#American Institute for Cancer Research recommendations

[jasonpdoherty37]

The Benefits of a Vegetarian Diet in Fighting Cancer

// PINTEREST https://tinyurl.com/thgpin // INSTAGRAM https://tinyurl.com/thgins // TWITTER https://tinyurl.com/thgtwt // YOUTUBE https://tinyurl.com/thgtube // SOUNDCLOUD https://tinyurl.com/thgpod

The Benefits of a Vegetarian Diet in Fighting Cancer Are you considering switching to a vegetarian diet? There are many health benefits to eating more plant-based foods, including a lower risk of developing cancer. In this blog post, we’ll explore the scientific evidence behind the cancer-fighting benefits of a vegetarian diet. A vegetarian diet has become increasingly popular in recent years,…

[metalheadsforblacklivesmatter]

Food deserts and cities bring designed for cars aside.

This is why I hate the other countries making fun of Americans for being overweight.

The United States paid nutritionists to do research and recommend a healthy daily diet. Then threw said recommendations because milk and cereal companies paid them money to consider them essential food groups.

Then put it in every school textbook and told kids that's how you're supposed to be healthy.

We were fucked from the very beginning by our own government.

Dr. Light’s initial suggestions, as well as the subsequent changes made by the USDA, are best explained in her own words: “Where we, the USDA nutritionists, called for a base of 5-9 servings of fresh fruits and vegetables a day, it was replaced with a paltry 2-3 servings (changed to 5-7 servings a couple of years later because an anti-cancer campaign by another government agency, the National Cancer Institute, forced the USDA to adopt the higher standard). Our recommendation of 3-4 daily servings of whole-grain bread and cereals was changed to a whopping 6-11 servings forming the base of the Food Pyramid as a concession to the processed wheat and corn industries. Moreover, my nutritionist group had placed baked goods made with white flour – including crackers, sweets, and other low-nutrient foods laden with sugars and fats – at the peak of the pyramid, recommending that they be eaten sparingly. To our alarm, in the ‘revised’ Food Guide, they were now made part of the Pyramid’s base.”

(Weight isn't an indication of worth, and not everyone is able to be skinny. I'm just pointing out that the government literally lied to us about what's considered a healthy diet. It's no wonder that no one knows what a healthy diet looks like.)

-fae

[freehawaii]

YOUNG HAWAIIANS & PACIFIC ISLANDER ADULTS WITH HIGHEST CANCER RATES

NBC News - May 19, 2023

New research shows that Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders between the ages of 20 and 49 have the highest death rates from any type of cancer among all racial groups of that age bracket. 

The findings, published last month by the National Cancer Institute, weren’t immediately apparent in previous research because federal data has traditionally grouped together those of Asian, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander descent, concealing the disparities, the report said. 

“We have shown the importance of disaggregating Asian and NHPI individuals, as these groups have disparate cancer mortality rates that are hidden when analyzed together,” researchers wrote. “Policies aimed at equitable cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment, as well as disaggregation of data for racial/ethnic subpopulations are needed to address disparities in cancer mortality across racial/ethnic groups.”

Those of Asian descent, the manuscript pointed out, have the lowest cancer death rates across every age group and, when combined with data on Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders, the death rate largely ended up reflecting the low incidence of the disease among Asian Americans 

While the Office of Management and Budget disaggregated the Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander populations from Asian Americans in 1997, the National Center for Health Statistics didn’t release single-race mortality data until almost two decades later, when all states implemented the new classification on death certificates, the report said. Therefore, data on Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders, who represent an estimated 0.4% of the U.S. population, remained “masked.”

The report, which also looked at cancer death rates across other racial groups, showed additional disparities. Data on cancer mortality rates among males showed Black men with the highest numbers, followed by whites and Latinos. In looking at women, the mortality rates were highest among Black women. Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander women came second, followed by white females. 

High cancer death rates in Black, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander communities are likely  due in part to unequal access to health care, the report said. Marginalized communities are also more likely to receive “suboptimal” cancer treatment that may not be consistent with the recommended clinical practice guidelines, and are less likely to be included in clinical trials, the report noted. 

Structural racism was another underlying cause of the racial and ethnic gaps in health. The American Cancer Society’s guidelines for cancer prevention, the researchers point out, focus on “modifiable lifestyle factors” like obesity and physical activity. However, Black, Latino, American Inuit, American Indian, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander communities, which have high obesity rates, are more likely to live in communities with food deserts, high rates of economic insecurity and greater barriers to physical activity.

