#Lockheed Missiles & Space Company | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

wildmonkeysects · 1 year ago

Text

War Profiteers

Remember President Dwight “Ike” Eisenhower, who after green-lighting the overthrow of Iran’s democracy in 1953 at the behest of petrochemical corporations, had a change of heart and warned about the Military Industrial Complex? Here are the top 100 USA Military Industrial Complex “defense” contractors, all corporate welfare queens mooching off the public, who have blood on their hands in Palestine and elsewhere:

Academi

Action Target

ADT Corporation

Advanced Armament Corporation

AECOM

Aerospace Corporation

Aerovironment

AirScan

AM General

American Petroleum Institute

Argon ST

ARINC

Artis

Assett

Astronautics Corporation of America

Atec

Aurora Flight Sciences

Axon Enterprise

United Kingdom BAE Systems

BAE Systems Inc

Ball Corporation

Ball Aerospace & Technologies

Barrett Firearms Manufacturing

Battelle Memorial Institute

Bechtel

Berico Technologies

Boeing Defense, Space & Security

Booz Allen Hamilton

Boston Dynamics

Bravo Strategic

CACI

Carlyle Group

Carnegie Mellon University

Ceradyne

Cloudera

Colt Defense

The Columbia Group

Computer Sciences Corporation

Concurrent Technologies Corporation

CSRA (IT services company)

Cubic Corporation

Omega Training Group

Curtiss-Wright

DeciBel Research

Dillon Aero

Dine Development Corporation

Draper Laboratories

DRS Technologies

DynCorp

Edison Welding Institute

[Israei]l Elbit Systems

M7 Aerospace

Ensco

United Kingdom/Military contractor Ernst & Young

Evergreen International Aviation

Exxon

Fluor Corporation

Force Protection Inc

Foster-Miller

Foster Wheeler

Franklin Armoury

General Atomics

General Dynamics

Bath Iron Works

General Dynamics Electric Boat

Gulfstream

Vangent

General Electric Military Jet Engines Division

Halliburton Corporation

Health Net

Hewlett-Packard

Honeywell

Humana Inc.

Huntington Ingalls Industries

Hybricon Corporation

IBM

Insight Technology

Intelsat

International Resources Group

iRobot

ITT Exelis

Jacobs Engineering Group

JANUS Research Group

Johns Hopkins University

Kaman Aircraft

KBR

Kearfott Corporation

Knight's Armament Company

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions

L3Harris Technologies

Aerojet

Brashear

[France] Lafayette Praetorian Group

Lake Shore Systems

Leidos

EOTech

Lewis Machine & Tool Company

Lockheed Martin

Gyrocam Systems

Sikorsky

LRAD Corporation

ManTech International

Maxar Technologies

McQ

Microsoft

Mission Essential Personnel

Motorola

Natel Electronic Manufacturing Services

Navistar Defense

Nextel

Northrop Grumman

Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems

Northrop Grumman Ship Systems

Northrop Grumman Technical Services

Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems

NOVA

Oceaneering International

Olin Corporation; also see John M. Olin and John M. Olin Foundation

Oshkosh Corporation

Para-Ordnance

Perot Systems

Picatinny Arsenal

Pinnacle Armor

Precision Castparts Corporation

Raytheon Technologies

Collins Aerospace

Rockwell Collins

Goodrich Corporation

Pratt & Whitney

Raytheon Intelligence & Space

Raytheon Missiles & Defense

Raytheon BBN

Remington Arms

Rock Island Arsenal

Roundhill Group

Ruger

Saab Sensis

Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)

SGIS

Sierra Nevada Corporation

Smith & Wesson

Smith Enterprise (SEI)

SPRATA

Springfield Armory

SRC Inc

SRI International

Stanley

Stewart & Stevenson

Swift Engineering

Tactical Air Support

Teledyne

Teledyne FLIR

Textron

AAI Corporation

Bell Helicopter Textron

Trijicon

TriWest Healthcare Alliance

Unisys

U.S. Ordnance

Verizon Communications

Vinnell Corporation

Westinghouse Electric Corporation

#war #foodie #foodblog #travel #vacation #travel photography #travel blog

8 notes · View notes

usafphantom2 · 1 year ago

Text

General Atomics guarantees DARPA contract for LongShot air-to-air combat drone

Fernando Valduga By Fernando Valduga 09/09/2023 - 20:02in Military, UAV - UAV

General Atomics Aeronautical Systems (GA-ASI) secured the DARPA LongShot program, with the aim of developing a drone equipped with air-to-air missiles, launchable and controllable by fighters and bombers.

DARPA considers LongShot, an innovative system of unmanned aircraft, usable from bombers or fighters with its missile launch capability, valuable for both the Air Force and the Navy.

In June, GA-ASI received a Phase 3 contract from DARPA for its LongShot initiative, potentially valued at up to $94 million. The company plans to reveal the new design of the drone at an upcoming conference of the Air and Space Forces Association.

General Atomics was competitively selected in 2020 to develop the DARPA concept for disruptive air combat operations, with the aim of increasing the reach of engagement and mission effectiveness for current 4 generation fighters and air-to-air missiles.

DARPA revealed the recipients of its initial LongShot contracts, which had actually started the previous year, with General Atomics, Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman being the chosen companies.

Artistic design of LongShot in 2021.

Flight tests of this drone are expected to begin by the end of the year, validating its basic handling characteristics and paving the way for additional development and testing.

The new design of the drone features an elongated fuselage, small front canards, rear-facing main wings and an inverted V-shaped double tail configuration. It appears to have implantable main wings and carries an advanced medium-range air-to-air missile AIM-120 (AMRAAM).

DARPA's budget proposal for fiscal year 2024 describes LongShot as an air-launched UAV capable of hitting multiple targets from distances out of sight, using existing air-to-air missiles. It can be deployed externally from existing fighters or internally from bombers and addresses stability and control challenges in the launch of air-to-air missiles from a relatively small UAV in operational scenarios.

DARPA is requesting more than $44 million for LongShot in fiscal year 2024, above the $36 million allocated in the previous fiscal cycle.

Tags: Military AviationDARPADronesGA-ASIGeneral AtomicsLongShot

Sharing

Fernando Valduga

Aviation photographer and pilot since 1992, he has participated in several events and air operations, such as Cruzex, AirVenture, Daytona Airshow and FIDAE. He has work published in specialized aviation magazines in Brazil and abroad. Uses Canon equipment during his photographic work throughout the world of aviation.

