandberg: "L'ipnosi mi ha insegnato a superare i momenti di stallo e a mantenere alta la mia produttività nel mondo degli affari."

9️⃣ Will Smith: "Grazie all'ipnosi, ho imparato a eliminare le distrazioni e a concentrarmi sulle mie priorità, ottenendo così risultati straordinari."

🔟 Victoria Beckham: "L'ipnosi mi ha aiutato a superare i blocchi mentali e a trovare l'ispirazione necessaria per crescere nel mondo della moda e del design."

Se anche tu desideri massimizzare la tua produttività e raggiungere nuovi livelli di successo nella tua carriera, considera l'ipnosi come un alleato prezioso nel tuo percorso professionale.

Consulta un ipnoterapeuta esperto e inizia a sbloccare il tuo pieno potenziale! 💼🌟

Se non hai tempo per girare cappelle, scarica audio DCS unico al mondo dal titolo:

SUPER PRODUTTIVITÀ

https://claudiosaracino.com/prodotto/super-produttivita-super-azione-metodo-dcs/

#ipnosi #produttività #successo #motivazione #celebrità