#Delhi election 2020

[mukharnews]

बीजेपी अयोध्या चुनाव हारने के क्या कारण थे | Mukhar News

"Your News, Your Way: Mukhar News!

Subscribe for fresh updates and reliable reporting. Join us!"

[lboogie1906]

Martin Luther King III (October 23, 1957) is a human rights activist, philanthropist & advocate. The oldest living child of civil rights leaders Martin Luther King Jr. and Coretta Scott King, he served as the 4th President of the SCLC (1997-2004).

After he attended The Galloway School, he attended Morehouse College, the same school where his father, grandfather, and great-grandfather attended. He is a member of the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, as was his father. He received his BA in political science from Morehouse College.

On June 9, 1986, he announced his candidacy for the Fulton County Commission, becoming the first of his father’s immediate family to become directly involved in politics. He won the election and was re-elected in 1990, serving (1987-93). He was defeated in a special election for the Chairmanship in 1993.

He opposed the death penalty in 1989, stating “If we believed in an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, most of us would be without eyes and without teeth”. In 1993, he helped found the Estate of Martin Luther King Jr. Inc., the company that manages the license of Martin Luther King Jr.’s image and intellectual property. He remains a commissioner in the company as of 2008. During his service as a commissioner in Fulton County, he expressed appreciation to an officer who potentially saved his mother from harm from a crazed man. In February 2009, he and his wife traveled to India, fifty years after his father and mother made the trip. During his stay in India, he led a delegation, which included John Lewis and Andrew Young. In New Delhi, he visited museums on Mahatma Gandhi’s life and answered questions from students. He denounced the war in Iraq and the Mumbai attacks during a lecture at the Indian Council for Cultural Relations.

He urged Texas to grant a reprieve to death row inmate Rodney Reed in 2019 and urged Alabama to stop the execution of Nathaniel Woods in 2020.

He was among the co-founders of Bounce TV. He serves on the Board of Advisors of Let America Vote, an organization that aims to end voter suppression. #africanhistory365 #africanexcellence #alphaphialpha

[jobaaj]

In case you missed it, here’s what you need to know: Farmers are protesting Again!! But why? In 2020, farmers protested against 3 controversial laws dubbed ‘anti-farmer’ while demanding a Minimum Support Price (MSP). The protest came to an end in 2021 when the three laws were annulled by the government but no guaranteed MSP was introduced.

Thousands of farmers, representing over 200 Unions, are marching to Delhi once again to get their demands fulfilled. Some of these demands are:- An MSP that is 50% higher than the cost of crop production. compensation for the farmers who lost their lives in the protests decommissioning the cases against the farmers who took part in the protests

Pensions for farmers. Debt waivers. Fulfillment of promises made in 2021. But there is something amiss. Why are the farmers protesting when elections are so close and Lok Sabha has almost been dissolved? Wouldn’t it be better to do so when the new government is formed? In 2021, governmental authorities claimed that Khalistani elements had infiltrated the protests. Are separatists provoking an anti-India movement when elections are right around the corner? Is this a farmers’ protest or a political move against the BJP?? Follow Jobaaj Stories (the media arm of Jobaaj.com Group) for more.

[csrmagnovite24]

Singhania Group flow for sustainability‼️

As the Delhi assembly elections of 2020 drew near, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal made a resolute promise to the public: to restore the Yamuna River to a state where it would be safe for swimming by the year 2025. Yet, as the deadline approaches, the grim reality of the river's pollution persists. Recent data from environmental agencies paints a stark picture - pollution levels in the Yamuna River have surged by a troubling 25% over the past year alone. The untreated effluents discharged by industries emerge as a significant contributor to this alarming trend. Furthermore, public awareness and concern regarding environmental issues have surged, with a notable 78% of individuals expressing a preference for supporting environmentally responsible companies.

In the midst of these environmental challenges, the Pollution Control Board (PCB) intervened, delivering a damning public notice against the Singhania Group. The accusation was severe - the group was accused of discharging an alarming 62% of untreated effluent into the already beleaguered Yamuna. This revelation cast a shadow over the reputation of the Singhania Group, a textile manufacturer with a distinguished three-decade legacy. The timing of this accusation couldn't have been more detrimental as the promising future suddenly seems uncertain for the company as share prices take a dramatic plunge in the wake of recent accusations. This unfortunate timing, just as optimism reigned, casts a long shadow over their previously rosy outlook.

The fallout triggered a domino effect, eroding investor trust and confidence. With scepticism about the company's leadership and practices rising, investors are pulling back, sending share prices spiralling downwards. Heightened media attention and public speculation further amplify the negative sentiment, compounding the downward trend.

