#EVM Machine

[teznews]

EVM से फर्जी वोट डाले जाते है.. BSP देश में अब कोई भी उपचुनाव नहीं लड़ेगी- मायावती

बसपा प्रमुख मायावती ने कहा पहले देश में बैलेट पेपर के जरिए चुनाव जीतने के लिए सत्ता का दुरुपयोग करके फर्जी वोट डाले जाते थे और अब तो EVM के जरिए भी ये कार्य किया जा रहा है, जो लोकतंत्र के लिए बहुत दुख और चिंता की बात है। देश में लोकसभा और राज्यों में विधानसभा चुनावों के साथ-साथ खासकर उपचुनावों में तो अब ये कार्य काफी खुलकर किया जा रहा है। लखनऊ -उपचुनाव नहीं लड़ने के फैसले का ऐलान करते हुए मायावती…

[rightnewshindi]

99 फीसदी तक चार्ज थी EVM मशीन, फिर भी हार गए कांग्रेस उम्मीदवार; जानें क्या बोले निर्वाचन आयोग के सूत्र

Delhi News: निर्वाचन आयोग के सूत्रों ने मंगलवार को कांग्रेस नेताओं के उन दावों को खारिज कर दिया जिसमें उन्होंने हरियाणा की कुछ सीटों पर ईवीएम से कथित छेड़छाड़ की बात कही थी। कांग्रेस ने दावा किया था मशीनों में बैट्री चार्ज की अलग-अलग स्थिति के कारण अलग-अलग नतीजे आए। कांग्रेस नेताओं ने दावा किया कि हिसार, महेंद्रगढ़ और पानीपत जिलों से ईवीएम को लेकर शिकायतें आई हैं। जिन ईवीएम की बैट्री 99 फीसदी…

[healthtips9990]

Unveiling the Shadow: EVM Hacks and the Integrity of Indian Elections

Unveiling the Shadow: EVM Hacks and the Integrity of Indian Elections India, the world’s largest democracy, takes pride in its electoral process, which is considered one of the most robust and transparent in the world. However, in recent years, concerns have been raised about the integrity of Indian elections, particularly regarding the security of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs). EVMs are…

[themediaflair]

Electronic Voting Machine (EVM): an Indian account

Voting: an entry gate of Democracy

Electronic voting is the standard means of conducting elections using Electronic Voting Machines (EVM). Voting technologies have a long history. In the United States, mechanical lever voting machines were first used for elections in 1892 and were commonly used in U.S. elections until the 1990s. Electronic technologies began to appear in the 1960s with punch card counting machines. In the following decades, technologies such as DRE voting machines, ballot scanning machines and Internet voting began to appear.

Through the 1990s and the first decade of the new millennium, an increasing number of countries around the world also started to adopt these technologies. Several countries have tried electronic approaches and stopped because of difficulties or concerns about security and reliability.

Finland: Trialed in 2008; Review in 2016-17 concluded against internet voting – risks outweigh benefits, Germany: Trialed in 2005, but court found it unconstitutional in 2009, Netherlands: Discontinued 2007, Japan: No municipal governments use electronic voting – Last city stopped electronic voting in 2018. Other countries such as Australia, Spain, Sweden and the UK do not use electoral voting in political elections.

Also, electronic voting requires capital spending every few years to update equipment, as well as annual spending for maintenance, security, and supplies. If it works well, its speed can be an advantage where many contests are on each ballot. Hand-counting is more feasible in parliamentary systems where each level of government is elected at different times, and only one contest is on each ballot, for the national or regional member of parliament, or for a local council member.

[dencyemily]

VET's Rally: Analyzing the Momentum - Sustainable or a Short-Term Surge?

In a notable market movement, VeChain (VET) has surged impressively, gaining attention after trading at $0.02801, and subsequently experiencing a remarkable 70% increase to reach a peak of $0.04864. This surge aligns with a bullish breakout from a descending triangle pattern on CryptoBusy's VeChain daily price chart, indicating robust buying pressure and potentially signaling the initiation of a new uptrend.

The breakout is distinguished by a significant green candlestick, showcasing strong buying activity. This development is further supported by substantial trading volume, reaching 51.121 billion units during the breakout, affirming the market's robust bullish momentum.

The analysis identifies a near-term resistance level at $0.04419 USDT, while potential support levels lie at $0.02600 USDT and $0.02519 USDT, providing a safety net for potential market downturns.

