#Fire risk Assessor
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Fire risk Assessor And Fire Risk Assessment
Fire risk Assessor And Fire Risk Assessment
The fire risk assessor is expected to be a competent person and the fire risk assessor has a duty of care to the Responsible Person of the premises on which the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 imposes a requirement for the written fire risk assessment.
The ultimate responsibility for the adequacy of the fire risk assessment rests with the Responsible Person of the premises rather than with the fire risk assessor. This is why it is important that a competent fire risk assessor is appointed to carry out your fire risk assessments. It is therefore recommended that you use a certificated third-party provider of which CSAR Fire Ltd is a BAFE SP205 accredited company.
BAFE manages and maintains the BAFE SP205 scheme, which addresses life safety fire risk assessment. This scheme provides high-quality, independent evidence that providers are qualified to provide fire risk assessment services. As stated earlier, the ultimate responsibility for the adequacy of the fire risk assessment rests with the Responsible Person of the premises therefore, to be deemed to have carried out their due diligence to contract a competent person to carry out their fire risk assessments, the use of a BAFE SP205 company would support this.
We are added to the BAFE Fire Safety Register online, which will enable all users searching for Third Party Certificated BAFE Registered Companies for Fire Risk Assessment services to access our information. This can be carried out by https://bafe.my.salesforcesites.com/wb/wbCompanyVerification and searching by our Scheme Registration Certificate Number which is 302783.
Employers and other persons who have control of premises are required by legislation to carry out an assessment of the fire risks to occupants of buildings, and to other people in the vicinity of the buildings. This is to ensure that these people are safe from fire and its effects. For the purposes of completing the written fire risk assessment we use the PAS 79 format which is the industry standard, and the standard required by the BAFE SP205 registration.
The fire risk assessment needs to take into account the fire risk assessor`s opinion of the likelihood of various fire scenarios, the extent of injury that could occur to occupants in these scenarios, and the number of people that could be affected. The assessment is principally based on the fire risk assessor`s findings which will be discussed with the responsible person at the time of the assessment. The assessment will include an action plan for the responsible person of any shortcomings that needs to be addressed and a timescale indication of when the items need to be put into place.
Upon the completion of your fire risk assessment we will issue an approved Certificate of Conformity that CSAR Fire Ltd has applied the standards required by BAFE SP205 in undertaking your fire risk assessment. This certificate can be printed and displayed within your premises as a clear statement that you have had a fire risk assessment carried out by a competent life safety fire risk assessor and a registered BAFE SP205 company.
0 notes
Text
Fire Risk Assessment
We conduct Fire Risk Assessments within Licensed Premises, Offices, Warehouses, Factories, Residential Properties, Care Homes, Retail Outlets, Hospitals and all buildings which require them under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 which includes the common areas of flats.
0 notes
Text
Our comprehensive fire safety assessments are required for fire safety regulations compliance and are conducted using the PAS 79 format. Improve your building's safety and feel confident that you are meeting your legal obligations while keeping your employees and visitors as safe as possible. We are a BAFE SP205 accredited company therefore the responsible person will be deemed to have carried out their due diligence to contract a competent person to carry out their fire risk assessments.
1 note
·
View note
Text
Dispatches documentary reveals shocking state of Duchy of Cornwall properties
ByNick SommerladInvestigations Editor
16:00, 2 Nov 2024
Scores of rental properties owned by Prince William fail to meet the minimum legal energy efficiency standards for landlords, we can reveal.
We found some of his tenants are at risk of fuel poverty, living in hard to heat homes that are riddled with damp and black mould. Our investigation with Channel 4 Dispatches has found that as many as one in seven of William’s inherited Duchy of Cornwall’s residential rental properties have the lowest Energy Performance Certificate ratings of F or G.
It comes as the taxpayer is funding a £369m renovation of Buckingham Palace and Prince William launches his campaign against homelessness and for “everyone having a right to a safe and stable home”. One tenant said: “The slick PR will stick in the throat of many tenants. He should start by bringing the homes he already owns up to modern standards.”
Claire Williams meeting William's father, King Charles
Tenant Claire Williams was evicted last week over rent arrears ( Image: MIKE ALSFORD/MWP)
The Duchy has more than 600 rental properties and over a 15-month investigation we identified nearly 500 of them. We found 50 Duchy properties rated F and 20 rated G, including six properties with the lowest EPC score of one point out of 100.
We spoke to a number of tenants on condition of anonymity who are living in cold, poorly insulated homes, often without central heating and many relying on the most expensive solid fuels for heat. It has been illegal since 2020 for landlords to rent out properties that are rated below an E under the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards regulations without a valid exemption.
Since the new rules, Prince William and the previous Duke of Cornwall King Charles III have between them received £91m in profits from the Duchy. One tenant with no central heating spends hundreds of pounds a month on coal and wood to heat just two rooms in his house.
He told us: “It gets miserably cold especially in the winter, you can see through the roof. I can only heat two rooms in my home using a wood burner and a coal fire, and the landlord told me that my rent was going to be put up considerably if they put in radiators."
Claire's home is filled with damp and mould ( Image: MIKE ALSFORD/MWP)
He claimed: "There is mould appearing on soft furnishings and clothes because the air is so cold and damp. To make my property efficient it needs to be insulated but they won't do that because of the cost. But you don't want to say anything against your landlord for fear of eviction. There could be consequences.”
Another elderly tenant with no central heating and just one fireplace for warmth was under a blanket when we visited his home in early September. A third told us: “The house is freezing. We were told that it is uninhabitable. When the wind blows the curtains start swinging. There’s no heating upstairs at all.
“I asked about double glazing and they said Prince Charles doesn’t like it. Well he doesn’t have to live here.” A fourth said: “The house is cold and it is a struggle but there is nowhere else to live here. They are not good landlords.”
One Duchy tenant who let us take photos of her home is Claire Williams, 53, who was evicted last week over rent arrears – which she disputes. She says she wasn’t told when an energy assessor found her former farmhouse outside Exeter was rated F in 2015. But she says she has struggled with cold and damp since she moved in more than 20 years ago.
Parts of the house which are below the ground level feel wet to the touch and are covered in black mould that Claire says she has never been able to stop growing back. She said: “As much as I tried to cover it up with mould sealer it just comes back.
Some tenants have spoken of their poor living conditions ( Image: MIKE ALSFORD/MWP)
Prince William and King Charles at the Army Aviation Centre in Stockbridge, Hampshire, in May ( Image: Getty Images)
“Any wallpapering or any painting I do, after a couple of months it just peels off. I've complained about it for 21 years. The repaint was done about a week before I moved in so you couldn't see it.”
Claire says the house has become increasingly expensive to heat: “I have to heat the house where all the heat is going out windows. I have to pay an awful lot for oil. It is just so expensive when you know you are paying all this money into a property and it's heating outside.”
She used to pay £430 to fill her 3,000 litre oil tank, but it now costs £600 for just 500 litres that last only three months. "I can never afford to fill my tank," Claire added. She said she only found out about the poor EPC rating when she was asked to leave: “When I got my eviction letter, I phoned Citizens Advice.
“They checked it out on the internet and said 'It's an F, you shouldn't be living there. You shouldn't be paying to live there and it's illegal to let that property out'. I think the Duchy are saying that I've lived here too long. You can live in conditions that are dreadful because I have lived here too long.
“They don't seem to have any consideration for the people that have lived in their houses for a length of time. They try to save money on people's lives to gain money for themselves." After the Duchy began eviction proceedings against Claire, inspectors from Mid-Devon Council visited her home and served the Duchy of Cornwall with a "hazards awareness notice" over the conditions. They found "damp and mould growth" and "excess cold" throughout the property.
The conditions inside another Duchy of Cornwall property
The Duchy of Cornwall would not comment on Claire’s EPC but said it was a “responsible and compassionate Landlord” and only evicts tenants “in rare circumstances where all other alternatives have been exhausted”. A Duchy of Cornwall spokesperson said: “We are a responsible Landlord committed to continuous improvement of its properties. We work closely with our tenants to actively address energy efficiency of properties across our portfolio while minimising the impact on residents.
"The Duchy of Cornwall is a private estate with a commercial imperative which we achieve alongside our commitment to restoring the natural environment and generating positive social impact for our communities. Prince William became Duke of Cornwall in September 2022 and since then has committed to an expansive transformation of the Duchy.
“This includes a significant investment to make the estate net zero by the end of 2032, as well as establishing targeted mental health support for our tenants and working with local partners to help tackle homelessness in Cornwall.” We showed our dossier of evidence to EPC expert Andrew Parkin, director of Elmhurst Energy and chair of the trade body Property Energy Professionals Association, who said: “That does surprise me.
“I would kind of expect to see a very small landlord here as somebody who doesn’t really understand the regulations. Every landlord has a responsibility for the buildings that they own and the tenants that are in those buildings.
“The vast majority of people agree that we have to improve our building stock, not just for the people who live in those buildings, but also for the planet and for reducing our impact on the planet.” He examined a handful of EPCs from the Duchy’s rentals and said about one: “Well, this is the worst performing kind of property. It is more likely to be a cold, draughty, hard to heat property. It certainly will be expensive to heat the property … the rating is is very, very low indeed.
Some of William's tenants are at risk of fuel poverty
About another, he said: “It has also got solid fuel heating and solid fuel room heaters, which is a very inefficient and very expensive way of heating a property. A lot of carbon emitted almost twice the amount on that one was twice the amount of the typical house.
“Because they're using something expensive like wood and electricity, the fuel bills are very, very high indeed. In terms of carbon emissions, this is a very polluting property.” Shown photos of one property, he said: “Wherever you've got large gaps and cracks within the structure of the building, you're going to get draughts … I would expect that property to be pretty cold to live in.”
He added: “With these EPCs that I've seen today, it's quite clear to me that they shouldn't be rented out until they comply with either the minimum energy efficiency standards or they have a valid exemption on the exemptions register.” None of the 70 properties with F and G ratings had exemptions in place but we understand the Duchy considers that the rules do not apply to properties where the same tenant has lived there for many years and the EPC was done “voluntarily”.
Breaches of the MEES regulations can be penalised with fines of up to £5,000 per property. Our investigation with Channel 4’s Dispatches raises serious questions over the environmental record of the Duchy, which is owned by the heir to the throne.
The Duchy of Cornwall website states that the “Dukes of Cornwall have traditionally managed their own estates … Over the last few years, HRH Prince William, the current Prince of Wales, has worked with his father managing the estate and has now taken over full responsibility for the estate leadership.”
