#Needham Roberts
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Men of the Harlem Hellfighters (369th Infantry), some of whom had been awarded the Croix de Guerre by France for their courage under fire, on June 11, 1918.
Record Group 165: Records of the War Department General and Special Staffs
Series: American Unofficial Collection of World War I Photographs
File Unit: Colored Troops
Image description: A line of Black soldiers standing shoulder to shoulder in a grassy field. They are wearing World War I U.S. Army uniforms and narrow metal helmets.
Transcription:
SUBJECT: 165-WW-127-4 NUMBER EU
165 WW-127 4
Inter. Film Ser. Photographer
Rec'd June 11, 1916 Taken
DESCRIPTION:
NEGRO TROOPS IN FRANCE.
Picture shows a part of the 15th Regt. Inf. N.Y.N.G organized by Col. Haywood, which has been under fire. Two of the men Privates Johnson and Roberts, displayed exceptional courage while under fire and routed a German Raiding party for which the negroes were decorated with the French Croix de Guerre. it will be noticed that the men have taken to the French trench helmet instead of the flatter and broader British style.
#archivesgov#June 11#1918#1910s#World War I#WWI#military#U.S. Army#Black history#African American history#Harlem Hellfighters#369th Infantry#15th New York National Guard#Henry Johnson#Henry “Black Death” Johnson#Needham Roberts#who lied about his age to enlist and was seventeen at this time
157 notes
·
View notes
Text
Pictures: National Gaurd Bureau & African American Registry
youtube
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
The grenade
The grenade (grenade is likely derived from the French word spelled exactly the same, meaning pomegranate, as the bomb is reminiscent of the many-seeded fruit in size and shape. Its first use in English dates from the 1590s.) as we know it today is not a modern invention - on the contrary, it has its origins in late antiquity and the early Middle Ages.
First grenades appeared in the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire not long after the reign of Leo III (717-741). Byzantine soldiers learnt that Greek fire (a mixture of sulphur and oil), a Byzantine invention from the previous century, could be thrown at the enemy not only with flamethrowers but also in stone and ceramic vessels.
Byzantine " Greek Fire" Grenade, c. 800-1000 AD
With the invention of gunpowder in Song China (960-1279), weapons known as ‘thunderbolts’ were created by soldiers packing gunpowder into ceramic or metal vessels with fuses. In a military book from the year 1044, the Wujing Zongyao (Collection of Military Classics), various gunpowder recipes are described in which, according to Joseph Needham, the prototype of the modern hand grenade can be found.
The grenades (pào) are made of cast iron, are the size of a bowl and have the shape of a ball. They contain half a pound of ‘divine fire’ (shén huǒ, gunpowder) inside. They are sent by an eruptor (mu pào) towards the enemy camp, and when they arrive there, a sound like a thunderclap is heard and flashes of light appear. If ten of these grenades are successfully fired at the enemy camp, the whole place goes up in flames.
Grenade-like devices were also known in ancient India. In a Persian historical account from the 12th century, the Mojmal al-Tawarikh, a terracotta elephant filled with explosives was hidden in a chariot with a fuse and exploded as the invading army approached.
These encrusted hand grenades were washed up from a 17th-century pirate shipwreck, Dollar Cove, in the coastal Gunwalloe district of Cornwall's Lizard Peninsula
The first cast-iron bombs and shells appeared in Europe in 1467, where they were initially used in the siege and defence of castles and fortresses. In the mid-17th century, infantrymen known as ‘grenadiers’ emerged in European armies, specialising in shock and close combat, usually using grenades and engaging in fierce hand-to-hand combat. But grenades have also been in use at sea since the 17th century. They were used to inflict as much personal damage as possible below deck after boarding a ship by throwing the grenades underneath.
After the middle of the 19th century, grenades were used extensively in the Crimean War and the American Civil War. Before they changed in design and function to be used in the trenches, especially in the First World War and later. They are still in use today.
Forbes, Robert James (1993). Studies in Ancient Technology
Thomas Enke: Grundlagen der Waffen- und Munitionstechnik
David Harding (Hrsg.): Waffen-Enzyklopädie
Bertram Kropak: Die geschichtliche Entwicklung der Handgranaten. In: DWJ Deutsches Waffen Journal. 1970
#naval artifacts#naval weapons#grenade#ancient seafaring#medieval seafaring#age of sail#age of steam#today#naval history
123 notes
·
View notes
Photo
1918 Sergeant William “Black Death” Johnson of New York City’s celebrated Harlem Hellfighters. Johnson wears the Croix de Guerre, which he earned for receiving twenty-one wounds while fighting off an Imperial German Army raiding party, in order to save fellow soldier Private Needham Roberts. From New York City-Vintage History, FB.
679 notes
·
View notes
Text
Henry "Black Death" Johnson served as a member of Company C, 369th Infantry Regiment, 93rd Division, American Expeditionary Forces (The Harlem Hellfighters), during combat operations against the enemy on the front lines of the Western Front in France.
While on night sentry duty, May 15, 1918, Johnson and a fellow Soldier, Pvt. Needham Roberts, received a surprise attack by a German raiding party consisting of at least 12 soldiers.
While under intense enemy fire and despite receiving significant wounds, Johnson mounted a brave retaliation resulting in several enemy casualties. When Roberts was badly wounded, Johnson prevented him from being taken prisoner by German forces.
After his rifle jammed, Johnson exposed himself to grave danger by advancing from his position to engage an enemy soldier in hand-to-hand combat. Wielding only a knife and being seriously wounded, Johnson continued fighting, took his Bolo knife and stabbed it through an enemy soldier's head.
Displaying great courage, the 5ft 4in Johnson held back the enemy force until they retreated. The enemy raid's failure to secure prisoners was due to the bravery and resistance of Johnson and his fellow comrade. The effect of their fierce fighting resulted in the increased vigilance and confidence of the 369th Infantry Regiment.
32 notes
·
View notes
Text
Lisa Needham at Public Notice:
It finally happened. Judge Aileen Cannon, who has been telegraphing for months that she was committed to finding a way to get Trump off the hook in his classified documents case, came through for her guy. In a sprawling 93-page opinion, Cannon threw out the charges against the former president, agreeing with Trump that Special Counsel Jack Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional. Since Trump stuffed the federal judiciary full of Federalist Society true believers, those courts are nothing but Calvinball. There are no longer any fixed rules and precedent doesn’t matter. What does matter to judges like Cannon is ensuring that a hard-right evangelical worldview becomes the rule of law in America and that Donald Trump is preserved at all costs.
Cannon’s opinion is a joke
There’s little to no legal support for Cannon’s decision. In short, her ruling turns on the assertion that a special counsel is a “principal,” not an “inferior” officer. The former are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate — basically the same as cabinet appointments. Inferior officers generally have the same confirmation requirements unless Congress has authorized a head of a cabinet department to make the appointment. In that instance, Senate confirmation isn’t necessary. The notion that the head of the Department of Justice can appoint special counsels as needed has been settled since the Watergate era. Indeed, if Senate confirmation were always required, special counsel appointments would become nearly impossible, as the Senate is basically non-functional thanks to the filibuster. Additionally, under Cannon’s view, if the Senate is held by the party in opposition to the current occupant of the White House, they essentially get a veto over every special counsel nomination.