The legacy of U.S. colonization of Hawai`i and the long history of “Western interference” has also contributed to health disparities among the Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander populations, Dr. Loïc Le Marchand, associate director for population sciences at the University of Hawai`i Cancer Center, told NBC News. 

“If we compare Polynesians in the South Pacific and Native Hawaiians, not only is the level of obesity higher [in Native Hawaiians], but the type of obesity is different,” Le Marchand said. “The distribution of fat is different. … It’s not just linked to eating more, but it’s also linked to composition of diet.” 

More disaggregated data and better information on specific populations are critical, Le Marchand said, as they can make a difference in the  decision-making.  And while there are some programs in place in Hawaii and across the country that address these gaps in health care, they are still limited.

“Native Hawaiians have been disadvantaged, understudied ... for many decades,” Le Marchand said. “Those health issues exist and need to be addressed.”

Le Marchand said that when it comes to treating Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander populations and other marginalized groups, it’s “not just funding a program here and there.” Integrating leaders from these communities is critical to dispense appropriate care and treatment, he said.

[quirksphere]

Fluoride Myths and Facts: What You Should Know

Fluoride is a hot topic in health conversations, often surrounded by both strong advocacy and skepticism. It’s widely used in dental care and public water systems to combat tooth decay, but misinformation about its safety and efficacy persists. Here, we’ll debunk some common myths about fluoride and clarify the facts to help you make informed decisions.

Myth #1: Fluoride Is a Harmful Chemical

Fact: Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral found in water, soil, and various foods. It’s not an artificial chemical concocted in a lab. When used in appropriate amounts, fluoride strengthens tooth enamel and helps prevent cavities.

The confusion often arises because anything can be harmful in excessive doses—even water! Regulatory bodies like the World Health Organization (WHO), American Dental Association (ADA), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) ensure that fluoride levels in drinking water and dental products are safe for human use.

Myth #2: Fluoride in Water Causes Fluorosis

Fact: Dental fluorosis, a condition that causes faint white spots on teeth, can occur if excessive fluoride is consumed during childhood when teeth are developing. However, the fluoride levels in public water supplies are carefully regulated to minimize this risk.

In most cases, dental fluorosis is mild and purely cosmetic. Severe fluorosis is rare in regions with regulated fluoride programs. Educating parents about proper fluoride use, like avoiding swallowing toothpaste, can prevent overexposure.

Myth #3: Fluoride Doesn’t Actually Prevent Cavities

Fact: Decades of research and real-world data have shown that fluoride significantly reduces tooth decay. Fluoride works by remineralizing tooth enamel, making it more resistant to acid attacks from bacteria.

According to the CDC, fluoridated water alone can reduce the incidence of cavities by about 25% over a lifetime. Dental products like toothpaste, mouth rinses, and professional treatments amplify this protective effect.

Myth #4: Fluoride Is Linked to Serious Health Issues Like Cancer

Fact: Claims linking fluoride to conditions like cancer, kidney disease, or cognitive impairments are often based on flawed or inconclusive studies. High-quality, peer-reviewed research has consistently found no credible evidence to support these claims when fluoride is used within recommended levels.

For example, the National Cancer Institute states that fluoridated water does not increase cancer risk. Similarly, large-scale studies on human populations have shown no significant link between fluoride exposure and adverse health outcomes.

Myth #5: We Don’t Need Fluoride Anymore Because of Modern Oral Hygiene

Fact: While modern oral hygiene practices, such as regular brushing and flossing, are vital, they’re not always enough to prevent cavities. Fluoride acts as an additional line of defense, especially for populations with limited access to dental care.

In communities where water fluoridation has been discontinued, dental decay rates tend to rise. This underscores fluoride’s importance as a public health measure.

How to Use Fluoride Safely

Here are some tips to maximize the benefits of fluoride while minimizing risks:

Use Fluoridated Toothpaste: Brush twice daily with fluoride toothpaste, but only use a pea-sized amount for children under six to avoid swallowing.

Drink Fluoridated Water: If your community water supply is fluoridated, it’s an easy and safe way to protect your teeth. If not, talk to your dentist about fluoride supplements.

Visit Your Dentist Regularly: Professional fluoride treatments can provide added protection, especially if you’re at high risk for cavities.

