#International Agricultural Food and Product Exporters

[jrpimpex]

Natural Sesame Seeds Supplier in India - JRP Impex

When it comes to sourcing the finest natural sesame seeds supplier in India, look no further than JRP Impex. We take pride in being one of the leading suppliers of premium-quality sesame seeds, catering to a wide range of industries and customers both domestically and internationally. Contact us or visit our website to explore our products : https://www.jrpimpex.com

 Natural Sesame Seeds Supplier in India

Sesame seeds have been cherished for centuries for their distinct flavor, crunchy texture, and remarkable health benefits. Among the various types of sesame seeds, Natural Sesame Seeds Supplier in India stand out for their untouched purity and rich nutritional profile. In this blog post, we will delve into the captivating world of natural sesame seeds, exploring their health benefits, culinary uses, and the expertise of JRP Impex in sourcing and delivering high-quality natural sesame seeds to customers worldwide.

A Nutritional Powerhouse: Natural sesame seeds are small but mighty in terms of nutritional value. Packed with essential nutrients, they offer a wide range of health benefits. These tiny seeds are an excellent source of protein, healthy fats, dietary fiber, and an array of vitamins and minerals. They are particularly rich in calcium, iron, magnesium, and phosphorus, making them a valuable addition to a balanced diet.

Heart-Healthy Benefits: Including natural sesame seeds in your diet can contribute to a healthy heart. They contain a unique blend of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats, such as omega-6 fatty acids. These healthy fats can help reduce bad cholesterol levels and promote good cholesterol, thereby supporting cardiovascular health.

Nutrient-Dense Snacking: Natural sesame seeds supplier in india can serve as a nutritious snack option for those seeking a satisfying and wholesome treat. Sprinkle them on salads, yogurt, or fruit bowls for an added crunch and nutty flavor. Additionally, you can blend them into smoothies or use them as a topping for baked goods like bread and cookies, elevating both taste and nutritional value.

Culinary Versatility: Sesame seeds are celebrated for their versatility in the kitchen. Natural sesame seeds can be used in both sweet and savory dishes, adding a unique taste and texture. They are commonly used as a garnish in Asian cuisine, adding a delightful crunch to stir-fries, noodles, and sushi. Moreover, they can be ground into tahini, a creamy sesame paste, which is a key ingredient in Middle Eastern dishes like hummus and baba ganoush.

JRP Impex: Your Trusted Source for Quality Sesame Seeds. When it comes to sourcing premium natural sesame seeds, Hulled Sesame Seeds, Sesame Seeds, Roasted Seasame Seeds. JRP Impex is a name you can trust. With their extensive experience in the import and export industry, JRP Impex ensures the procurement of superior quality sesame seeds from trusted International Agricultural Food and Product Exporters suppliers. Their commitment to quality control, adherence to food safety standards, and efficient supply chain management make them a reliable partner for businesses seeking top-notch sesame seeds.

Conclusion: Natural sesame seeds are a treasure trove of nutrition and culinary possibilities. From their remarkable health benefits to their diverse uses in cooking, these tiny seeds have much to offer. Whether you’re a health-conscious individual or a culinary enthusiast, incorporating natural sesame seeds into your diet can enhance both your well-being and culinary adventures. With JRP Impex’s expertise in delivering high-quality sesame seeds, you can embark on a flavorful journey, savoring the best that natural sesame seeds have to offer.

[growmorebusinessptyltd]

Your trusted partner in global agriculture trade

Discover the world’s finest agricultural products with our import-export services. From farm to global market, we ensure the highest quality, sustainable practices, and timely delivery. Partner with us to enrich your offerings, support local farmers, and contribute to a thriving global economy.

[adalidda]

Illustration photo: Maize kernels being processed for food manufacturing (public domain)

Unveiling the Treasure of West Africa: Maize Grains from Sahel Agri-Sol

July 5, 2024

In the heart of West Africa, where the fertile lands of Mali stretch under the warm African sun, Sahel Agri-Sol cultivates nature's bounty - maize grains that stand unrivaled in quality, flavor, and versatility. As a leading producer and exporter of agricultural commodities, we invite food and cosmetics manufacturers worldwide to discover the transformative power of our exceptional corn.

A Legacy of Excellence

Sahel Agri-Sol's story is deeply rooted in the rich agricultural tradition of Mali. For generations, our farmers have nurtured the land, combining time-honored techniques with modern sustainable practices. This unique approach results in maize grains that not only meet but exceed global standards, offering a product that's truly special in today's market.

For Food Manufacturers: Elevate Your Culinary Creations

Flavor Profile

Our maize grains boast a robust, slightly sweet flavor with nutty undertones - a testament to the unique terroir of West Africa. This distinctive taste can add depth and character to a wide range of food products, setting your offerings apart in a competitive market.

Versatility

From traditional cornmeal and polenta to innovative snack foods and gourmet popcorn, our maize adapts beautifully to diverse applications. Its superior texture and consistent quality make it ideal for:

Nutritional Excellence

Packed with essential nutrients, our maize is a powerhouse of:

For Cosmetics Manufacturers: Nature's Beauty Secret Unveiled

Innovative Ingredients

Unlock the potential of maize in your cosmetic formulations:

1. Corn Silk Extract: Rich in antioxidants, it offers anti-aging and skin-soothing properties.

2. Corn Oil: A lightweight, non-comedogenic oil perfect for moisturizers and hair care products.

3. Corn Starch: An excellent natural absorbent for powders and dry shampoos.

4. Microfine Cornmeal: Gentle exfoliant for body scrubs and facial cleansers.

Eco-Friendly Appeal

In an era where consumers demand natural, sustainable beauty solutions, our maize-derived ingredients offer a compelling narrative. Highlight the purity and origin of your ingredients, connecting your brand to the vibrant agricultural heritage of West Africa.

The Sahel Agri-Sol Advantage

1. Sustainable Cultivation

Our farms employ a blend of traditional wisdom and modern eco-friendly practices, ensuring minimal environmental impact while maximizing yield and quality.

2. Rigorous Quality Control

From seed selection to harvest and processing, every step is meticulously monitored. Our state-of-the-art facilities and stringent testing protocols guarantee purity, consistency, and safety.

3. Flexible Solutions

Whether you need bulk shipments or smaller quantities, we offer customizable packaging options to suit your specific requirements.

4. Year-Round Availability

Our strategic planning and extensive storage facilities ensure a stable supply throughout the year, protecting your production schedules from seasonal fluctuations.

5. Competitive Edge

By choosing Sahel Agri-Sol, you're not just buying superior maize - you're investing in a story of sustainability, tradition, and quality that resonates with today's conscious consumers.

6. Support and Expertise

Our team of agricultural experts and customer service professionals is always ready to assist you, from product selection to logistics support.

Global Reach, Local Impact

By partnering with Sahel Agri-Sol, you're not only elevating your products but also supporting sustainable agricultural practices and contributing to the economic development of West African communities.

Experience the Sahel Agri-Sol Difference

We invite you to discover the unparalleled quality of our West African maize. Contact us today to request samples, discuss your specific needs, or arrange a visit to our facilities in Mali. Let's explore how Sahel Agri-Sol's premium maize grains can revolutionize your product line and captivate your customers.

