#Chief Justice News

[rightnewshindi]

मुख्य न्यायाधीश चंद्रचूड़ ने हाथ जोड़कर और पूरी गर्दन झुककर न्यायिक सेवा को कहा अलविदा, जानें अंतिम समय में क्या कहा

CJI DY Chandrachud News: भारत के मुख्य न्यायाधीश के रूप में डीवाई चंद्रचूड़ के कार्यकाल का अंतिम दिन था। भारत के मुख्य न्यायाधीश डीवाई चंद्रचूड़ को न्यायिक सेवा से सेवानिवृत्त होने पर शुक्रवार को सुप्रीम कोर्ट में औपचारिक विदाई दी गई। अपने अंतिम कार्य दिवस पर डीवाई चंद्रचूड़ ने कृतज्ञता और विनम्रता के साथ अपनी न्यायिक यात्रा पर विचार साझा किया। व्यक्तिगत विचार साझा करते हुए उन्होंने अपने…

[mitch-is-an-artist]

primodial waters

[mofffun]

"King of Gokkan"

a web manga retelling of King-Ohger from Rita's point of view, featuring new scenes from the show.

First 10 chapters release midnight 11/11 JPT, updates every Saturday. First 3 free to read. On TTFC, Piccoma and Booklive (no vpn required).

(summary of ch1-10)

[contemplatingoutlander]

This is an important article by Linda Greenhouse, writing in The New York Times. Therefore, the link above is a gift 🎁 link, so anyone can read the article, even if they don't subscribe to the Times.

Below are some excerpts from the article:

To understand today’s Supreme Court, to see it whole, demands a longer timeline. To show why, I offer a thought experiment. Suppose a modern Rip Van Winkle went to sleep in September 2005 and didn’t wake up until last week. Such a person would awaken in a profoundly different constitutional world, a world transformed, term by term and case by case, at the Supreme Court’s hand. To appreciate that transformation’s full dimension, consider the robust conservative wish list that greeted the new chief justice 18 years ago: Overturn Roe v. Wade. Reinterpret the Second Amendment to make private gun ownership a constitutional right. Eliminate race-based affirmative action in university admissions. Elevate the place of religion across the legal landscape. Curb the regulatory power of federal agencies. [...} That was how the world looked on Sept. 29, 2005, when Chief Justice Roberts took the oath of office, less than a month after the death of his mentor, Chief Justice Rehnquist. And this year? By the time the sun set on June 30, the term’s final day, every goal on the conservative wish list had been achieved. All of it. To miss that remarkable fact is to miss the story of the Roberts court. It’s worth reviewing how the court accomplished each of the goals. It deployed a variety of tools and strategies. Precedents that stood in the way were either repudiated outright, as the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision did last year to Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, or were simply rendered irrelevant — abandoned, in the odd euphemism the court has taken to using. In its affirmative action decision declaring race-conscious university admissions to be unconstitutional, Chief Justice Roberts’s majority opinion did not overturn the 2003 Grutter decision explicitly. But Justice Thomas was certainly correct in his concurring opinion when he wrote that it was “clear that Grutter is, for all intents and purposes, overruled.” Likewise, the court has not formally overruled its Chevron decision. Its administrative-law decisions have just stopped citing that 1984 precedent as authority. The justices have simply replaced Chevron’s rule of judicial deference with its polar opposite, a new rule that goes by the name of the major questions doctrine. Under this doctrine, the court will uphold an agency’s regulatory action on a major question only if Congress’s grant of authority to the agency on the particular issue was explicit. Deference, in other words, is now the exception, no longer the rule. But how to tell a major question from an ordinary one? No surprise there: The court itself will decide. [...] My focus here on what these past 18 years have achieved has been on the court itself. But of course, the Supreme Court doesn’t stand alone. Powerful social and political movements swirl around it, carefully cultivating cases and serving them up to justices who themselves were propelled to their positions of great power by those movements. The Supreme Court now is this country’s ultimate political prize. That may not be apparent on a day-to-day or even a term-by-term basis. But from the perspective of 18 years, that conclusion is as unavoidable as it is frightening.