King Charles III, who owned the Duchy until September 2022, is a longstanding champion of environmental issues, while Prince William launched the Earthshot Prize in 2020 "to search for and scale the most innovative solutions to the world ’s greatest environmental challenges". Since the new rules came into force on EPC, Charles and William have between them received £91m in profits from the Duchy.
Claire's home in Devon ( Image: MIKE ALSFORD/MWP)
There are a series of “exemptions” from the MEES regulations available to landlords. Our research shows the Duchy has applied just 10 times for exemptions and the most common reason, used four times, was that the work would cost more than £3,500 to complete.
Campaigner Jonathan Bean, a spokesperson for Fuel Poverty Action, said: "It's a disgrace that a billion pound royal estate appears to be acting like a rogue landlord. And getting away with it. King Charles and Prince William have profited from renting out property that fails to meet even basic standards.
“These low standards cause misery by making heating unaffordable, leading to major health risks from cold and mould. F and G rated homes can cost three times more to heat, which is unaffordable for those on lower incomes.
"Renters are scared to complain about grim conditions, for fear of being evicted or subjected to rent increases. People are forced to suffer in silence. This royal mess demonstrates the fundamental power imbalance at the heart of this country’s broken housing system. Tenants may have rights in law, but in reality they are at the mercy of their landlords.
"We hope this investigation will spark the urgent action needed by Government to force the Duchy and other landlords to actually meet basic standards, and end the misery of people stuck in cold, damp and mouldy rental homes." Definitions of fuel poverty vary. One measure is a household that spends more then 10% of its income on heating - another refers to poorer household with an EPC rating below D.
In 2020, the year the rules on not renting properties below an E came into force, the Government found that 4.4% of rental properties were “non-compliant”. The latest from the Office of National Statistics found that just over 1.5% of rental properties are an F or a G but these include those with an exemption in place. In comparison, 14% of the Duchy rentals we found were rated F or G - nearly ten times higher.
Are you living in an inadequate royal property? Email [email protected].
The King, the Prince & Their Secret Millions: Dispatches’ on Channel 4, 8.10pm and afterwards on channel4.com.
45 notes
·
View notes
Text
David Cameron has provoked a wave of indignation from Grenfell fire survivors and housing campaigners after claiming that the inquiry agreed with him that fire regulations had not been part of his government’s “red tape drive” to cut regulations.
But campaigners said the former prime minister’s words were “bollocks” and “total bullshit”, since the inquiry report had explicitly said the effect of the Coalition government’s attack on red tape was that “even matters affecting the safety of life were ignored, delayed or disregarded”.
Ed Daffarn, 62, a Grenfell tower resident who raised multiple concerns about fire safety before the fire, said he was “angry but not surprised”, and said Cameron was “failing to take responsibility”.
After Cameron’s government came to power in 2010, it created a “one in, one out” rule where new regulations could only come into force if another was scrapped, later becoming one in, two out and one in, three out.
Survivors of the Grenfell tower fire in June 2017 believe that the lack of regulations and ministers’ failure to act on a coroner’s report into a fire at Lakanal House, another London tower block, eight years earlier had contributed to the avoidable disaster that killed 72 people.
When the inquiry examined the issue, chair Sir Martin Moore-Bick took evidence from Eric Pickles, the housing secretary under Cameron, who made the claim that his prime minister’s “red tape challenge” had specifically excluded fire safety.
The inquiry report said it was “unable to accept his evidence” on the issue, which was “flatly contradicted by that of his officials and by the contemporaneous documents”.
Cameron’s government had excluded one part of fire regulations, the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, the inquiry found, but not building regulations and other documents which had a material impact on how construction firms approached fire safety concerns. Pickles’s remarks “served only to reveal the limits of his understanding” about the difference, it said.
In its summary, the inquiry was explicit that “the government’s deregulatory agenda, enthusiastically supported by some junior ministers and [Pickles],dominated the department [for community, housing and local government]’s thinking to such an extent that even matters affecting the safety of life were ignored, delayed or disregarded.”
And it said the government “determinedly resisted calls from across the fire sector to regulate fire risk assessors and to amend the Fire Safety Order to make it clear that it applied to the exterior walls of buildings containing more than one set of domestic premises”.
The former prime minister chose to make his first statement since the report was published last Wednesday in a post on X, formerly Twitter, at 6pm on Friday evening.
Cameron said “all of us who have served in positions of power” had made mistakes and said he wanted to “echo” apologies by Keir Starmer and Rishi Sunak to survivors and the community, saying: “the British state let you down”.
Yet he claimed: “The report is clear that fire safety and building safety regulations were explicitly excluded from the Coalition Government’s greatly-needed ‘red tape reviews’, given the importance we placed on safety and build quality. Indeed, the Coalition and post-2015 governments took steps to increase fire safety regulation.”
Pete Apps, who won the Orwell Prize for his book Show Me the Bodies: How We Let Grenfell Happen, said Cameron’s statement was “demonstrably and very clearly total bullshit”.
“Cameron is making the same mistake Pickles did when giving evidence – conflating the regulatory reform order, which was exempt, with the building regulations, which weren’t,” he said, adding that the failures that contributed to Grenfell related to building regulations.
“Whoever wrote that statement for him either hasn’t read the report, has woefully misunderstood or is lying about its conclusions.”
Ed Daffarn, who survived the Grenfell fire, said Cameron and Pickles were acting in the same way as some of the corporations involved, denying culpability in the face of the inquiry’s findings and the impact of the ministerial drive to reduce regulation.
“I feel angry, but I’m not surprised,” said Daffarn. “The report is a damning indictment of a government that put UK plc before the health and safety of Grenfell. The result is that 72 people die because the regulations didn’t keep them safe.
“Cameron and Pickles are failing to take responsibility in the aftermath, despite the overwhelming evidence put before the inquiry and its findings.”
Giles Grover, co-leader of End Our Cladding Scandal, said “that’s bollocks” when told of Cameron’s comments.
“It was Cameron’s government’s focus on deregulation that played a key part in people’s homes not being safe,” Grover said. “His government wanted to ‘kill off the health and safety culture for good’ amid a ‘bonfire of red tape’, and this culture pervaded throughout government, including housing and building regulations, during his tenure as prime minister, whatever he may now wish to believe.”
The Grenfell Next of Kin group, which represents immediate bereaved families, said Cameron’s comments were “staggering”. A spokesperson for the group said: “Has he followed the inquiry or listened to the evidence? We heard quite clearly that from 2010 onwards the government pursued a drive that had a disdain for regulations.”
Masoumeh Samimi, 38, whose mother and aunt were killed in the fire on the 23rd floor, said: “David Cameron is talking without thinking, and his statement is ridiculous. They had a bonfire of regulations, with no regard to the lives of people.
“We buried the ashes of his “bonfire of regulation”. Samimi said she was told as recently as a year ago that police had found “another piece of bone” believed to be part of the remains of her mother.
Jennifer Frame, a former resident of Richmond House, which was destroyed by fire two years after Grenfell, said: “It is astonishing to see former prime ministers who held power and responsibility for the deregulatory culture which led to Grenfell trying to rewrite history to say they are blameless.
“This is just a continuation of the buck-passing and blame-shifting culture that was laid bare by the inquiry. If the political class cannot acknowledge their failings, then nothing will change.
“David Cameron boasted of cutting red tape, and he should not be surprised if the culture he presided over and the so-called ‘bonfire of regulations’ contributed to turning people’s homes into actual bonfires.”
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
A large fire was witnessed by residents of Liverpool Student Lettings accommodation in the early hours on January 27 2024. #LiverpoolEcho
Village of the damned: Inside the Fox Street fire
Special investigation: For years, Matt O'Donoghue was told about major problems at a controversial development in Everton. Then the dire predictions came true. By Matt O’Donoghue.
“Block D is an inferno right now”, the first message reads. “Look what’s been torched.” More follow. “Not sure how other blocks are faring, they’ve been evacuated.” Some have video or photos attached. “Seen this. I feel sick.” One simply reads: “Fox Street’s final chapter.”
Block D at the stalled residential development of Fox Street Village sits on the edge of Everton. It is ablaze, and a lot of people want me to know. As the firefighters battle to hold back the flames that threaten to leap from block to block, frantic calls, dramatic videos, and heartbreaking messages light up my phone screen. Many of those getting in touch are people I met over the past five years I’ve been reporting on the sorry saga of Fox Street Village. They’re all saying the same thing: “It was only a matter of time.”
“Something like this had to happen,” says Chris Burridge, who owns one of the Fox Street Village apartments as he surveys the damage. It’s Sunday, January 28th and the day after the fire. Steel girders are bent and buckled like roller coaster tracks; the metal cools and creaks, and loose material flaps in the wind. “There’s been no decent perimeter fence for some time, even though we’ve been reporting incidents. We were lucky Block B didn’t go up. The flames and heat were ferocious. Mersey Fire saved those buildings.”
Lucky indeed. Fox Street Village was originally intended to be a 400 apartment complex spread across four blocks that were to be four or five stories tall. But Block D was never completed and has remained an unfinished shell for the past five years. The rest of the site, on the other hand, is home to a number of residents. Had the fire spread there, it would have been catastrophic. Letting agents are on-site to support tenants and help with the clean up, while insurance brokers and risk assessors mill about around them. Lifts, heating, and water are soon back on. Black debris litters the ground and the flat roofs of the adjacent blocks, while clumps of burnt insulation and wood continue to drift from above.
A team from Residence 365, the company that manages the Village’s interior communal areas, is helping to get residents back into their homes. “Unfortunately, as the fire started to take hold, many residents in Block A failed to evacuate,” says Carolyn Delaney, Residence 365’s managing director. “Police had to force their way into every apartment to make sure that building was clear and everyone was safe. Those doors and frames will have to be repaired.”
Outside, Block B’s walls and windows are warped from where it faced the fire. The cladding is buckled and wavy, like bad icing on an overbaked cake. Most of the glass is cracked and broken, and window frames have bowed out of shape. The fire breaks under the cladding will have activated and expanded. There will need to be a lot of work to put things right.
“The grounds and estate management company are nowhere”, says an exasperated Burridge. The last he was told, a company called Xenia Estates Limited were responsible for looking after the outside areas. “It’s outrageous. They’ve sent nobody down here to help or make things safe.”
