#Narendra Modi Speech Today

[rightnewshindi]

हमें यह घोषणा नहीं करनी चाहिए कि हम भगवान बन गए हैं; जानें मोहन भागवत ने किसको कहा ऐसा

हमें यह घोषणा नहीं करनी चाहिए कि हम भगवान बन गए हैं; जानें मोहन भागवत ने किसको कहा ऐसा #MohanBhagwat #RSS #IndianPolitics #Leadership #Hinduism #CulturalHeritage #NationBuilding #UnityInDiversity #PoliticalInfluence #SocialIssues #CommunityDevelopment #In

RSS Chief On Manipur: राष्ट्रीय स्वयंसेवक संघ (आरएसएस) प्रमुख मोहन भागवत ने गुरुवार, 5 सितंबर को शंकर दिनकर केन के शताब्दी वर्ष के अवसर पर आयोजित एक कार्यक्रम में कहा कि यह लोग तय करते हैं कि अपने काम में श्रेष्ठ प्र��र्शन करने वाले व्यक्ति को भगवान माना जाना चाहिए या नहीं, वह शख्स ये बातें खुद तय नहीं कर सकता है. शंकर दिनकर ने 1971 तक मणिपुर में बच्चों की शिक्षा पर ध्यान केंद्रित करते हुए काम…

[thenewsfactsnow]

Ram Mandir Inauguration: PM Modi's 10 Empowering Messages

Ram Mandir Inauguration today is a historic moment for India. Prime Minister Narendra Modi delivered a historic address to a gathering of 7000 including devotees, celebs and who is who of society after the Pran-Pratishtha event at the Ayodhya Ram Mandir, marking a significant moment in India’s cultural and religious history. In his speech, the Prime Minister declared, “January 22, 2024, is not…

[newsprovidernetwork]

लाल किले से अपने संबोधन के दौरान, भारत के प्रधान मंत्री नरेंद्र मोदी ने स्वतंत्रता दिवस के उपलक्ष्य में "140 करोड़ परिवार के सदस्यों" को शुभकामनाएं दीं। उन्होंने भारत को विश्व का सबसे बड़ा लोकतंत्र और जनसंख्या की दृष्टि से अग्रणी देश माना।

प्रधानमंत्री ने राष्ट्रीय ध्वज फहराने के बाद राष्ट्र के नाम अपना भाषण शुरू किया। यह कार्यक्रम "आजादी का अमृत महोत्सव" समारोह के समापन का प्रतीक है, जिसे 2021 में प्रधान मंत्री द्वारा शुरू किया गया था।

इस वर्ष, समाज के विभिन्न क्षेत्रों से लगभग 1,800 विशिष्ट अतिथियों को दिल्ली के लाल किले में स्वतंत्रता दिवस समारोह में भाग लेने के लिए निमंत्रण दिया गया है।

[probablyasocialecologist]

What is unique, at least since the era of open colonialism and its genocides, is the unity this carnage has inspired among political elites in the Global North, and to some extent beyond it. After all, when fascism rose in Europe the 1930s, it had powerful supporters in our political classes, but it also had powerful opponents. That is far less true today. All across what passes for a political spectrum, from the rabid far right to the mealy-mouthed centre left, we have witnessed powerful actors putting their partisan differences aside to come together in active support of these crimes against humanity. Far from fracturing our political class, this iteration of fascism has united it: Donald Trump agrees with Joe Biden; Rishi Sunak with Keir Starmer, Emanuel Macron with Marine Le Pen; Justin Trudeau with Giorgia Meloni; Viktor Orbán with Narendra Modi. And so, we must ask: On what precisely do they all agree? What are they uniting behind? What are they all defending when they speak of Israel’s ‘right to defend itself’? It’s too simple, I’m afraid, to say they are united in defense of a single state. They are, of course, but they are also united in defense of a shared belief system. Amidst the reality of global economic apartheid and accelerating climate breakdown, they are united in a shared supremacist vision of safety and security for the few. This vision is the flip side of their steadfast refusal to in any way address the underlying drivers of these crises: capitalism, limitless growth, colonialism, militarism, white supremacy, patriarchy. As Sherene Seikaly puts it, we are ‘In the age of catastrophe’ and ‘Palestine is a paradigm’. 

[mariacallous]

Shafiq Bagwan was hanging out with a few friends in his village of Hasnabad, which is in the Maharashtra state in western India, when he opened Instagram on his phone and saw that his younger brother Taufiq had posted an update. When he clicked on it, his heart fell.

Taufiq, who is 18, had posted a picture of a 17th-century Mughal emperor, Aurangzeb, with a description of him as “the father of Hindu nationalists.”

