#Grizzly bears
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
amanitahouses · 2 days ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Salmon hats: sweeping the nation by storm watercolor on paper, digitally overlaid on photo
23 notes · View notes
briochedbrick · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
bearz...all of the bears.. (yes this is my first post hello..)
7K notes · View notes
fridaybear · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
×,.·´¨'°÷·.. Happy Friday the 13th! ..·´¨'°÷·..× BEHOLD YOUR 2023 FAT BEAR QUEEN!
128 Grazer took the top spot, and we couldn't be more proud. All hail Grazer! Thanks for hanging with us. We appreciate you. Make your weekend amazing. 🤎 🐻 🤎
2K notes · View notes
whereifindsanity · 7 months ago
Text
instagram.com
Tin Man Lee
550 notes · View notes
antiqueanimals · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Michael Coleman (b. 1946), Grizzlies (1983), gouache on paper, 15 × 24.5 inches.
Coeur d’Alene Art Auction
736 notes · View notes
cpahlow · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
154 notes · View notes
sumbluespruce · 2 months ago
Text
Filler up! Winter is at hand.
10/24
68 notes · View notes
rjzimmerman · 8 months ago
Text
Frontier myth vilified the California grizzly. Science tells a new story. (Washington Post)
Tumblr media
The grizzly, a subspecies of brown bear, has long held a place in mainstream American myth as a dangerous, even bloodthirsty creature. Its scientific name, Ursus arctos horribilis, means “the horrible bear.” But that image is being challenged by a new set of studies that combine modern biochemical analysis, historical research and Indigenous knowledge to bring the story of the California grizzly from fiction to fact.
In January, a team of experts led by University of California at Santa Barbara ecologist Alexis Mychajliw published a paper in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B about the diet of the California grizzly bear and how that influenced its extinction. The results challenge virtually every aspect of the bear’s established story.
“Pretty much everything that I thought I knew about these animals turned out to be wrong,” said Peter Alagona, an ecologist and historian at UCSB and co-author of the study.
Much of the grizzly bear’s long-standing narrative comes from stories, artwork and early photographs depicting California grizzlies as huge in size and aggressive in nature. Many of these reports, which found wide readership in newspapers elsewhere in the West and in the cities back East, were written by what Alagona calls the Californian influencers of their time.
“They were trying to get rich and famous by marketing themselves as these icons of the fading frontier,” Alagona said. “A lot of the historical sources that we have about grizzlies are actually not about grizzlies. They’re about this weird Victorian 19th-century celebrity culture.”
The team of ecologists, historians and archivists compared the image of California grizzlies from these frontier reports to harder data in the form of bear bones from museum collections all over the state.
The frontier myth had painted the California bears as larger than grizzlies elsewhere in the country, but the bone analysis revealed that they were the same size and weight, about 6 feet long and 440 pounds for the average adult.
In an even larger blow to the popular story of the vicious grizzly, the bones showed that before 1542, when the first Europeans arrived, the bears were only getting about 10 percent of their diet from preying on land animals. They were primarily herbivores, surviving on a varied diet of acorns, roots, berries, fish and occasionally larger prey such as deer.
As European-style farming and ranching began to dominate the landscape, grizzlies became more like the stories those frontier influencers were telling about them. The percentage of meat in their diet rose to about 25 percent, probably in large part because of the relative ease of catching a fenced-in cow or sheep compared to a wild elk.
Colonialism forced so many changes on the California landscape so quickly, affecting every species that the bears ate and interacted with, that the exact cause of this change will be difficult to ever fully understand.
Still, grizzlies were never as vicious or purely predatory as the stories made them out to be. The narrative of the huge killer bear instead fed a larger settler story of a landscape — and a people — that could not coexist with the settlers themselves. And that story became a disaster for more than just bears.
Although we will never have exact numbers, experts agree that hundreds of thousands of Indigenous people were living in what is now California before White settlers arrived. One frequently cited estimate puts the population at 340,000.
By 1900, that number had been slashed by more than 95 percent to around 16,000 surviving tribal members throughout the state. Eliminating the bear and the vast majority of California’s Indigenous people can be seen as parts of the same concerted effort to replace one landscape — and one set of stories — with another.
“The annihilation of the California grizzly bear was part of a much larger campaign of annihilation,” Alagona said. “I think it’s clear that what happened in California meets the legal definition of a genocide. But in a way, it was even more than that, because these were not just attempts to eliminate groups of people. These were attempts to destroy an entire world.”
186 notes · View notes
arewebeholdingaman · 6 months ago
Note
bears but specifically when they stand on two legs
Tumblr media
✅️ featherless
✅️ biped
Bears but specifically when they stand on two legs is a Man!
141 notes · View notes
grizzly-bear-official · 11 months ago
Note
What's the difference between and ABC brownbear and a Grizzly?
hi, thanks for asking!
grizzly bears are a subspecies of brown bears! kodiak bears and european brown bears are also subspecies. "brown bear" is a broader category that includes several subspecies. geographical separation and location is the largest factor in determining the differences between subspecies of brown bear.
grizzly bears are one of the largest subspecies of brown bear (kodiak bears are the largest)! they live in north america and don't typically have access to as many coastal food sources as kodiak bears do, which means that they're usually smaller in size. while kodiak bears are coastal and have access to fatty salmon, grizzly bears live inland and rely more heavily on plant life and insects that they forage.
Tumblr media
above is a diagram that illustrates the size difference. from left to right - black bear, grizzly bear, kodiak bear, and polar bear.
grizzlies live in alpine meadows, forests, and valleys. their fur has a 'grizzled' appearance - with darker roots and lighter tips - hence their name.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
142 notes · View notes
foldingfittedsheets · 8 months ago
Text
*No audio necessary it’s just kids babbling while the bears flail at each other
Mothers Day at the zoo today and the bears were very rowdy!
I was scoping the spot cause if we get married at the zoo we can set up by the bears and otters. It looked perfect, I need to follow up on that.
94 notes · View notes
lucy-moderatz · 13 days ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
27 notes · View notes
sitting-on-me-bum · 8 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Spirit Bears and Grizzly Bears at home in the Great Bear Rainforest, British Columbia, Canada
Photographer: Nick Garbutt
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
69 notes · View notes
fridaybear · 1 year ago
Text
FAT BEAR WEEK BEGINS TOMORROW!!!
865 notes · View notes
whereifindsanity · 21 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
Stian Norum Herlofsen
96 notes · View notes
antiqueanimals · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Montana Outdoors. July/August 1975, Vol. 6, No. 4. Watercolor by A.J. McCoy.
Internet Archive
524 notes · View notes