Kevin Robertson-Hale is a local campaigner who set up the action group Everton Together. He was shopping at the ASDA on the Breck Road when he first saw the black clouds rising above his community. He knew straight away what was likely to be burning. “It’s just a miracle that nobody’s been hurt,” he says. Although Block D was not a finished building, homeless people have been sleeping there and using it as a shelter. “The way the place went up, someone asleep would never have got out.” Kevin is horrified by what has happened, but certainly not surprised. “We’ve been saying for years that something was going to happen. Either someone was going to fall off and break their neck, or it was going to go up in flames.”
Beneath the debris and behind the spectacular videos, the plumes of smoke billowing out and up from the bare bones of blazing Block D, are hundreds of stories of loss and despair. To properly understand what went wrong at Fox Street Village, to learn why things must be fixed, we have to understand why they were broken in the first place.
Between 1971 and 1991, Everton’s population dropped by 60% as the area’s fortunes and prospects charted exactly the decline of the British Empire. As Liverpool’s docks fell silent, the huge warehouses and the factories like Tate and Lyle and British American Tobacco were closed. Thousands of jobs disappeared and the communities that once relied upon those goods shipped from all corners of the Empire ceased to exist. An urgent need to improve the area’s housing conditions, the crumbling Victorian tenements, led to slum clearance and demolition on a massive scale. Those once solid communities were broken up with families moved out and housed in places like Kirby, Runcorn and Skelmersdale. It was the perfect storm; shops closed, tower blocks were pulled down and the city’s terminal decline was hastened by Margaret Thatcher’s vicious attempts to starve the upstart council controlled by Hatton’s Militant Tendency into surrender.
Fox Street Village followed the same controversial funding model that has dogged similar schemes across the city, known as ‘fractional sales’. Buyers — many based overseas — are enticed with the promise of a good rent and a solid investment in return for paying a large part of the sale price upfront. But as countless investors at other stalled sites in Liverpool have discovered to their detriment, there’s little or no protection should things go wrong.
When Fox Street Village Limited collapsed into administration, in 2019, it owed creditors £10 million and the city council nearly £700,000. The council told us that an invoice for over half a million pounds remains unpaid but that the building’s new owners will have to pick up that tab. Meanwhile, £6 million that investors had paid out for Block D was instead spent on a new fifth building the developers had added to their scheme. A search of records show creditors who had paid for apartments in Block D came from Birkenhead to Beijing and all points in between. With no money left to complete the job, and no cash to settle their bills, the steel frame and internal walls made of wood have remained open to the elements. The freehold to the site was sold to Manchester-based property investment company SGL1 Limited in 2020 for a reported £1.6 million. The site was split and a separate company run by the same two directors as SGL1 but called SGL3, took over the unfinished Block D. A series of complex court cases followed as buyers battled to gain control and finish the scheme. By 2021, the architect’s original drawings for Block D had been rebranded as “Park View” to be marketed at a new group of buyers. A one bed studio in the unfinished wood and steel shell was being advertised for £85,000. The Post is unsure how many people bought into this new scheme or whether their money is protected.
“I bought a three-bedroom apartment that cost £135,000, which was a really good deal. With hindsight, almost too good to be true. I’ve been firefighting one problem after another since day one.” November 8th, 2023 and I am rattling along the M62 with Chris Burridge. “It doesn’t look that good,” Chris says with detached stoicism and monumental understatement as Fox Street Village Block D comes into view. “It would be funny, if it wasn’t so costly and dangerous.” Chris is one of the apartment owners who have been battling over an £80,000 bill to install a transformer that would safely reconnect their electricity to the grid. The builders left a hot-wired connection into the mains, which Chris says the buyers only found out about after they’d secured the right to manage some of the site. It was just the latest in a long line of hidden surprises that have revealed themselves over the five years since tenants moved in. “The biggest block, Block D, is just a shell that should have been finished years ago,” Chris tells me as we pull up alongside what looks like a building entirely made of wood and wrapped in tin foil. “There should have been one large, shared entrance area, an underground car park for 170 vehicles, shops, a cinema room with communal laundry, and a bike store. All of those amenities were what made this site so attractive.”
Chris pauses to re-imagine what could have been, before reality kicks back in. “None of that exists. What we’ve actually got are great apartments next to the rat-infested fire trap of a mess that is Block D.”
By Matt O’Donoghue
“Block D is an inferno right now”, the first message reads. “Look what’s been torched.” More follow. “Not sure how other blocks are faring, they’ve been evacuated.” Some have video or photos attached. “Seen this. I feel sick.” One simply reads: “Fox Street’s final chapter.”
Block D at the stalled residential development of Fox Street Village sits on the edge of Everton. It is ablaze, and a lot of people want me to know. As the firefighters battle to hold back the flames that threaten to leap from block to block, frantic calls, dramatic videos, and heartbreaking messages light up my phone screen. Many of those getting in touch are people I met over the past five years I’ve been reporting on the sorry saga of Fox Street Village. They’re all saying the same thing: “It was only a matter of time.”
Chris Burridge on Fox Street. Photo: Matt O’Donoghue.
“Something like this had to happen,” says Chris Burridge, who owns one of the Fox Street Village apartments as he surveys the damage. It’s Sunday, January 28th and the day after the fire. Steel girders are bent and buckled like roller coaster tracks; the metal cools and creaks, and loose material flaps in the wind. “There’s been no decent perimeter fence for some time, even though we’ve been reporting incidents. We were lucky Block B didn’t go up. The flames and heat were ferocious. Mersey Fire saved those buildings.”
Lucky indeed. Fox Street Village was originally intended to be a 400 apartment complex spread across four blocks that were to be four or five stories tall. But Block D was never completed and has remained an unfinished shell for the past five years. The rest of the site, on the other hand, is home to a number of residents. Had the fire spread there, it would have been catastrophic. Letting agents are on-site to support tenants and help with the clean up, while insurance brokers and risk assessors mill about around them. Lifts, heating, and water are soon back on. Black debris litters the ground and the flat roofs of the adjacent blocks, while clumps of burnt insulation and wood continue to drift from above.
A team from Residence 365, the company that manages the Village’s interior communal areas, is helping to get residents back into their homes. “Unfortunately, as the fire started to take hold, many residents in Block A failed to evacuate,” says Carolyn Delaney, Residence 365’s managing director. “Police had to force their way into every apartment to make sure that building was clear and everyone was safe. Those doors and frames will have to be repaired.”
Outside, Block B’s walls and windows are warped from where it faced the fire. The cladding is buckled and wavy, like bad icing on an overbaked cake. Most of the glass is cracked and broken, and window frames have bowed out of shape. The fire breaks under the cladding will have activated and expanded. There will need to be a lot of work to put things right.
“The grounds and estate management company are nowhere”, says an exasperated Burridge. The last he was told, a company called Xenia Estates Limited were responsible for looking after the outside areas. “It’s outrageous. They’ve sent nobody down here to help or make things safe.”
Subscribe
Kevin Robertson-Hale is a local campaigner who set up the action group Everton Together. He was shopping at the ASDA on the Breck Road when he first saw the black clouds rising above his community. He knew straight away what was likely to be burning. “It’s just a miracle that nobody’s been hurt,” he says. Although Block D was not a finished building, homeless people have been sleeping there and using it as a shelter. “The way the place went up, someone asleep would never have got out.” Kevin is horrified by what has happened, but certainly not surprised. “We’ve been saying for years that something was going to happen. Either someone was going to fall off and break their neck, or it was going to go up in flames.”
Beneath the debris and behind the spectacular videos, the plumes of smoke billowing out and up from the bare bones of blazing Block D, are hundreds of stories of loss and despair. To properly understand what went wrong at Fox Street Village, to learn why things must be fixed, we have to understand why they were broken in the first place.
The building on Fox Street. Photo: Chris Burridge
Between 1971 and 1991, Everton’s population dropped by 60% as the area’s fortunes and prospects charted exactly the decline of the British Empire. As Liverpool’s docks fell silent, the huge warehouses and the factories like Tate and Lyle and British American Tobacco were closed. Thousands of jobs disappeared and the communities that once relied upon those goods shipped from all corners of the Empire ceased to exist. An urgent need to improve the area’s housing conditions, the crumbling Victorian tenements, led to slum clearance and demolition on a massive scale. Those once solid communities were broken up with families moved out and housed in places like Kirby, Runcorn and Skelmersdale. It was the perfect storm; shops closed, tower blocks were pulled down and the city’s terminal decline was hastened by Margaret Thatcher’s vicious attempts to starve the upstart council controlled by Hatton’s Militant Tendency into surrender.
Stand on the edge of Fox Street today and look towards the gleaming glass skyscrapers and modern penthouses and it’s obvious, the regeneration that has breathed new life into other parts of Liverpool in recent years seems to run out of steam as it creeps towards this area’s streets. According to the last census, Everton West — where Fox Street Village sits — has the third highest numbers of children on free school meals. This neighbourhood has some of the poorest health indicators, including the lowest life expectancy, across the whole of the city.
As Liverpool’s reputation grew as a great place to study, the last decade has seen residential housing for the influx of students become the city’s short-term planning solution and a way to kickstart Everton’s economy.
Fox Street Village followed the same controversial funding model that has dogged similar schemes across the city, known as ‘fractional sales’. Buyers — many based overseas — are enticed with the promise of a good rent and a solid investment in return for paying a large part of the sale price upfront. But as countless investors at other stalled sites in Liverpool have discovered to their detriment, there’s little or no protection should things go wrong.
When Fox Street Village Limited collapsed into administration, in 2019, it owed creditors £10 million and the city council nearly £700,000. The council told us that an invoice for over half a million pounds remains unpaid but that the building’s new owners will have to pick up that tab. Meanwhile, £6 million that investors had paid out for Block D was instead spent on a new fifth building the developers had added to their scheme. A search of records show creditors who had paid for apartments in Block D came from Birkenhead to Beijing and all points in between. With no money left to complete the job, and no cash to settle their bills, the steel frame and internal walls made of wood have remained open to the elements. The freehold to the site was sold to Manchester-based property investment company SGL1 Limited in 2020 for a reported £1.6 million. The site was split and a separate company run by the same two directors as SGL1 but called SGL3, took over the unfinished Block D. A series of complex court cases followed as buyers battled to gain control and finish the scheme. By 2021, the architect’s original drawings for Block D had been rebranded as “Park View” to be marketed at a new group of buyers. A one bed studio in the unfinished wood and steel shell was being advertised for £85,000. The Post is unsure how many people bought into this new scheme or whether their money is protected.
