#Get Anonymous AI

[gojoest]

one last thing, non freaks unfollow me this instant block me for better

[neunhofferart]

Regarding the DarkJurassic feature the thing that was up today, someone said the images were AI... I know its supposed to be a conspiracy website full of cuckoo's but please say they got an actual human artist or artists to create it? 🙏🙏😭😭

I'm pretty sure our human design team made all of those-- they were hanging up around the office for years lol. The intent was definitely to make them look like the sort of quick photoshop clickbait thumbnails and advertisements you see on real shady websites on purpose. And the reason there is no legible text is because we had no budget to write copy (you have to pay someone to write all the writing that appears on screen and that's why it usually shows up as gibberish in JWCC and JWCT unless it's REALLY important). I think those images were intended to be possible webpage designs that could have appeared in the actual show in like... the background of a shot or something.

[carriesthewind]

the "painting" with the orange tree by "juan" is AI.

Hi, do you have any actual evidence of that? I looked at the original post, and it looks like op just added "ai art" tags because someone told them it was ai art, again, without evidence. I looked up the artist, and while he is openly a digital artist and I get a lot of hits of people doing so-called "ai art" in his style (or links to pages in which his art is talked about and then halfway down the page there is an article about ai art), I don't see direct evidence that he is using so-called ai? (Although most of the direct some I can find by him is in Spanish, which I do not read, which makes it more difficult to research.)

I will remove the post (and be kinda pissed) if it is made by a plagiarism machine, but some random anonymous person declaring that to be so is not enough for me. One of the really messed-up results of the use of so-called ai is that people feel empowered to call tons of genuine artwork (often digital artworks) "ai art" based nothing except vibes or repeating a rumor.

And again, to be clear, I am more than willing to accept actual evidence that it is ai generated. But I need more than an anonymous person's say-so.

[son1c]

It’s so big brained of you to come up with a reason why some of eggmans bots went rogue while the others didn’t it’s just *chefs kiss* world building my beloved

i <3 inferences

[frostbitedoesart]

Just making a general post real quick in response to an ask.

When I say I'm anti-ai I mean I'm against any sort of AI that steals from others or would otherwise be used to put people out of a job. I don't feel like having an elaborate conversation about the positives and negatives of AI and all that, so I'll state this as plainly as possible.

I don't like AI art. I don't like AI voice impersonations. I don't like any sort of AI that has to steal stuff from people without their consent in order to function. That is literally it.

I'm not against ALL AI. I don't think people that are okay with AI in general should be burned at the stake or something. I'm just an artist and writer that doesn't like AI being used in CREATIVE SPACES. That's it.

I didn't think I would have to clarify this but, here you go, for anyone that was bothered.

[mumblesplash]

I disagree, one time I asked AI to draw Judas' hands and it made the stack of coins in his hands cast a shadow in the middle of his palm that looked like the stigmata. I did have to feed it the idea of there being silver coins and "red liquid,/ and a rope necklace" but by selecting what I wanted it to be drawing from (pictures and statues of saints, therefore basically entirely public domain) and having a keen eye for what I was looking for (photography, after all, is 90% selection), I got a lot of intent in there! Haven't really done anything with it since, because I don't have any other projects that would avoid the sourcing issue that well/working around the fact that the sites demand you ask for squeaky clean prompts is annoying.

this is a good point and not a type of ai program use i was addressing in the original post, but fwiw i don’t think we actually disagree

like, a camera is also a tool that allows people to generate images that prior to its invention could only be produced through sometimes-inaccessible levels of skill and practice, but it’s still possible to take bad pictures. you get out what you put in. you got a lot of intent in your generated picture because you HAD a lot of intent, and the skills necessary to effectively use the tool

the thing is, the actual, stated goal of a lot of ���ai artists’ is to make artistic skill itself obsolete/less valuable, for some godforsaken reason. and they’re trying to accomplish this by feeding examples of the result of that skill into a machine until it can replicate everything they understand about it without learning anything themselves.