The argument that special counsel appointments are unconstitutional if it makes Republicans sad has been pushed by conservative litigants who wanted to block Robert Mueller from investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election. As Quinta Jurecic noted at Lawfare, when the DC Circuit issued its appellate opinion in 2019, four other federal courts had already considered the matter, agreeing that the special counsel’s appointment was proper. The architect of this anti-special counsel argument is Stephen Calebresi, one of the founders of the Federalist Society. Calebresi has shopped it around quite a bit, with major law review articles in 2018 and 2019 arguing Mueller’s appointment was improper and an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in Trump’s presidential immunity case. Recall that Cannon’s decision to entertain the Trump appointments clause argument led to an extremely odd hearing where Cannon allowed amici — outside third parties like Calebresi — to present arguments in favor of Trump’s position. That’s a highly unusual step and telegraphed either that Cannon didn’t know what she was doing, was deliberately to bolster her inevitable decision in favor of Trump, or both.
[...] Not content to deal with the case at hand, Cannon also decided she should go back to the 1980s and retroactively declare that the appointment of Lawrence Walsh, who investigated the Reagan Administration’s role in the Iran-Contra affair, was invalid. So, too, with Robert Mueller’s appointment as special counsel examining Russian interference in the 2016 election. The constitutionality of Mueller’s appointment had already been addressed by a federal appellate court five years ago when the DC Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Mueller’s appointment. However, yesterday’s opinion is very clearly Cannon’s job interview with Trump, and she’s writing this for an audience of precisely on person, so why not throw Trump some red meat about Mueller as well? Having disposed of decades of special counsel law, Cannon wasn’t left with much in the way of precedent. Perhaps that’s why she had to lean hard on Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurrence in the presidential immunity case to reach her preferred conclusion.
[...] Special counsel Jack Smith has already indicated that the DOJ will be appealing the dismissal to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Recall that the Eleventh Circuit overturned Cannon's previous ruling in this matter. Cannon granted Trump’s request that a special master review all the classified material Trump absconded with, which dragged the case to a halt. The Eleventh Circuit was not happy with this, saying, “We cannot write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant. Nor can we write a rule that allows only former presidents to do so.” And this is the core of the problem: People like Aileen Cannon are perfectly happy with a rule that only applies to Donald Trump. Indeed, Cannon’s order already states that “the effect of this Order is confined to this proceeding.” Those of us who lived through the 2000 Bush-Gore recount case will recall that the Supreme Court tried to create a similar firewall between their bad and self-serving ruling and the possibility it might ever be used against Republicans instead of just Democrats. In Bush v. Gore, when handing the presidency to George W. Bush, the Court wrote that “our consideration is limited to the present circumstances, for the problem of equal protection in election processes generally presents many complexities.” See? Calvinball. The giveaway of the presidency to George W. Bush only applies to George W. Bush. The destruction of the special counsel process only applies to Donald Trump. If Republicans need either of these issues to go the other way in a court of law, they just have to point to Cannon’s language limiting it to this instance only. Cannon’s timing, whether a product of her overall incompetence or a deliberate choice, is exceedingly favorable for Trump. Even if Smith prevails in the Eleventh Circuit, Trump could petition his pet Supreme Court justices to review the case. No matter what, the case is DOA before the election. The process of an appeal, the result of which would ultimately only be to send the case back down for trial, will drag long past the election.
Trump-appointed judicial activist Aileen Cannon plays Calvinball to justify Donald Trump’s document theft in her United States v. Trump ruling.
#Aileen Cannon#United States v. Trump#Jack Smith#Jack Smith Special Counsel Investigation#Document Theft#Classified Documents#11th Circuit Court
13 notes
·
View notes
Text
Harrenhal is a much more prominent fixture. The fortress itself is said to be haunted, a fact used to blame all sorts of strange occurrences over the years — including the fire Larys Strong (Matthew Needham) started that killed his family in season 1. Whether the curse is real isn't something House of the Dragon will necessarily answer, but Condal and Hess certainly enjoyed playing with that element to further explore Daemon. "There's a haunted goat!" Hess eagerly reveals. So, kind of like Black Phillip from Robert Eggers' 2015 horror hit The Witch? "I mean, a little bit," she says. "We definitely were thinking of it as [The Shining's] Overlook Hotel. It's super fun in that it's atmospheric." Hess also mentions Alys Rivers, a new character this season played by Gayle Rankin (GLOW). Alys served as a wet nurse to many of the babes born at Harrenhal over the years, but like Melisandre from Game of Thrones, she courts the supernatural and no one knows her true age. "Nobody's giving birth to a smoke baby, let's put it that way," Hess clarifies of Alys. All this is meant to bear down on Daemon in the Macbeth-ian sense when he arrives at Harrenhal. "He can't sleep. There's weird shit going on. He's not sure if it's real or if it's in his own head," Hess continues. "We just wanted to have unexplained things and then use that as a conduit to lay him open a little more than he would be in normal life."
Source: https://ew.com/house-of-the-dragon-season-2-emma-darcy-olivia-cooke-cover-story-8646032
#not counting out dream sequence or hallucination for anything we see with daemon in harrenhal during promo and trailers#also i am HERE for spooky haunted af harrenhall ghostie vibes#BRING IT#hotd s2#house of the dragon#daemon targaryen
13 notes
·
View notes
Text
The constitutional standoff between Texas Governor Greg Abbott and the Biden administration over the Texas-Mexico border will "very likely" be decided by the Supreme Court, according to prominent legal experts, with one predicting it could "side with the state in its quest to usurp the federal government's authority."
On January 22 the Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 verdict to overturn an injunction from the Fifth Circuit court that blocked the Biden administration from ordering federal agents to remove razor wire from the Texas-Mexico border, which was placed there to discourage migrants from crossing on the orders of Governor Abbott.
At Abbott's instruction the Texas National Guard also took control of Shelby Park in Eagle Pass, a frequently used migrant arrival point, and refused to allow federal Customs Border and Protection officials access to the site.
Abbott reacted with fury to the Supreme Court judgment, saying he was invoking "Texas's constitutional authority to defend and protect itself." He argued that, under the Constitution, this is "the supreme law of the land and supersedes any federal statutes to the contrary." He received a joint statement from 25 other Republican governors offering "solidarity."
In an article published by politics site Public Notice, which describes its purpose as "explaining what's happening on the American right for a largely progressive audience," attorney Lisa Needham said it is "almost inevitable" that the dispute will come back to the Supreme Court where based on the January 22 ruling "at least four justices already agree with Texas."
Despite the January 22 ruling going against Abbott, she suggested if the Supreme Court decides to examine the case in full it could allow the governor's border controls to remain, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett likely to be the key swing voters.
Needham wrote: "The Supreme Court has already weighed in, but that was only on Texas's request that the federal government be enjoined, on an emergency basis, from cutting the razor wire. No court has yet ruled on the substance of the matter, meaning there has been no complete review of all the facts and law in the case.
"The full case still needs to make its way through the lower courts, and it is almost inevitable that it will then be back up at the Supreme Court again, where it seems that at least four justices already agree with Texas."
She added: "Simply because the Supreme Court vote to vacate the injunction was a 5-4 split in favor of the federal government doesn't mean an ultimate ruling on the case would come out the same.
"Roberts and Barrett may have only believed that Texas was wrong to ask for an emergency injunction, but they could eventually side with the state in its quest to usurp the federal government's authority."