Bring the golden essence of West Africa to your global products. Choose Sahel Agri-Sol - where quality meets tradition, and innovation embraces nature.

Sahel Agri-Sol

Hamdallaye ACI 2 000,

« BAMA » building 5th floor APT 7

Bamako

Mali

Phone: +223 20 22 75 77

Mobile:  +223 70 63 63 23, +223 65 45 38 38

WhatsApp/Telegram global marketing and sales: +223 90 99 1099

Email: sales@sahelagrisol.com

Web sites

English https://sahelagrisol.com/en

Français https://sahelagrisol.com/fr

Español https://sahelagrisol.com/es

简体中文 https://sahelagrisol.com/zh

عربي https://sahelagrisol.com/ar

More

[read-marx-and-lenin]

I'm asking this in good faith, but this is something I'm genuinely confused about. Regarding the Holodomor, or the Soviet famine of 1930 in general, why does it matter if it was a genocide or not? At best it seems to be a natural famine exacerbated by poor decision making, and while that is far different from a genocide, I don't understand why that specification matters, because it was still made worse by Soviet intervention, unless I'm getting the facts wrong which I probably am.

It matters to the Western propagandists who were insistent for decades despite zero evidence that the famine was used to commit atrocities against the people of Ukraine. The refrain the whole time was that once the Soviet archives were made public, they'd finally have the proof they needed. The archives are eventually opened, and surprise surprise, there's not only no evidence of the deliberate withholding of grain, there's evidence of significant amounts of food aid being sent to help alleviate the famine. The myth of a Ukrainian genocide began as Nazi propaganda and was adopted as part of the "double genocide" narrative by Western reactionaries after WW2 to downplay the crimes of the Nazis and to maintain a narrative about liberal opposition to "authoritarianism", painting Western capitalists as the "free world" fighting against both fascism and communism. (Don't ask them why they stopped fighting fascism after WW2 though.)

As for the human elements of the famine, it is also part of the typical Western narrative, even among those who admit the Holodomor was not a targeted anti-Ukrainian genocide and who admit that there were environmental factors, to try and put substantial amounts of blame on the Soviet collectivization of agriculture. I am not going to lie and say collectivization went smoothly with no issues, but you cannot ignore the factors of reactionary sabotage by kulaks (including the destruction of animals and grain and the outright murder of party officials) and the effects of Western sanctions and sabotage on the economic development of the USSR.

While some have argued that there was a complete "gold blockade" on the USSR during the famine and so the Soviet Union was forced to export grain to facilitate international trade, the blockade was never enforced by all Western nations at the same time and the Soviets were still able to export gold and silver at various times throughout the 1920s. It is true, however, that gold reserves were stretched thin at the time and the Soviets simply didn't have enough gold to cover their international debts. Soviet gold mines had never been extraordinarily productive and the rest of the Soviet economy was still developing at the time, so grain was one of the few things that they expected to have in surplus. In addition, there were various other sanctions in place by 1930 that did limit who they could trade with and what they could trade with, but the export of grain was almost never restricted. The famine caught them off guard at a very bad time.

While international grain exports were restricted during the famine as grain was diverted to famine-stricken regions of the country (and grain imports were increased as well), the problems with hoarding only worsened as in the panic of the famine, kulaks sought to exploit the people and create a profitable black market on grain. A struggle against the kulaks coincided with worsening environmental effects and the spread of disease among both crops and humans.

The famine was not man-made, it was not entirely natural, and it was not the inevitable outcome of collectivization. It was a perfect storm of a variety of factors. Stalin was not some heartless monster condemning millions of Ukrainians to death for daring to defy the glorious Soviet Union. He was not some idiot who had no idea what he was doing, plunging the nation into famine out of ineptitude. He was not a stubborn maniac who refused to abandon failing economic policies even at the cost of human lives. He was a human being, one of many in charge of the Soviet Union, dealing with concurrent disasters as best as they could.

[najia-cooks]

[ID: Sweet potatoes with black, charred skin on a decorative plate. One has been opened to show bright orange flesh, sprinkled with sugar. End ID]

بطاطا حلوة مشوية / Batata hiluwa mashwiyya (Roasted sweet potatoes)

Sweet potatoes are considered a traditional and nostalgic food in Palestine—a gift from the land, a seasonal delicacy, a potentially profitable crop, "red gold." Every fall and winter, as they are grilled in taboon ovens throughout Gaza, their smell fills the air.

This recipe uses a method of preparation common in rural Palestine, which applies direct heat to char the potatoes; the black, crackly skin is then peeled off, leaving tender, steaming, sweet flesh with a roasted aroma. The peeled sweet potato is eaten on its own, or sprinkled with sugar.

The recent history of sweet potatoes in Gaza is a microcosm of Israel's economic control of the region during that time. Though they grow well in Gaza's soil, they are a risky commitment for its farmers, as the seeds or seedlings must be imported from Israel at considerable expense (about 40 shekels, or $10, per plantlet), and they need to be weeded every day and irrigated every other day. Water for irrigation is scarce in Gaza, as Israel drains and contaminates much of the supply.

Nevertheless, the crop would be a profitable one if Gazan farmers were allowed to export it. In the shmita year of 2014, for the first time since the Israeli military's deadly 51-day invasion two months prior, restrictions briefly eased to allow Gazans to export some agricultural products to Europe; the first shipment contained 30 tons of sweet potatoes. However, an estimated 90% of the sweet potato crop was at that time unsuitable for export, having been damaged by Israeli shrapnel. The Gazan Ministry of Agriculture estimated that damages of this kind cost the agricultural sector about 550 million USD during this year.

Gazan economist Maher al-Taba’a holds that Israel temporarily allowing export of a token amount of sweet potatoes “is nothing more than media propaganda which is meant to confuse international audiences" by giving the impression that the siege on Gaza was looser than it had been before the 2014 ceasefire agreement; meanwhile, the number of allowed exports had actually decreased since before the invasion occurred. Gazan farmers, in fact, were not even allowed to export produce to Palestinians in the West Bank until 2017.

The next shmita year (an agricultural sabbath during which ultra-Orthodox Jews allow their fields to lie fallow) began in September of 2021, around the same time as the beginning of the sweet potato harvest. In anticipation of the shmita year, and in keeping with the trickle of Gazan exports that had been allowed into Israel in the intervening years, many farmers had planted more than they otherwise would have. But Israel delayed accepting the imports, leading many farmers to throw away rotting produce, or to sell their produce in the local market for far lower prices than they had been expecting.

Israel's habit of closing off Gaza's exports arbitrarily and without notice recurred during the harvest season of 2022. When Israeli former MK Yaakov Litzman called on Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development Oded Forer to import sweet potatoes from Gaza due to a shortage of the produce in Israel, Forer refused, citing Israeli soldiers whom Palestinian resistance fighters had taken hostage as rationale for his decision. Other officials were surprised at the linking of an agricultural matter to a political one.

Farmers had no choice but to enter the harvest season hoping that the decision would be reversed and that their time, labor, money, and scarce water resources would not go to waste. With these last-minute decisions that cause Gazan farmers to be unable to fulfill their contracts, Israel damages the future viability of Gazan exports to European markets.

Support Palestinian resistance by calling Elbit System’s (Israel’s primary weapons manufacturer) landlord and donating to Palestine Action’s bail fund.