what i’m saying, and i think your example here supports this if anything, is any image produced with that primary motivation is going to fail in its purpose because even aside from any ethical/intellectual property issues, it’s self-defeating. cameras didn’t make art obsolete, they just gave us a new way to make art.

and it also feels relevant to note that to this day one of the best compliments a photograph can receive is “it looks just like a painting”

[davrinassan]

Aren't these cat gifs ai generated?

are they...... i just typed in halloween cat on tenor.................

there is no way to have fun on the internet anymore everything is corrupted. everything has decayed and rotted and im going to walk off the earth goodbye

[controversial-blorbo-bracket]

will you bring a few things to support and allow me to do the things I want to do with the cheese wiz

As long as vriska is there and you threaten to kill me first

[thetimecrystal]

favourite new song you've listened to recently?

curious anons?

this song is not net, but new to me, and it slaps so hard

[universalsatan]

Hey bestie, no need to answer this, but I saw u reblogged something from roach - works, and I just wanna let u know that she's a major terf

oh!!! thank you for this fr. i'm answering this bc i just wanna say that i don't have shinigami eyes and i'm on mobile most of the time, so these pointers are much appreciated <33

[booasaur]

Looks like Laysla is just being extra careful about strike rules. She recently posted herself dancing and lip syncing to Taylor Swift’s Shake it Off and winked when “cruising” came up.

I had to go back to this older ask in reply to one I'd already answered to say you were truly vindicated, anon. :P Since Thursday she's been sharing TONS of vids, her own BTS as well as the various Cruz/Aaliyah fanart people have been posting, she was really just waiting to be unleashed.

[francy-sketches]

why are you being such an asshole to one of the kindest most clever most staying in their lane never mean to anyone account of this fandom who woops also yet again is a queer fan of color funny how that keeps happening

[nalivaa]

if it helps, ai is literally incapable of generating a good story. even if you feed it the exact prompt u want: it doesnt understand the characters. it doesnt get their dynamics. it knows nothing of the source material. it can write a story, arguably, sure, but its a story of cardboard cutouts wearing misaligned stickers of the characters moving across a stage made of cereal boxes

imagine the worst fic youve ever read and just subtract the grammar/ortography errors from it

if that doesnt utterely destroy the temptation, i dont know what would

that's very true and definitely one of the reasons for why i'm never gonna use chatgtp! nothing can replace an author that actually knows the characters and cares for the story.

plus i enjoy the process of creation far too much to actually want a machine to make it for me. what's the point of making something if you put a piece of yourself into it.

[cherpbooboo]

yall support ai bots ?? 💀

Man it’s 1am I’m not doing this with y’all 🫡

[perelka-l]

Do you think draytons a top or a bottom?

I like to think Drayton is pretty versatile, so I can only see him as switch. That being said, I like to think he has two situations that I could see him enjoying himself the most:

First one is that absolutely strikes me as the most unsufferable pillow princess in the world. He just wants to lie there and take it and be taken care of. Maybe he's a lazyass, maybe he just enjoys being at mercy of someone else, maybe all of that and more. I can imagine some people could be into the idea of getting to do whatever they want to that insufferable moron but Drayton honestly wouldn't mind.

Second one is a complete oppositte, relying on Drayton's more draconic instincts. It's following both hc relating to dragon trainers and really, Drayton's more controlly behaviors, but I can see him dominating the shit out of the other party, biting absolutely a must, staking a claim even. He could get a bit violent like this, going from passive observer to giving himself way to actually control someone else. I can imagine he'd get off to that feeling of being in power.

Thus: switch :D I'd thought considering I heavily hc as a bicycle, I think he enjoys plenty of things anyway.

[mean-scarlet-deceiver]

what is your opinion on the episode

wharf & peace.

Hmm, I really only discuss Seasons 1-7.

I did go ahead and watch this one and I have to say it only confirms the wisdom of my original boundaries, mwaha. I can't get invested either way.

Mood, Skarloey. Big mood.