#Europe Natural Gas Generator Market
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Europe Gas Generator Market Growth, Trends, Demand, Industry Share, Challenges, Future Opportunities and Competitive Analysis 2033: SPER Market Research
The Europe Gas Generator Market encompasses the production, distribution, and utilization of gas-powered generators across European countries. With increasing concerns about energy security, environmental sustainability, and power reliability, the demand for gas generators is rising. Key drivers include the transition to cleaner energy sources, infrastructure development, and backup power requirements. Additionally, advancements in gas generator technology, such as improved efficiency and reduced emissions, contribute to market growth. Key players focus on innovation, product differentiation, and service quality to meet the diverse needs of customers and capitalize on market opportunities in Europe.
#Europe Gas Generator Market#Europe Gas Generator Market Challenges#Europe Gas Generator Market Competition#Europe Gas Generator Market Demand#Europe Gas Generator Market Future Outlook#Europe Gas Generator Market Growth#Europe Gas Generator Market Report#Europe Gas Generator Market Revenue#Europe Gas Generator Market Segmentation#Europe Gas Generator Market Share#Europe Gas Generator Market Size#Europe Gas Generator Market Trends#Europe Hydrogen Gas Generator Market#Europe Industrial Gas Generator Market#Europe Laboratory Gas Generators Market#Europe Large Generator Market#Europe Natural Gas Generator Market#Europe Natural Gas Generator Market Forecast#Europe Natural Gas Generator Market Opportunities#Europe Power Generator Market#Europe Residential Gas Generator Market#Gas Generator Market
0 notes
Text
BDS Consumer Boycott Targets
Everything here is copied over from the BDS website.
Hewlett Packard Inc (HP Inc)
HP Inc (US) provides services to the offices of genocide leaders, Israeli PM Netanyahu and Financial Minister Smotrich. HPE, which shares the same brand, provides technology for Israel’s Population and Immigration Authority, a pillar of its apartheid regime.
Chevron (including Caltex and Texaco)
US fossil fuel multinational Chevron is the main corporation extracting gas claimed by apartheid Israel in the East Mediterranean. Chevron generates billions in revenues, strengthening Israel’s war chest and apartheid system, exacerbating the climate crisis and Gaza siege, and is complicit in depriving the Palestinian people of their right to sovereignty over their natural resources. Chevron has thousands of retail gas stations around the world under the Chevron, Caltex, and Texaco brand names.
Siemens
Siemens (Germany) is the main contractor for the Euro-Asia Interconnector, an Israel-EU submarine electricity cable that is planned to connect Israel’s illegal settlements in the occupied Palestinian territory to Europe. Siemens-branded electrical appliances are sold globally.
PUMA
Since 2018, we have called for a boycott of PUMA (Germany) due to its sponsorship of the Israel Football Association (IFA), which governs teams in Israel’s illegal settlements on occupied Palestinian land. In a major BDS win in December 2023, PUMA leaked news to the media that it will not be renewing its IFA contract when it expires in December 2024. Until then, it is still complicit, so we continue to #BoycottPUMA until it finally ends its complicity in apartheid.
Carrefour
Carrefour (France) is a genocide enabler. Carrefour-Israel has supported Israeli soldiers partaking in the unfolding genocide of Palestinians in Gaza with gifts of personal packages. In 2022, it entered a partnership with the Israeli company Electra Consumer Products and its subsidiary Yenot Bitan, both of which are involved in grave violations against the Palestinian people.
AXA
Insurance giant AXA (France) invests in Israeli banks financing war crimes and the theft of Palestinian land and natural resources. When Russia invaded Ukraine, AXA took targeted measures against it. Yet, Axa has taken no action against Israel, a 75-year-old regime of settler-colonialism and apartheid, despite its ongoing genocidal war on Gaza.
SodaStream
SodaStream is an Israeli company that is actively complicit in Israel's policy of displacing the indigenous Bedouin-Palestinian citizens of present-day Israel in the Naqab (Negev) and has a long history of racial discrimination against Palestinian workers.
Ahava
Ahava cosmetics is an Israeli company that has its production site, visitor center, and main store in an illegal Israeli settlement in the occupied Palestinian territory.
RE/MAX
RE/MAX (US) markets and sells property in illegal Israeli settlements built on stolen Palestinian land, thus enabling Israel’s colonization of the occupied West Bank.
Israeli produce in your supermarkets
Boycott produce from Israel in your supermarket and demand their removal from shelves. Beyond being part of a trade that fuels Israel’s apartheid economy, Israeli fruits, vegetables, and wines misleadingly labeled as “Product of Israel” often include products of illegal settlements on stolen Palestinian land. Israeli companies do not distinguish between the two, and neither should consumers.
Non-BDS Grassroots Boycotts:
McDonald’s (US), Burger King (US), Papa John’s (US), Pizza Hut (US), WIX (Israel), etc. are now being targeted in some countries by grassroots organic boycott campaigns, not initiated by the BDS movement. BDS supports these boycott campaigns because these companies, or their branches or franchisees in Israel, have openly supported apartheid Israel and/or provided generous in-kind donations to the Israeli military amid the current genocide. If these grassroots campaigns are not already organically active in your area, we suggest focusing your energies on our strategic campaigns above.
Recently, McDonald’s franchisee in Malaysia has filed a SLAPP lawsuit against solidarity activists, claiming defamation. Instead of holding the Israel franchisee to account for supporting genocide, we are now witnessing corporate bullying against activists. For both these reasons, we are calling to escalate the boycott of McDonald’s until the parent company takes action and ends the complicity of the brand.
Remember, all Israeli banks and virtually all Israeli companies are complicit to some degree in Israel’s system of occupation and apartheid, and hundreds of international corporations and banks are also deeply complicit. We focus our boycotts on a small number of companies and products for maximum impact.
63 notes
·
View notes
Text
i’ve recently come across an insightful video analysis that was reposted on tiktok, explaining the Gaza situation in depth and touching on the geopolitical and economic motivations that background it, along with the potential impact from the ethnic cleansing and the active genocide of Palestinian people by zionists. here’s a summary with some links to more-reputable news articles:
-roughly around a month ago, netanyahu declared his plan for a “new middle east,” an economic corridor stretching from India to the European continent, through the UAE, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and “israel.”
-due to the weakening of the US Dollar, this “new middle east” corridor serves as a hopeful (on their part) counter to China’s new ongoing “silk road.” it’s essentially a move for leverage on world economics, trade, and politics.
-Russia is the country with the largest proven reserves of natural gas. in 2022, Nord Stream 1 and 2 (Russia’s gas pipelines) were both blown up. sanction packages from EU ban Russian gas. no more Russian gas coming into Europe.
-Iran, the country with the second largest gas reserves, signs the Nuclear Deal in 2015-2016. the US backs out of the deal and reimpose harsh sanctions on Iran. Iran is barred from selling its gas and oil to Europe and others.
-with Russia and Iran out of the picture, “israel” (US-backed) proposes itself as a solution to EU’s gas shortages. in 2010, they find the Leviathan—a giant gas field in the middle east (Mediterranean Sea), off the coast of Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria.
-Syria initially declines offers over its gas reserves; the US now controls 1/3 of Syria and all its oil fields, and “israel” regularly bombs it’s most vital port (Latakia). another major port is in Beirut, which mysteriously exploded in 2020. both Syria and Lebanon’s maritime activity are limited, including in trade and gas exploration.
-Gaza, also having its own unexplored gas fields, has been under siege, under naval blockade since 2007. the only working port left in the coast is haifa port in “israel.” “israel” is now the only one able to explore gas and implement an economic corridor, like the proposed “new middle east.” what the US and “israel” have essentially done is killed off the competition, stole their goods, and cornered the market.
-in light of Europe’s gas shortages, to get them gas before winter, “israel” attempts to “stabilize” the region by solving “the Palestinian question”—more than displacement, they’ve resorted to ethnic cleansing and genocide. basically an acceleration of their plan.
-what Palestinian resistance groups have done in response was because they were backed into a corner. tooth and nail, life or death. it did not happen in a vacuum.
it has always been a move for natural resources; Palestine, Syria, Congo—every move for destabilization framed as intervention. it has always been greed for capital.
update:
it’s come to my attention that the video in question might have some more pro-Russian leaning stances, and so i’ve deleted the google drive link to the reposted tiktok and the link to the actual tiktok as i do not wish to platform the denial, partial or in whole, of the atrocities done to Ukrainian people. i will keep the summary up with some parts omitted because i still do think it is an insightful analysis in general and i do think the knowledge is still useful and relevant.