Speaking to Newsweek Neama Rahmani, president of West Coast Trial Lawyers, agreed the issue will "very likely end up before the Supreme Court" as it is "exactly the type of case the justices are meant to resolve."
He argued the justices could end up supporting Texas, despite the Constitution's supremacy clause that gives primacy to federal over state laws, saying: "The previous ruling was limited to whether Texas can prevent Border Patrol agents from removing or cutting the barbed wire. There are potentially bigger issues at play here though, and the conservative justices haven't been shy to craft broad rulings to reverse years of precedent.
"Immigration has historically been exclusively a federal issue, but I wouldn't be surprised if the Supreme Court finds a creative way to allow for state action to enforce our nation's immigration laws notwithstanding the supremacy clause and pre-emption doctrine. Justices Roberts or Barrett are far from locks to support the Biden administration, so all eyes will be on them."
V. James DeSimone, a Los Angeles-based civil rights attorney, accused Texan authorities of "causing death and injury to vulnerable families in the name of protecting property rights" in an interview with Newsweek, adding: "If this isn't a case for the United States Supreme Court to resolve then nothing is."
If this does happen DeSimone said the Biden administration has a "solid legal basis for its position" due to the supremacy clause, adding: "A justice who would change his or her vote to side with Texas in this dispute would be on shaky ground."
If the case reaches the Supreme Court, DeSimone said judges "should side with the Biden administration in this dispute, even if it's a narrow majority of justices." He added: "The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals gave short shrift to the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution when it sided with Texas. Instead, the appeals court said the principle of sovereign immunity provided no justification for the Border Patrol to cut down razor wire that had been installed by the Texas National Guard."
DeSimone argued Supreme Court justices likely considered the supremacy clause in their judgment of January 22, suggesting it would be a big call for them to reverse course if they end up ruling on the case again.
Needham concluded her article by arguing the dispute is now a win-win for Abbott, commenting: "Either way, Abbott gets what he wants.
"He now has the full-throated support of conservative elected officials who don't believe the federal government should have any authority if Democrats are in power, and he has private citizens willing to show the same eager violence as those who supported Trump's insurrection. There's just no way in which this ends well."
Newsweek contacted Abbott's office by telephone, voicemail and online contact form at 5:50 a.m. ET on Wednesday. This article will be updated if they wish to provide a comment.
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
By: Julian Adorney, Mark Johnson and Geoff Laughton
Published: Jun 29, 2024
American communities have been systematically hollowed out over the past 50 years. In Bowling Alone, Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam makes an exhaustively-researched case that confirms what most people who lived through this period already know: community life is on the decline. For most of the first two centuries of American history, people were enmeshed in a dense web of civic associations. We bowled together, attended church, participated in Rotary Club meetings, and volunteered for local political groups together. We played bridge with our neighbors and gathered for regular book clubs.
This vibrant communal engagement fostered a deep-seated trust among neighbors. In 1964, a remarkable 77 percent of Americans agreed with the statement, “most people can be trusted.” But starting in the 1970s, the fabric of American society began to unravel. The strong community bonds that once unified us began to fray, one by one; and our social capital (Putnam’s term for the “connections among individuals—social networks and the norms of reciprocity and trustworthiness that arise from them”) has decreased dramatically.
For instance, Putnam notes that while the total number of national nonprofit associations more than doubled from 1968 to 1997, the average membership per association plummeted—from roughly 10,000 in 1962 to around 1,000 in 1988. This translates to an almost 80 percent decrease in the number of Americans involved with national nonprofits over three decades. Additionally, Putnam cites time diaries showing that in 1965, Americans spent an average of 3.7 hours per month in non-religious organizational activities, such as Key clubs, Rotary clubs, bowling leagues, and others. By 1995, that number had fallen to 2.3 hours per month.
It’s not just organizational ties that are being frayed; we’re spending less time with friends too. As Putnam notes, “In the mid-to late 1970s, according to the DDB Needham Life Style archive, the average American entertained friends at home about fourteen to fifteen times a year. By the late 1990s that figure had fallen to eight times per year, a decline of 45 percent in barely two decades.”
Since the publication of Bowling Alone in 2000, the societal disengagement Putnam described has gotten worse. The rise of social media and streaming services like Netflix are keeping us increasingly alone in our rooms, plugged in but disengaged from meaningful interaction with our fellow humans. A 2018 Adobe report focusing on the United Kingdom found that Millennials spend an average of 8.5 hours per day engaging with online content. For Generation Z, that number rises to an astounding 10.6 hours per day. When you account for hours spent sleeping, there is little time left for young people to engage in face-to-face community activities. Indeed, data show that they’re not engaging. In his book The Anxious Generation, social psychologist Jonathan Haidt notes that the percentage of middle- and high-school students who report meeting up with friends “almost every day” outside of school has fallen dramatically since the 1990s—a trend exacerbated by a global pandemic that confined everyone to their homes for two years.
[ Source: https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/research/notes-and-figures ]
What does the decline of community life since the 1970s have to do with rising illiberalism? As social animals, our sense of connection greatly influences our happiness. A study published in The Journal of Socio-Economics highlights just how essential community is for our well-being. This study surveyed 10,000 adults in England, examining the factors that make them happy or unhappy. Surprisingly, money didn’t seem to matter much. According to the authors, “Income only plays a small part in influencing our well-being.” Instead, a sense of community was paramount to participants’ happiness. In particular, having a single close friend was deemed as valuable as an additional $150,000 in yearly income.
In 2021, nearly half of Americans (49 percent) reported having three or fewer close friends, a significant drop from 27 percent in 1990. Maybe that’s why so many Americans are unhappy these days. According to Gallup’s 2024 World Happiness Report, America ranks 23rd in global happiness. An MSNBC report also notes that “Self-reported happiness in the U.S. has been on the decline for the past two decades.” Furthermore, 32.3 percent of American adults—and a stunning 49.9 percent of young people aged 18-24—suffer from anxiety or depression.
Could this widespread dissatisfaction with modern life be causing a shift away from liberalism? Data suggests it might be. A study published in the prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences titled “The rise and fall of rationality in language,” systematically analyzes the relative frequencies of emotional and rational words in massive databases of written language, from Google Books and the New York Times, from 1850 to 2019. Emotional words such as “angry,” “unexpected,” “embarrassed,” and “tortured” are contrasted with rational words like “indicate,” “area,” “program,” and “determine.” The study found that from 1850 to the 1980s, the relative proportion of emotional words consistently decreased, while rational words increased. However, starting in the 1980s, a reversal occurred; our discourse became more emotional and less rational. By 2019, the use of rationality-related words had declined to levels not seen in over a century.
What does this decline in rationality signify? The authors suggest that it might reflect a growing “disillusion with ‘the system.’” As they note, “rationality…helped build and defend the system” in which we all live. Thus, a move away from rationality might reflect our collective anger at the liberal social order that we think is making us lonely and disconnected.
The connection between social isolation and political illiberalism isn’t new; it has been well-established by social psychologists. As Haidt writes in The Righteous Mind, social connectedness serves as a bulwark against totalitarianism.
If people can’t satisfy their need for deep connection in other ways, they’ll be more receptive to a smooth-talking leader who urges them to renounce their lives of “selfish momentary pleasure” and follow him onward to “that purely spiritual existence” in which their value as human beings consists.