“I bought a three-bedroom apartment that cost £135,000, which was a really good deal. With hindsight, almost too good to be true. I’ve been firefighting one problem after another since day one.” November 8th, 2023 and I am rattling along the M62 with Chris Burridge. “It doesn’t look that good,” Chris says with detached stoicism and monumental understatement as Fox Street Village Block D comes into view. “It would be funny, if it wasn’t so costly and dangerous.” Chris is one of the apartment owners who have been battling over an £80,000 bill to install a transformer that would safely reconnect their electricity to the grid. The builders left a hot-wired connection into the mains, which Chris says the buyers only found out about after they’d secured the right to manage some of the site. It was just the latest in a long line of hidden surprises that have revealed themselves over the five years since tenants moved in. “The biggest block, Block D, is just a shell that should have been finished years ago,” Chris tells me as we pull up alongside what looks like a building entirely made of wood and wrapped in tin foil. “There should have been one large, shared entrance area, an underground car park for 170 vehicles, shops, a cinema room with communal laundry, and a bike store. All of those amenities were what made this site so attractive.”
Chris pauses to re-imagine what could have been, before reality kicks back in. “None of that exists. What we’ve actually got are great apartments next to the rat-infested fire trap of a mess that is Block D.”
Residents in this area have been complaining to me about the rats for as long as I’ve been investigating Fox Street Village. Back in April 2019, I broke my first story on the slow-motion car crash that has taken place here — months of work as part of an ongoing investigation for ITV’s Granada Reports. Back then, tenant Ross Lowey told me on camera: “We don’t feel safe. Every time we come back round that corner, we expect to see flames coming out of it.” He was far from alone in his unhappy prophecy.
Six months before that first ITV News report, in November 2018, I had been on a separate investigation into how developers duck out of paying the millions they owed to their cash-strapped council. It suddenly took an unexpected twist. While I ploughed through a mountain of conflicting planning documents that link to this case, a buyer tipped me off that their building was about to be the first on Merseyside to be shut down and issued with a Prohibition Notice. It was the last-ditch resort for a city council that had run out of ideas on how to make this site safe. “Serious construction issues will contribute to the spread of fire,” the Prohibition Notice reads. “Fire will spread quickly and possibly unnoticed.”
Put simply, the problems that the buyers had uncovered at their completed flats were so severe that they put lives at risk. While Block D remained unfinished, three of the four blocks that people had already moved into were so dangerous that everyone would be forced to move out — immediately. Judge Lloyd would later brand the project “disgraceful” as she fined the developers £3,120 for breaching planning conditions. She expressed sympathy for the residents and investors who had been affected. Planning inspectors said the development was “poorly finished” and failed to meet standards. Those problems have cost hundreds of thousands of pounds to put right.
3
By Matt O’Donoghue
“Block D is an inferno right now”, the first message reads. “Look what’s been torched.” More follow. “Not sure how other blocks are faring, they’ve been evacuated.” Some have video or photos attached. “Seen this. I feel sick.” One simply reads: “Fox Street’s final chapter.”
Block D at the stalled residential development of Fox Street Village sits on the edge of Everton. It is ablaze, and a lot of people want me to know. As the firefighters battle to hold back the flames that threaten to leap from block to block, frantic calls, dramatic videos, and heartbreaking messages light up my phone screen. Many of those getting in touch are people I met over the past five years I’ve been reporting on the sorry saga of Fox Street Village. They’re all saying the same thing: “It was only a matter of time.”
Chris Burridge on Fox Street. Photo: Matt O’Donoghue.
“Something like this had to happen,” says Chris Burridge, who owns one of the Fox Street Village apartments as he surveys the damage. It’s Sunday, January 28th and the day after the fire. Steel girders are bent and buckled like roller coaster tracks; the metal cools and creaks, and loose material flaps in the wind. “There’s been no decent perimeter fence for some time, even though we’ve been reporting incidents. We were lucky Block B didn’t go up. The flames and heat were ferocious. Mersey Fire saved those buildings.”
Lucky indeed. Fox Street Village was originally intended to be a 400 apartment complex spread across four blocks that were to be four or five stories tall. But Block D was never completed and has remained an unfinished shell for the past five years. The rest of the site, on the other hand, is home to a number of residents. Had the fire spread there, it would have been catastrophic. Letting agents are on-site to support tenants and help with the clean up, while insurance brokers and risk assessors mill about around them. Lifts, heating, and water are soon back on. Black debris litters the ground and the flat roofs of the adjacent blocks, while clumps of burnt insulation and wood continue to drift from above.
A team from Residence 365, the company that manages the Village’s interior communal areas, is helping to get residents back into their homes. “Unfortunately, as the fire started to take hold, many residents in Block A failed to evacuate,” says Carolyn Delaney, Residence 365’s managing director. “Police had to force their way into every apartment to make sure that building was clear and everyone was safe. Those doors and frames will have to be repaired.”
Outside, Block B’s walls and windows are warped from where it faced the fire. The cladding is buckled and wavy, like bad icing on an overbaked cake. Most of the glass is cracked and broken, and window frames have bowed out of shape. The fire breaks under the cladding will have activated and expanded. There will need to be a lot of work to put things right.
“The grounds and estate management company are nowhere”, says an exasperated Burridge. The last he was told, a company called Xenia Estates Limited were responsible for looking after the outside areas. “It’s outrageous. They’ve sent nobody down here to help or make things safe.”
Subscribe
Kevin Robertson-Hale is a local campaigner who set up the action group Everton Together. He was shopping at the ASDA on the Breck Road when he first saw the black clouds rising above his community. He knew straight away what was likely to be burning. “It’s just a miracle that nobody’s been hurt,” he says. Although Block D was not a finished building, homeless people have been sleeping there and using it as a shelter. “The way the place went up, someone asleep would never have got out.” Kevin is horrified by what has happened, but certainly not surprised. “We’ve been saying for years that something was going to happen. Either someone was going to fall off and break their neck, or it was going to go up in flames.”
Beneath the debris and behind the spectacular videos, the plumes of smoke billowing out and up from the bare bones of blazing Block D, are hundreds of stories of loss and despair. To properly understand what went wrong at Fox Street Village, to learn why things must be fixed, we have to understand why they were broken in the first place.
The building on Fox Street. Photo: Chris Burridge
Between 1971 and 1991, Everton’s population dropped by 60% as the area’s fortunes and prospects charted exactly the decline of the British Empire. As Liverpool’s docks fell silent, the huge warehouses and the factories like Tate and Lyle and British American Tobacco were closed. Thousands of jobs disappeared and the communities that once relied upon those goods shipped from all corners of the Empire ceased to exist. An urgent need to improve the area’s housing conditions, the crumbling Victorian tenements, led to slum clearance and demolition on a massive scale. Those once solid communities were broken up with families moved out and housed in places like Kirby, Runcorn and Skelmersdale. It was the perfect storm; shops closed, tower blocks were pulled down and the city’s terminal decline was hastened by Margaret Thatcher’s vicious attempts to starve the upstart council controlled by Hatton’s Militant Tendency into surrender.
Stand on the edge of Fox Street today and look towards the gleaming glass skyscrapers and modern penthouses and it’s obvious, the regeneration that has breathed new life into other parts of Liverpool in recent years seems to run out of steam as it creeps towards this area’s streets. According to the last census, Everton West — where Fox Street Village sits — has the third highest numbers of children on free school meals. This neighbourhood has some of the poorest health indicators, including the lowest life expectancy, across the whole of the city.
As Liverpool’s reputation grew as a great place to study, the last decade has seen residential housing for the influx of students become the city’s short-term planning solution and a way to kickstart Everton’s economy.
Fox Street Village followed the same controversial funding model that has dogged similar schemes across the city, known as ‘fractional sales’. Buyers — many based overseas — are enticed with the promise of a good rent and a solid investment in return for paying a large part of the sale price upfront. But as countless investors at other stalled sites in Liverpool have discovered to their detriment, there’s little or no protection should things go wrong.
When Fox Street Village Limited collapsed into administration, in 2019, it owed creditors £10 million and the city council nearly £700,000. The council told us that an invoice for over half a million pounds remains unpaid but that the building’s new owners will have to pick up that tab. Meanwhile, £6 million that investors had paid out for Block D was instead spent on a new fifth building the developers had added to their scheme. A search of records show creditors who had paid for apartments in Block D came from Birkenhead to Beijing and all points in between. With no money left to complete the job, and no cash to settle their bills, the steel frame and internal walls made of wood have remained open to the elements. The freehold to the site was sold to Manchester-based property investment company SGL1 Limited in 2020 for a reported £1.6 million. The site was split and a separate company run by the same two directors as SGL1 but called SGL3, took over the unfinished Block D. A series of complex court cases followed as buyers battled to gain control and finish the scheme. By 2021, the architect’s original drawings for Block D had been rebranded as “Park View” to be marketed at a new group of buyers. A one bed studio in the unfinished wood and steel shell was being advertised for £85,000. The Post is unsure how many people bought into this new scheme or whether their money is protected.
Fox Street after the fire. Photo: Chris Burridge
“I bought a three-bedroom apartment that cost £135,000, which was a really good deal. With hindsight, almost too good to be true. I’ve been firefighting one problem after another since day one.” November 8th, 2023 and I am rattling along the M62 with Chris Burridge. “It doesn’t look that good,” Chris says with detached stoicism and monumental understatement as Fox Street Village Block D comes into view. “It would be funny, if it wasn’t so costly and dangerous.” Chris is one of the apartment owners who have been battling over an £80,000 bill to install a transformer that would safely reconnect their electricity to the grid. The builders left a hot-wired connection into the mains, which Chris says the buyers only found out about after they’d secured the right to manage some of the site. It was just the latest in a long line of hidden surprises that have revealed themselves over the five years since tenants moved in. “The biggest block, Block D, is just a shell that should have been finished years ago,” Chris tells me as we pull up alongside what looks like a building entirely made of wood and wrapped in tin foil. “There should have been one large, shared entrance area, an underground car park for 170 vehicles, shops, a cinema room with communal laundry, and a bike store. All of those amenities were what made this site so attractive.”
Chris pauses to re-imagine what could have been, before reality kicks back in. “None of that exists. What we’ve actually got are great apartments next to the rat-infested fire trap of a mess that is Block D.”
The author Matt O’Donoghue on ITV. Photo: ITC/IMDb.