Equipment:

A fire, wood-burning oven, gas stove, or broiler

A baking sheet

Ingredients:

Sweet potatoes. Choose a variety with red or orange skin and orange flesh, such as garnet or jewel.

Sugar, cinnamon, date syrup, or tahina, to serve.

Instructions:

1. Wash sweet potatoes. Place them at the bottom of a taboon oven, or on a baking sheet or griddle laid over a cooking fire or gas burner. You may also place them on a baking sheet or cast-iron pan inside an oven with a broiler setting.

2. Turn the gas burner on medium-high, or the broiler on low. Heat the sweet potatoes, occasionally rotating them, until their skin is blistered and blackened in multiple places and they are tender all the way through.

3. Remove potatoes and allow them to cool slightly. Slice each potato open lengthwise, or peel away its skin, and eat the interior.

Roasted sweet potatoes may be eaten on their own, or sprinkled with sugar or cinnamon-sugar, or drizzled with date syrup, tahina, chocolate sauce, etc.

[lovehael]

Foreign Aid as a Weapon

Most U.S. aid commits the recipient nation to buy U.S. goods at U.S. prices, to be transported in U.S. ships. In keeping with its commitment to capitalism, the U.S. government does not grant assistance to state-owned enterprises in Third World nations, only to the private sector. Most foreign aid never reaches the needy segments of recipient nations. Much of it is used to subsidize U.S. corporate investment and a substantial amount finds its way into the coffers of corrupt comprador rulers. Some of it subsidizes the cash-crop exports of agribusinesses at the expense of small farmers who grow food for local markets.

The net result of foreign aid, as with most overseas investment, is a greater concentration of wealth for the few and deeper poverty for the many. A large sum of money cannot be injected into a class society in a class-neutral way. It goes either to the rich or the poor, in most cases, the rich.

Aid is also a powerful means of political control. It is withheld when poorer nations dare to effect genuine reforms that might tamper with the distribution of wealth and power. Thus in 1970 when the democratically elected Allende government in Chile initiated reforms that benefited the working class and encroached upon the privileges of wealthy investors, all U.S. aid was cut off- except assistance to the Chilean military, which was increased. In some instances, aid is used deliberately to debilitate local production, as when Washington dumped sorghum and frozen chickens onto the Nicaraguan market to undercut cooperative farms and undermine land reform, or when it sent corn to Somalia to undercut local production and cripple independent village economies. It should be remembered that these corporate agricultural exports are themselves heavily subsidized by the U.S. government.

A key instrument of class-biased aid is the World Bank, an interlocking, international consortium of bankers and economists who spend billions of dollars- much of it from U.S taxpayers- to finance projects that shore up repressive right-wing regimes and subsidize corporate investors at the expense of the poor and the environment. For instance, in the 1980s the World Bank built a highway into northwest Brazil's rain forests, then leveled millions of acres so that wealthy Brazilian ranchers could enjoy cheap grazing lands. Brazil also sent some of its urban poor down that highway to settle the land and further deplete it. Within ten years, the region was denuded and riddled with disease and poverty. As Jim Hightower put it: "All the world's bank robbers combined have not done one-tenth of one percent of the harm that the World Bank has in just fifty years."

Against Empire by Michael Parenti

[probablyasocialecologist]

The standard legend of India’s Green Revolution centers on two propositions. First, India faced a food crisis, with farms mired in tradition and unable to feed an exploding population; and second, Borlaug’s wheat seeds led to record harvests from 1968 on, replacing import dependence with food self-sufficiency.

Recent research shows that both claims are false.

India was importing wheat in the 1960s because of policy decisions, not overpopulation. After the nation achieved independence in 1947, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru prioritized developing heavy industry. U.S. advisers encouraged this strategy and offered to provide India with surplus grain, which India accepted as cheap food for urban workers.

Meanwhile, the government urged Indian farmers to grow nonfood export crops to earn foreign currency. They switched millions of acres from rice to jute production, and by the mid-1960s India was exporting agricultural products.

Borlaug’s miracle seeds were not inherently more productive than many Indian wheat varieties. Rather, they just responded more effectively to high doses of chemical fertilizer. But while India had abundant manure from its cows, it produced almost no chemical fertilizer. It had to start spending heavily to import and subsidize fertilizer.

India did see a wheat boom after 1967, but there is evidence that this expensive new input-intensive approach was not the main cause. Rather, the Indian government established a new policy of paying higher prices for wheat. Unsurprisingly, Indian farmers planted more wheat and less of other crops.

Once India’s 1965-67 drought ended and the Green Revolution began, wheat production sped up, while production trends in other crops like rice, maize and pulses slowed down. Net food grain production, which was much more crucial than wheat production alone, actually resumed at the same growth rate as before.

But grain production became more erratic, forcing India to resume importing food by the mid-1970s. India also became dramatically more dependent on chemical fertilizer.

According to data from Indian economic and agricultural organizations, on the eve of the Green Revolution in 1965, Indian farmers needed 17 pounds (8 kilograms) of fertilizer to grow an average ton of food. By 1980, it took 96 pounds (44 kilograms). So, India replaced imports of wheat, which were virtually free food aid, with imports of fossil fuel-based fertilizer, paid for with precious international currency.

Today, India remains the world’s second-highest fertilizer importer, spending US$17.3 billion in 2022. Perversely, Green Revolution boosters call this extreme and expensive dependence “self-sufficiency.”

[dailyanarchistposts]

People

Hunger Has Natural Causes, Right?

Despite the fact that the world produces 1.5 times as much food as is needed to feed the human population, starvation and famine are endemic to modern capitalism. 900 million people die from starvation each year, but there is no global shortage of land to grow food. The UN estimates that there is enough land to feed a world population of 14 billion people. But what is it being used for? As in the ‘developed’ North, large landowners control the vast majority of land. In 83 countries, 3% of farmers control 79% of farmland, much of it left unused in order to maintain profits. Big Food made over $7bn profit from the South in 1990, and probably far more through transfer payments. It uses its economic power to force down the prices of rice, coffee, sugar, cocoa and cotton. Average prices in 1989 were 20% down on those of 1980. This led to an increase in foreign debt for Southern countries, with consequent increased economic hardship for the poor majority (higher taxes, inflation, etc.). Brazil has an area of farmland the size of India left uncultivated while 20 million rural poor are landless; the richest 1% owns 15 times as much land as the poorest 56% of Brazilian farmers. In Guatemala, 2% of landowners own 66% of the land. In the Philippines agribusiness producing sugar, cotton and pineapples for export has pushed 12 million peasants into the lowland forests.

Drought in Africa is part of a millennia-long cycle that human societies adapted to. It is cash crop exploitation, the market economy and taxation that produce starvation, not drought. During the 1970s, when famines first began to be reported regularly, ships that brought relief supplies to the port of Dakar left carrying peanuts, cotton, vegetables, and meat. In Bangladesh, often cited as the model for the Malthusian argument, 90% of the land is worked by sharecroppers and labourers. Many starved after the 1974 floods, while hoarders held on to four million tons of rice. In the mid-80’s severe famines occurred in the Sahel countries of Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, Senegal and Chad yet during the same period record harvests of cotton were exported to the industrial centres of the world.

