#Domay

[gh0stfood]

some of his development art to commemorate his release. 🐂🚧

[kairunatic]

Yes I can take them

Btw shout out to my good friend @ark-barkness for drawing me sitting hehe love u, man

[randomperson0k]

happy (late, because im a neglectful parent and forgot their birth) birthday to my jekyll and hyde lol. i created them on the date above.

heres a comparison of their designs from 2022, 2023 to 2024 (yay)

anyways uh im happy with their design and how far ive progressed with it and my art too i suppose.

yes hyde still has the fashionable red boots and the cool sparkly cape. just thats not their main outfit anymore

bad hyde doodle in celebration

[this-is-woman]

Mariah Koenig Domai

[wackysugarsocks]

[gltzgghln]

a few more pieces of chonar concept, character, and creature art. The farm of Mehdepulah's famous historical castle is much more extensive than this, but an entire city is built around it. when i design the city and landscapes of mehdepulah I can design the farm more clearly. it hasn't changed a lot in like 2,000 yrs

the kekanid with the shapeshifting tail is a revived oc from when I was 10-11 and learning abt frogs. this guy is based on the golden poison dart frog and the mutation effects Ribeiroia flatworms have on tadpoles. i think I named him seth? Idr. but he has a kinda parasyte relationship w his worm. he can turn any of his limbs into huge weapons with multiple sets of eyes, fingers, teeth, etc

the cows and big dogs are studies of what livestock would look like on mehdepulah and iesulvia respectfully

[gh0stfood]

OMG YOU HAVE A TUMBLR!!

Hi hello hahaha I love your character Domay from Eidos he's really cool!!

Thanks a bunch!! Yes I'm here!

I am really excited and interested in seeing Domay's reception, and I'm thankful for those who already like him. I hope he is warmly received, he's been through a lot.

[kairunatic]

Ahhh Thank You so much for the food

@gh0stfood 🙏

I hope Domay next cg(His alt) would be even better

[mythtiide]

i should draw willie girl to go with mortimer girl (i think that mortimer and willie are friends :))

[wackysugarsocks]

[piss-stained-jorts]

"i wanna see something other than the same edgy horror stuff when a beloved character becomes public domai-"

FUCKING MAKE IT, THEN.

the literal only difference between you and those horror directors who took mickey and winnie the pooh and made them into the horror you hate so much is that they made something and you didn't.

MAKE the romcom. MAKE the deep and existential meta horror you want to see. MAKE something cozy and child friendly. MAKE MAKE MAKE MAKE MAKE

don't just sit there and bemoan the things you don't want to see! MAKE THE THINGS YOU DO WANT TO SEE. BECAUSE NOW WE CAN MAKE ANYTHING. THAT'S THE FUCKING POINT!

YOU DON'T NEED PERMISSION. YOU DON'T NEED TO BE SOMETHING FIRST. JUST MAKE WHAT YOU WANT TO SEE.

YOU CAN'T STOP AN ARTIST FROM TAKING A CHILD FRIENDLY THING AND MAKING IT INTO HORROR. THE LITERAL ONLY PERSON YOU CAN STOP, AND ARE STOPPING, IS YOURSELF.

DON'T FUCKING WAIT FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO MAKE IT FOR YOU. PICK UP A DAMNED PENCIL/KEYBOARD/WHATEVER AND MAKE THAT THING YOU WANT TO SEE, GOD DAMMIT!!!

[gh0stfood]

Do you plan on Drawing a CG of Domay with Volund one day?

Officially? That depends on Habbit! If you mean for personal art, I guess it depends... I'm still not caught up with the story yet. If Domay and Volund could get along, then why not? :)

[kairunatic]

Two types of Bulls in AE

[walks-the-ages]

Hey just to put it out there and further signal boost-- today is August 19th 2023, and the Forgotten Lives Omnibus from Obverse is a very limited print edition whose proceeds go to Alzheimer's charity !

They're only accepting preorders through i believe the end of August as far as I can see. -- that means you've got 12 days to put in your preorder for this very rare doctor who book, while benefiting charity at the same time !

