#HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO ASSESS RELATIVE POWER DIFFERENCES UNDER THESE CONDITIONS

[gumy-shark]

girl who loves analyzing fighting styles and characters power levels vs mob psycho 100, an anime which doesn’t focus on the mechanics of its power system at all

[3ezentrum3-blog]

Even High-tech Treatments Do Not Guarantee That Cancer Can Be Cured or Will Not Spread

At some point toward the beginning of August 2007, Swee (not genuine name, 71 years of age female from Indonesia) had hacks with blood recolored mucus. She counseled a general therapeutic professional who requested a X-beam to be done, suspecting that she may have tuberculosis. The X-beam demonstrated a tumor in her lung. She was hence alluded to a pro who completed a CT output and found "a 4.8 x 3.9 cm delicate tissue mass with lymphadenopathy of the correct lung." It was a 3A disease. A biopsy was prescribed however Swee declined and chose to come to Penang for a second assessment.

In Penang, a bronchial biopsy was done and the outcome affirmed the before conclusion. It was an "invading, ineffectively separated carcinoma." Swee was alluded to an oncologist for chemotherapy.

Multi day before Swee was booked for chemotherapy she got a telephone call from a relative advising her to go for treatment in China. This she managed decisively.

Swee was dealt with in a private healing center in China for twenty-eight days. She experienced the accompanying medicines:

1. Chemotherapy with Navelbine.

2. Cyroablation utilizing Argon-helium. Three cryoprobes were embedded into the sore and the entire solidifying process was checked with the CT examine until "iceball" totally secured the objective mass. After two solidifying defrost cycles the cryoprobes were hauled out.

3. Radioacative iodine seeds implantation. Under guided CT filter, 15 radioactive iodine-125 seeds were embedded into the tumor mass.

The specialists reasoned that these medicines were effective. Swee was permitted to return home to Indonesia.

In November 2007, Swee came back to China for her second round of treatment. This visit kept going fifteen days. She experienced similar medicines: chemotherapy with Navelbine, cryoablation and iodine seed implantation. As per the specialists, the second technique was effectively done and the patient's condition was better.

As per her child who went with her to China, the Chinese specialists proposed that Swee experience a sum of six medications. Her child stated: "The specialists guaranteed us that the tumor will leave however in the meantime cautioned that the disease can spread to different parts of the body. There is no certification that it won't spread. He said which part of the body it will spread to."

After Swee came back to her home, the individuals from her family were in a difficulty. They didn't have the assets to continue with assist medicines in China. The cost of her first treatment was 87,000 Yuan. The second treatment cost 57,000 Yuan. Swee needed to offer the house the family is remaining in to back her treatment. Her five youngsters (two children and three little girls) were uncertain if this was the right activity. This is on account of there is no conviction that Swee will be totally relieved.

Swee's child came to see us in December 2007 and needed to know the accompanying:

1. What would it be advisable for them to do?

2. Regardless of whether it is conceivable to take our herbs and in the meantime experience the Chinese treatment, should they choose to go to China once more. This is with the expectation that herbs can help Swee in some ways where medicinal treatment can't.

I told the child that the primary point to take in genuine thought is the likelihood of the tumor spreading to the mind. It's not possible for anyone to stop that and the likelihood of this metastasis is high. To this the child stated: "Yes. While I was in the doctor's facility in China I have seen a few patients who endured like my mom and who experienced comparable medicines. Around a half year after the treatment the disease spread to the mind. The specialist additionally revealed to me that the kind of growth my mom has is exceptionally forceful and there is a 90% possibility that it will spread to different parts of the body. There is no certification that it won't spread."

Remarks

It is hard for me to exhort for this situation, but to state that from my perusing of restorative writing, lung tumor is deadly and the shot of a fix is nil. In any case, how might I advance this message in a way that isn't awful to patients as well as their relatives?

Alexander Spira and David Ettinger (Multidisciplinary administration of lung malignancy. New England J. of Med. 350:379-392) stated: "In spite of long periods of research, the anticipation for patients with lung growth stays troubling."

As per Stephen Spiro and Joanna Porter (Lung disease - where are we today? Amer. J. Respiratory and Critical Care Med. 166:1166-1196): "In spite of the fact that chemotherapy might be a sensible approach, there is for all intents and purposes no confirmation that it can fix NSCLC. The fiscal cost ... is high. The other cost of chemotherapy is its danger and its potential inconvenience to personal satisfaction. Disillusioning as it might sound, this totals up the truth."