Related news

MILITARY

Argentina will strengthen naval surveillance with the acquisition of P-3 Orion aircraft from Norway

09/09/2023 - 18:52

WAR ZONES

Belgian defender says his F-16s are “too worn out” to donate to Ukraine

08/09/2023 - 19:41

MILITARY

BAE Systems tests on the F-35 its next generation of vehicle management computer

08/09/2023 - 16:00

SAAB

Saab opens new radar production plant in the United Kingdom

08/09/2023 - 15:00

MILITARY

RNLAF expands use of Elbit Systems' DIRCM for VIP aircraft

08/09/2023 - 14:00

Three of the six F-35A fighters of the Royal Australian Air Force en route to Japan, where they will participate in the joint exercise Bushido Guardian. (Photo: Australian DoD)

MILITARY

Exercise Bushido Guardian brings together Japan and Australia

08/09/2023 - 12:00

5 notes · View notes

harrelltut · 2 years ago

Text

HIM [MICHAEL] Took Over ALL GLOBAL Airwave Coordinate Compu_TAH [PTAH] Systems @ QUANTUM HARRELL TECH [QHT] LOCKHEED of SIRIUS CLOUD AERONAUTICS [CA]

IMMORTAL U.S. MILITARY KING SOLOMON-MICHAEL HARRELL, JR.™

ommmmm

him [michael] gen x of lockheed

eye fly higher than Lockheed

black sky military budget elites

him [michael] cloud computing at quantum harrell tech's [qht's] clandestine lockheed missile & space company

automation autocad technologies

him [michael] automating autocad since 1985

ptah technology predate mankind

eye bee machine [ibm] learning in the cloud computing for enterprise architects of ancient intel [a.i.]

heil harrell!!!

eye original programmer & coder of ancient quantum computing

quantum harrell tech [qht] @ the department of defense [dod]

#om #o michael #quantumharrelltech #harrelltut #bye america #hitlah #dod #department of defense #9etherpentagonelites #autocad #lockheed #ptah tech

2 notes · View notes

newsmarketreports · 2 months ago

Text

Lockheed Martin Corporation: Global Locations and Strategic Footprint

Lockheed Martin Corporation is a global leader in aerospace, defense, and security, with a vast network of facilities and operations that extend across the world. As one of the largest defense contractors, Lockheed Martin’s strategic presence enables it to support its diverse portfolio of projects and maintain strong partnerships with government entities, militaries, and defense organizations.

Global Overview of Lockheed Martin's Operations

Lockheed Martin operates across more than 50 countries, providing cutting-edge solutions in aerospace, cyber technology, advanced electronics, and more. The company’s global locations are critical to its ability to deliver advanced defense systems and technologies to clients worldwide. These locations serve as hubs for research and development (R&D), manufacturing, testing, and support services.

1. United States: Core of Operations

The U.S. remains the heart of Lockheed Martin's operations, with numerous facilities spread across the country. The company is headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, and has significant manufacturing, R&D, and operational sites in key states.

Fort Worth, Texas: Home to the production of the F-35 Lightning II, one of Lockheed’s most advanced fighter jets. This location plays a critical role in the company's aerospace manufacturing.

Sunnyvale, California: A major site for space systems development, including satellite technology and advanced missile defense systems.

Orlando, Florida: Focuses on simulation and training systems, providing sophisticated tools for defense personnel training.

Denver, Colorado: Specializes in space exploration technologies, including contributions to NASA's programs and commercial space ventures.

2. International Presence

Lockheed Martin’s global reach extends well beyond the United States, with key operations in several international markets.

Europe

United Kingdom: Lockheed Martin UK is a critical hub for advanced defense systems and aerospace technology. Major locations include sites in London and Havant, which focus on military systems integration and advanced engineering.

Germany: A strong presence in space technology and satellite systems. Lockheed collaborates with European partners to support space exploration and defense projects.

Italy: A partner in the F-35 fighter program, Italy contributes to production and maintenance at facilities in Cameri, strengthening the European defense network.

Middle East

United Arab Emirates: Lockheed Martin has a strategic partnership with the UAE, focusing on aerospace technology and missile defense systems. The company supports the nation’s defense needs through training, logistics, and advanced military systems.

Saudi Arabia: Lockheed provides integrated defense systems and advanced military solutions to the Kingdom, including radar technology and missile defense capabilities.

Asia-Pacific

Australia: Lockheed Martin Australia works closely with the government on defense projects such as the Aegis Combat System and F-35 aircraft programs. The company has facilities in Canberra and Melbourne, which support regional defense and aerospace activities.

Japan: A key partner in missile defense and aerospace systems, Lockheed collaborates with Japanese industry leaders to enhance national security through high-tech solutions.

South Korea: Another critical market where Lockheed supports defense initiatives, particularly in missile defense and advanced aircraft systems.

Canada

Lockheed Martin Canada plays a vital role in maritime defense, developing cutting-edge naval systems and supporting the country’s military with state-of-the-art technology. The company operates facilities in Halifax and Ottawa that focus on systems integration and defense solutions.

Strategic Importance of Lockheed Martin's Global Locations

Lockheed Martin’s broad geographic footprint enables the company to:

Support National Security: With operations in key regions, Lockheed is able to provide immediate support and localized services for defense needs across the globe.

Foster International Partnerships: Collaboration with foreign governments and defense organizations ensures Lockheed Martin remains a trusted partner in global defense.

Advance Technological Innovation: With R&D centers in multiple countries, Lockheed Martin continues to push the boundaries of innovation in aerospace, cyber, and defense technologies.

Impact on Local Economies

Lockheed Martin’s presence in numerous countries contributes to job creation and economic growth. The company employs thousands of engineers, scientists, and defense experts globally, and its operations spur growth in local supply chains and technology industries.

1. Job Creation

U.S.: Lockheed Martin employs over 100,000 people across its U.S. locations, contributing significantly to local economies, particularly in defense-heavy states such as Texas, California, and Maryland.

Global Workforce: The company has thousands of employees internationally, ensuring local expertise in global markets.

2. Investment in Local Communities

Lockheed Martin invests in education, training, and development programs across its global locations to cultivate the next generation of innovators. This includes partnerships with universities, research institutes, and local governments.

Future Expansion Plans

As global defense needs evolve, Lockheed Martin plans to expand its presence in emerging markets:

Southeast Asia and Africa are becoming strategic regions for future growth, where increasing defense budgets and regional instability highlight the need for advanced military systems.

Space Technology Expansion: Lockheed continues to increase its focus on space exploration and defense, expanding its global R&D footprint to address growing demand for satellite systems and space-based defense technologies.

Conclusion

Lockheed Martin’s expansive network of global locations is a testament to its commitment to providing innovative defense and aerospace solutions worldwide. From advanced military systems to cutting-edge space exploration technologies, Lockheed’s strategic footprint ensures it remains a leader in the defense industry, delivering value to its global partners and contributing to local economies.

0 notes

shubhampawrainfinium · 2 months ago

Text

Light Speed Combat: The Breakthrough in Directed Energy Weapons

The global directed energy weapons (DEW) market is experiencing rapid growth, fueled by advancements in military technology and increasing defense budgets worldwide. According to the report, the market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of over 20% during the forecast period of 2022-2028. The revenue generated by the directed energy weapons market was nearly USD 5 billion in 2022 and is expected to reach over USD 15 billion by 2028.

What Are Directed Energy Weapons?

Directed energy weapons use focused energy in the form of lasers, microwaves, or particle beams to damage or disable targets. These systems are designed for various military applications, including air defense, missile interception, and anti-drone capabilities. DEWs offer several advantages, such as precision targeting, reduced collateral damage, and lower operational costs compared to traditional munitions.

Get Sample pages of Report: https://www.infiniumglobalresearch.com/reports/sample-request/1099

Market Dynamics and Growth Drivers

Several key factors are driving the growth of the global directed energy weapons market:

Increasing Defense Expenditure: Nations are significantly increasing their defense budgets to enhance military capabilities, particularly in response to evolving security threats. This rise in expenditure is directly benefiting the directed energy weapons market.