#peace is not the answer; liberation is the answer#resources#palestine#free palestine#free gaza#gaza strip#please look into other resources within the first and second tags in this post too
79 notes
·
View notes
Text
EVERYONE RECALLS THE SHORTAGES of toilet paper and pasta, but the early period of the pandemic was also a time of gluts. With restaurants and school cafeterias shuttered, farmers in Florida destroyed millions of pounds of tomatoes, cabbages, and green beans. After meatpacking plants began closing, farmers in Minnesota and Iowa euthanized hundreds of thousands of hogs to avoid overcrowding. Across the country, from Ohio to California, dairies poured out millions of gallons of milk and poultry farms smashed millions of eggs.
The supply chain disruptions continue. Last year, there was a rice glut, and big box stores like Walmart and Target complained of bloated inventories. There was a natural gas glut in both Europe and in India, as well as a surfeit of semiconductor chips in the tech sector. Florida cabbages, microchips, and Asian rice may not seem like they have much in common, but each of these stories represents a fundamental if disavowed aspect of capitalism: a crisis of overproduction.
All economic systems have problems of scarcity, but only capitalism also has problems of abundance. The reason is simple: the pursuit of profit above all else leads capitalism to produce too much of things that are profitable but socially destructive (oil, private health insurance, Facebook) and not enough of things that are socially beneficial but not privately profitable (low-income housing, public schools, the ecosystem of the Amazon rainforest). For over a century, from the Industrial Revolution through the Great Depression, crises of overproduction were the target of criticism from across the political spectrum—from aristocratic conservatives like Edmund Burke who feared the anarchy of markets was corroding the social order to socialist radicals like Eugene Debs who thought it generated exploitation and poverty.
But the idea of capitalism’s inherent predilection for overproduction has almost completely disappeared from economic discourse today. It seldom appears in the popular press, including in stories about producers destroying surpluses, a problem that is instead explained away by pointing to freak accidents, contingencies, and unforeseen dislocations. To be sure, many gluts of the past few years have been the result of the pandemic and the war in Ukraine. But overproduction preceded 2020 and shows no signs of going away. Revisiting historical arguments about the problem can help us better understand the interlocking crises of supply chain disruption, deliquescent financial markets, and climate change. The history of overproduction and its discontents offers a set of tools and ideas with which to consider whether “market failures” like externalities and inventory surpluses really are exceptions or are intrinsic to commercial society, whether markets ever actually do equilibrate, and whether the drive for growth is possible without continual excess and waste.
20 notes
·
View notes
Text
High river temperatures that look set to restrict power output at two French nuclear plants that use river water to cool reactors may trigger increased fossil fuel-fired power output elsewhere due to Europe's extensive regional power trading. France regularly exports surplus power from its vast non-emitting nuclear fleet to neighbours Germany, Switzerland, Spain and Italy, and also imports power from the United Kingdom, Germany and elsewhere as a central player in one of the world's most active electricity trading markets. However, with French nuclear power set to dip from at least two plants that cool reactors off the unusually warm Rhone river, a key source of clean electricity looks set to be withdrawn from Europe's power grids that may need to be replaced by power generated from natural gas or coal plants elsewhere on the continent.
13 Jul 23
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
Editor's note: This report is the first in a series on “Europe’s energy transition: Balancing the trilemma” produced by the Brookings Institution in partnership with the Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos.
Providing a stable energy supply is often described in terms of a “trilemma”—a balance between supply security, environmental sustainability, and affordability. Of the three pillars of energy supply, security is the easiest to take for granted. Supply seems fine until it isn’t. Security of fossil fuel supply is particularly easy to ignore in countries that are striving to greatly reduce their fossil fuel consumption for climate reasons. The political focus is on building renewable energy and zero-carbon systems, and mitigating the economic, social, and political costs of transition; the thought was that the existing system would take care of itself until it was phased out. This was the case for much of Europe until two years ago.
Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, shocked Europeans into realizing that they could no longer take the security of their fossil fuel supply for granted. The assumption had been that Europe and Russia were locked into a mutually beneficial, secure relationship, since Europe needed gas and Russia had no infrastructure to sell that gas anywhere else. That belief turned out to be wrong.
When the war began, Europe was importing a variety of energy products from Russia, including crude oil and oil products, uranium products, coal, and liquefied natural gas (LNG). But the Kremlin’s sharpest energy weapon was natural gas, delivered by the state-backed gas monopolist Gazprom via pipelines and based on long-term contracts. Europe needs gas for power generation, household heating, and industrial processes.
Before the invasion, more than 40% of Europe’s imported natural gas came from Russia, its single largest supplier, delivered via four main pipelines. Some European countries relied on Russia for more than 80% of their gas supply, including Austria and Latvia. But Germany was by far Russia’s largest gas customer by volume, importing nearly twice the volume of Italy, the next largest customer. “Oil and gas combined account for 60% of primary energy,” wrote the Economist in May 2022, “and Russia has long been the biggest supply of both. On the eve of the war in Ukraine, it provided a third of Germany’s oil, around half its coal imports, and more than half its gas.”
This paper launches a project on European energy security in turbulent times by analyzing the European response to drastically reduced supplies of Russian pipeline gas. Future papers in the series will delve more deeply into specific aspects of European energy security and their policy implications.
Russia’s actions to cut off gas supply to Europe starting in May 2022 were particularly virulent because it was extremely difficult to cope with the loss of such a large volume of gas. Other regional sources of pipeline gas (e.g., from the North Sea) have been declining and key sectors of European industry (e.g., chemicals) depend on gas as their primary energy source. LNG is a potential substitute for pipeline gas, but it requires specialized infrastructure and global LNG markets were already tight, with much of the world’s supply going to Asia.
The story of Europe’s adjustment to its main supplier of natural gas turning off the taps is generally told in heroic terms: with the continent securing new supply, conserving or substituting (often with generous government subsidies for industry and/or consumers) in order to weather the storm, and throwing Russia’s weaponization of gas back in its face through declining revenues. This narrative is not false, and the scale and speed of the response would certainly have been politically unimaginable before the invasion. But the self-congratulatory tale masks the fact that there were substantial regional differences in both energy supply and response to the crisis, which will make it difficult to generate a Europe-wide political response in the future.
Even more importantly, the decoupling is by no means complete. Overall, in 2023, Europe still imported 14.8% of its total gas supply from Russia, with 8.7% arriving via pipelines (25.1 billion cubic meters or bcm) and 6.1% as LNG (17.8 bcm). (For comparison, during the first quarter of 2021, 47% of Europe’s total gas supply came from Russia, 43% via pipeline and 4% as LNG.)This means that the handful of member states that have not been able to or have not chosen to reduce their dependency remain highly vulnerable to Russia’s weaponization of energy imports.
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
ESSEN, Germany (AP) — For most of this century, Germany racked up one economic success after another, dominating global markets for high-end products like luxury cars and industrial machinery, selling so much to the rest of the world that half the economy ran on exports.
Jobs were plentiful, the government's financial coffers grew as other European countries drowned in debt, and books were written about what other countries could learn from Germany.
No longer. Now, Germany is the world’s worst-performing major developed economy, with both the International Monetary Fund and European Union expecting it to shrink this year.
It follows Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the loss of Moscow's cheap natural gas — an unprecedented shock to Germany’s energy-intensive industries, long the manufacturing powerhouse of Europe.
The sudden underperformance by Europe's largest economy has set off a wave of criticism, handwringing and debate about the way forward.
Germany risks “deindustrialization” as high energy costs and government inaction on other chronic problems threaten to send new factories and high-paying jobs elsewhere, said Christian Kullmann, CEO of major German chemical company Evonik Industries AG.
From his 21st-floor office in the west German town of Essen, Kullmann points out the symbols of earlier success across the historic Ruhr Valley industrial region: smokestacks from metal plants, giant heaps of waste from now-shuttered coal mines, a massive BP oil refinery and Evonik's sprawling chemical production facility.
These days, the former mining region, where coal dust once blackened hanging laundry, is a symbol of the energy transition, dotted with wind turbines and green space.
The loss of cheap Russian natural gas needed to power factories “painfully damaged the business model of the German economy,” Kullmann told The Associated Press. “We’re in a situation where we’re being strongly affected — damaged — by external factors.”
After Russia cut off most of its gas to the European Union, spurring an energy crisis in the 27-nation bloc that had sourced 40% of the fuel from Moscow, the German government asked Evonik to keep its 1960s coal-fired power plant running a few months longer.