This situation underscores profound questions about environmental responsibility, corporate ethics, and the integrity of political promises. While the actions of the PCB may appear justifiable in their mission to safeguard the Yamuna, the timing raises legitimate concerns about potential political motivations. Conversely, the Singhania Group finds itself grappling with the consequences of potential negligence in effluent treatment, underscoring the critical importance of responsible industrial practices.

In response to these challenges, the Singhania Group must embark on a concerted outreach campaign aimed at showcasing their ongoing efforts to address environmental concerns. Transparency, coupled with robust community engagement initiatives and tangible sustainability measures, will be key in demonstrating the group's unwavering commitment to environmental stewardship. By aligning their corporate interests with the broader goals of societal and environmental well-being, the Singhania Group can chart a course towards a more sustainable and socially responsible future, thereby regaining the trust and confidence of the public.

TASK AT HAND

As the Singhania Group's CSR head,

1) develop a CSR campaign to restore the company's reputation

2) an investment portfolio that prioritises sustainable solutions.

3) Make a website to promote the company's CSR actions and increase transparency.

DELIVERABLES

PPT of not more than 7 slides

A website

[mullahusman]

Hashimpura Massacre

It was the 22nd of May 1987, Ramzan and Friday, just like today, when 'secular' India's most shameful and horrendous custodial kil-ling took place at #Hashimpura. That day, after the Friday prayers, in the midst of the ongoing Meerut riots, some 600-700 Muslims..

were dragged from their homes by army personnel, CRPF, PAC, and police and were made to sit on the footpath near Gulmarg Talkies. — The young and the strong among them were chosen, loaded in a PAC truck URU 1493, and taken to Upper Ganga Canal in Murad Nagar..

and later to Makanpur in Ghaziabad only to be shot cold-blooded and thrown into the canal. — This was totally an anti-muslim crime by the state, though the documented facts are known to everyone, three points are worth mentioning:

A) On May 23, 1987, at Meerut Circuit House, the next day after the massæcre, there was a meeting attended by Veer Bahadur Singh, the CM, Daya Shankar, the DGP, SK Mukherjee, the IG, Nasim Zaidi, the Ghaziabad DM, Vibhuti Narain, the Ghaziabad SP and other senior officials.

There were discussions that can the bodies of 42 be thrown away in the canal just like Malyana, never to be found? Could the 3 survivors under police protection also die? Would anyone expect justice from them? #HashimpuraMassacre

B) One of the survivors Zulfiqar Nasir had a press conference in Delhi with Syed Shahabuddin and Subramanyam Swami, narrating the nightmare he went through. There was a shameless press brief the next day addressed by Meerut DM RS Kaushik, SSP Girdhari Sharma, nd frmr SP VKB Nair.

Not only did they claim that no massacre happened at Hashimpura but also that no one with the name of Zulfiqar ever lived in Hashimpura. Shouldn't they have been punished too for propagating blatant lies. #HashimpuraMassacre

3) There were three 'Sarkari Musalmans' sitting at the vital position throughout the investigation. Just to show the Indianness in them, they did very little to ensure Justice. Syed Khalid Rizvi, who headed the CID failed to link the role of Major Satish Kaushik whose brother..

Prabhat Kumar, a RSS terrœrist, was killed the previous day; who was present at Hashimpura during the whole incident. Mr Nasim Zaidi who later became chief Election commissioner failed to act responsibly and tell the outside world about the heinous crimes.

And Ms Mohsina Kidwai, the then MP of Meerut who later became the General Secretary of AICC, not only refused to ensure medical care to one of the injured survivors but kept silent about the gory crimes.

— Hashimpura, like the Bihar killings of 1946, Nellie of 1983, Bhagalpur of 1989, Delhi Pogrom of 1984 and 2020, Muzaffarnagar of 2013, Gujarat pogrom of 2002, and numerous others remain a disgraceful instance of the merciless and barbaric use of brute state force..

and a spineless, politically expedient government lying prostate before its own men - The Killers. Hashimpura is not just an instance, it's a phenomenon that goes deep into the mindset of Indian society. Justice is awaited. #HashimpuraMassacre

"I wish the dead could have eyes for once, they could look into the Indian State with tears and anger and say that irrespective of any political party at the government, you have been inherently anti-muslim"

[brookstonalmanac]

Events 10.29 (after 1970)