In contrast, “a nation that is full of hives [Haidt’s term for civic associations] is a nation of happy and satisfied people. It’s not a very promising target for takeover by a demagogue offering people meaning in exchange for their souls.”
Putnam argues that social isolation may fuel political extremism for a different but related reason: it puts us into echo chambers, which moves us politically towards the fringe.
When people lack connections to others, they are unable to test the veracity of their own views, whether in the give-and-take of casual conversation or in more formal deliberation. Without such an opportunity, people are more likely to be swayed by their worst impulses. It is no coincidence that random acts of violence, such as the 1999 spate of schoolyard shootings, tend to be committed by people identified, after the fact, as “loners.”
In other words, when we feel lonely, adrift, and unhappy, we may be more susceptible to the appeals of extremists on both the left and the right who promise community and utopia contingent on our willingness to overturn the existing social order.
So, if a decline in community life is fueling a demand for illiberalism, what can we do about it?
First, we can robustly and emphatically defend liberalism. We can clarify to people that their social malaise is a product of many factors unrelated to liberalism, and that abandoning a liberal social order is unlikely to alleviate it. We can peel back the curtain and reveal the realities of societies that have moved away from political, economic, and epistemic liberalism, demonstrating how these changes often worsen people’s lives. This is essential work, and we are indebted to the many great organizations and websites (including Reality’s Last Stand and New Discourses) that have been doing it.
But even as we articulate the benefits of liberalism, there is another approach we can simultaneously pursue: rebuilding the American community.
Putnam’s analysis is bleak, but he shares an essential silver lining: we have been here before. At the end of the 19th century, Americans faced many similar issues. Rapid industrialization had ushered in unprecedented material prosperity, but small towns and rural villages were being gutted. Increasingly, people found themselves lonely, adrift, and disengaged—but they recognized the problem and went to work. They founded churches, schools, clubs, and political organizations, sparking a social renaissance. Here’s how Putnam describes the “massive new structure of civic associations” that emerged as a result:
In the last decades of the nineteenth century Americans created and joined an unprecedented number of voluntary associations. Beginning in the 1870s and extending into the 1910s, new types of association multiplied, chapters of preexisting associations proliferated, and associations increasingly federated into state and national organizations. In Peoria and St. Louis, Boston and Boise and Bath and Bowling Green, Americans organized clubs and churches and lodges and veterans groups. Everywhere, from the great entrepôt metropolises to small towns in the heartland, the number of voluntary associations grew even faster than the rapidly growing population.
This civic renewal helped to knit the country back together. It rebuilt a new wave of civic associations to replace the ones that had been frayed or bulldozed by rising industrialization.
So, what if we did the same? What if our commitment to defending liberalism inspired us to look out and up, rather than merely down and in? What if we joined—or founded—PTAs, local churches, Rotary Clubs, and sporting leagues? What if we invited others in our community and networks to join with us, especially those who seem lonely and disaffected?
By fostering a civic renaissance, we could not only become happier and more connected; we could also address the root cause of illiberalism at its source.
-
About the Authors
Julian Adorney is a columnist at Reality's Last Stand and the founder of Heal the West, a substack movement dedicated to preserving liberalism. He’s also a writer for the Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism (FAIR). Find him on X: @Julian_Liberty.
Mark Johnson is a trusted advisor and executive coach at Pioneering Leadership and a facilitator and spiritual men's coach at The Undaunted Man. He has over 25 years of experience optimizing people and companies—he writes at The Undaunted Man’s Substack and Universal Principles.
Geoff is a Relationship Architect/Coach, multiple-International Best-Selling Author, Speaker, and Workshop Leader. He has spent the last twenty-six years coaching people world-wide, with a particular passion for supporting those in relationship, and helping men from all walks of life step up to their true potential. Along with Mark, he is a co-founder of The Undaunted Man.
==
Not churches, but okay.
#Julian Adorney#Mark Johnson#Geoff Laughton#liberalism#isolation#illiberalism#community#psychology#human psychology#disconnected#liberal ethics#liberal values#unhappiness#depression#anxiety#mental illness#mental health#mental health issues#religion is a mental illness
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
Private Needham Roberts (April 28, 1901 – April 18, 1949) was a soldier in the Harlem Hellfighters and recipient of the Purple Heart and the Croix de Guerre for his valor during WWI.
he was born in Trenton, New Jersey to Emma Roberts and the Reverend Norman Roberts. He sometimes spelled his first name as “Neadom”, which is how it appears on his grave marker. He was raised on Trenton’s Wilson Street, graduated from Lincoln Elementary School, and attended high school, but dropped out before graduating so he could begin working, first as a hotel bellhop, and as a clerk in a drugstore. At the start of US involvement in WWI, he lied about his age so he could enlist in the Army. He was assigned to the 369th Infantry Regiment, a unit of the 92nd Division.
While on guard duty on May 14, 1918, he and Private William Henry Johnson fought off a 24-man German patrol, though both were severely wounded. Both were awarded the Croix de Guerre to recognize their heroism. They received the Purple Heart in 1932; for him, this was a posthumous award. In 2002, he was posthumously awarded the Distinguished Service Cross; in 2015 his award was upgraded to the Medal of Honor.
He was disabled by his wounds, and unable to maintain steady employment. He occasionally gave paid lectures about his wartime experiences, and in the early 1940s gave radio addresses and other speeches as part of the Army’s effort to recruit African-Americans for WWII. #africanhistory365 #africanexcellence
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Suicide Squad fancast
My other DC fancasts
DCEU recast
Burtonverse Recast
Batman
Superman
Wonder Woman
The Flash
Green Lantern
Aquaman
Justice League
Green Arrow
Teen Titans
Justice League Dark
Batman Beyond
The Dark Knight Returns
Telltale’s Batman
Injustice
Legion Of Doom
Birds Of Prey
Octavia Spencer as Amanda Waller
Daniel Craig as Colonel Rick Flag
Pedro Pascal as Deadshot/Floyd Lawton
Josh Lawson as Captain Boomerang/Digger Harkness
Anya Taylor-Joy as Harley Quinn/Harleen Quinzel
Idris Elba as Bloodsport/Robert Dubois
Mustafa Shakir as Bronze Tiger/Benjamin Turner
Natalie Dormer as Killer Frost/Louise Lincoln
Kevin Nash as King Shark/Nanaue
Michael B Jordan as Black Spider/Eric Needham
Vladimir Mashkov as KGBeast/Anatoli Knyazev
Channing Tatum as Peacemaker/Christopher Smith
Jessie Mei Li as Nightshade/Eve Eden
Alexandra Daddario as Enchantress/Dr June Moon
Oleg Prudius as The Electrocutioner/Lester Buchinsky
Zelina Vega as Copperhead/Larissa Diaz
Nikolaj Coster-Waldau as Cluemaster/Arthur Brown
Daniela Melchior as Ratcatcher II/Cleo Cazo
Sadie Sink as Plastique/ Bette San Souci
Stephen Lang as Deathstroke/Slade Wilson
#DC#Fancasts#Suicide Squad#Amanda Waller#Rick Flag#Deadshot#Bloodsport#Harley Quinn#Captain Boomerang#Bronze Tiger#Killer Frost#King Shark#Black Spider#KGBeast#Peacemaker#Nightshade#Enchantress#The Electrocutioner#Copperhead#Ratcatcher II#Cluemaster#Plastique#Deathstroke
20 notes
·
View notes
Text
names, mostly surnames (1)
let me apologise for this partial list of names in the library, titles available on request...