Highlighted by three yellow arrows on the chart, crucial moments are emphasized. The first arrow marks the commencement of an upward trend, the second points to the breakout, and the third underscores the corresponding high volume, collectively reinforcing the bullish outlook on the chart.

Beyond the technical breakout signals, VeChain has fortified its position with fundamental advancements. The platform's compatibility with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) has been enhanced, making it more attractive to enterprises by improving scalability and sustainability, enabling seamless movement of digital assets across blockchains.

Market response to VeChain's developments has been positive, with VET's price hovering around $0.048715 at the time of reporting, reflecting a substantial 31.06% uptick in the past day. This positive response underscores the market's confidence in VeChain's trajectory and its ability to navigate the dynamic cryptocurrency landscape.

The convergence of technical breakout signals and positive fundamental developments paints a promising picture for VeChain. As the platform continues to evolve, it solidifies its standing as a key player in the blockchain space. VeChain's enterprise-friendly features and the enthusiastic market response position it favorably for continued growth, capturing the attention of investors and enthusiasts alike in the dynamic cryptocurrency landscape.

[empresa-journal]

Can Ontology Gas (ONG) make money from a Virtual Machine?

Interestingly, the builders of the Ontology blockchain think they can make money by selling access to their Ethereum Virtual Machine as Ontology Gas (ONG) tokens. A virtual machine is the digital computer that runs a blockchain. For example, the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Gas refers to the fees users pay a virtual machine to conduct transactions and perform tasks on a blockchain. For…

[sivavakkiyar]

On Monday, research conducted by a poll watchdog Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) revealed discrepancies in vote counts in the Lok Sabha elections conducted in the year 2024.

According to the report, titled “Discrepancies between the votes cast and the votes counted in the 2024 Lok Sabha election: Multiple Perspectives” there were problems in 362 parliamentary constituencies where 554,598 votes counted were less than the actual votes cast.

The report continued that in 176 constituencies, the total votes were counted 35,093 more than the actual votes. It aimed to highlight the differences between the votes recorded by electronic voting machines (EVMs) and the counts reported by the Election Commission of India (ECI) for the 2024 general elections.

The report has highlighted significant discrepancies in as many as 538 constituencies, except Amreli, Attingal, Lakshadweep, and Dadra Nagar Haveli and Daman Diu. Surat seat did not have any contest. “Hence the total discrepancies in 538 PCs are 5,89,691,” reads the report.

The ElCI has not given a reasonable explanation for announcing the results of the election before releasing final and accurate vote count data. Concerns are; disparities in votes credited based on EVM, increased voter turnout, non-declaration of the actual number of votes polled, unreasonable delay in releasing vote data, and data being pulled down from the ECI website, the ADR report read.

It also said that due to ECI’s failure to address these irregularities during the 2019 & 2024 Lok Sabha elections, voters have developed concerns. These apprehensions must be seriously addressed and put to rest,” it said.

“In order to uphold the voter’s confidence, it is necessary that the ECI should immediately disclose on its website scanned legible copies of Form 17C Part- I (Account of Votes Recorded) of all polling stations which contains the authenticated figures for votes polled, within 48hours of the close of polling,” the report read.

[woy12098w]

Discussion on the rationality of BitPower mechanism

Introduction With the development of blockchain technology, decentralized finance (DeFi) as a new financial model has gradually attracted widespread attention. As a member of the DeFi field, BitPower has demonstrated the potential of decentralized finance through its unique smart contract mechanism, income structure and security measures. This article will explore the rationality of BitPower mechanism and analyze its advantages in security, profitability and sustainability.

Security of smart contracts The core of BitPower lies in its smart contracts, which are deployed on the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) and based on TRC20 and ERC20 standards. The code of these smart contracts is open source, ensuring the transparency and credibility of the system. Due to the immutability of smart contracts, they cannot be modified or deleted once deployed, which greatly improves the security and stability of the system. In addition, BitPower Loop adopts a completely decentralized operation mode, without centralized administrators or owners, which means that no one can unilaterally change the system rules, thus avoiding human intervention and operational risks.

Rationality of income structure BitPower's income structure is cleverly designed to encourage users to get returns by providing liquidity. Users can provide liquidity according to different time periods and obtain corresponding yields. For example, the annualized yields of 1 day, 7 days, 14 days and 28 days are 429%, 773%, 1065% and 1638% respectively. This structure not only encourages users to participate in short-term investment, but also provides considerable returns for long-term investment. At the same time, the introduction of the compound interest mechanism further enhances the observability of the returns, so that the user's investment returns can grow significantly over time.

