#India playing XI | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

dfoxmarketing · 1 year ago

Text

IND vs AUS World Cup 2023 : Australia win toss , opts to bat first

India vs Australia , ICC World Cup 2023:

At the MA Chidambaram Stadium, Australia captain Pat Cummins won the toss and opted to bat first as his team and the hosts India began respective 2023 World Cup campaigns. The ancient rivalry between India and Australia is ready to write a new chapter at the Chepauk, a stadium that has hosted a number of legendary matches. If the weather cooperates, we might be in for a banger of a match that lives up to the Sunday blockbuster billing.

Shubman Gill’s Dengue Diagnosis Forces Lineup Changes

India will likely be compelled to alter the hierarchy at the top. Shubman Gill, who was diagnosed with dengue in the days leading up to this match, hasn’t even travelled to the Chepauk Stadium with the squad, it turns out. Ishan Kishan and Rohit Sharma will most likely start the batting. Gill arrived in Chennai wearing a mask and suffering with a mild temperature. Additionally, was identified as having dengue after missing India’s first optional session on Thursday.

Although head coach Rahul Dravid hasn’t fully ruled him out, it is doubtful that he would play considering that the body takes a long time to recover from the disease’s initial symptoms before breaking out of weakness. Ishan Kishan, who has had some success as the opener while also achieving the quickest ODI double century, will get another chance to bat in Gill’s place.

Also Read: Bangladesh vs Afghanistan World Cup 2023: Bangladesh Lose Two Wickets in chase of 157

The No. 8 puzzle is also true. It is legitimate to be tempted to move forward with either Shardul Thakur or Ravichandran Ashwin. The black-soil surface in Chennai, though, could just give the off-spinner the go-ahead. After all, Ashwin has consistently shown to be quite a nuisance at Chepauk.

Key pointers surrounding the India vs Australia World Cup clash:

In the history of the 50-over World Cup, India has only defeated Australia four times.

Shubman Gill will be out with dengue for India, while Ishan Kishan to be promoted to opener with Rohit Sharma.

Only Virat Kohli has an ODI century in Chepauk among the current Indian team.

Australia has lost 4 of their past 5 one-day international matches.

As the second spinner, Kuldeep Yadav is set to join Ravichandran Ashwin in India’s playing XI.

Australia has won all three of its prior matches in Chepauk, remaining unbeaten in World Cup games there.

Follow Digital Fox Media for latest sports news.

#dfoxmarketing #digitalfoxmedia #ICC WORLD CUP 2023 #INDIA VS AUSTRALIA #ISHAN KISHAN #KEY POINTERS #KULDEEP YADAV #MA CHIDAMBARAM STADIUM #ODI #ONE-DAY INTERNATIONAL #PAT CUMMINS #PLAYING XI #RAHUL DRAVID #RAVICHANDRAN ASHWIN #ROHIT SHARMA #SHARDUL THAKUR

1 note · View note

cnnbbcurdu · 1 year ago

Text

India vs. Pakistan Asia Cup 2023 Clash: Everything You Should Know

India vs. Pakistan Asia Cup 2023 Clash: Everything You Should Know Traditional rivals Pakistan and India will come face to face in the Asia Cup 2023 on Saturday, September 2, in Kandy. Pakistan began its Asia Cup 2023 campaign on a high with a massive 238-run win over Nepal on Wednesday. Meanwhile, India will kick start their tournament with a match against their traditional rivals…

View On WordPress

#Asia Cup #Asia Cup 2023 #India vs. Pakistan #India vs. Pakistan Asia Cup 2023 #playing XI

0 notes

literary-illuminati · 2 months ago

Text

Third Quarter of 2024 Book Reviews

July

33. Rose/House by Arkady Martine 34. Children of Memory by Adrian Tchaikovsky 35. To Say Nothing Of The Dog by Connie Willis 36. Life Does Not Allow Us To Meet by He Xi 37. Montress, Volume Six: The Vow by Marjorie Liu and Sana Takeda 38. Play It As It Lays by Joan Didion

August

39. Inglorious Empire: What the British Did To India by Shashi Tharoor 40. Dead Silence by S. A. Barnes 41. Japan 1941: Countdown to Infamy by Eri Hotta 42. The Golden Enclaves by Naomi Novik 43. Witch King by Martha Wells

September

44. The Archive Undying by Emma Mieko Candon 45. Monstress, Vol. 7: Devourer by Marjorie Liu and Sana Takeda 46. Lone Women by Victor LaValle 47. City of Last Chances by Adrian Tchaikovsky 48. My Heart is a Chainsaw by Stephen Graham Jones

You can also seem them all on my Goodreads

#meta #book review #2024

19 notes · View notes

dertaglichedan · 1 month ago

Text

Putin Hosts BRICS Leaders, Showing He Is Far From Isolated

(Bloomberg) -- President Vladimir Putin is playing host to Russia’s biggest gathering of world leaders since the invasion of Ukraine and using the BRICS summit to show the US and its allies that he’s no pariah.