Cash crops go to feed the global supermarket, yielding higher profits for international capital and accelerating global industrialisation. Mexican soil and labour supplies almost 70% of the US market for much winter and early spring vegetables. The result is that agriculture for local consumption is squeezed out and the prices of staple foods rise. Up to 50% of total meat production in Central America is exported, mainly to North America. The “Green Revolution” of the 1970s and 1980s, that the ruling class said would feed the hungry, has in fact only supplied the global supermarket. The same will certainly be true of the ‘wonder crops’ of the GM revolution. The corporate claims that GM and industrial food production in general will ‘feed the world’ are straightforward lies. The maize/soya/ animal product system they are pushing so heavily is not a rational way to produce food — an acre of cereal is estimated to produce 5 times as much protein as one devoted to meat production, an acre of legumes (beans, peas, lentils) 10 times as much and an acre of leafy vegetables 15 times as much.

[mariacallous]

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war against Ukraine is not only an attempt at military conquest—it is also very much a total war against the Ukrainian people and their economy.

For almost three years, Russia has pummeled Ukraine’s critical infrastructure, ports, and trade routes with thousands of missiles, drones, and other weapons, many of which are supplied by Russian allies Iran and North Korea or produced with components imported from China. Russia has mined Ukraine’s farmland; seized critical infrastructure, including Europe’s largest nuclear power plant; and escalated its attacks on Ukraine’s electricity generation capacity in an attempt to weaponize winter against the Ukrainian people.

Economic resilience has been a central tenet of Western support for Ukraine, and the country’s economic recovery will be a core element of any postwar settlement. Despite the horrific damage that Russia has done, Ukraine’s economy has been remarkably resilient. Real GDP grew by 5 percent in 2023 and an estimated 4.2 percent in 2024, and it is projected to rise by more than 3 percent in 2025.

Kyiv’s incremental but steady economic gains have been reinforced by the opening of official European Union membership talks in June 2024 and numerous successful reviews by the International Monetary Fund. Ukraine registered 37,000 new businesses over the past year, more than half of which were founded by women. Shipments of agricultural products—a mainstay of Ukrainian exports, including sunflower oil, wheat, and corn going mainly to Africa, Asia, and South America—rivaled pre-invasion volumes earlier this year. Iron production in the first half of 2024 was up 21 percent from the previous year.

The energy system, despite suffering severe damage over almost three years of Russian attacks, continues to function, thanks to the tireless efforts of Ukrainian energy workers and coordinated support from the international community. And almost miraculously, Ukraine has reopened its shipping lanes to and from its Black Sea ports despite ongoing Russian attacks.

Beyond these wartime efforts lies Ukraine’s vast untapped economic potential. Take strategic metals and minerals: Ukraine either produces or has recoverable deposits of 32 out of the 34 mineral commodities listed as critical by the EU. These include titanium, copper, chromite, graphite, lithium, nickel, molybdenum, rare earths, and uranium. The investment opportunities are vast, and they would help to meet growing demand in the United States and EU for critical supplies required to power the green energy transition and artificial intelligence revolution.

Ukraine also has one of the world’s largest reserves of highly fertile black soil—the source of the country’s moniker as the breadbasket of Europe. Ukraine can feed large parts of the world, currently producing enough food to feed some 100 million people with the potential to produce for 500 million more. Even as the war has raged, Ukraine at one point supplied 80 percent of the wheat distributed as aid by the U.N. World Food Program; just this month, it shipped 500 metric tons of grain in a humanitarian shipment to help feed post-Assad Syria. Thanks in part to a $284 million grant from the United States, Ukraine has already demined an area the size of Maryland and is restoring thousands of acres of agricultural land to its farmers.

Ukraine’s postwar economy will also build on an extremely dynamic information technology sector, which has tripled its exports from $2 billion in 2015 to $7 billion in 2023—higher than the pre-war peak.

Ukraine has five tech unicorns (privately held companies valued at more than $1 billion), which is more than any other country in Central and Eastern Europe; it also has one of the highest numbers of tech graduates per capita in Europe—more than Britain or France. The country has more than 5,000 tech companies, collectively employing nearly 300,000 developers—from start-ups to the five unicorns: GitLab, Grammarly, Genesis, People.ai, and Firefly Aerospace.

The war has vastly expanded Ukraine’s defense industrial base, which has grown tenfold in some sectors in response to Russia’s invasion. Once the war ends, Ukraine will have one of the most modern, competitive, and experienced defense sectors in Europe, able to take global market share from Russia and supply allies with NATO-standard munitions and equipment.

Galvanized by war, Ukraine’s drone developers, cyber warriors, hacktivists, and citizen programmers are powering digital innovation. Some of the most dynamic innovation ecosystems have developed in small, open economies facing a persistent, existential security threat: Think of Estonia, Israel, South Korea, and Taiwan, all of which have developed globally competitive innovation ecosystems, often closely linked to defense.­

That is one reason why the Biden administration supported U.S.-Ukrainian defense co-production on Ukrainian soil. In effect, security enables Ukraine’s economic resilience. Economic resilience reinforces Ukraine security.

Just as the United States has been a leader in military support—which helps Ukraine defend its economic and energy infrastructure from Russian attacks—it has also supported Ukraine’s future resilience. The Biden administration is rushing $825 million in emergency energy assistance to help fortify power generation, repair the grid, deploy more passive protection of energy infrastructure, provide backup power options, and restore gas storage facilities.

Much of this support is coming online now. And the Kyiv Independent reported that the first shipments of U.S.-produced liquefied natural gas to Ukraine arrived via Greece in late December—not only opening a new chapter in the U.S.-Ukrainian energy relationship, but also helping lay the foundation for a Ukrainian energy system that is free from Russian coercion.

And thanks to the generous support of Congress, the United States has catalyzed Ukraine’s economic comeback so that the country can stand on its own two feet, create an expanding market for U.S. goods, and provide a return on U.S. investments. This includes $74.7 million to support Ukraine’s export-oriented farmers and food processing facilities; $223 million in additional support to upgrade Ukraine’s Black Sea ports, rail links, and land border crossings; more than $105 million in new funding to train and equip Ukrainians for jobs in a postwar economy; and $35 million to help start one of the world’s largest infrastructure reconstruction efforts. In addition, the United States is contributing $20 billion in loans as part of a G-7 commitment to support the Ukrainian economy, serviced by the interest earned by frozen Russian sovereign assets.

Ukraine’s future membership in the EU and integration into global markets will yield massive dividends in terms of future U.S. economic security and private sector activity. Ukraine will be an essential partner as the United States and Europe emancipate themselves from reliance on energy, manufactured goods, and critical raw materials from adversaries such as China and Russia.

The World Bank estimates that Ukraine’s reconstruction will cost nearly $500 billion over 10 years, the largest such undertaking since post-World War II reconstruction. But unlike postwar Europe, where the United States spearheaded the reconstruction of 16 nations with the Marshall Plan, Ukraine’s recovery involves a broad coalition of contributors—many countries plus the international private sector—focused on rebuilding only one country.

Moreover, Europe’s reconstruction only began in 1948, three years after the cessation of hostilities, whereas our administration’s work in Ukraine has focused intensely on compressing the time between hot war and full-scale economic recovery.