Technological Advancements: Continuous innovations in DEW technology, including improvements in energy efficiency, range, and targeting accuracy, are making these systems more viable for military applications. Research and development efforts are focused on miniaturization and integration with existing defense systems.

Growing Demand for Non-Lethal Weapons: As militaries seek to reduce collateral damage and civilian casualties, there is a rising interest in non-lethal directed energy weapons. These systems are effective for crowd control and other non-combat situations.

Increased Focus on Countermeasures: The proliferation of advanced threats, such as drones and hypersonic missiles, is driving the demand for effective countermeasures, including directed energy weapons that can intercept or neutralize these threats.

Regional Analysis

North America: The North American market is at the forefront of directed energy weapon development, primarily driven by significant investments from the U.S. Department of Defense. Ongoing projects and research initiatives support the advancement of DEW technologies.

Europe: Europe is increasingly focusing on directed energy weapons as part of its defense strategy, with several nations investing in research and collaborative projects to develop these capabilities.

Asia-Pacific: The Asia-Pacific region is witnessing rapid growth in the directed energy weapons market, driven by increasing military modernization efforts and regional security challenges. Countries like China, India, and Japan are key players in this space.

Middle East and Africa: These regions are gradually adopting directed energy weapons, with a focus on enhancing defense capabilities in response to regional conflicts and security threats.

Competitive Landscape

The directed energy weapons market is competitive, with several key players and emerging companies. Key players include:

Raytheon Technologies: A leading defense contractor with significant investments in directed energy systems, focusing on laser weapon systems for various applications.

Lockheed Martin: Known for its advanced directed energy weapon technologies, including high-energy lasers for missile defense and air defense systems.

Northrop Grumman: Develops a range of directed energy weapons and systems, emphasizing innovation and integration with existing defense platforms.

Boeing: Engages in research and development of directed energy weapons, offering advanced solutions for military applications.

Leonardo S.p.A.: A prominent player in the European defense market, developing directed energy systems for air and naval forces.

Report Overview : https://www.infiniumglobalresearch.com/reports/global-directed-energy-weapons-market

Challenges and Opportunities

The directed energy weapons market faces challenges such as high development costs and the need for extensive testing and validation before deployment. Additionally, regulatory and ethical considerations surrounding the use of directed energy systems can impact market dynamics.

However, significant opportunities exist for growth. The increasing focus on military modernization, advancements in technology, and rising demand for non-lethal options present avenues for expansion. Companies that invest in research and development, foster partnerships with defense organizations, and prioritize innovative solutions are well-positioned to capitalize on the growing demand for directed energy weapons.

Conclusion

The global directed energy weapons market is poised for substantial growth, driven by increasing defense expenditures, technological advancements, and a focus on countermeasures for emerging threats. With revenue expected to reach over USD 15 billion by 2028, the market offers significant opportunities for innovation and investment. As military needs evolve, directed energy weapons will play a crucial role in shaping the future of defense technology.

0 notes

commercialfinancenow · 4 months ago

Text

Aerospace and Department of Defense (DoD) Engineering | Finance Facts

Aerospace and Department of Defense (DoD) engineering are critical sectors of national security and technological advancement. They involve complex systems, cutting-edge technology, and substantial financial investments. As these industries evolve, so do the financial mechanisms supporting them, especially in commercial financing. This discussion explores the intersection of aerospace and DoD engineering with commercial financing, covering various aspects, including funding mechanisms, financial challenges, opportunities, and the influence of government policies and global trends.

1. The Aerospace and Defense Industry Overview

1.1 Aerospace Engineering

Aerospace engineering involves designing, developing, testing, and producing aircraft, spacecraft, satellites, and related systems and equipment. This highly specialized field requires aerodynamics, materials science, propulsion, avionics, and software engineering expertise. The aerospace sector is divided into two main segments: civil (commercial) aviation and military (defence) aviation.

Civil Aviation: Involves the development of commercial airplanes, private jets, and urban air mobility vehicles. Companies like Boeing and Airbus dominate this sector, focusing on passenger aircraft, cargo planes, and increasingly unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and electric aircraft.

Military Aviation focuses on developing fighter jets, bombers, reconnaissance aircraft, and drones for defence. Significant players include Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon, which are heavily involved in aerospace and defence.

1.2 Department of Defense (DoD) Engineering

DoD engineering encompasses developing and maintaining military technologies and systems. This includes everything from weapons systems and combat vehicles to communication networks and cybersecurity infrastructure. Engineering efforts in this sector are geared towards ensuring national security and maintaining military superiority.

Weapons and Combat Systems: This includes the development of advanced missiles, naval ships, and ground combat vehicles. Engineering efforts focus on enhancing capabilities, increasing accuracy, and integrating advanced technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML).

Cybersecurity and Communication: This engineering area ensures that military communications are secure and resilient against cyber threats. As digital warfare evolves, it is becoming increasingly important.

Space and Satellite Systems: This includes engineering satellites for communication, reconnaissance, and navigation. The DoD collaborates with NASA and private companies like SpaceX on space missions and satellite launches.

2. Commercial Financing in Aerospace and DoD Engineering

2.1 The Role of Commercial Financing

Commercial financing in aerospace and DoD engineering involves private sector entities providing funds to support developing, producing, and procuring aerospace and defence technologies. These funds can come from various sources, including banks, private equity firms, venture capital, and bond markets. Financing is critical for sustaining innovation, scaling production, and ensuring that companies can meet the demands of both the civilian and military markets.

2.2 Key Financing Mechanisms

Several financing mechanisms are prevalent in the aerospace and DoD sectors, each with its unique characteristics and implications:

Debt Financing involves borrowing funds that must be repaid with interest. This can include loans from banks, the issuance of corporate bonds, or credit facilities. Debt financing is typical in large aerospace companies, which use it to fund capital-intensive projects like developing new aircraft models or constructing manufacturing facilities.

Equity Financing involves raising capital by selling company shares. It is common in startups and smaller firms in the aerospace sector, particularly those focused on innovative technologies like UAVs or space exploration. Equity financing can come from venture capital, private equity, or public markets through an Initial Public Offering (IPO).

Government Contracts and Grants: The DoD provides significant funding to private companies engaged in defense-related R&D and production through contracts and grants. These contracts are often long-term and can include cost-plus arrangements, where the government reimburses all costs and adds a profit margin.

Export Credit Agencies (ECAs): ECAs, like the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), provide financing and insurance to help aerospace companies sell their products overseas. This is particularly important for commercial aircraft manufacturers who rely on international sales.

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) Involve collaboration between the government and private companies to finance large projects, such as developing new military technologies or constructing defence infrastructure.

3. Financial Challenges in Aerospace and DoD Engineering

3.1 High Capital Requirements

The aerospace and defence sectors are capital-intensive, requiring substantial upfront investments in R&D, testing, and production. Developing a new aircraft or weapon system can take years and billions of dollars before any return on investment is realized, creating a significant financial burden, especially for smaller companies or startups.

3.2 Long Development Cycles

The development cycles for aerospace and defence projects are often long, sometimes spanning decades. Companies must manage cash flow over extended periods while awaiting revenue from completed contracts or product sales. Long development cycles also expose companies to the risk of technological obsolescence or changes in market demand.