The company is shifting away from the plant — whose 40-story smokestack fuels production of plastics and other goods — to two gas-fired generators that can later run on hydrogen amid plans to become carbon neutral by 2030.
One hotly debated solution: a government-funded cap on industrial electricity prices to get the economy through the renewable energy transition.
The proposal from Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck of the Greens Party has faced resistance from Chancellor Olaf Scholz, a Social Democrat, and pro-business coalition partner the Free Democrats. Environmentalists say it would only prolong reliance on fossil fuels.
Kullmann is for it: “It was mistaken political decisions that primarily developed and influenced these high energy costs. And it can’t now be that German industry, German workers should be stuck with the bill.”
The price of gas is roughly double what it was in 2021, hurting companies that need it to keep glass or metal red-hot and molten 24 hours a day to make glass, paper and metal coatings used in buildings and cars.
A second blow came as key trade partner China experiences a slowdown after several decades of strong economic growth.
These outside shocks have exposed cracks in Germany's foundation that were ignored during years of success, including lagging use of digital technology in government and business and a lengthy process to get badly needed renewable energy projects approved.
Other dawning realizations: The money that the government readily had on hand came in part because of delays in investing in roads, the rail network and high-speed internet in rural areas. A 2011 decision to shut down Germany's remaining nuclear power plants has been questioned amid worries about electricity prices and shortages. Companies face a severe shortage of skilled labor, with job openings hitting a record of just under 2 million.
And relying on Russia to reliably supply gas through the Nord Stream pipelines under the Baltic Sea — built under former Chancellor Angela Merkel and since shut off and damaged amid the war — was belatedly conceded by the government to have been a mistake.
Now, clean energy projects are slowed by extensive bureaucracy and not-in-my-backyard resistance. Spacing limits from homes keep annual construction of wind turbines in single digits in the southern Bavarian region.
A 10 billion-euro ($10.68 billion) electrical line bringing wind power from the breezier north to industry in the south has faced costly delays from political resistance to unsightly above-ground towers. Burying the line means completion in 2028 instead of 2022.
Massive clean energy subsidies that the Biden administration is offering to companies investing in the U.S. have evoked envy and alarm that Germany is being left behind.
“We’re seeing a worldwide competition by national governments for the most attractive future technologies — attractive meaning the most profitable, the ones that strengthen growth,” Kullmann said.
He cited Evonik’s decision to build a $220 million production facility for lipids — key ingredients in COVID-19 vaccines — in Lafayette, Indiana. Rapid approvals and up to $150 million in U.S. subsidies made a difference after German officials evinced little interest, he said.
“I'd like to see a little more of that pragmatism ... in Brussels and Berlin,” Kullmann said.
In the meantime, energy-intensive companies are looking to cope with the price shock.
Drewsen Spezialpapiere, which makes passport and stamp paper as well as paper straws that don't de-fizz soft drinks, bought three wind turbines near its mill in northern Germany to cover about a quarter of its external electricity demand as it moves away from natural gas.
Specialty glass company Schott AG, which makes products ranging from stovetops to vaccine bottles to the 39-meter (128-foot) mirror for the Extremely Large Telescope astronomical observatory in Chile, has experimented with substituting emissions-free hydrogen for gas at the plant where it produces glass in tanks as hot as 1,700 degrees Celsius.
It worked — but only on a small scale, with hydrogen supplied by truck. Mass quantities of hydrogen produced with renewable electricity and delivered by pipeline would be needed and don't exist yet.
Scholz has called for the energy transition to take on the “Germany tempo,” the same urgency used to set up four floating natural gas terminals in months to replace lost Russian gas. The liquefied natural gas that comes to the terminals by ship from the U.S., Qatar and elsewhere is much more expensive than Russian pipeline supplies, but the effort showed what Germany can do when it has to.
However, squabbling among the coalition government over the energy price cap and a law barring new gas furnaces has exasperated business leaders.
Evonik's Kullmann dismissed a recent package of government proposals, including tax breaks for investment and a law aimed at reducing bureaucracy, as “a Band-Aid.”
Germany grew complacent during a “golden decade” of economic growth in 2010-2020 based on reforms under Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder in 2003-2005 that lowered labor costs and increased competitiveness, says Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg bank.
“The perception of Germany's underlying strength may also have contributed to the misguided decisions to exit nuclear energy, ban fracking for natural gas and bet on ample natural gas supplies from Russia,” he said. “Germany is paying the price for its energy policies.”
Schmieding, who once dubbed Germany “the sick man of Europe” in an influential 1998 analysis, thinks that label would be overdone today, considering its low unemployment and strong government finances. That gives Germany room to act — but also lowers the pressure to make changes.
The most important immediate step, Schmieding said, would be to end uncertainty over energy prices, through a price cap to help not just large companies, but smaller ones as well.
Whatever policies are chosen, “it would already be a great help if the government could agree on them fast so that companies know what they are up to and can plan accordingly instead of delaying investment decisions," he said.
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
Sustainable Power Generation Drives Floating Power Plant Market
Triton Market Research presents the Global Floating Power Plant Market report segmented by capacity (0 MW- 5 MW, 5.1 MW- 20 MW, 20 MW – 100 MW, 100.1 MW – 250 MW, above 250 MW), and source (non-renewable power source, renewable power source), and Regional Outlook (Latin America, Middle East and Africa, North America, Asia-Pacific, Europe).
The report further includes the Market Summary, Industry Outlook, Impact Analysis, Porter's Five Forces Analysis, Market Maturity Analysis, Industry Components, Regulatory Framework, Key Market Strategies, Drivers, Challenges, Opportunities, Analyst Perspective, Competitive Landscape, Research Methodology & Scope, Global Market Size, Forecasts & Analysis (2023-2028).
Triton's report suggests that the global market for floating power plant is set to advance with a CAGR of 10.74% during the forecast period from 2023 to 2028.
Request Free Sample Report:
Floating power plants are innovative power generation units on floating platforms on water bodies. They serve as primary or backup power sources for specified facilities, utilizing renewable energy sources (solar, wind, etc.) and non-renewable (diesel, natural gas, etc.). These plants offer the advantage of mobility, making them ideal for temporary power generation to tackle local energy shortages.
The increasing popularity of offshore wind projects is due to several market factors, such as the growing demand for clean and sustainable energy sources and advances in offshore wind technology. Also, supportive government policies and the urgent need to combat climate change by reducing carbon emissions further elevate the demand for floating power plants.
Furthermore, the popularity of floating power plants based on IC offers opportunities to the floating power plant market. These innovative power generation systems offer flexibility, scalability, and rapid deployment, catering to remote areas and serving as backup solutions in grid instability situations.
However, challenges like technical complexities, high costs associated with logistics and accessibility, and a shortage of skilled workers for solar panel installation limit the floating power plant market's expansion.
Over the forecast period, the Asia-Pacific region is expected to register the fastest growth. A growing population and increasing industrialization fuel growth prospects. The region is home to a rapidly growing population, which in turn drives the need for expanded power generation capacity. Furthermore, Asia-Pacific is experiencing significant economic growth, with many countries emerging as major global players. This economic expansion is accompanied by a surge in industrial activities and the establishment of new manufacturing units, creating a heightened demand for electricity to support these sectors. Floating power plants present a viable solution to meet this demand, especially in areas with limited land availability.
Floating Power Plant AS, Upsolar Group Co Ltd, SeaTwirl AB, Caterpillar Inc, Mitsubishi Corporation, Wartsila Corporation, Siemens AG, MAN Energy Solutions SE, Kyocera Corporation, and Vikram Solar Limited are prominent companies in the floating power plant market.
Due to its complexity, the floating power plant market poses a moderate threat of new entrants. Capital-intensive development and deployment, along with the need for specialized expertise, act as barriers. Additionally, a skilled workforce in offshore engineering and renewable energy is crucial. Nevertheless, government policies supporting renewable energy adoption, such as feed-in tariffs, subsidies, and favorable regulations, are vital in attracting new players by mitigating financial risks and offering long-term incentives.
Contact Us:
Phone: +44 7441 911839
Website: https://www.tritonmarketresearch.com/
#Floating Power Plant Market#Floating Power Plant#energy power & utilities#power industry#triton market research#market research reports
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Induction Motor Market - Forecast(2022 - 2027)
Induction Motor Market Size is forecast to reach $54.2 billion by 2026, at a CAGR of 6.5% during 2021-2026. An induction motor is an AC electric motor in which torque is produced by the reaction between a varying magnetic field generated in the stator and the current induced in the coils of the rotor. It is used in a majority of machinery, as it is more powerful and eco-friendly compared to the conventional motors in the market. North America has significant share in global induction motor market due to a developed usage of an induction motor in the significant industrial manufacturing, aerospace & defense, and automotive companies. In addition to the growing preference for electric vehicles in the U.S. is also stimulating the growth in North America.