1972 – The three surviving perpetrators of the Munich massacre are released from prison in exchange for the hostages of the hijacked Lufthansa Flight 615. 1980 – Demonstration flight of a secretly modified C-130 for an Iran hostage crisis rescue attempt ends in a crash landing at Eglin Air Force Base's Duke Field, Florida, leading to the cancellation of Operation Credible Sport. 1985 – Major General Samuel K. Doe is announced as the winner of the first multi-party election in Liberia. 1986 – British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher opens the last stretch of the M25 motorway. 1991 – The American Galileo spacecraft makes its closest approach to 951 Gaspra, becoming the first probe to visit an asteroid. 1994 – Francisco Martin Duran fires over two dozen shots at the White House; he is later convicted of trying to kill U.S. President Bill Clinton. 1998 – In South Africa, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission presents its report, which condemns both sides for committing atrocities. 1998 – Space Shuttle Discovery blasts off on STS-95 with 77-year-old John Glenn on board, making him the oldest person to go into space at that time. 1998 – ATSC HDTV broadcasting in the United States is inaugurated with the launch of the STS-95 space shuttle mission. 1998 – Hurricane Mitch, the second deadliest Atlantic hurricane in history, makes landfall in Honduras. 1998 – The Gothenburg discothèque fire in Sweden kills 63 and injures over 200. 1999 – A large cyclone devastates Odisha, India. 2002 – A fire destroys a luxurious department store in Ho Chi Minh City, where 1,500 people are shopping. More than 60 people die and over 100 are unaccounted for in the deadliest peacetime disaster in Vietnam. 2004 – The Arabic-language news network Al Jazeera broadcasts an excerpt from a 2004 Osama bin Laden video in which the terrorist leader first admits direct responsibility for the September 11, 2001 attacks and references the 2004 U.S. presidential election. 2005 – Bombings in Delhi, India kill 67 and injure over 200 people. 2006 – ADC Airlines Flight 053 crashes after takeoff from Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport in Abuja, Nigeria killing 96 people and injuring nine. 2008 – Delta Air Lines merges with Northwest Airlines, creating the world's largest airline and reducing the number of US legacy carriers to five. 2008 – A pair of deadly earthquakes hits Baluchistan, Pakistan, killing 215. 2012 – Hurricane Sandy hits the east coast of the United States, killing hundreds, while leaving nearly $70 billion in damages and causing major power outages. 2014 – A mud slide; the 2014 Badulla landslide, in south-central Sri Lanka, kills at least 16 people, and leaves hundreds of people missing. 2015 – China announces the end of its one-child policy after 35 years. 2018 – A Boeing 737 MAX plane crashes after taking off from Jakarta, Indonesia killing 189 people on board. 2020 – Jeremy Corbyn, Leader of the Labour Party and of the Opposition in the United Kingdom is suspended from the Labour Party following his response to findings from the EHRC on the issue of antisemitism within the party. 2022 – At least 156 die at a crowd crush during a Halloween celebration in Itaewon district, Seoul, South Korea. 2022 – At least 100 people are killed and over 300 are injured by a double car bombing in Mogadishu, Somalia.

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] GG News Bureau New Delhi, 21st Oct. Lt Governor VK Saxena on Monday raised concerns about the polluted state of the Yamuna River, sharing images of its toxic, froth-covered surface. He questioned those accountable for the river’s cleanliness, implying criticism towards previous assurances made by political leaders. Without naming anyone, Saxena addressed those who claimed to rejuvenate the Yamuna, questioning their commitment to making the river safe for public use. This remark was particularly pointed towards Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) convener Arvind Kejriwal, who had promised before the 2020 Assembly elections to cleanse the river and allow people to bathe in it by 2025. In July 2023, the Supreme Court halted a National Green Tribunal (NGT) order that appointed the Delhi LG as the chairman of a high-level committee for Yamuna rejuvenation. This decision came after the AAP government expressed concerns that the LG-led committee sidelined elected officials in the cleanup efforts. Sharing the images on social media, Saxena lamented the predicament of the Yamuna, which he described as the lifeline of Delhi for generations. He emphasized the river’s importance, especially during the “Chhath” festival, a significant event for Purvanchalis in Delhi, who worship the Sun god at water bodies. Saxena concluded by expressing his dismay at the river’s condition, stating that it was unbearable to witness the suffering of Delhi’s residents due to the pollution. The post “It’s Unbearable to Witness Yamuna’s Condition”: LG Saxena Questions Accountability appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[news365times]