Residents in this area have been complaining to me about the rats for as long as I’ve been investigating Fox Street Village. Back in April 2019, I broke my first story on the slow-motion car crash that has taken place here — months of work as part of an ongoing investigation for ITV’s Granada Reports. Back then, tenant Ross Lowey told me on camera: “We don’t feel safe. Every time we come back round that corner, we expect to see flames coming out of it.” He was far from alone in his unhappy prophecy.
Six months before that first ITV News report, in November 2018, I had been on a separate investigation into how developers duck out of paying the millions they owed to their cash-strapped council. It suddenly took an unexpected twist. While I ploughed through a mountain of conflicting planning documents that link to this case, a buyer tipped me off that their building was about to be the first on Merseyside to be shut down and issued with a Prohibition Notice. It was the last-ditch resort for a city council that had run out of ideas on how to make this site safe. “Serious construction issues will contribute to the spread of fire,” the Prohibition Notice reads. “Fire will spread quickly and possibly unnoticed.”
Put simply, the problems that the buyers had uncovered at their completed flats were so severe that they put lives at risk. While Block D remained unfinished, three of the four blocks that people had already moved into were so dangerous that everyone would be forced to move out — immediately. Judge Lloyd would later brand the project “disgraceful” as she fined the developers £3,120 for breaching planning conditions. She expressed sympathy for the residents and investors who had been affected. Planning inspectors said the development was “poorly finished” and failed to meet standards. Those problems have cost hundreds of thousands of pounds to put right.
Subscribe
The council say that it was only after the buildings were largely constructed that it became apparent there was a failure to comply with conditions or the plans that had been passed. When the new owners submitted another application to make up for the missing car park, a fresh deal was struck for them to pay towards a cycle route and parking scheme. But planning approval was refused when no money was forthcoming.
Two companies were involved in the development of Fox Street Village: Linmari Construction Limited and Fox Street Village Limited. Both were run by company director, Gary Howard. In 2013, Howard was left as the sole director of Fox Street Student Halls Limited after his business partner, Lee Carroll, was forced to step down. Carroll had been found guilty of being a gang master under legislation brought in to tackle labour exploitation after an investigation into a recruitment company that Carroll ran with John Howard. Carroll was banned from being a company director for 12 years.
While nothing should be inferred from Gary Howard’s previous business history, six companies where he was a director and shareholder have a County Court Judgement against them. Just like Fox Street Village Limited, seven firms that Howard also once helped run have gone into administration owing money to creditors — two of which were also residential developments in Liverpool designed for student living. We’ve been unable to contact Mr Howard for a comment.
“The frameworks that are supposed to deliver safe buildings, protect their owners and keep those inside safe are not up to the job,” says Dr Len Gibbs, whose doctoral thesis focused on the problems with unfinished developments in the Liverpool area.
That regulatory framework — to get a building through from an architect’s drawings to the point of being occupied — can be roughly broken down into two stages: planning and building control. The first part is strictly controlled by rules and regulations that must be met and followed to the letter. A council department controls the planning process, and everything has to be approved by a committee after a rigorous assessment by trained officers. Once it passes and everybody agrees that the buildings are what the council and community needs, the proposals are said to have ‘gained consent’.
When developers have their planning consent, a building control team comes on board to oversee every step of the construction. Site inspectors visit to approve stages such as the foundations and drains, and the relevant paperwork is filed with the city council to confirm everything has progressed according to the plans that were submitted and in accordance with the required regulations. In theory, these two functions operate independently but in support of one another to deliver a building that doesn’t kill the people who move in.
That’s something of a simplification, but these are incredibly complex areas that require years of training to properly understand. Only when every step has been followed can a completion certificate be issued against the building and each individual apartment. These final pieces of paper confirm that everything is up to standard and legally ready for tenants to move in. If all these steps are followed correctly, then a development of buildings that were once judged to be a threat to the lives of residents should never be occupied. Yet they were occupied.
#liverpoolstudentlettings#Liverpool student letting#2024#fire#Liverpool echo#fox street studios#video#viralpost#liverpool#student#Liverpool students#January 2024#blaze#merseyside#Fox Street Village#Matt O'Donoghue#itv
8 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Queen Camilla’s Patronages
Wiltshire Bobby Van Trust (Patron from 06.06.2005)
The Wiltshire Bobby Van Trust (WBVT) provides a home security service for elderly, vulnerable and disadvantaged people throughout Wiltshire. The charity operates two Bobby vans that provide mobile workshops for Bobby operators. Operators are skilled carpenter/lockfitters, Home Office trained Crime Reduction Officers, Fire Risk Assessors and are well versed in giving support to victims. The Trust works closely with Wiltshire Police and to provide reassurance to clients that a visit from the charity is genuine, van livery, uniforms and identification resemble that of the police. Bobby vans are directed to their tasks by coordinators working from an operations room, who receive referrals, decide on work priorities and despatch the vans using sophisticated communications equipment. On arrival the operators conduct a security audit and then fit necessary security equipment to ensure the home is safe; in addition they carry out a Fire Risk Assessment and fit smoke detectors when this is appropriate. Finally, all aspects of home, personal and fire safety are discussed and practical measures provided. The service is provided free of charge. WBVT helps elderly, vulnerable and disadvantaged people who have been victims of, or are considered to be at risk of, house crime, hate crime or domestic violence. The Trust was set up in 1998; the first of its kind to be established in England. It is overseen by a board of Trustees chaired by Robert Hiscox, and the charity is managed on behalf of the Trustees by Jennie Shaw, Director. The charity works with Wiltshire Police and Wiltshire Fire & Rescue Service, as well as a number of other agencies, to ensure that the most effective use is made of facilities available and those in need of help receive it promptly.
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
I Just Watched Ant-Man So I'm Making It Everyone Else's Problem
1
-----
"You said you wanted to go the quantum realm?"
Sisi was puzzled. She hadn't heard of this before, only in movies. The Ant-Man movie to be exact. Her least favorite marvel movie.
"Yeah, it's totally possible!" Yumi was walking around erratically in his garage laboratory, one that Sisi knew she shouldn't be standing in.
"No... I don't think that's a good idea, Yumi. That's... actually insane."
"Sisi... you shouldn't doubt me like that."
Yumi was leaning over a table, one of the ones that's set up at a barbecue. The white vinyl ones. It had some sort of contraption that likened to a gumball machine. Sisi didn't want to look at it anymore. It could only mean trouble.
"Does Daniel know you're using the garage for this?" She asked.
Yumi rubbed his chin. He'd be lying if he said Daniel was okay with all this. Actually, he'd be lying if he said Daniel knew about this at all. Yumi knew that this was all guaranteed to go to disaster if he knew. There was only a slighter smaller chance of all this going wrong if he didn't. He'd go with that.
"Here... Sisi. Let's just keep this between us, okay. It would be better if this was our little secret, hm?"
Sisi crossed her arms. This already sounded like a terrible idea. And it just kept getting worse.
"That's what shady people say about things that are gonna turn out badly."
Yumi bit his lip and nodded. Sisi could count on her ten fingers the good ideas he's had. She'd have to use all the stars in the sky to count the bad ones. She just knew this was one of them
"Okay, whatever. Show me how this thing works then."
Some part of her was skeptical that it actually worked at all. That brought her some comfort.
Yumi walked over to the counter by the window, getting some dust particles off the machine cog he picked up. It was something so futuristic, Sisi could have sworn she'd seen it in Tron or Blade Runner or literally any movie. Sisi thought she should stop thinking about this whole thing like it was a movie. Then something tragic would happen to her, like in the movies. Except it wouldn't be romantic, fun, cute, or anything like that. It would be scary as hell and she would probably die.
"Okay, you take this. This is the switch. The switch connects to this lever. Well it's not really a lever; it's more like a dial. And you turn it like a radio. The thing about the quantum realm is that, it's not just one place like they make it seem in the movie. It's a spectrum of places, of universes smaller... and bigger... than this one."
Sisi nodded her head in understanding. She knew the whole thing about light being a spectrum, and gender being a spectrum, and sexuality being a spectrum... and this kind of sounded like that. She understood that. Except none of those other things were dangerous. All she could think about was how fucking dangerous this shit was.
"Keep going."
"Okay, and when you turn the dial to the left, you can access all of the communication waves that we can send down to those smaller universes. There's a spectrum like I said. And you turn it until you can get to the right frequency, and establish a connection to that plain of existence."
"Kinda like a telephone?"
"Yeah, like a telephone."
"You're gonna call the Quantum Realm?"
"Yeah... well no. It's like the Quantum realm is calling me."
Ha ha ha. Very fucking funny.
"Okay so when you get to the right frequency, then what?"
Yumi ran his hands through his long hair. He should have it in a ponytail or a bun or something. What if some fire comes out of the Quantum Realm and roasts his ass like a Thanksgiving turkey? That's how Sisi was thinking. She was like the resident risk assessor of their found family. Dan was the risk prohibitor. Yumi was the walking risk. Charlie was usually what inspired said risk, and there they would be, fighting for their fucking lives.
"When you get to the right frequency, you grab..."
He reached over and turned a few machine parts on the table, shoveling and sifting through them like they were just some dirty laundry on his room floor.
"You grab one of these..."
"What's that?"
I'm about to tell you." Yumi said.
"I'm waiting to know..."
"It's a hydro-paula-icitatortron.... or something."
"Oh, that sounds so official and gives me so much confidence," Sisi told him, rolling her pretty green eyes in exasperation.
"Your sarcasm is enchanting, really."
"Okay seriously, what actually is it."
"It's the locator. So kinda like in Minecraft, you know you have the coordinates?"
Sisi nodded. It insulted her a little bit that Yumi had to resort to Minecraft analogies to get her to understand his science project that could potentially get her killed. But if that's what he had to do, then that's what he had to do. And Sisi would listen, because she's not too proud for that.
"Yeah, it helps me know where I am when I'm mining and when I die, I can go back to that exact spot."
Yumi lights up. His pearly white teeth looked clean. Looking clean and being clean were two different things, but they were probably the cleanest thing on his body. He looked like he had been down here for days, wearing the same clothes he did the last time Sisi saw him. Which was.... a couple of days ago.
"Yes!" He points at her, bright blue eyes wide with excitement. He was excited to teach her something. He was passionate about this type of science. He thought he'd be an IT nerd for the rest of his life but Marvel movies really inspired him. So it was like Marvel Movies and the Dark Web had gotten married and created this Illegal Quantum Realm Catastrophe that Yumi had become obsessed with. Today would mark somewhere around three years.
