#Durham report
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
liberalsarecool · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Durham Report exposes no crimes, just Republicans wasting time and money.
The witch hunt was always them.
243 notes · View notes
reality-detective · 1 year ago
Text
Kash Patel says the fake news is being forced to report that President Trump is innocent as a result of the Durham report & they are “injecting that into the media narrative for the first time to an audience that has never really heard that.” 🤔
104 notes · View notes
bighermie · 1 year ago
Link
77 notes · View notes
trutown-the-bard · 1 year ago
Text
I think the Durham Report would mean more to me if Congress actually had the guts to do something about it.
9 notes · View notes
gusty-wind · 1 year ago
Photo
Tumblr media
7 notes · View notes
aspiringbelle · 1 year ago
Text
Well, it's finally out. The Russian election interference myth has been staked through the heart.
A lot of people are owed apologies. All the journalists who got it right (Mark Ames, Michael Tracey, Consortium News, The Grayzone, Ted Rall) deserve to be heard. The ones who got it wrong deserve to be ignored.
And I bet Trump is happy...though fortunately for the sake of Justice, Fani Wilkes, Letitia James, and E. Jean Carroll are helping him face justice for his real crimes.
Alas, Durham pulled his punches. No charges against Robby Mook or Alexandra Chalupa. No charges against Christopher Steele. No charges against the Ukrainians who did interfere. No charges against Stefan Halper. No charges against Dimitri Alperovitch and Crowdstrike.
Still, the truth is out.
And, with Russian interference debunked, Russian doping debunked, and Russian hacking debunked, it's time we took a long hard look at all the sanctions from Browder's bill of attainder to the recent attempts to punish Russia for protecting the Donbass.
5 notes · View notes
jonostroveart · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Puffed Pastry
2 notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media
https://www.justice.gov/storage/durhamreport.pdf
4 notes · View notes
gettothestabbing · 1 year ago
Link
“Upon receipt of unevaluated intelligence information from Australia, the FBI swiftly opened the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. In particular, at the direction of Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Deputy Assistant Director for Counterintelligence Peter Strzok opened Crossfire Hurricane immediately. Strzok, at a minimum, had pronounced hostile feelings toward Trump.”
“The matter was opened as a full investigation without ever having spoken to the persons who provided the information. Further, the FBI did so without (i) any significant review of its own intelligence databases, (ii) collection and examination of any relevant intelligence from other U.S. intelligence entities, (iii) interviews of witnesses essential to understand the raw information it had received or (iv) using any of the standard analytical tools typicallv employed by the FBI in evaluating raw intelligence,” the report concluded.
“Had it done so … the FBI would have learned that their own experienced Russia analysts had no information about Trump being involved with Russian leadership officials, nor were others in sensitive positions at the CIA, the NSA, and the Department of State aware of such evidence concerning the subject. In addition, FBI records prepared by Strzok in February and March 2017 show that at the time of the opening of Crossfire Hurricane, the FBI had no information in its holdings indicating that at any time during the campaign anyone in the Trump campaign had been in contact with any Russian intelligence officials,” it said.
“In the eighteen months leading up to the 2016 election, the FBI was required to deal with a number of proposed investigations that had the potential of affecting the election. In each of those instances, the FBI moved with considerable caution. In one such matter… FBI Headquarters and Department officials required defensive briefings to be provided to Clinton and other officials or candidates who appeared to be the targets of foreign interference,” it said. “In another, the FBI elected to end an investigation after one of its longtime and valuable CHSs went beyond what was authorized and made an improper and possibly illegal financial contribution to the Clinton campaign on behalf of a foreign entity as a precursor to a much larger donation being contemplated.”
“And in a third, the Clinton Foundation matter, both senior FBI and Department officials placed restrictions on how those matters were to be handled such that essentially no investigative activities occurred for months leading up to the election. These examples are also markedly different from the FBI’s actions with respect to other highly significant intelligence it received from a trusted foreign source pointing to a Clinton campaign plan to vilify Trump by tying him to Vladimir Putin so as to divert attention from her own concerns relating to her use of a private email server,” it said.
“Within days after opening Crossfire Hurricane, the FBI opened full investigations on four members of the Trump campaign team: George Papadopoulos, Carter Page, Paul Manafort, and Michael Flynn. No defensive briefing was provided to Trump or anyone in the campaign concerning the information received from Australia that suggested there might be some type of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians, either prior to or after these investigations were opened. Instead, the FBI began working on requests for the use of FISA authorities against Page and Papadopoulos.”
“Our investigation determined that the Crossfire Hurricane investigators did not and could not corroborate any of the substantive allegations contained in the Steele reporting. Nor was Steele able to produce corroboration for any of the reported allegations, even after being offered $1 million or more by the FBI for such corroboration.