, Adorno, horkheimer, anderson, aristotle, greta adorno, marcuse, agamben, acampora and acampora, althussar, lajac kovacic, eric alliez, marc auge, attali, francis bacon (16th c), aries, aries and bejin, alain badiou, beckett, hallward, barnes, bachelard, bahktin, volshinov, baudrillard, barthes, john beattie, medvedev, henri bergson, Jacques Bidet, berkman, zybmunt bauman, burgin, baugh, sam butler, ulrich beck, andrew benjamin and peter osbourne, walter benjamin, ernest bloch, blanchot, bruzins, bonnet, karin bojs, bourdieu, j.d. bernal, goldsmith, benveniste, braidotti, brecht, burch, victor serge, andre breton, judith butler, malcolm bull, stanley cohen, john berger, etienne balibar, david bohm, gans blumenberg, martin buber, christopher caudwell, micel callon, albert camus, agnes callard, castoridis, claudio celis bueno, carchedi and roberts, Marisol de la cadena, mario blaser, nancy cartwright, manual castells, mark currie, collingwood, canguilhem, mario corti, stuart hall, andrew lowe, paul willis, coyne, stefan collini, varbara cassin, helene cixous, coward and ellis, clastres, carr, cioren, irving copi, cassirer, carter and willians, margeret cohen, Francoise dastur, guy debord, agnes martin, michele bernstein, alice, lorraine dastun, debaise, Gilles Deleuze, deleuze and gattari, guattari, parnet, iain mackenzie, bignall, stivale, holland, smith, james williams, zourabichvili, paul patton, kerslake, schuster, bogue, bryant, anne sauvagnargues, hanjo berresen, frida beckman, johnson, gulliarme and hughes, valentine moulard-leonard, desai, dosse, duttman, d’amico, benoit peters, derrida, hinca zarifopol-johnston, sean gaston, discourse, mark poster, foucault, steve fuller, markus gabrial, rosenbergm milchamn, colin jones, van fraasen, fekete, vilem flusser, flahault, heri focillon, rudi visker, ernst fischer, fink, faye, fuller, fiho, marco bollo, hans magnus enxensberger, leen de bolle, canetti, ilya enrenberg, thuan, sebastion peake, mervyn peake, robert henderson, reimann, roth, bae suah, yabouza, marco bellatin, cartarescu, nick harkaway, chris norris, deLanda, regis debray, pattern and doniger, soame jynens, bernard williams, descartes, anne dufourmanteille, michelle le doeuff, de certaeu , deligny, Georges Dumezil, dumenil and levy, bernard edelman, victorverlich, berio, arendt, amy allen, de beauvior,hiroka azumi, bedau and humphreys, beuad, georges bataille, caspar henderson, chris innes, yevgeny zamyatin, louis aragon, italo calvino, pierre guirard, trustan garcia, rene girard, paul gilroy, michal gardner, andre gorz, jurgan gabermas, martin gagglund, beatrice hannssen, jean hyppolyte, axel honneth, zizek and crickett, stephen heath, calentin groebner, j.b.s. haldane, ian hacking, david hakken, hallward and oekken, haug, harman, latour, arnold hauser, hegel, pippin, pinksrd, michel henry, louis hjelmslev, gilbert hardin, alice jardine, karl jaspers, suzzane kirkbright, david hume, thomas hobbes, barry hindus, paul hirst, hindess and hirst, wrrner hamacher, bertrand gille, julien huxley, halavais, irigaray, ted honderich, julia kristeva, leibnitz, d lecourt, lazzaroto, kluge and negt, alexander kluge, sarah kofman, alexandre kojeve, kolozoya, keynes, richard kangston, ben lehman, kant, francous jullien, fred hameson, sntonio rabucchi, jaeggi, steve lanierjones, tim jackson, jakobson, joeseph needham, arne de boever, marx and engels, karl marx, frederick engels, heinrich, McLellen , maturana and varuna, lem, lordon, jean jacques-lecercle, malabou, marazzi, heiner muller, mary midgley, armand matterlart, ariel dorfman, matakovsky, nacneice, lucid, victor margolis, narco lippi, glen mazis, nair, william morris, nabis, jean luc nancy, geoffrey nash, antonio negri, negri and hardt, hardt, keith ansell pearson, pettman, william ruddiman, rheinberger, andre orlean, v.i. vernadsky, rodchenko, john willet, tarkovsky, william empson, michel serres, virillio, semiotexte, helmut heiseenbuttel, plessner, pechaux, raunig, retort, saito, serres, dolphin, maria assad, spinoza, bernard sharratt, isabelle stengers, viktor shklovsky, t. todorov, enzo traverso, mario tronti, todes, ivan pavlov, whitehead, frank trentmann, trubetzkoy, rodowink, widderman, karl wittfogel, peter handke, olivier rolin, pavese, robert walser, petr kral, von arnim, sir john mennis, ladies cabinet, samuel johnson, edmund spenser, efy poppy, yoko ogawa, machado, kaurence durrell, brigid brophy, a. betram chandler, maria gabriella llansol, fowler, ransmayr, novick, llewellyn, brennan, sean carroll, julien rios, pintor, wraxall, jaccottet, tabucchi, iain banks, glasstone, clarice lispector, murakami, ludmilla petrushevskaya, motoya, bachmann, lindqvist, uwe johnson, einear macbride, szentkuthy, vladislavic, nanguel, mathias enard, chris tomas, jonathan meades, armo schmidt, charles yu, micheal sorkin, vilas- matas, varesi, peter weiss, stephenson, paul legrande, virginie despentes, pessoa, brin, furst, gunter trass, umberto eco, reid, paul,klee, mario levero, hearn, judith schalansky, moorhead, margert walters, rodchenko and popova, david king, alisdair gray, burroughs, ben fine, paul hirst, hindess, kapuscinski, tchaikovsky, brooke-rose, david hoon kim, helms, mahfouz, ardret, felipe fernandez-armesto, young and tagomon, aronson, bonneuil and fressoz, h.s. bennett, amy allen, bruckner brown, honegger, bernhard, warren miller, albert thelen, margoy bennett, rose macauley, nenjamin peret, sax rohmer, angeliki, bostrom, phillip ball, the invisible commitee, bataille and leiris, gregory bateson, michelle barrett and mary mcintosh, bardini, bugin, mcdonald, kaplan, buck-moores, chesterman and lipman, berman, cicero, chanan, chatelet, helene cixous, iain cha,bers, smirgel, norman clark, caird, camus, clayre, chomsky, critchley, curry, swingewood, luigi luca cavelli-sforza, clark, esposito, doerner, de duve, alexander dovzhenko, donzelot, dennet, doyle, burkheim, de camp, darwin, dawkins, didi-huberman, dundar, george dyson, berard deleuze, evo, barbara ehrenrich, edwards, e isenstein, ebeking, economy and society, esposito, frederick gross, david edgeerton, douglas, paul,feyerband, jerry fodor, gorrdiener, tom forester, korsgaard, fink, floridi, elizabeth groscz, pierre francastel, jane jacobs, francois laplantinee, gould, galloway, goux, godel, grouys, genette, gil, kahloo, giddens, martin gardner, gilbert and dubar, hobbes, herve, golinski, grotowski, glieck, hayles, heidegger, huxley, eric hobsbawn, jean-louis