"Yes! exactly, exactly. So with the locator, we find the exact coordinates that we had come across using the..."
"The switch"
"Yeah... with the switch!"
That's why Yumi gave all his tools and objects simple names. He was a scientist, but a scatterbrained one. He might as well have instruction manuals on everything too. There were multicolored post-it notes on every surface... so it was practically the same thing.
"So when we get the coordinates from the locator..."
Sisi leaned over cautiously to see more closely just was Yumi was going on about. It looked like one of those headers in the Time Square, or like Wall Street, with the pixelized information and text floating across the interface over and over. but those were words. Movie times and stocks and headlines and stuff. Those things Sisi could understand. This looked like something she had seen in her college physics course but hook it up to an IV and put whatever Dolph Lundgren and Arnold Schwarzenegger had taken for all those years directly into it. But multiply it by one hundred thousand infinity. How could Yumi even understand this?"
"We put these coordinates in here."
There was a separate part of the machine. A kind of annex, but it looked even more important than the first part. Yumi used a keyboard that looked like it was from like Star Trek or something to type in the same text from the first machine part.
"Yumi... Are we done with the MasterClass or what?"
"Hold on... I can't get this part wrong. If there's a single mistake, it could be really bad."
"Wait... then how'd you make this thing if you couldn't make any mistakes. Isn't that what science is? A bunch of mistakes until you've found something even semi-concrete."
There was silence for a few more seconds until Yumi was done transcribing the Klingon.
"Well... yeah. That's kinda the thing Sisi. I just built this. And what I'm doing now... I'm gonna test it."
Sisi went cold.
She thought of every possible thing that could go wrong. Every possible outcome that resulted in her getting obliterated, fried, disintegrated, or lost forever in a world she had no idea ever existed. She looked at Yumi with a blank stare. One that she tried to break, but just couldn't.
"You... can't be serious Yumi." A nervous chuckle came from her lips. She quickly realized, when he didn't shift, smile, laugh, or blurt out 'just kidding!', she realized he was dead serious. And the dead part might be the most relevant right now.
"No. I'm telling Dan."
She turned and marched up the garage steps to the door that led to the house. Yumi had caught her wrist before she could get too far.
"No!"
Yumi Ishizaki was shaking. He hadn't really felt this way about anything else before. He found a passion. He had a boring life before, such a boring life that going to a Marvel Movie would be the highlight of his fucking 3 month quarter. But now, after all this hard work and research and sleepless nights with something like this keeping him going... he felt like he finally found a passion. A purpose. And sure, maybe he thought he felt like that when he got a new job or a relationship or something, but this was the first time he felt like he was doing something that was actually gonna matter. Yumi didn't wanna die without doing anything spectacular. This was fucking spectacular. And he would be damned if Daniel was gonna come in here and smash up 5 long years of hard work because Sisi cried wolf.
"No, Sisi. Wait. Please. Don't tell him. I'll do anything. Just... I need this."
Salice had tears in her eyes. Alarmed tears. Her heart was racing and she was shaking too. Not because this was considered her life's work or anything, but because this type of invention could make short work of her life! And Yumi's and Daniel's and everyone who lived in this house, on this street, in the neighborhood, or even on the fucking planet. This was not meant to be some garage project. This type of information belonged to some powerful, invisible people that Salice would never know and would be okay with not knowing. Because, unlike Yumi, she was okay with the life she'd built here. She was okay with her messy, on-again-off-again relationship with Daniel. Her sisterhood with Charlie. And the best friend she had come to find in Yumi. And she would be damned if something like a stupid, silly garage project ate her family up like a three-week-old genetic material that turned into a monster and ambushed a 2nd grader as he opened his lunchbox.
"Yumi... I can't let you do that. It's dangerous... thank you for telling me... but I can't."
Yumi was practically begging her now. "Please, please. I'll wait, I'll hold off on testing it, just please don't make me quit doing this. This is... something amazing. Something I don't wanna lose.
Sisi was empathetic to him, but only so much that she rubbed his hands a bit before taking a few steps out of his grasp.
"Okay... Fine. But... I have some conditions.
---
"We have to call someone who actually studied this..."
Sisi thought about this logically and rationally. If they were gonna do some stupid shit like this, they needed someone who knew the official ins and outs of everything theoretical and hypothetical that could happen. Someone who could save their asses if things went horribly and terribly and inevitably wrong.
"Where are we gonna find someone like that? I mean, all the guys I was looking at research from are like fifty-year-old men who live in another country."
Sisi smiled bittersweetly. She knew someone like that. She knew someone who would be excellent for this type of thing. But she didn't really wanna call him. Not after everything they'd been through. Not for a favor, anyways. She couldn't call him to ask how he was doing, so it would be ten times harder to ask for a favor.
"I know a guy. He lives in another country, yes, but he's more like thirty-two."
Yumi was hapless. Who could Sisi possibly know that knew anything about Quantum Physics?
"Who? Can you call him now?"
"Just.... hold on. I'll call him this week. We're not doing anything else until he gets here."
Yumi's next question was if he could trust him. A lot of people would be at his throat for this work of his. Especially because he managed, in theory, to figure this all out in a garage with one-sixteenth of the budget of any lab at any worthwhile university or institution. And people would be out to steal all their credit. They'd maybe even go as far as to trap them in the Quantum Realm to keep the public from finding out about all this if they were really so evil.
"Wait... who is it, Sisi?"
"He... He's a really close friend."
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
NEBOSH IGC in Occupational Health and Safety
The NEBOSH International General Certificate (IGC) in Occupational Health and Safety is a globally recognized qualification designed for individuals working in or aiming to work in health and safety roles across various industries. It provides a strong foundation in the principles of health and safety management, risk assessment, and legal requirements, enabling professionals to manage workplace risks effectively.
Key Features of NEBOSH IGC:
Internationally Recognized Qualification: NEBOSH IGC is one of the most respected certifications for health and safety professionals worldwide. It aligns with international standards such as those set by the International Labour Organization (ILO).
Ideal for Beginners and Experienced Professionals: The course is suitable for those new to health and safety, as well as those with some experience seeking to formalize their knowledge or advance their careers.
Wide Applicability: It covers the essential health and safety principles applicable in a range of industries, including manufacturing, construction, oil and gas, hospitality, and more.
NEBOSH IGC Course Structure:
The course is divided into two main units, each focusing on different aspects of health and safety management:
Unit IG1: Management of Health and Safety
This unit covers the core principles of managing health and safety in a workplace environment.
Elements:
Why we should manage workplace health and safety
How health and safety management systems work and what they look like
Managing risk – understanding people and processes
Health and safety monitoring and measuring
Legal frameworks and health and safety laws (international focus)
Assessment: IG1 is assessed through an open-book examination. In this exam, candidates must demonstrate their knowledge by applying health and safety principles to real-life workplace scenarios.
Unit IG2: Risk Assessment
This unit focuses on identifying and managing workplace hazards.
Elements:
Physical and psychological health hazards (e.g., noise, stress, musculoskeletal injuries)
Musculoskeletal health (manual handling, ergonomic risks)
Chemical and biological agents (control measures for hazardous substances)
Workplace hazards (fire, electrical, machinery, slips, trips, falls)
Transportation hazards (safety in road and transportation)
Assessment: IG2 is assessed through a practical risk assessment project. Candidates must conduct a risk assessment in their own workplace or a simulated environment, demonstrating their ability to identify hazards and recommend control measures.
Course Delivery Options:
NEBOSH IGC can be taken through a variety of learning formats:
Classroom Training: Delivered in-person by accredited NEBOSH learning partners.
Online Learning: Offers flexibility for professionals to study at their own pace.
Blended Learning: Combines online study with classroom workshops.
NEBOSH IGC Exam and Certification:
IG1: Open-book examination based on scenario-based questions, typically followed by a closing interview to verify knowledge.
IG2: A workplace-based risk assessment report that demonstrates practical application of knowledge.
Who Should Take the NEBOSH IGC?
Health and Safety Professionals: Individuals looking to formalize or advance their knowledge in health and safety management.
Managers and Supervisors: Those with health and safety responsibilities in their teams or departments.
Aspiring Safety Officers: Individuals seeking a career as a safety officer or health and safety specialist.
HR and Compliance Managers: Who are responsible for workplace safety policies and procedures.
Anyone Working in High-Risk Industries: Such as construction, manufacturing, oil and gas, or chemical processing.
Benefits of NEBOSH IGC:
Improved Job Prospects: Many employers worldwide look for candidates with NEBOSH IGC certification for roles such as Health and Safety Officer, Safety Advisor, or Risk Assessor.
Legal and Regulatory Knowledge: The course covers important health and safety legislation and provides the knowledge needed to ensure compliance with international safety standards.
Practical Skills Development: The risk assessment project allows candidates to apply their learning to real-life situations, improving their ability to manage workplace risks.
Membership Opportunities: NEBOSH IGC holders are eligible for membership with professional safety bodies such as:
IOSH (Institution of Occupational Safety and Health) at the Technical Member (TechIOSH) level.
IIRSM (International Institute of Risk and Safety Management) at the Associate Member level.
Foundation for Further Study: The IGC serves as a pathway to more advanced qualifications such as the NEBOSH International Diploma, which can lead to senior health and safety roles.
Career Opportunities:
Upon completing the NEBOSH IGC, graduates are equipped to pursue various roles in occupational health and safety, such as:
Health and Safety Officer
Health and Safety Advisor
Safety Coordinator
Risk Assessor
Compliance Officer
Environment, Health, and Safety (EHS) Specialist
Safety Auditor
Safety Manager
Conclusion:
The NEBOSH International General Certificate (IGC) in Occupational Health and Safety is a vital qualification for those looking to build or advance a career in health and safety. It offers a solid foundation in managing workplace risks and ensures that professionals are equipped to create safer working environments globally.
safety course in chennai
safety course in madurai
safety course in ambattur
nebosh course in chennai
nebosh course in madurai
nebosh course in ambattur
#safety institute in chennai#safety institute in madurai#safety course in ambattur#nebosh course in madurai
0 notes
Text
Fire Warden Training Course & Certification - FireReady Australia
What is the fire warden training?
Fire warden training, also known as fire marshal training, is a specialized fire safety course designed for individuals who have been assigned the role of fire warden or fire marshal within an organization. Fire wardens play a crucial role in ensuring the safety of occupants in buildings during fire emergencies. The training equips them with the knowledge and skills necessary to effectively carry out their responsibilities.