[ad_1] GG News Bureau New Delhi, 21st Oct. Lt Governor VK Saxena on Monday raised concerns about the polluted state of the Yamuna River, sharing images of its toxic, froth-covered surface. He questioned those accountable for the river’s cleanliness, implying criticism towards previous assurances made by political leaders. Without naming anyone, Saxena addressed those who claimed to rejuvenate the Yamuna, questioning their commitment to making the river safe for public use. This remark was particularly pointed towards Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) convener Arvind Kejriwal, who had promised before the 2020 Assembly elections to cleanse the river and allow people to bathe in it by 2025. In July 2023, the Supreme Court halted a National Green Tribunal (NGT) order that appointed the Delhi LG as the chairman of a high-level committee for Yamuna rejuvenation. This decision came after the AAP government expressed concerns that the LG-led committee sidelined elected officials in the cleanup efforts. Sharing the images on social media, Saxena lamented the predicament of the Yamuna, which he described as the lifeline of Delhi for generations. He emphasized the river’s importance, especially during the “Chhath” festival, a significant event for Purvanchalis in Delhi, who worship the Sun god at water bodies. Saxena concluded by expressing his dismay at the river’s condition, stating that it was unbearable to witness the suffering of Delhi’s residents due to the pollution. The post “It’s Unbearable to Witness Yamuna’s Condition”: LG Saxena Questions Accountability appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[news-trust-india]

Delhi Assembly Election : दिल्ली विधानसभा चुनाव अकेले लड़ेगी AAP; भाजपा और कांग्रेस पर कसा तंज

नई दिल्ली। Delhi Assembly Election  बुधवार को आम आदमी पार्टी की राष्ट्रीय प्रवक्ता प्रियंका कक्कड़ ने कहा कि पार्टी दिल्ली विधानसभा चुनाव अकेले लड़ेगी। एएनआई से बात करते हुए कक्कड़ ने कहा कि हम दिल्ली विधानसभा चुनाव अकेले लड़ेंगे। एक तरफ यह अति आत्मविश्वास वाली कांग्रेस है और दूसरी तरफ, यह अहंकारी भारतीय जनता पार्टी है। UP By-Election : समाजवादी पार्टी ने छह सीटों पर उम्मीदवारों की घोषणा की 2020…

[tfgadgets]

Duck In Haryana, First Seat In J&K

J&K Assembly Election: AAP leaders like Sanjay Singh campaigned for Mehraj Malik. New Delhi: The Aam Aadmi Party’s Mehraj Malik – who handed his party a first ever electoral win in Jammu and Kashmir, in local body polls in December 2020 – has now won the Doda legislative seat to give the AAP a first ever Assembly seat in the former state. J&K is holding its first Assembly election in a…

[werindialive]

Harini Amarasuriya Becomes Sri Lanka's First Female Prime Minister in 25 Years, Hindu College Alumna 

Harini Amarasuriya, an accomplished academic and activist, has been appointed as the 16th Prime Minister of Sri Lanka, making her the first woman to hold this position in nearly 25 years. She follows in the footsteps of the country’s trailblazing female leaders like Sirimavo Bandaranaike and Chandrika Kumaratunga. At 54, Amarasuriya's rise to the nation’s top political office is a testament to her significant contributions to academia, social justice, and politics.

Born and raised in Colombo, Amarasuriya’s academic journey began with her Bachelor’s degree in Sociology from Delhi University’s Hindu College, where she studied from 1991 to 1994. She later pursued a Master’s in Applied Anthropology and Development Studies from an Australian university and a PhD in Social Anthropology from the University of Edinburgh. Her academic credentials and focus on critical issues such as youth, gender rights, and social activism earned her recognition in both academic and political circles.

Amarasuriya’s connection to Hindu College has been a point of pride for the institution. Principal Anju Srivastava expressed delight over her appointment, noting that the college, which has a rich tradition of political involvement, is honoured to have produced such a distinguished leader. Hindu College, known for nurturing future leaders across various fields, holds elections for student leaders annually, fostering a politically active environment that may have shaped Amarasuriya’s future career.

Entering politics in 2020 through the National People's Power (NPP) party’s national list, Amarasuriya quickly became a voice for progressive change in Sri Lanka. Her focus on education, child protection, and social justice issues resonated with many, helping her secure a prominent role in Sri Lanka’s political landscape. As Prime Minister, she will oversee crucial portfolios, including Justice, Labour, Education, Health, and more.

Her appointment is not just a personal achievement but also a milestone for Sri Lanka, as she becomes the country’s first female prime minister in over two decades. It also signals a strengthened cultural link between Sri Lanka and India, given her academic ties to Delhi. Many hope that her leadership will pave the way for stronger bilateral relations between the two nations.

Amarasuriya’s journey from academic to prime minister illustrates the growing influence of educated women in global politics, and her leadership will be closely watched as Sri Lanka navigates complex political and economic challenges. For more politics news in Hindi, subscribe to our newsletter

[cmitimesnews-blog]

Atishi Singh Will be the Next Chief Minister of Delhi

Atishi Marlena Singh or Atishi Singh will be the next Chief Minister of Delhi. She is going to become the third woman Chief Minister of Delhi. Atishi’s name has been approved in the legislative party meeting. On Tuesday morning, a meeting of the legislative party was called at the residence of AAP convener Sri Arvind Kejriwal in Civil Lines.In this, the new leader of the House was elected unanimously. Atishi belongs to a Punjabi  family and is a graduate from Oxford University.Atishi was elected MLA for the first time in the 2020 assembly elections and became a minister in the Kejriwal government for the first time in 2023. Atishi is considered to be Kejriwal’s close friend and confidant. She has been active in the organisation since the time of the Anna movement.Currently, she has the responsibility of the maximum number of ministries and since Kejriwal went to jail in March, she has been seen handling the reins of the party as well as the government.