The Pritzker plan—outlined by Penny Pritzker, the former U.S. special representative for Ukraine’s economic recovery—notes that addressing the challenges of economic recovery will require five conditions. First, a cohesive, cross-ministry strategy for reconstruction, project prioritization, and planning; second, the facilities to expand the number of shovel-ready infrastructure projects ready to absorb capital; third, more reform, stronger rule of law, and deeper anti-corruption efforts; fourth, greater capital mobilization in terms of insurance, equity finance, and debt; and, fifth, a concerted European effort to help create the conditions for refugees, internally displaced people, and veterans to return home and fully integrate into Ukraine’s economy.

Taken together, these five elements can be the fuel that powers a strong economic recovery and even renaissance. The Ukraine Donor Platform, the club of major donor countries that have joined to support reconstruction and recovery, must provide Ukraine with the steady hand that sets the overarching framework for reconstruction, recovery, and Euro-Atlantic integration in a way that catalyzes private-sector investment.

The Biden administration has been clear: Our support for Ukraine’s economic recovery isn’t charity, but an investment in U.S. economic and national security interests. It is about realigning Ukraine’s economic future—including supply chains, trade routes, business practices, and the immense innovative talent of the Ukrainian people—toward the EU, the United States, and global markets. Ukraine’s success will have a tangible impact on the United States’ bottom line.

Putin’s war is about reconstituting a dictatorial, corrupt empire that seeks to undermine the shared values of the United States and its partners in NATO, the EU, and throughout the world. Friends and adversaries around the world are watching to see how the United States responds.

[hussyknee]

Def a good idea to delete theculturedmarxist’s stuff, he’s also a big-time propagandist/genocide denier type. It sucks that some tankies have gotten bigger platforms recently by strike blogging.

But yeah the banana thing is insane, I *think* the original poster was using it as an example of the fact that a more just society in the US is necessarily going to be a less convenient one because convenience often comes at the expense of (domestic and international) labor exploitation, and “non-domestic crops being available year-round” is an example of a luxury that came out of said exploitation, which is A Point (though I might’ve picked something like Amazon same-day delivery to argue it…)

But then people ran with it and made it about either How Do We Stop Big Banana Through Socialism or Here’s How Bananas Can Still Win. Both at the dehumanizing expense of now-theoretical Latin American laborers of course 🙃

Oh shit that's what's happening? Tankies coasting in on strike blogging?? Gdi.

Yeah I think that was the original point too. The thing is, that US leftists keep centering US consumer demand in everything, like the entire system of global labour and resource exploitation by multinational conglomerates, aided and abetted by the IMF and World Bank and the entire colonial power matrix, can be solved by yelling at enough people about their consumption. For people who are so obsessed with class, it seems to consistently escape them that Global North consumers are also exploited and disempowered by the same oligopolies and monopolies that pay producers pennies on the dollar and sell for prices that smaller and entry-level companies can't compete with. Even as an example, bananas in the US are priced way lower than what's profitable, just to keep a monopoly of consumers. And because so many companies in the West don't pay working class people a fair wage, they have to consume the cheapest, most convenient food stuffs. So when you talk about people reducing consumption of bananas, you're asking people dependent on the cheapest nutrient sources to bear the biggest loss.

This is exactly what we mean by "no ethical consumption under capitalism". It doesn't mean we give up on the entire issue, it means that the systems of production cannot be manipulated by consumer boycotts and individual ethics. Even if one product was taken off the shelves, whatever supplanted it would be just as unethical for some group of people. It means that the solutions need to be implemented top-down, not bottom up. Global North governments need to better regulate corporate behaviour, prioritise the well-being of workers and ecological chains involving production and transport, prevent monopolies by regulating prices, and encourage and incentivize local food supply networks. And also, as some from Colombia said in a reblog about the cocaine industry, economic stress must be taken off developing nations by forgiving their IMF and World Bank loans so that they can invest the profits from their export industries in reforming agriculture and social welfare systems.

I literally do not understand why, when people directly impacted by these conditions have clear and cohesive demands and action plans, Western liberals and leftists need to come up with these completely abstract, impractical, ego-centric bullshit to create endless discourse over. They don't actually care about engaging with activists, grassroots organizations and unions in the Global South, because that involves interrogating their own paternalism, privilege and bias, and narrows the scope for the clout-chasing dunk economy.

[viexports]

How Indian rice manufacturers are shaping the global market

Indian rice has long held a place of pride in global kitchens, from the aromatic basmati grains that grace royal banquets to the nutritious non-basmati varieties that make up everyday meals worldwide. India is the world’s largest rice exporter, meeting over 40% of global rice demand (Source: FAO). Behind this success is the dedication and innovation of rice manufacturers in India, who are constantly adapting to meet international standards and market needs.

In this blog, we explore how Indian rice manufacturers are shaping the global market, promoting sustainability and securing India’s position as a rice exporting powerhouse.

Key factors driving Indian rice exports

Quality and Variety Rice manufacturers offer a diverse range of rice, from aromatic basmati to versatile non-basmati rice varieties. Each variety caters to different cuisines and preferences, ensuring steady demand in countries such as the United States, the Middle East, and Africa.

Competitive Pricing India's favorable agricultural conditions and cost-effective manufacturing processes enable competitive pricing. Combined with bulk export capabilities, this ensures that India remains a preferred supplier for global buyers.

Government policies and support Supportive government policies such as export incentives and trade agreements have contributed significantly to India's global dominance. For example, the recent removal of export restrictions on certain Indian rice varieties has boosted international trade opportunities.

Technological advances in rice manufacturing

Technology is transforming rice production in India, increasing efficiency and quality while reducing waste.

Modern milling equipment: Automated milling units maintain uniform grain size, texture and polish, which are critical to meeting international quality standards.

AI-powered sorting: Advanced sorting systems powered by artificial intelligence help eliminate impurities, ensuring that premium-grade rice reaches global markets.

Packaging innovations: Innovative vacuum-sealing and biodegradable packaging materials have made Indian rice more attractive to environmentally conscious buyers.

Rice manufacturers in India are adopting these advancements to maintain their competitive edge while meeting global priorities.

Sustainability initiatives by Indian manufacturers

As environmental concerns grow, rice exporters in India are adopting sustainable practices to meet global expectations.

Water-efficient farming: Techniques such as alternate wetting and drying (AWD) reduce water consumption, which is crucial for regions facing water scarcity.

Low carbon footprint: Adoption of renewable energy in processing units and adoption of eco-friendly logistics have reduced emissions in the rice supply chain.

Waste Utilization: By-products such as rice husk are being reused for bioenergy and building materials, thereby reducing waste and generating additional revenue streams.

These initiatives not only enhance India’s reputation but also align with the sustainability goals of global buyers.

Conclusion: The future of Indian rice on the global stage

The success of rice manufacturers in India is not just about meeting current demands, but also about shaping the future of the global rice trade. By prioritizing quality, leveraging technology, and adopting sustainable practices, Indian manufacturers have solidified their position as reliable partners in the global food supply chain.

As international markets evolve, India’s ability to adapt and innovate will continue to drive its leadership in the rice export industry, ensuring that Indian rice remains a staple in households around the world.