Sustainability of the promotion mechanism BitPower's promotion mechanism aims to expand the user base by inviting new users to join, thereby enhancing the liquidity and stability of the system. Each user can become a project initiator, invite new users to join through an invitation link, and receive corresponding referral rewards. The referral reward varies according to the level of the referral, ranging from 20% of the first-generation friends to 1% of the 17th-generation friends. This hierarchical referral reward mechanism not only encourages users to actively promote, but also ensures the long-term sustainable development of the system.

Decentralized governance structure BitPower's decentralized governance structure is another important manifestation of the rationality of its mechanism. The system has no centralized manager, and all participants are equal in rules and mechanisms. This decentralized governance structure ensures the fairness and transparency of the system and avoids possible corruption and injustice in the centralized system. At the same time, decentralized governance also enhances the resilience of the system, enabling it to better cope with external attacks and internal problems.

Rationality of the economic model BitPower's economic model is reasonably designed and can effectively balance the benefits and risks of the system. Users' benefits mainly come from liquidity provision and recommendation rewards. This income structure avoids high-risk models such as Ponzi schemes while maintaining high returns. In addition, BitPower also automatically executes reward distribution through smart contracts, reducing the risks and errors of human operations and improving the efficiency and reliability of the system.

Summary Through the analysis of the BitPower mechanism, it can be seen that it has significant advantages in security, profitability and sustainability. The immutability of smart contracts and the decentralized governance structure ensure the security and fairness of the system; the reasonable income structure and promotion mechanism provide users with considerable returns while enhancing the liquidity and stability of the system; the design of the economic model effectively balances benefits and risks. In summary, BitPower's mechanism is highly reasonable and feasible in the current DeFi field, providing a powerful example for the development of decentralized finance.

Future Outlook With the continuous development of blockchain technology and DeFi ecology, BitPower is expected to play a greater role in the future. By continuously optimizing smart contracts and improving user experience, BitPower can attract more users to join and further expand its influence and market share. At the same time, with the introduction of more innovative mechanisms, BitPower is expected to make more breakthroughs in the field of decentralized finance and provide users with richer and more diverse financial services.

In short, as a decentralized financial platform, BitPower's reasonable mechanism design not only ensures the security and stability of the system, but also provides users with generous returns and continuous incentives. It is an important case worthy of attention and research in the DeFi field.

[alice12awc]

Discussion on the rationality of BitPower mechanism

Introduction With the development of blockchain technology, decentralized finance (DeFi) as a new financial model has gradually attracted widespread attention. As a member of the DeFi field, BitPower has demonstrated the potential of decentralized finance through its unique smart contract mechanism, income structure and security measures. This article will explore the rationality of BitPower mechanism and analyze its advantages in security, profitability and sustainability.

Security of smart contracts The core of BitPower lies in its smart contracts, which are deployed on the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) and based on TRC20 and ERC20 standards. The code of these smart contracts is open source, ensuring the transparency and credibility of the system. Due to the immutability of smart contracts, they cannot be modified or deleted once deployed, which greatly improves the security and stability of the system. In addition, BitPower Loop adopts a completely decentralized operation mode, without centralized administrators or owners, which means that no one can unilaterally change the system rules, thus avoiding human intervention and operational risks.

Rationality of income structure BitPower's income structure is cleverly designed to encourage users to get returns by providing liquidity. Users can provide liquidity according to different time periods and obtain corresponding yields. For example, the annualized yields of 1 day, 7 days, 14 days and 28 days are 429%, 773%, 1065% and 1638% respectively. This structure not only encourages users to participate in short-term investment, but also provides considerable returns for long-term investment. At the same time, the introduction of the compound interest mechanism further enhances the observability of the returns, so that the user's investment returns can grow significantly over time.

Sustainability of the promotion mechanism BitPower's promotion mechanism aims to expand the user base by inviting new users to join, thereby enhancing the liquidity and stability of the system. Each user can become a project initiator, invite new users to join through an invitation link, and receive corresponding referral rewards. The referral reward varies according to the level of the referral, ranging from 20% of the first-generation friends to 1% of the 17th-generation friends. This hierarchical referral reward mechanism not only encourages users to actively promote, but also ensures the long-term sustainable development of the system.