[ezivoteofficial]

Political is fun with Ezivote

Know about the celebrities who supported farmer’s protest

India’s ongoing farmers’ protest in the election year 2024 unfolds conflicts between the central government and protesting farmers. This freshens the memories of a year-long protest of 2020-21 when farmers of Punjab, Haryana, and Uttar Pradesh were protesting against the three controversial farm laws. The main demands are to reject smart meters, waive debt, legal procurement assurances, and set a Minimum Support Price (MSP) for commodities based on the Swaminathan formula. The results of the protests remain blurry as the central government is in the process of establishing communication with the farmers’ community. The last protest was backed by many celebrities. Read on to learn about celebrities who supported the farmers' protest and how they extended their support.

Celebrities who supported farmer's protest

Celebrities from various fields including activists, singers, actors, and global stars backed the last farmer’s protest. Some supported farmers by visiting the protest while others showed virtual support leading to social media trends.

Rihanna

Global star, singer, and actor Rihanna extended her support to the farmers as she shared a CNN news report on X. Her tweet along with the report read, “Why aren’t we talking about this?”. Amid this, there was a rise in controversies, and the internet divided into two groups, one appreciating Rihanna for extending support while some trolled her for the same.

Greta Thunberg

Another controversy came up after climate activist Greta Thunberg shared a toolkit related to the farmer’s protest. The Delhi Police's cybercrime unit filed a formal complaint (FIR) based on sedition, criminal conspiracy, and inciting hatred, over the post and its accompanying tools.

Amanda Cerny

Amanda Cerny, a US-based vlogger also extended virtual support to the protests resulting in massive trolling. Her Instagram post read, “does not have to be Indian, Punjabi or South Asian to understand the issue. All one has to do is care about humanity”.

Lilly Singh

One of the prominent content creators and Youtuber Lilly Singh, known for her sarcastic and humorous content walked the Grammys red carpet with a mask that read I stand with farmers’. Furthermore, she posted on X, “I know red carpet/award show pictures always get the most coverage, so here you go media. Feel free to run with it Raised fist #IStandWithFarmers #GRAMMYs.”

To sum up

Bollywood celebrities including Sonakshi Sinha, Taapsee Pannu, Richa Chada, and Swara Bhasker also supported farmers. Some celebs stood with the government and shared posts with hashtags of India Together and India against Propaganda. Their list includes Bollywood’s Akshay Kumar, Ajay Devgan, and Sunil Shetty. Cricket icons including Virat Kohli and Sachin Tendulkar also supported the same.

Your opinion counts!

Now you know the instances where celebrities extended support to the farmer’s protest, it's time to express your opinion. At Ezivote, we bring you stories that help you understand, relate, and become an opinionated citizen. Let us know your opinion in the form provided.

Know more ezivote

[boyikayoyouy]

The U.S. policy on Myanmar is all wrong

NEW DELHI - U.S. President Joe Biden and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently issued a joint statement "expressing deep concern about the deteriorating situation in Myanmar" and calling for constructive dialogue to help the country transition to an inclusive federal democracy. Unfortunately, U.S.-led sanctions undermine this goal and make the situation worse.

Western sanctions, while inflicting pain on ordinary Myanmar citizens, have left the ruling military elite relatively unscathed, leaving the military junta with no incentive to loosen political control. The main beneficiary is China, which has been able to expand its foothold in a country it sees as a strategic gateway to the Indian Ocean and a vital source of natural resources.

This development has exacerbated regional security challenges. For example, Chinese military personnel are nowHelping set up a listening post on Myanmar's Great Coco Island , north of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands where the Indian military's only tri-services headquarters is located. Once operational, the new spy station is likely to assist China in its maritime surveillance of India, including monitoring the movements of nuclear submarines and tracking missile tests that often land in the Bay of Bengal.

To some extent, history is repeating itself. Starting in the late 1980s, previous U.S.-led sanctions paved the way for China to become Myanmar's main trading partner and investor. This sanctions regime lasted until 2012, when Obama announced a new US policy and became the first US president to visit Myanmar. In 2015, Myanmar elected its first civilian-led government, ending decades of military dictatorship.