Regardless of whether what I say (lung growth has no fix) might be valid, by and large patients would not take it compassionate or would not trust me. They need a fix and they expect a fix with the treatment offered to them. In the event that we offer herbs and train them to change their way of life in the desire for drawing out their lives or advancing the nature of their lives, regardless they demand that we let them know of the odds of fix.

This email to me is one great case to delineate my point. "The patients put add up to trust in specialists to endorse the best treatment strategies i.e., put their lives in the hands of the restorative specialists. Those enormous pharmaceutical organizations ... end up being very persuading in their logical clarification until today. That is the reason a considerable measure of patients still lean toward their medications. In actuality, home grown treatment offers no clarification in the matter of how the herbs function and to what degree it can encourage the patients. As such, there is no certification that taking herbs will improve you feel either. Correspondingly, on the off chance that I am to ask you by and by, how and to what degree your herbs can enable the patient, I to don't figure I can expect a solid answer. Once more, you may state it is up to the individual to choose and put his/her confidence in whatever choice being made. It resembles advising the patient to pick whatever he/she supposes is the correct medication. I don't think this is correct. On the off chance that I know out and out that something works - whether they be herbs or medications, I would not be terrified to confer myself and promoter the way that it will work.

There are questions patients may ask while considering your herbs as an elective treatment, for example, would you be able to certainly say that your herbs work much successfully than current medications?"

I completely comprehend that patients need a certification or a guarantee of fix. However, our experience discloses to us that there is no solution for growth, be it be a beginning time or a terminal stage. To tell patients generally, sums to conning by deceiving or misleading them. To us, recuperating (take note of the utilization of the word mending not fix) of tumor isn't tied in with taking herbs alone. Most patients overlooked the main issue that they should first figure out how to help themselves by changing their way of life, eating regimen and mentality in the event that they need to discover recuperating. Tragically, this change is something difficult for patients to do. For this situation, her child disclosed to us that Swee isn't a man who will change. She isn't set up to change her eating regimen and has faith in eating anything she prefers. The contention is: "the reason must I not have the capacity to eat anything I like - I am will bite the dust at any rate." It didn't jump out at Swee that it could be the undesirable way of life and eating routine that prompted the demise of her significant other (entanglements of hypertension, diabetes, and so forth.) moreover her sister kicked the bucket of colon disease, sibling of stomach growth and close relative of nasopharyngeal malignancy (NPC).

Furthermore, the herbs are not going to taste great and the child isn't confident that Swee would even need to drink it. To put it plainly, most patients like Swee is just intrigued to discover mending without anyone else terms. They look for that slippery enchantment projectile to make them well.

Drs. Richard Deyo and Donald Patrick, educators at the University of Washington, Seattle, USA, in their book, Hope or Hype: the fixation on average advances and the surprising expense of false guarantees, composed:

1. We are conceived "with our own particular visually impaired trust in a therapeutic foundation that preys on our most profound feelings of trepidation, at the same time indicating to ride to our save with "supernatural occurrences fixes."

2. "The blend of industry voracity, media publicity, political convenience and our own "techno-utilization" mentality is driving increasingly regularly to a dependence on expensive medications that are barely powerful, best case scenario - and now and again out and out hazardous."

3. "At the point when decisions include new medicines, the suspicion is quite often that increasingly and more up to date must be better. Advantageously, this position quite often matches with monetary self-intrigue."

4. "It is said that specialists are ever excessively eager, making it impossible to recommend the most recent medication without investigating the confirmation at all it makes them glad, it fulfills the patients and it makes the medication rep upbeat."

We don't trust that there is such a mind-bending concept as an enchantment slug for malignancy. We are not consistent with our motivation and sell out our central goal on the off chance that we say or go about as though we have one. It is hard for some to comprehend that we are here attempting to help. We want to push our herbs. We set no business target and don't mean to vanquish new markets. Our work is driven by affection and empathy, not benefit. If at any time there is any affirmation or certification patients get from us, it is this: "Attempt the herbs for maybe a couple weeks. In the event that the patient doesn't getter any better, quit taking our herbs and discover another person for help."

Give me a chance to close with this story. Lung growth was already treated with Iressa. At the point when Iressa was first propelled it was hailed in the media as: The Drug of Tomorrow; The Miracle Drug; The Smart Drug; Miracle Cure - the medication that Rises from the Ashes and different superlatives.