Report Coverage
The report: “Induction Motor Market Report– Forecast (2021-2026)”, by IndustryARC covers an in-depth analysis of the following segments of the Induction Motor market
By Rotor Type: Inner Rotor, Outer Rotor
By Type: Single Phase, Three Phase
By Efficiency Class: IE1, IE2, IE3, IE4
By Voltage: Upto 1KV, 1-6.6 KV, Above 6.6KV
By Vertical: Industrial, Commercial, Residential, Agriculture, Automotive and Others
By Geography: North America (U.S, Canada, Mexico), South America(Brazil, Argentina and others), Europe(Germany, UK, France, Italy, Spain, Russia and Others), APAC(China, Japan India, SK, Aus and Others), and RoW (Middle East and Africa)
Request Sample
Key Takeaways
The rising demand for efficient energy usage over concerns of environmental impact of energy generation from conventional sources such as coal and natural gas, is expected to help grow the Induction Motor market in APAC.
The inner rotor segment is growing at a significant CAGR rate of 7.1% in the forecast period. In inner rotor type motors, rotors are positioned at the centre and surrounded by stator winding.
Automotive sector is expected to witness a highest CAGR of 8.9% the forecast period, owing to various factors such as increase in sales of electric vehicles due to rising concerns over greenhouse gases emissions, and favourable government policies in countries such as India, China and so on.
Induction Motor companies are strengthening their position through mergers & acquisitions and continuously investing in research and development (R&D) activities to come up with solutions to cater to the changing requirements of customers.
Induction Motor Market Segment Analysis - By Rotor Type
Three Phase segment is growing at a significant CAGR of 11.1%
in the forecast period. A three phase induction motor is a type of AC induction motors which operates on three phase supply. These three phase induction motors are widely used AC motor to produce mechanical power in industrial applications. Almost 70% of the machinery in industrial applications uses three-phase induction motors, as they are cost-effective, robust, maintenance-free, and can operate in any environmental condition. Moreover, induction motors are the most used in industry since they are rugged, inexpensive, and are maintenance free. In addition they are widely used in the mining metals and cement, automotive, oil and gas, healthcare, manufacturing industries and so on. Increase awareness of environmental protection across industries also contributes to the growth of three phase induction motors, as they have a low emission rate. Moreover, the shift towards industrial automation, coupled with the rising consumer confidence & promising investment plans triggers demand for the three phase induction motor in industrial application. Furthermore, the advent of Industry 4.0 and technological advancements enables a wide adoption base for the three phase induction motors. In 2019, Oriental Motor USA introduced their latest high efficiency three-phase AC induction motors equipped with a terminal box and a high strength right-angle hypoid gearhead, these new three-phase motors have the capacity of two new wattages of 30W and 40W and expands the KIIS Series Standard AC motors product line-up.
Inquiry Before Buying
Induction Motor Market Segment Analysis - By Vertical
Automotive sector is expected to witness a highest CAGR of 8.9% in the forecast period, owing to various factors such as increase in sales of electric vehicles due to rising concerns over greenhouse gases emissions, and favorable government policies in countries such as India, China and so on. In addition, the shift towards industrial automation, coupled with the rising consumer confidence & promising investment plans triggers demand for the induction motor in industrial application. Furthermore, the advent of Industry 4.0 enables a wide adoption base for the induction motors. Moreover, growing number of product launches by major manufacturers will drive the market growth in the forecast period. In September 2019, Motor and drive manufacturer WEG released the M Mining series of slip-ring induction motors which are designed especially for use in the dusty environments of iron ore operations and the cement sector. In July 2019, Ward Leonard launched 2000 HP induction motor WL29BC200 which is designed tote into a package of 15000 HP for the oil and gas industry. In September 2019, Tata Motors launched Tigor EV for private buyers as well as cab aggregators and EESL staff. he Tata Tigor electric uses a 72 V, 3-Phase Induction motor
Induction Motor Market Segment Analysis - By Geography
Induction Motor market in Asia-Pacific region held significant market share of 38.5% in 2020. Increasing compliance for energy efficient motors and rising adoption of motor-driven electric vehicles are the key factors driving market growth. The rising demand for efficient energy usage over concerns of environmental impact of energy generation from conventional sources such as coal and natural gas, is expected to help grow the Induction Motor market. In addition advancements in the agriculture sector and enormous investments in industrialization in countries such as China, India, South Korea, and Australia is driving the market growth. Further, the increasing production and sales of electric vehicles in countries including China and Japan is also analyzed to drive the market growth.
Schedule a Call
Induction Motor Market Drivers
Robust Structure of Motor
The rough physical structure of the motor is predicted to be a major driving factor for the growth of the induction motor market. Induction motor are robust in nature and can be operated in any climatic conditions. Moreover, the absence of slip rings and brushes in the motor induction eliminates the chances of sparks, which makes the operation safe even in the most explosive working conditions. In addition, induction motor is cost effective, highly reliable and the maintenance is very less, which is expected to propel the growth of the induction motor market in the forecast period 2021-2026.
Rise in Production of Electric Vehicles
The electric car market has witnessed rapid evolution with the ongoing developments in automotive sector and favourable government policies and support in terms of subsidies and grants, tax rebates. As induction motors especially three phase are widely used in electric vehicles because of high efficiency, good speed regulation and absence of commutators is analysed to drive the market growth. In addition these motor also serves as an alternative of a permanent magnet in the electric vehicles. Hence rise in production of electric vehicles is analysed to drive the market. In 2019, Ford has invested $1.45 billion in Detroit plants in U.S., to make electric, autonomous and sports utility vehicles, which is mainly aimed to increase the production of the vehicles thereby impacting on the high procurement of the induction motors. In 2019, Toyota announced plans to invest $749M in expanding the U.S. manufacturing facilities to increase the production of the electric and hybrid vehicles. In 2020, General Motors had committed boost its electric vehicle production by investing more than $7 billion. Moreover governments of several countries have been investing heavily for the development of electric vehicles. In 2019 German government has committed to invest more than $3 billion to expand electric car market growth in the region. Hence these investments and developments are analysed to be the key drivers for the growth of the electric vehicle market and thereby the growth of induction motor market during the forecast period 2021-2026.
Buy Now
Induction Motor Market Challenges
Easy availability of low-quality Induction Motors
The market for Induction Motors is highly fragmented, with a significant number of domestic and international manufacturers. Product quality is a primary parameter for differentiation in this market. The organized sector in the market mainly targets industrial buyers and maintains excellent product quality, while the unorganized sector offers low-cost alternatives to tap local markets. Local manufacturers of Induction Motors in most countries target the unorganized sector and compete strongly with the global suppliers in the respective markets. Leading market players are currently exposed to intense competition from such unorganized players supplying inexpensive and low-quality Induction Motors. This acts as a key challenge for the growth of the market.
Induction Motor Market Landscape
Product launches, acquisitions, Partnerships and R&D activities are key strategies adopted by players in the Induction Motor market. Induction Motor top 10 companies include ABB Ltd. AMETEK, Inc., Johnson Electric Holdings Limited, Siemens AG, Rockwell Automation, Toshiba Corp., Hitachi Ltd., Nidec Corporation, ARC Systems Inc., among others.
Acquisitions/Product Launches
In 2021 BorgWarner launched HVH 320 Induction Motors in four variants. They are offered to light-duty passenger cars and heavy-duty commercial vehicles.
In 2020, ABB has launched new range of low voltage IEC induction motors, which are compactly designed and reduces the overall size of the equipment by minimizing space and total cost of ownership.
For more Electronics related reports, please click here
#induction motor Market#induction motor Market Size#electric motor#induction motor Market Share#induction motor Market Analysis#electromagnetic induction#induction motor Market Revenue#asynchronous motor#induction motor Market Trends#induction motor Market Growth#induction motor Market Research#induction motor Market Outlook#induction motor Market Forecast#induction motor Market Price
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Okay, I have kind of a nagging comment about the first one about Shell.
Shell is a big, multinational company, and it exists only because there are so many people who want to buy petroleum — particularly gasoline. If the demand for gas went away, Shell would do the same. It makes more sense, then, to consider how much Shell (and other gas companies) increase the share of emissions per average customer than it does to talk about the aggregate — the bigger a given gas company gets, the more emissions it will have, and they’re mostly so huge that the numbers are naturally going to be gigantic.