[top-leaders-in-india]

Business Opportunities for Agri & Food Processing Sector in Rajasthan: Col Rajyavardhan Rathore

Rajasthan, known for its rich cultural heritage and vast arid landscapes, is rapidly emerging as a hub for the agriculture and food processing sector. With its unique agricultural produce, favorable policies, and increasing investment in food processing infrastructure, the state offers a wealth of business opportunities for entrepreneurs and investors. Col Rajyavardhan Rathore, a prominent leader from Rajasthan, has consistently emphasized the importance of leveraging this sector to drive sustainable economic growth and uplift rural livelihoods.

Why Rajasthan is a Prime Destination for Agri & Food Processing Ventures

Rajasthan’s diverse agro-climatic zones and rich agricultural traditions make it a prime destination for ventures in agriculture and food processing. Key factors driving this growth include:

Abundant Agricultural Produce: Rajasthan is a leading producer of crops like millet, wheat, mustard, and pulses, as well as horticultural produce like guava, pomegranate, and ber (Indian jujube).

Strategic Location: Proximity to major markets like Delhi, Gujarat, and Maharashtra enhances logistics efficiency.

Government Support: Favorable policies and incentives to promote food processing industries.

Key Opportunities in Rajasthan’s Agri & Food Processing Sector

1. Cereal and Grain Processing

Rajasthan is the largest producer of bajra (pearl millet) and a significant producer of wheat and barley.

Opportunities include milling, packaging, and exporting these staples to domestic and international markets.

2. Oilseed Processing

The state is India’s top producer of mustard seeds, making it ideal for setting up mustard oil extraction and processing units.

Value-added products like mustard oil cakes for animal feed also present lucrative business opportunities.

3. Dairy Industry

With a strong livestock population, Rajasthan has immense potential in milk production and processing.

Opportunities include setting up dairy plants for products like butter, cheese, and flavored milk.

4. Horticulture-Based Businesses

Rajasthan is known for its high-quality pomegranates, kinnows, and dates.

Processing units for juices, jams, and dried fruits can tap into both domestic and export markets.

5. Spice Production and Processing

The state is a significant producer of spices like coriander, cumin, and fenugreek.

Setting up spice grinding and packaging units can cater to increasing demand from urban markets and exports.

6. Herbal and Medicinal Plants

Rajasthan’s arid climate supports the cultivation of medicinal plants like aloe vera, isabgol, and ashwagandha.

Opportunities include producing herbal extracts, essential oils, and ayurvedic medicines.

7. Organic Farming and Products

With growing awareness of health and sustainability, organic farming is gaining traction.

Export of organic grains, vegetables, and processed foods is a high-potential area.

8. Cold Storage and Logistics

Lack of adequate cold storage infrastructure poses a challenge, creating an opportunity for investment.

Businesses can also invest in modern logistics systems for efficient transportation of perishable goods.

Policy Support for Agri & Food Processing in Rajasthan

The Rajasthan government has introduced a host of initiatives to promote investment in the sector:

Rajasthan Agro-Processing, Agri-Business & Agri-Export Promotion Policy: Offering incentives like capital subsidies, tax rebates, and single-window clearances.

Mega Food Parks Scheme: Establishment of food parks to support processing industries with shared infrastructure.

Cluster-Based Development: Promotion of crop-specific clusters like the mustard cluster in Bharatpur and spice cluster in Jodhpur.

Subsidies for Startups: Financial support for agri-tech startups and small-scale food processing units.

The Role of Technology in Driving Growth

1. Precision Farming

Use of drones, IoT devices, and satellite imagery for better crop management.

2. Food Processing Automation

Adoption of automated equipment for sorting, grading, and packaging ensures efficiency and quality.

3. Blockchain in Agri-Supply Chains

Enhancing transparency and traceability from farm to fork.

4. Digital Marketplaces

Platforms like eNAM are helping farmers connect directly with buyers, ensuring better prices.

Col Rajyavardhan Rathore: Advocating for Agri-Business Growth

Col Rathore has been a strong advocate for leveraging Rajasthan’s agricultural strengths to create employment and boost the economy. His initiatives include:

Promoting Agri-Entrepreneurship: Encouraging youth to explore opportunities in modern farming and food processing.

Farmer Outreach Programs: Regular interactions with farmers to address challenges and introduce them to new technologies.

Policy Advocacy: Ensuring that government policies align with the needs of farmers and agri-businesses.

Challenges and Solutions in the Sector

Challenges

Water Scarcity: Dependence on rain-fed agriculture in many regions.

Post-Harvest Losses: Lack of proper storage and transportation facilities.

Market Access: Difficulty in connecting small farmers to larger markets.

Solutions

Drip Irrigation and Water Conservation: Efficient irrigation methods to tackle water scarcity.

Investment in Cold Chains: Preventing wastage of perishable goods.

Digital Platforms for Farmers: Expanding access to markets through e-commerce and digital supply chains.

A Promising Future for Agri & Food Processing in Rajasthan

Rajasthan is poised to become a leader in the agriculture and food processing sector, thanks to its diverse produce, supportive policies, and visionary leadership. With growing investments and technological advancements, the state offers endless opportunities for entrepreneurs and businesses.

Under the guidance of leaders like Col Rajyavardhan Rathore, Rajasthan is moving steadily toward a future where its agricultural wealth is fully harnessed to benefit farmers, consumers, and the economy at large.

[seairexim]

Soybean Export from India: Trends, Data, & Market Outlook for 2025

India's agricultural exports continue to gain momentum, with soybean standing as a key contributor. Known for its high nutritional value and diverse industrial applications, soybeans play a pivotal role in the global agri-commodity market. As the world’s demand for plant-based proteins and sustainable oils increases, India's position as a significant player in soybean exports strengthens. This article delves into the current trends in soybean export from India, examines soybean export data, highlights key soybean exporters in India, and explores major soybean-exporting countries for 2024-2025.

The Landscape of Soybean Export from India

India has emerged as a prominent exporter of soybeans, contributing significantly to global trade. Factors such as robust agricultural policies, advancements in farming techniques, and a focus on export-oriented production have bolstered India's soybean export capabilities.

In the 2024-2025 period, soybean exports from India are expected to grow due to increasing international demand. Indian soybeans are sought after for their quality, competitive pricing, and adherence to international standards. The primary export destinations for Indian soybeans include Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and European countries.

Soybean Export Data for 2024-2025

Tracking soybean export data reveals significant insights into India’s performance in the global market.

Volume and Value of Exports: India exported approximately 2.5 million metric tons of soybeans in the fiscal year 2023-2024, generating over $1.2 billion in revenue. The 2024-2025 projections suggest a 10-12% growth, driven by increasing demand from new and existing markets.

Major Importers of Indian Soybeans:

Indonesia and Vietnam: These countries use Indian soybeans primarily for feed and food processing industries.

United Arab Emirates (UAE): A significant importer due to its booming food industry and demand for plant-based products.

European Union (EU): Particularly Germany and the Netherlands, where soybeans are used for biofuels and plant-based protein products.

Export Growth Drivers:

India’s strategic position in Asia ensures shorter shipping times to key markets.

Increased global preference for non-GMO soybeans, a segment where India has an advantage.

Key Soybean Exporters in India

India’s soybean export industry is supported by numerous stakeholders, including farmers, processing companies, and export houses top soybean exporters in India are.

