#Essay writers help Expert

[onlineasignmentservice]

Data Structure Assignment Help

Are you in need of support from a professional in order to see your project on data structure programming through to completion? The next step is to seek assistance from our pros that specialize in programming assignments. They have a comprehensive understanding of Data Structure Programming and are capable of completing any programming project, regardless of how difficult it may be. Do you find that you are unable to do duties related to data structure on your own? Your concerns are no longer warranted in any way! When you have the support of our team of skilled programmers, you will have no trouble completing an assignment involving a Data Structure. For the purpose of providing the most effective data structure coding assistance that is currently available, our programming professionals make use of their significant programming knowledge.

Please visit our website Online Assignment Service for more information.

[nmimsmbasolvedassignments-7]

NMIMS BBA 1st Sem Organization Behaviour & HRM Solved Assignment

NMIMS Dec 2024 General Solved Assignments, NMIMS Dec 2024 Customized MBA Solved Assignments

We are number 1, NMIMS Assignments Academic Writing Professionals.

We are the most reputable and reliable NMIMS Assignments provider in India.

Our commitment to you is 100 % Customized, 100 % Unique, and 100 % Plagiarism-free Assignments because we value your academic integrity.

We provide NMIMS for all courses, such as MBA, BBA, B.Com, and EMBA, and all subjects solved assignments for all semesters.

We offer both General and Customized projects. Please be sure to hurry for quality assignments.

Dr. Aravind Banakar, an esteemed academic writing professional, has over 24 years of experience crafting customized, plagiarism-free assignments and capstone projects across various disciplines.

Dr. Aravindkumar Banakar aravind.banakar@gmail.com +91 9901366442 +91 9902787224https://mbacasestudyanswers.com

NMIMS MBA 1st Sem Solved Assignments

NMIMS MBA Business Communication Solved Assignment

NMIMS MBA Financial Accounting Solved Assignment

NMIMS MBA Micro Economics & Macro Economics Solved Assignment

NMIMS MBA Organizational Behaviour Solved Assignment

NMIMS MBA Marketing Management Solved Assignment

NMIMS MBA Quantitative Methods - I Solved Assignment

NMIMS B.Com 1st Sem Solved Assignments

NMIMS B.Com 1st Sem Principles of Management Solved Assignment

NMIMS B.Com 1st Sem Business Communication Solved Assignment

NMIMS B.Com 1st Sem Financial Accounting Solved Assignment

NMIMS B.Com 1st Sem Micro Economics Solved Assignment

NMIMS B.Com 1st Sem Organisation Behaviour & HRM Solved Assignment

NMIMS B.Com 1st Sem Essentials of IT Solved Assignment

NMIMS BBA 1st Sem Solved Assignments

NMIMS BBA 1st Sem Principles of Management Solved Assignment

NMIMS BBA 1st Sem Business Communication Solved Assignment

NMIMS BBA 1st Sem Financial Accounting Solved Assignment

NMIMS BBA 1st Sem Micro Economics Solved Assignment

NMIMS BBA 1st Sem Organization Behaviour & HRM Solved Assignment

NMIMS BBA 1st Sem Essentials of IT Solved Assignment

NMIMS EMBA Term 1 Solved Assignments

NMIMS EMBA Term 1 Financial Accounting Information for Decisions Solved Assignment

NMIMS EMBA Term 1 Organisational Behaviour Solved Assignment

NMIMS EMBA Term 1 Marketing Management Solved Assignment

NMIMS EMBA Term 1 Business Statistics for Decision Makers Solved Assignment

NMIMS EMBA Term 1 Quantitative Methods Online Course - HBR Solved Assignment

NMIMS EMBA Term 1 Spreadsheet Modelling Online Course: Excel 2013 - HBR Solved Assignment

NMIMS EMBA Term 1 Financial Accounting Online Course - HBR Solved Assignment

[expertacademicassignmenthelp]

Professional Guidance On The Best Thesis Writing Service

Introduction

In the academic journey of a student pursuing higher education, the thesis holds significant importance. It is a culmination of years of study, research, and analysis, representing a student’s expertise in a particular subject. However, crafting a thesis that meets academic standards and fulfills research objectives requires dedication, time, and proficiency in writing. This is where professional thesis writing services come into play, offering assistance and guidance to students in their thesis writing endeavors.

Professional Guidance

Thesis paper writing help services play a crucial role in providing students with the necessary support and resources to produce high-quality theses. These services aid students at various stages of their thesis writing process, from topic selection to final editing. However, with a plethora of thesis writing services available online, choosing the best one can be a daunting task. To help students navigate this challenge effectively, here is a comprehensive guide on selecting the best thesis writing services.

1. Evaluate Reputation and Credibility

The first step in choosing a thesis writing service is to assess its reputation and credibility. Look for reviews, testimonials, and ratings from previous clients to gauge the quality of service offered. A reputable service provider will have positive feedback and a track record of delivering well-researched and professionally written theses.

2. Expertise and Experience

Go for a service that has a team of experienced writers with expertise in your field of study. Thesis writing requires subject-specific knowledge and research skills, so ensure that the writers have relevant qualifications and experience in your area of interest.

3. Customization and Personalization

Every thesis is unique, and it’s essential to choose a writing service that offers customized solutions tailored to your specific requirements. Look for services that allow you to communicate directly with the writer to discuss your ideas, preferences, and expectations.

4. Plagiarism-Free Guarantee

Plagiarism is a serious academic offense, and a reliable thesis writing service should guarantee 100% originality in their work. Ensure that the service provides plagiarism reports and conducts thorough checks using reputable plagiarism detection tools.

5. Timely Delivery

Meeting deadlines is crucial in academic writing, and you should choose a service that prioritizes timely delivery. Discuss the timeline with the service provider and ensure that they can deliver the completed thesis within your specified deadline.

6. Affordability and Transparency

While cost should not be the sole determining factor, it’s essential to consider your budget when choosing a thesis writing service. Look for services that offer transparent pricing with no hidden fees and provide value for your money in terms of quality and service.

7. Customer Support

Effective communication and support are vital throughout the thesis writing process. Choose a service that offers responsive customer support to address any queries or concerns promptly.

Expert Academic Assignment Help: Your Trusted Partner in Thesis Writing

Expert Academic Assignment Help is a reputable academic writing service that has earned a stellar reputation for delivering high-quality thesis writing services across various disciplines. Here’s how Expert Academic Assignment Help fulfills the essential criteria for choosing the best thesis writing services:

Reputation and Credibility

Expert Academic Assignment Help boasts a strong reputation backed by numerous positive reviews and testimonials from satisfied clients. Its credibility is further reinforced by a team of experienced writers who are well-versed in different subjects and academic standards.

Expertise and Experience

The writers at Expert Academic Assignment Help are experts in their respective fields, including finance, Medicine which is a popular area for thesis topics. Whether you need assistance with topics for master thesis in finance or any other subject, Expert Academic Assignment Help has the expertise to deliver outstanding results.

Customization and Personalization

Expert Academic Assignment Help offers personalized thesis writing services tailored to each client’s unique requirements. You can collaborate directly with the assigned writer to discuss your thesis objectives, research findings, and writing style preferences.

Plagiarism-Free Guarantee

Expert Academic Assignment Help prioritizes originality and guarantees plagiarism-free content in all its deliverables. The writers conduct thorough research and cite sources accurately to ensure academic integrity.