Decentralized governance structure BitPower's decentralized governance structure is another important manifestation of the rationality of its mechanism. The system has no centralized manager, and all participants are equal in rules and mechanisms. This decentralized governance structure ensures the fairness and transparency of the system and avoids possible corruption and injustice in the centralized system. At the same time, decentralized governance also enhances the resilience of the system, enabling it to better cope with external attacks and internal problems.

Rationality of the economic model BitPower's economic model is reasonably designed and can effectively balance the benefits and risks of the system. Users' benefits mainly come from liquidity provision and recommendation rewards. This income structure avoids high-risk models such as Ponzi schemes while maintaining high returns. In addition, BitPower also automatically executes reward distribution through smart contracts, reducing the risks and errors of human operations and improving the efficiency and reliability of the system.

Summary Through the analysis of the BitPower mechanism, it can be seen that it has significant advantages in security, profitability and sustainability. The immutability of smart contracts and the decentralized governance structure ensure the security and fairness of the system; the reasonable income structure and promotion mechanism provide users with considerable returns while enhancing the liquidity and stability of the system; the design of the economic model effectively balances benefits and risks. In summary, BitPower's mechanism is highly reasonable and feasible in the current DeFi field, providing a powerful example for the development of decentralized finance.

Future Outlook With the continuous development of blockchain technology and DeFi ecology, BitPower is expected to play a greater role in the future. By continuously optimizing smart contracts and improving user experience, BitPower can attract more users to join and further expand its influence and market share. At the same time, with the introduction of more innovative mechanisms, BitPower is expected to make more breakthroughs in the field of decentralized finance and provide users with richer and more diverse financial services.

In short, as a decentralized financial platform, BitPower's reasonable mechanism design not only ensures the security and stability of the system, but also provides users with generous returns and continuous incentives. It is an important case worthy of attention and research in the DeFi field.

[tokenlauncher]

Solana vs. Ethereum: Why Solana Takes the Lead in 2024

The blockchain space has witnessed remarkable evolution over the past decade, and among the contenders for dominance in the realm of smart contracts and decentralized applications (dApps), Ethereum and Solana have emerged as two prominent players. Both networks have carved out significant niches, but as we advance into 2024, Solana is increasingly making a case for itself as the leader in the blockchain ecosystem. In this blog, we’ll delve into the reasons why Solana is gaining traction over Ethereum, focusing on aspects such as scalability, transaction costs, and the burgeoning opportunities for token creation.

The Ethereum Legacy

Ethereum, launched in 2015 by Vitalik Buterin, has been a pioneer in the blockchain space, introducing the world to the concept of smart contracts and decentralized applications. Its pioneering spirit earned it the title of the leading platform for building dApps and issuing tokens. Ethereum’s native token, ETH, has become synonymous with blockchain innovation, and the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) has set a standard for interoperability and developer ease.

However, Ethereum’s growth has not been without its challenges. The network has faced issues related to scalability, high transaction fees, and slower transaction speeds, particularly during periods of high demand. These limitations have become increasingly apparent as the number of users and applications on the Ethereum network has surged.

The Rise of Solana

Solana, founded in 2017 by Anatoly Yakovenko, has quickly emerged as a formidable competitor to Ethereum. Solana’s promise lies in its ability to address some of the critical issues that have plagued Ethereum, offering a unique approach to blockchain technology that emphasizes speed, scalability, and cost-efficiency.

1. Scalability and Speed

One of the most significant advantages that Solana offers is its impressive scalability. Solana’s unique consensus mechanism, Proof of History (PoH), works in conjunction with Proof of Stake (PoS) to achieve high throughput and low latency. This allows Solana to process thousands of transactions per second (TPS), a stark contrast to Ethereum’s current capacity, which handles around 30 TPS.

PoH is essentially a cryptographic time-stamping mechanism that orders transactions and ensures the network’s integrity without requiring extensive computational work. This results in faster block times and a more efficient network overall. For developers and users, this means significantly reduced transaction times and enhanced user experiences, making Solana an attractive platform for high-frequency trading and real-time applications.

2. Cost Efficiency

Transaction fees on Ethereum have been a notorious pain point for users. During periods of network congestion, fees can soar to exorbitant levels, which can be a significant barrier for both developers and end-users. In contrast, Solana has been designed to minimize transaction costs. With its high throughput and efficient consensus mechanisms, Solana can offer transactions at a fraction of the cost compared to Ethereum.