With Russian troops advancing in eastern Ukraine and evidence of growing war fatigue among some of Kyiv’s allies, the Kremlin is seizing its opportunity to cast Putin as standing up to the West in attempting to reshape the global order. The US and its Group of Seven partners dismiss the argument, though it’s a message that resonates with some countries of the emerging world.

Leaders of 32 countries, as well as top officials of regional organizations and United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, will attend the three-day summit starting Tuesday in Kazan, Kremlin foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov told reporters.

Chinese President Xi Jinping, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa are joining Putin alongside leaders of the new BRICS members, Iran, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates and Ethiopia. Putin plans bilateral meetings with many of them, as well as with guests such as Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva on Sunday canceled his plans to attend the summit after suffering a head injury in an accident at his home. Officials said he’ll participate by video link.

While BRICS favors greater use of national currencies in bilateral trade, members including India reject attempts to promote China’s yuan as an alternative reserve currency.

***WAKE UP!! This is NOT good for the US Dollar..

10 notes · View notes

darkmaga-returns · 23 days ago

Text

“Potemkinism” accounts for why many have false perceptions that Russia mediated between them.

There’s a perception among many in the Alt-Media Community (AMC) that Russian mediation was responsible for the meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Kazan during last month’s BRICS Summit. Correspondingly, it’s also assumed that Russia’s excellent ties with both enabled it to play a role in bringing about the border de-escalation deal that preceded their meeting, the claim of which was passed off as fact by Pepe Escobar in his Sputnik column.

As it turns out, just an hour or so before that piece was published, Russian Ambassador Denis Alipov declared the following during a press briefing on the outcome of that summit from 0:55 of this video here: “We, again as far as I know, have not played any role in organizing that meeting.” He’s Russia’s top diplomat in Delhi so he’d know, and he even said in February 2022 that “We have no mediation plans for a simple reason: both sides view the territorial dispute between them as a purely bilateral matter.”

This principled position respects those two’s hard-earned sovereignty and recognizes their independent agency in International Relations, which are all the more important for the world’s two most populous countries considering India’s colonial history and China’s Century of Humiliation. They’ve since risen to become leading forces in the global systemic transition to multipolarity and accordingly don’t need anyone to help them resolve their disputes with one another after obtaining such premier influence.

3 notes · View notes

daddyscore · 1 year ago

Text

Ravindra Jadeja is angry at the unfair treatment of Ishan Kishan

With the Board of Control for Cricket in India preparing a contract extension for head coach Rahul Dravid after the ICC World Cup 2023, the chief of the National Cricket Academy and batting icon VVS Laxman coached a second-string Indian side for the entire five-match T20I series against Australia. Under the leadership of new captain Suryakumar Yadav, a second-string India side defeated Australia 4-1 in the bilateral series.

Superstar Shreyas Iyer, who was rested for the first three T20Is, joined the Indian squad as Suryakumar's deputy for the final two encounters against Australia. While Iyer was roped in as the No. 3 batter for the 4th and 5th T20I, India decided to release Ishan Kishan from its playing XI after the third encounter of the five-game series. When Ravindra Jadeja got asked, “Was Kishan really that tired after three matches?’ Jaddu said, “There was a series right after the World Cup. Ishan Kishan played three matches and went home.

Was he really that tired after three matches that he needed rest? He didn't even play a lot of games at the World Cup. He deserved his spot in the playing XI for the first few World Cup matches. How many Indian players have scored a double century on a good day? He can change the game on his own. When will he get ready? Will you keep him on trial all the time? In the last two years, how many games has he played? This problem of Indian cricket is not of today; it is very old that we don’t select players but reject them.”