Timely Delivery

Expert Academic Assignment Help understands the importance of meeting deadlines and strives to deliver completed theses within the agreed-upon timeframe. You can rely on their punctuality and professionalism throughout the writing process.

Affordability and Transparency

Expert Academic Assignment Help offers competitive pricing with transparent rates and no hidden charges. They provide flexible payment options and ensure that you get value for your investment.

Customer Support

Expert Academic Assignment Help customer support team is available 24/7 to address any queries or concerns you may have. You can reach out to us via live chat, email, or phone for prompt assistance.

In conclusion, choosing the best thesis writing services requires careful consideration of various factors such as reputation, expertise, customization, plagiarism policy, timeliness, affordability, and customer support. Expert Academic Assignment Help stands out as a trusted partner for students seeking top-notch thesis paper writing help services, especially Health Sciences and other academic disciplines. With Expert Academic Assignment Help, you can rest assured that your thesis will be handled with professionalism, dedication, and expertise, leading to academic success and recognition.

In conclusion, I urge students to consider seeking guidance and assistance for their thesis, research, dissertation, essays, and online classes. Expert Academic Assignment Help offers professional support tailored to your academic needs. Don’t hesitate to reach out via email at expertassignment46@gmail.com for expert help and guidance. Your academic success is our priority.

[papercoach]

Enhance your memory with the "Method of Loci." 🧠 Associate study material with specific locations or objects to recall information better during exams. 💡

[peter-pett]

Online Research Ethics: Navigating the Challenges of Internet-Based Studies

The Rise of Online Research

The internet has transformed the way research is conducted. Gone are the days of traditional surveys and in-person interviews as the sole means of data collection. Today, researchers have a plethora of online tools and platforms at their disposal, enabling them to reach wider audiences and gather data more efficiently.

Online research offers numerous advantages:

Cost Efficiency: Conducting research online often reduces costs associated with data collection, such as travel expenses and printing materials.

Real-time Data Collection: Online surveys and data collection methods provide real-time results, expediting the research process.

Anonymity: Participants may feel more comfortable sharing sensitive information online, thanks to the anonymity that the internet provides.

Ethical Considerations in Online Research

While online research presents exciting opportunities, it also raises important ethical considerations. Researchers must navigate these challenges to ensure the integrity of their studies and the well-being of their participants. Here are some key ethical considerations in online research:

Privacy and Data Security: Protecting the privacy and data security of participants is crucial. Researchers must implement secure data storage and transmission practices and clearly communicate how participant data will be handled.

Anonymity and Confidentiality: Researchers should respect participants' wishes for anonymity and confidentiality. It's essential to explain how data will be anonymized and stored securely.

Deception: Researchers must avoid deceptive practices. Any deception in the research design should be carefully justified and minimized to the extent possible.

Online Community Guidelines: Researchers conducting studies on social media platforms or online communities should adhere to platform guidelines and obtain necessary permissions.

Ensuring Ethical Online Research

To conduct ethical online research, researchers can follow these best practices:

Review Ethical Guidelines: Familiarize yourself with ethical guidelines and regulations relevant to your research, such as those provided by institutional review boards (IRBs) or ethics committees.

Informed Consent: Create a clear and comprehensive informed consent process. Use plain language and provide participants with the option to ask questions.

Anonymity and Confidentiality: Clearly explain how participant data will be anonymized and kept confidential. Use secure data storage and transmission methods.

Minimize Harm: Minimize the potential harm to participants. Ensure that your research design prioritizes participant well-being and safety.

Community Guidelines: If your research involves online communities, adhere to platform guidelines and seek permission from community administrators if necessary.

Online research has expanded the horizons of what is possible in the field of research. However, with these opportunities come ethical responsibilities. Researchers must navigate the complexities of online research ethics to ensure the integrity of their studies and the well-being of their participants. For researchers seeking guidance and support in conducting ethical online research, services like PaperCoach are invaluable resources. PaperCoach offers a range of academic services and resources to assist researchers in their ethical research endeavors. To learn more about how PaperCoach can support your research and ethical considerations, visit PaperCoach.

[literaryvein-reblogs]

Writing Notes: Revision Strategies

When the time comes for revision, it can cause stress for writers of every level.

After all, it can be hard to delete or change words you spent hours writing.

To help reduce this stress, the following lists a few revision strategies.

READ IT ALOUD

Although it can be awkward at first, reading your work aloud can be one of the best revision strategies.

1. Catching Typos

When reading silently, your brain might skip over or correct small errors because it makes educated guesses about what the words are trying to say.

However, reading aloud forces you to slow down and see what is actually written.

2. Identifying Sentences That Flow Awkwardly

If you have ever read an incredibly long sentence in someone’s work, you know that it can be hard to follow the person’s train of thought.

These sentences are hard to catch in your own writing, but reading aloud will make them almost impossible to miss.

It is natural to take a breath in between sentences, so if you find yourself out of breath while reading aloud a single sentence, or having difficulty following the main idea/s of a sentence, the sentence likely needs to be revised.

SHARE YOUR WORK

It can be unnerving to ask others to read your work, but the payoff is more than worth it.

1. Another Reader Can Offer A New Perspective

It is easy to miss small details in your own work, especially when you have been looking at the same document for a long time.

Furthermore, because you are an expert on your own topic, you may not notice whether your essay effectively lays the groundwork necessary for those unfamiliar with the topic.

Ask a friend, family member, or a writing consultant to read your draft and offer feedback.

Moreover, telling your readers what to focus on ensures they pay special attention to the elements you want to revise.

2. Edit for Grammar Last

Even a grammatically-sound paper can fall flat if the content does not meet a reader’s expectations.

Your top priority during revision should be to make sure that you have made your point/s clearly.

Save the editing of punctuation and grammar until after you finish revising a draft.

3. Manage Your Stress

If you get a lot of feedback on what to revise, make and prioritize a list of the comments.

After taking the time to digest everything, focus on each individual item on your list.

Cross off items as you complete them so that you have a physical representation of the work you have finished.

TAKE TIME AWAY

Leave yourself enough room in your schedule to take time away from your completed rough draft; time away from your writing is an important part of revision.

1. Recharging Throughout the Process

It is taxing to begin revision immediately after finishing a draft and can discourage writers.

Giving yourself a break between writing and revising allows you to rest and recharge, so when you revise, you have more energy to spend on the process.

2. Refreshing Your Perspective

Taking a break allows you to distance yourself from your work so that you can read through it more objectively.

This fresh perspective allows you to see what might need clarification, refined organization, elaboration, or other revision work.

3. Coming Back from a Break

Instead of immediately jumping into sentence-level revisions during your first read-through of a draft, focus on reading your writing from start to finish at least once without interruptions.

This enables you to see how well your writing flows, catch any repetition, and determine whether anything might be missing.

Writing Notes & References

[covid-safer-hotties]

Also preserved on our archive

by Miles W. Griffis

Atinuki “Tinu” Abayomi-Paul, a prominent writer and disability advocate, died on September 26 at home in Texas. She was 52.

Abayomi-Paul was well known in the Long COVID and disability community for her writing, speaking, and mutual aid organizing. She was the founder of Everywhere Accessible, an advocacy organization which she launched in 2019 to educate the public about accessibility and center the experiences of Black disabled women.

In 2022, she was hospitalized with COVID-19, leading to COVID-induced pneumonia. She later developed chronic lymphocytic leukemia, as well as Long COVID, myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), and other chronic illnesses.