This cost efficiency is a game-changer for the broader adoption of blockchain technology. Lower transaction fees mean that small-scale transactions become viable, encouraging the growth of microtransactions and expanding the use cases for blockchain applications.

Token Creation on Solana vs. Ethereum

The ability to create and manage tokens is a crucial aspect of any blockchain platform, and both Ethereum and Solana offer robust frameworks for token creation.

Ethereum’s ERC-20 and ERC-721 Standards

Ethereum’s dominance in token creation is largely attributed to its ERC-20 and ERC-721 standards. The ERC-20 standard has become the go-to protocol for fungible tokens, while ERC-721 introduced the concept of non-fungible tokens (NFTs). These standards have been widely adopted, and many successful projects have been built on Ethereum using these protocols.

However, Ethereum’s token creation process can sometimes be hindered by its scalability issues. High gas fees and slower transaction times can affect the efficiency of token issuance and management.

Solana’s SPL Tokens

Solana’s token creation ecosystem is streamlined through its SPL (Solana Program Library) token standard. SPL tokens offer a more efficient alternative to Ethereum’s ERC standards. They benefit from Solana’s high throughput and low transaction costs, making token creation and transactions more cost-effective and faster.

Additionally, Solana’s SPL token framework supports a wide range of functionalities, from simple fungible tokens to complex assets. This flexibility allows developers to leverage Solana’s capabilities to build innovative token-based applications without worrying about prohibitive fees or slow transaction times.

The Ecosystem and Developer Experience

A thriving ecosystem and developer support are critical for the success of any blockchain platform. Ethereum has established a robust ecosystem with numerous tools, libraries, and a strong developer community. However, as the Ethereum network has grown, so have its complexities, which can pose challenges for new developers.

Solana, on the other hand, has made significant strides in building a developer-friendly ecosystem. Its focus on speed and efficiency extends to its developer tools and resources. Solana provides comprehensive documentation, developer support, and a growing suite of tools designed to simplify the development process. This user-centric approach has fostered an enthusiastic community of developers and entrepreneurs eager to build on the Solana blockchain.

Adoption and Real-World Use Cases

The real-world application of blockchain technology is a crucial factor in determining a platform’s long-term viability. Ethereum has seen extensive adoption across various industries, including finance, gaming, and art. Its established presence in the NFT space and DeFi (Decentralized Finance) sector speaks to its influence and reach.

Solana, while newer, has also made significant inroads into real-world applications. Its high performance and low costs have attracted a range of projects, from decentralized finance platforms to NFT marketplaces. Solana’s ability to handle high transaction volumes efficiently makes it an appealing choice for applications requiring rapid and cost-effective transaction processing.

Future Prospects

Also We done tons of research and found amazing platform, Solana Launcher, Here you can generate your own memecoins tokens on solana in just less than three seconds without any coding knowledge. Just visit that platform, If you have any daubt Feel Free to ask!!!

As we move further into 2024, Solana’s potential to lead the blockchain space continues to grow. Its innovative approach to scalability, cost efficiency, and token creation positions it as a compelling alternative to Ethereum. While Ethereum remains a powerful and influential platform, Solana’s advantages in transaction speed and costs, coupled with its developer-friendly ecosystem, make it a strong contender for the future of blockchain technology.

Both Ethereum and Solana are likely to continue evolving and influencing the blockchain landscape. However, Solana’s advancements and practical solutions to some of the inherent challenges faced by Ethereum give it a distinct edge as we look towards the future of decentralized applications and token creation.

In conclusion, Solana’s impressive scalability, cost efficiency, and developer-friendly environment have positioned it as a leading force in the blockchain space. For those looking to leverage blockchain technology in 2024 and beyond, Solana offers a promising alternative that addresses many of the limitations of its predecessors, paving the way for a new era of innovation and growth in the decentralized world.

[allthebrazilianpolitics]

Bolsonaro's troubles deepen: Hacker claims former prez offered him 'blank cheque' to tamper with voting machine

Brazil's former President Jair Bolsonaro has been accused of paying a hacker to tamper with electronic voting machines (EVM). Appearing before a congressional inquiry on Thursday, a Brazilian hacker has testified that Bolsonaro had asked him to manipulate an EVM.

Reportedly, this was intended to serve as proof to the former president's claims that the Brazil's electoral system was vulnerable to fraud during the presidential campaign held last year.