#ravindra jadeja #ishan kishan #iccworldcup #India #Sports #News #social media

9 notes · View notes

stoookes · 5 months ago

Note

OMG OMG digging real deep into VK's career here, and it turns out that in late 2008, Australia toured India. So you know how before the actual matches in the series happen, there's a few tour/warm-up matches happen? like playing against a county team, or something like that. so anyways in 2008 there was an unofficial tour match between australia and the Indian board president's XI. So basically the Indian team featured mostly fresh faces. Both Rohit and Virat played that test, and both of them scored 105. What makes their innings so remarkable is that all the Australian stars/regulars were playing too. The bowling lineup consisted of Brett Lee, Mitch Johnson, Stuart Clark and Peter Siddle. Also other Aussie stalwarts like Ricky Ponting, Michael Clarke, Matthew Hayden, Brad Haddin, etc. played that match. There aren't any records of any altercations happening during this match, but can't you just see it being bad-tempered in Omegaverse? The Aussies being pissed off that a 19 y/o omega did well against them. VK would have copped it from the Aus players, and he would have given it back as good as he got. Also Rohit was there! And put up a mammoth partnership with VK! Which means Rohit would have defended/backed up VK when the sledging got worse!

Oh Rohit so goes to Vk's defense only to have VK chirp, 'I can handle these slow bowlers,' xD but I do love this

2 notes · View notes

tajanews247 · 10 months ago

Text

रोहित शर्मा को तीसरे नंबर पर भेजो, शुभमन गिल को... विजाग टेस्ट से पहले पूर्व सेलेक्टर की राय

नई दिल्ली. भारत और इंग्लैंड (India vs England) के बीच दूसरा टेस्ट विशाखापट्टनम में खेला जाएगा. दूसरे टेस्ट में टीम इंडिया की प्लेइंग इलेवन में कई बदलाव देखने को मिलेंगे. शुभमन गिल (Shubman Gill) तीसरे नंबर पर बल्लेबाजी करते हुए लगातार फ्लॉ�� हो रहे हैं. पूर्व सेलेक्टर सरनदीप सिंह ने कहा है कि रोहित शर्मा को तीसरे नंबर पर बैटिंग करनी चाहिए. वहीं, गिल को ओपनिंग. सरनदीप सिंह ने हिन्दुस्तान टाइम्स से…

View On WordPress

0 notes

mariacallous · 10 months ago

Text

As global outrage grows over Israel’s military campaign in the Gaza Strip, China has focused on harnessing the widening divide between Washington’s and the global south’s stances on the war to boost Beijing’s own foreign-policy ambitions.

Over the course of the Israel-Hamas war, China has been careful to stay on the sidelines, wary of miring itself in a spiraling conflict or jeopardizing its regional ties. But as Washington faces fierce pushback over its support of Israel, Beijing has also seized the opportunity to align itself with the so-called global south—a collection of dozens of countries, including Brazil, India, South Africa, and Pakistan—which has overwhelmingly condemned Israel’s actions, sharply diverging from the U.S. position.

China is “mostly hanging back and letting the United States collect abuse,” said Jon Alterman, the director of the Middle East program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “The only interest China’s pursuing in the Middle East is watching while a larger division opens between the U.S. and large parts of the global south,” he added.

From the beginning, China’s approach to the Israel-Hamas war has been characterized by caution. Chinese President Xi Jinping, for example, waited nearly two weeks before weighing in after Hamas’s initial Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel, while early government statements refrained from even naming Hamas—a response that angered Israeli officials. In the months since, China has positioned itself as a peacemaker, calling for a cease-fire and a Palestinian state without going so far as to directly involve itself in the conflict.

China has “clearly eschewed any substantive role in the ongoing conflict,” Patricia Kim, a fellow at the Brookings Institution, told Foreign Policy in an email. While Beijing wants to portray itself as a regional power broker, she said, “it has zero interest in serving as a security provider or directly intervening in challenging situations that might jeopardize its relationships in the region.”

These dynamics are evident in the Red Sea, where months of Houthi attacks against commercial shipping, undertaken in what the Houthis describe as solidarity with Palestinians, have disrupted global trade. Yet even as a growing number of countries dispatch ships to safeguard the corridor, China has resisted intervening with its own naval forces. The furthest Beijing has gone in getting involved is privately pressing Iran—which backs the Houthis—to step in, Reuters reported, although Iranian officials have denied the reports.

Beijing’s approach stands in sharp contrast to that of Washington, which has not only long been one of Israel’s staunchest supporters since the nation’s start, backing the country with billions in military aid, but has also acted as the country’s primary defender on the international stage since the war began, wielding the United States’ veto on the United Nations Security Council to block resolutions backed by dozens of countries—including many in the global south, as well as China—calling for a cease-fire. The Biden administration has also taken action in the Red Sea, launching strikes against the Houthis in Yemen and mobilizing an international task force to help ensure freedom of navigation in the corridor.