“I immediately called him up and ordered him to delete the story,” Bagwan says. “I got scared for him, and I hoped that nobody had seen it.” It was too late. The next day, June 20, Taufiq was arrested and charged with��deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings.”

Taufiq had been caught up in an online crusade, initiated by Hindu nationalists in Maharashtra, who have taken it upon themselves to police social media for anything, no matter how tenuous, they can spin as offensive to Hindus. These groups, which appear to have links to local government and law enforcement, are turning Instagram and WhatsApp into hostile spaces for Muslims, who face harassment and arrest for seemingly innocuous posts. It’s another demonstration of how the Indian internet is coming to mirror the Hindu nationalist slant of politics under the government of Narendra Modi.

“What has happened offline has happened online,” says Osama Manzar, founder of the Digital Empowerment Foundation, an NGO. “The attitude remains the same. Social media is just another tool to subjugate.”

Aurangzeb died more than 300 years ago, but he’s recently become something of a protest symbol for Muslim youth in Maharashtra. During his rule, which lasted from 1658 to 1707, he expanded the Mughal empire across much of the Indian subcontinent. To some Hindus, he’s a tyrannical figure who imposed discriminatory taxes and destroyed temples and who was resisted by Shivaji, another warrior king who is revered in Maharashtra.

With tensions between communities running high, Aurangzeb has become an emblem for both the Hindu majority and its 13 million Muslims, who make up around 12 percent of the population of the state.

“Aurangzeb, a Muslim ruler, is just a political tool to target today’s ordinary Muslims,” says Surendra Jondhale, a professor in the department of politics at the University of Mumbai. “The right-wing groups have used Shivaji versus Aurangzeb—a battle between two kingdoms—to propagate a Hindu versus Muslim binary.”

In February 2023, led by Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party, the union government renamed the city of Aurangabad in Maharashtra—named after Aurangzeb—to Sambhaji Nagar. In rallies that followed the renaming—and which were attended by members of the BJP—T Raja Singh, a party member and (currently suspended) lawmaker, said that any Muslim unhappy with the name change would be considered a traitor.

The BJP has been widely accused of stoking religious tensions across India, and of promoting a Hindu identity for India that runs contrary to the country’s founding principles of religious pluralism.

In response to often brazen hate speech and discrimination from public figures, young Muslims have adopted Aurangzeb as a symbol of defiance. “It comes from a place of angst and humiliation, where the Muslims are continuously being provoked,” says Imtiaz Jaleel, a lawmaker from Aurangabad. “Under normal circumstances, I don’t think the Muslims even think about Aurangzeb.”

But posting the former ruler’s picture often elicits serious consequences. Right-wing Hindu groups, which have been publicly supported by members of Modi’s BJP, have been keeping a close eye on Muslims’ social media posts, claiming that even a photograph of Aurangzeb hurts their religious sentiments.

This is what happened to Taufiq, who, Shafiq says, doesn’t understand English and so wasn’t aware of what was written alongside the image he posted. But before he had time to delete the story, someone in his village had taken a screenshot.

Rupesh Rathi, 40, works in Hasnabad for Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a parent organization of BJP. He says that ever since Aurangabad was renamed, these situations have become more prevalent. “A Hindu friend of Taufiq in the village saw his story, took a screenshot, and sent it to me,” says Rathi. “After that, some seven or eight of us had a discussion on what to do about it.”

The consensus was to file a complaint. “Everybody found it objectionable,” Rathi says.

Armed with those screenshots, some 20-25 people turned up at the local police station and filed a complaint against Taufiq. Gradually, more people from the neighboring villages joined in, and the mob grew to over 100 people. The police were “extremely cooperative,” Rathi says. “We were assured that there will be a proper investigation into this. There were four or five more Muslim boys that had uploaded that status. As a result of the complaint, they deleted it.”

When authorities arrested Taufiq, they confiscated his phone so they could investigate who else might have circulated his post.

Shafiq bailed Taufiq out. The charges are still pending. Shafiq says his brother is scarred by what happened. “He is just 18,” Bhagwan says. “His health deteriorated quite a bit after the incident. He is still shaken because of the hostility with which he was targeted. The matter could have been resolved within the village.”

At least 13 similar cases in Maharashtra have been reported in the national media over the past four months.

Shirish Inamdar, a former deputy commissioner of police in Maharashtra’s intelligence department, says he thinks the police aren’t acting fairly, but that the cases reflect the state’s politics. Until June 2022, Maharashtra was ruled by a coalition government of three regional parties, but a year ago the BJP poached 40 of the lawmakers from one of the parties in the ruling coalition and came to power in the state. Ever since, Inamdar says, the persecution of Muslims has increased. “The local police do it to save their own skin,” he says. “The powers that be have told the police to register as many cases and vitiate the atmosphere.”