Conclusion

Fluoride is a proven, effective tool in the fight against tooth decay. While myths and misinformation can be concerning, the scientific consensus is clear: fluoride, when used responsibly, is both safe and beneficial. Educating yourself with evidence-based information is the best way to ensure you and your family enjoy optimal oral health.

If you have concerns about fluoride, speak with a trusted dental professional who can address your questions and help you make the best choice for your oral care.

By staying informed, you can confidently embrace fluoride’s benefits and maintain a bright, healthy smile for years to come!

[ilmahuda]

HEALTH BENEFITS OF MUSHROOMS🍄

✨*_Health benefits of mushrooms*_

Mushrooms are a fungus, but that hasn’t deterred most Americans from adding them to meals. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the average American eats approximately three pounds of mushrooms a year. And now there’s even more reason to work mushrooms into your diet.Mushrooms bring a savory flavor to meals without adding much fat, calories or sodium. But the health benefits don’t stop there. Researchers continue to uncover how mushrooms can ward off chronic disease and improve your everyday health.

*1. Decrease the risk of cancer*

A review of 17 cancer studies from 1966 to 2020 shows that eating just 18 grams of mushrooms (equal to about a 1/8-cup or two medium mushrooms) a day may lower your risk of cancer by as much as 45%. Mushrooms are a powerful source of ergothioneine, an amino acid and antioxidant that prevents or slows cellular damage.Some mushroom varieties (such as shiitake, oyster, maitake and king oyster) have higher amounts of ergothioneine. But researchers found that incorporating any variety of mushrooms into your daily diet will lower your risk of cancer.

*2. Lower sodium intake*

Sodium and high blood pressure often go hand in hand. Sodium causes the body to retain excess fluid, which can increase blood pressure. To decrease your sodium intake, consider adding mushrooms to your meals.Mushrooms are naturally low in sodium – an entire cup of white button mushrooms has just five milligrams of sodium. They offer savory flavor that reduces the need for added salt to keep your blood pressure low. A study from the Culinary Institute of American and UC Davis shows that swapping half of the meat for mushrooms in a traditional ground beef recipe can maintain flavor while reducing sodium intake by 25%.

*3. Promote lower cholesterol*

Mushrooms make an excellent substitute for red meat while minimizing calories, fat and cholesterol. Research shows that shiitake mushrooms, in particular, help to keep cholesterol levels low. They contain compounds that inhibit the production of cholesterol, block cholesterol from being absorbed and lower the overall amount of cholesterol in your blood.

*4. Protect brain health*

Researchers continue to study the effects of eating mushrooms on mild cognitive impairment (MCI). MCI causes memory and language difficulties and is often a precursor to Alzheimer’s disease.In a study in Singapore, participants who ate more than two cups of mushrooms a week had a 50% lower risk of developing MCI. Even those who ate only one cup saw some benefit. The mushrooms eaten by participants included golden, oyster, shiitake and white button mushrooms.

*5. Provide a source of vitamin D*

Vitamin D helps your body absorb calcium to maintain and build strong bones. Many people rely on supplements or sunshine to get vitamin D, but if you’re looking to get this nutrient through your diet, mushrooms may be the answer. They are the only type of produce that is a source of vitamin D.Like humans, certain mushrooms exposed to UV light or sunlight can increase their vitamin D amounts. White button, portabella and cremini mushrooms provide the most vitamin D after exposure to UV light or sunlight. To get the recommended daily amount, slice three mushrooms (or one portabella), expose them to sunlight for at least 15 minutes and enjoy. Eating a little more than one cup of maitake mushrooms achieves the same goal without the need for sun exposure.

*6. Stimulate a healthier gut*

The microbiome in your gut is home to organisms and bacteria that play a large role in your health and mood. One way to keep your gut healthy is to stimulate the growth of healthy bacteria in that space with the use of prebiotics, such as mushrooms.Research shows that mushroom polysaccharides, their most abundant carbohydrate, stimulate the growth of healthy bacteria. While many foods break down with stomach acid, the polysaccharides found in mushrooms pass through the stomach unchanged and can reach the colon to encourage bacteria growth there.

