#BearingArms

[quotesdir]

Thomas Jefferson

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Read the full article

[eric-sadahire]

Please Jesus, protect me from your followers.

[northcountyshootingcenter]

'Collaborative Effort in California Shines Light on Gun Control Group’s False Claims'

Read full article via @bearingarms

➡️ https://tinyurl.com/yc4wpptm

[gaadipart]

Register your Shop now..🚘🚘🚘 Log on to https://www.gaadipart.com . . . . #bearings #bearing #bearingwitness #BearingArms #BEARINGz #bearingballs #bearingfruit #bearingfruits #bearinggoodfruit #bearingnet #bearingedges #bearingjam #bearingrid #bearingedgecutting #BEARingTheCold #bearingwa #bearingedge https://www.instagram.com/p/CiJa6PBhyGl/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

[tntmtheshow]

#lol #bearingarms #news #secondamendment #nunchucks #michelangelo #tmnt #nerds #teenagemutantninjaturtles #nerdy #talknerdytome #TNTM https://www.instagram.com/p/B4s1PSFldOF/?igshid=1nfl3dyzijl8m

[bearingarmscom-blog]

Heading to #shotshow2017? Don't miss the chance to meet Katie Pavlich, Julie Golob, Mark Kayser and Bearing Arms editor... ME! #2a #gunrights #murica #secondamendment #bearingarms #goodguys #goodgals #armedandready #assaultandflattery #outdoorlife #nssf #shootingsports

[kmcconnell17ahs-blog]

Getting Started

The subject of the blog that I choose talks about the NRA, (national Rifle Association) getting congress to review the Obama administration final step in banning fire arms to American citizens. The author of the post was by Bearingarms. com staff. These peoples view of firearms are obviously pro-second amendment. The context of the Article was to inform people who are concerned about the issue, or are concerned about the 2nd amendment rights. There are bits and pieces of the article that gives the authors point of view, but I would not call it a opinionated article. The intended audience of the blog was for people who want to bear arms and have a vested interest in wanting to know about the issue at hand concerning the second amendments validity. It is more of an informative article rather than picking a side of weather the person is right of wrong. But I am a supporter of the second amendment and I would like to see it stand. The author is definitely a strong believer in the 2nd amendment. He/she doesn't say it directly but the word choice in some sentences tells the reader that they are against Obamas plan of fire arm bans. The significance of the article is that there strict limits that the government has to deny citizens their 2nd amendment rights. It appears that the NRA is predicting a slippery slop had that law been enacted, Because what group would be label next for denial for second amendment rights. The article itself is reliable due to the fact that the author uses reliable sources and quotes. I would agree with the side of the article. The reason being is because I don't want to have any of my rights suppressed or denied. I would like to follow this blog. Reason being is because they have reliable information and there blogs interest me. On tumblr I am following blogs that pertain to the issues of guns and gun right. I feel that is is very important to have both sides of the argument . I am following Anti-gun, anti-gun and Pro abortion, bearingarms, ourgunrights, guns-and -freedom. I have read a little bit from each blogger and all of them are saying expected things to the issue. I will find it to be more interesting reading the opposing side of fire arms to see why they don't approve of guns. 

[iamvirgostarlight]

Virginia Delegates Decide Since You Won't Go To The Hood They'll Bring The Hood To You

When Michael Bloomberg flooded Virginia state legislative contests with his anti-gun groups' cash he got a quid pro quo from victorious Democrats: a near ban of AR-15s and a promise of more anti-gun laws. 

Now, to make room for all the felons who are predicted to be arrested by cops and the Virginia National Guard, whom the governor has been urged to deploy, Democrats are demanding more money for prison space and law enforcement. Taking guns and making you pay for it is the ultimate gut punch. 