Now, this is actually a very messy calculation to make without doing a lot more research work than I am willing to put in, so please understand up-front that although I’ve looked up some numbers, all of which turned out to be from Statista.com, there are a lot of assumptions being made here which might be false. Without thinking too hard about it for more subtle potential nitpicks, I’m assuming that:
the number of people who buy gasoline in the US is approximately the number of vehicles in the US (that is, there may be households with multiple cars, but households with multiple cars generally have one gas-buyer per vehicle; the number of individuals who personally own multiple vehicles is small) — or, in other words, the number of gas buyers is approximately the number of vehicles
it is reasonable to equate market share of gas sales in the US directly to percentage of gas buyers in the US
the amount of profit per gas buyer in the US is equivalent to the amount of profit per gas buyer in the rest of the world
the “77 million years” figure is based on the global average, not the US average, since Shell is a multinational company
the “77 million years” figure is not already calculated into the average customer’s carbon emissions as quoted (I’ve always kind of wondered about that — the carbon footprint calculators I’ve seen always ask about your gas and manufactured goods consumption, which would mean that those carbon footprint quotations assume corporate emissions are effectively 0 because business emissions are all rolled into the figures for their customers. But we’ll assume here that this is not the case.)
In the last decade Shell actually usually made more profit in both Asia and Europe, separately, than in the Americas. (The overwhelming majority of its profit in the Americas is from the US, but even adding in the rest they still usually get more from Asia and Europe — and even in years where the Americas aren’t in third place, they still don’t go far above a third of the total). Let’s simplify and say that the Americas make up a third of their profits and the US is 30%. (These are both overestimates, meaning they will tend to reduce the estimated number of customers.)
Shell had, in 2019, a 12.5% share of gas sales in the US. (No need to round or anything, that’s directly the number Statista.com said.)
In 2019, there were over 276 million registered vehicles in the US; we’ll round down to 250 million to account for public vehicles — there are buses in the US — and those people who personally own multiple vehicles.
So, out of an estimated 250 million gasoline buyers in the US in 2019, Shell had a 12.5% share, which is 31.25 million; call it 30 million. We are explicitly assuming that Shell makes the same profit per customer everywhere in the world and the US generally makes up 30% of its profits, so each percentage of its profit is 1 million people, and therefore worldwide it has 100 million customers. (I swear I didn’t pick any of the rounded values with this in mind in advance — the numbers just worked out that way.) (I suspect that this number is far too low, but it’s a loose estimate to demonstrate my point so that isn’t really all that important.)
Now, if Shell is generating enough emissions that an average person would have to live 77 million years, but it has 100 million customers, then from another perspective it is raising the emissions of its customers by slightly over ¾ — if the average person is personally responsible for annual carbon emissions of 4 tons (the global average; much higher for developed nations), then by being a Shell customer, they cause an additional 3 tons of emissions for which they are not considered personally responsible. That’s pretty terrible, but I’m not 100% convinced that it is possible to have fossil fuel usage without figures that are just as appalling — in which case the problem isn’t that Shell is specifically Shell, it’s that gas companies exist at all. It would be interesting to patch up the estimated value above to correct for the assumptions and get more accurate values, and then to do the calculations for other gas companies and see whether Shell really is more egregious than the others; if that were the case, it would immediately justify worldwide consumer boycotts — you could immediately lower your carbon footprint, without even cutting your gas consumption, by simply not using Shell gas.
(If the average emissions figure per person includes all the emissions from consumerism, as I mentioned that carbon footprint calculators tend to do, then it means — with this estimate, at least — that ¾ of the average Shell customer’s annual emissions are purely from their gas purchases from Shell, and that’s even more appalling!)
feel free to share the truth...
22K notes
·
View notes
Text
Europe Data Center Generator Market Landscape 2024-2029
The Europe data center generator market by investment is expected to grow at a CAGR of 8.33% from 2023 to 2029.
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Data centers in the Europe data center generator market are increasingly turning to Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) as a cleaner alternative to diesel for backup power. Notable examples include Green Mountain's 14 MW facility in the UK and AWS's Dublin and Sweden data centers, which began transitioning to HVO in 2023. This shift aligns with the industry's drive toward net-zero emissions.
New policies like the UK's Low Carbon Hydrogen Standard, introduced in 2023, are prompting data centers to adopt greener technologies. These regulations are influencing operational strategies, with more operators exploring hydrogen and renewable-based solutions to meet evolving emissions standards across Europe.
The EU Green Deal and local emission regulations are pushing data centers to invest in low-carbon backup generators. For example, Luxembourg's data center, acquired by Arcus Infrastructure Partners in December 2023, was designed with HVO-powered generators to comply with energy efficiency standards, aligning with the EU's 2050 climate neutrality goals.
SEGMENTATION INSIGHTS
Diesel remains the most common generator type for backup in the Europe data center generator market, with continued widespread use in 2023. For example, Equinix’s BX1 Bordeaux facility employs multiple diesel generators.
Fuel cells are currently being tested and implemented in various data centers as part of a shift towards more sustainable energy solutions. For instance, in 2023, NorthC installed Europe’s first green hydrogen-powered emergency backup system at its Groningen facility, while Microsoft is actively testing hydrogen fuel cells in its Dublin data centers, aiming to replace traditional generators.
Segmentation by System Capacity
0–1.5 MW
1.5–3 MW
>=3 MW
Segmentation by System
DRUPS Systems
Diesel, Gas & Bi-fuel Generators
HVO Fuel
Fuel Cells
Segmentation by Tier Standard
Tier I & II
Tier III
Tier IV
REGIONAL ANALYSIS
Western Europe has been at the forefront of the transition toward sustainable data center operations in the Europe data center generator market. Countries like the United Kingdom, Germany, and France are leading the charge by introducing stricter environmental regulations, incentivizing the use of renewable fuels such as Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO), and pushing for carbon neutrality. Notable advancements include the integration of HVO-powered generators in large-scale facilities, such as AWS's Dublin and Sweden data centers and Green Mountain's new 14 MW facility in Romford, UK. The growing adoption of biofuels is driven by policies such as the EU Green Deal and national regulations like Germany's 2024 energy transition plan, which incentivize the replacement of diesel generators with hydrogen and battery storage systems.
While the Nordics have a highly reliable electricity grid, primarily powered by renewables, this poses a challenge for the traditional data center generator market. The reliance on hydropower and wind energy significantly reduces the need for diesel or gas generators. Many data centers are opting for renewable energy-based backup systems or exploring advanced energy storage solutions like battery backups. The push for microgrid systems, which utilize renewables and can operate independently from the main grid, is also gaining traction.
Central and Eastern Europe, particularly Russia and Poland, are highly sensitive to geopolitical risks, which have heightened the need for energy security. The region has experienced disruptions in energy supply due to political tensions and conflicts, making reliable backup power systems critical for data center operations. This has resulted in a surge in demand for diesel and natural gas-powered generators to ensure continuous uptime during grid failures and supports the Europe data center generator market growth.
Segmentation by Geography
Western Europe
The U.K.
Germany
France
Netherlands
Ireland
Switzerland
Italy
Spain
Belgium
Other Western European Countries
Nordics
Sweden
Denmark
Norway
Finland & Iceland
Central & Eastern Europe
Russia
Poland
Other Central & Eastern Europe
VENDOR LANDSCAPE
Major operators are collaborating with energy firms to integrate biofuels into their backup power systems. In January 2023, Digital Realty partnered with Repsol in Spain to use biofuel for backup generators. This is part of a larger industry effort to reduce environmental impact and move away from traditional diesel, supported by initiatives like Kohler's HVO-powered factory in France.
Data centers are increasingly adopting automation and remote monitoring technologies to enhance operational efficiency and sustainability. Equinix, for instance, integrated Machine Learning (ML) into its data centers in 2023 to monitor power systems and generators. AI and robotic systems are expected to continue transforming data center operations, reducing manual oversight.
With rising digitalization and energy demands, European data centers are experiencing more power outages. For example, Microsoft's data center in the Netherlands faced an outage in October 2023 during a switch from grid power to backup generators.