Inamdar says the cases filed against Muslims over social media posts are unlikely to succeed in a court of law. “Everybody knows that,” he says. “But the cases drag on, and it becomes a blot on the person’s record. They have to appear for court dates, they have to spend money on the lawyer. The process becomes the punishment.”

Madhav Bhandari, vice president of Maharashta BJP, defended the police, saying that “police cases over social media posts have happened under previous governments too” and that he also believes pictures of Aurangzeb “hurt religious sentiments in Maharashtra.” He adds: “Everybody is entitled to be proud of their religion.”

Prateek Waghre, policy director of the Internet Freedom Foundation, an NGO, says that this kind of campaign is a form of lateral surveillance of minorities, where people have to be constantly alert for anything that could be exploited to attack them. “It points to broader societal issues, where there aren’t too many degrees of separation between people reporting Instagram or WhatsApp updates and the ones being reported,” he says. “Many of them are on their contact lists. There is also a possibility of watch lists being maintained. It is scary.”

Since Modi became prime minister in 2014, there has been a notable increase in hate speech across the country, with Hindu nationalist groups calling for the mass rape of Muslim women and the extermination of the community. The RSS and other groups affiliated with the BJP have fueled unfounded conspiracy theories, including the “love jihad,” which alleges that Muslim men are seducing Hindu women en masse and converting them to Islam. There have been multiple incidences of assaults on minorities, and even lynchings.

“There will be people dismissing these as isolated events and saying there are only so many cases in a country of a billion people,” Waghre says. “But the ripple effect is hard to ignore and also hard to measure. It impacts people’s minds and their behavior.”

In Maharashtra, the campaign has widened the divisions between communities.

In June, police filed a case against a 14-year old Muslim boy in the central region of Maharashtra over an Instagram photograph of Aurangzeb. His parents are small farmers, and his uncle is a tailor in the village. “He is just a kid,” says the uncle, who WIRED is not identifying to protect the boy’s privacy. “He even made an apology video and promised to not do it again. He deleted his Instagram account and is scared to join back. But still a case was filed against him. We had to pay a lot of money for a bail bond in court to avoid arrest. This can potentially ruin or jeopardize his career. Is this where we want to head as a society?”

The boy’s Instagram post was reported by a young man living nearby who was working for a radical right-wing group. In the complaint, he said the photograph “hurt his religious sentiments.” The police charged the 14-year-old with “deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs” and “intention to incite offense.”

The uncle says that over four decades of living in the village, where he has developed relationships with people across communities, this is the first time he has felt exposed. “I have participated in Hindu festivals, I have very close Hindu friends,” he says. “But the politics of the state has ruined everything. Is there a ban on sharing pictures of figures from history?”

[humanrightsupdates]

(New York) – Indian authorities are revoking visa privileges to overseas critics of Indian origin who have spoken out against the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government’s policies, Human Rights Watch said today. Prime Minister Narendra Modi often attends mass gatherings of diaspora party supporters in the United States, Europe, Australia, and elsewhere to celebrate Indian democracy, while his government has targeted people it claims are “tarnishing the image” of the country.

The Overseas Citizens of India (OCI) status is available to foreign citizens of Indian origin or foreigners married to Indian nationals to obtain broad residency rights and bypass visa requirements, but does not amount to citizenship. Many of those whose OCI visa status was revoked are Indian-origin academics, activists, and journalists who have been vocal critics of the BJP’s Hindu majoritarian ideology. Some have challenged their exclusion in Indian courts on constitutional grounds seeking protection of their rights to speech and livelihood.

“Indian government reprisals against members of the diaspora who criticize the BJP’s abusive and discriminatory policies show the authorities’ growing hostility to criticism and dialogue,” said Elaine Pearson, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The authorities seem intent on expanding politically motivated repression against Indian activists and academics at home to foreign citizens of Indian origin beyond India’s borders.” (Human Rights Watch)

[samacharapp]

'It took a person with a strong heart to remove 370 from Jammu and Kashmir', said Amit Shah in Rajya Sabha | 10 big things

Amit Shah Speech in Rajya Sabha: Amit Shah said, "BJP ruled for 16 years and amended the Constitution 22 times. Whereas Congress ruled for 55 years and changed the Constitution 77 times."

Amit Shah Speech in Rajya Sabha: Union Home Minister Amit Shah is responding to the discussion on the Constitution in Rajya Sabha. During this, he fiercely targeted the Constitution Amendment 2 made during the government of Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi. Read the important points of Home Minister Amit Shah's discussion:

Amit Shah said, "This discussion will make the public realise how far the country has progressed. We went deep into this discussion. Our democracy is as deep as hell. It also became clear that whenever the public gave a mandate to a party, it either respected it or not. Discussion on the constitution is good for the young generation. The people of this country have worked to shatter the pride of many dictators in a democratic way."