Law Enforcement Today reports that a $250,000 increase in taxes would enforce these areas: Allow the removal of firearms from persons who pose substantial risk to them or others- $50,000 Prohibit the sale, possession, transport of assault firearms, trigger activators and silencers- $50,000 Increase the penalty for allowing a child to access unsecured firearms – $50,000 Prohibit possession of firearms for persons subject to final orders of protection- $50,000 Require background checks for all firearms sales- $50,000 Law Enforcement Today reports that the plethora of new gun-grabbing laws are purposely vague and will not sit well with cops and the public: 

 "The laws that have already been passed, along with those which have been introduced for the next legislative session in Virginia would ban commonly owned semi-automatic firearms, such as the AR-15. Further, the ban would extend to common firearms parts, and would NOT grandfather current owners. So, if you live in Virginia and own an AR-15, once the legislation is signed by Northam, you would be required to surrender the weapon, or face arrest and incarceration. Law-abiding gun owners who are found in possession of an “assault firearm” could be convicted of a Class 6 felony, which is punishable by up to 5 years in prison." 

 But the AR-15 near-ban is only the beginning. There will be gun-buying rationing and limitations on ammo contained in the proposed laws. Dozens of townships and municipalities have declared themselves as Second Amendment Sanctuaries before the Democratic gun-grabbers go nuts, as promised, in the upcoming legislative session. Cam Edwards, of BearingArms, warns that there are a lot of phony stories about the proposed laws, so one should be armed with the facts. Still, he warns this could get ugly if Democrats once again use muscle to keep people from their constitutionally protected rights:

Link to Article

[thewebofslime]

