#CCerrs
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Is Darren’s watch gay?
Today the CC fandom has a theory that Darren wore his PINK and blue watch because it’s a “gay” watch or a symbol of his queerness.... because PINK obviously means gay, right?
The watch has the added advantage of being both pink and blue ...therefore it’s a solid representation of both Chris and Darren -at least according to the CC belief that blue represents Chris and PINK represents Darren, like DUH! For anyone new, the color symbolism is something the CCers have long believed....I mean, that is something normal adults do right? Assign colors to their OTP or even better, to themselves and then actually wear those colors once a year to send a secret “high-five” to those fans who are paying enough attention to “get it”..I mean it’s totes normal, right?
Anonymous asked:
hello love! i hope you’re doing well! i know this doesn’t mean anything but i saw the thumbnail for the interview you linked of d saying he doesn’t know who he came out straight to and he’s wearing a watch with a blue band and pink face and i noticed he’s wearing either the same or a similar watch when rehearsing in lsb! but then his watch changes and i thought it was weird,,, anyway sorry for the ramble!!
ajw720 answered:
Hello nonnie!!!! Excellent observation. That is a watch he has had for years, He used to always wear it, now much less, likely not approved by his team, plus often the watch he wears now is a paid endorsement.
But the pink and blue watch, that is genuine D and what he loves. Add pink is D and Blue is C and those colors have been associated with their relationship since the beginning.
I always smile when he wears that watch. I think it is very special to him.
LSB rehearsal 2019. He clearly looks happy and like his watch is “special to him” and we all know that photos (and screen grabs) are PROOF of Darren’s emotions.
LSB BTS package 2019. He’s MUCH happier here.
George Stroumboulopoulos Tonight 2012
Apparently, Darren hasn’t worn the watch much -not something I have ever paid attention to- but it was spotted on his arm during rehearsals for LSB. It’s clearly not the same watch as the band is teal in the 2012 screen grab and blue in the more recent one.
(I posted the comments out of order so ya know go read the original if you want a more accurate reflection of their thought process).
Sometimes the CC Conspiracy Theorists catch the fact that the items they are matching- don’t actually match....
souly
If I remember correctly, this is not the original watch though. I don’t remember what he said about the original one, but he stopped wearing it for a while. At the first Elsie (or was it the second?), a fan gave him the new watch. There was a post about it back then, but I don’t know if it’s still around.
Anyway, I do believe though that he loves this watch for what it stands for - the original and the new one - so it always makes me smile when I see it!
(Plus, these BTS videos made it obvious that he is wearing the silver one for promotion and prefers the other one in private. And now look at the paps shots and so-called “private outings with friends” again and look at the watch he is wearing there.)
flowersintheattic254
I’m happy that at least he can wear something that’s special to him personally. Even for a short time.
There is always a “no longer available” post to explain CC Confirmed. As for whether it is special to him? Darren has never indicated that the watch is special to him. That is called MAKING UP A STORY. But from this day forward the fandom will believe that this little queer watch is meaningful to Darren.
The watch is a sporty, more causal-and presumably less expensive- than the watch he has been wearing. Wearing a less expensive, more casual watch while exercising isn’t logical CC reasoning, noooooo, logical CC reason is of course that his team WON’T LET HIM wear it. He has to be sneaky when he wants to express his sexuality through accessories. Also, they claim that he is forced to wear a “paid endorsement” watch most of the time..
ajw720
@flowersintheattic254 it has been almost 5 months since the JH promo began and they essentially stripped him of the rings we know mean the world to him (absolutely intentional, M and RR knew precisely what they were doing when they got that campaign, it was about much more than a free trip to Bali). So I agree, it is good to see him supplement an accessory here and there that is actually meaningful to him. I cannot wait until he is free to just be himself.
Sooooo, I’m not entirely sure why she brought up “JH promo” here, but I read it to mean that the watch that he normally wears is promotion for John Hardy. They have obsessively raged about the John Hardy jewelry since his trip to Bali in September. Yes, I am sure that was a promotional trip. Who cares? He got to spend a week in Bali and all he and Mia had to do was wear some jewelry. Darren seems to enjoy the designs as he has worn them quit a bit since then- UNTAGGED. I honestly never pay attention to these things but the CCers always comment. The thing is, something is only “promotion” on social media if it is tagged. Wearing an untagged ring or bracelet isn’t in anyway promoting the item. Only the most diehard, rage-filled fans recognize the untagged John Hardy pieces. The idea of promotion isn’t simply to get free stuff and wear it on social media, it’s to drive traffic to the John Hardy website and them to get people to actually purchase the pieces. Wearing them untagged doesn’t serve this goal.