'Congress kept feeding Article 370 for years'

Amit Shah said, "It took a lot of courage to remove 370 from Jammu and Kashmir. Congress has been nursing 370 for so many years. People used to say that rivers of blood will flow. Narendra Modi came to power for the second time and removed it in one go. Forget about rivers of blood, no one has the courage to even throw a pebble. Referring to Jammu and Kashmir being number one among all union territories in exports from Chenab Bridge, he said that an investment of 1 lakh 19 thousand crores has come today. They ask what happened by removing 370. Let me tell you. This has shut down your appeasement shop."

Which mantra of Ambedkar did Amit Shah give a new definition to?

Amit Shah said, "After the creation of the Constitution, Dr. Ambedkar had said after a lot of thought that no matter how good a Constitution is, it can become bad if those who are responsible for running it are not good. Similarly, no matter how bad a Constitution is, it can prove to be good if the role of those running it is positive and good. We have seen both these incidents in the 75-year period of the Constitution.

Taking a dig at Rahul Gandhi, Amit Shah said, "54-year-old youth talks in the air and says he will change the Constitution. There is a provision for this in the Constitution itself. We made 22 changes in 16 years. Both BJP and Congress made changes."

He said, "Today when we look back after 75 years, after accepting the Constitution, I want to thank Sardar Patel because due to his tireless hard work, today the country is united and standing strongly before the world."

'We made 22 amendments in 16 years, Congress changed the constitution 77 times in 55 years'

Amit Shah said, "The BJP ruled for 16 years and amended the Constitution 22 times. Congress ruled for 55 years and amended the Constitution 77 times. Both BJP and Congress made changes, but what was the purpose of the change? This shows the party's faith in the Constitution. The first amendment was made in the Constitution during the time of Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and 19A was added. This amendment was made to curtail freedom of speech and freedom of expression. Similarly, the 24th amendment was made and through this the fundamental rights of the citizens were reduced. Similarly, the Congress made many amendments in the Constitution only for its purpose."

The Union Home Minister said, "Congress does vote bank politics, we are not doing vote bank politics. Congress party has done injustice to Muslim sisters for so long by doing vote bank politics. We have given rights to Muslim mothers and sisters by ending triple talaq.

News is originally taken from: https://bit.ly/4gjgG0v

Samachar App: watch the live latest news of India and the world, business updates, cricket scores, etc. Download the Samachar App now to keep up with daily breaking news.

Like and Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

[odnewsin]

Smart India Hackathon: PM Modi focuses on out-of-the-box thinking for national and global progress

Prime Minister Narendra Modi interacted with young innovators at the Grand Finale of Smart India Hackathon 2024 on Wednesday via video conferencing.  In his address, the Prime Minister reiterated his concept of ‘Sabka Prayas’, a theme he has emphasised in his Red Fort speeches. He highlighted that India’s progress can accelerate through collective efforts, and today’s event stands as a testament…

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] British-Indian businessman Rami Ranger hit back at what he said was an unjust ruling after being stripped of his CBE (Commander of the Order of the British Empire) by the UK Forfeiture Committee. Ranger, a critic of Khalistani separatist movements, announced his decision to pursue legal action, including a judicial review and an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights. In an official statement, Ranger stated, “Today I lost my CBE for standing up against Khalistanis who wish to break up India and the BBC for producing a two-part documentary with the help of antiPrime Minister Modi guests to imply that the PM was involved in the Gujarat riots some 20 years after the riots and for which the highest court in India exonerated PM Modi.” His comments underscore his belief that the Forfeiture Committee’s decision undermines British democracy and the rule of law. Expanding on his stance, Ranger added that the decision to revoke his honour sets a troubling precedent. “The decision of the Forfeiture Committee has serious implications for all upstanding citizens, that they should not speak their mind in case they forfeit their honour for standing up against those who wish to harm us and our country,” he said. The King formally directed that Lord Ranger’s CBE should be “cancelled and annulled,” as stated in a notice published in the London Gazette. Earlier on Saturday, the Times of India reported that Ranger and Anil Bhanot, an accountant and the managing trustee of Hindu Council UK, were stripped of their honours by King Charles III. Bhanot was stripped of his OBE (Officer of the Order of the British Empire). Calling the process unfair, Ranger urged supporters to express their concerns to the Forfeiture Committee via email, emphasising that his right to freedom of speech had been violated. A spokesperson for Ranger also voiced disappointment at the decision, pointing out that Ranger had not committed any crime or broken any law, unlike most individuals who have had their honours revoked. “Lord Ranger is devastated that the CBE awarded him for his services to British business and for promoting community cohesion has been taken away. It is a sad indictment that the honours system, which is designed to empower individuals who go the extra mile and contribute a great deal to the nation, should be used to curtail the basic fundamental rights of free speech and thought process,” the spokesperson stated. The Forfeiture Committee reportedly revisited complaints against Ranger, many of which had already been addressed. These included a tweet by Ranger regarding a Southall Sikh Gurdwara Trustee, his criticism of a BBC documentary implicating Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the Gujarat riots, and an online dispute with journalist Poonam Joshi. The spokesperson highlighted that complaints originating from the US-based Sikhs for Justice group, designated as an “unlawful association” by the Indian government, were also considered by the Forfeiture Committee. The organisation’s leader had been declared a terrorist by India in 2020. Despite these origins, the Committee seemingly treated the complaints as valid without a transparent or thorough investigation. Lord Rami Ranger was recognised for his outstanding contributions to business and community cohesion, receiving a CBE (Commander of the Order of the British Empire) in 2016. In 2019, Ranger’s achievements were further acknowledged three years later when he was appointed a peer in Theresa May’s resignation honours. His spokesperson also emphasised Ranger’s significant contributions to the UK over three decades. “His business is the only company in the United Kingdom to have won an unprecedented five consecutive Queen’s Awards for Enterprise in International Trade. He has connected Britain with 130 countries through export activities, created a significant number of British jobs, and supported universities and charities with millions in donations.” Ranger has also been a staunch advocate for community cohesion.