ARCHIVE ED MORRISSEY SHOW NEWSLETTERS × New scapegoat for Hillary Clinton loss: Huma Abedin?SHARE ON FACEBOOKSHARE ON TWITTER New Scapegoat For Hillary Clinton Loss: Huma Abedin? ED MORRISSEYPosted at 9:31 pm on December 14, 2016 SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER 0 “The knives are out in Clintonworld,” Vanity Fair’s William Cohan writes, and they may take aim at a surprising target. Allahpundit touched on this earlier today, but it’s worth highlighting as part of the Democrats’ attempts to avoid blaming the one woman who really did lose the election. SEE ALSO: Captain Marvel isn’t awful but it’s not top-tier Marvel either (some spoilers) Few have been as close to Hillary Clinton as Huma Abedin over the last 25 years, or as quietly dedicated to protecting her boss. Now that Hillary has blown a winnable election, Cohan writes, critics have focused the blame on her inner circle for keeping her too protected — and no one’s more an insider than Abedin: TRENDING: Justice Alito shatters glass before Congressional testimony “Maybe I’m just pissed off, but I really don’t give a shit about what happens to Huma to be honest with you,” one close adviser to Hillary Clinton told me recently. He was irked, in particular, at Abedin’s seemingly superfluous breach of decorum during a post-election event. On the day after Hillary Clinton’s stunning loss to Donald Trump, this person said, Abedin appeared within the rope line while Clinton greeted her morose and woebegone supporters. “You’re staff, O.K.?” this adviser continued. “Staff is staff. You’re not a principal.” … But amid Clinton’s stunning post-election hangover, some inside the inner circle wonder if Abedin became overwhelmed by the attention, and shut too many people out. “She was enjoying the red carpet and enjoying the photo spreads much too much in my opinion,” one Clinton insider told me. “She enjoyed being a celebrity too much.” The close Clinton adviser elaborated that Abedin and the other tight-knit circle of people may have suffocated Clinton, preventing the campaign from taking in outside counsel. “The real anger is toward Hillary’s inner circle,” the Clinton insider told me. “They reinforced all the bad habits.” For instance, the suggestion had been made that Clinton should show her gregarious side, by, for instance, appearing more often on The View. (She appeared once, but Bernie Sanders, her rival for the nomination, appeared a handful of times.) According to this person, however, the inner circle nixed that idea. It seemed, this person elaborated, that even minor suggestions about changing the narrative fell on deaf ears. “Right away,” this person continued, “it was either regarded as an intrusion or a naïve suggestion or maybe someone has an agenda. And so people just stopped bothering. Where in most presidential campaigns the circle grows broader and broader, hers grew smaller and smaller.” There may be an argument to be made that Abedin cost Hillary the election in one practical way. Had it not been for Abedin’s careless handling of her e-mail connections, she would not have left thousands of messages on Anthony Weiner’s laptop for the FBI to discover while they investigated his alleged sexting with an underage girl. That prompted James Comey to inform Congress that the FBI found new evidence in the e-mail scandal investigation, which Democrats are blaming for turning last-minute deciders away from Hillary. However, that argument has to rely on a particularly uncomfortable fact: Hillary Clinton created the e-mail scandal in the first place. In fact, her refusal to use the official State Department e-mail system required her inner circle at State to use the home-brew system that intended to keep Congress and the courts from finding Hillary’s communications as Secretary of State. Democrats could argue that Abedin should have been more circumspect in choosing which device to use while accessing it, but that’s like complaining about how the staff arranged the deck chairs on the Titanic while it steamed into an iceberg. Hillary’s the author of all that followed in regard to the e-mails. Otherwise, Abedin makes a poor target for the knives. The slap at Abedin’s love of celebrity is laughable; she barely exists in the media except for her pictures standing by Hillary’s side. She did more when Weiner ran for mayor, but not a whole lot more, and mostly stopped after his second sexting scandal emerged. Apart from that, Abedin has never been a Svengali