Key Vendor Profiles
ABB
Caterpillar
Cummins
Generac Power Systems
HITEC Power Protection
KOHLER
Rolls-Royce
Yanmar (HIMOINSA)
Other Prominent Vendors
Atlas Copco
Ausonia
Enrogen
FG Wilson
Perkins Engines
PRAMAC
HITZINGER Electric Power
INMESOL
Vital Power
Sustainable Generator Providers
Genesal Energy
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Mainspring
INNIO
Aggreko
Aksa Power Generation
JCB
KEY QUESTIONS ANSWERED:
1. How big is the Europe data center generator market?
2. What is the growth rate of the Europe data center generator market?
3. How much MW of power capacity is expected to reach the Europe data center generator market by 2029?
Author Bio:
Chris McDonald is the Manager at Complete Connection, where he leads the development of cutting-edge solutions in web application development and emerging technologies like Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces (RIS). He regularly writes about advancements in technology and how they can transform industries. If you’re interested in contributing your insights, visit our Write for Us Technology page to learn more about submitting guest articles on the latest in web development and tech innovations.
0 notes
Text
Distributed Solar Power Generation Market Insights and Projections for Future Growth 2024 - 2032
The distributed solar power generation market is transforming the energy landscape by enabling localized power production through solar technologies. This shift not only enhances energy security but also promotes sustainability and environmental stewardship. This article delves into the dynamics of the distributed solar power generation market, exploring key drivers, challenges, market segmentation, regional insights, and future trends.
Understanding Distributed Solar Power Generation
Distributed solar power generation refers to the production of solar energy at or near the point of consumption. Unlike traditional large-scale solar farms, distributed generation systems can be installed on residential rooftops, commercial buildings, and small-scale community projects.
Key Features of Distributed Solar Power Systems
Decentralized Energy Production: These systems generate electricity closer to the point of use, reducing transmission losses and increasing energy efficiency.
Scalability: Distributed solar systems can be installed in various sizes, from small residential units to larger commercial setups, allowing for flexible energy solutions.
Grid Resilience: By decentralizing power generation, distributed solar enhances grid reliability and resilience against outages.
Market Dynamics
Growth Drivers
Increasing Energy Demand
The global demand for energy continues to rise, driven by population growth and urbanization. Distributed solar power generation offers a sustainable solution to meet this growing demand while reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
Advancements in Technology
Innovations in solar technology, including improved efficiency of solar panels and energy storage solutions, are making distributed solar power systems more accessible and economically viable for consumers and businesses.
Supportive Government Policies
Many governments worldwide are implementing policies and incentives to promote renewable energy adoption. These include tax credits, rebates, and net metering schemes, which encourage the installation of distributed solar systems.
Challenges
High Initial Investment
Despite the long-term savings associated with distributed solar power, the initial capital investment required for installation can be a barrier for many consumers, particularly in low-income communities.
Regulatory Hurdles
The distributed solar market often faces regulatory challenges, including complex permitting processes and interconnection standards, which can hinder deployment and growth.
Competition from Other Energy Sources
The increasing availability and decreasing costs of alternative energy sources, such as wind and natural gas, can create competition for distributed solar power generation.
Market Segmentation
By Technology
Photovoltaic (PV) Systems: These systems convert sunlight directly into electricity using solar panels and are the most common form of distributed solar power generation.
Concentrated Solar Power (CSP): CSP systems use mirrors or lenses to focus sunlight onto a small area, generating heat that can be converted into electricity. While less common in distributed applications, CSP can be used in larger-scale installations.
By Application
Residential: Homeowners install distributed solar systems primarily for self-consumption and to reduce electricity bills.
Commercial: Businesses leverage distributed solar power to lower operational costs and enhance sustainability initiatives.
Community Solar Projects: These initiatives allow multiple consumers to share the benefits of a single solar installation, promoting broader access to solar energy.
By Region
North America: The North American market, particularly in the United States, is driven by strong residential and commercial demand for solar power, supported by favorable policies.
Europe: European countries are leading in distributed solar adoption, fueled by aggressive renewable energy targets and a strong commitment to sustainability.
Asia-Pacific: The Asia-Pacific region is witnessing rapid growth in distributed solar generation, particularly in countries like China and India, where energy demand is surging.
Latin America: Countries in Latin America are increasingly adopting distributed solar solutions, driven by both economic and environmental factors.
Middle East & Africa: The region is beginning to embrace distributed solar technologies, with a focus on improving energy access and sustainability.
Regional Insights
North America
The North American distributed solar power generation market is characterized by significant investments in residential solar systems. California, in particular, leads the way with ambitious renewable energy goals and incentives that encourage solar adoption.
Europe
Europe's distributed solar market is thriving, with countries like Germany and Spain pioneering solar initiatives. Strong policy frameworks and public awareness campaigns are contributing to widespread adoption of residential and commercial solar systems.
Asia-Pacific
The Asia-Pacific region is experiencing the fastest growth in the distributed solar power generation market. China is the global leader in solar installations, while India is rapidly expanding its solar capacity to meet growing energy demands.
Latin America
Latin America is emerging as a promising market for distributed solar power, with countries like Brazil and Chile investing in solar technologies to enhance energy security and promote sustainability.
Middle East & Africa
In the Middle East and Africa, distributed solar generation is gaining traction as a solution to energy access challenges. Countries like South Africa are investing in solar initiatives to improve electricity access in remote areas.
Future Trends
Increased Integration of Energy Storage
The integration of energy storage systems with distributed solar power generation is expected to enhance reliability and efficiency. Energy storage allows consumers to store excess energy generated during the day for use during peak demand periods.
Smart Grids and IoT Integration
The rise of smart grid technologies and the Internet of Things (IoT) will facilitate better energy management and monitoring, optimizing the performance of distributed solar systems and enhancing grid resilience.
Focus on Sustainability and Decarbonization
As governments and businesses prioritize sustainability, the distributed solar power generation market will continue to expand. Consumers are increasingly seeking renewable energy solutions that align with their environmental goals.
Conclusion
The distributed solar power generation market is set for significant growth as the world transitions toward sustainable energy solutions. Driven by increasing energy demand, technological advancements, and supportive government policies, distributed solar systems are becoming an integral part of modern energy strategies. While challenges such as high initial investments and regulatory hurdles exist, the future looks promising with advancements in energy storage, smart grid technologies, and a strong focus on sustainability. As the energy landscape evolves, distributed solar power generation will play a crucial role in achieving global energy goals and fostering a sustainable future.
More Trending Reports
Waste Heat Recovery System Market Growth
Industrial Filtration Market Growth
Utility Asset Management Market Growth
Reciprocating Compressor Market Growth
0 notes
Text
Industrial Waste Water Treatment Chemicals Market — Forecast(2024–2030)
Overview
With rise in the growing consumption for industrial waste water treatment chemicals is increasing due to increase in population, rapid urbanization and fresh water shortage, due to this the Industrial Waste Water Treatment Chemicals market is expected to grow in the forecast period. Growing governments implementation towards industrial waste water treatment will further enhance the overall market demand for Industrial Waste Water Treatment Chemicals during the forecast period.
Report Coverage
The report: “Industrial Waste Water Treatment Chemicals Market — Forecast (2020–2025)”, by IndustryARC, covers an in-depth analysis of the following segments of the Industrial Waste Water Treatment Chemicals industry.
By Type of Chemicals — Scale Inhibitors, Corrosion Inhibitors, Defoamer, Biocides, Organic Polymers, Oxygen Scavengers, Coagulants, Others.
By Geography — North America, South America, Europe, APAC, RoW.
Key Takeaways
Asia-Pacific dominates the Industrial Waste Water Treatment Chemicals market owing to larger water demand due to larger population.
Increasing water pollution and scarcity of water are major factors driving the waste water treatment services market.
Due to the covid 19 pandemic, the residential usage of water has increased due to which the Industrial waste water treatment chemicals market is growing.
One notable challenge for Industrial waste water treatment chemicals is that, it is considerably costly to set up.
Request Sample
Type of Chemicals — Segment Analysis
Organic Polymers segment holds the largest share in the Industrial Waste Water Treatment Chemicals market. Organic polymers consist of polyacrylamide, polyaluminium chloride among others. Organic polymers are used to purify low quality water either for drinking or industrial purposes. These are used in industrial waste water treatment process to inhibit the growth of harmful organisms and also to kill the existing ones. The efficiency of the industrial waste water treatment chemicals depends on dosage rate and duration of the additive’s presence in water. Industrial waste water treatment facilities are growing at a faster pace due to excess generation of wastewater from industrial sector. The soda ash industry is a part of the chemical industry, which is responsible for the production of sodium carbonate, calcium chloride, absorbent masses, evaporated wet salt, food salt, pickling salt or salt tablets. During manufacturing of those products, strongly alkaline wastewater is generated. Owing to this the Industrial Waste Water Treatment Chemicals market is growing.