He founded the Pakistan, India & UK Friendship Forum and the Hindu Forum Britain and chaired the British Sikh Association, promoting interfaith dialogue. His philanthropic efforts include support for charities like Combat Stress, The Prince’s Trust, and Syrian refugee initiatives. Criticism of the Forfeiture Committee’s lack of transparency was also central to the spokesperson’s remarks. They argued that the investigatory and recommendation process lacked due process and impartiality. “The absence of the commonly accepted standards of due process and fairness as reflected in the principles of natural justice under common law, including the right to be heard and the requirements for impartiality free from any agenda, need to be the subject of an urgent and comprehensive review,” the spokesperson said. The spokesperson also accused the Committee of penalising Ranger for exercising his right to free speech and revisiting complaints that had been resolved. They noted that Ranger had already apologised for his remarks, undertaken rehabilitative training, and stepped back from social media. Despite the controversy, Ranger remains committed to his work and legacy. “Lord Ranger will continue to make the significant contribution that he has over the last 30 years, which led to him originally receiving his honours,” the spokesperson affirmed. He plans to challenge the decision through all available legal avenues to vindicate himself and restore his reputation. In his statement, Ranger expressed hope that his supporters would rally behind him. “If you think I have been wronged, please express your feelings to the Forfeiture Committee,” he urged, providing the committee’s contact information for feedback. [ad_2] Source link

[news365times]

[ad_1] British-Indian businessman Rami Ranger hit back at what he said was an unjust ruling after being stripped of his CBE (Commander of the Order of the British Empire) by the UK Forfeiture Committee. Ranger, a critic of Khalistani separatist movements, announced his decision to pursue legal action, including a judicial review and an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights. In an official statement, Ranger stated, “Today I lost my CBE for standing up against Khalistanis who wish to break up India and the BBC for producing a two-part documentary with the help of antiPrime Minister Modi guests to imply that the PM was involved in the Gujarat riots some 20 years after the riots and for which the highest court in India exonerated PM Modi.” His comments underscore his belief that the Forfeiture Committee’s decision undermines British democracy and the rule of law. Expanding on his stance, Ranger added that the decision to revoke his honour sets a troubling precedent. “The decision of the Forfeiture Committee has serious implications for all upstanding citizens, that they should not speak their mind in case they forfeit their honour for standing up against those who wish to harm us and our country,” he said. The King formally directed that Lord Ranger’s CBE should be “cancelled and annulled,” as stated in a notice published in the London Gazette. Earlier on Saturday, the Times of India reported that Ranger and Anil Bhanot, an accountant and the managing trustee of Hindu Council UK, were stripped of their honours by King Charles III. Bhanot was stripped of his OBE (Officer of the Order of the British Empire). Calling the process unfair, Ranger urged supporters to express their concerns to the Forfeiture Committee via email, emphasising that his right to freedom of speech had been violated. A spokesperson for Ranger also voiced disappointment at the decision, pointing out that Ranger had not committed any crime or broken any law, unlike most individuals who have had their honours revoked. “Lord Ranger is devastated that the CBE awarded him for his services to British business and for promoting community cohesion has been taken away. It is a sad indictment that the honours system, which is designed to empower individuals who go the extra mile and contribute a great deal to the nation, should be used to curtail the basic fundamental rights of free speech and thought process,” the spokesperson stated. The Forfeiture Committee reportedly revisited complaints against Ranger, many of which had already been addressed. These included a tweet by Ranger regarding a Southall Sikh Gurdwara Trustee, his criticism of a BBC documentary implicating Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the Gujarat riots, and an online dispute with journalist Poonam Joshi. The spokesperson highlighted that complaints originating from the US-based Sikhs for Justice group, designated as an “unlawful association” by the Indian government, were also considered by the Forfeiture Committee. The organisation’s leader had been declared a terrorist by India in 2020. Despite these origins, the Committee seemingly treated the complaints as valid without a transparent or thorough investigation. Lord Rami Ranger was recognised for his outstanding contributions to business and community cohesion, receiving a CBE (Commander of the Order of the British Empire) in 2016. In 2019, Ranger’s achievements were further acknowledged three years later when he was appointed a peer in Theresa May’s resignation honours. His spokesperson also emphasised Ranger’s significant contributions to the UK over three decades. “His business is the only company in the United Kingdom to have won an unprecedented five consecutive Queen’s Awards for Enterprise in International Trade. He has connected Britain with 130 countries through export activities, created a significant number of British jobs, and supported universities and charities with millions in donations.” Ranger has also been a staunch advocate for community cohesion.