to Hillary — the authority dynamic runs in the other direction. In fact, that suggestion and the broader accusation that Hillary failed because of a palace guard that insulated her from reality seems almost … sexist. Wasn’t Hillary the “chief executive” of her own campaign? Wasn’t she supposed to be the “most qualified candidate ever,” as Barack Obama and other Democrats claimed? Hillary was “a workhorse, not a show horse,” determinedly superior in judgment and executive ability, her supporters claimed — and accused her critics of misogyny for questioning those claims. (In fact, Hillary’s supporters are still making those accusations.) Now the explanation for the loss is that Hillary couldn’t see past her own administrative assistant or unbox herself from the team she put together. This is just another embarrassing example of denial from Democrats. They nominated an unlikable and incompetent candidate with too much scandal baggage of her own creation, and then alienated even more voters by calling them bigots for noticing. Abedin makes a handy scapegoat for those unwilling to face reality. TAGS:DENIALEMAIL SCANDALHILLARY CLINTONHUMA ABEDINSCAPEGOATVANITY FAIR SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER RELATED STORIES Eric Holder: Maybe we should pack the Supreme Court with two new Democratic justices in 2021 ALLAHPUNDIT Mar 09, 2019 2:31 PM Here we go. Chicago prosecutors are overplaying their hand on Jussie Smollett JAZZ SHAW Mar 09, 2019 1:01 PM It’s a made for TV movie being shot before our eyes TRENDING ON TOWNHALL MEDIA Washington Attorney General Issues Warning To Gun Stores Bearingarms Holy Moly: Trump Triggered The MSM (Again). This Time It Involves Bibles. Townhall Bulwark editor conserves conservatism further by posting selfie of Dan Bongino and … Cindy Yang Twitchy Adam Schiff Proven a Liar As the Bruce Ohr Transcript Is Released Redstate RECENT STORIES Harris: The economy is ‘great’? What about all those working multiple jobs to keep up? ED MORRISSEY Mar 09, 2019 11:31 AM “How are you measuring that?” By, er, measuring that. H.R.1 passes in the House, “For The People Act” DOA in the Senate KAREN TOWNSEND Mar 09, 2019 10:01 AM Long game All but 6 Democrats oppose resolution against illegal aliens voting JAZZ SHAW Mar 09, 2019 8:31 AM Yes. By all means, run on that in 2020 Zachary Greenberg has a history of university jobs and trouble with roommates JOHN SEXTON Mar 08, 2019 8:45 PM “…the subject of a restraining order in 2017 that was requested by one of his roommates” Question for Dem 2020 candidate John Hickenlooper: Are you now, or have you ever been, a capitalist? ALLAHPUNDIT Mar 08, 2019 8:01 PM “I don’t look at myself with a label.” Rotten Tomatoes purged 50,000 negative Captain Marvel ‘reviews’ JOHN SEXTON Mar 08, 2019 7:21 PM “As of 8 a.m., the film had a 33 percent audience score from more than 58,000 reviews.” Ilhan Omar’s newest target: Barack Obama? ALLAHPUNDIT Mar 08, 2019 6:41 PM “We want to recognize the actual policies that are behind the pretty face and the smile.” Wow: Chicago grand jury indicts Jussie Smollett on 16 felony counts of disorderly conduct ALLAHPUNDIT Mar 08, 2019 6:01 PM Bye. TRENDING Justice Alito shatters glass before Congressional testimony Captain Marvel isn't awful but it's not top-tier Marvel either (some spoilers) Maryland Democratic leader calls for doxxing of gun rights activist "terrorists" Zeldin to Dems: Do you really want to know why I'm voting against your "spineless and disgusting" resolution? Eric Holder: Maybe we should pack the Supreme Court with two new Democratic justices in 2021 Chelsea Manning jailed for "not believing in the Grand Jury system" Where have all the men without college degrees gone? More than half of Californians say they plan to leave as state leads U.S. in outmigration Harris: The economy is 'great'? What about all those working multiple jobs to keep up? The people who eat the same meal every day Maryland Democratic leader calls for doxxing of gun rights activist “terrorists” JAZZ SHAW Mar 09, 2019 7:01 PM “Time to dox some homegrown terrorists.” Chelsea Manning jailed for “not believing in the Grand Jury system” JAZZ SHAW Mar 09, 2019 5:31 PM And it’s on with the show, folks Justice Alito shatters glass before Congressional testimony KAREN TOWNSEND Mar 09, 2019 4:01 PM Ice-breaker Home Archive Ed Morrissey Show Newsletters About Advertise Privacy Policy Terms of Use Copyright HotAir.com/Salem Media. All Rights Reserved.

