#BUT a lot of it is self admitting non radfem bad actors that excitedly jump in to insult whatever women they can
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
you guys know that pretty much every single political group in history has had the moderate reformists and the radical revolutionaries, right? and that even though they disagree about certain methods, their goal being the same means that they cooperate in order to achieve more attainable short term progress while actions are taken at the same time for long term progress? this is what liberal feminists used to be to radical feminists, the two groups did not hate each other, they just had different outlooks, but generally respected what the other group was trying to (and had some success to) achieve. we lost this dynamic and relationship with the post modern, genderist overtake of liberal feminism, and so it is clear to me that we are in dire need of that role again, with the same repeating schisms in approach that appear under the singular label of radical feminism.
at the very least, we need to establish a differentiation in reformist (i don't mean surface level equality feminism, but looking at practicality and realistic, incremental actions, and harm reduction for women while the other group is more about instant action towards the big picture of abolishment of the system, which won't occur tomorrow or any time soon considering most of the world is NOT radical feminists) and revolutionary radfems purely for the sake of having that instant understanding of how the other faction thinks, and not having these aggressive arguments over and over again when it is clear that it's not a misunderstanding or hypocrisy or bigotry (well, sometimes it is, but i mean the core issue), but a fundamental difference in worldview that is unlikely to heavily change with defensive and highly tense online debates that keep happening over and over.
this is all i'm going to say for this round of 'oh my god everything is imploding again'. this is also not saying anything specific about certain people or making judgement upon individual incidents on either side, i'm not getting into that. just a general thought after looking at repeating patterns of conflict.
#this is one of the main reasons why i don't get involved#i think both groups are correct in their core beliefs but just serve different necessary purposes#the best comparison i can think of is the hong kong protests#they had a group that fought directly with the police#and another group that didn't want to do that but instead provided supplies first aid shelter and great pr#or the two factions of the civil rights movement#i'm genuinely not both sidesing this though i do think both sides go too far with the insults and bad faith interpretations#BUT a lot of it is self admitting non radfem bad actors that excitedly jump in to insult whatever women they can#plenty are self proclaimed radfems though so i won't place all of it on them#but yeah i genuinely think both sides have not just valid but correct and necessary points that many don't seem to understand#that they can exist and not contradict
31 notes
·
View notes