But back to the watch...is Darren wearing an (untagged) John Hardy watch as per his endorsement deal?
Uh, NO. There are no John Hardy Watches. If he is wearing a promotional watch for a different brand-he really sucks at it.
Some thoughts on other CC comments:
...they essentially stripped him of the rings we know mean the world to him (absolutely intentional, M and RR knew precisely what they were doing when they got that campaign, it was about much more than a free trip to Bali). So I agree, it is good to see him supplement an accessory here and there that is actually meaningful to him. I cannot wait until he is free to just be himself.
So let’s analyze the facts:
Chris gave him ring(s)? The CCers have long claimed that Chris gave Darren a ring, a ring he often- but not always-wears on his right hand. Over the years, there are I believe, 5 different rings that Darren has worn and all were attributed to Chris until the John Hardy rings were added in September. Why were they attributed to Chris? Literally NO reason whatsoever other than their fantasy. These same people have raged over their claim that Mia has sported 5 different engagement rings in the last year. The rings all look to me like the same diamond ring with other rings added when the mood struck her. CC Mia is horrible for caring so little about her Engagement Ring that she would wear 5 different rings, but Chris is romantic AF for giving Darren 5 rings.
The rings are meaningful to Darren? Darren has NEVER said the rings hold any meaning for him or who they are from that I am aware of. He doesn’t wear them consistently. Seems to me that they are fashion accessories and nothing more. He’s worn the John Hardy’s rings quite a bit since September. Clearly, the CC fandom couldn’t claim the John Hardy rings are from Chris, so they fell back on their favorite excuse: his team “forced” him to wear the rings. I’m never sure exactly how one “forces” another adult to do something. I’ve been married for 24 years, if someone can tell me how to “force” him to do my bidding, I would love it.
One final CC comment on this topic- The Impossible Dream comment
bjpb08
Concur @ajw720. The thing is D has always found a way to fight back, sometimes subtly, sometimes overtly. We have seen it on the frontline, we do not see behind the camera or in the soecifics of his life. Sometimes I am sure he has sat it out, waiting. D has said too many times he is private, social media is not his way of communicating. He seems to pick whatever means he is afforded. Glimpses that we see, I love…it reminds me he is fighting and still remains the human being I so love and support. He is Dar/ren Eve/rett Cri/ss first and formost a son, brother, uncle, cousin, but first and formost a partner to one Chr/is Col/fer. He will do what he needs to do for those he loves. And that includes fighting a foe that we will never know the depth of.
To dream the impossible dream
To fight the unbeatable foe
To bear with unbearable sorrow
To run where the brave dare not go
To right the unrightable wrong
To love pure and chaste from afar
To try when your arms are too weary
To reach the unreachable star
This is my quest, to follow that star
No matter how hopeless, no matter how far
To fight for the right
Without question or pause
To be willing to march
Into hell for a heavenly cause
And I know if I’ll only be true
To this glorious quest
That my heart will lay peaceful and calm
When I’m laid to my rest
And the world will be better for this
That one man scorned and covered with scars
Still strove with his last ounce of courage
To fight the unbeatable foe
To reach the unreachable star
Songwriters: Joe Darion / Mitchell Leigh
The Impossible Dream lyrics © The Bicycle Music Company, Helena Music Company
I believe D would not agree. This song always comes back to haunt me in relationship to D. He lives it, he breathes it, he feels it on a daily bases. Soon he will find he will reach the reachable star.
D has always found a way to fight back, sometimes subtly, sometimes overtly? Yes, because the CC fandom literally fabricated all of these things he did to “fight back”. The things are “subtle” because the fandom made them up...they are overt because they made them up. As long as CCers continue to make up claims about what he is doing and how it represents a ‘fight”, Darren will continue to “fight” back in ways that are asinine. He will continue to hide deep In the closet while sending the CC fandom subtle messages of his “truth”. He will continue to walk the red carpet with Mia and take her to awards shows where he says nice things about her. He will continue to be a straight bro, to wear John Hardy jewelry and play piano at Tramp Stamp Granny’s BECAUSE THAT IS WHO HE IS. The CC fandom will continue to claim that everything he does that we see and everything he says that we hear- is all fake or forced upon him by this team while he lives a secret queer life with his husband Chris Colfer. A life we cannot see or hear BECAUSE IT ISN’T REAL, it’s pure CC fantasy. And his story will continue to be something only they are paying enough attention to see it because they are the ones writing it.