Here are some key components typically covered in fire warden training:
Fire Safety Regulations and Legal Requirements: Understanding the relevant fire safety regulations, codes, and legal obligations that apply to buildings and premises. This includes knowledge of local fire safety legislation and standards.
Fire Prevention and Risk Assessment: Identifying potential fire hazards in the workplace, assessing the level of risk, and implementing appropriate preventive measures. This may involve understanding the proper storage and handling of flammable materials, maintaining clear escape routes, and ensuring the availability and functionality of fire safety equipment.
Emergency Action Planning: Developing and implementing an emergency action plan specific to the organization's premises. This includes establishing evacuation procedures, conducting regular drills, and designating assembly points.
Fire Detection and Alarm Systems: Familiarizing participants with the types and operation of fire detection and alarm systems, including smoke detectors, heat detectors, manual call points, and central monitoring systems. Understanding how to respond to fire alarms and initiate the evacuation process.
Evacuation Procedures and Techniques: Learning effective evacuation techniques, including crowd management, assisting individuals with disabilities or mobility challenges, and conducting evacuations in different scenarios and environments.
Fire Extinguisher Training: Gaining practical knowledge on the selection, use, and limitations of fire extinguishers. Understanding the different types of extinguishers and their appropriate applications. Hands-on training may be provided to practice using fire extinguishers safely.
Communication and Coordination: Developing effective communication strategies during a fire emergency, including raising the alarm, notifying emergency services, and providing clear instructions to building occupants. Coordinating with emergency responders and assisting in their efforts.
Fire Safety Inspections and Maintenance: Understanding the importance of regular inspections and maintenance of fire safety equipment and systems. Identifying and reporting faults or deficiencies to the responsible authorities or maintenance personnel.
Fire warden training is typically conducted by qualified fire safety professionals, fire departments, or specialized training providers. The course duration and format may vary, ranging from a few hours to a full day of training, and can be delivered through classroom sessions, practical exercises, and interactive discussions.
Upon completion of fire warden training, participants may receive a certification or a recognized qualification, depending on the training provider. This certification serves as evidence of their competency in fire safety and their ability to fulfill the role of a fire warden or fire marshal effectively.
How often do you need to do fire warden training?
The frequency of fire warden training can vary depending on several factors, including local regulations, industry requirements, and organizational policies. While there is no universal standard, it is generally recommended to refresh fire warden training periodically to ensure that individuals remain knowledgeable and competent in their roles. Here are some considerations:
Legal and Regulatory Requirements: Some jurisdictions may have specific requirements regarding the frequency of fire warden training. It is important to consult local fire safety regulations and codes to determine any mandated training intervals.
Industry Standards and Best Practices: Certain industries, such as healthcare, education, or high-risk environments, may have industry-specific guidelines or recommendations for fire warden training frequency. These guidelines often take into account the unique risks and circumstances of the industry.
Organizational Policies: Employers or building owners may establish their own policies on fire warden training frequency based on internal risk assessments and the specific needs of their premises. These policies may outline the recommended interval for refresher training.
Changes in Roles or Responsibilities: If there are changes in the organization's fire safety procedures, building layout, or fire safety equipment, it is essential to provide updated training to fire wardens to ensure they are knowledgeable about these changes.
In general, a common recommendation is to refresh fire warden training every one to three years. This interval allows individuals to stay up to date with any changes in fire safety practices, regulations, and technologies. However, it is important to note that more frequent refresher training may be necessary in certain circumstances or industries where risks are higher or turnover of fire wardens is more frequent.
#eco training program brisbane#fire training service brisbane#fire safety trainer brisbane#fire safety training brisbane#emergency plan advisor brisbane#fire risk assessors brisbane#site emergency plan brisbane#fire safety assessment brisbane#brisbane emergency plans
0 notes
Text
How good is an industrial safety course?
An Industrial Safety Course is highly valuable and beneficial for individuals pursuing careers in safety management, particularly in industries like manufacturing, construction, oil and gas, chemicals, and more. These courses provide specialized knowledge and skills to ensure a safe working environment, prevent workplace accidents, and promote regulatory compliance. The importance of industrial safety cannot be overstated, especially in industries with significant hazards.
Key Benefits of an Industrial Safety Course:
Increased Job Opportunities:
High Demand: There is a growing demand for safety professionals in industries where safety regulations and standards are critical. Employers actively seek individuals who have formal training in industrial safety.
Diverse Career Paths: Industrial safety graduates can pursue careers as safety officers, safety engineers, environmental health and safety (EHS) managers, risk assessors, and safety auditors in sectors like manufacturing, oil and gas, mining, construction, and chemicals.
Ensuring Workplace Safety:
Preventing Accidents: These courses teach how to identify workplace hazards, conduct risk assessments, and implement safety protocols that significantly reduce the risk of accidents.
Knowledge of Safety Standards: Participants learn about national and international safety regulations, including OSHA, NEBOSH, ISO standards, and other industry-specific safety standards, ensuring compliance with legal and safety obligations.
Advanced Skills and Knowledge:
Hazard Management: Industrial safety courses focus on identifying hazards specific to industries, such as electrical, chemical, mechanical, or biological hazards, and managing them effectively.
Emergency Preparedness: Trainees learn how to prepare for and manage emergencies such as fires, explosions, or chemical spills, and how to coordinate evacuations and response strategies.
Use of Safety Equipment: The course teaches proper use of safety gear, personal protective equipment (PPE), and firefighting tools, which are essential in high-risk environments.
Legal Compliance and Risk Reduction:
Compliance with Regulations: Industrial safety courses ensure that safety professionals understand the legal frameworks and safety regulations relevant to their industry, helping companies avoid fines and legal complications.
Reduced Workplace Risks: Properly trained safety personnel help businesses reduce the frequency and severity of workplace incidents, which can lead to lower insurance costs and fewer liabilities.
Environmental Protection:
Sustainability: Many industrial safety courses also focus on environmental safety, teaching methods to reduce environmental hazards, manage waste, and comply with environmental regulations.
Reducing Environmental Impact: By incorporating environmental safety into their operations, industries can minimize their ecological footprint, improving both safety and sustainability.
Career Growth and Professional Recognition:
Certifications: An industrial safety course often provides globally recognized certifications such as OSHA or NEBOSH, which can enhance credibility and open doors to international job opportunities.
Higher Salary Potential: Safety professionals are highly valued in hazardous industries, and those with advanced certifications and experience can command higher salaries.
Personal Satisfaction:
Contributing to a Safer Environment: Safety professionals often feel a strong sense of accomplishment and responsibility, knowing that their work helps protect the well-being of employees and the environment.
Continuous Learning: Industrial safety is a field that evolves with new technologies, practices, and regulations, offering professionals opportunities for lifelong learning and career advancement.
Types of Industrial Safety Courses:
Diploma in Industrial Safety: A comprehensive course that covers all aspects of industrial safety management, hazard control, and accident prevention.
Certificate Programs: Short-term courses that focus on specific aspects of safety, such as fire safety, chemical safety, or environmental safety.
Advanced Safety Courses: Programs like NEBOSH International General Certificate or OSHA certification are more advanced and internationally recognized.
Specialized Training: Industry-specific safety courses, such as construction safety or oil and gas safety, focus on the unique hazards of those sectors.
Conclusion:
An Industrial Safety Course is an excellent choice for those looking to build a career in safety management, especially in high-risk industries. It equips individuals with critical skills, increases job opportunities, ensures compliance with safety regulations, and contributes to the overall well-being of workers and the environment. Given the increasing focus on safety and sustainability in industries worldwide, the value of an industrial safety course is only expected to grow.
iosh course in madurai
industrial safety course in madurai
safety course in madurai
fire and safety course in madurai
nebosh course in madurai
0 notes
Text
Fire Risk Assessment: A Crucial Step in Ensuring Safety | Incer.co.uk
In today’s world, where safety and compliance are paramount, a thorough fire risk assessment is not just a legal obligation but a critical step in safeguarding lives and properties. At Floor Plan we understand the importance of a comprehensive fire risk assessment and are dedicated to helping businesses and property owners meet these essential requirements.
What is a Fire Risk Assessment?
A fire risk assessment is a systematic process aimed at identifying potential fire hazards within a building or workplace. The assessment evaluates the likelihood of a fire starting and the potential impact it could have on people and property. It also involves identifying and implementing measures to minimize or eliminate these risks.
Fire risk assessments are not just for compliance; they are an essential part of a broader strategy to protect lives and assets from the devastating effects of fire.
Why is Fire Risk Assessment Important?
Legal Compliance: In the UK, it is a legal requirement under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 to carry out regular fire risk assessments. Failure to comply can result in severe penalties, including fines and imprisonment.
Protection of Life: The primary goal of a fire risk assessment is to protect lives. By identifying potential fire hazards and implementing appropriate safety measures, the risk of injury or fatality is significantly reduced.
Property Protection: Fires can cause extensive damage to buildings, leading to costly repairs and even the loss of business. A fire risk assessment helps to identify areas where fires are more likely to start and recommends actions to prevent them, thus protecting your property.
Insurance Requirements: Many insurance companies require a fire risk assessment to be in place before they will provide coverage. Without it, you may find yourself without the necessary protection in the event of a fire.
Peace of Mind: Knowing that your premises have been assessed and that you have taken all reasonable steps to reduce fire risk can provide peace of mind for you, your employees, and your customers.
What Does a Fire Risk Assessment Involve?
A fire risk assessment typically involves the following steps:
Identifying Fire Hazards: This includes identifying sources of ignition, fuel, and oxygen within the premises.
Identifying People at Risk: This step involves assessing who might be at risk in the event of a fire, including employees, visitors, and anyone with specific needs, such as those with disabilities.
Evaluating Risks: This involves evaluating the likelihood of a fire starting and the potential consequences. The assessment will consider the effectiveness of existing fire safety measures.
Implementing Control Measures: Based on the findings, appropriate fire safety measures are recommended. This may include installing fire alarms, emergency lighting, fire extinguishers, and ensuring clear escape routes.
Recording Findings and Implementing an Action Plan: The findings of the fire risk assessment must be documented, and an action plan should be put in place to address any identified risks.
Reviewing and Updating: Fire risk assessments should be regularly reviewed and updated, especially if there have been changes to the premises or its use.
Why Choose Incer.co.uk for Your Fire Risk Assessment?
At Fire Risk Assessment we specialize in providing thorough and reliable fire risk assessments tailored to your specific needs. Our experienced assessors are fully qualified and stay up-to-date with the latest fire safety regulations, ensuring that your assessment is comprehensive and compliant.