[curre-ignavus]

“I don’t care if he had a gun.” That about sums this shit up doesn’t it? They don’t fucking care about the truth, they want excuses to make demands and tear shit up, even where they live. This movement is filled with hatred and intolerance, and has spawned an acceptance of aspects of domestic terrorism that should not be tolerated.

[txtote3m-blog]

Ice-T says it best! http://bearingarms.com/jenn-j/2016/08/10/famous-rapper-says-guns-are-the-last-form-of-defense-against-tyranny/?utm_content=buffer88770&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer

[freedomsfaction]

#Police in #Buffalo, #NewYork have set forth a plan to begin confiscating the #firearms of legal #gunowners within days of their deaths. This is one more little step that #guncontrol advocates take to inch closer and closer to complete #disarmament. Of course, a #communist government is incompatible with an armed populace. “They’re quick to say they’re going to take the guns,” said Tom King, president of the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association. “But they don’t tell you the law doesn’t apply to long guns, or that these families can sell [their loved one’s] pistol or apply to keep it.” King said enforcing the state law is the latest example of authorities targeting law-abiding gun owners, while doing little to secure the streets. “They’re quick to say they’re going to take the guns.”- Tom King, president of the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association #BuffaloPolice Commissioner Daniel Derrenda said at a press conference last week that the department will be sending people to collect guns that belong to pistol permit holders who had died so “they don’t end up in the wrong hands.” The department will cross reference pistol permit holders with death records and the guns will be collected when possible, he said. Derrenda said guns pose a threat if their owner is no longer alive to safeguard them, especially if a recently-deceased gun owner’s home is burglarized. “At times they lay out there and the family is not aware of them and they end up just out on the street,” he said, according to WGRZ.com. The state law says that if the permit holder dies, the estate has 15 days to dispose of the guns or turn them in to authorities, who can hold the weapons up to two years. LoHud.com reported that violation of the law by survivors is a misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in jail and a fine. Pro-gun websites took Derrenda’s comments as an affront to the #SecondAmendment, with #BearingArms.com claiming authorities could “use the relative’s pistol permit as the proverbial camel’s nose under the tent to get at every firearm they can, hoping to remove all the firearms from the home while the family is at their most vulnerable.”