However, in February 2021, the military stag ed a coup and detained civilian leaders including Aung San Suu Kyi, prompting the Biden administration to reimpose sweeping sanctions. Importantly, the reversal of Myanmar's democratic project was precipitated by earlier US targeted measures against the military leadership, including Commander-in-Chief Min Aung Hlaing, over human rights abuses against Rohingya Muslims that forced the majority Flee to Bangladesh.After President Trump's administration imposed sanctions on Min Aung Hlaing and other senior commanders in July 2019 , the generals lost momentum to maintain Myanmar's democratization. A year and a half later, they overthrew the civilian government after denouncing the results of the November 2020 national election as fraudulent.

The lesson for Western policymakers should be clear. Separate sanctions on foreign officials—an essentially symbolic gesture—could severely hamper U.S. diplomacy and have unintended consequences. (Indeed, China has resisted direct military talks proposed by the Biden administration as a means of protest against U.S. sanctions against Gen. Ri Shang-bok, who became China’s defense minister in March.

The United States’ chronic lack of contact with Myanmar’s nationalist military, the only functioning institution in a culturally and ethnically diverse society, isThe stubborn problems of its Myanmar policy . Because of this limitation, Aung San Suu Kyi achieved near-saint status in the Western imagination, and the highly regarded Nobel Peace Prize winner came after she defended Myanmar's Rohingya policy against genocide charges. The reputation of the award winner plummeted.

With junta leaders under sanctions and civilian leaders in detention, the United States has few tools to influence political developments in Myanmar. Instead, the United States and its allies have tightened sanctions and supported armed resistance to military rule. To this end, the 2023 U.S. National Defense Authorization Act added a provision for Myanmar, authorizing the provision of "non-lethal assistance" to anti-regime armed groups, including the People's Defense Forces. People's Defense Forces This is a nominal army established by the shadow government of national unity. Biden now has considerable scope to help Myanmar's anti-junta insurgency, just as Obama provided "non-lethal assistance" in the form of battlefield support equipment to Ukrainian troops and Syrian rebels .

But such an intervention could plunge Myanmar into greater chaos and poverty without advancing U.S. interests. Even if the different groups behind the armed uprising manage to overthrow the military junta, Myanmar will not become a democracy again. Instead, it will become a Libyan-style failed state and the bane of regional security. It will also continue to become a proxy battlefield between Western powers and China and Russia. A United Nations report estimates that Myanmar has imported at least $1 billion worth of weapons and dual-use items since the coup, mainly from China and Russia.

China's rapid expansion of its footprint in Myanmar is a strategic loss for the United States . It didn't have to be this way. Given Myanmar’s strategic location, the military junta’s aggressive moves could be responded to by gradually easing sanctions and integrating Myanmar into the U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy.

Sanctions naturally close the door to dialogue and influence and therefore should never be used as the first tool of foreign policy. After Thailand's army chief seized power in a 2014 coup, the United States wisely eschewed sanctions and opted for engagement, which helped protect Thailand's thriving civil society. This strategy ultimately led to the general's defeat in the recent national election .

Myanmar's return to democracy can only be achieved gradually by engaging the country's military rulers and providing them with incentives to change course. Sanctions without participation have never worked. If Biden can engage closely with China, the world's largest, most powerful, and longest-standing authoritarian state, including sending the CIA director, secretary of state, and secretary of the treasury to Beijing, he should at least open up channels with Myanmar's military junta. communication channels.

The alliance of military monarchies has long shaped Thailand's political development, with generals seizing power 12 times in the past nine decadesRegime, similarly, Myanmar’s armed forces have traditionally asserted themselves as the most powerful political actor in the country. The 2008 constitution that helped Aung San Suu Kyi come to powerretained their power, and it showed. If the United States does not shift its policy toward gradually engaging with the military junta, Myanmar will remain a playground for major powers with no hope of achieving a new democratic opening.

#peace#Burma

[mariacallous]

The specter of Donald Trump is haunting Europe. Across the continent, an air of thinly disguised panic greets the prospect of his returning as U.S. president next year. But in Asia? Not so much. From New Delhi and Singapore to Taipei and Tokyo, there is palpable sang-froid. We coped with Trump last time, this thinking goes. Those nervy Europeans might be losing their cool, but cannier heads prevail in rising Asia.

This calm in Asian capitals borders on hubris. It misjudges the impact Trump’s return could have on Asian security and misreads the scale and ambition of his plans to remodel U.S. foreign policy. It also overstates the ability of Asian governments—from core U.S. allies to the more nonaligned nations in Southeast Asia and elsewhere—to manage Trump.

To understand this surprising sense of calm, it helps to remember how Asian policymakers viewed Trump during his last term in office. As I wrote in Foreign Policy then, Asian leaders were generally quite comfortable with Trump.