She recently spoke with The Sick Times about her experience with extreme heat and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).

“My fear for the future is that those of us who cannot tolerate the heat will die,” she said. “Another fear I have is that no one will listen.”

Abayomi-Paul frequently wrote about and helped break stigmas about immunocompromised people. She centered the experiences of the most marginalized, who were left behind in the government’s failed response to the continuing COVID-19 pandemic.

“I hope my story humanizes the experience of having COVID for people,” she wrote in an essay following her hospitalization. “Those of us at high risk aren’t abstract people you’ve never met. We’re people you know and love, and we might die because you won’t wear a mask.”

Over the past week, friends, family, and members of the disability community have written tributes to Abayomi-Paul for her leadership, care, and community building.

“She had such giggly personality, but was often so tired from just trying to stay afloat,” disability advocate Imani Barbarin wrote on Twitter/X. “Still, she loved this community and consistently felt like she wasn’t doing enough. Tinu, you were enough.”

“She gave so much of herself and cared about the disability community deeply,” Alice Wong wrote. In another tribute, Sarah Reneé stated that she “advocated with spoons she didn’t have not just for herself, but the entire community.”

“Many of us owe our lives and the evolution of our politics to disabled Black women like [Tinu] and [Shafiqah Hudson],” writer Clarkisha Kent posted.

Like Abayomi-Paul, Hudson died while battling Long COVID and cancer. Hudson passed in February 2024 at an extended-stay hotel in Portland, Oregon; she stated before her death that if she died, Long COVID was the cause.

Abayomi-Paul’s cause of death has not been stated. She wrote on August 3, 2024: “People not masking is literally killing me… If I do die, this is what killed me, people not masking or believing Long COVID lowers your immunity…”

While research has extensively documented the disabling symptoms and scope of Long COVID, science and health institutions have paid less attention to the disease’s potentially deadly consequences.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in early 2024 that over 5,000 Americans have died with Long COVID since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, but experts say this number is likely a significant undercount. Along with improved reporting standards, people with Long COVID need immediate support to prevent further fatalities, experts and advocates say.

Abayomi-Paul’s family and friends are currently fundraising for her funeral, medical expenses, and other costs. They are also planning a service — the date has not yet been released.

[onlineasignmentservice]

College Assignment Help

When you start college, assignments will always be there, even if your pals aren't. Unfortunately, because they don't know them well enough, most students don't think of this new acquaintance as their best friend. They are essentially enemies to many. Assignments overlook the fact that students need space, have social lives, and are not disruptive colleagues. They also overlook the fact that understanding the assignment title, researching the topic, creating an outline, writing the first draft, editing, and proofreading are all stressful and time-consuming processes. Therefore, a college assignment helper is necessary for these students. But finding a trustworthy company that provides thorough, original assistance with college projects is challenging. With the help of over 5000 PhDs on staff and online tools like Onlineassignmentservice.com that help students with their college assignments, you may quickly produce outstanding papers on over 100 topics. What other services do these professionals provide for college assignments? Visit our website.

[nmimsmbasolvedassignments-7]

NMIMS BBA 1st Sem Micro Economics Solved Assignment

NMIMS Dec 2024 BBM Solved Assignments, NMIMS Dec 2024 B.COM Solved Assignments

We are number 1, NMIMS Assignments Academic Writing Professionals.

We are the most reputable and reliable NMIMS Assignments provider in India.

Our commitment to you is 100 % Customized, 100 % Unique, and 100 % Plagiarism-free Assignments because we value your academic integrity.

We provide NMIMS for all courses, such as MBA, BBA, B.Com, and EMBA, and all subjects solved assignments for all semesters.

We offer both General and Customized projects. Please be sure to hurry for quality assignments.

Dr. Aravind Banakar, an esteemed academic writing professional, has over 24 years of experience crafting customized, plagiarism-free assignments and capstone projects across various disciplines.

Dr. Aravindkumar Banakar aravind.banakar@gmail.com +91 9901366442 +91 9902787224https://mbacasestudyanswers.com

NMIMS MBA 1st Sem Solved Assignments

NMIMS MBA Business Communication Solved Assignment

NMIMS MBA Financial Accounting Solved Assignment

NMIMS MBA Micro Economics & Macro Economics Solved Assignment

NMIMS MBA Organizational Behaviour Solved Assignment

NMIMS MBA Marketing Management Solved Assignment

NMIMS MBA Quantitative Methods - I Solved Assignment

NMIMS B.Com 1st Sem Solved Assignments

NMIMS B.Com 1st Sem Principles of Management Solved Assignment

NMIMS B.Com 1st Sem Business Communication Solved Assignment

NMIMS B.Com 1st Sem Financial Accounting Solved Assignment

NMIMS B.Com 1st Sem Micro Economics Solved Assignment

NMIMS B.Com 1st Sem Organisation Behaviour & HRM Solved Assignment

NMIMS B.Com 1st Sem Essentials of IT Solved Assignment

NMIMS BBA 1st Sem Solved Assignments

NMIMS BBA 1st Sem Principles of Management Solved Assignment

NMIMS BBA 1st Sem Business Communication Solved Assignment

NMIMS BBA 1st Sem Financial Accounting Solved Assignment

NMIMS BBA 1st Sem Micro Economics Solved Assignment

NMIMS BBA 1st Sem Organization Behaviour & HRM Solved Assignment

NMIMS BBA 1st Sem Essentials of IT Solved Assignment

NMIMS EMBA Term 1 Solved Assignments

NMIMS EMBA Term 1 Financial Accounting Information for Decisions Solved Assignment

NMIMS EMBA Term 1 Organisational Behaviour Solved Assignment

NMIMS EMBA Term 1 Marketing Management Solved Assignment

NMIMS EMBA Term 1 Business Statistics for Decision Makers Solved Assignment

NMIMS EMBA Term 1 Quantitative Methods Online Course - HBR Solved Assignment

NMIMS EMBA Term 1 Spreadsheet Modelling Online Course: Excel 2013 - HBR Solved Assignment

NMIMS EMBA Term 1 Financial Accounting Online Course - HBR Solved Assignment

[expertacademicassignmenthelp]

What Makes a PhD Dissertation Different from a Masters Thesis?

Introduction

In the realm of academia, pursuing advanced degrees such as a Master’s or a PhD involves rigorous research and scholarly endeavors. Central to this academic journey are the culminating projects — the Master’s thesis and the PhD dissertation. While often used interchangeably, these two academic works possess distinct characteristics that set them apart. In this comprehensive discussion, we will major into the differences between a PhD dissertation and a Master’s thesis, exploring various aspects including the depth of research, original contribution to knowledge, duration and intensity of study, evaluation and defense process, as well as career implications and academic prestige.

Depth of Research

One of the fundamental disparities between a PhD dissertation and a Master’s thesis lies in the depth of research. A Master’s thesis typically explores a specific topic within a field of study, offering a comprehensive analysis but within a more confined framework. In contrast, a PhD dissertation delves into original research, contributing novel insights or advancing existing knowledge within the chosen discipline. The depth of investigation required for a dissertation is considerably greater, often involving extensive data collection, analysis, and interpretation.

Original Contribution to Knowledge

Building upon the notion of originality, a PhD dissertation is expected to make a significant contribution to the body of knowledge within the respective field. It must demonstrate a unique perspective, innovative methodology, or novel findings that add value to the academic discourse. On the other hand, while a Master’s thesis also involves original research, its contribution may be more incremental or focused on synthesizing existing literature rather than forging new paths of inquiry.