Yet as Israel’s military campaign in Gaza inflicts a devastating humanitarian toll—Israeli forces have killed as many as 26,000 Palestinians in Gaza since the beginning of the war, according to the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry—much of the world has grown increasingly frustrated with, and disillusioned by, Washington’s unwavering support for Israel. More than half a million people in Gaza currently face “catastrophic levels of acute food insecurity,” the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification warned in December.

And Beijing has been trying to capitalize on the divide. “They feel that this is going to further undermine the U.S. in the eyes of the rest of the world, in the parts of the world that they care about,” said Eric Olander, the co-founder of the China Global South Project. “This plays right into their strategy for the Chinese—to show how isolated the Americans are, to show how they’re out of sync with the rest of the world, and just show the hypocrisy of the Americans.”

“The Chinese are playing this, in my view, quite skillfully in terms of pursuing their own foreign policy and promoting some of the values that they’re trying to say about the shortcomings of the U.S-led international order,” he added.

As part of this strategy, China has publicly framed itself as a peacemaker, proposing a five-point peace plan and calling for a Israeli-Palestinian peace conference. In October, Beijing dispatched its regional envoy to Qatar and Egypt to urge a cease-fire; since then, it has pledged some $4 million in humanitarian aid to Gaza, hosted a delegation of Arab and Muslim ministers, and participated in a virtual summit of the BRICS bloc (then comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) over the conflict.

“China has been working tirelessly to promote the cessation of hostilities and the restoration of peace,” Chinese U.N. Ambassador Zhang Jun said at a Security Council briefing during the first month of the war. “China will continue to stand on the side of international fairness and justice, on the side of international law, and on the side of the legitimate aspirations of the Arab and Islamic world.”

During his broader tour of Africa in January, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi also leveraged his trip to Egypt—one of the mediators in the Israel-Hamas war—to reiterate calls for a cease-fire and Palestinian state.

Yet experts say that Beijing’s actions are mostly performative, resulting in few concrete outcomes. The November BRICS summit, for one, failed to generate a joint statement or practical road map forward, as Mark Leonard of the European Council on Foreign Relations noted in Foreign Affairs. China’s proposed peace plan also charged the U.N. Security Council—and not Beijing—with the responsibility of resolving the conflict, according to the Brookings Institution.

China’s seriousness on mediating the Israel-Hamas war is just “smoke and mirrors,” wrote Ahmed Aboudouh, a nonresident fellow at the Atlantic Council, in December, citing “the opaqueness of China’s diplomatic language and the insignificant sum of money provided by the world’s second-largest economy” to Gaza.

Rather than miring itself in the conflict, Beijing has focused on making digs at Washington and contrasting the two countries’ positions, part of its bid to cast doubt on the Biden administration’s global credibility. These efforts have been on full display at the U.N. Security Council, where China vetoed a U.S. draft resolution in October after criticizing it for not calling for a cease-fire; Russia also vetoed the resolution.

The United States “introduced a new draft resolution that set aside the consensus of the members,” Zhang said. Even after other council members—including Beijing—proposed amendments, he said, Washington ignored their “major concerns” and introduced a draft resolution that “confuses right and wrong.”

Later in December, after Washington vetoed a Security Council draft resolution pushing for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire, Beijing again leveraged the vote to position itself alongside the global south and single out Washington’s position. As one of the resolution’s nearly 100 co-sponsors, Beijing felt “great disappointment and regret that the draft has been vetoed by the US,” Zhang said. “All this shows once again what [a] double standard is.”

State media echoed these sentiments, further drawing attention to the diverging U.S. and Chinese positions. “It is contradictory to tolerate the continuation of the conflict while claiming to care about the safety and humanitarian needs of the people in Gaza,” the Global Times said, referring to the U.S. veto. “It is self-deceptive to advocate preventing the spillover of the conflict while tolerating its continuation.”

More recently, Beijing has also aligned itself with the global south in one of the clearest cases of outrage over Israel’s actions: South Africa’s genocide case against Israel in the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Although the ICJ has no way to enforce its rulings, South Africa’s case reflects the growing international pressure building against Israel, which has dismissed the charges as “false” and “outrageous.”

While the ICJ has not yet ruled on the question of whether Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, and likely won’t do so for years, last Friday, it responded to South Africa’s request for the court to command an emergency suspension of Israel’s military campaign. In its ruling, the ICJ ordered Israel to “take all measures” to minimize harm to civilians in Gaza.