The books is limited print with no ebook edition, because the BBC is extremely strict about the Doctor Who copyright and the only reason they can do these stories is it benefits charity

Part of me really wants to make a Doctor Who Timeline post where I start it nicely with things like "Oh we're going to ease you in so you aren't overwhelmed" and immediately hit them with "READ ALL THE VIRGIN NEW ADVENTURES FROM #1 TO #60 WE WILL CONTINUE TO #61 LATER. THEN MOVE ONTO THE FUGITIVE DOCTOR COMIC - YOU WILL RETURN TO AUDIOS UPON RELEASE. NEXT, GET YOUR HANDS ON the Forgotten Lives Omnibus available at Obverse Books. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOW THIS WITH DOCTOR OMEGA, AN OBSCURE FRENCH SCI-FI FROM 1906. YOU CANNOT WATCH AN UNEARTHLY CHILD UNTIL YOU READ THIS OBSCURE FRENCH SCI-FI THAT IS ONLY DOCTOR WHO IN VIBES."

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Lisa Needham at Daily Kos:

In the last three weeks, Donald Trump has wreaked havoc on the American constitutional order. His actions have encroached on Congress' domain, and his administration is ignoring court orders. When the executive branch usurps the powers of the other two branches, that violates the separation of powers and creates the most stark constitutional crisis imaginable.   So why won’t anyone say it? Neither the mainstream media nor Democratic elected officials seem capable of calling this what it is. Instead, we have the surreal occurrence of media outlets accurately describing how the administration’s actions violate the Constitution, followed by vague hand-waving about how maybe that means a constitutional crisis will happen at some as-yet-undefined point in the future.  Take NBC News’ coverage of the Federal Emergency Management Agency continuing to freeze funding despite not one but two court orders telling them to knock it off. By any measure, the executive branch just straight-up ignoring the authority of the judicial branch is an actual factual constitutional crisis. 

But NBC twists itself in knots, framing the issue as one about federal employees being caught between Trump’s demands and court orders, saying those officials are “at the ground level of a potential constitutional crisis in which Trump is claiming expansive powers that test traditional limits on the president’s authority and could circumscribe the roles of Congress and the courts.” Besides the clunky hedging—what does it mean to be on the ground level of a potential crisis? Do crises have floors to ascend?—this is a wildly odd framing. It puts the onus for the crisis on the people carrying out Trump’s orders rather than Trump himself. It also frames Trump as chafing against some vague “traditional limits” because the piece is unwilling to speak plainly.  Other outlets hedge by misstating what is happening. On Wednesday, the Washington Post talked about the consequences of Trump ignoring court orders but framed that as something that is not yet occurring: “Should the Trump administration begin openly defying court orders, the country could be barreling toward a constitutional crisis, legal experts warn.”

The administration is already openly defying court orders. A court literally already said so, with John J. McConnell Jr., a federal judge in Rhode Island, ruling that the administration ignored his previous order and continued to freeze some federal funding.  Yes, other presidents have slow-walked implementations of court orders and have publicly complained about rulings, but that’s not what is going on here.  Imagine President Joe Biden, who routinely got kicked in the teeth by conservative courts, asserting that courts can’t tell him what to do and threatening the judges themselves.  That’s what Trump did on Tuesday, complaining that “it seems hard to believe that a judge could say, ‘We don’t want you to do that.’ So maybe we have to look at the judges. ‘Cause I think that’s a very serious violation.”  That’s been JD Vance’s stance for a while now, even before joining the Trump ticket. He believes the real constitutional crisis is when the Supreme Court steps in and tells the president he can’t do something. After Trump suffered a spate of adverse rulings, Vance took to X to gripe that “judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power.”  That’s a true statement in that it would be an overreach for the judicial branch to limit the executive branch’s legitimate authority. The issue here is that Trump and Vance don’t believe there are any limits on their authority and that only they define what is “legitimate.” They are so committed to that view that they won’t even respect court rulings that only temporarily pause their efforts while cases proceed.  [...] It all feels reminiscent of Trump’s first term, when the media went to comical lengths to avoid saying Trump was lying. Instead, we got things like “demonstrable falsehoods” and “over-broad boasts.” That persistent failure to grapple with the fact the president outright lied thousands of times, to call it what it was, is what got us here today.  The constitutional crisis we’re facing isn’t just about Trump running roughshod over separation of powers. It’s also about the fact that the courts lack adequate enforcement mechanisms when the president refuses to follow the law. 

America is in a Trump/Musk-fueled constitutional crisis.

See Also:

The Guardian: Trump’s illegitimate power grab brings US closer to dictatorship