#Malini Mallya

[legalwires]

Academy of General Education Manipal v. Malini Mallya

“The Supreme Court recognized the intellectual property rights of Malini Mallya over her Yakshagana performances under the Copyright Act, 1957, particularly Sections 13 and 17, affirming her as the owner of the copyright in her creative work.” Citation: AIR 2009 SC 1982 Date of Judgment: 23rd January, 2009 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: S.B. Sinha (J), Lokeshwar Singh Panta (J), B.…

[bananaipindia]

Dance's Literary and Dramatic Aspects: From Yakshagana Ballet to Yaksharanga

New Post has been published on https://www.bananaip.com/ip-news-center/dances-literary-and-dramatic-aspects-from-yakshagana-ballet-to-yaksharanga/

Dance's Literary and Dramatic Aspects: From Yakshagana Ballet to Yaksharanga

Academy of General Edu., Manipal Vs. Malini Mallya

In a case involving Yakshagana, a form of ballet dance, the Supreme Court pointed out that literary and dramatic works acquire distinctive protection under the Indian Copyright Act. It stated that script of a drama acquires protection as a literary work, and that includes dramatic literature in its fold. However, dance, choreography, scenic arrangements and other aspects of ballet like works will be considered as dramatic works. Simply put, the script of a play is copyrightable as a literary work, and the movements, acting, choreography and arrangements are protectable as dramatic works.

The case related to works of Dr. Kota Shivarama Karanth (“Dr. Karanth”), a Jnanapeeth awardee, who is known for his work in making derivative works of Yakshagana, which he called Yaksharanga. Dr. Karanth composed seven verses or prasangas for performing Yaksharanga ballet, and made several changes to the original dance form. The changes pertained to different aspects of Yakshagana such as Raga, Tala, Scenic arrangement, Costumes, and so on. While determining the scope of bequeath in Dr. Karanth’s will, the Supreme Court pointed out that both literary and dramatic works formed part of the will.

By concluding that Ms. Malini Mallya owned the copyrights in the dramatic and literary works of Yaksharanga based on Dr. Karanth’s will, the Court restrained the restrained the Appellants from performing Yaksharanga without Malini’s permission. It however stated that the restraint does not operate against any fair use or fair dealing of the dramatic works for educational and/or religious purposes.

At a general level, dance involves different works such as choreography, scenic arrangement, acting, music, recitation/dialogues, and costumes and so on, and each of them is protectable under the copyright law. While choreography, sequences, arrangements and acting are protectable as dramatic works, lyrics, dialogues and script are protectable as literary works, compositions as musical works, props, settings and costumes as artistic works, recorded music as sound recordings. A combination of protection afforded by different works provides dance a comprehensive and integrated copyright protection.

Citation: Appellants: Academy of General Edu., Maniple and Ors. Vs. Respondent: B. Malini Mallya, Decided by Supreme Court of India, MANU/SC/0146/2009.

  INTELLEPEDIA IP SEMINARS

Dancing with Intellectual Property

From dance choreography  and settings to  dance music and costumes, various aspects of dance can be protected  as intellectual property. Protecting dance sequences and moves, videos and music, sets and costumes, personality attributes and names, and social media presence can help dancers commercialise their creative work and prevent its misuse.

Aimed at dancers, this specially designed session  helps dancers understand  how to protect their  creativity and movement art. It provides insights into how their work can be commercialised, and what steps can be taken to prevent infringement of their work online and offline.

Faculty

Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala

The session will be led by  Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala, a reputed entertainment law attorney in India. He has over the years provided IP consultation and advisory services for several performers, artists, authors and musicians.