This was true for U.S. allies, such as Japan, as well as close partners, such as India. Then-Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi agreed with Trump’s anti-China policies and accepted his transactional instincts. Australia’s right-wing prime minister at the time, Scott Morrison, similarly warmed to Trump. And in Taiwan, Trump was loved.

Even in largely nonaligned Southeast Asia, hardheaded analysts would note Trump’s good points. In Singapore, former ambassador Bilahari Kausikan had been critical of the Obama administration’s Asia policy, as embodied by National Security Advisor Susan Rice. “She has very little interest in Asia, no stomach for competition, and thinks of foreign policy as humanitarian intervention,” Bilahari wrote in a Facebook post in 2020, as rumors swirled of Rice possibly being picked as Joe Biden’s running mate. Trump, by contrast, was firm on China and not squeamish about U.S. power.

The view that Trump will be manageable this time around also flows from a comfortable belief in policy continuity. Few analysts lose face by predicting more continuity than change following elections. And during the shift from Trump to Biden, much indeed stayed the same, not least Trump’s approach to China.

During the Trump administration, many in the region felt they improved their ties with Washington, too. At last month’s Raisina Dialogue in New Delhi, Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar brushed off concerns that a Trump return might bring challenges. “Like any relationship, there were issues,” he said. “But overall … in those four years, did our relationship deepen? Did it grow? Absolutely.”

Finally, the United States has core interests, whoever is in power. Former White House official Michael J. Green makes this point in By More Than Providence, his masterful 2017 history of U.S. policy in Asia. Washington’s longtime strategic imperative is to ensure the Pacific Ocean remains a “conduit for American ideas and goods to flow westward, and not for threats to flow eastward toward the homeland,” he writes.

For more than a century, the United States has aimed to block a rival power dominating either Europe or Asia. Faced with the challenge of China’s emergence as a peer competitor, even Trump will find pure isolationism difficult, given that this would mean ceding much of Asia to Beijing. The nightmare that keeps officials in Tokyo and Seoul up at night, in which Trump makes a deal with Beijing and cuts and runs, remains unlikely.

Yet this sophisticated kind of analysis also risks being too clever by half. Yes, there will be some continuity if Trump takes office in 2025. But there will be plenty of chaos and disruption, too.

At a basic level, many Asian nations are in a worse position to cope this time around. Abe and Morrison might have handled Trump well. But how about less sure-footed leaders, such as Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, let alone those from the political left, such as Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese?

Then there are three bigger problems that should alarm Asian leaders.

The first is Trump’s growing unpredictability. Here, the recent case of TikTok is instructive: Trump has totally changed his view on the Chinese-owned app of late, moving from backing a ban to opposing it. His view seems to have changed for no obvious reason beyond political expediency and lobbying by donors.

If he is willing to flip-flop here, U.S. allies and partners must be prepared for significant change in other areas. Trump says he will junk Biden’s Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, which wouldn’t be the end of the world. But will he really back the Biden administration’s hugely expensive AUKUS submarine deal? Or continue to invest in alliances with South Korea and Japan—or in bodies such as the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue? What about his attitude toward Washington’s nuclear posture in the region? In truth, no one knows.

The second problem is China. Sino-U.S. ties remain far more fragile than in 2017. Even if relations between Beijing and Washington currently seem calm following intense diplomacy by Biden’s team, this state of affairs is unlikely to last. “The weather has improved. But I think the climate … is not in such a happy place,” as Singaporean Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan put it last year.

The risk of a new Sino-U.S. flare-up remains strong. And with Trump in charge, the risk that any such flare-up could escalate into a genuine crisis would rise. The thought of Trump and his team handling the Israel-Hamas war should give anyone in Asia pause about how he might handle a serious standoff over Taiwan, for instance.

Yet it is the final problem of a Trump victory that is by orders of magnitude the most serious for Asia—namely, the strife another Trump term would cause in the United States itself.

For the last four years, Biden has led an energetic but sober Asia policy. His team has rebuilt—and in many cases, strengthened—U.S. alliance relationships in the region and attempted to restore deterrence against China. It is hard to predict whether a new Trump administration would keep or overturn these efforts, largely because his return would throw the U.S. political system into deep and unpredictable turmoil.

This month, I visited the conservative-leaning Hoover Institution at Stanford University. Hoover is now a genteel sanctuary for many moderate Trump-era foreign-policy officials, from former Defense Secretary James Mattis to former National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster and Deputy National Security Advisor Matt Pottinger. Yet few, if any, experienced officials in this vein would likely feature in a second Trump term. Instead, Trump’s team looks set to appoint mostly ultraloyalists, many of whom will have little deep foreign-policy experience.