Geography — Segment Analysis
APAC has dominated the Industrial Waste Water Treatment Chemicals market with a share of more than xx%, owing to high demand from the end-user industries, such as power, steel, and food & beverage. Countries such as India, China, Japan are the epicentre for the Industrial Waste Water Treatment Chemicals market, as these countries consist of large number of industries. The wastewaters from large-scale industries such as oil refineries, petrochemical plants, chemical plants, and natural gas processing plants commonly contain gross amounts of oil and suspended solids. Those industries use a device known as an API oil-water separator which is designed to separate the oil and suspended solids from their wastewater effluents.
Industrial Waste Water Treatment Chemicals Market Drivers
Implementation of Stringent Government regulations
Implementation of Stringent Governments’ regulations and efforts to reuse water and wastewater treatment in industries, will further aid the market growth of Industrial Waste Water Treatment Chemicals market. The removal of impurities from wastewater, or sewage, before they reach aquifers or natural bodies of water such as rivers, lakes, estuaries, and oceans. Since pure water is not found in nature (i.e., outside chemical laboratories), any distinction between clean water and polluted water depends on the type and concentration of impurities found in the water as well as on its intended use.
Increasing demand for clean water
As demand for water increases across the globe, the availability of fresh water in many regions is likely to decrease because of climate change, as warns by latest edition of the United Nations’ World Water Development Report (WWDR4). It predicts that these pressures will exacerbate economic disparities between certain countries, as well as between sectors or regions within countries. So, the demand for fresh and clean water are increasing due to which the Industrial waste water treatment chemicals market will grow.
Industrial Waste Water Treatment Chemicals Market Challenges
Costly setting up of Equipment.
In manufacturing, setup cost is the cost incurred to get equipment ready to process a different batch of goods. Hence, setup cost is regarded as a batch-level cost in activity-based costing. Setup cost is considered to be a non-value-added cost that should be minimized. One notable hurdle of cooling water treatment chemicals market is that, it is considerably costly to set up. So, small industries are financially not that much strong to setup these equipments. So, they look to escape the installing of these equipments. Whereas Antifoams are chemical agents designed to control the wasteful formation of foam during industrial processes.
Inquiry Before Buying
Impact of COVID-19
The rapid spread of coronavirus has had a major impact on global markets as, major economies of the world are completely lockdown due to this pandemic. Because of this major lockdown, suddenly all the consumer market has started to show zero interest towards purchasing equipments regarding the IWTC. One of the major difficulties, market is facing are the shutdown of all kinds of International transportation. Global crisis for all sectors including manufacturing sector have slower down the demand of goods’ production and exports of effect pigments market.
Buy Now
Market Landscape
Technology launches, acquisitions and R&D activities are key strategies adopted by players in the Industrial Waste Water Treatment Chemicals market. In 2019, the market of Industrial Waste Water Treatment Chemicals has been consolidated by the top five players accounting for xx% of the share. Major players in the Industrial Waste Water Treatment Chemicals Market are Akzo Nobel N.V., Angus Chemical Company, BASF SE, BWA Water Additives UK Ltd., Kemira OYJ, The Lubrizol Corporation, Tiarco Chemical, Shandong Taihe Water Treatment Co., Ltd, Kurita Water Industries Ltd, among others.
0 notes
Text
Small Modular Reactor Market Analysis: Trends and Growth Projections for 2024-2031
The Small Modular Reactor Market size was valued at USD 5.75 billion in 2023 and is expected to grow to USD 7.37 billion by 2032 and grow at a CAGR of 2.8% over the forecast period of 2024–2032.
Market Overview
Small Modular Reactors are nuclear fission reactors that are designed to be built in factories and shipped to sites for assembly. These reactors typically produce up to 300 megawatts (MW) of electricity, significantly less than conventional nuclear power plants, which can generate over 1,000 MW. The modular nature of SMRs allows for incremental capacity additions, reducing the financial risks associated with large-scale nuclear projects.
Recent technological advancements have enhanced the safety and efficiency of SMRs, making them an attractive option for both developed and developing nations. Additionally, the push for decarbonization and energy independence is driving increased investments in SMR technology.
Request Sample Report@ https://www.snsinsider.com/sample-request/2874
Key Market Drivers
Rising Demand for Clean Energy: The global shift towards sustainable energy sources to combat climate change is driving interest in SMRs as a low-carbon alternative.
Government Support and Funding: Numerous governments are implementing policies and providing financial support to promote nuclear energy development, including SMR projects.
Technological Advancements: Innovations in nuclear technology, including improved safety features and efficiency, are making SMRs more appealing to investors and operators.
Energy Security and Independence: SMRs can help countries diversify their energy mix and reduce dependence on fossil fuels, enhancing energy security.
Application in Remote Areas: The ability to deploy SMRs in remote or underserved regions makes them a viable solution for providing reliable electricity to off-grid communities.
Market Segmentation
The Small Modular Reactor Market can be segmented by type, application, end-user, and region.
By Type
Light Water Reactors (LWR): These are the most common type of SMR and use ordinary water as both a coolant and a neutron moderator.
High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors (HTGR): Utilizing helium as a coolant and graphite as a moderator, these reactors operate at higher temperatures, making them suitable for hydrogen production and other applications.
Molten Salt Reactors: This innovative design uses molten salt as both a coolant and a fuel, offering enhanced safety and efficiency.
Other Types: Includes designs like Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactors and other advanced nuclear technologies.
By Application
Electricity Generation: The primary application of SMRs is to generate electricity for national grids, providing a reliable source of power.
Industrial Applications: SMRs can be used for industrial heat applications, including processes that require high-temperature heat.
Desalination: SMRs can also be employed in desalination plants to provide freshwater in water-scarce regions.
Hydrogen Production: SMRs have the potential to produce hydrogen through high-temperature electrolysis, supporting the transition to a hydrogen economy.
Regional Analysis
North America: The largest market for SMRs, led by the United States and Canada, where numerous projects and initiatives are underway to advance SMR technology.
Europe: Countries like the UK, France, and Finland are investing in SMR development as part of their strategies to achieve carbon neutrality.
Asia-Pacific: Rapid industrialization and increasing energy demands in countries like China, India, and South Korea are driving interest in SMR projects.
Latin America: Growing interest in nuclear energy as a means to achieve energy security and sustainability is leading to discussions on SMR deployment in countries like Brazil and Argentina.
Middle East & Africa: Countries in this region are exploring SMRs as part of their efforts to diversify energy sources and reduce carbon footprints.
Current Market Trends
Collaborative Development Efforts: Increased collaboration between governments, research institutions, and private companies is fostering innovation and accelerating the development of SMRs.
Focus on Safety and Security: Enhanced safety features and security measures are being prioritized in SMR designs to address public concerns and regulatory requirements.
Cost Reduction Initiatives: Efforts to reduce the costs associated with SMR construction and operation are being prioritized to enhance the economic feasibility of these projects.
Public Acceptance and Awareness: Growing public awareness of the benefits of nuclear energy, including SMRs, is crucial for increasing acceptance and support for new projects.
Integration with Renewable Energy: SMRs are being considered as complementary solutions to renewable energy sources, providing reliable baseload power to support intermittent renewables like solar and wind.
Buy a Complete Report of Small Modular Reactor Market 2024–2031@ https://www.snsinsider.com/checkout/2874
Conclusion
The Small Modular Reactor Market is poised for significant growth through 2031, driven by rising energy demand, technological advancements, and supportive government policies. As the world transitions to sustainable energy sources, SMRs offer a compelling solution for providing reliable and low-carbon electricity.
About Us:
SNS Insider is a global leader in market research and consulting, shaping the future of the industry. Our mission is to empower clients with the insights they need to thrive in dynamic environments. Utilizing advanced methodologies such as surveys, video interviews, and focus groups, we provide up-to-date, accurate market intelligence and consumer insights, ensuring you make confident, informed decisions. Contact Us: Akash Anand — Head of Business Development & Strategy [email protected] Phone: +1–415–230–0044 (US) | +91–7798602273 (IND)
0 notes
Text
Investment Opportunities in the Growing Flow Meter Market
The global flow meter market was valued at approximately USD 10.02 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.5% from 2024 to 2030. In 2020, the market shipment size reached about 5,378,749 units. A key driver of market growth during the forecast period is the increasing demand for flow rate measurement in oil and gas (O&G) management applications worldwide. Additionally, there is expected to be significant adoption of measurement technologies and instruments across various sectors, including water and wastewater management, power generation, and the pulp and paper industry. The O&G, chemical, and petroleum refinery sectors are particularly poised for substantial growth, largely due to the recent discoveries of shale gas reserves in regions such as North America, Europe, and the Asia Pacific.