hippolyte, phillip hoare, tim jordan, david harvey, hawking, hoggart, rosemary jackson, myerson, mary jacobus, fox keller, illich, sarah fofman, sylvia harvey, john holloway, han, jaspers, yuk hui, pierre hadot, carl gardner, william james, bell hooks, edmond jabes, kierkegaard, alexander keen, kropotkin, tracy kidder, mithen, kothari and mehta, lind, c. joad, bart kosko, kathy myers, kaplan, luce irigaraay, patrick ke iller, kittler, catherine belsey, kmar, klossowski, holmes, kant, stanton, ernesto laclau, jenkins, la mouffe, walter john williams, adam greenfield, susan greenfield, paul auster, viet nguyen, jeremy nicholson, andy weir, fred jameson, lacoue-labarthe, bede, jane gallop, lacan, wilden, willy ley, henri lefebvre, rob sheilds, sandra laugier, micheal lowy, barry levinson, sylvain lazurus, lousardo, leopardo, jean-francois lyotard, jones, lewontin, steve levy, alice in genderland, laing, lanier, lakatos, laurelle, luxemburg, lukacs, jarsh, james lovelock, ideologu and consciousness, economy and society, screen, deleuze studies, deleuze and guattari studies, bruno latour, david lapoujade, stephen law, primo levi, levi-strauss, emmanuel levinas, viktor schonberger, pierre levy, gustav landaur, robin le poidevin, les levidow, lautman, david cooper, serge leclaire, catherine malabou, karl kautsky, alice meynall, j.s. mill, montainge, elaine miller, rosa levine-meyer, jean luc marion, henri lefebrve, lipovetsky, terry lovell, niklas luhmann, richard may, machiavelli, richard mabey, john mullzrkey, meyerhold, edward braun, magri, murray, nathanial lichfield, noelle mcafee, hans meyer, ouspensky, lucretius, asa briggs, william morris, christian metz, laura mulvey, len masterman, karl mannheim, louis marin, alaister reynolds, antonio munoz molina, FRAZER, arno schmidt, dinae waldman, mark rothko, cornwall, micheal snow, sophie henaff, scarlett thomas, matuszewski, lillya brik, rosamond lehman , morris and o’conner, nina bawden, cora sandel, delafield, storm jameson, lovi , rachel ferguson, stevie smith, pat barker, miles franklin, fay weldon, crista wolff, grace paley, v. woolf, naomi mitchinson, sheila rowbotham, e, somerville and v ross, sander marai, jose saramago, strugatsky, jean echenoz, mark robso, vladimir Vernadsky, chris marker, Kim Stanley Robinson, mario leverdo, r.a. lafferty, martin bax, mcaulay, tatyana tolstaya, colinn kapp, jonathan meades, franco fortini, sam delany, philip e high, h.g. adler, feng menglong, adam thorpe, peeter nadas, sam butler, narnold silver, deren, joanna moorhead, leonara carrington, de waal, hartt, botticelli, charbonneau, casco pratolini, murakami, aldiss, guidomorselli, ludmilla petrushevskaya, ,schulz, de andrade, yasushi. inoue, renoir, amelie nothomb, ken liu, prynne, ANTIONE VOLODINE, luc brasso, angela greene, dorothea tanning, eric chevillard, margot bennett w.e. johns, conan doyle, samuel johnson, herge, coutine-denamy, sterling, roubaud, sloan, meiville, delarivier manley, andre norton, perec, edward upward, tom mcCarthy, magrinya, stross, eco, godden, malcolm lowry, derekmiller, ismail kadare, scott lynch, chris fowler, perter newman, suzzana clarke, paretky, juliscz balicki, stanislaw maykowski, rajaniemi, william morris, c.k. crow, ueys, oldenburg, mssrc chwmot, will pryce, munroe, brnabas and kindersley, tromans, lem, zelazny, mitchinson, harry Harrison, konstantin tsiolkovsky, flammerion, harrison, arthur c clarke, carpenter, john brunner, anhony powell, ted white, sheckley, kristof, kempowski, shingo, angelica groodischer, rolin, galeanom dobin, richard holloway, pohl and kornbulth, e.r. eddison, ken macleodm aldiss, dave hutchinson, alfred bester, budrys, pynchon, kurkov, wisniewski_snerg, , kenji miyazawa, dante, laidlaw, paek nam_nyong, maspero, colohouquon, hernandez, christina hesselholdt, claude simon, bulgaakov, simak, verissimo, sorokin, sarraute, prevert, celan, bachmann, mervin peake, olaf stapledon, sa rohmer, robert musil, le clezio, jeremy cooper, zambra, giorgio de chirico, mjax frisch, gawron, daumal, tomzza, canetti, framcois maspero, de quincy, defoe, green,, greene, marani, bellatin, khury, tapinar,, richmal crompton, durrenmat, fritz, quintane, volponi, nanni balestrini, herrera, robert walser, duras, peter stamm, m foster, lan wright, their theotokism agustn de rojas, paul eluard, sturgeon, hiromi kawakomi, sayaka murata, wolfgang hilbig, hmilton, z zivkovic, gersson, mallo, bird, chaudrey, Toussaint, Can Xue, Lewis Mumford, neitzsche, popper, zizek, scott westerfield, rousseau, lewis munford, tod may, penelope maddy, elaine marks, isabelle courtivron, leroi, massumi, david sterritt, godard, millican and clark, macabe, negri, mauss, maiimon, patrica maccormack, moretti, courtney humphries, monad, moyn, malina, picasso, goldman, dambisa moyo, merleau-ponty, Nicholson, knobe and nichols, poinciore, morris, ovid, ming, nail, thomas more, richard mabey, macfarlane, piscator, louis-stempal, negrastini, moore, jacquline rose, rose and rose, ryle, roszick, rosenburg, ravisson, paul ricoer, rossler, chantl mouffe, david reiff, plato, slater, rowlands, rosa, john roberts, rhan, dubios and rousseau, ronell, jacques ranciere, mallarme, quinodoz, peterpelbert, mary poovey, mackenzie, andrew price, opopper, roger penrose, lu cino parisi, gavin rae, parker and pollack, mirowoski, perniola, postman, panofsky, propp, paschke and rodel, andre pickering, massabuau, lars svenddsen, rosenberg and whyte, t.l.s. sprigger, nancy armstrong, sallis, dale spender, stanislavski, vanessa schwartz, shapin and shaeffer, sally sedgewick, signs, gabriel tarde, charles singer, adam smith, simondon, pascal chablt, combes, jon roffee, edward said, sen, nik farrell fox, sartre, fred emery, scholes, herbert spencer, ruth saw, spinoza, raphael sassower, henry sidgewick, peter singer, katarznya de lazari-radek, piaget, podach, van der post, on fire, one press, melossi and pavarini, pearl and mackenzie, theirry paquot, tanizaki, RHS, stone, richard sennett, graham priest, osborn and pagnell, substance, pedrag cicovacki, schilthuizen, susan sontag, gillian rose, nikolas rose, g rattery taylor, rose, rajan, stuart sim, max raphael, media culture and society, heller- roazen, rid, root, rossi, gramsci, showstack sasson, david roden, adrew ross, rosenvallion, pauliina remes, pkato, peter sloterdijk, tamsin shaw, george simmel, bullock and trombley, mark francis, alain supiot, suvin, mullen and suvin, stroma, maimonides, van vogt, the