Stanford is also home to the political scientist Francis Fukuyama, the author of The End of History and the Last Man, who warns that Asian leaders should in fact be deeply alarmed at Trump’s probable impact on U.S. policymaking in areas from alliance management to deterrence posture. But most alarming would be the shake-up a new Trump administration would bring to the U.S. government itself.

Fukuyama points to a new wave of so-called “Schedule F” political appointees, named after an executive order that Trump pushed through a few weeks before the 2020 election. With the goal of dismantling what his allies view as the “deep state” and asserting presidential control, they now talk of forcing as many as 50,000 career civil servants from their jobs and replacing them with political loyalists.

Lawyers are gearing up to challenge any such plans, which would likely lead to a battle in the Supreme Court. If successful, the impact of this move on the core of the U.S. foreign-policy establishment in the State Department and the Pentagon would be seismic. “If I was an Asian ally, I would be very worried indeed,” Fukuyama told me. Whatever happens, domestic infighting will prove an overwhelming distraction for U.S. policymakers. It will invite global rivals, notably China and Russia, to test U.S. alliances and commitments. “If anyone in Asia thinks the U.S. is going to be able to do more to support allies like Japan and Korea at a time like this, they are crazy,” Fukuyama said.

Everything is relative, of course. Asian leaders may indeed have less to worry about than their hapless European counterparts, let alone the Ukrainians heroically defending their country. Trump is unlikely to pull out of Asian alliances entirely, as he has threatened to do with NATO in Europe.

Nonetheless, the blithe approach in Asian capitals toward a very possible Trump return remains a serious misjudgment. When a storm is approaching, it is rarely wise to look on the bright side, hoping everything will be fine just because it went OK the last time the weather turned bad. In Asia, just as elsewhere, it would be smarter to batten down the hatches.

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 14th October. The diplomatic relationship between Bharat and Canada has entered a turbulent phase, marked by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s allegations against the Bharatiya government concerning the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Canadian-based Khalistani separatist. The Modi government has expressed strong displeasure over these allegations, asserting that Canada cannot make unsubstantiated charges against Bharat while turning a blind eye to anti-Bharat activities on its soil. The Background of the Controversy Nijjar, designated a terrorist by Bharat in 2020, was shot dead on June 18, 2023, an incident that has escalated into a serious diplomatic row. During a recent meeting on the sidelines of the ASEAN Summit in Vientiane, Laos, Trudeau accused Bharat of involvement in Nijjar’s death, a claim that Bharat categorically rejected as “absurd” and “motivated.” The Bharatiya government contends that there are discrepancies between Trudeau’s allegations and the ongoing investigation by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), which is still examining the circumstances surrounding the murder. Following the meeting, the Bharatiya government conveyed its position to high-ranking Canadian officials, emphasizing that Canada must refrain from politicizing its investigative processes. Bharat highlighted that directing investigative agencies based on political agendas is a violation of legal principles. This assertion underscores a critical aspect of the diplomatic disagreement: Bharat’s insistence on treating allegations with due process and substantiated evidence. Diplomatic Dynamics The Modi government’s response has been characterized by a call for accountability. Bharat demands that Canada take verifiable actions against the Khalistani activities that threaten Bharat’s sovereignty and security. The Indian Ministry of External Affairs has clearly stated that the way forward for improved bilateral relations is for Canada to address and act against these anti-Bharat elements within its jurisdiction. Trudeau’s approach appears to be influenced by domestic political considerations, especially as he faces a public inquiry into allegations of foreign interference in Canadian elections. His framing of the conversation with Modi as a “brief exchange” indicates an attempt to maintain a stance of political accountability, albeit at the potential cost of deteriorating international relations with a major player like Bharat. Conclusion The ongoing diplomatic tussle between Bharat and Canada represents a significant challenge to bilateral relations, with potential implications for regional stability and international diplomacy. The Modi government’s strong stance against unsubstantiated allegations from Canada reflects a broader trend of nations becoming increasingly assertive in protecting their sovereignty in the face of external pressures. As this situation unfolds, it is crucial for both nations to engage in dialogue rooted in mutual respect and understanding. For Canada, addressing the concerns raised by Bharat could pave the way for more constructive relations, while for Bharat, it remains vital to assert its position against any form of external interference that undermines its national integrity. The Modi government’s reaction to the allegations against Bharat is justified. Countries must uphold the principles of sovereignty and respect in international relations. Canada’s allegations not only challenge these principles but also risk escalating tensions unnecessarily. For a fruitful relationship to flourish, both countries need to engage in transparent dialogue, focusing on mutual interests rather than political gains. Canada should act decisively against anti-Bharat activities to foster trust and cooperation. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, diplomatic relations grounded in truth and integrity are paramount for global peace and stability.   [ad_2] Source link