3.3 Regulatory and Compliance Costs

The aerospace and defence industries are heavily regulated, with strict compliance requirements related to safety, security, and export controls. Meeting these regulations can be costly and time-consuming, particularly for smaller companies with limited resources. Compliance costs can also impact profitability and create barriers to entry for new players.

3.4 Geopolitical Risks

Aerospace and defence companies operate in a highly geopolitical environment. Changes in government policies, international relations, or defence spending priorities can significantly impact the industry. For example, defence budgets may be cut due to shifting priorities, or international sanctions could restrict the sale of aerospace products to certain countries.

3.5 Technological Risks

The rapid pace of technological advancement in aerospace and defence poses opportunities and risks. Companies must continually invest in R&D to stay ahead of competitors and meet the evolving needs of the military and commercial markets. However, the high cost of R&D and the uncertainty of technological success can pose significant financial risks.

4. Opportunities in Aerospace and DoD Engineering Financing

4.1 Emerging Technologies

Emerging technologies like AI, ML, quantum computing, and hypersonic flight offer significant opportunities for growth in the aerospace and defence sectors. Companies that successfully develop and commercialize these technologies can attract substantial investment from venture capital and private equity firms. For example, startups working on AI-driven drones or hypersonic missiles will likely attract funding due to their potential to revolutionize warfare and commercial aviation.

4.2 Space Exploration and Commercialization

The commercialization of space is a rapidly growing sector, with private companies like SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Rocket Lab leading the way. The demand for satellite launches, space tourism, and exploration missions is driving significant investment in space-related technologies. This trend presents opportunities for aerospace companies to secure financing for space projects through equity investment, joint ventures, or government contracts.

4.3 Increased Defense Spending

Global defence spending has risen, driven by geopolitical tensions and the need to modernize military forces. This increase in defence budgets creates opportunities for aerospace and defence companies to secure contracts for new projects. Companies offering innovative solutions, such as advanced cybersecurity systems or next-generation aircraft, will likely benefit from increased government spending.

4.4 Public-Private Partnerships

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are becoming increasingly common in the aerospace and defence sectors, particularly for large-scale projects like infrastructure development or the production of military equipment. PPPs allow companies to leverage government funding and resources while sharing the financial risk. These partnerships can also facilitate the transfer of technology and expertise between the public and private sectors.

4.5 Sustainable Aviation

The push for sustainability is driving innovation in the aerospace sector, with a focus on developing cleaner and more efficient aircraft. Companies that invest in sustainable aviation technologies, such as electric or hybrid-electric propulsion systems, are likely to attract funding from both public and private sources. Governments and international organizations are also offering incentives and grants for companies working on green aviation solutions.

5. Government Policies and Regulations

5.1 Impact of Defense Budget Policies

Government defence budgets are critical to the financial health of the aerospace and defence sectors. Changes in budget allocations, such as increases in funding for certain projects or cuts to specific programs, can significantly impact companies' financial planning and operations. For example, shifting focus from traditional military hardware to cybersecurity or space defence could redirect investment and resources within the industry.

5.2 Export Controls and International Trade

Export controls and international trade policies are crucial in the aerospace and defence industries. Regulations like the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) in the U.S. govern the export of defence-related technologies and products. Compliance with these regulations is essential for companies seeking to enter international markets. Still, it can also create challenges, particularly for smaller firms with limited resources.

5.3 Government Support Programs

Governments often provide financial support to the aerospace and defence industries through various programs, such as grants, tax incentives, and loan guarantees. These programs are designed to promote innovation, support R&D efforts, and ensure the competitiveness of domestic industries on the global stage. For example, the U.S. government has historically provided significant funding for aerospace research through agencies like NASA and the Department of Defense.

5.4 International Cooperation and Alliances

International cooperation and alliances, such as NATO, significantly shape the aerospace and defence industries. Joint development programs like the F-35 fighter jet program involve collaboration between multiple countries and companies, sharing the financial burden and risks associated with large-scale defence projects. These alliances also facilitate the transfer of technology and expertise across borders.

6. Global Trends and Their Impact on Financing

6.1 The Rise of Commercial Space Ventures

The commercialization of space is one of the most significant trends impacting the aerospace sector. Companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin have demonstrated the viability of private space exploration, attracting substantial investment from venture capital and private equity firms. The growing interest in space tourism, satellite deployment, and asteroid mining presents new opportunities for financing space-related projects.

6.2 Digital Transformation

The aerospace and defence industries are transforming digitally by adopting technologies like AI, ML, big data, and the Internet of Things (IoT). These technologies are integrated into everything from aircraft design to battlefield management systems, driving demand for new skills and capabilities. Companies that invest in digital transformation are likely to attract financing from investors looking to capitalize on the shift towards a more connected and data-driven industry.

6.3 Sustainability and Green Technologies

Sustainability is becoming increasingly important in the aerospace industry, driven by regulatory requirements and growing consumer demand for environmentally friendly products. The development of sustainable aviation technologies, such as electric and hybrid-electric aircraft, is attracting significant investment. Companies that demonstrate a commitment to sustainability will likely benefit from increased access to financing and potential government incentives.

6.4 Geopolitical Shifts

Geopolitical shifts, such as China's rise as a global superpower, the ongoing tensions between the U.S. and Russia, and tertiary Middle Eastern concerns, impact the aerospace and defence industries. These shifts influence defence spending priorities, international alliances, and trade policies, which have financial implications for companies operating in these sectors. For example, increased defence spending in response to perceived threats can lead to more contracts and financing opportunities for defence contractors.

F-22 short dirt field landing.

7. Case Studies

7.1 SpaceX and Private Financing

SpaceX is a prime example of a company successfully leveraging private financing to disrupt the aerospace industry. Founded by Elon Musk in 2002, SpaceX has raised billions of dollars in funding from venture capital, private equity, and government contracts. The company's success in developing reusable rockets and reducing the cost of space travel has attracted significant investment, making it one of the most valuable private companies in the world. SpaceX's financing strategy includes equity funding, debt financing, and revenue from government contracts, allowing it to continue investing in ambitious projects like the Starship rocket and Mars colonization.

7.2 Lockheed Martin and Defense Contracting

Lockheed Martin is a leading defence contractor that has secured billions of dollars in government contracts for projects like the F-35 fighter jet and missile defence systems. The company's financial strategy strongly focuses on ensuring long-term agreements with the U.S. government and its allies, providing a stable revenue stream and reducing financial risk. Lockheed Martin invests heavily in R&D to maintain its competitive edge in the defence industry. The company's ability to secure financing through government contracts, combined with its focus on innovation, has enabled it to remain a dominant player in the aerospace and defence sectors.

7.3 Boeing and the 737 MAX Crisis

Boeing's experience with the 737 MAX crisis highlights aerospace companies' financial challenges. The grounding of the 737 MAX following two fatal crashes led to significant economic losses for Boeing, including lost revenue, compensation payments, and legal costs. The crisis also affected Boeing's ability to secure financing, as its credit rating was downgraded, and investors became more cautious. Boeing responded by securing a $13 billion loan from a group of banks to help it weather the crisis and continue its operations. This case underscores the importance of risk management and the potential financial impact of safety and regulatory issues in the aerospace industry.