[northcountyshootingcenter]

🔥 Great article, worth a read & share. 🔥

'Harsh Lessons About Russian Terrorist Attack'

Read full article via @bearingarms:

👉 https://tinyurl.com/yws4kbmp

[jessicalynn006]

[thewebofslime]

ARCHIVE ED MORRISSEY SHOW NEWSLETTERS × About that Podesta ‘underage sex-slaves’ Tweet from Andrew BreitbartSHARE ON FACEBOOKSHARE ON TWITTER About That Podesta ‘Underage Sex-Slaves’ Tweet From Andrew Breitbart LARRY O'CONNORPosted at 10:01 am on December 5, 2016 SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER 0 Nefarious operators on the Internet (as well as some innocent, misinformed individuals) have been freaking out over a Tweet from the late Andrew Breitbart connecting John Podesta to a “underage sex slave” operation. SEE ALSO: Captain Marvel isn’t awful but it’s not top-tier Marvel either (some spoilers) TRENDING: Justice Alito shatters glass before Congressional testimony The reason this Tweet is suddenly getting responded to and re-tweeted thousands of times is because a recent conspiracy theory making the rounds about Podesta and the Clintons accuses the Democrat power-players of running an underage sex operation out of a pizza joint in DC. It’s the kind of story you’d find on the cover of Weekly World News (think “Bat Boy” and “Aliens visit Ross Perot before election” kind of stories) and other supermarket tabloids before the advent of the Internet. There are tons of websites who make a lot of money doing pretty odious things. One of those odious things is to purposely pass along fake stories to suck people in and make them think that even though a story seems completely unbelievable on its face, it’s true because it appears to have a legitimate news organization behind it. I know because once I was faked out for about 45 minutes by a story that I discovered on the Boston Globe’s website. (It had apparently originated on a satirical site) Another odious thing many websites do is to make money speculating about Andrew Breitbart. Some of them pass false conspiracy theories about Andrew being murdered by government operatives. Others spend thousands and thousands of words speculating about what Andrew would have thought, said or done about something happening in the current news cycle. The last thing I want to do is be that guy who tells you what Andrew thought or meant back when he was alive because everyone who interacted with him at the time has their own personal experience and not one of them is the whole truth. However, because of the confusion over this Tweet, I think some context and an explanation is called for. And, for some reason, Breitbart News has not stepped up and delivered it themselves. (I searched, if they have, I will update this column post haste.) Here is the text of Andrew’s Tweet, again: How prog-guru John Podesta isn’t household name as world class underage sex slave op cover-upperer defending unspeakable dregs escapes me. It’s a classic Andrew Tweet. His abbreviations, his invention of words (“cover-upperer”) tells me that this was probably Andrew’s work. I never really knew him to allow anyone to Tweet on his behalf but I suppose it’s possible at some point he did so without my knowledge. So, for our discussion let’s stipulate that it was Andrew who sent this out. What is he talking about? Anyone who knew Andrew well and worked closely in his sphere and knew what he would talk and Tweet about with regard to “underage sex slave(s)” and John Podesta, knows exactly what he is referring to: ACORN If you don’t remember James O’Keefe, Hanna Giles and the ACORN story that broke on Andrew’s Big Government website in 2009, here’s a quick description via Wikipedia,which has a lot of bogus takes on the story, but this brief description is correct: In July and August 2009, Giles and O’Keefe visited ACORN offices in Baltimore, Washington, D.C., Brooklyn, San Bernardino, San Diego, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, and Miami. Giles dressed as a prostitute, while O’Keefe wore white khakis with a blue dress shirt and/or tie and claimed to be her boyfriend. Giles and O’Keefe recorded the encounters using hidden cameras and pretended to be seeking advice on how to run an illegal business that included the use of underage girls in the sex trade. So the ACORN story that Andrew was intimately involved with, helped define his brand, and catapulted him into the media spotlight was a story about an underage sex slave operation. OK? So how does Podesta factor in as a “cover-upperer” of the ACORN sex slave story? Here’s the explanation from liberal Think Progress in 2009, a site overseen by John Podesta at that time as he was the head of Center for American Progress (CAP): In response to recently released videos of ACORN staff engaging in inappropriate and potentially unlawful activity, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said today that “the conduct you see on those tapes is completely unacceptable.” ACORN President Bertha Lewis released a statement explaining that the advocacy group for low- and moderate-income Americans will now conduct a “thorough review” of the organizations’ operation. CAP President John Podesta, who also sits on ACORN’s Advisory Council, said, “Accountability starts with knowing all the facts. ACORN, which is doing important work in advocating for lower-income Americans all across this country, is taking an important step today by acknowledging its need for reform and demonstrating its desire to take corrective action.” Yeah, talk about the fox watching the hen house. To prove ACORN did nothing wrong in the O’Keefe/Giles videos presented on Andrew’s website they asked Podesta, a partisan hack who sat on their own Advisory Council to investigate them. Here was Andrew’s take at the time in his Washington Times column: The next day, Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta, the Democratic Party’s top fix-it guy with control over much of the left’s well-funded vast attack machinery (think George Soros, the Tides Foundation, et al.), was