#Iwtv spoilers
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
live-laugh-love-dietrich · 2 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
I feel like op’s tags deserved to be seen so I’m adding them
really appreciate daniel walking into louis' apartment in san fransisco with the sole purpose of getting laid. and when he listened to louis bitch about his crazy ex for like 10 hours, and an even crazier vampire walked in and shit started to get REALLY nuts, daniel still sat there and said "by god ive made it this far i WILL get laid tonight even if its by this absolutely fucking mental guy whos lowkey been torturing me for the last few hours" he said rest in peace louis but im getting dick no matter what tonight. now THATS the indomitable human spirit
1K notes · View notes
lavender-lady-777 · 2 days ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
he is the most pathetic cringefail loser boyfriend of all time... i need him
133 notes · View notes
cr0ws-doodles · 1 day ago
Text
Tumblr media
Is that what makes you fascinating?
49 notes · View notes
ace-of-d1am0nds · 2 days ago
Text
The Birds
Was there ever really innocence?
thank you my lovely friend @kastledevils for the gifs<3
Tumblr media
Paul is a representation of Louis’ innocence and his obliviousness to Lestat’s (and his own eventual) vampirism. Paul and his birds become a sort of plot device for which Louis can see his own responsibility and how it is clouding his judgment. Paul’s schizophrenia not only leads him to believe he has birds telling him things but it also leads him to the church a place in which Louis denies until after Paul’s death. The death of the birds is a loss of innocence regarding his “devious” and damned tendencies, of which Lestat will immediately strip him of that innocence further by turning him into a vampire.
Tumblr media
Lestat says to Claudia after berating her for attempting to turn a number of boys, claiming the reason it didn’t work is because she is too fragile to be successful. The foreshadowing to season 2 is incredibly strong in this scene. I’ll get to that, though. Lestat pointing out Claudia’s physical and emotional immaturity in this scene as a whole is highlighted by the bird metaphor. He is calling her a small, breakable thing and she effectually proves his point. She goes on a killing spree, keeping souvenirs, and eventually running away. Only then does she lose that innocence portrayed by the birds.
Tumblr media
Louis baiting birds to their window when he first arrives to Paris is an interesting choice if we choose to follow this metaphor. In his mind, he has already lost his innocence in the act of killing Lestat. This is reflected in his killing and draining of the birds that come to his balcony railing. What is not taken into account in his perspective of his own innocence is the fact that he is feeding the birds. He is bringing life to those he does not kill. He is trying to rebuild an innocence he had lost long ago through finding himself in Paris. He wants his autonomy back, he wants to know who he is outside of Lestat and Claudia, something that Claudia herself encourages. When Armand comes into the picture, this changes and he stops feasting on the birds, at least not in front of Claudia.
Tumblr media
In the corner of the painting of Arun/Amadeo/Armand, there are birds in the corner of the image. Armand is describing his tragic and traumatic upbringing and we barely get a glimpse of them flying in the corner. Armand never had an innocence to him. From such a young age he was a servant and a slave, yet there is a sort of innocence to how he describes this time in his life. He says “I served him with all my heart.” This way of thinking is what gets him into the situations we see him in. His childhood is less innocence than it is a naivety. His retrospective look on his childhood and adolescence is with rose tinted glasses as he describes Amadeo’s experience with Marius as a twisted sort of love (I do not condone the actions of Marius de Romanus, I’m only saying Armand believes he was in love with him).
Tumblr media
Ok, this is the lynchpin in my whole argument. Baby Lou. Delainey Hayes’ Claudia is all about reclaiming her adulthood now that she isn’t tied to her maker. And yet… The role she is placed in by the Paris coven is that of the young little bird. She tries to learn to escape and fly away again and again but she fails and falls to her death with a crack in the concrete. Her ghost floats above her, the freedom she never got. Over and over again she fights the role until eventually, she runs away with her lover, Madeleine. Claudia, however, was always doomed by the narrative and is roped back to Paris and well, we know how that ends…
36 notes · View notes
toriangeli · 2 days ago
Text
I see your “All You Wanna Do” on your Armand playlist and raise you “The Dark I Know Well.”
38 notes · View notes
visionsofaselfmademan · 10 hours ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
You know an actor's monologue is phenomenal when you spend weeks writing a poem trying to explain how and why you find it hauntingly beautiful. As Cesar A. Cruz beautifully and eloquently wrote: "Art should comfort the disturbed and disturb the comfortable." I think of that quote often when I try to describe why I love the Vampire Chronicles (as well as this specific moment in the show): there is something about it that comforts those of us misfits who find solace in the macabre.
Assad Zaman, thank you for bringing my favorite vampire to life in such a beautiful and hauntingly ethereal way. 🖤 This character is dear to so many, and you play him beautifully. If one fan's humble opinion is worth anything, you—and all of the cast and crew of Interview with the Vampire—deserve many awards for your hard work.