By Ilma huda

Roll no -22/5665

[pooma-islam]

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲: Key to a Healthy and Balanced Life

𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻

In today’s fast-paced world, maintaining good health is more challenging yet more essential than ever. A fundamental factor in achieving lasting wellness is discipline across all areas of life. This report delves into the importance of discipline for physical, mental, and emotional well-being. By reviewing data and insights from health and psychology research, we will explore how incorporating discipline into daily routines can create lasting health benefits.

𝗨𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵

Discipline is a foundation for making positive health choices that reduce risks of lifestyle-related diseases. Studies show that disciplined habits, including a balanced diet, regular exercise, quality sleep, and stress management, significantly enhance physical and mental well-being.

𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀:

1.𝗣𝗵𝘆𝘀𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵:According to the World Health Organization (WHO), disciplined routines, such as regular physical activity, can reduce the risk of heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and certain cancers by up to 30%.

2.𝗠𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵: Data from the American Psychological Association (APA) suggests that individuals who practice self-discipline report 22% higher life satisfaction and are 24% less likely to suffer from mental health issues.

3.𝗟𝗼𝗻𝗴𝗲𝘃𝗶𝘁𝘆: Research from the National Institute on Aging shows that disciplined lifestyles can increase life expectancy by up to 5 years.

𝗖𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵

1. 𝗗𝗶𝗲𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗻𝘂𝘁𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻

• A disciplined approach to nutrition, including meal planning and mindful eating, prevents overconsumption and supports sustained energy levels. Data from the CDC shows that individuals with consistent meal patterns are 35% less likely to be obese.

2.𝗣𝗵𝘆𝘀𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘁𝘆

• Engaging in regular exercise requires dedication and scheduling. WHO recommends at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity exercise weekly, shown to improve cardiovascular health, muscle strength, and mood.

3.𝗦𝗹𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆

• Consistent sleep schedules and sleep hygiene practices are crucial for cognitive function and overall health. Studies from the National Sleep Foundation indicate that adults with disciplined sleep routines experience 25% fewer issues with anxiety and depression.

4.𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀

• Practicing discipline in mental health care, such as setting boundaries, pursuing hobbies, and mindfulness, supports resilience against stress and burnout. Harvard Health Publishing reports that disciplined mindfulness can reduce stress by up to 28%.

5. 𝗦𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲

• Discipline in relationships-through communication, setting aside quality time, and creating work-life balance-strengthens emotional well-being. The Mayo Clinic notes that disciplined social habits improve happiness and reduce isolation.

𝗕𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗳𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘁𝘆𝗹𝗲

1.Improved Physical Health: Regular exercise and a balanced diet strengthen the immune system, increase energy, and reduce risk factors for numerous diseases.

2.Enhanced Mental Clarity and Focus: Discipline supports goal-setting and productivity, enhancing cognitive abilities and reducing feelings of stress and overwhelm.

3.Greater Emotional Resilience: Emotional discipline, like regulating reactions and maintaining calm, fosters stronger relationships and personal growth.

4.Longevity: Combining all aspects, disciplined lifestyles can lead to healthier, longer lives. Following structured routines can reduce age-related health decline and maintain quality of life.

𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲

Despite the benefits, establishing discipline can be challenging. Common barriers include lack of time, competing priorities, and motivation. Successful individuals often start with small, consistent changes, such as setting specific goals, tracking progress, and practicing self-compassion. Integrating these steps gradually builds habits that make discipline sustainable.

𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻: Discipline as the Cornerstone of Well-being

Discipline in all aspects of life is a powerful tool for achieving and maintaining good health. By focusing on nutrition, physical activity, mental health, and relationships, we can build a balanced, resilient, and fulfilling lifestyle. Consistent, disciplined efforts create a solid foundation for a healthier, happier, and longer life.

𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗮𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀

1.Discipline across all areas of life is essential for physical, mental, and emotional health.

2.Practicing discipline can reduce the risk of chronic diseases, enhance mental clarity, and promote emotional resilience.

3.Simple, gradual changes are often the best way to build a disciplined lifestyle, with benefits that compound over time.

By committing to discipline in daily activities, we empower ourselves to lead balanced, healthy lives that contribute to personal and collective well-being.

[p4557]

Trump Staffing 2025 - The Last Refuge

"Say Hello:

TheLastRefuge@reagan.com

Trump Staffing 2025

October 24, 2024 | Sundance | 200 Comments

For two years I was asked to present thoughts on potential candidates for offices in/around the Trump administration if they can achieve victory in the 2024 election.  Essentially, if Trump wins, “who” would be best in “what” positions?