D has said too many times he is private, social media is not his way of communicating. He seems to pick whatever means he is afforded. This is literally an argument for why he isn’t secretly communicating with the CC fandom via social media.
Isn’t it convenient that “he seems to pick whatever means we fabricate he is afforded”? He will always “conveniently” do whatever fits the CC fantasy...that is how it works when you are writing the fanfiction as you go.
Is Darren’s life The Impossible Dream? The CC fantasy about love conquering all and CrissColfer being “a love for the ages” is how tweens and young teens believe love works. It is fodder for fanfiction and the best rom-coms, Twilight and Disney Princess-esque romance novels, but it isn’t real life. Real life is messy and hard. Love rarely survives even the most mundane stressors of life, it would never survive
9 years of hiding from the world while the spotlight is focused directly on it
9 years of being apart and pretending to love someone else
9 years of overt lying about Darren’s sexuality and his life
9 years of traveling with someone else and sharing his life with Mia with the world
9 years of mundane real-life stressors while hiding
Add on Chris’s mom’s death, his dad’s remarriage, his sister’s illness, Chuck’s divorce, and all of the things we don’t know about
Love doesn’t save people from life’s difficult moments. Love certainly doesn’t excuse deception and lies. Darren isn’t gay because he wears a PINK and blue watch.
#CC#CCEr#CCerrs#CC fanom#CC blog#CC family#CrissColfer#Darren Criss#chris colfer#gay watch#fanfiction#CC fanon#CC fandom#Pink isn't gay#Pink watches aren't gay
5 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Anyone got cereal recommendations? . . . . . . . #mymakeup #travelquotestoliveby #viennafood #ontheblog #writetotravel #iloveparis #dreamchaser #neverstopexploring #makeupdaily #igersvienna #traveldestination #chaseyourdreams #travelquoteoftheday #instablog #makeupcollection #traveldiaries #lovevienna #encouraged #encourageyou #dreamer #parisfood #exploreparis #encouragesomebody #blogginggals #aesthetic #aesthetic #aestheticedits #cereal #foodie #foodiesofinstagram (at Santa Monica, California) https://www.instagram.com/p/CCErR-8ArCn/?igshid=gd8ef8rt32iy
#mymakeup#travelquotestoliveby#viennafood#ontheblog#writetotravel#iloveparis#dreamchaser#neverstopexploring#makeupdaily#igersvienna#traveldestination#chaseyourdreams#travelquoteoftheday#instablog#makeupcollection#traveldiaries#lovevienna#encouraged#encourageyou#dreamer#parisfood#exploreparis#encouragesomebody#blogginggals#aesthetic#aesthetic#aestheticedits#cereal#foodie#foodiesofinstagram
0 notes
Text
California Attorney General Files Lawsuit Against Horse Rescue/Veteran Charity
Warning: Have you donated to the Central Coast Equine Rescue and Retirement or the Wounded Warriors Support Group recently?
The Central Coast Equine Rescue and Retirement (CCERR) and Wounded Warriors Support Group (WWSG) are facing a civil lawsuit brought on by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra. The two charities claim to rescue abused horses and provide therapeutic horseback riding to wounded military veterans. But according to Becerra, none of that is true. Becerra alleges that the two charities scammed the…
View On WordPress
#attorney general#California#Central Coast Equine Rescue and Retirement#Gregory#Wounded Warriors Support Group#Xavier Becerra
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Does R.Kelly have a Morals Clause #MuteRKelly
TMZ has a story about RCA/Sony putting R.Kelly’s new music on hold for now as the fallout continues to reign down from the Lifetime Docu-series Surviving R Kelly. Kelly was in the studio working on his newest album.
According to TMZ:
RCA/Sony is in a tough spot -- they can read the tea leaves and know they will have hell to pay in terms of PR if they release R. Kelly's songs in the wake of the growing #MuteRKelly movement.
On the other hand, the label has a deal with R. Kelly, and if they formally walk away from him now without any criminal charges to justify ending the contract ... they could be sued. We don't know if there's a "morals clause" in R. Kelly's contract ... which would allow the label to give him the boot for crossing the line.”