26 notes · View notes
gracerings · 5 months ago
Text
daniel molloy character of all time once again: like imagine you’re a 20-something drug addict and a terrible journalist on account of being 20-something and a drug addict and you randomly meet a vampire at a gay bar and you think wow I might get drugs, gay sex and a story out of this and instead what you get is psychologically and physically tortured by his husband and your memories of it all erased and then 50 years later you’re DYING and those vampires show up in your life again to ask you to write the story of their happy marriage and your memory might be fucked but ON GOD you WILL ruin that marriage if it’s the last thing you do. and then not only do you succeed and walk out of it alive, but also with a bestseller, millions in your bank account AND immortality AND the knowledge that your annoying human ass was somehow the one thing that made that 500+ year old predator so mad that he broke his lifetime vow to never turn anyone. AND, on top of that, you’re out of the CLOSET.
23K notes · View notes
loo-nuh-tik · 3 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Interview with the Vampire | 2.02
16K notes · View notes
shhhhimwatchingthis · 5 months ago
Text
My favourite underrated thing about Louis de Point du Lac is that he truly is the least curious vampire to ever be made and he does not give fuck about vampires despite being one.
Its Claudia who goes to libraries, reads the folklore, tries to learn as much as she can and pushes Lestat for answers about who made him and where the others are. Claudia says Vampire Pride and Louis says hmmm Vampire Tolerance.
And Louis...truly does not care about vampire history,law, culture. He's never even thought to ask. There are vampire laws?...ok...Lestat never cared about them and he's not going to either, lol. He's broken a few and he will continue to do so. Oh you have a coven? he's not gonna join it, he's gonna do his own thing. but good for you good for you.
the 500+ year old Coven Leader, he's gonna call Louis, Maitre, actually.
He has fire powers? thats kinda cool. he'll learn that but only cause it lets him vent his feelings about Lestat.
Lestat and Armand say the name of the vampire queen in front of him and Lestat straight up says, "Louis has no idea who that is" and do you think Louis cares, outside of the fact that for some reason it means he can't kill Lestat? No! Do you think in the 77 years he's been with Armand he ever took 5 minutes to ask a follow up question? No!
Do you think he will care about Akasha in season 3? Doubt it! Outside of her obsession with Lestat, who is the only person left on the planet he seems to be able to filter Caring About This Shit through
He blatantly breaks the 3rd law and publishes a book about being a vampire and when the other vampires get pissed not only does he not apologise he literally sends them his location and says 'you wanna fight? lmao don't miss'
I love him. Daniel Molloy is gonna need to bring his A game because Louis will not be solving a single mystery next season, nor would it even occur to him to try.
14K notes · View notes
kayascodelorio · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
INTERVIEW WITH THE VAMPIRE S3 TEASER | Meet the Vampire Lestat ft. Sam Reid
19K notes · View notes
speckled-jim · 5 months ago
Text
Armand: "I had never made one. The idea repulsed m— repulses me."
Armand when Louis leaves him alone for two seconds with Daniel:
Tumblr media
14K notes · View notes
zamanassad · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
vampire with a pearl earring
15K notes · View notes
ayo-edebiri · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
#And he was right!!!
INTERVIEW WITH THE VAMPIRE (2022 - ) I 2.08
15K notes · View notes
userarmand · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
I feel like I get to pick one thing for myself, and it's her. A weird white lady I met by happenstance.
18K notes · View notes
prouvaireafterdark · 5 months ago
Text
listen I know it's heartbreaking that Claudia dies and it's understandable to wish she didn't, but let's please not accuse the writers of fridging her. to do so is a fundamental misunderstanding of the story and is frankly insulting to the intelligence and skill of the writers of the show.
Claudia's death, and the overwhelming grief and regret her parents experience because of it, is quite literally the point of the entire story. she dies because Anne's daughter Michele died of leukemia when she was five years old and there was nothing she or her husband could do to prevent it.
writing IWTV was how Anne coped with the unimaginable loss of a parent losing her child. she created a story about a little girl that could not die and then killed her anyway. Claudia's death is a senseless, unavoidable tragedy, just like Michele's was. the grief that haunts Louis and Lestat for the rest of their lives is the same grief that haunted Anne and her husband.
so when you're accusing people of killing Claudia off to benefit a story about two men, please remember that in real life sometimes parents lose their children. please remember Michele Rice.
Tumblr media
she's the reason Claudia exists.
she's also the reason Claudia cannot be saved.
17K notes · View notes
jeyneofpoole · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
crazy face to make at one half of the couple you’re impromptu divorce lawyering for after you’ve just exposed seventy years worth of his lies including but not limited to aiding abetting and directing the death of two beautiful lesbians one of which was sort of his stepdaughter also btw this couple is comprised of nuclear warheads in the shape of beautiful men and you sort of had a thing with both of them that one time in the seventies when you thought you were going to get high and your dick sucked but instead got saw-trapped by a renegade botticelli angel with all mental illnesses in the dsm-5 and a couple others we haven’t categorized yet. daniel molloy you will live forever
20K notes · View notes