After the decision was announced, Chinese state media expressed hope that it would push “some major countries to stop turning a blind eye” to Israel’s actions in Gaza. The Biden administration, in contrast, reiterated its position that Pretoria’s genocide allegations were “unfounded,” although it also said the ICJ ruling was in line with its own calls for Israel to ensure civilians’ safety.

China has long prioritized cultivating political and economic ties with countries across the global south, with Wang, the foreign minister, most recently wrapping up his first foreign trip of 2024 by visiting Egypt, Tunisia, Togo, and Ivory Coast. His trip marks the 34th straight year that a Chinese foreign minister has made Africa the destination of their first global trip of the year; Wang traveled to Brazil and Jamaica afterward.

“China decided to treat Israel as collateral damage, compared to more than 50 countries in the global south,” said Aboudouh, the Atlantic Council expert. “China wants these countries’ support for its own vision—for global governance and its strategic priorities.”

5 notes · View notes

allfifaworldcup · 2 years ago

Text

DC vs MI Dream11 Prediction Today Match 16, Dream11 Team Today, Fantasy Cricket Tips

Last Update on: April 11th, 2023 at 11:38 am DC vs MI Dream11 Prediction Today Match, Dream11 Team Today, Fantasy Cricket Tips, Playing XI, Pitch Report, Injury Update of match 16 of IPL 2023 match between Delhi Capitals and Mumbai Indians. DC vs MI IPL 2023 Match 16 Details: Match: Delhi Capitals vs Mumbai Indians Date: 11th April 2023 Venue: Arun Jaitley Stadium, Delhi, India For all the…

View On WordPress

7 notes · View notes

hitting-for-six · 1 year ago

Text

Curious squad announcements

England squad for ODI series against New Zealand: Jos Buttler (captain), Moeen Ali, Gus Atkinson, Jonny Bairstow, Sam Curran, Liam Livingstone, Dawid Malan, Adil Rashid, Joe Root, Jason Roy, Ben Stokes, Reece Topley, David Willey, Mark Wood, Chris Woakes.

I mean, it’s incredibly similar to the squad of four years ago that won and won dramatically, which is mainly good. I mean, they absolutely won on a wing and a prayer, but the same team will have the same wings and prayers, so. I’m curious if S Curran will be in the starting XI. Probably - hopefully - and it seems to me that he’s the one projected to take on the Ben Stokes, batting-six-and-there-at-the-end role, and he doesn’t seem ready for that now so I guess the inclusion of Stokes is good. Just, you know, it’s better if everyone arrives in India with the Captain able to move.

I’m a bit surprised by the inclusion of Jason Roy. He hasn’t done much for a while. I guess I’m pleased in the sense that I like loyalty to players, but I was expecting Jacks, Crawley and Foakes and they have all contributed more to recent matches (although admittedly in different formats). But I’m also pleased because I have loyalty to players and if J-Roy can find some form with Jonny, England will stand in incredible stead.

Leaving out Harry Brook though.

Chuffed for David Willey.

England squad for T20 series against New Zealand: Jos Buttler (captain), Rehan Ahmed, Moeen Ali, Gus Atkinson, Jonny Bairstow, Harry Brook, Sam Curran, Ben Duckett, Will Jacks, Liam Livingstone, Dawid Malan, Adil Rashid, Josh Tongue, John Turner, Luke Wood.

Yay, Will Jacks! I think he might be the crucial test player of the future so it’s nice to see him beginning to be included. Also great to see more Rehan Ahmed.

I wondered about Crawley, but the red ball and white ball teams seem to be pulling away from each other to some degree, so I’m not that surprised.

No Dan Lawrence in either format, which is a shame.

I don’t recall Gus Atkinson when Surrey have played Middlesex but I guess he must be something. Surrey are certainly an extremely strong side - the white ball team isn’t a million miles from a Surrey 1st XI. Which brings me to…

Seriously. Has Foakes set fire to a pavilion? Murdered a groundskeeper? Chained himself to The Oval and refused to leave?

#cricket #ODI World Cup 2023 #ODI v NZ 2023 #T20 v NZ 2023 #selection #Ben Stokes #Sam Curran #Harry Brook #Jason Roy #David Willey #Will Jacks #Rehan Ahmed #Zac Crawley #Dan Lawrence #Gus Atkinson #Ben Foakes #WHY HAVE THEY FORSAKEN FOAKES

3 notes · View notes