Register here – https://www.townscript.com/e/dancing-with-intellectual-property-222404

[kashishipr]

Like all other art forms, choreographic works in dance and their steps have been expressly recognized under the Copyright Laws of different jurisdictions. By such virtue, performers can have their rights protected, even though some of the most popular steps have not been claimed. Take the example of the famous ‘moonwalk dance,’ which is often accredited to Michael Jackson – it was first performed and expressed by Cab Calloway in 1930. The same stands true for the ‘walking against the wind’ dance, popularized by Bill Bailey yet not registered and claimed. Now it has become a common ‘dance routine’ or social dance step, which cannot be governed by copyright law. It is, therefore, interesting to note how an iconic or original dance step can be registered.

What is a Choreographic Work?

There is no universally accepted definition provided for the uniform application of the law on the said subject matter. It is, therefore, to be understood as it has developed from the past common usage. Simply put, choreography is the art of creating or arranging dances consisting of an original technique of dance notation. Many issues come upfront while defining the term ‘dance,’ reason being:

Since dance involves the techniques of human planned movements, it draws closer to other forms, like gymnastics, which is where a line has to be drawn.

Dance is commonly associated with music, but at the same time, there are dance forms like contemporary performances, which utilize silence while expressing the art form.

Dances are usually performed for presenting the same to an audience for recreational and social purposes, but the same cannot be confined to performances created without such intention.

There are certain dances and choreographic moves that cannot be copyrighted, which include:

Social or cultural dances;

Discrete dance movements and simple dance routines;

Ordinary motors activities and physical movements; and

Steps that are neither choreographed nor performed by mankind.

Prerequisites for Seeking Copyright Protection

Original Work: For seeking Copyright Protection, the work must be an original work of authorship. For choreography to be protected, since most dance forms are influenced by predecessors, it doesn’t preclude it from the test of originality. Despite such fact, it is imperative to note that isolated steps do not mean achievement of the element of originality since they usually constitute ideas, systems, or a modus operandi that are excluded from copyright protection. Furthermore, the registration of the ‘Carlton dance’ routine, performed in ‘The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air’ by the performer Alfonso Ribeiro, was rejected by the US Copyright Office since it was a mere combination of three different dance steps. Such a combination lacks originality and cannot be registered. As per Fiest Publication v. Rural Telephone Service, the standard of originality is based on two factors. Firstly, it should be an independent creation of the author, and secondly, the work should exhibit a certain degree of creativity.

There has to be a combination of steps. The formation of the group dancing may also contribute to making the same original. Apart from that, even the space of performing may add to its valuation – for example, the use of stairs or tightened ropes for the performance of some specific steps. The music, costumes, scenery, or lighting effects would not be accounted for while seeking such protection.

Idea and Expression Dichotomy: All ideas, procedures, processes, systems, modes of operation, etc., are excluded from the ambit of copyright protection. Therefore, even though non-verbal, the same should not depict an idea; instead, it should be a form of an expression of the same. For example, the concept of “exploration of the emotion of grief” or the “stylization of a marriage ceremony with a couple and a corps de ballet.”

Fixation of the Dance in a Tangible Medium: The dance steps choreographed have to be fixed in a tangible medium of expression from which the same can be perceived, reproduced, or even communicated directly or through the application on a device or machine. The same may be fixed on a film, videotape, or other acceptable notational systems. Notation is a more refined and detailed mode of capturing the specificity of a choreographed dance; however, the same can be costly and time-consuming. It was reported that the first dance notation submitted for registration was the choreography for the musical ‘Kiss Me Kate,’ which was accepted by the Copyright Office in the USA even though it was short and did not tell a story, as is otherwise stressed that short routines may not be registered.

In Academy of General Edu., Manipal v. Malini Mallya, it was observed by the Supreme Court that a new form of a ballet dance, which is reproduced in a literary format, shall be considered as a dramatic work. Therefore, if a person wants to register the copyright in a choreographic work, he will be required to reduce it in writing or any other form and apply for registration in that form only, stressing the need for fixation.

Why Consider Registering a Copyright?