clouds on unknowing, enclotic, thesis 11, spivack, kate raworth, h.w. richardson, hillial schwartz, stern, rebecca solnit, rowland parker, pickering, lukacs, epicriud, epicetus, lucrtious, aurelies, w.j.oates, thor Hanson, thompson, mabey, sheldrake, eatherley, plato, jeffries, dorothy richardson, arno schmidt, earl derr biggersm mary borden, birrel, arno schmidt, o.a. henty, berhard steigler, victor serge, smith, joyce salisbury, pauer-studer, timpanaro, s helling, schlor, norman and welchman, searle, emanuele severarimo, tomasello, sklar, judith singer, walmisley, thomas malthus, quentin meilassoux, alberto meelucchi, mingione, rurnbull, said, spufford and uglow, zone, j.j.c. smartt, sandel, skater, songe-moller, strawson, strawson, strawson, raymond tallis, toscano, turkle, tiqquin, diggins, j.s. ogilivy, w.w. hutchings, rackgam, deiter roth, dowell, red notes, campbell and pryce,osip brik, lilya brik, mayakovsky, zone, alvin toffker, st exupery, freya stark, warson, walsh, wooley, tiles and oberdick, timofeeva, richardson, marcuse, marder, wright, ushenko, tolson, albebers and moholy- nagy, alyce mahon, gablik, burnett, barry, hill, fontaine, sanuel johnson,justin, block, taylor, peter handke, jacques rivette, william sansom, bunuel and dali, tom bullough, aldius huxley, philip robinson, spendor, tzara, wajcman, peter wohlleben, prigogini, paolo virno, jeremy tunstall, theweliet, taussig, tricker, vince, thomss, williams, vogl, new german critique, e.p. thompson, jean wahl, paul virilio, lotringer, christy wampole, verhaeghe, janet wolff, anna kavan, vergara, uexkull, couze venn, barry smart, vico, vatimo, vernant, raoul vaneigem, ibn warraq, vertov, williams, meiksins wood, norbert weiner, peter wollen, h.g. wells, michelle walker, , jeanne waelit walters, shaw and darlen, whorf, ward and dubois, john wright, weinart, wolff, willis, wark, cosima wagner, j. weeks, judith williamson, welzbacher, erik olin wright, wittgenstein, kenny, zeldin, wenders, henry miller, wenkler, arrighi, banks, innes, ushereood, kristeva, john cage, quignard, t.f. powys, siri hustveldt, lem, zelazny, mitchonson, tsilolkovsky, toussaint, heppenstall, garrigasait, de kerangal, haine fenn, jean bloch, geoff ryman, reve, corey, asemkulov, ernaux, gareth powell, cory, deleuze and guattari studies, cse, allain and souvestre, apolinaire, jane austen, john arden, aitmatov, elizabth von arnim, paul auster, abish, ackroyd, tom gunn, lorca, akhmatov, artuad, simon armatige, albahari, felipe alfau, audem auden and soendor, varicco, barrico, bainbridge, asturias, ronan bennett, beckett, paul bowles, jane bowles, celine, bukowski, wu ming, blissert, kay boyle, andrei bely, hugo barnacle, BOLL, isak dineson, karen blikson, brodsky, richmel crompton, berry, barthleme, mary butts, leonora carrington, cage, chevhillard, canetti, cendres, butor, cortazar, danielewski, bertha damon, dyer, havier cercas, micheal dibden, marguerite duras, john donne, duras, durrell, dorrie, Fredric durrenmatt, heppenstahl, eco, enzensberger, evanovich, fruentes, farrell, alison fell, alisdair gray, hollinhurst, andre gide, jean giono, gadda, henry green, grass, andre gorz, william gibson, joyce, gombrowitz, alex laishley, murakami, herve guibert, franz kafka, juenger, junker, kapuscinski, laurie king, kundera, mcewan, ken macleod, ian macdonald, moers, meades, vonda macintyre, nalmstom, maillert, havier marias, jeff noon, anaus nin, david nobbs, peter nadas, nabokov, iakley, oates, raymond queneau, cesare pavese, paterson, ponge, perte, perec, chinery, ovid, genette, kandinsky, robert pinget, richard piwers, rouvaud, sloan, surrralist poetry, ilya troyanov, paul,raabe, julien rios, arne dahl, pierre sollers, rodrigruez, chris ross, renate rasp, ruiz, rulfo, tove jannsson, cabre, vladislavic, tokarczuk, pessoa, jane bowles, calvino, lispector, lydia davis, can xue, sebald, peter tripp, hertzberg, virginia woolf, zozola, sorrentino, higgins, v.w. straka, cogman, freud, jung, klein, winnecot, lacan, fordham, samuels, jung, freud, appignesai, bjp, pullman, magnam, sybil marshall, mccarten, galbraith, jewell, lehmann, levy, levin, jung, spinoza, fairburn, jung, sandler, lacan, laplanche, pontalis, can, xue, klein, cavelli, hawkins, stevens, hanna segal, bollas, welldon, williams, sutherland, buon, symington, morrison, brittain, sidoli, sidoli, holmes, bowlby, winnecott, bollas, kalschiid, malan, patrick casement, anna frued, wittenburg, liz wright, fordham, fairburn, symington, sandler, jung, balint, coltart, west, steiner, van der post, stern, green, roustang, adrew samuels, d.l. sayers, salom, krassner, swain, rame and fo, storr, cogman, hessen, penelope fitzgerald, cummings, richard holloway, juhea kim, glenville, heyer, cartland, kim, cho, atkinson, james, king, audten, hartley, du maurier, bronte, thomas, plath, leon, camillairi, kaussar, fred fargas, boyd, sjowall and wahloo, pheby, morenno-garcia, perrsson, herron, nicola barker, arronovitch, karen lord, stephen frosh, ernest jones, flamm o’brien, shin, mishra, chin jin-young and so on to the warm horizon
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
Actor Robert Rhodes has been cast as a dragonseed named Silver Denys. A dragonseed is a Targaryen bastard or a descendant of a Targaryen bastard.
Here are non-spoiler excerpts of that article.
The cast of HBO's House of the Dragon may have gotten a bit larger. According to Redanian Intelligence, the Game of Thrones prequel series has cast Robert Rhodes as Silver Denys for Season 2 of the series. [ ... ] In addition to Rhodes, it was recently reported that Raised By Wolves star Amanda Collin had been cast as Jeyne Arryn, Lady of the Eyrie also known as the Maiden of the Vale. It was also recently reported that Gayle Rankin is playing Alys Rivers, a healer, and resident of Harrenhal, Simon Russell Beale is playing Ser Simon Strong, the Castellan of Harrenhal and great-uncle to Lord Larys Strong (Matthew Needham), and Freddie Fox is playing Ser Gwayne Hightower, the son of Otto Hightower (Rhys Ifans), brother to Queen Alicent (Olivia Cooke). [ ... ] Even with the ongoing WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes, production on Season 2 of House of the Dragon continues. The series is able to continue filming in the U.K. as its actors — who are also from the U.K. — are working under contract with a local union, Equity. The series also reportedly had completed scripts for the season ready ahead of the WGA strike.