Duration and Intensity of Study

Another factor that distinguishes a PhD dissertation from a Master’s thesis is the duration and intensity of study involved. Pursuing a PhD typically entails a more prolonged and immersive engagement with the research topic, spanning several years of dedicated study and inquiry. The process of conducting original research, analyzing data, and drafting a dissertation demands a substantial commitment of time and effort. In contrast, a Master’s thesis can often be completed within a shorter timeframe, typically ranging from one to two years, depending on the program’s requirements.

Evaluation and Defense Process

The evaluation and defense process also differ between a PhD dissertation and a Master’s thesis. For a PhD dissertation, the candidate must present their research findings to a committee of faculty members or experts in the field. This oral defense involves a rigorous examination of the dissertation’s methodology, results, and conclusions, as well as the candidate’s ability to articulate and defend their research. In contrast, while some Master’s programs may require a thesis defense, the level of scrutiny and formality is often less intense compared to a PhD dissertation defense.

Career Implications and Academic Prestige

Furthermore, the completion of a PhD dissertation carries significant career implications and academic prestige. Attaining a PhD is often regarded as the highest level of academic achievement, opening doors to advanced research positions, teaching opportunities, and leadership roles within academia and industry. A PhD dissertation serves as a hallmark of expertise and scholarly rigor, signaling to the academic community and potential employers the candidate’s ability to conduct independent research at a high level. On the other hand, while a Master’s thesis is a commendable accomplishment in its own right, it may not carry the same weight in terms of career advancement or academic recognition as a PhD dissertation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the comparison between a PhD dissertation and a Master’s thesis reveals the intricate differences that exist between these two academic endeavors. While both represent significant milestones in academic scholarship, they embody distinct attributes that reflect the depth of research, originality of contribution, and level of academic achievement. Whether seeking thesis vs. dissertation writing help or PhD dissertation assistance, students embarking on these scholarly endeavors can benefit from the guidance and support offered by dissertation writing services. With expert assistance, aspiring scholars can navigate the complexities of research, writing, and presentation, ensuring their academic work meets the highest standards of excellence and scholarly rigor

Understanding the differences between a PhD dissertation and a Master’s thesis is crucial for students embarking on academic research. Expert Academic Assignment Help offers personalized support at every stage of the process, ensuring academic excellence. Reach out at expertassignment46@gmail.com to benefit from expertise and guidance in navigating the complexities of research, writing, and presentation.

[papercoach]

We offer a free plagiarism report with every order, so you can be sure that your work is original, so you can be sure that you're satisfied with our service 🔐

[eretzyisrael]

by Matti Friedman

The failure of Holocaust education has been most sharply observed by the writer Dara Horn, particularly in a prescient essay for The Atlantic last spring and before that in a 2021 book, People Love Dead Jews. After visiting numerous museums and speaking to educators who teach Holocaust curricula, she concludes in the essay, “The bedrock assumption that has endured for nearly half a century is that learning about the Holocaust inoculates people against antisemitism. But it doesn’t.” 

By turning the Holocaust into a generic story about prejudice, Horn argues, Holocaust education left its recipients without any understanding of the specific problem facing Jews—or even much sympathy for real Jews in the present. 

This was the argument she made half a year before the Hamas attack of October 7 and its aftershocks, when any doubts about the accuracy of Horn’s hypothesis were put to rest. The well-meaning donors who’ve footed the astronomical bill for museums, memorials, classes, and films should ask for their money back.

The confusion between knowledge of the how and of the why is illustrated, inadvertently, in the figure of one of the experts interviewed in Evil on Trial, Omer Bartov, a Holocaust historian at Brown who describes himself as a “historian of genocide.” Bartov, who is Israeli, belongs to Israel’s most unfortunate export category—namely, academics who find a home for themselves on an increasingly unhinged Western left by reassuring their comrades that their dark fantasies about Israel are sane. Barely a month after October 7, Bartov wrote a New York Times op-ed accusing Israel of “crimes against humanity” and warning of a possible “genocide” in Gaza, taking the two key terms first invented to describe the Nazis and deploying them against Jews. Then, after visiting one of the college encampments where Zionists are cast as malevolent global villains, he reassured an interviewer from Democracy Now! that he’d seen nothing amiss and that antisemitism on American campuses “does not exist in any significant form.” The protesters may be trafficking in lurid stories of Jewish evil, but the Holocaust professor thinks that this time the stories are true.Prisoner shoes on display at the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp, Oświęcim, Poland. (via Alamy)

One of the blithe assumptions of Holocaust narrative has always been that no one would identify with the Nazis, but this is wrong. They’re villains, to be sure, but also strong figures, men of action. Just as the best character in Schindler’s List is the Nazi commandant played by Ralph Fiennes, the best character in Evil on Trial is Adolf Hitler, acted with deranged energy in the reenactment scenes by Károly Kozma. When I finished the series on Netflix, I saw that I could continue to Hitler’s Circle of Evil, then to Hitler: A Career, and then to five other movies with title screens featuring Nazis. All of this manages not only to bestow upon the Nazis a kind of dark glamor but also to reassure everyone that if you don’t have a red band on your arm and a skull on your hat, you’re fine. 

The Jews, on the other hand, tend to be mostly absent as real characters. They occasionally appear to be marched away with their hands up or shot into ditches in their underwear. But we don’t get a sense of who they are, or why their difference—and particularly their stubborn refusal to adopt whatever ideology is current—has repeatedly turned them into figures of hate. 

The liberal West may believe itself to be post-Christian, but it’s still the world created by an ideological system that co-opted Judaism and then developed a furious resentment toward its continued existence, thus establishing a civilizational pattern that seems destined to repeat forever.

If Holocaust stories treat Jews as props, they miss understanding what the Jews think about what’s happening to them. And what they think is worth consideration, not just out of courtesy.

Judaism is a religion with a very long memory, and Jewish texts include stories of oppression and extermination stretching back to Pharaoh in the Book of Exodus. Europe’s Jews saw the threat as a continuum that didn’t start or end with Hitler. They knew he was a symptom of the problem, not the problem itself. It is this insight, unlike the details of SS hierarchy or the sadism of Dr. Mengele, that has the power to help us make sense of the world we see right now. 