Where a copyright is secured in the favor of the choreographer, it translates to the fact that the proprietor has the right to make copies, prepare derivative works or adaptations, distribute the same for sale, perform it, or even display it in another medium. It should be noted that the right of the performer is not inherently the same as that of the choreographer; for example, De Keersmaeker and Beyoncé were involved in a brief spat over Keersmaeker’s dance steps that were reproduced in the latter’s music video, namely, ‘Countdown.’ The rights are originally held by the former only.

Therefore, the court will ascertain a case of infringement while considering whether or not an infringing copy is substantially similar to the original. Most importantly, work in one medium (like photography) can be infringed upon by work in another medium (like sketches or paintings). The same was held in Horgan v. MacMillan, where the claim stated that photographs were infringed upon by choreography. The emphasis is paid on not the fact that the entire portion has been reproduced or not but whether the same is qualitatively significant or not. Therefore, since there is a great deal of similarity between de Keersmaeker and Beyonce’s dance, the former could have brought a case against the latter for infringement of her choreography if the same had been registered.

Copyright Registration for creative works is, although not necessary, yet is recommended since it enables easier redressal from courts. The same was stressed in Martha Graham School and Dance Foundation, Inc. v. Martha Graham Center of Contemporary Dance, Inc, where Martha, a dancer, gave all the rights in her works to a non-dancer, Ronald Protas, who waited for several years to protect the work legally through registration. The copyright office rejected the request for registration on the grounds of delay and prior publishing. Thus, it is advised to register sooner than later.

In the absence of registration, the choreographer cannot sue for infringement but can file for an order of injunction to prevent the third party from making further use of the work. It is possible to seek damages and account for profits; however, it may be an arduous task altogether.

Conclusion

The law is dynamic, and therefore, it can evolve to engulf different subject matters within itself. There is not much jurisprudence available on copyrighting choreographic works, yet, it can be easily established that registration plays a vital role in ensuring protection and imposing sanctions in case of unauthorized use. The development of appropriate jurisprudence requires the interaction of law and subject matter experts in the said domain of knowledge to understand newer trends and accommodate the same. As artists have begun to understand their rights in their works, it would be interesting to see how the domain grows. ✅ For more visit: https://www.kashishipr.com/

[aminalatif]

G N Bajpai resigns from IL&FS board

MUMBAI: G N Bajpai, a former chairman of markets regulator Sebi and a board member of the now defunct Kingfisher Airlines, resigned from the board of debt-laden IL&FS — the government-owned infrastructure financing company that has created a major crisis in the country’s debt market by multiple defaults.

On October 3, the government had set up a seven-member team to replace the earlier board of IL&FS with Bajpai as one of its members and chaired by noted banker Uday Kotak. However, soon after Bajpai’s appointment, proxy advisory firms had red-flagged the government’s decision citing conflict of interest during his association with Kingfisher Airlines.

On October 4, TOI had reported that in addition to the Vijay Mallya-promoted Kingfisher Airlines, Bajpai was also associated with MCX-SX (now Metropolitan Stock Exchange) — a sister concern of defunct National Spot Exchange (NSEL) that is also being investigated by agencies.

The government’s Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) had looked into alleged financial irregularities in Kingfisher Airlines, on which Bajpai was an independent director. His appointment to the IL&FS board, despite his association with the two entities that were investigated, raised several eyebrows.

Bajpai’s resignation will be effective from October 30, a release from IL&FS said. There are six members remaining on the IL&FS board. Along with Kotak, there are ICICI Bank chairman G C Chaturvedi, IAS officer and director general of shipping Malini Shankar, Vineet Nayyar of Mahindra group, veteran auditor Nandkishore, and former chief secretary of Rajasthan C S Rajan.

In an unrelated development, IL&FS Transportation said on Thursday it had defaulted on interest payment worth Rs 2.3 crore on non-convertible debentures. It also said Neeru Singh, an independent director, had resigned from its board.

The post G N Bajpai resigns from IL&FS board appeared first on Watch Online Pakistani Dramas.

from Watch Online Pakistani Dramas https://ift.tt/2PCPpwP via IFTTT