The message to the world was clear: "A leap forward is close by - there is extraordinary expectation and incredible expectation. Lung malignancy patients require not kick the bucket any more. A supernatural occurrence sedate is finally here." The US-Food and Drug Administration support

[ieatyourhatelikelovezine-blog]

Thinness is not a rent you pay to exist

Every Wednesday I have a therapy session at the ED clinic I attend weekly. I am an outpatient now, so this means largely going recovery alone. I am lucky that, despite a very tricky gap from inpatients to outpatients care, I ended up with a fantastic therapist. The thing is therapy like Cognitive Behavioural Therapy is tricky because it’s based on the assumption that thought processes are faulty and thus need to be altered in order to perceive reality correctly. To its credit, mostly CB therapists don’t believe that everything is wonderful and you’re too ‘ill’ to see it, rather that some things can be average or even bad but your perception of them might make these things intolerable or that you only see the worst in situations where there can be good. This is extremely useful, especially in EDs where we tend to put an inordinate amount of thought on our weight, shape or appearance and CBT can help us shift our focus to other places.

There is a problem, though. I remember very clearly during treatment that a healthcare professional told me that it’s not out of the ordinary for a woman to be concerned about eating out at a restaurant for fear of gaining weight. Now it wasn’t like I hadn’t been fully aware of the absolute metric fuck-tonne of body-hating bile spilled by corporations and mass media designed to make you want to despise every inch of yourself enough to spend as much as you can on their products or services (think gyms, think plastic surgery, think beauty products). But perhaps through an eating disorder, it truly dawned on me that the problems it created were so endemic that it was hard to prise apart the experiences of someone with a diagnosis of an eating disorder and someone without. I have relatives who go to the gym obsessively, who talk to me about food nearly the whole time we are together and who would never even consider their behaviour disordered or problematic, no matter how much psychological stress they are clearly under from the amount of time needed to take out of their day for this, never mind being constantly hungry. As I began to look around, once I was confronted with the supposed ‘abnormality’ of my behaviour in my diagnosis, I saw disordered eating in many people that I knew in many different forms. In fact, I had had severely disordered eating up to 2 years before my treatment began but hardly anybody noticed because I hardly stood out, I mean why would I? Everyone else was doing it.

I am not the first person who has been enthusiastically congratulated, repeatedly might I add, on what was a very unhealthy body size. People I didn’t even know would gush at the sight of my body. (I like to really refrain from making any references to my size to prevent reinforcing stereotypes about the ‘typical’ person with an ED, but in this context it’s necessary.) However, as I have been overweight in my life as well, I am very familiar with the disgusting fatphobia that accompanies having a larger body. I used to get asked if I was pregnant, given unwanted tips on weight loss, get shouted at in the street and spoken to badly by customers at work as well as facing systemic oppression such as unhelpful treatment by doctors and very rude healthcare staff.

So we can see from the above that according to western beauty standards, it’s simple: thin is good, fat is bad.

So my question then, and unfortunately my unresolved question now, is how do I go about recovery in a world that doesn’t want me to recover? How do I go about recovery when it is accepted that feeling hatred towards your body is very widely accepted? And yes, whilst men do get eating disorders, it’s important to recognise that many of these are members of the LGBTQ community, and despite their underrepresentation, women of colour not only get EDs at high rates but they often aren’t diagnosed or treated appropriately. These are people who are told that their bodies don’t fit with white western beauty standards. If you are told that your body doesn’t belong, doesn’t fit, needs to be changed then yes, people may respond with disordered eating and at what point do we consider this an absurd response? Is it at all? I don’t think so. Now this isn’t to say that eating disorders are the correct and only response and in no way is this an attempt to trivialise the serious issues of people whose eating behaviours are particularly damaging to their wellbeing. However, I am attempting to illustrate the extent to which problematic eating behaviours manifest themselves more widely than just simply in the minds of those diagnosed with an eating disorder.

Don’t get me wrong, the body positivity movement can be of great help, but often it is still focused on ‘beauty’ or what is ‘beautiful’. It is still very body focused.

So yeah, I can say go seek out some body positivity and maybe you should, but it seems like such an individualistic response. Fuck blaming a phantom, omnipotent “media”, the “media” isn’t politically influenced by itself, it’s politically influenced by capital. Money. Capital that needs YOUR capital to thrive. Capital that needs you to feel bad about yourself, enough to spend money, enough not to feel like you’re worth anything more than a shit job in terrible conditions, a terribly maintained rented accommodation, £28,000+ tuition fees. Capital that needs you to dislike yourself, your body, your power and everything that it represents.

So how in good faith can I commit to recovery by changing my thought process surrounding this? Because I’m right aren’t I? The evidence is there. This doesn’t mean I’ll stop trying, it means I’ll assess the ways in which to do so, and I think that means tearing down the very institutions that make people feel like I do, and maybe like you do.