The hacker in question, computer programmer Walter Delgatti, alleged that he was summoned for a meeting with then-President Bolsonaro in August. 

As per Delgatti, his meeting with Jair Bolsonaro was set up by right-wing lawmaker Carla Zambelli, who paid the hacker 40,000 reais (USD 8,000) for his services.

Continue reading.

[daaft-prick-69]

General elections in India 2024 - interesting facts:

1. Number of voters - 960 million

2. Number of polling stations - 1.05 million

3. Number of officials and security staff deployed - 15 million

4. Number of EVMs (Electronic voting machines) - 5.5 million

5. Number of male voters - 490 million

6. Number of female voters - 470 million

[imperiumallaboveall]

Watch "tinyML Talks: SRAM based In-Memory Computing for Energy-Efficient AI Inference" on YouTube

Evm gpt protocol artificial intelligence Prime operations for Jarvis Prime AI and Cortana Prime AI only

SRAM ipu dpu to cpu fiber satellite federated dpu ipu gpu ipu finished preproduction. Loading for markup and review from Samsung Galaxy platform apple Iphone cloud.

Platform all ecosystem management system AI for features testing marketing campaign generation and joint launch with features os based iteration for hardware critical path.

Onprem distribution preplanning roadmap to artificial intelligence neutral network processing automation for enhancement and basic building blocks Watson prime ai consulting Candice Kim solution technology management system engine Kevin Kim management system AI engine ai from virtual machines for kernels cloud cloud cloud cloud command center for onprem private architecture mainframe.

[alya-smith]

BEP20 Token Development Cost: What You Need to Know

The Binance Smart Chain (BSC) has emerged as a leading blockchain platform for decentralized applications and crypto tokens, thanks to its speed, low transaction costs, and compatibility with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). One of the most popular token standards on BSC is BEP20, which offers a versatile framework for creating tokens. However, before embarking on your BEP20 token development journey, it's crucial to understand the costs involved. This blog explores the key factors affecting BEP20 token development costs and provides insights to help you plan effectively.

Understanding BEP20 Tokens

The BEP20 standard is akin to Ethereum’s ERC20, providing developers with a robust structure for creating tokens. BEP20 tokens can represent anything from stablecoins and utility tokens to governance tokens and more. Their compatibility with wallets, exchanges, and decentralized apps (dApps) makes them an excellent choice for blockchain projects.

Factors Influencing BEP20 Token Development Costs

Token Features and Complexity

Basic tokens with simple functions like transferring and minting are more affordable to create.

Advanced features, such as staking, governance mechanisms, and deflationary mechanisms, increase the cost due to the complexity of coding and testing.

Smart Contract Development

Writing a secure and functional smart contract is a crucial aspect of BEP20 token development.

Costs rise if you require additional functionalities, rigorous audits, or custom contract structures.

Token Supply and Customization

Deciding on the total supply, decimals, and minting/burning capabilities influences the development cost.

Unique requirements for token customization may require more coding, increasing costs.

Development Team

Hiring experienced blockchain developers comes at a higher cost but ensures quality and security.

Offshore or freelance developers may offer cost-effective solutions, but vet their expertise carefully.

Blockchain Development Tools

Tools like Truffle, Remix, or hardhat can reduce costs by streamlining development.

Some tools may have licensing fees, especially if you're using enterprise-grade solutions.

Token Testing and Deployment

Rigorous testing is essential to ensure the token functions as intended and is free from vulnerabilities.

Gas fees for deploying the token on the Binance Smart Chain also contribute to the overall cost.

Post-Development Services

Services like marketing, listing on exchanges, and integrating tokens into wallets or dApps are additional expenses.

Estimated Cost of BEP20 Token Development

The cost of developing a BEP20 token can vary significantly depending on your project requirements:

Basic Token: For a simple token with basic functionality, development costs can range between $2,000 and $5,000.

Advanced Token: Tokens with custom features or additional security measures may cost between $7,000 and $15,000.

End-to-End Services: If you opt for complete development, testing, deployment, and marketing, costs can exceed $20,000, depending on the scope.

These figures are estimates and may fluctuate based on your chosen development team, location, and specific needs.

Reducing BEP20 Token Development Costs

If you're looking to minimize expenses while maintaining quality, consider these strategies:

Use Token Generators

You can easily and for cheaper use platforms such as Binance Smart Chain’s BEP20 token generator tools.