among a small advisory group placed in charge of investigating the matter. With the mainstream media continuing to ignore the evidence on the tapes, Mr. Podesta is now clearly in charge of feeding them information about his well-structured investigation into the investigators. The ACORN internal probe is a “war room” aimed at destroying the messengers and is not meant to clean up major corruption. Since Mr. Podesta was appointed to investigate ACORN, the only thing investigated has been the investigators, Mr. O’Keefe, Ms. Giles and the publisher of the journalism behind it, yours truly. Of course, his conclusions were that ACORN did nothing wrong and all the fault in the story lay at the feet of Breitbart. A conclusion picked up by Media Matters for America, a left-wing activist site that made it their goal in life to destroy Andrew Breitbart. MMfA turned the ACORN story into a cudgel with which to beat Andrew over the head, and did so hundreds of times, in an attempt to discredit anything he did. When the Anthony Weiner story first broke it was MMfA who pointed to ACORN as a reason why he should not be trusted and they pointed to the Podesta report as “evidence” for that theory. MMfA, not coincidentally, began their operations in office space borrowed from… wait for it…. John Podesta. So, who is John Podesta? He runs the Center for American Progress think tank, which in 2004 helped launch Media Matters for America, the well-funded watchdog outfit run by ex-conservative journalist David Brock, which feeds the media reams of anti-conservative documents that attempt to diminish the credibility of alternative media outlets. Here are Andrew’s words, again, from 2009: Both the CAP and Media Matters sites are focusing their attention on Ms. Giles, Mr. O’Keefe and me. Does anyone really think Mr. Podesta is investigating ACORN, when his well-greased external machinery is so blatantly investigating us? So get into Andrew’s head for a moment circa Feb, 2011. His entire sphere of reference at that time with regard to Podesta was in the context of his role creating left wing activist groups like CAP, ACORN and MMfA. Podesta had just joined the Obama Administration. Andrew was tweaking the media for giving Podesta a pass and celebrating the man who Andrew saw as his bete noir. And one of the most outrageous things Podesta did to Andrew, that the media never scrutinized, was his white-washing of the ACORN scandal. In other words, from Andrew’s perspective, Podesta was a “world class underage sex slave op cover-upperer defending unspeakable dregs .” That’s what the Tweet means, and anyone who tells you otherwise is up to something. TAGS:ACORNANDREW BREITBARTJOHN PODESTASEX SLAVETWEETTWITTERUNDERAGE SEX SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER RELATED STORIES Eric Holder: Maybe we should pack the Supreme Court with two new Democratic justices in 2021 ALLAHPUNDIT Mar 09, 2019 2:31 PM Here we go. Chicago prosecutors are overplaying their hand on Jussie Smollett JAZZ SHAW Mar 09, 2019 1:01 PM It’s a made for TV movie being shot before our eyes TRENDING ON TOWNHALL MEDIA Washington Attorney General Issues Warning To Gun Stores Bearingarms Holy Moly: Trump Triggered The MSM (Again). This Time It Involves Bibles. Townhall Bulwark editor conserves conservatism further by posting selfie of Dan Bongino and … Cindy Yang Twitchy Adam Schiff Proven a Liar As the Bruce Ohr Transcript Is Released Redstate RECENT STORIES Harris: The economy is ‘great’? What about all those working multiple jobs to keep up? ED MORRISSEY Mar 09, 2019 11:31 AM “How are you measuring that?” By, er, measuring that. H.R.1 passes in the House, “For The People Act” DOA in the Senate KAREN TOWNSEND Mar 09, 2019 10:01 AM Long game All but 6 Democrats oppose resolution against illegal aliens voting JAZZ SHAW Mar 09, 2019 8:31 AM Yes. By all means, run on that in 2020 Zachary Greenberg has a history of university jobs and trouble with roommates JOHN SEXTON Mar 08, 2019 8:45 PM “…the subject of a restraining order in 2017 that was requested by one of his roommates” Question for Dem 2020 candidate John Hickenlooper: Are you now, or have you ever been, a capitalist? ALLAHPUNDIT Mar 08, 2019 8:01 PM “I don’t look at myself with a label.” Rotten Tomatoes purged 50,000 negative Captain Marvel ‘reviews’ JOHN SEXTON Mar 08, 2019 7:21 PM “As of 8 a.m., the film had a 33 percent audience score from more than 58,000 reviews.” Ilhan Omar’s newest target: Barack Obama? ALLAHPUNDIT Mar 08, 2019 6:41 PM “We want to recognize the actual policies that are behind the pretty face and the smile.” Wow: Chicago grand jury indicts Jussie Smollett on 16 felony counts of disorderly conduct ALLAHPUNDIT Mar 08, 2019 6:01 PM Bye. TRENDING Justice Alito shatters glass before Congressional testimony Captain Marvel isn't awful but it's not top-tier Marvel either (some spoilers) Maryland Democratic leader calls for doxxing of gun rights activist "terrorists" Zeldin to Dems: Do you really want to know why I'm voting against your "spineless and disgusting" resolution? Eric Holder: Maybe we should pack the Supreme Court with two new Democratic justices in 2021 Chelsea Manning jailed for "not believing in the Grand Jury system" Where have all the men without college degrees gone? More than half of Californians say they plan to leave as state leads U.S. in outmigration Harris: The economy is 'great'? What about all those working multiple jobs to keep up? The people who eat the same meal every day Maryland Democratic leader calls for doxxing of gun rights activist “terrorists” JAZZ SHAW Mar 09, 2019 7:01 PM “Time to dox some homegrown terrorists.” Chelsea Manning jailed for “not believing in the Grand Jury system” JAZZ SHAW Mar 09, 2019 5:31 PM And it’s on with the show, folks Justice Alito shatters glass before Congressional testimony KAREN TOWNSEND Mar 09, 2019 4:01 PM Ice-breaker Home Archive Ed Morrissey Show Newsletters About Advertise Privacy Policy Terms of Use Copyright HotAir.com/Salem Media. All Rights Reserved.