[wuffgang-ameowdeus-moozart]

@dysphoria-things

@velourzrouge

@ty-bayonet-betteridge

ur government assigned gender for the day is the first thing u get when u click this link to a randomised wikipedia article. NO REROLLS . i am the  trollsteineggje mountain in norway

[todayworldnews2k21]

Justice Sanjiv Khanna Takes Oath As 51st Chief Justice Of India

Justice Sanjiv Khanna sworn in as the 51st Chief Justice of India (CJI) on Monday morning in a ceremony led by President Droupadi Murmu at Rashtrapati Bhavan. This marks the start of a new era for India’s judiciary as Justice Khanna takes over from Justice DY Chandrachud, who retired on November 10. Justice Chandrachud’s two-year term was notable for handling key constitutional cases and…

[impossibleperfectionnerd]

libel is murder of a person. Intentional murder of a person. Repeated Stealing in the extreme is heinous murder of a person. Life liberty property. (They’re the same -organized behavior). Loss of liberty in jail is death already. Libel is punishable by death outside of Philippine territory if too much. If it induces stealing. Most especially.

[iamhussainialvi]

🔥🍩 Viral Showdown: Donut Shop Worker Confronts Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa! 🍩🔥

📝Title

Justice Qazi Faez Isa Faces Unexpected Confrontation at Donut Shop: A Viral Sensation

🧑‍🔬Bio

I’m Muhammad Faisal Hussaini, an artist passionate about capturing the essence of human experiences through my work.

🔖Label

Controversial Viral Video

🎯Tags

Qazi Faez Isa, Donut Shop Incident, Viral Video, Chief Justice, Pakistan News, Social Media Reactions, Public Opinion, Free Speech, Controversy, Islamabad

#️⃣Hashtags

#QaziFaezIsa #ViralVideo #DonutShopIncident #ChiefJustice #PakistanNews #SocialMedia #PublicOpinion #FreeSpeech #Controversy #Islamabad

😇Category

News & Politics

Description

In a surprising turn of events, a video featuring Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa at a popular donut shop in Islamabad has taken the internet by storm. The video, which quickly went viral, shows a cashier at Crusteez Donuts refusing service to the Chief Justice and using the term “LANAT,” a word that carries a strong negative connotation akin to a curse or condemnation12. This incident has sparked a heated debate on social media, with opinions divided on the appropriateness of the cashier’s actions.

The video captures the moment when Chief Justice Isa, accompanied by his family, was confronted by the cashier. The refusal of service and the derogatory remark have led to a flurry of reactions online. Some netizens have praised the cashier for what they see as an act of free speech and dissent against a controversial figure, while others have condemned the behavior as disrespectful and inappropriate, especially given the Chief Justice’s status and the presence of his family12.

Crusteez Donuts has since issued a public statement, distancing itself from the cashier’s actions and emphasizing that such behavior does not reflect the company’s values or customer service standards. The bakery has expressed regret for any offense caused and assured the public that the matter is being addressed internally12.

The incident has also caught the attention of local authorities, who temporarily sealed the bakery over a health-related violation. This move has further fueled the debate, with some arguing that the closure represents an overreach of authority and raises questions about the balance between respect for public figures and the right to express dissent12.

As the video continues to circulate, it has become a focal point for discussions on free speech, respect for authority, and the limits of public dissent. The incident highlights the complex dynamics at play in Pakistan’s social and political landscape, where public figures often find themselves at the center of intense scrutiny and debate.

For those interested in the broader implications of this incident, it serves as a reminder of the power of social media in shaping public discourse and the importance of maintaining civility, even in moments of dissent. The viral video of Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa at Crusteez Donuts is more than just a fleeting moment of controversy; it is a reflection of the ongoing dialogue about authority, respect, and the right to free expression in contemporary society.

Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story and join the conversation by sharing your thoughts in the comments below. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more viral news and updates!

🔔Subscribe & 👍Like💖 for new VIDEOS📼Every Day!👇

🔗https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x96fgsc

🔗https://cos.tv/videos/play/55853030544806912

🗺️Subscribe & 👍Like💖 for new POSTS📃Every Day!👇

🔗http://youtube.com/post/UgkxiMA6wENZC3w8_Mlp__btgMGUvLEumZ2s?si=MlBX07kjRn4GnBky

🔗https://advance-news-110.blogspot.com/2024/09/viral-showdown-donut-shop-worker.html

🔗Check out this post on Yo.Fan https://yo.fan/p/3UzZdYQXuo0

[rightnewshindi]