He founded the Pakistan, India & UK Friendship Forum and the Hindu Forum Britain and chaired the British Sikh Association, promoting interfaith dialogue. His philanthropic efforts include support for charities like Combat Stress, The Prince’s Trust, and Syrian refugee initiatives. Criticism of the Forfeiture Committee’s lack of transparency was also central to the spokesperson’s remarks. They argued that the investigatory and recommendation process lacked due process and impartiality. “The absence of the commonly accepted standards of due process and fairness as reflected in the principles of natural justice under common law, including the right to be heard and the requirements for impartiality free from any agenda, need to be the subject of an urgent and comprehensive review,” the spokesperson said. The spokesperson also accused the Committee of penalising Ranger for exercising his right to free speech and revisiting complaints that had been resolved. They noted that Ranger had already apologised for his remarks, undertaken rehabilitative training, and stepped back from social media. Despite the controversy, Ranger remains committed to his work and legacy. “Lord Ranger will continue to make the significant contribution that he has over the last 30 years, which led to him originally receiving his honours,” the spokesperson affirmed. He plans to challenge the decision through all available legal avenues to vindicate himself and restore his reputation. In his statement, Ranger expressed hope that his supporters would rally behind him. “If you think I have been wronged, please express your feelings to the Forfeiture Committee,” he urged, providing the committee’s contact information for feedback. [ad_2] Source link

[trendingallworldnews]

Budget 2024: Date, Time, and How to Watch Live

photo the economic times

The budget session for FY2024-25 began today, July 22, 2024, in the Parliament. This session marks the first full Budget following the re-election of the Modi government for a third term. Taxpayers are eagerly anticipating significant tax reliefs from this initial Budget of the Modi 3.0 government. Here are the details on when the Budget will be presented and how you can watch it live.

Budget 2024 Presentation

Date and Time

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman will present the Union Budget 2024 in the Parliament on July 23, 2024. This will be her seventh consecutive Budget. The Budget 2024 speech is expected to commence at 11 am on Tuesday.

What to Expect from Budget 2024

Budget 2024 is anticipated to outline the roadmap for 'Vikshit Bharat' by 2047. According to a report titled 'Union Budget 2024-25: A Bundle of Expectations!' by Mehta Equities, expectations are high. Investors are optimistic about the continuation of economic reforms under the Narendra Modi 3.0 government, which have positioned India as the world’s fastest-growing major economy.

Key Expectations

Punit Shah, Partner at Dhruva Advisors, recommends that the government introduces amendments aimed at stimulating consumer spending. Key expectations include:

Raising the tax-free income threshold

Reducing tax rates for middle-income earners

Increasing standard deductions for salaried employees

How to Watch the Budget Speech Live

You can watch Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman's Budget 2024 speech live on the following platforms:

The Economic Times website

Indian government’s official site for Union Budget:

Sansad TV

Additionally, follow the live blog on The Economic Times for real-time updates, news, reactions, and analysis of Budget 2024.