“The FBI learned that Steele relied primarily on a U.S.-based Russian national, Igor Danchenko, to collect information that ultimately formed the core allegations found in the reports. Specifically, our investigation discovered that Danchenko himself had told another person that he (Danchenko) was responsible for 80% of the ‘intel’ and 50% of the analysis contained in the Steele Dossier.”
“In December 2016, the FBI identified Danchenko as Steele’s primary sub-source. Danchenko agreed to meet with the FBI and, under the protection of an immunity letter… the FBI conducted multiple interviews of Danchenko regarding, among other things, the information he provided to Steele,” it said. “Danchenko was unable to provide any corroborating evidence to support the Steele allegations, and further, described his interactions with his sub-sources as ‘rumor and speculation’ and conversations of a casual nature. Significant parts of what Danchenko told the FBI were inconsistent with what Steele told the FBI during his prior interviews in October 2016 and September 2017. At no time, however, was the FISC informed of these inconsistencies. Moreover, notwithstanding the repeated assertions in the Page FISA applications that Steele’s primary sub-source was based in Russia, Danchenko for many years had lived in the Washington, D.C. area.”
“The FBI knew in January 2017 that Danchenko had been the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation from 2009 to 2011. In late 2008, while Danchenko was employed by the Brookings Institution, he engaged two fellow employees about whether one of the employees might be willing or able in the future to provide classified information in exchange for money. According to one employee, Danchenko believed that he (the employee might be following a mentor into the incoming Obama administration and have access to classified information. During this exchange, Danchenko informed the employee that he had access to people who were willing to pay for classified information.”
“The FBI converted its investigation into a full investigation after learning that Danchenko (i) had been identified as an associate of two FBI counterintelligence subjects and (ii) had previous contact with the Russian Embassy and known Russian intelligence officers… at that earlier time, Agents had interviewed several former colleagues of Danchenko who raised concerns about Danchenko’s potential involvement with Russian intelligence. For example, one such colleague, who had interned at a U.S. intelligence agency, informed the Office that Danchenko frequently inquired about that person’s knowledge of a specific Russian military matter.”
You can read the report here.
1 note · View note
commonsensecommentary · 1 year ago
Text
“Politicians can (and do) lie as part of their jobs; prosecutors and police cannot be permitted to do so. When the cops become the criminals, the checks and balances of our Constitutional system of government crash and burn.”
82 notes · View notes
hayquetenerpatience · 9 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
1 note · View note
cadavidson · 1 year ago
Text
Branco Cartoons: Durham Report Falls on Deaf Ears
Branco Cartoons: Durham Report Falls on Deaf Ears A.F. Branco Cartoon – The Hearing Impaired The Durham Report proves the media, FBI, and the entire left-wing controlled deep state along with Hillary and Obama, collaborated in a coup against President Trump. Political cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2023. DONATE to A.F.Branco Cartoons – Tips accepted and appreciated – $1.00 – $5.00 – $25.00 – $50.00 –…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
bighermie · 1 year ago
Link
47 notes · View notes
liesmyteachertoldme · 1 year ago
Text
Durham Report shows Democrat's Corruption
Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch insisted for years that top Obama Administration officials knew exactly what was going on. “Obama knew. Clinton knew. Biden knew,” Tom tweeted. “Comey knew. Brennan knew. McCabe knew. Strzok knew. Clapper knew. Schiff knew. FBI knew. DOJ knew. CIA knew. State knew. They all knew Trump was innocent but they smeared and spied on him.”
This month, significant new evidence comes to correct the historical record—and prove Tom right. The new evidence comes from the report of Special Counsel John Durham.
Durham goes into stunning detail. He notes that Crossfire Hurricane “was opened as a full investigation without [the FBI] ever having spoken to the persons who provided the information…without (i) any significant review of its own intelligence databases, (ii) collection and examination of any relevant intelligence from other U.S. intelligence entities, (iii) interviews of witnesses essential to understand the information it had received, (iv) using any of the standard analytical tools typically employed by the FBI in evaluating raw intelligence. Had it done so…the FBI would have learned that their own experienced Russia analysts had no information about Trump being involved with Russian leadership officials, nor were others in sensitive positions at the CIA, the NSA, and the State Department aware of such evidence.”
0 notes
zmkccommonplace · 1 year ago
Text
The LEAST one can say of it is that it involved a malicious use of federal law-enforcement officers to conduct a contrived investigation utterly lacking any valid, factual foundation from the very beginning. That is itself incredibly troubling—and also unconstitutional.
Senator Mike Lee on the Durham report into FBI activity
0 notes
Text
Elites never seem to get properly punished
1 note · View note