Conclusion

The intersection of aerospace and Department of Defense engineering with commercial financing is a complex and dynamic area crucial to advancing technology and national security. The aerospace and defence industries require substantial financial investments supported by various mechanisms, including debt and equity financing, government contracts, and public-private partnerships. While these industries face significant economic challenges, such as high capital requirements, long development cycles, and regulatory costs, they also present numerous opportunities for growth and innovation.

Emerging technologies, the commercialization of space, increased defence spending, and the push for sustainability are driving new investment opportunities in these sectors. However, companies must navigate a rapidly changing landscape influenced by geopolitical shifts, digital transformation, and evolving government policies. Those who can successfully manage these challenges and capitalize on new opportunities will be well-positioned to secure the financing needed to drive future growth and innovation in aerospace and defence engineering.

Using a commercial financing broker for Aerospace and Department of Defense (DoD) engineering contracts can be highly advantageous for companies navigating these complex, capital-intensive industries. A skilled broker can connect businesses with specialized lenders who understand the unique risks and opportunities in aerospace and defence, including long development cycles, regulatory compliance, and government contract intricacies. Brokers can secure tailored financing solutions, such as debt facilities, equity investments, or structured finance, that align with the specific needs of aerospace projects or defence contracts.

We also offer valuable insights into market trends, helping companies optimize their financial strategies and leverage opportunities like public-private partnerships or export credit agencies. By engaging a commercial financing broker, aerospace and defence companies can access the necessary capital to drive innovation, meet contract obligations, and maintain a competitive advantage in these highly specialized sectors.

Commercial Financing Now ® is a Money Service Business (MSB) operating as a Non-Bank Financial Institution (NBFI) that abides by Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Regulations. These policies and procedures are internally published and meet reporting requirements while considering sanctions screening and transactional monitoring.

Commercial Finance Now does not provide tax, legal, or accounting advice. This post has been drafted for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, tax, legal, or accounting advice. You should consult your tax, legal, and accounting advisors before considering any tax treatments.

0 notes

sanjeev3214 · 5 months ago

Text

Global Aviation Market Share, Trends, Growth and Forecast 2029

The aviation market is projected to grow from USD 333.96 billion in 2024 to USD 396.15 billion by 2029. Despite setbacks from the COVID-19 pandemic, the industry is rebounding, driven by increased demand for air travel and cargo services.

Segmentation in the Aviation Sector

The aviation market is a diverse landscape comprising various segments catering to different needs and preferences within the industry. Understanding these segments is crucial for stakeholders to effectively target their audience and capitalize on emerging opportunities.

Commercial Aviation

Full-Service Carriers: Airlines offering a wide range of services, including meals, entertainment, and checked baggage, typically targeting business and leisure travellers.

Low-Cost Carriers (LCCs): Airlines focusing on affordable air travel with no-frills services, appealing to budget-conscious travellers.

Cargo Aviation

Integrated Carriers: Companies operating their own fleet of cargo aircraft and providing end-to-end logistics solutions, often combining air, ground, and sea transportation services.

Dedicated Freight Operators: Airlines exclusively dedicated to transporting cargo, offering specialized services tailored to the needs of freight customers.

General Aviation

Business Aviation: Aircraft used for corporate travel, executive transportation, and charter services, catering to business executives, high-net-worth individuals, and government officials.

Personal Aviation: Aircraft used for personal and recreational purposes, such as private flying clubs, flight training, and sightseeing tours.

Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) Services

Airframe Maintenance: Inspection, repair, and modification of aircraft structures and components to maintain structural integrity and safety.

Engine Maintenance: Overhaul, repair, and testing of aircraft engines to ensure optimal performance and reliability.

Major Players in the Aviation Market

Airbus SE: A leading manufacturer of commercial aircraft, helicopters, and defence systems, known for innovative designs like the A320, A330, A350, and A380.

The Boeing Company: Renowned for iconic aircraft models such as the 737, 747, 777, and 787 Dreamliner, Boeing specializes in commercial and military aircraft and aerospace products.

Lockheed Martin Corporation: A global aerospace and defence company manufacturing military aircraft, missiles, and space systems, including the F-35 Lightning II fighter jet and C-130 Hercules transport aircraft.

Embraer S.A.: A Brazilian company specializing in commercial, executive, and military aircraft, leading the regional jet market with models like the E-Jet series and the Phenom executive jet series.

Opportunities and Challenges in the Aviation Market

Opportunities

Technological Advancements: Rapid advancements in aircraft design, propulsion systems, and avionics offer opportunities for enhancing aircraft performance, fuel efficiency, and safety through research and development (R&D).

Market Expansion in Emerging Economies: Emerging economies in Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Africa present significant growth opportunities due to rising disposable incomes, urbanization, and a growing middle class driving increased air travel demand.

Cargo Transportation Growth: The e-commerce boom and globalization of trade have fuelled the demand for air cargo services. Airlines and cargo carriers can invest in freighter aircraft, cargo handling facilities, and digitalization initiatives to streamline operations and meet the growing demand for air cargo services.

Challenges

Volatility in Fuel Prices: Fluctuations in oil prices impact airline operating costs, affecting profitability and financial stability. Sudden spikes in fuel prices can significantly inflate operating expenses.

Regulatory Compliance and Safety: The aviation industry is highly regulated, with stringent safety standards and compliance requirements imposed by bodies such as the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).

Infrastructure Constraints: Airport capacity limitations, airspace congestion, and inadequate ground facilities pose significant challenges. Growing passenger demand, especially in congested urban areas and major travel hubs, strains existing infrastructure and air traffic management systems.

Conclusion

The aviation market presents a dynamic landscape characterized by opportunities, challenges, and ongoing evolution. Despite facing headwinds such as the COVID-19 pandemic, regulatory complexities, and infrastructure constraints, the aviation industry remains resilient and adaptable, driven by innovation, technological advancements, and market demand.

#Aviation Sector #Global Aviation Industry #Aviation Market Outlook #Aviation Market Analysis #Aviation Market Segmentation #Aviation Market Top players

0 notes

gqresearch24 · 8 months ago

Text

Directed Energy Weapons Market is Dazzling Worldwide and Forecast to 2030 | GQ Research

The Directed Energy Weapons market is set to witness remarkable growth, as indicated by recent market analysis conducted by GQ Research. In 2023, the global Directed Energy Weapons market showcased a significant presence, boasting a valuation of US 6.33 Billion. This underscores the substantial demand for Directed Energy Weapons technology and its widespread adoption across various industries.

Get Sample of this Report at: https://gqresearch.com/request-sample/global-directed-energy-weapons-market/

Projected Growth: Projections suggest that the Directed Energy Weapons market will continue its upward trajectory, with a projected value of US$ 17.02 Billion by 2030. This growth is expected to be driven by technological advancements, increasing consumer demand, and expanding application areas.

Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR): The forecast period anticipates a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 19.45 %, reflecting a steady and robust growth rate for the Directed Energy Weapons market over the coming years.

Technology Adoption:

Rapid adoption of directed energy weapons (DEWs) for defense and security applications.

Integration of laser, microwave, and particle beam technologies for precise targeting and neutralization of threats.

Development of mobile and airborne DEW platforms for versatility and operational flexibility.