The demand for intelligent flow measurement systems is anticipated to rise, especially as the integration of the Internet of Things (IoT) fosters the development of smart measurement solutions. Specifically, the demand for Coriolis flowmeters is expected to increase because of their enhanced capabilities for accurately measuring flow rates. Market players are primarily focusing on the O&G sector and are making significant investments to deliver innovative products and solutions for measuring the flow of liquids, gases, and vapors. Custody transfer applications in the oil and gas industry present lucrative opportunities for ultrasonic and Coriolis flowmeters, further driving market growth.
Technological advancements such as wireless monitoring and control, sophisticated sensors, and digital readouts are also expected to propel market growth during the forecast period. Manufacturers are increasingly incorporating IoT sensors into their products to create smart metering solutions. This IoT approach facilitates automatic meter reading, allowing for the automatic and remote collection of data. Given these technological innovations, the market is poised for substantial growth from 2024 to 2030. However, one challenge that may hinder market growth is the time-consuming nature of product calibration.
Gather more insights about the market drivers, restrains and growth of the Flow Meter Market
Market Concentration and Characteristics
The flow meter market is currently in a high growth stage, with the rate of market expansion accelerating. Key players in this market typically include established companies with extensive product portfolios, strong brand recognition, and a broad geographic footprint. Although numerous manufacturers and suppliers operate within the flow meter market, a select group of major players tends to dominate due to competitive advantages such as technological expertise, diversified product offerings, and established customer relationships.
Furthermore, the flow meter market is characterized by a significant level of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) activity among leading players. This trend is driven by several factors, including the pursuit of increased market share and the necessity to consolidate within a rapidly growing market landscape.
While flow meters are widely utilized for measuring fluid flow rates across various industries, there are alternative solutions that can fulfill similar roles in specific applications. One notable alternative is the use of ultrasonic sensors, which measure flow velocity by utilizing sound waves. These sensors can be non-invasive, making them advantageous for applications where direct contact with the fluid is either undesirable or impractical.
Market concentration is an important aspect of the flow meter market. Although a diverse array of companies operates globally in this field, there is a significant presence of smaller and regional players catering to niche segments or specific industries. This diversity contributes to competition and enriches the overall market landscape. Overall, while market concentration may vary across different regions and industry segments, the flow meter market remains dynamic and competitive, driven by ongoing innovations, regulatory requirements, and the evolving needs of customers.
Order a free sample PDF of the Flow Meter Market Intelligence Study, published by Grand View Research.
0 notes
Text
The Di Methyl Ether (DME) market is projected to grow significantly, with a market size of USD 10,225 million in 2024, and it is expected to reach USD 19,929.64 million by 2032, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.7%. Dimethyl Ether (DME) has gained traction across various industries due to its versatility as a cleaner and more efficient fuel source. DME, a colorless gas with chemical properties that resemble those of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), has garnered attention as a sustainable alternative in the fuel and chemical industries. Its applications span from use as a propellant in aerosols to a diesel substitute, driving the demand for DME and fostering market growth. This article delves into the trends, growth drivers, challenges, and future prospects for the DME market.
Browse the full report https://www.credenceresearch.com/report/di-methyl-ether-market
Overview of Dimethyl Ether (DME) Market
The global DME market has been growing steadily and is expected to continue its upward trend. DME's growing adoption as an alternative fuel source is primarily driven by environmental concerns and government initiatives to reduce carbon emissions. The market value of DME is projected to witness substantial growth due to rising demand across various sectors, including transportation, power generation, and domestic fuel. According to recent estimates, the DME market size is anticipated to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 10% during the next decade, reaching a multi-billion dollar valuation by the end of the forecast period.
Key Growth Drivers
1. Demand for Clean and Sustainable Fuels
With increased awareness about climate change and the environmental impacts of traditional fossil fuels, industries worldwide are seeking cleaner alternatives. DME, a non-toxic and environmentally friendly fuel, produces no particulate matter when burned, making it an ideal choice for eco-conscious sectors. Its combustion process results in fewer greenhouse gas emissions compared to diesel and gasoline, positioning it as a valuable substitute in the fuel industry.
2. Growing Applications in Transportation
One of the most promising applications of DME is as an alternative fuel for transportation. When used in modified diesel engines, DME exhibits combustion characteristics similar to those of diesel, with added benefits of lower emissions. The transportation sector, facing increasing pressure to reduce its carbon footprint, is embracing DME as a sustainable option, particularly for commercial vehicles. Major automotive companies are actively investing in the research and development of DME-powered engines, which is expected to drive market growth in the coming years.
3. Supportive Government Policies and Incentives
Governments worldwide are promoting alternative fuels to reduce carbon emissions and achieve their respective climate goals. Many countries, especially in Europe and Asia-Pacific, have introduced subsidies, tax incentives, and funding programs to support the adoption of cleaner fuels. In China, for instance, the government is investing in DME production as part of its strategy to transition towards greener fuels. Such policies are accelerating DME market expansion and encouraging more industries to adopt this sustainable fuel source.
4. Advancements in Production Technologies
DME is primarily produced from methanol, which can be derived from natural gas, biomass, or coal. Recent advancements in production technologies have enabled manufacturers to produce DME more efficiently and at a lower cost. Emerging production processes, such as gasification of biomass and direct synthesis from syngas, are also helping to broaden the resource base for DME production. These technological innovations make DME a more feasible alternative fuel for a variety of industries and end-users.
Challenges Facing the DME Market
While the prospects for DME are promising, the market faces several challenges that may hinder its growth.
1. High Production Costs
Despite technological advances, the cost of producing DME remains higher than that of conventional fuels, making it less attractive for industries with tight budget constraints. The production process is energy-intensive, and fluctuations in the price of raw materials like methanol also impact the overall cost, which may limit widespread adoption in certain regions.
2. Infrastructure Limitations
The DME market faces infrastructure-related challenges, particularly in storage and distribution. Unlike LPG, DME requires specific handling and storage facilities due to its physical properties. Most existing fueling stations are not equipped to handle DME, which necessitates significant investment to build new infrastructure or retrofit existing ones. This limitation could slow down the growth of the DME market in regions where LPG infrastructure dominates.
3. Market Awareness and Acceptance
Although the benefits of DME are well-documented, awareness among end-users remains limited, especially in developing economies. Many consumers and industries are unfamiliar with the properties and potential advantages of DME, which can affect adoption rates. Additionally, since DME requires modified engines or special equipment for use, some companies may be hesitant to make these investments without clear evidence of DME’s long-term benefits and sustainability.
Future Prospects and Opportunities
The DME market is positioned to benefit from several ongoing trends and emerging opportunities. As governments worldwide tighten regulations on emissions, DME is likely to gain more traction as a green alternative to conventional fuels. Increasing research in bio-based DME production and the development of dual-fuel engines could further enhance the fuel’s appeal, expanding its applications across industries. The growing emphasis on sustainability and decarbonization goals will likely create new opportunities for DME in power generation, transportation, and even residential use.
In the long term, strategic partnerships between DME producers, automotive companies, and government bodies could accelerate the development of DME infrastructure and boost market awareness. Investments in research and development for cost-effective production methods are expected to make DME more economically competitive, while awareness campaigns could increase adoption across regions and sectors.
Key Player Analysis:
China Energy
AkzoNobel N.V.
Royal Dutch Shell Plc
Mitsubishi Corporation
Oberon Fuels
BP Plc
Grillo-Werke AG
Korea Gas Corporation
Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC)
TotalEnergies
Segmentation:
By Raw Material
Methanol
Bio-Based Feedstock
Coal
Natural Gas
By Application
Aerosol Propellant
LPG Blending
Transportation Fuel
Power Plant Fuel
Chemical Feedstock
Other Applications
By Region
North America
US
Canada
Mexico
Europe
Germany
France
UK
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia Pacific
China
Japan
India
South Korea
South-east Asia
Rest of Asia Pacific
Latin America
Brazil
Argentina
Rest of Latin America
Middle East & Africa
GCC Countries
South Africa
Browse the full report https://www.credenceresearch.com/report/di-methyl-ether-market
Contact:
Credence Research
Please contact us at +91 6232 49 3207
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.credenceresearch.com
0 notes