[bao3bei4]

ON THE TSHIRT METHOD TO WRITING ESSAYS IN YOUR OWN TIME: 

i have had a couple people mention to me that they would like to write essays too, but they are a little out of practice. so i thought i should gather some scattered thoughts into one place. this is not a systematic guide. i am young and inexperienced and still working out things for myself, but this is my basic process and some things that have helped me, summarized. 

my biggest single piece of advice is to write with your proverbial pussy. you are not writing for a grade so don't act like it. forget rigor, forget academic style, etc. read what you're interested in, and write following up on the threads that you're interested in. don’t sweat the details. just do you.

if you still need more advice..... here’s a long winded post. 

step zero: if you have no clue what you want to say yet 

read. and read a lot.

but be realistic. be kind to yourself. your attention is a precious resource, and it is getting eaten up by shit out of your control all the time. if you’ve had a busy day, you may still have the brain power left to read. i almost never do. lol. so make sure to carve out time on a day off, if possible. otherwise you might end up completely fried, reading the same sentence over and over, and ending up scrolling on your phone LMAO. <-- painful lesson also to this end, if you haven’t picked up a denser book in a while, start with shorter articles, especially ones written more recently. if your attention wanders, try getting a physical book instead. the most important thing is just starting things you’ll actually read.  i’ve seen a lot of people (and been that person) who was like. “oh i’m going to start with THE canonical text in a subject i’m interested in” which makes sense right? but that book is inevitably long and dense and convoluted and boring. you can come back to it later. this shouldn’t feel like a chore! 

genuinely this is the most helpful thing you can do is just. read anything. it may be difficult at first (or always), but it is still the easiest way to engage with the foremost experts from around the world and the entirety of written history on any subject you are interested in. there’s not really a substitute to this. 

note: you may say that people can and do come up with brilliant ideas independently of their access to written works. this is true! but if you are one of them, you should skip this section/post, because you already know what you want to say.  okay that was a little too facetious. let me revise: when i say that, without reading, it will be hard to come up with more complex ideas than what you have now, that isn’t necessarily pejorative. maybe your current ideas and impulses are original and meaningful and complex. if they aren’t, however, you don’t have to resign yourself to it.  your experiences in real life are the most valuable thing you can bring to the table, but it can be very difficult to articulate and contextualize them without community—whether that be irl, or the simple textual company of other writers. you can let other people help you and teach you.  basically, this is a long winded way of saying something extremely simple: reading is not the only way to gain knowledge, or even the best. but it is an extremely consistent and relatively egalitarian way.** **scihub and libgen and sometimes the public library are your friends. (my local library’s book coverage is spotty) who cares about piracy. LMAO. 

you may surprise yourself by how nicely you fall into little spirals. you read one thing. and you are enamored with the way the author approaches their subject. so you end up reading everything else they’ve written, and then you start on the authors they list that inspire them in their interviews. maybe you just read one article that’s a little dry but it cites something else that seems far more interesting. read that next. and so on. 

if you are struggling to read that’s okay. you have options. start a book club (or just get a friend who also wants to read more). if that sounds like too much work, pick a friend to keep updated on all your new facts. you just want to get used to reading something, and telling someone your favorite parts again. skim books. skip the boring parts. drop them entirely and find a more interesting one. no one’s going to quiz you. this is for your own enjoyment. 

also important here: read books that make you want to write. sometimes this is because the methods and/or prose of the author are so exciting, you want to do something just like that. sometimes it’s because the content is so exciting, you want to say something about that too. sometimes they speak so powerfully to your own life, you want to tell people this is me!! i see this!! there are books i just enjoy reading, sure, and i do read them. but you know how, like, a good movie makes you want to tell stories too? good theory should do that too, in my opinion. 

step one: you have some ideas now. 

these ideas don’t have to be set in stone. but you should have an idea now of what you might talk about. personally, for me, i have two interconnected types of essay ideas. 

interventions. this is like [tumblr voice] Why Is Nobody Talking About This. i see some sort of hole. maybe i know how to fill it, maybe i don’t. 

free associations. basically i read one thing, or some analysis of one thing. and then it reminded me of another thing. and i’m like. i want to tease apart their connections, their similarities, and their differences. 

there are more types of ideas, i’m sure. but these are the ones i consistently have. with me, the second kind is more common. very rarely do i find that my thoughts are that original. rather, i’ve found that one of my strengths as a writer is being able to make connections that other people haven’t made, or haven’t made in depth before. IN MY OPINION. 

so i find it quite flexible. maybe i watch a movie, and it reminds me of my own life, because i think two women in the movie could be sad queer freaks. and i’m a sad queer freak. or it could be that i think scum villain could be analyzed through the framework of freudian psychoanalysis. you get the idea. 

at this stage of the process, i don’t have a thesis, necessarily. but i have a couple phrases i’m drawn to. i have a bullet point or two. i have vibes. 

to use an example from this blog, one of my friends hui once mentioned that that one fan image was going around again. we were going ughhh it’s victorian not chinese! together and they said “you should write a meta on it.” i wasn’t sure quite yet what i had to say. but i knew a couple things. 

this is, incidentally, because i had done some research into chinoiserie before, because i had cited the zuroski book for a paper i had to write for an english class some years before on pride and prejudice and its use of descriptions of material culture, an essay that in turn was inspired by my random yet deeply felt conviction that jane austen hated me personally and wanted to kill me.  this is why i encourage reading a lot. i think. 

to work on this stage, make lists. lots of them. i have a .txt file where i keep every essay idea i have. a lot of them are a sentence. or they're lists of books or theorists i think i could make something out of. or they're theses that feel true, but i’m not sure why yet. 

it took me a while to get to this point. just like with writing fic, there was a period when i first started where i was like. i only have one idea. i’m going to write it, and then i’m never going to write again. and then i had just one more idea. after a while. eventually you will find you have so many ideas and the world is full of possibilities. it’s a muscle you have to flex. like reading. and telling people about what you’re reading. 

actually, i feel like there was a step 0.5 here that i completely skipped. 

step zero point five that i skipped: how to generate ideas

my very truly complete “first time writing something semi-academic that was original” (with a loose definition of the word original) was literally just me reading literary criticism of one book, and saying “i think this author’s thoughts can be applied to this other book” and found some textual evidence that supported that the process could be replicated. 

this is like, writing with training wheels on. eventually i got better at it (see aforementioned chinoiserie essay. i hope you agree.). but that was a good place to start for me. it made the proverbial blank page less intimidating, knowing i had a scaffolding. 

i suggest trying this. see how it goes for you. read around until you find some piece of criticism, or just some theory about how something works, that you like. and using your newfound hammer, go look for some nails. 

note: i know this expression is meant to like. be a negative thing. but you do have to start somewhere. it’s okay if it sucks. it’s just for your practice and your enjoyment. 

be cautious of stances. weak writing (in my OPINIONNNN) tries to unilaterally defend or condemn a behavior. what you need to do is treat your writing as a bit. and then you need to run with it. you need to take it farther than what is reasonable. if this bit is truly actually deeply true, then what does it mean about yourself? it’s like using a new set of pronouns as a joke or something. you know what i mean? (that was an example of what i’m trying to communicate here)

what else is key to look out for... look for oppositional pairs or tensions. look for perverse incentives and vicious circles. look for embarrassing ideas. that is, what would be extremely embarrassing if it was true? (or to admit that it was true) you may go—tshirt, here you’re just describing things that are sexy. yes, exactly, that’s the point. you want things that thrill. 

just keep reading and making notes until everything echoes with something else. now you’re ready for step two. 

step two: refine your ideas further. 

let me do this by demonstration. once more extending my earlier example of my chinoiserie essay, i knew that i really wanted to take zuroski’s points and basically... steal them. this is called “citation,” i guess. but i thought the following insights were useful to me: 

british women were invested in chinese material objects 

they incorporated them into their own subjectivity

past a certain point, they no longer “consumed” these signifiers, but these signifers became theirs 

critique of one was able to stand in for critique of the other

and from being on fandom twitter, i already had the following insights: 

people deliberately blurred the lines between china and england when it came to fans and tea

people also liked talking about victorian modesty when it came to china 

so it seemed like victorian england and china had a privileged relationship, in a lot of people’s minds in fandom. 

so it didn’t really seem a stretch to say... how can we look at one history, and apply it to our present? 

it was a bit of the combo of the two: i saw something i didn’t see people were talking about, and it reminded me of something else i’d read before. 