Application Diversity:

Deployment in military applications including missile defense, counter-drone systems, and anti-ship weaponry.

Use in law enforcement for riot control, perimeter security, and non-lethal incapacitation of targets.

Potential applications in space debris removal and satellite defense.

Consumer Preferences:

Reliability and effectiveness in neutralizing threats with minimal collateral damage.

Scalability and adaptability to address evolving security challenges.

Cost-effectiveness compared to traditional kinetic weapons systems.

Compliance with international regulations and ethical considerations.

Technological Advancements:

Advancements in beam control and power scaling for increased range and lethality.

Development of compact and lightweight DEW systems for integration onto various platforms.

Enhancement of target acquisition and tracking capabilities through sensor fusion and AI algorithms.

Market Competition:

Intense competition among defense contractors and technology companies.

Differentiation through innovation in beam control, power generation, and thermal management.

Collaboration with government agencies and military branches to develop and field DEW systems.

Focus on export opportunities and international partnerships to expand market reach.

Environmental Considerations:

Minimization of environmental impact through precise targeting and reduced collateral damage.

Compliance with international laws and regulations regarding the use of directed energy weapons.

Consideration of environmental factors such as weather conditions and atmospheric effects on weapon performance.

Ethical considerations regarding the escalation of conflicts and the potential for unintended consequences.

Regional Dynamics: Different regions may exhibit varying growth rates and adoption patterns influenced by factors such as consumer preferences, technological infrastructure and regulatory frameworks.

Key players in the industry include:

Lockheed Martin Corporation

Raytheon Technologies Corporation

Northrop Grumman Corporation

Thales Group

BAE Systems PLC

The BOEING Company

Textron Inc.

Rheinmetall AG

L3Harris Technologies Inc.

RAFAEL Advanced Defence Systems Ltd.

The research report provides a comprehensive analysis of the Directed Energy Weapons market, offering insights into current trends, market dynamics and future prospects. It explores key factors driving growth, challenges faced by the industry, and potential opportunities for market players.

For more information and to access a complimentary sample report, visit Link to Sample Report: https://gqresearch.com/request-sample/global-directed-energy-weapons-market/

About GQ Research:

GQ Research is a company that is creating cutting edge, futuristic and informative reports in many different areas. Some of the most common areas where we generate reports are industry reports, country reports, company reports and everything in between.

Contact:

Jessica Joyal

+1 (614) 602 2897 | +919284395731

Website - https://gqresearch.com/

#DirectedEnergyWeapons #DEW #MilitaryTechnology #DefenseInnovation #AerospaceSecurity

0 notes

katia-lima · 9 months ago

Text

introducing ; katia lima

cliff notes ;

FULL NAME: katia rose lima

GENDER: female

PRONOUNS: she/her

AGE: thirty-one

DOB: february 20th

OCCUPATION: engineer & paper/candle maker

RESIDENCE: the town

RESIDENT or VISITOR: visitor

HUNTER or GATHERER: n/a - this may change depending on her stay

TITLE: the guilty

FACECLAIM: kaya scodelario

lets dig a little deeper ;

31 years old

mother was brazillian and she spent a lot of time growing up there until the family relocated to england

spend her childhood in england and landed a job at lockheed martin - a company that specialises in military and combat equipment, radar systems, aircraft and missiles etc

she worked her way up there and ended up on a navy base

when developing new equipment she met with some soldiers to trial run some of the items - it was there she met donovan redfield.

the two hit it off instantly. sparks flying and intensely in love, they quickly eloped. a small and simple ceremony that was perfect in her eyes.

married live was going good and then donovan got called away.

time dragged without him there and while he was away, she relied on her friends around her. that was her first mistake.

one of her 'friends' had a thing for her and took his opportunity to move in and attempt to steal her away. he was in her ear telling her that donovan was never coming back.

more time had passed and this 'friend' really had done a number on her by convincing her that donovan was gone. the 'friend' had completely gaslit her into believing that donovan was gone or that he was off having an affair.

succumbing to the heartbreak that he would leave her along with everything else she was led to believe, she made the horrible and misguided decision to seek comfort in the 'friend'

wracked with guilt, it ate away at her and she broke down when donovan walked through the door one day returning home

she told him immediately but the damage was done. katia could see him shutting down in front of her. she'd lost him.

divorce followed and she did nothing to fight donovan on whatever he wanted from the proceedings

she now can see what happened and knows that it doesn't justify her actions. she takes full accountability in her part no matter how misguided she was.

after all these years the guilt still consumes her about it all and how it broke their marriage. she's well aware she lost someone amazing in him and it kills her to know she hurt him.

she left lockheed martin after her marriage broke down, she couldn't bare the thought of seeing donovan and upsetting him again. katia transferred to raytheon to work on aviation, space and defence.

she arrived in huntsville a few weeks ago. she was travelling for work to the latest launch point for the product her team has been working on but her gps went haywire and she somehow ended up in town.

was told on arrival about the monsters and how they show up as people who have passed away. it didn't bother her emotionally until she witnessed her mother one evening. katia had to be pinned to the ground to stop her from bolting outside.

additional information ;

+ has been in town for a few weeks now

+ has a car up for grabs

+ finds it fascinating how some things work in town and some things don't

possible connections ;

new friends

new best friend

donovan's friends or anyone he's told about her

acquaintances

dislike

co-workers

customers @ the trading post for paper & candles

crush

neighbours

will be updated to suit as katia's time at huntsville progresses

#huntsvilleintro #tw cheating #tw psychological coercion #katiaheadcanon

0 notes

agape-philo-sophia · 9 months ago

Text

➝ The Shadow Government.

Much like the ‘Official” government we are aware of, this shadow government can be dissected into functional branches. The Executive Branch, The Intelligence Branch, The War Department, The Weapons Industry Branch, and the Financial Department.

These compartments are just a fraction of the whole, and in the United States alone.

• Executive Branch would be the most obvious, being that this is where all the control is. It would consist of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Tri Lateral Commission, The Bilderberg Group, National Security Council (NSC), Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), National Program Office (NPO), Federal Emergency Management Agency.

• The Intelligence Branch consists of a very well known government agency the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), as well as the FBI, National Security Agency (NSA), National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), National Reconnaissance Organization (NRO), NSA’s Central Security Service, The CIA’s Special Security Office, U.S Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), U.S Navy Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), U.S Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI), Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), NASA Intelligence, Air Force Special Security Service, Defense Industry Security Command (DISCO), Defense Investigative Service (DIS), Naval Investigative Service (NIS), Air Force Electronic Security Command, Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Intelligence, Federal Police Agency Intelligence, Defense Electronic Security Command, etc

• The War Department – CIA’s Directorate for Science and Technology, Strategic Defense Initiative Office (SDIO), Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO), Department of Energy (DOE), Edwards AFB, CA, Area 51 – Groom Lake and S-4 (Papoose Lake Base) , U.S Special Operations Command, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), The Jason Group, Aquarius Group, Defense Science Board, Defense Nuclear Agency, U.S Space Command, North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), Air Force Office of Space Systems, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), etc.