I was extremely reluctant to put something together like this because ultimately, I look at the challenges with a different perspective. Additionally, I am not confident that key people around Donald Trump fully understand the complexity of the problem, and as a result would not absorb the context of any suggestions I might offer.

However, having spent the past 18 months traveling, quietly tracking (yes, that’s me), methodically researching, looking, listening, digging deep in the places that few understand or pay attention to, and after careful thought, prayer and reflection, I began to think that perhaps a slight change in the presentation might actually be beneficial.

Thus, I began in July of 2024, writing very specifically about who might be best suited for roles and responsibilities. Not from the perspective of the person per se’, but rather from the perspective of a fully understandable context for the position; the reality of what can be pragmatically accomplished, and detailed reasoning for why the challenge they will face exists.

This is a beginning with the end in mind approach.

It is NOT my intent to provide a private list of recommendations. What I wanted to do was set a cornerstone of how each role could, predictably, be anticipated to engage with each challenge; then, ultimately, what I believe they will have to do in order to make progress.

The result was a public series of non-pretending presentations, where all of the traditional civic perspectives that people carried might be challenged.

Roles and responsibilities are only valuable if we define and accept the problem from the same perspective.  It is with that thought in mind that such an undertaking begins.

If successful in the 2024 election, President Trump will have one 4-year term to begin charting a new course within our government.

President Trump cannot be expected to fix or repair all of the damage created within our Constitutional Republic in one term.  However, it is possible for President Trump to set the cornerstones in place that ensure the greatest likelihood of success for a modern restoration.

What we are facing is like the Eye of Sauron in the Hobbit trilogy. I am not going to repeat the background context for how the current landscape was created.  That is available HERE, within the discussion of the Fourth Branch of Government.  Under the CTH category filing system in the right-hand margin, you will now find a sub-category “2025 – Term 2” under the primary category “President Trump.”  All of these articles are there, as published.

The current staffing challenge is about removing the cancerous cells that have been seeded deep within the institutions.

The Intelligence Community created the disease, then used the politicians to sell the cure.

In the era shortly after 9/11, the DC national security apparatus was constructed to preserve continuity of government and simultaneously view all Americans as potential threats. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) were created specifically for this purpose. Then things went sideways…  (more)

The challenge is obviously multifaceted with three infected systems, branches, attacking both domestic and foreign policy against the interests of the American people.

President Trump can address the Executive Branch directly; all other aspects are ancillary to the executive policy.  The Legislative Branch fix is then dependent on We The People, and the Judicial Branch fix is an outcome of both.

Within the staffing question, we must begin with a common understanding.  Domestically we have authorities created by the Patriot Act, ODNI and DHS to contend with.  Externally we have the State Dept and CIA collaboration that also feeds into the larger operational missions of the Intelligence Community.  It is this IC that now dominates all issues of consequence, and it is from this perspective we must first address any restoration context.

♦ Executive Policy – Domestic Consequences. There are five or six key positions, most of them holding deputy positions in support.  Again, this is from my own boots on ground review, real-time research shared, understandings discovered, and earnest challenges identified.

Within the executive branch, directly connected to the office of the presidency, the six primary domestic IC-centric positions of consequence are:

President Trump Emissary – no confirmation needed.

President Trump National Security Advisor – no confirmation needed.

White House Counsel – no confirmation needed.

Director of the Office of National Intelligence (DNI).

Director of the National Security Agency (NSA).

Secretary of the Dept of Homeland Security (DHS)

And then come the Secretary of State (DoS), and the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).  These two are combined because they operate collaboratively as one larger silo with two divisions.

Like a restaurant with a front dining room (State Dept.) and a back kitchen (CIA).  The front is visible, the back is not visible.  The front cannot function without the back, and the back is dependent on the front for business pretenses.  The front is the head, the back is the neck. I am pulling DoS and CIA out of the domestic aspect, along with the Defense Dept (DoD) for a reason that will be identified later.

Overall, each of these BIG silos operates what we call the “National Security” system.  They have smaller silos within them, but generally for the intents of the first few positions, these are the critical parts.  Emissary, NSA, White House Counsel, ODNI and NSA.

Already, you are probably saying, “wait, what is this emissary thing?”   Good.  That’s part of the dropping civics non-pretense.