something that helps me a lot is tweeting about my essay ideas. if you have me on my private account, you already know this. it forces me to explain myself to someone who doesn’t know what i’m talking about in a very succinct way. oftentimes, i tweet something out while i’m brainstorming, and then i steal the phrasing back into my essay. see? tweets can be writing too. 

this is microdosing on step zero’s “read something and practice telling a friend about it.” now you’re writing something and telling a friend about it. 

step three: okay now you can like. open a google doc 

make an outline. i know i know i know. i’m sorry. you can start just barfing thoughts if you want, but eventually everything that was on the top of your head will be out. and now you can start thinking about structure. the reason the outline is important is because it makes clear the logical progression from one idea to the next. 

i know i usually bounce around in my writing (a tendency which has been magnified here because this is so casual LMAO), but i always want to make sure that my points are substantiated. if we want to talk about how a causes b, we should prove a, we should prove the causal link, and only then can we infer b, for instance. it doesn’t really matter what order that happens in (or even that we set about it that way), but the more complicated your idea is, the longer checklist you need. it’s just a checklist. that’s all. 

as you start writing, you’ll probably need to read some more. you’re going to want to say something you think is true, but you’re going to realize that you haven’t proved it (or you can’t). go look to see if someone else has proved it. 

maybe you’re right. add that evidence in. maybe you’re wrong. now your essay has a new direction. there is a living thing beneath you. actually, on that idea— 

i tend to structure my outlines (if i’m not sure yet what my point is) by pasting a bunch of quotes in a document, and reorganizing them until they make sense, they seem to flow. and then i start explaining why, until i realized i have begun to walk off in a new direction. always embrace that new direction. eventually you will find that you have not been taking twists and turns, but actually you were dizzily walking along a straight path. (unless you have been unfocused and you are trying to say too many things at once. ask a friend to read your essay if you’re not sure which is the case.) 

quotes are the smallest unit of your analysis. work with evidence. or, at least, i do. it makes writing an essay like solving a mystery. the idea of just spontaneously generating something new fills me with terror. rather, i want to autopsy something, trace its steps, and then discover how it came to be dead. this may not be true for you. but it’s true for meeeee and this is my post. 

tl;dr

0. read something and tell someone about it/post it out

0.5. come up with a bit and run with it

1. think "why is no one talking about this" or start free associating

2. come up with weird connections and tell someone about it/post it out

3. collect all of your posts and ideas into a gdoc and organize them.

anyway i like reading posts like this because i’m incredibly nosy. so i tried to write out the sort of thing i like to read from other people. i don’t suggest you actually try to replicate it (if anyone would even want to.) practically basically i just encourage you to try any single part of this that you think was interesting or relatable or helpful. personally, i suggest reading a book and posting your favorite lines from it. if you do this a couple times, i think you will find the seeds of an essay waiting for you in your own posts. 

[literaryvein-reblogs]

Writing Notes: The Rhetorical Triangle

Rhetorical Triangle - a simple, useful tool that can help you develop a strong and well thought-out essay, especially in persuasive writing and speeches.

Each side of the triangle represents one of the three classical rhetorical approaches used to build informative, persuasive arguments that influence audiences in specific, powerful ways.

There are many visual representations of the Rhetorical Triangle available online, such as the following:

The 3 Classical Appeals: Ethos, Pathos and Logos

Each of the three approaches attempts to prove arguments and persuade readers by emphasizing a specific type of appeal.

These appeals are not mutually exclusive, and you will often find elements of all three working together in effective writing.

Ethos: Appeals to Credibility and Authority

To use this appeal, you might emphasize experience or educational background, your own or those of your sources, as the reason the reader should believe you.

By citing credentials, the argument is being built on the word of experts.

Your reader expects to acknowledge the qualifications of the individuals or organizations presented as capable of supporting an argument with valid, factual, and credible information.

Pathos: Appeals to Emotions

Although this appeal is not as commonly used in academic writing as the other two, it does appear regularly in literary work.

Recognizing and using pathos appeals to personal values and emotions, which are some of the most powerful appeals.

Logos: Appeals to Logic and Reasoning

When you think about academic writing, you probably think of logic-based writing, which targets a reader’s intellect and often includes facts that build upon each other to support complex arguments.

Because this appeal relies on a reader being able to follow well-constructed arguments, it is critical this writing is clear, organized, and focused.

Extra information that does not directly support the logic of the arguments can distract and confuse a reader, and ultimately weaken an argument.

Identifying and Using Rhetorical Appeals

Now that you are familiar with each of the three rhetorical appeals, you can consider how you might use them in your writing, based on the specific rhetorical situation you are working with.

ETHOS

If your paper is discussing the effects of drinking and driving, you might include an interview with a veteran DPS Trooper who can discuss his fifteen years of experience working New Year’s Eve patrols. His professional credentials help your readers believe his observations and ideas are informed, relevant, and appropriate to the topic. By citing them, you are presenting your source’s DPS training, certifications, and experience as the reason your readers should accept your argument.

Incorporating topic information from reliable, well-informed sources strengthens your argument and makes it easier for your reader to accept.

Writers present their source’s credentials through in-text citations as well as through their Works Cited listings.

These citations provide your readers with the background and information they need to evaluate the quality and credibility of your sources.

PATHOS

If your goal is to get your reader to feel something, or to take a certain action, you may find this appeal highly effective.

Think about the popular TV commercials that raise money for abused animals. Those commercials are designed to make viewers feel sadness by showing images of pain and suffering. By the end, they switch to hopeful images and dialogue to inspire viewers to take a specific action and become supporters of their cause.

Pathos is often used in literature. Think about stories that seem to come alive in some way. Perhaps it is a character to whom readers can genuinely relate or stories that make readers feel happy, sad, or angry.

Writing that evokes emotion often uses Pathos. It is also commonly used in spoken word compositions like speeches, poetry, and theater.

When possible, including thoughtfully chosen images and music is another way you can use pathos through sensory details to connect with your audience’s emotions.

LOGOS

To create logical support in your work, you might include data, case studies, statistics, lab reports, and other similar information.

This is a popular appeal, and if you watch for it, you will find it used to support claims in everything from scientific reports to advertising, such as the familiar “Nine out of ten dentists recommend using an automatic toothbrush over regular brushing.”

COMBINING RHETORICAL APPEALS

As you start planning your essay, you may find that a combination of appeals works best.

Example: You might decide that case studies and lab reports will provide the best data to support your claims, focusing on only highly-qualified sources that are well known in your field.

By making these choices, you are employing the power of both Logos and Ethos into your essay, a combination that will result in a clear, organized, credible, and effective argument that conveys your message.

Source ⚜ Writing Notes & References

[thatfrenchacademic]

OK so about this "34, unmarried and childless" article about Taylor Swift. Let me tell you about Scam Academia.

TL;DR: some mediocre dude had a half baked opinio nabout Taylor Swift that everyone hated, but like Mother Nature I let nothing go to waste.

Here is the take you have not heard yet, about this opinion: this guy is actually a good case study on how to develop your academic literacy, aka how to recognize a true academic from a scammer who presents themselves as an academic, but is just a crook. In a world of pseudoscience and pretend experts that have enough resources to organize their flat earth conference, let me walk you through the world of Scam Academic, where for a few thousand dollars, you too can claim to be a researcher with a doctorate! Follow me down a rabbit hole that I hate with my whole heart!

Preamble: I have zero skin in the TS game. I don't get the hype, the lore, the obsession with those 2000s bracelet or dissecting every single line or every single song.