SOPA (Soybean Processors Association of India): SOPA plays a vital role in promoting soybean exports from India. It ensures the quality and branding of Indian soybeans, making them competitive in global markets.

Major Exporting Companies:

ITC Limited: Known for its robust supply chain and adherence to quality standards.

Adani Wilmar: A significant player in agri-exports, including soybeans and soy-derived products.

Ruchi Soya Industries: One of India's largest exporters, supplying non-GMO soybeans globally.

Emerging Players: Smaller exporters and agri-tech startups have also entered the market, leveraging technology to enhance productivity and streamline exports.

India’s Position Among Soybean Exporting Countries

Globally, India ranks among the top 10 soybean exporting countries. However, countries like Brazil, the United States, and Argentina dominate the export landscape.

Global Competitors:

Brazil: The world’s largest soybean exporter, primarily supplying China.

United States: A major exporter with advanced farming technology and extensive trade networks.

Argentina: Known for its high-quality soymeal exports.

India’s Competitive Edge:

Organic and non-GMO soybeans.

Competitive pricing compared to Western exporters.

Proximity to Asian and Middle Eastern markets.

Challenges in Competing Globally: While India has advantages, challenges such as inconsistent yield, fluctuating prices, and logistical issues need addressing to solidify its global standing.

Emerging Trends and Opportunities in Soybean Export

The soybean industry is undergoing transformation due to changing consumer preferences and technological advancements. Key trends for 2024-2025 include:

Shift to Plant-Based Diets: The rise of veganism and plant-based diets globally is driving demand for soy products, including tofu, soy milk, and soy protein isolates.

Sustainability and Traceability: Exporters focusing on sustainable farming and traceability in supply chains will have a competitive edge in international markets.

Government Support: Initiatives such as export incentives, enhanced logistics, and trade agreements are expected to boost soybean exports.

Value-Added Soy Products: Diversifying into soy-derived products like soymeal, soy oil, and soy protein can open new revenue streams for Indian exporters.

Challenges Facing Soybean Export from India

Despite its growth potential, the industry faces several hurdles:

Climate Change: Unpredictable weather patterns can impact crop yields.

Infrastructure Bottlenecks: Limited storage and transportation facilities hinder efficient exports.

Price Volatility: Global soybean prices are influenced by geopolitical and economic factors, impacting Indian exports.

Addressing these challenges through policy reforms and industry collaboration will be critical for sustained growth.

Future Outlook for Soybean Export from India

The future of soybean exports from India looks promising. With the global demand for soybeans expected to rise by 15-20% in the next decade, India has the opportunity to enhance its market share. Key strategies for growth include:

Investing in sustainable farming practices.

Strengthening trade relations with emerging markets like Africa and Latin America.

Promoting value-added soy products through branding and innovation.

Conclusion

Soybean export from India are poised for remarkable growth in the 2024-2025 period. By leveraging its strengths in quality production and strategic geographic positioning, India can expand its footprint in the global soybean market. However, addressing challenges like climate change, infrastructure, and price volatility will be essential for realizing its full potential. With the concerted efforts of farmers, exporters, and policymakers, India is set to cement its position as a leading player in the global soybean trade.

[colonelrajyavardhanrathore]

Rajasthan MSME Policy 2024: A New Era for Entrepreneurs by Col Rajyavardhan Rathore

In a landmark move to empower small businesses and foster economic growth, the Rajasthan MSME Policy 2024 has been introduced under the guidance of Colonel Rajyavardhan Rathore. This policy aims to position Rajasthan as a leader in the Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSME) sector by providing robust support, financial incentives, and a conducive ecosystem for entrepreneurs.

The Importance of MSMEs in Rajasthan

MSMEs are the backbone of Rajasthan’s economy, contributing significantly to employment and GDP. With their presence in sectors like handicrafts, textiles, agriculture, and technology, MSMEs have immense potential to drive growth and innovation. The Rajasthan MSME Policy 2024 seeks to address challenges faced by small businesses and unlock their full potential.

Vision of Col Rajyavardhan Rathore

Col Rajyavardhan Rathore envisions MSMEs as engines of Rajasthan’s economic progress. Speaking at the launch, he remarked: “MSMEs are not just businesses; they are dreams of hardworking individuals. This policy is a promise to support their aspirations and make Rajasthan a hub for entrepreneurial excellence.”

Key Objectives of the Rajasthan MSME Policy 2024

Economic Empowerment: Strengthen the MSME sector to boost Rajasthan’s GDP.

Employment Generation: Create sustainable jobs across urban and rural areas.

Ease of Doing Business: Simplify processes and remove bureaucratic hurdles.

Skill Development: Equip entrepreneurs and workers with the latest skills.

Sustainability: Promote green practices and energy-efficient solutions.

Highlights of the Rajasthan MSME Policy 2024

1. Financial Support

Subsidies and Incentives: Up to 50% subsidy on capital investment for new enterprises.

Low-Interest Loans: Special credit schemes through state-backed financial institutions.

Tax Exemptions: Relaxation in GST and other state taxes for a specified period.

2. Infrastructure Development

Industrial Clusters: Development of MSME-dedicated zones in key cities like Jaipur, Udaipur, and Jodhpur.

Common Facility Centers (CFCs): Shared spaces with advanced tools and technology.

Digital Infrastructure: High-speed internet and IT support for MSMEs.

3. Skill Training and Capacity Building

Partnerships with educational institutions to introduce MSME-focused courses.

Regular workshops on digital marketing, export readiness, and quality control.

Mentorship Programs with industry experts to guide budding entrepreneurs.

4. Streamlining Processes

Single-Window Clearance: Speedy approvals for setting up businesses.

Simplified Regulations: Reduction in compliance requirements for small enterprises.

Digital Portals: Online systems for registrations, tax filing, and grievance redressal.

5. Promoting Innovation

Research and Development Grants: Funding for MSMEs working on innovative products and solutions.

Technology Adoption: Subsidies for adopting automation and digital tools.

Startup Incubation Centers: Support for MSMEs transitioning into startups.

6. Export Promotion

Global Market Access: Partnerships with trade bodies for export opportunities.

Trade Fairs and Expos: Participation in national and international exhibitions.

Export Subsidies: Financial support for logistics and international marketing.

Sectors Targeted by the Policy

1. Handicrafts and Textiles

Strengthening Rajasthan’s traditional crafts through modern techniques and marketing support.

2. Agri-Based Industries

Encouraging food processing, organic farming, and value-added products.

3. Renewable Energy

Promoting MSMEs in solar panel manufacturing and other green technologies.

4. Technology and IT

Support for tech startups and MSMEs working in AI, software, and digital solutions.

Impact of the Rajasthan MSME Policy 2024

Economic Growth

An expected 30% rise in MSME contributions to the state GDP by 2026.

Increased revenue through exports and enhanced domestic production.

Job Creation

2 lakh new jobs to be created in urban and rural areas.

Empowerment of women and marginalized communities through focused programs.

Ease of Doing Business

Simplified processes to attract 5,000+ new MSME registrations annually.

Global Recognition

Enhanced visibility for Rajasthan’s MSMEs in international markets.