President Trump had before, and will even more critically need again, an exceptional emissary who can convey his thoughts, words and intents to other people – unincumbered by the system itself.

Without the emissary, the embeds within the current national security system will build walls to keep the office of the president isolated.

Those who retain the silo process as an institutional construct to control events, must be confronted by using a process within a system they cannot control.  The President must be able to reach out from his office without going through the national security matrix. That’s the importance of the emissary.

By now, everyone should understand the Trump Doctrine: “Economic Security is National Security.”  Every successful outcome that benefits Americans comes from the expressed policy of using economics as a tool and a weapon to achieve security, domestically and abroad.

I am going to begin with a discussion of the “Emissary.” Their role, their responsibilities, the challenges they face, the personal characteristics and traits needed, how they interact within the system and a full understanding of exactly how critical this person is for the voice of the office of the president.

Two Big Picture Contextual Articles:

Understand The Fourth Branch

Understand The Trump Doctrine

Next, we begin the specifics. Who should be the emissary?

♦ The Emissary – Without a doubt in my mind, the “emissary” is the most important person President Trump will select.

The Washington DC Intelligence Community (IC) actively work to isolate the office of the president.  This is an almost impossible dynamic to avoid, caused by an entrenched and ideological adversary who has dug themselves deep into the apparatus of government.

The “emissary” is the person who carries the word of President Trump to any person identified by President Trump.  The emissary is very much like a tape recording of President Trump in human form.  The emissary travels to a location, meets a particular person or group, and then recites the opinion of the President.  The words spoken by the emissary, are the words of President Trump.

The IC cannot inject themselves into this dynamic; that is why this position is so valuable.

The emissary then hears the response from the intended person or group, repeats it back to them to ensure he/she will return with clarity of intent as expressed, and then returns to the office of the presidency and repeats the reply for the President.  The emissary recites back exactly what he was /is told.

This process is critical when you understand how thoroughly compromised the full Executive Branch is.  More importantly, this process becomes even more critical when you accept the Intelligence Community will lie to the office of the President to retain their position.

Read this next sentence slowly…. If the Senate confirms a director of an IC silo, then that director is demonstrably going to lie to the office of the President.

The Senate only confirms Intelligence Community leadership who are willing to LIE to THE PRESIDENT.    This is just a factual reality.

If the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) confirms them, they will lie.  That is the main role of the SSCI.

The people who constructed the Silos then metastasized the control rot within them, use the term “continuity of government,” to describe the true role and responsibility of the system.  This is not factually wrong.

Where people go wrong is misunderstanding what the “continuity” is that is being maintained.  Truly, the continuity of government is the priority. However, it’s the continuity of currently corrupt and immoral government we are now maintaining.

The CIA Director will lie to President Trump (they did, remember).  The FBI Leadership will lie to President Trump (they did, remember).  The AG will lie, the DNI will lie, the NSA will lie, and all the deputies therein will lie.

Washington DC puts it this way, you probably heard Bill Barr talking about ad-infinitum.  The IC leadership is responsible for maintaining the “continuity of government” at all costs.  The government is more important than The President.

If the continuity of government is maintained by lying to the office of the President, then so be it.  Or, as James Comey said when justifying his lies to the President and his manipulation on March 20th, 2017: “because of the sensitivity of the matter.”

You can get as angry as you want about this, it’s just the DC system that exists.  We must deal with what exists, not what we would pretend there to be.

If a candidate for an IC position is not willing to lie to the President, the Senate will not confirm him/her.   This is why President Trump needs an emissary.

The role of the emissary is critical, the qualifications for that role are extremely important.

Remember, this person is speaking on behalf of President Trump.  And representing the responding voice with a similar level of clarity.

The emissary must be of incredible moral character.  They must be honest.  The person should be entirely altruistic.  They must have exceptional judgement, possess no ego, be impervious to scrutiny or review. They must maintain themselves at the highest moral standards at all times and exhibit incredible judgement and wisdom.

Due to the nature of the position the emissary is extremely powerful; therefore, a disposition of humility is also critical.  The President must be able to trust this person without reservation or issue.  At the same time, the entire weight of the U.S. Intelligence Community apparatus will seek to compromise the emissary, as they try to put walls around the President who holds silo-busting power.

Honesty, integrity, humility, trustworthiness, unimpeachable character and exceptional judgement, establish the baseline of traits the emissary must possess.