[lallulalnews]

#lallulal #lallulalnews @lallulalnews 135 मिनट; पीएम मोदी ने लोकसभा में अपना ही रिकॉर्ड तोड़ा; देखें भाषण की 25 बड़ी बातें #pmmodispeech #lallulalnews #lallulal #lallu #lallulallive #lallulalnewslive #Parliamentsession #loksabha #pmmodi #nda #18thloksabhasession #hindinews #Hindinewslive #abpnews #latestnews#livenewsstreaming #livenews #livenewshindi #newslive #hindinews #livehindinews #electionnews   #viralvideo   #pmmodi #bjp #congressparty #priyankagandhi #rahulgandhi    #aap #aapneta #delhiaap pm modi speech in parliament,pm modi parliament speech,pm modi speech,modi speech,pm modi lok sabha speech,pm modi speech today,parliament session,pm modi speech live,pm modi speech in lok sabha,parliament speech,parliament,pm modi latest speech,modi speech today,pm narendra modi speech,pm modi lok sabha speech live,rahul gandhi speech in parliament,rahul gandhi speech in parliament latest,parliament live,modi parliament speech Lallu Lal (लल्लू लाल)- हे भैया सच्ची खबर तो लल्लू लाल ही देंगे..भारत के हर कोने से चुनी गई ���बरों का संग्रह। भारत के राजनैतिक, सामाजिक और आर्थिक मुद्दों पर गहराई से जानकारी देना हमारा लक्ष्य है। हम यहाँ पर हर विषय को गहराई से देखते हैं, ताकि भारत के करोड़ों Online User के पास सही खबर मिले।

[market-news-24]

Today’s Current Affairs: PM Modi Mocks Rahul Gandhi, Predicts Congress Loss in Raebareli In a recent rally in Pratapgarh, Prime Minister Narendra Modi took a jibe at Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, hinting that the opposition front will disintegrate after the Lok Sabha election results on June 4. Without mentioning names, Modi suggested that like Amethi, Rahul Gandhi and the Congress will also face defeat in Raebareli, which is considered one of the last few party strongholds in Uttar Pradesh. The PM criticized the INDIA bloc, claiming that they will look for scapegoats when they lose and emphasized the importance of voting in shaping the country's future. The political landscape continues to heat up as the election season progresses. [ad_2] Download Latest Movies in HD Quality Downloading In 15 seconds Scroll Down to End of This Post const downloadBtn = document.getElementById('download-btn'); const timerBtn = document.getElementById('timer-btn'); const downloadLinkBtn = document.getElementById('download-link-btn'); downloadBtn.addEventListener('click', () => downloadBtn.style.display = 'none'; timerBtn.style.display = 'block'; let timeLeft = 15; const timerInterval = setInterval(() => if (timeLeft === 0) clearInterval(timerInterval); timerBtn.style.display = 'none'; downloadLinkBtn.style.display = 'inline-block'; // Add your download functionality here console.log('Download started!'); else timerBtn.textContent = `Downloading In $timeLeft seconds`; timeLeft--; , 1000); ); [ad_1] 1. Who did Prime Minister Narendra Modi mock during his rally in Uttar Pradesh? a) Rahul Gandhi b) Sonia Gandhi c) Priyanka Gandhi d) Manmohan Singh Answer: a) Rahul Gandhi 2. What date did PM Modi mention during his speech as the day when the opposition front will disintegrate? a) May 4 b) June 4 c) July 4 d) August 4 Answer: b) June 4 3. Which constituency did PM Modi mention where Rahul Gandhi and the Congress will lose? a) Amethi b) Varanasi c) Raebareli d) Lucknow Answer: c) Raebareli 4. What event did PM Modi mention as a big success of India today? a) G7 Summit b) World Cup c) G20 Summit d) Olympics Answer: c) G20 Summit [ad_2] What did PM Narendra Modi say about Rahul Gandhi and Congress in Raebareli? PM Narendra Modi said that without taking names, Rahul Gandhi and the Congress will lose in Raebareli, one of the last few party bastions in majorly saffronised Uttar Pradesh. What did PM Narendra Modi mock about Rahul Gandhi's statement? PM Narendra Modi mocked Rahul Gandhi's statement where he said that the Congress Government will transfer Rs 1 lakh to the bank account of one woman of every poor household in the country, saying the opposition front will disintegrate "khatakhat khatakhat" after June 4, the day on which the results for the Lok Sabha elections will be announced. What did PM Narendra Modi say about the development of the country before and after 2014? PM Narendra Modi mentioned that the state of the country was poor before 2014, but now India organises big events like G20 with great success and pride. He also highlighted that India leaves its Tricolour imprint on the moon today, which was unimaginable 10 years ago. What accusations did PM Narendra Modi make against the INDIA bloc? PM Narendra Modi accused the INDIA bloc of raising questions on the valour of Indian soldiers, wanting to reimpose Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir if they come to power, and the Congress of snatching OBC reservation in Karnataka and giving it to Muslims. He also criticized the SP for being silent on these matters. [ad_1] Download Movies Now Searching for Latest movies 20 seconds Sorry There is No Latest movies link found due to technical error. Please Try Again Later. function claimAirdrop() document.getElementById('claim-button').style.display = 'none';