But then. Some guy had to write an op-ed stating Taylor Swift was not a good role model for girls ("in the US and beyond"), and it is a terrible take on so many level, but here is the thing. Whiny conservative think-pieces about highly successful women who should get back to the kitchen and think of the children are nothing new. But this one is different.

This one is fucking terribly written. It's just an abysmally written blog post. Genuinely one of the worst thing I have ever read, and I read hundreds of undergrad essays every year for a living. It contradicts its own arguments in every paragraph. It over-explains concepts like it's a high school essay and he's trying to meet the word count. It says "this is a valid question worth asking" but does not actually explain why it is worth asking. It is so, so, so bad.

Conservative writers are usually more the "high brow, drowning you in grandstanding" kind of writers. They are, usually, good technical writers - it's the one thing that helps make their talking point sound legit and palatable. So an abysmally bad conservative writer? Ok, I am intrigued.

The author is one John Mac Ghlionn. I look up the guy on Google and...

Oh.

Oh no, John.

Spewing conservative bullshit at women AND a researcher? You're in my turf now, John. You could have continued to cover UFC Pillow Fight Championships, or alien technology and other riveting subjects, but you had try to connect two brain cells to argue a thing, and slap "researcher" on top of it. Now I'm offended, as a researcher.

1. I am sorry, researcher WHERE?

Ok so if one is a "researcher", it means one conduct "research". and contrary to what backyard conspiracy theorists think, "researcher" is an actual job. It is an actual professional occupation. You get an actual contract, and you are paid actual money. By an actual employer: public (University), private (Think tank, private company), or a mix of both (at Unviersity, but on a privately funded project, for example).

So where does our John Mc Ghlionn work?

Well. Nowhere, as far as I can tell.

John does not list any affiliation. Usually, when they write, academics will state their exact position (Researcher, Doctoral Researcher, Associate Professor, Chief Engineer, Head of Department, Research Director...) and where they work. For example:

That's what it is supposed to look like.

But John? Nope, no affiliation anywhere, on anything he ever published. That's a pretty massive read flag. Research takes ressources: at the very least, time and access to database and documentation, even in social sciences in humanities. You may not need a lab, but you sure as hell need money and full access to JStore at least.

So I thought he was just one of these "I google therefore I research" kind of dude. But then, out of nowhere:

I am sorry. He has a WHAT.

2. I am sorry, a Doctorate from WHERE?

So. One thing to claim to be a researcher when you are just a professional yapper. Another to claim a DIPLOMA.

And not any diploma. A doctorate.

Let's pause. "Doctorate" is actually a really broad umbrella term of all doctoral-level degrees. The most famous (and most prestigious, for better and worse) is the PhD, but a PhD is technically just one of many Research Doctorate of, theoretically, the same level (cue this helpful reddit post). A second category of doctorates are the Applied Doctorates, and while there is Discourse on where they sit vis-a-vis PhD, the easiest is to consider that they are not research-oriented. They are hands-on, practice-oriented degrees. For example: you can practice medicine with an MD. You don't need a PhD. You can still call yourself a doctor, though.

Alright, so which of these does our friend Johnnie has? Or is currently enrolled in? And in which University?

You will notice that John does not go by "John Mac Ghlionn PhD" or even "Dr John Mac Ghlionn", when you just KNOW he is the sort of person that would but that shit everywhere. And no shade here, because I, for one, do put that shit everywhere. Maybe he is just currently enrolled in a program and has not graduated. Fair.

Since John does not list affiliation, I had to switch from academic to internet sleuth, and dig out this article:

But we learn that in 2021, John was a "PhD Scholar" in "Parkmore Institute". "PhD Scholar" is not a title I am sued to, but it's also not raising any red flag: ongoing PhD researchers can be "PhD students", "PhD fellows", "PhD researchers"... It varies from country to country and from institution to institution, so why not "PhD Scholar".

Let's check out the Parkmore Institute.

Ok, they are not a traditional university, but they appear to be more of a postgraduate institution: offering only higher level degrees, not undergrad courses. Once again, not necessarily a red flag. They are usually very heavily research focused, and embrace the "research" side of academia more than the "teaching" side. In Germany, the Max Planck Institutes are research-only institutions who deliver PhDs. They conduct cutting edge research, in part because their researchers rarely have to spend time teaching.

But that is NOT the Parkmore Institute. First of all, let's see what programs they offer:

None of them are legit.

And I mean, none of them are recognize as even Applied/Professional Doctorate by the National Science Foundation (US based). And while a PhD in Human sexuality would be perfectly valid, but I'm going to on a limb and say I have some serious doubts about "Bodymind Healing" as an academic field.

These are not legit academic degrees.

What they are, is an excellent money-making opportunity for anyone working at the Parkmore institute. Students will pay, at the very least:

And 60% of this goes to their " faculty mentor". The Parkmore institute provides no research fund, no desk or office space (they are entirely digital), no access to any resources or library, not even a Zoom account. There is also no mention of any timeline: how long a PhD take to complete? Who knows. 6 months ? A year ? 5 years? What are the requirements to graduate ? Who knows ! And I would need to pay $200 to get in touch with them, so I sure as fuck won't know any time soon!

But let's get back to our friend John. Remember that he stated, in that 2021 publication, he was a "PhD Scholar" at Parkmore ? Well that's a shame because Parkmore does not deliver PhDs. Ain't that a bitch.

ALSO. Parkmore helpfully has page with all their Doctoral Recipients! And guess who is NOT HERE ! That's right, our Johnnie !

How can this be ? Well, three possibilities:

John is still not done with a PhD. After 4 years ? In a crank university where I am pretty sure I can submit the first draft of a litt review and graduate ? Nah

John never completed the thing. Boo, that would mean that John is lying, when he says he has a doctorate. Bad, bad.

John did graduate, and obtained his doctorate in [scrolls back to check] psychosocial studies, and then was not put on the website or was withdrawn some time before today, as Parkmore institute ended their affiliation with him, as per this bit in their application form

A shame, really. If John had been affiliated with the Parkmore Institute, it would give a shred of legitimacy to anything he writes to anyone just skimming.

Now, I would love to get in touch with the Parkmore Institute and ask to see John's doctoral work, which they DO have, since the application for also has this very interesting section:

(definitely very legit, very normal).

But I am not sure how I would even phrase that request without transparently going

"hey, would love to see what bullshit research is being done over there, since one of your graduate decided to go all Handmaid's tale for the last 2 years".

If anyone feels like sending that email, I am begging you to keep me in the loop.

3. Back up, back up, what's up with that article?

Remember the article where he was listed as a "PhD Fellow"?

Well, about that... No. Welcome to the world of predatory publishing, one more cog in the Bullshit Academic ecosystem.

First: not at article. It's a "commentary". Could be worth something ia good journal, but still would not be a piece of research. But that is the least of its sins.

Its sins are being published in a journal called "Sociology and Criminology-Open Access", by a publisher called "Longdom". Longdom publishing has a bunch of journals on a lot o different fields, with the particularly of being predatory; they will publish absolutely anything you send them, as long as you pay their Article Processing Charges:

There are entire lists of Predatory journals on the web, you can find on here and another here , Longdom Publishing is in both.