This is a choice that will be deeply important to President Trump.  Fortunately, it is not a position that requires any confirmation or external approval.  Judgement, discernment, wisdom and silence are the strength characteristics.

From my perspective, I can think of only one qualified candidate, Dr Ben Carson.  Quite simply, there’s no one else who carries the level of trust necessary to engage in the role.  However, I could be wrong – I do not know the sum total of the people in the life of President Donald J Trump.

For the next position/person a little-known secret needs to be understood, perhaps revealed.

Within the global intelligence apparatus there is only one nation with tentacles that compare to the Israeli intel operation. The Mossad was created in both mission and specific operational purpose over many decades. They only have one rival, one quiet and almost unknown national intelligence apparatus that is practically more comprehensive than even the 5-eyes system. That nation is Portugal.

The National Security Advisor to the President is another of the key roles within the White House that is critical to defend against the weaponized Intelligence Community.  In a second term as president, we anticipate Donald Trump will again face opposition from both parties in congress and from every created silo operation in the administrative deep state.

Accepting in advance that any appointees to the Executive Branch agencies in charge of the Intelligence System, are not going to be able to change the outcomes from within those agencies, then strategizing how to confront the rogue intelligence state becomes a more honest exercise.

The National Security Advisor is going to have to navigate an intelligence community that is fully weaponized and adverse to the interests of the White House.  Every element of the IC, the “six ways to Sunday” team, will work actively and behind the scenes to undermine the office of the President.  Any attack vectors will be fully exploited, by the IC and nothing should be considered out of bounds.

The leaders of the CIA, FBI, DIA, DHS and NSA will all lie to the President.   That’s what these institutions do now. They are part of the 4th branch of government, and they consider themselves omnipotent due to the structure of the legislative changes and oversight after 9-11.  Notice I left out the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, ODNI, I did that on purpose.

The NatSec Advisor to President Trump is going to have to work through an entirely weaponized fourth branch of government in order to survive it, let alone destroy it.  As a consequence, the Nat Sec Advisor needs to be a person with deep understanding of how the intelligence system inside Washington DC works, as well as carrying a profound distrust for them.

Any person who trusts any product created by the IC should be immediately disqualified from any position in our constitutional government.  Additionally, any person who intentionally maintains the system of pretending (Robert Mueller was honorable etc.), is automatically disqualified.

The National Security Advisor does not need to be confirmed.  The NSA person is unilaterally picked by President Trump, and the entire executive branch was just reminded by SCOTUS that POTUS is in charge of everything.  This should be a big arrow in the quiver of the NatSecAdvisor.

The National Security Advisor is also the chair of the National Security Council (NSC).  The NSC is the working group in the White House specifically tasked with formulating analysis on events from their skills on specific issues.  The National Security Advisor does the NSC hiring and firing.  Trump needs a lot of firing assistance.

When the IC was weaponized by George W Bush and Barack Obama, the DNI fulcrum point was never used much as part of the process.  The DNI sits at the center of all intelligence information and maintains the pivot on the National Security Radar that now sweeps a full circle.

Prior to the Patriot Act the national security radar swept outward from the border looking at national security threats overseas.  Back and forth, back and forth, the radar swept looking for foreign adversaries who might target the USA.  The Patriot Act put a ball joint on the radar that now conducts surveillance sweeps in a circle, including over all Americans.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) was created to be the depository for all intelligence products.   Intelligence assembled on foreign threats (CIA) can be reviewed by domestic handlers (FBI and DHS).   When Bush created the office and later when Obama weaponized the office, they installed people who would just go along with whatever the FBI side and CIA side told them to do.  The ODNI was created to be the stupid pivot man.

However, looking at the system in totality, it is my belief that if a really smart person was in the ODNI position, they could control a great deal and even impede the activity happening both domestically (FBI/DOJ) and abroad (DoS/CIA).   I believe the DNI can crush the system, if the person really looked carefully at their power in the pivot location.

The DNI can control information.  The DNI can starve the beast.

Just like the State Dept and CIA work hand in glove to make a mess of the world, so too can the Nat Sec Advisor and DNI work together to deconstruct the domestic intelligence system.  In this process, information is the key.  The DNI can control the information, making it harder for the IC Silos to lie to the National Security Advisor.