कोर्ट की खबरों की कवर करने के लिए एलएलबी की जरूरत खत्म, मुख्य न्यायाधीश ने पत्रकारों को दिया बड़ा तोहफा

CJI DY Chandrachud: सीजेआई डीवाई चंद्रचूड़ जाते-जाते पत्रकारों को बड़ा तोहफा दे गए। चीफ जस्टिस ऑफ इंडिया ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट की खबरों को कवर करने वाले पत्रकारों को छूट दी है। छूट यह कि अब सुप्रीम कोर्ट की खबरों को कवर करने वाले पत्रकारों को एलएलबी की डिग्री की जरूरत नहीं होगी। उन्होंने कहा कि उन्हें इस बात की जानकारी नहीं है कि सुप्रीम कोर्ट कवर करने वाले पत्रकारों को मान्यता प्राप्त संवाददाता बनने…

[contemplatingoutlander]

Jamelle Bouie does a good job of underscoring just how fed up Justice Elena Kagan is with the decisions coming from the right-wing justices on the court, and why she questions the constitutionality of Roberts' majority opinion in Biden v. Nebraska (the student loan forgiveness case). Here are some excerpts from Bouie's NY Times newsletter:

But I don’t want to discuss Roberts’s majority opinion [in Biden v. Nebraska] as much as I do Justice Elena Kagan’s dissent. Kagan wrote something unusual. She didn’t just challenge the chief justice’s reasoning, she questioned whether the court’s decision was even constitutional. “From the first page to the last, today’s opinion departs from the demands of judicial restraint,” Kagan wrote. “At the behest of a party that has suffered no injury, the majority decides a contested public policy issue properly belonging to the politically accountable branches and the people they represent.” She continued: “That is a major problem not just for governance, but for democracy too. Congress is of course a democratic institution; it responds, even if imperfectly, to the preferences of American voters. And agency officials, though not themselves elected, serve a President with the broadest of all political constituencies. But this Court? It is, by design, as detached as possible from the body politic. That is why the Court is supposed to stick to its business — to decide only cases and controversies, and to stay away from making this Nation’s policy about subjects like student-loan relief.” The court, Kagan concluded, “exercises authority it does not have. It violates the Constitution.” [...] Kagan’s dissent, in other words, is a call for accountability. For Congress, especially, to exercise its authority to discipline the court when it oversteps its bounds. Democrats may or may not get this particular message. But John Roberts heard it loud and clear. “It has become a disturbing feature of some recent opinions to criticize the decisions with which they disagree as going beyond the proper role of the judiciary,” he wrote in his opinion. “It is important that the public not be misled either. Any such misperception would be harmful to this institution and our country.” For Roberts, the problem isn’t that the Supreme Court is overstepping its bounds, it’s that one of its justices has decided that she’s had enough. [emphasis added]

[townpostin]

New Sub-Divisional Civil Court Inaugurated in Chakradharpur

Chief Justice Inaugurates Chakradharpur Sub-Divisional Court A new sub-divisional court in Chakradharpur was inaugurated with traditional rituals and mantras. CHAKRADHARPUR – The Chakradharpur Sub-Divisional Court was inaugurated on Sunday amidst traditional rituals and chanting of mantras. Priests Gautam Nanda and Mahadev Nanda conducted the ceremonies. The building was officially opened by…

[easynotes4u]

Appointment of Shri Justice Sheel Nagu as Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court

Order of appointment of Shri Justice Sheel Nagu, Judge, Madhya Pradesh High Court as Chief Justice of P&H High Court (04.07.2024) Appointment of Shri Justice Sheel Nagu as Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (1) of Article 217 of the Constitution of India, the President is pleased to appoint Shri Justice Sheel Nagu, Judge of the High…

[todayworldnews2k21]

Watch: 51st Chief Justice Of India Sanjiv Khanna Takes Oath At Rashtrapati Bhawan

The 51st Chief Justice of India (CJI) Justice Sanjiv Khanna on Monday took oath at the Rashtrapati Bhawan. President of India Droupadi Murmu administered oath to the 51st Chief Justice of India on November 11.   The ceremony was presided over by President Droupadi Murmu and was attended by several dignitaries including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, the former CJI…

[impossibleperfectionnerd]

it’s Sylvina. Cecilios. Manny. Serrano. Charito Hugo ilao. Opus Dei. Irene Yang. Chairman Tan. Muslim terrorist.