This is how John can publish this last minute, Redbull-and-weed-induced essay in an actual journal, with an abstract that, I kid you not, finishes with "Please find the paper attached." He slapped together a shitty essay about people in India are poorer and therefore more likely to exhibit psychopathic traits and therefore engage in corruption, purely base on vibes. It does not even deserve be given any consideration, not even to be debunked. There is nothing to be debunked. This would be a failing grade for a 1st year intro class.

CONCLUSION

On the surface, John Mac Ghlionn is the poster boy of failed edgelords who really wish they were Jordan Peterson, but unfortunately are just Doug, the guy for 10th grade who failed the Literature class and decided it was because litterature was too woke today anyway.

Beneath the surface, John is a case study in Scam Academia, and the proof that no matter how bad actual academia is, Scam Academia can always get worse.

A quick checklist to go through whenever someone claims be a researcher, an academic, a fellow, a doctor, a PhD or anything of the sort:

What is their affiliation? Is this a legitimate organization?

Do they have a PhD? Another doctorate degree? From where?

Have they published ? Where is it published?

[sempermoi]

Rant about generative AI in education and in general under the cut because I'm worried and frustrated and I needed to write it out in a small essay:

So, context: I am a teacher in Belgium, Flanders. I am now teaching English (as a second language), but have also taught history and Dutch (as a native language). All in secondary education, ages 12-16.

More and more I see educational experts endorse ai being used in education and of course the most used tools are the free, generative ones. Today, one of the colleagues responsible for the IT of my school went to an educational lecture where they once again vouched for the use of ai.

Now their keyword is that it should always be used in a responsible manner, but the issue is... can it be?

1. Environmentally speaking, ai has been a nightmare. Not only does it have an alarming impact on emission levels, but also on the toxic waste that's left behind. Not to mention the scarcity of GPUs caused by the surge of ai in the past few years. Even sources that would vouch for ai have raised concerns about the impact it has on our collective health. sources: here, here and here

2. Then there's the issue with what the tools are trained on and this in multiple ways:

Many of the free tools that the public uses is trained on content available across the internet. However, it is at this point common knowledge (I'd hope) that most creators of the original content (writers, artists, other creative content creators, researchers, etc.) were never asked for permission and so it has all been stolen. Many social media platforms will often allow ai training on them without explicitly telling the user-base or will push it as the default setting and make it difficult for their user-base to opt out. Deviantart, for example, lost much of its reputation when it implemented such a policy. It had to backtrack in 2022 afterwards because of the overwhelming backlash. The problem is then that since the content has been ripped from their context and no longer made by a human, many governments therefore can no longer see it as copyrighted. Which, yes, luckily also means that ai users are legally often not allowed to pass off ai as 'their own creation'. Sources: here, here

Then there's the working of generative ai in general. As said before, it simply rips words or image parts from their original, nuanced context and then mesh it together without the user being able to accurately trace back where the info is coming from. A tool like ChatGPT is not a search engine, yet many people use it that way without realising it is not the same thing at all. More on the working of generative ai in detail. Because of how it works, it means there is always a chance for things to be biased and/or inaccurate. If a tool has been trained on social media sources (which ChatGPT for example is) then its responses can easily be skewed to the demographic it's been observing. Bias is an issue is most sources when doing research, but if you have the original source you also have the context of the source. Ai makes it that the original context is no longer clear to the user and so bias can be overlooked and go unnoticed much easier. Source: here

3. Something my colleague mentioned they said in the lecture is that ai tools can be used to help the learning of the students.

Let me start off by saying that I can understand why there is an appeal to ai when you do not know much about the issues I have already mentioned. I am very aware it is probably too late to fully stop the wave of ai tools being published.

There are certain uses to types of ai that can indeed help with accessibility. Such as text-to-voice or the other way around for people with disabilities (let's hope the voice was ethically begotten).

But many of the other uses mentioned in the lecture I have concerns with. They are to do with recognising learning, studying and wellbeing patterns of students. Not only do I not think it is really possible to data-fy the complexity of each and every single student you would have as they are still actively developing as a young person, this also poses privacy risks in case the data is ever compromised. Not to mention that ai is often still faulty and, as it is not a person, will often still make mistakes when faced with how unpredictable a human brain can be. We do not all follow predictable patterns.

The lecture stated that ai tools could help with neurodivergency 'issues'. Obviously I do not speak for others and this next part is purely personal opinion, but I do think it important to nuance this: as someone with auDHD, no ai-tool has been able to help me with my executive dysfunction in the long-term. At first, there is the novelty of the app or tool and I am very motivated. They are often in the form of over-elaborate to-do lists with scheduled alarms. And then the issue arises: the ai tries to train itself on my presented routine... except I don't have one. There is no routine to train itself on, because that is my very problem I am struggling with. Very quickly it always becomes clear that the ai doesn't understand this the way a human mind would. A professionally trained in psychology/therapy human mind. And all I was ever left with was the feeling of even more frustration.

In my opinion, what would help way more than any ai tool would be the funding of mental health care and making it that going to a therapist or psychiatrist or coach is covered by health care the way I only have to pay 5 euros to my doctor while my health care provider pays the rest. (In Belgium) This would make mental health care much more accessible and would have a greater impact than faulty ai tools.

4. It was also said that ai could help students with creative assignments and preparing for spoken interactions both in their native language as well as in the learning of a new one.

I wholeheartedly disagree. Creativity in its essence is about the person creating something from their own mind and putting the effort in to translate those ideas into their medium of choice. Stick figures on lined course paper are more creative than letting a tool like Midjourney generate an image based on stolen content. How are we teaching students to be creative when we allow them to not put a thought in what they want to say and let an ai do it for them?

And since many of these tools are also faulty and biased in their content, how could they accurately replace conversations with real people? Ai cannot fully understand the complexities of language and all the nuances of the contexts around it. Body language, word choice, tone, volume, regional differences, etc.

And as a language teacher, I can truly say there is nothing more frustrating than wanting to assess the writing level of my students, giving them a writing assignment where they need to express their opinion and write it in two tiny paragraphs... and getting an ai response back. Before anyone comes to me saying that my students may simply be very good at English. Indeed, but my current students are not. They are precious, but their English skills are very flawed. It is very easy to see when they wrote it or ChatGPT. It is not only frustrating to not being able to trust part of your students' honesty and knowing they learned nothing from the assignment cause you can't give any feedback; it is almost offensive that they think I wouldn't notice it.

5. Apparently, it was mentioned in the lecture that in schools where ai is banned currently, students are fearful that their jobs would be taken away by ai and that in schools where ai was allowed that students had much more positive interactions with technology.

First off, I was not able to see the source and data that this statement was based on. However, I personally cannot shake the feeling there's a data bias in there. Of course students will feel more positively towards ai if they're not told about all the concerns around it.

Secondly, the fact that in the lecture it was (reportedly) framed that being scared your job would disappear because of ai, was untrue is... infuriating. Because it already is becoming a reality. Let's not forget what partially caused the SAG-AFTRA strike in 2023. Corporations see an easy (read: cheap) way to get marketable content by using ai at the cost of the creative professionals. Unregulated ai use by businesses causing the loss of jobs for real-life humans, is very much a threat. Dismissing this is basically lying to young students.

6. My conclusion:

I am frustrated. It's clamoured that we, as teachers, should educate more about ai and it's responsible use. However, at the same time the many concerns and issues around most of the accessible ai tools are swept under the rug and not actively talked about.

I find the constant surging rise of generative ai everywhere very concerning and I can only hope that more people will start seeing it too.

Thank you for reading.