We take a proactive approach to fire safety, working closely with you to identify risks and develop practical solutions. Our goal is to help you create a safe environment for everyone who enters your premises, giving you confidence that you have taken all necessary steps to prevent fire hazards.
A fire risk assessment is not just a legal requirement; it is a vital part of protecting your business, employees, and customers from the devastating effects of fire. By choosing Incer.co.uk, you can rest assured that your fire risk assessment will be carried out with the utmost professionalism and expertise. Contact us today to learn more about how we can help you ensure the safety and compliance of your premises.
0 notes
Text
Comprehensive Guide to Fire Risk Assessments for Safety Compliance
Fire risk assessments are a critical part of ensuring safety in any environment, be it a workplace, residential building, or public space. By identifying and managing potential fire hazards, these assessments play a vital role in preventing fires and safeguarding lives. This guide explores the importance of fire risk assessments and provides key insights into their implementation.
What is a Fire Risk Assessment?
A fire risk assessment is a systematic process that involves evaluating a property or premises to identify fire hazards and assess the risk level. The process includes:
Identifying Fire Hazards: Sources of ignition, fuel, and oxygen are considered to determine how a fire could start and spread.
Assessing People at Risk: This step identifies occupants who may be vulnerable, such as employees, visitors, or residents.
Evaluating, Reducing, and Controlling Risks: This involves taking measures to minimize or eliminate fire hazards and ensuring safety systems are in place.
Recording Findings and Planning: Documenting the results and creating an action plan for improvements.
Reviewing and Updating Regularly: Fire risk assessments are not a one-time task. They should be regularly updated, especially when changes are made to the property or its use.
Why Are Fire Risk Assessments Important?
Conducting fire risk assessments is not just a best practice but a legal requirement in many jurisdictions. Regular assessments help ensure compliance with fire safety regulations, protecting businesses and property owners from legal liabilities and fines. More importantly, they help save lives by providing a clear strategy for preventing and managing fires.
Who Should Conduct a Fire Risk Assessment?
While small businesses or individual property owners may opt to perform basic assessments themselves, larger or more complex properties often require professional expertise. Certified fire safety assessors are trained to spot hidden risks and provide tailored recommendations. Professionals are also up-to-date with changing fire safety regulations, ensuring compliance.
Key Components of a Fire Risk Assessment
A thorough fire risk assessment should cover the following areas:
Fire Detection and Warning Systems: Are smoke detectors, alarms, and emergency lighting properly installed and functional?
Escape Routes and Exits: Are escape routes clear, accessible, and properly signposted? Do exits lead to safe areas?
Firefighting Equipment: Are fire extinguishers, hoses, and other equipment available and regularly maintained?
Training and Evacuation Plans: Are staff and residents trained on what to do in the event of a fire? Is there a well-practiced evacuation plan in place?
Fire risk assessments are an essential part of maintaining safety in any environment. By identifying potential hazards and implementing measures to control them, you not only ensure regulatory compliance but also create a safer space for everyone. Regular updates and professional guidance are crucial to keeping your fire risk assessment relevant and effective.
For expert assistance and fire safety solutions, visit Safersolutions.ie.
0 notes
Text
Master Your Safety Skills with Our Top-Rated Fire and Safety Course in Chennai
In today's fast-paced industrial world, safety has become more critical than ever. Our comprehensive Fire and Safety Course in Chennai is designed to provide the skills and knowledge necessary to handle emergencies effectively. Whether you're looking to advance your career in safety management or seeking essential training for your organization, this course is your gateway to a safer future.
Why Choose Our Fire and Safety Course in Chennai?
Our program offers a blend of theoretical knowledge and hands-on experience to equip you with the expertise needed to excel in fire and industrial safety. Chennai, a hub of industrial growth, demands skilled professionals who can ensure safety in workplaces. Our course is tailored to meet these demands and offers certifications recognized nationwide.
Key Highlights:
Expert Instructors: Learn from industry experts with years of experience in fire and safety.
Comprehensive Curriculum: Covering all aspects from fire prevention to safety regulations.
Real-World Training: Gain practical experience through simulated scenarios.
Flexible Learning: Weekend and evening batches available for working professionals.
What You Will Learn in the Fire and Safety Course
Our Fire and Safety Course in Chennai covers a wide range of topics that ensure you're fully prepared to handle any safety challenge. Some of the core subjects include:
Fire Prevention and Control Techniques
Understanding fire hazards
Fire extinguishing methods and equipment
Occupational Health and Safety
Industrial safety practices
Ensuring compliance with safety standards
Emergency Response Planning
Evacuation strategies
Crisis management during fire outbreaks
Risk Assessment and Management
Identifying potential safety risks
Implementing effective safety measures
Legal and Regulatory Framework
Understanding national and international safety regulations
Navigating compliance requirements in Chennai’s industrial sector
Who Should Enroll in the Fire and Safety Course in Chennai?
This course is ideal for anyone looking to build a career in safety management, including:
Aspiring safety officers
Industrial workers looking to upgrade their skills
Employers and managers responsible for workplace safety
Students pursuing a career in fire and safety engineering
Career Opportunities After Completing the Fire and Safety Course
Upon completing the Fire and Safety Course in Chennai, you'll be equipped to pursue roles such as:
Fire Safety Officer
Industrial Safety Manager
Risk Assessor
Safety Consultant
With industries in Chennai increasingly prioritizing safety, the demand for trained professionals is at an all-time high. This course offers a stepping stone to a rewarding career in the safety sector.
Conclusion
Investing time in a Fire and Safety Course in Chennai not only enhances personal knowledge but also contributes significantly towards creating safer workplaces and communities. With the right training, individuals can become valuable assets in promoting fire safety awareness and preparedness.
0 notes
Text
NEBOSH IGC in Occupational Health and Safety
The NEBOSH International General Certificate (IGC) in Occupational Health and Safety is a globally recognized qualification designed for individuals working in or aiming to work in health and safety roles across various industries. It provides a strong foundation in the principles of health and safety management, risk assessment, and legal requirements, enabling professionals to manage workplace risks effectively.
Key Features of NEBOSH IGC:
Internationally Recognized Qualification: NEBOSH IGC is one of the most respected certifications for health and safety professionals worldwide. It aligns with international standards such as those set by the International Labour Organization (ILO).
Ideal for Beginners and Experienced Professionals: The course is suitable for those new to health and safety, as well as those with some experience seeking to formalize their knowledge or advance their careers.
Wide Applicability: It covers the essential health and safety principles applicable in a range of industries, including manufacturing, construction, oil and gas, hospitality, and more.
NEBOSH IGC Course Structure:
The course is divided into two main units, each focusing on different aspects of health and safety management:
Unit IG1: Management of Health and Safety
This unit covers the core principles of managing health and safety in a workplace environment.
Elements:
Why we should manage workplace health and safety
How health and safety management systems work and what they look like
Managing risk – understanding people and processes
Health and safety monitoring and measuring
Legal frameworks and health and safety laws (international focus)
Assessment: IG1 is assessed through an open-book examination. In this exam, candidates must demonstrate their knowledge by applying health and safety principles to real-life workplace scenarios.
Unit IG2: Risk Assessment
This unit focuses on identifying and managing workplace hazards.
Elements:
Physical and psychological health hazards (e.g., noise, stress, musculoskeletal injuries)
Musculoskeletal health (manual handling, ergonomic risks)
Chemical and biological agents (control measures for hazardous substances)
Workplace hazards (fire, electrical, machinery, slips, trips, falls)
Transportation hazards (safety in road and transportation)
Assessment: IG2 is assessed through a practical risk assessment project. Candidates must conduct a risk assessment in their own workplace or a simulated environment, demonstrating their ability to identify hazards and recommend control measures.
Course Delivery Options:
NEBOSH IGC can be taken through a variety of learning formats:
Classroom Training: Delivered in-person by accredited NEBOSH learning partners.
Online Learning: Offers flexibility for professionals to study at their own pace.
Blended Learning: Combines online study with classroom workshops.
NEBOSH IGC Exam and Certification:
IG1: Open-book examination based on scenario-based questions, typically followed by a closing interview to verify knowledge.
IG2: A workplace-based risk assessment report that demonstrates practical application of knowledge.
Who Should Take the NEBOSH IGC?
Health and Safety Professionals: Individuals looking to formalize or advance their knowledge in health and safety management.
Managers and Supervisors: Those with health and safety responsibilities in their teams or departments.
Aspiring Safety Officers: Individuals seeking a career as a safety officer or health and safety specialist.
HR and Compliance Managers: Who are responsible for workplace safety policies and procedures.
Anyone Working in High-Risk Industries: Such as construction, manufacturing, oil and gas, or chemical processing.
Benefits of NEBOSH IGC:
Improved Job Prospects: Many employers worldwide look for candidates with NEBOSH IGC certification for roles such as Health and Safety Officer, Safety Advisor, or Risk Assessor.
Legal and Regulatory Knowledge: The course covers important health and safety legislation and provides the knowledge needed to ensure compliance with international safety standards.
Practical Skills Development: The risk assessment project allows candidates to apply their learning to real-life situations, improving their ability to manage workplace risks.
Membership Opportunities: NEBOSH IGC holders are eligible for membership with professional safety bodies such as:
IOSH (Institution of Occupational Safety and Health) at the Technical Member (TechIOSH) level.
IIRSM (International Institute of Risk and Safety Management) at the Associate Member level.
Foundation for Further Study: The IGC serves as a pathway to more advanced qualifications such as the NEBOSH International Diploma, which can lead to senior health and safety roles.
Career Opportunities:
Upon completing the NEBOSH IGC, graduates are equipped to pursue various roles in occupational health and safety, such as:
Health and Safety Officer
Health and Safety Advisor
Safety Coordinator
Risk Assessor
Compliance Officer
Environment, Health, and Safety (EHS) Specialist
Safety Auditor
Safety Manager
Conclusion:
The NEBOSH International General Certificate (IGC) in Occupational Health and Safety is a vital qualification for those looking to build or advance a career in health and safety. It offers a solid foundation in managing workplace risks and ensures that professionals are equipped to create safer working environments globally.
safety course in chennai
safety course in madurai
safety course in ambattur
nebosh course in chennai
nebosh course in madurai
nebosh course in ambattur
#safety institute in chennai#nebosh course in madurai#safety course in ambattur#safety institute in madurai
0 notes