document.getElementById('timer-container').style.display = 'block'; let countdownTimer = 20; const countdownInterval = setInterval(function() document.getElementById('countdown').textContent = countdownTimer; countdownTimer--; if (countdownTimer < 0) clearInterval(countdownInterval); document.getElementById('timer-container').style.display = 'none'; document.getElementById('sorry-button').style.display = 'block'; , 1000); [ad_2] Today's current affairs highlight Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent attack on the INDIA bloc, without naming names, during a rally in Uttar Pradesh. Modi mocked Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's promises, saying that like Amethi, Gandhi and the Congress will also lose in Raebareli – one of the remaining party strongholds in Uttar Pradesh. Modi emphasized that after the Lok Sabha election results are announced on June 4, the opposition front will disintegrate, pointing out that the INDI alliance will look for scapegoats. He also criticized the bloc for questioning the valor of Indian soldiers and their agenda to reinstate Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir. Modi accused the Congress of snatching OBC reservations in Karnataka and giving them to Muslims, aiming to change the Constitution nationwide. The Prime Minister highlighted the progress made by India under his leadership and urged voters to consider the power of their votes in shaping the country's future. [ad_1]

[malavijhani786]

PM Modi campaigns in Chhattisgarh’s Janjgir-Champa and Mahasamund

PM Modi campaigns in Chhattisgarh’s Janjgir-Champa and Mahasamund

https://nm4.in/3Us5MNs

via NaMo App

Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed two mega rallies today in Janjgir-Champa and Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. Beginning his speech, PM Modi said, "I have come to seek your abundant blessings. Our country has made significant progress in the last 10 years, but there is still much work to be done. The previous government in Chhattisgarh did not allow my work to progress here, but now that Vishnu Deo Sai is here, I must complete that work as well.”

Taking blessings from revered Acharya Mehttar Ram Ji Ramnami and Mata Set Bai Ramnami, PM Modi said, “It is said that the ancestors of the Ramnami community predicted over a century ago when the consecration of the Ram Temple would take place. The work that the BJP has done fulfils the hope of the temple in Ayodhya, which the country had left behind.”

[sampaths-manager]

PM Modi In Hoshangabad, M.P. LIVE | PM Modi LIVE | PM Modi Speech LIVE ...

Progressive elements

[divisional-news]

A Day in Indian Politics: PM Modi's Campaign, Amit Shah's Karnataka Visit, and Jagan's Yatra

Introduction: Today, the Indian political landscape is abuzz with activity as Prime Minister Narendra Modi spearheads his Lok Sabha campaign in Rajasthan and Uttarakhand, while Union Home Minister Amit Shah focuses on bridging gaps in Karnataka with the Janata Dal (Secular). Meanwhile, Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy continues his 'Memanta Siddham' tour amidst rising political tensions. Let's delve into the day's developments shaping the nation's political narrative.

PM Modi's Campaign Trail: Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to address public rallies in Rajasthan and Uttarakhand today. In Rajasthan, Modi will rally support for the Jaipur Rural Lok Sabha seat, marking his first program in the state since the announcement of polls. Following this, he will head to Uttarakhand to speak at a rally in Rudrapur. These states, where the BJP swept all seats in the last elections, hold significance in the upcoming polls, with Modi's speeches expected to underscore key themes of development, welfare schemes, and Hindutva.

Amit Shah's Karnataka Visit: Union Home Minister Amit Shah embarks on a crucial visit to Karnataka, aiming to resolve any lingering differences with the Janata Dal (Secular), the BJP's alliance partner in the state. Shah's scheduled breakfast meeting with JD(S) leaders signifies a concerted effort to ensure a cohesive approach as the elections draw near. With the BJP contesting on 25 constituencies and the JD(S) on three, the meeting holds significance in strategizing for electoral success.

Jagan's Election Campaign: Meanwhile, Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy presses on with his 'Memanta Siddham' election campaign bus tour. Amidst whispers of anti-incumbency and alliance dynamics, Jagan aims to solidify his grip on the state's political landscape. Continuing his brisk tour, Jagan will address public meetings and traverse various districts, signaling his commitment to retaining power amidst shifting political tides.

Conclusion: As the nation gears up for the Lok Sabha elections, today's political events underscore the fervent campaign efforts and strategic maneuvers shaping India's democratic process. From Modi's rallying cries in Rajasthan and Uttarakhand to Shah's diplomatic initiatives in Karnataka and Jagan's relentless yatra in Andhra Pradesh, each move reflects the dynamic interplay of power and politics. Stay tuned for more updates as the electoral journey unfolds.