Hire a Reliable Blockchain Development Partner

Do not embark on a project with your inexperienced developers or hire a company that has never undertaken such a project before to avoid wasting your resources.

Optimize Features

Start with having an MVT and then increment on the features of the project in the future.

Focus on Testing

It reduces risks that could lead to a variety of issues and expensive adjustments after the token’s release.

Why Choose Binance Smart Chain?

BSC is an efficient platform to launch BEP20 tokens own tokens as they are less expensive. It offers:

Low Transaction Fees: While staking on Ethereum is considerably cheaper than on other blockchains, BSC has even lower transaction costs, which is especially important for startups.

High Speed: Super fast block time makes token transactions easy and fast as well as interactions with dApps.

EVM Compatibility: The competency of easily migrating Ethereum based projects to Builder using minimal changes.

Conclusion

The cost of BEP20 token development can range from moderate depending on the token specifics, level of the development team, and other services may be needed after token launch. Understanding these elements, you can budget and provide a successful token launch.

In any of these use cases, whether you’re intending to launch a token related to a DeFi project, a utility token, or any other conceptualisation relating to blockchain, Binance Smart Chain and BEP20 tokens give a strong ground. Working with an experienced blockchain development company guarantees that your project is free from vulnerabilities, is easily scalable and ready for success.

[dencyemily]

Polygon Takes Center Stage in 2023 Developer Landscape According to ElectricCapital Report

Polygon, the blockchain development powerhouse, takes the lead in ElectricCapital's 2023 Developer Report, showcasing the dominance of its Proof-of-Stake (PoS) protocol. The report, based on an extensive analysis of 485 million code commits across 818,000 open-source repositories, positions Polygon's PoS as the preferred choice for first-time developers. Notably second only to Ethereum, Polygon's appeal lies in its exceptional speed, cost-effectiveness, and seamless integration with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). The report sheds light on the pivotal role played by Polygon zkEVM in shaping the future of blockchain development.

The report heralds a new era for multichain developers, with 30% actively supporting more than one blockchain. Polygon PoS emerges as a cross-pollinator, fostering collaboration with Ethereum and defining the multichain development landscape. Despite an overall decline in developer numbers, the report introduces a positive narrative with the rise of 22,000 monthly active developers, signifying a widespread and distributed approach to blockchain development.

As 2024 unfolds, the stage is set for increased developer activity, innovation, and growth within the blockchain ecosystem, thanks to the insights provided by ElectricCapital's Developer Report.

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] GG News Bureau New Delhi, 23rd November.: With the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) headed for a stunning rout in the Maharashtra Assembly elections, Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut raised questions about the integrity of the election process, alleging foul play and calling for a return to ballot paper voting. As of 11:30 am, the ruling Mahayuti coalition, comprising the BJP, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena faction, and the Ajit Pawar-led NCP, was leading in 220 of the state’s 288 constituencies, while the MVA struggled with projections of just 56 seats. Aaditya Thackeray, seen as a key figure in the UBT faction, was trailing Milind Deora of the rival Shinde-led Shiv Sena by 600 votes. “There is definitely something amiss. This cannot be the people’s verdict,” Raut thundered, alleging that “money machines” influenced results across constituencies. He further questioned the unprecedented confidence displayed by Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, who had earlier claimed he would resign if any of his MLAs lost. Raut insisted that the results implied dishonesty in the process, declaring that “the voters of this state are not dishonest.” He reiterated his demand for elections to be re-held using ballot papers, dismissing electronic voting machines (EVMs) as unreliable. BJP Hits Back The BJP dismissed Raut’s accusations as baseless. National Spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla slammed the Shiv Sena (UBT) leader, accusing him of “mental bankruptcy.” Poonawalla pointed out the opposition’s selective skepticism, stating, “The results in Wayanad are fine because Priyanka Gandhi Vadra is winning there. But suddenly, EVMs are faulty in Maharashtra and Haryana.” The Mahayuti’s commanding lead—Eknath Shinde’s faction leading in 54 seats, close to its 2019 performance, and the BJP ahead in 125 constituencies—has left the MVA coalition grappling with a political reality check. As allegations and counter-allegations dominate the post-election discourse, the ruling coalition is on track for a historic mandate, leaving opposition leaders to reflect on their strategies amidst a fractured state polity.   The post Something Amiss, Can’t Be People’s Verdict”: Sanjay Raut on Maharashtra Election Results appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link