• Weapons Industry Branch – Stanford Research Institute, Inc, AT&T, RAND Corporation, Edgerton, Germhausen & Greer Corporation, Wackenhut Corporation, Bechtel Corporation, United Nuclear Corporation, Walsh Construction Company, Aerojet (Genstar Corp), Reynolds Electronics Engineering, Lear Aircraft Company, Northrop Corporation, Hughes Aircraft, Lockheed-Martin Corporation, McDonnell-Douglas Corporation, BDM Corporation, General Electric Corporation, PSI-TECH Corporation, Science Applications International Corp.

• Financial Branch – Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Federal Reserve System (FRS), Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), US Department of Treasury, Banks, Private investors.

Other Important Institutions:

• Tri lateral Commission – David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, John D. Rockefeller, Alan Greenspan, Zbignew Brzezinski, Anthony Lake, John Glenn, David Packard, David Gergen, Diane Feinstein, Jimmy Carter, Adm. William Crowe, etc

• NSC – National Security Council – The military and intelligence policy-making and control group for national and international security, which reports directly to the President, Its secret 5412 Committee (which directs covert operations) and it’s PI-40 Subcommittee (MJ-12 which exercises policy direction and control of the UFO Cover-up.)

• CIA – Central Intelligence Agency – Commands, often controls, and sometimes coordinates, the gathering of secret overseas information gathered by spies (HUMINT), electronic surveillance (SIGINT) and other means; carries out covert unconstitutional paramilitary counterinsurgency operations and preemptive political pacification projects in violation of international law, as well as country-intelligence sting operations against foreign agents, engages in domestic surveillance, and manipulation of the U.S political process in the “National interest” in direct violation of its congressional charter; operates proprietary “false front” companies for profit, conducts and major share of international trans-shipment of illegal drugs, using National Security cover and immunity, and cooperates with NSA’s UFO cover-up operations, Langley, VA and worldwide.

• JCS – Joint Chiefs of Staff – Special Operations compartment, the operations directorate which implements the orders of the NSC’s 5412 Committee, utilizing Special Forces Command.

• NPO – National Program Office – Operates the Continuity of Government Project (COG) an ongoing secret project to maintain command, control, communication, and intelligence executive centers during an extreme National Emergency by operating clandestine, secure, underground cities staffed by surrogates for above ground national leaders.

• FEMA – Federal Emergency Management Agency – FEMA’s black project compartment, which operates preventative-detention camps, and secure underground shelters for the elite during cataclysms. Also could possess complete control by president Executive Orders in the case of a national emergency.

• NSA – National Security Agency – Monitors and screens all telephone, telegraph, computer modem, radio, television, cellular, microwave and satellite communications and electromagnetic fields of “interest” around the world, and orchestrates information control and cover-up activities related to UFO secrecy and surveillance of extra-terrestrial operations. Fort Meade, MD.

• NRO – National Reconnaissance Office – Controls and collects information from global spy satellites, monitors UFO traffic entering and leaving Earth’s atmosphere, coordinates firing of energy beam weapons for orbiting Star Wars satellites at selected human ground and airborne targets and selectively at extra-terrestrial craft, Pentagon basement and Dulles Airport area, Virginia.

• NRO – National Reconnaissance Organization – aka MJ-TF. The military/intelligence operations arm of the PI-40 Subcommittee (MJ-12) Conducts surveillance, interdiction, capture and confiscation of UFOs and their extra-terrestrial occupants for intelligence and “International Security” purposes, “interacts” with close encounter experiences, including occasional physically and sexually assaulted mind control kidnappings disguised as abductions for psychological warfare and dis-informational purposes, headquarters unknown, probably compartmentalized and dispersed among various elite Delta Force Special Operations units.

• The Jason Society – President Eisenhower secretly commissioned a group of scholars, known as The JASON Society to review the conclusions of the ’57 symposium. The members of the JASON Society are in fact part of a secretive Illuminati group known as the Order of the Quest. The same individuals who formed the JASON Society were also key members on the Council on Foreign Relations. Not surprisingly, the Jason Society agreed with the symposium’s conclusions and drafted three proposals for Eisenhower’s consideration. The three proposals were labeled Alternative 1, Alternative 2, and Alternative 3. Eisenhower rejected Atlernative 1 because it involved the use of nuclear weapons. However, Eisenhower did approve the implementation of Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 (as did the Soviet Union).

• FBI – Federal Bureau Of Investigations – Branch which investigates, uses surveillance and neutralizes foreign Intelligence agents operating within the U.S and cooperates with the National Reconnaissance Organization in the surveillance of those involved in close encounters with UFOs and extra-terrestrials.

• DOE – Department of Energy – Aside from its cover story of researching cleaner-burning coal and gasoline and more solar power, is principally involved in research and development of more specialized nuclear weapons, compact, self-sustaining, fusion powered, particle and wave weapons, including electromagnetic pulse, gravitational/anti-gravitational, laser, particle beam, and plasmoid applied weapons research; high energy invisibility “cloaking” technology, etc.

Funded by DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), the Information Awareness Office’s stated goal was to collect as much information on everyone and everything as possible. This drew much flack to them and the IAO was discontinued. However, its core projects still continue under different names. The logo depicts the Illuminati pyramid with All Seeing Eye shining its light over a globe.

• DOE-INTEL – Department of Energy Intelligence – Conducts internal security checks and external security threat countermeasures, often through its contract civilian instrumentality, the Wackenhut Corporation.

• INSCOM – U.S Army Intelligence and Security Command – Whose assignments include psychological and psychotronic warfar (PSYOPS) and para-psychological intelligence (PSYINT) and electromagnetic intelligence (ELMINT) Ft. Meade, MD.

• DIS – Defense Investigative Service – Conducts investigations into people and situations deemed a possible threat to any operation of the Department of Defense.

• DEA – Drug Enforcement Agency – Intelligence center conducts surveillance and interdiction of drug smuggling operations unless exempted under “National Security” waivers

• DARPA – Defense Advanced Researched Projects Agency – Coordinates the application of latest scientific findings to the development of new generations of weapons.

• The Jason Group – Elite weapons application scientists, developing cutting edge science weapons for DARPA, and operating under the cover of the Mitre Corporation.

• Aquarius Group – UFO technology application scientists, reportedly working under the guidance of the Dolphin Society, an elite group of scientists privy to extremely classified science and technology findings.

• NORAD – North American Aerospace Defense Command – Operating the nuclear survivable space surveillance and war command center deep inside Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado Springs, CO.

• NASA – National Aeronautics and Space Administration – Operates covert space defense, ET research, and space weapons compartments, in additional to manned Shuttle and unmanned scientific satellite launches.

• Stanford Research Institute, Inc. – An intelligence contractor involved in psychotronic, para-psychological and PSY-WAR research.

0 notes

chandupalle · 9 months ago

Text

Anti-Drone Companies - RTX (US) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (US) are the Key Players

The global anti-drone market was valued at USD 1.2 billion in 2022 and is projected to reach USD 5.2 billion by 2028; it is expected to register a CAGR of 26.6% during the forecast period. Increasing government spending on counter-drone technologies and rising incidence of critical infrastructure security breaches by unauthorized drones are attributed to the ever-increasing demand for anti-drone systems.