Col Rathore’s Commitment to MSMEs

Col Rajyavardhan Rathore has always championed policies that drive progress and innovation. His leadership in shaping the MSME Policy 2024 reflects his belief in the entrepreneurial spirit of Rajasthan.

In his words: “With this policy, we are not just supporting businesses; we are building dreams, livelihoods, and a prosperous Rajasthan.”

A Bright Future for MSMEs in Rajasthan

The Rajasthan MSME Policy 2024 is a game-changer for small businesses. By addressing key challenges and providing holistic support, it aims to transform the state into a hub of entrepreneurship and innovation. With Col Rajyavardhan Rathore’s vision and leadership, this policy is set to empower thousands of entrepreneurs and contribute significantly to Rajasthan’s economic growth.

[rajasthan-political-leader]

Rajasthan Export Promotions 2024: A Visionary Initiative by Col Rajyavardhan Rathore

Rajasthan, a state known for its rich heritage, craftsmanship, and industrial potential, is poised to become a major player in global trade with the introduction of the Rajasthan Export Promotions 2024 policy. Spearheaded by Col Rajyavardhan Rathore, this initiative aims to boost the state’s exports, empower local artisans, and attract foreign investments.

In this article, we explore the highlights, objectives, and potential impact of this policy on Rajasthan’s economy and its global standing.

Why Rajasthan Needs an Export Promotion Policy

Rajasthan has long been a hub of unique goods such as handcrafted textiles, gems, jewelry, and agricultural products. However, the state’s export potential has often been underutilized due to logistical challenges, lack of infrastructure, and limited global outreach.

The Export Promotions 2024 policy addresses these gaps and sets a roadmap for Rajasthan to become a competitive exporter on the global stage.

Col Rajyavardhan Rathore’s Leadership in Export Growth

As a leader with a vision for Rajasthan’s economic prosperity, Col Rathore emphasized: “This policy is not just about boosting exports; it’s about uplifting our artisans, industrialists, and farmers while placing Rajasthan firmly on the global trade map.”

Key Objectives of Rajasthan Export Promotions 2024

Increase Export Revenue: Achieve a significant rise in Rajasthan’s export contributions to India’s GDP.

Diversify Export Categories: Expand beyond traditional sectors to include IT, renewable energy equipment, and processed food.

Empower Local Businesses: Provide small and medium enterprises (SMEs) with access to international markets.

Sustainability: Promote eco-friendly products and sustainable practices in exports.

Highlights of the Export Promotions 2024 Policy

1. Infrastructure Development

Export Hubs: Establishment of dedicated export hubs in Jaipur, Jodhpur, and Udaipur.

Logistics Support: Improved connectivity through highways, railways, and air cargo facilities.

Special Economic Zones (SEZs): Expansion of SEZs for industries like textiles, gems, and ceramics.

2. Financial Support

Export Subsidies: Incentives for exporters, including subsidies on freight charges.

Credit Facilities: Low-interest loans and credit schemes for MSMEs.

Tax Benefits: Exemptions on specific export-oriented services and products.

3. Digitalization and E-commerce

Online Export Platforms: Launch of a state-specific portal for exporters to showcase and sell their products globally.

E-Commerce Training: Workshops for businesses to leverage global e-commerce giants like Amazon and Alibaba.

4. Skill Development and Awareness

Training Programs: Upskilling artisans and entrepreneurs in global market trends.

Export Awareness Drives: Seminars and expos to connect businesses with international buyers.

5. Focus on Key Export Sectors

Handicrafts and Textiles: Reviving traditional crafts for global appeal.

Gems and Jewelry: Strengthening Rajasthan’s leadership in the global gemstone trade.

Agriculture and Food Processing: Exporting organic and processed food products.

Renewable Energy Equipment: Leveraging Rajasthan’s solar energy expertise.

Impact of the Policy on Rajasthan

Economic Growth

An anticipated 25% increase in export revenues by 2026.

Boost in employment opportunities in export-centric industries.

Empowerment of Artisans and MSMEs

Enhanced income for local artisans, weavers, and entrepreneurs.

Global recognition for Rajasthan’s traditional and modern industries.

Global Standing

Positioning Rajasthan as a preferred destination for international buyers and investors.

Strengthening Rajasthan’s brand as a hub of quality and innovation.

Col Rajyavardhan Rathore’s Vision for the Future

Col Rathore envisions Rajasthan as a global export leader that balances tradition with innovation. In his words: “This policy is a blend of Rajasthan’s cultural roots and modern aspirations. It’s about creating a thriving economy while preserving our heritage.”

The Road Ahead

The Rajasthan Export Promotions 2024 policy sets the stage for the state’s transformation into an export powerhouse. By focusing on infrastructure, technology, and talent, this initiative will create a sustainable, globally competitive ecosystem.

Conclusion

Rajasthan Export Promotions 2024 is more than just a policy — it’s a commitment to progress and prosperity. Under Col Rajyavardhan Rathore’s visionary leadership, Rajasthan is poised to make its mark on the world stage while empowering its people and industries.

[notwiselybuttoowell]

Hundreds of lobbyists for industrial agriculture are attending the Cop29 climate summit in Baku, analysis shows.

They include representatives from some of the world’s largest agribusiness companies including the Brazilian meatpacker JBS, the animal pharmaceuticals company Elanco, and the food giant PepsiCo, as well as trade groups representing the food sector.

Overall, 204 agriculture delegates have accessed the talks this year, analysis by DeSmog and the Guardian reveals. While the total number has dropped compared with the record highs at Cop28, the figures show climate Cops remain a top priority for businesses working in agriculture, a sector that accounts for up to a third of global greenhouse gas emissions.

Food sector lobbyists remain highly influential, and have travelled to Baku as part of country delegations from Brazil, Russia and Australia, among others. This year, nearly 40% of delegates travelled to the summit with country badges, giving them privileged access to diplomatic negotiations, up from 30% at Cop28, and just 5% at Cop27.

Delegates from the meat and dairy sector sent 52 delegates to the summit this year, with 20 travelling with Brazil’s government, the analysis found. They outnumbered the delegation of the Caribbean island of Barbados, which in July was devastated by Hurricane Beryl, a disaster linked to climate breakdown.

Meat and dairy producers are coming under greater scrutiny due to increasing pollution from cattle and sheep, which emit about a third of the global output of methane. Farming also relies on synthetic fertilisers that are both fossil fuel-based and emit greenhouse gases, and drive deforestation.

But while studies point to the need for a drastic drop in meat and dairy production and a shift to climate-friendly farming, the agribusiness industry has lobbied hard against tougher environmental laws, in the EU, the US and at climate summits.

An Lambrechts, a senior campaign strategist from Greenpeace International, said there was a clear “conflict of interest” between big agriculture’s presence at the talks and the need for climate action.

“We see the same conflict of interest with the fossil fuel industry and how they act to drive the world away from the scope of actions and solutions that are needed to fight climate change and address its impacts,” she said.

Brazil, the host of next year’s climate summit, was a major funnel for agricultural giants this year. That has sparked concerns over the sway agribusiness may hold over Cop30, which many see as an opportunity for ambitious food systems reform.

The Brazilian government brought in 35 agriculture lobbyists, including more than 20 representatives of the meat companies JBS, BRF and Marfrig, as well as powerful industry groups such as the Association of Brazilian Beef Exporters.