I point this out because it describes the proper way that a moral’s clause is used. morality clause’s allow companies to ascribe certain actions such as termination or suspension if the employee (usually actors, athletes and singers) behaves in a manner that falls within the contract parameters of immoral behavior including e.g. illegal behaviors, certain sex acts, and drugs.
Morality clauses can define improper behavior with a wide definition
"If at any time, in the opinion of Sponsor, Athlete becomes the subject of public disrepute, contempt, or scandal that affects Athlete's image or goodwill, then Company may, upon written notice to Athlete, immediately suspend or terminate this Endorsement Agreement and Athlete's services hereunder, in addition to any other rights and remedies that Sponsor may have hereunder or at law or in equity." (X)
or it can be more specific
“If at any time during the Term Athlete is convicted of a felony or pleads guilty or 'no contest' to a felony, then Company may, upon written notice to Athlete, suspend or terminate this Agreement and Athlete's services hereunder, in addition to any other rights and remedies that Sponsor may have hereunder or at law or in equity." (X)
In R.Kelly’s situation, a morality clause that covered ambiguous immoral behaviors or more specifically, sleeping with underage girls, would potentially allow RCA/Sony to end their contract without paying out for the final two albums on R.Kelly’s contract. Without a morality clause, they are more likely to be on the hook until there is a conviction. Now let’s be real, there will likely be a conviction, we have all known for decades that R.Kelly has behaved immorally and illegally when it comes to young girls. He has been a pedophile at least since he married 15-yo Aaliyah, in 1994.
To all the CCerrs who claim that Darren signed a morality clause back in 2010 which keeps him deeply in the closet there are many reasons we know this is simply not true. The biggest reason is that this isn’t how majority clauses work. Morality clauses as I described above, are used to give the studio power in the event the actor breaks the clause- it gives them the ability to end or curtail their professional relationship. It doesn’t allow a studio to control perfectly legal behavior. Certain sex acts can be included in the list of topics covered in many morality clauses-see R.Kelly. We all know that being out of the closet isn’t about sex. It is about one’s sexual identity. Since the SCOTUS ruling on gay married, same-sex love is no longer immoral in the eye of the courts, making it impossible for a studio to uphold such a clause.
But there are other reasons:
Glee ended 4 years ago and with it, his contract and any morality clauses that were signed. Studios haven’t paid actors to remain under contract between projects since the 1960′s.
CA law allows employment contracts to extend no longer than 7 years.
If Darren was under contract with a morality clause that kept him in the closet, he would have all of the power. In this age of #MeToo all it would take is a call to the incredible Ronan Farrow, and Darren would have FoxStudio begging for mercy. The PR fallout would be brutal.
Same for Ryan Murphy except Ryan has spent his life creating safe place for queer actors and creative types to tell queer stories. His life’s work would be destroyed if that kind of story came out giving Darren unbelievable power in this scenario.
Darren isn’t under a morality clause with Fox Studios that keeps him in the closet or from interacting on social media or in public with Chris. This is just another fabricated story that is used to cover for the truth that Chris and Darren no longer have a public relationship and Darren is straight. If you respect Darren, then HEAR his truth when he tells you his sexual identity. Listen to his words. Just as you want people to LISTEN when you speak, Darren deserves your undivided attention when he talks so that you can hear him loud and clear. He has never suggested he was queer; he has been very clear and very adamant that he is straight. This isn’t about identifying a fake “PR narrative” or matching social media posts...this is about Darren’s raw words and your own misguided fantasies.
6 notes
·
View notes
Note
With the "GA not buying it" they mean that there's a fair amount of people going "wait he's straight???" and "I thought he was gay!!!", which makes total sense given his most prominent roles. Like, I was also momentarily baffled when I saw that Hedwig understudy Mason has a girlfriend - I had 100% just assumed he was gay. But that doesn't mean I'm not "buying" his relationship, it just means my assumption based on a very peripheral awareness of him was wrong.
The GA believing he is gay is also proof that the “teenage heartthrob” marketing theory is not true.
Of course it is easy to believe he is gay- he has very effectively played two gay roles on TV. The CCerrs are desperate to believe that somebody besides them finds the whole thing a farce and it just isn’t sticking no matter how many crap they fling. The wedding post on IG is his most “like” post ever.
2 notes
·
View notes