Major Anti-Drone companies include:

RTX (US),

Lockheed Martin Corporation (US),

Leonardo S.p.A. (Italy),

Thales (France),

IAI (Israel),

Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd. (Israel),

Blighter Surveillance Systems Limited (UK),

DroneShield Ltd (Australia),

Dedrone (US),

Accipiter Radar (Canada),

Boeing (US),

Moog Inc. (US),

HENSOLDT (Germany),

ApolloShield (US),

Saab (Sweden),

Northrop Grumman (US),

MBDA (Germany),

ASELSAN A.S. (Turkey),

DeTect, Inc. (US),

Battelle Memorial Institute (US), ART (Spain), Drone Defence (UK), Drone Major (England), SkySafe (US), BlueHalo (US), Fortem Technologies (US), D-Fend Solutions AD Ltd. (Israel), and CERBAIR (France) are some of the key players in the anti-drone market.

RTX

The Raytheon Missiles & Defense segment functions as a primary contractor or key subcontractor for multiple projects within the US Department of Defense, encompassing branches, such as the US Navy, US Army, Missile Defense Agency, US Air Force, and various international governments. Raytheon Australia, Speed Queen (US), Blue Canyon Technologies (US), Pratt & Whitney (US), and Microtecnica (Brazil) are its subsidiaries. It has a presence in over 30 countries, including the US, the UK, Australia, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

Lockheed Martin Corporation operates as a global security and aerospace company engaged in researching, designing, developing, manufacturing, and integrating technologies, systems, products, and services. The company operates through the following business segments: Aeronautics, Missiles and Fire Control (MFC), Rotary and Mission Systems (RMS), and Space.

This segment is dedicated to activities, such as air and missile defense systems, tactical missiles, air-to-ground precision strike weapons, logistics, fire control systems, mission operations support, engineering support, integration services, manned and unmanned ground vehicles, and energy management solutions.

Leonardo S.p.A.

Leonardo S.p.A. operates in the aerospace, defense, and security sectors. The company operates through six reportable segments: Helicopters, Defence Electronics and Security, Aircraft, Aerostructures, Space and Other Activities. The Helicopters segment designs commercial and military rotorcrafts. The Helicopters segment manufactures complete tactical airlifters, combat aircraft, and unmanned air vehicles for civil and military applications. Under this segment, it specializes in designing rotorcrafts for commercial and military purposes. The Defence, Electronics & Security segment is engaged in information management, sensors, and systems integration businesses and delivers systems for critical missions, military sustainment requirements, and homeland security. It also provides combat support systems and services; unmanned, automation and electronic systems; missile systems; sensors, radars, and communications for airborne, land, naval, and underwater applications; artillery, power, and propulsion systems; weapon systems; torpedoes; and armored vehicles.

Leonardo DRS, a wholly owned subsidiary of Leonardo S.p.A., offers counter UAS systems and solutions through the Defence, Electronics & Security segment. This segment is involved in activities, such as information management, sensor technology, and system integration. It also delivers systems crucial for critical missions, military sustainability, and homeland security. It produces missile systems, torpedoes, naval artilleries, and armored vehicles.

Thales

Thales is a holding company that manufactures and sells electronic equipment and systems for the aeronautics, naval, and defense sectors. The company was formed in 1968 and is headquartered in Paris, France. Compagnie Francaise Thomson-Houston (CFTH) was founded in 1893, and in 1919, its name was changed to Compagnie General de Telegraphie Sansfil (CSF). Furthermore, the merger between CSF and Thomson-Brandt led to the formation of Thomson-CSF in 1968, and in 2000, the company changed its name to Thales.

Thales is a global technology leader in the aerospace, transport, aerospace & defense, digital identity, and security markets. The company produces, promotes, and distributes electronic equipment and systems within the aeronautics, naval, and defense sectors. It operates through the following segments: Defense and Security, Digital Identity and Security, Aerospace, and Others.

#Anti-Drone Companies

0 notes

lboogie1906 · 9 months ago

Text

Dr. Warren Elliot Henry (February 18, 1909 - October 31, 2001) enjoyed a long and influential career in the field of physical chemistry, working in the public and private sectors and academia. His areas of expertise included radar technology and solid-state physics. His nearly 100 publications appeared in leading peer-reviewed journals and he often presented his work at meetings of the American Physical Society. He served as a mentor to hundreds of undergraduate and graduate students.

Born in China, Alabama, he grew up in Evergreen. His parents, Nelson E. Henry and Mattye McDaniel Henry, both held degrees from the Tuskegee Institute.

He enrolled at Tuskegee, completing a BS in Mathematics. He served as principal of the Escambia County Training School and moved to Atlanta to teach Physics and Mathematics at Spelman and Morehouse Colleges. He would continue his education during this period, earning an MS in Organic Chemistry from Atlanta University. He completed a Ph.D. in Physics and Physical Chemistry at the University of Chicago. He worked with several Nobel Prize winners. He returned to teach at Tuskegee.

He was recruited to work at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s radiation laboratory. He focused on radar systems for the Navy. He spent a year as a Postdoctoral Fellowship at the Institute of Metal at the University of Chicago before returning to Morehouse College as acting head of the Physics Department. He worked at the Naval Research Laboratory (1948-60) where he studied cryo magnetics, superconductivity, and magnetic susceptibilities. He invented a metal dewar for liquid helium.

He worked for the Lockheed Missiles and Space Company as a senior staff engineer and scientist. He continued his work on submarine detection and contributed to the study of materials for space travel. His final professional position was at Howard University where he taught in the physics department (1969-77) and worked on the Minority Access to Research Careers Program.

He enjoyed a long marriage to Jeanne Pearlson Henry. The couple had one daughter. #africanhistory365 #africanexcellence

1 note · View note

usafphantom2 · 1 year ago

Text

Patria will build F-35 front fuselage assemblies in Finland

Fernando Valduga By Fernando Valduga 19/06/2023 - 16:00in Military

The Patria of Finland will begin producing front fuselage assemblies of the F-35 under a Memorandum of Understanding (MoA) that the company signed with Lockheed Martin.

"This agreement between Patria and Lockheed Martin on the assembly of the front fuselage of the F-35 is a significant milestone for Finland's F-35 program and for Patria. The large-scale assembly of 400 front fuselages will take Patria's industrial capabilities to the next level. The initial cooperation with Lockheed Martin worked extremely well, which built an excellent foundation also for future collaboration," said Petri Hepola, Director of Programs of the F-35 at Patria.

The main industrial cooperation projects for Patria include this large-scale assembly of front fuselages of the F-35 in Finland also for international users and additional production of structural components. In addition, Patria will establish production projects with Pratt & Whitney for the F135 engines that equip the Finnish F-35s.

The Finnish government selected the F-35 as the winner of the HX Program on December 10, 2021. The Finnish Air Force will receive 64 F-35A aircraft, a support solution adapted to Finnish supply safety requirements and a comprehensive training program.

With a combination of stealth, sensor fusion and unparalleled situational awareness, the F-35 will secure Finland's airspace in the coming decades.

Tags: Military AviationF-35 Lightning IIIlmavoimat/Finland Air ForceLockheed MartinPatria

Sharing

Fernando Valduga

Aviation photographer and pilot since 1992, has participated in several events and air operations, such as Cruzex, AirVenture, Daytona Airshow and FIDAE. He has works published in specialized aviation magazines in Brazil and abroad. Uses Canon equipment during his photographic work around the world of aviation.