It may just be a coincidence, but Denys is the Latin alphabet transliteration of the Ukrainian version of Dennis (Денис). The prime minister of Ukraine is named Denys Shmyhal' (Денис Шмигаль). 🇺🇦
BTW, Robert Rhodes wrote this piece related to the scarring on one side of his face.
If I catch you staring at my scars, prepare for me to ask you why
He seems pretty cool – which makes him typical of HotD cast.
#game of thrones#house of the dragon#robert rhodes#silver denys#dragonseeds#gra o tron#ród smoka#la maison du dragon#дім дракона#juego de tronos#jogo dos tronos#a casa do dragão#la casa del dragón#龙之家族#ejderha evi#হাউস অফ দ্য ড্রাগন#하우스 오브 드래곤#آل التنين#σπίτι του δράκου#gia tộc rồng#lohikäärmeen talo#isang kanta ng yelo at apoy#בית הדרקון#ड्रैगन का घर#sárkányok háza#rod draka#ハウス・オブ・ザ・ドラゴン#дом дракона#huis van de draak#haus des drachen
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Detective Elizabeth "Lizzie" Needham from CBS Instinct (United States of America)
Krystyna Kaminski from Fireman Sam (United Kingdom)
Anna Mikhailovna from Servant of the People (Ukraine)
Astrid Hofferson-Haddock from How to Train Your Dragon (United States of America/Scandinavia/Canada)
Dr. Vittoria Vetra from Dan Brown's Robert Langdon series (United States of America)
#fandom#fandom questions#character quiz#quizzes#rounds#cartoons#films and tv shows#servant of the people#sluga naroda#sluga narodu#sluha narodu#kvartal 95#polsat#how to train your dragon#httyd#dreamworks#cbs instinct#fireman sam#robert langdon series#dan brown#american films and tv shows#canadian films and tv shows#european films and tv shows#animation
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
Interesting Papers for Week 19, 2023
Attentional Enhancement of Tracked Stimuli in Early Visual Cortex Has Limited Capacity. Adamian, N., & Andersen, S. K. (2022). Journal of Neuroscience, 42(46), 8709–8715.
Precise movement-based predictions in the mouse auditory cortex. Audette, N. J., Zhou, W., La Chioma, A., & Schneider, D. M. (2022). Current Biology, 32(22), 4925-4940.e6.
Encoding contexts are incidentally reinstated during competitive retrieval and track the temporal dynamics of memory interference. Bramão, I., Jiang, J., Wagner, A. D., & Johansson, M. (2022). Cerebral Cortex, 32(22), 5020–5035.
Post-developmental plasticity of the primary rod pathway allows restoration of visually guided behaviors. Cao, Y., Fajardo, D., Guerrero-Given, D., Samuel, M. A., Ohtsuka, T., Boye, S. E., … Martemyanov, K. A. (2022). Current Biology, 32(22), 4783-4796.e3.
Entorhinal cortex directs learning-related changes in CA1 representations. Grienberger, C., & Magee, J. C. (2022). Nature, 611(7936), 554–562.
Embodied decisions during walking. Grießbach, E., Raßbach, P., Herbort, O., & Cañal-Bruland, R. (2022). Journal of Neurophysiology, 128(5), 1207–1223.
Altered basal ganglia output during self-restraint. Gu, B.-M., & Berke, J. D. (2022). eLife, 11, e82143.
Temporal filters in response to presynaptic spike trains: interplay of cellular, synaptic and short-term plasticity time scales. Mondal, Y., Pena, R. F. O., & Rotstein, H. G. (2022). Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 50(4), 395–429.
Active Licking Shapes Cortical Taste Coding. Neese, C., Bouaichi, C. G., Needham, T., Bauer, M., Bertram, R., & Vincis, R. (2022). Journal of Neuroscience, 42(46), 8658–8669.
Sensory Target Detection at Local and Global Timescales Reveals a Hierarchy of Supramodal Dynamics in the Human Cortex. Niedernhuber, M., Raimondo, F., Sitt, J. D., & Bekinschtein, T. A. (2022). Journal of Neuroscience, 42(46), 8729–8741.
Evolutionary shaping of human brain dynamics. Pang, J. C., Rilling, J. K., Roberts, J. A., van den Heuvel, M. P., & Cocchi, L. (2022). eLife, 11, e80627.
Input-timing-dependent plasticity at incoming synapses of the mushroom body facilitates olfactory learning in Drosophila. Qiao, J., Yang, S., Geng, H., Yung, W.-H., & Ke, Y. (2022). Current Biology, 32(22), 4869-4880.e4.
Estimating the time structure of descending activation that generates movements at different speeds. Ramadan, R., Hummert, C., Jokeit, J.-S., & Schöner, G. (2022). Journal of Neurophysiology, 128(5), 1091–1105.
Predictable Fluctuations in Excitatory Synaptic Strength Due to Natural Variation in Presynaptic Firing Rate. Ren, N., Wei, G., Ghanbari, A., & Stevenson, I. H. (2022). Journal of Neuroscience, 42(46), 8608–8620.
Coexisting neuronal coding strategies in the barrel cortex. Sharma, H., & Azouz, R. (2022). Cerebral Cortex, 32(22), 4986–5004.
The impact of familiarity on cortical taste coding. Staszko, S. M., Boughter, J. D., & Fletcher, M. L. (2022). Current Biology, 32(22), 4914-4924.e4.
Unlocking crowding by ensemble statistics. Tiurina, N. A., Markov, Y. A., Choung, O.-H., Herzog, M. H., & Pascucci, D. (2022). Current Biology, 32(22), 4975-4981.e3.
Functional interactions among neurons within single columns of macaque V1. Trepka, E. B., Zhu, S., Xia, R., Chen, X., & Moore, T. (2022). eLife, 11, e79322.
Episodic memory in aspects of brain information transfer by resting-state network topology. Yan, T., Wang, G., Wang, L., Liu, T., Li, T., Wang, L., … Suo, D. (2022). Cerebral Cortex, 32(22), 4969–4985.
Control becomes habitual early on when learning a novel motor skill. Yang, C. S., Cowan, N. J., & Haith, A. M. (2022). Journal of Neurophysiology, 128(5), 1278–1291.
#science#Neuroscience#computational neuroscience#Brain science#research#cognition#cognitive science#neurons#neural networks#neural computation#neurobiology#psychophysics#scientific publications
4 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Medal of Honor Monday: Henry Johnson
During this week in 1919, a parade welcomes the New York National Guard home from World War I. Among the American heroes recognized that day was Private Henry Johnson. He had already been awarded the French Croix de Guerre. He would also ultimately receive a Medal of Honor.
Perhaps no one expected the 5’4” railroad porter from Albany to become such a hero?
Soon after the United States entered World War I, Johnson enlisted in an all-black regiment. The 369th Infantry departed for France by the end of 1917, where they would serve under French command.
Johnson’s heroism came during the wee morning hours of May 15. He and another soldier, Private Needham Roberts, were on sentry duty near the front lines. They were protecting both a French and an American regiment behind them.
The story continues here: https://www.taraross.com/post/tdih-henry-johnson-moh
#this week in history#medal of honor monday#medal monday#world war i#wwi#us army#heroes#sharethehistory
3 notes
·
View notes