[NOTE: control of information is also why the Director of the National Security Agency is also important.  The Director of the NSA is essentially the librarian for all data.  The librarian can control who enters the library if the right people in the Executive Branch (POTUS, Nat Sec Advisor and ODNI) give the Director of the NSA that power (executive action). More on that later.]

The National Security Advisor (hereafter *NSA) needs to be a person who has a comprehensive understanding of the Silos, and a willingness/desire to take them apart.

The *NSA needs to be exceptionally smart, profoundly insightful, intensely strategic, and with a comprehensive knowledge of the DC system.  The *NSA also needs to be stable from attack by the IC defense system.  The ideal *NSA will have an income from outside government that cannot be impacted by the schemes of the IC. The *NSA also needs to be very stable, grounded, logical and thoughtful.

This set of character traits, in combination with the knowledge needed, disqualifies almost everyone in DC.   Steve Bannon is a chatterbox who doesn’t know when to keep his mouth shut, and he has a massive ego.  Kash Patel is not strategic enough and maintains the pretending game in order to present himself as a man of value.  Peter Navarro is loyal but has some of those key judgement issues that can be exploited by the IC, and he’s not very smart.

Former Nat Sec Advisor Michael Flynn disqualified himself from further consideration by poor judgement.  Don’t forget, Flynn was an agent for a foreign government (Turkey 2016) and never told candidate Trump, thereby setting the Trump administration up for compromise.  Flynn then claims he didn’t see the risk of an FBI interview in his office and never told the White House Counsel of his intent to be interviewed by the FBI.  You cannot claim Flynn is smart and reconcile that with his stupidity.

Lastly, Mike Flynn is a deeply connected friend and associate to General Stanley McChrystal.  I will say no more.

All of the previous names might be good additions to the National Security Council, but no way should any of those names get close to a position where their failure to deliver can cause damage to the larger goal.

As a result, there is a very small field of candidates, very small, who might be able to pull off the role of National Security Advisor.  At the top of that list is probably Devin Nunes.   I qualify with a “probably” because Nunes has one massive Achilles heel in my opinion.

Devin Nunes believes in the intelligence system.  He believes in the FISC and FISA (702).  Nunes believes in large aspects of the surveillance state, and he believes in the roles and responsibilities within government as it pertains to the Intelligence Community.

Nunes believes the system is good, and it is just being operated by bad people. This is where Mr Nunes and I diverge.  However, I am willing to undermine my position and say that perhaps we need a person who believes in government.  Maybe that’s the type of character trait that can be a good benefit.  I don’t know.  Maybe I’m too jaded and just want it all stripped down to nothing.

What I do know, is that Devin Nunes would never intentionally screw stuff up, and he’d never intentionally undermine President Trump.  Nunes is super loyal, and he loves our country.

I don’t know if he would take the job of National Security Advisor (he would probably want CIA director). However, with a strategic partner in the DNI office, Devin Nunes could give us a solid chance.

♦ White House Cousel – There are many very important positions related to the expectations we hold for President Trump.  Having spent years deep inside the actual workings of the current professional DC silos, I can tell you most of those expectations are very challenging to achieve.

In one 4-year term President Trump can set the cornerstone for a reconstruction effort that will take at least 15 years.  [Reference, Team Obama used 18+ years to create it (January 2007 to present)].

My goal is to describe the needs of some critical positions from a very practical, non-pretending, perspective of what happens within specific offices.  I already discussed two critical positions that do not require IC approval (Emissary and NatSec Advisor) now I outline a third, the White House Counsel.

The Office of White House Counsel does not need IC/Senate approval.

The Office of the White House Counsel (WHC) is the gatekeeper to the Office of the President.  The White House Counsel does not represent Donald Trump; the WHC represents the office of the presidency and the person fulfilling the duty of the presidency.   For the interests of an effective White House Counsel, who is president is irrelevant; they are guarding the office.

The WHC is critical because it is the advice and opinion of the lawyer in this role who can completely hamstring a President, block a President and ultimately control a President.  The WHC also party controls access to the Office of the President, if the person seeking access is determined detrimental to the “office of the president.”

Essentially a legal gatekeeper, with the job to protect the office of the President (not Donald Trump the person), the White House Counsel is very critical.  Understanding that lawyers in general are averse to risk, and understanding a White House primary lawyer would be exceptionally averse to risk, most White House counsel office holders are predisposed to create the concentric circles of protection around the office.

The WHC coordinates the collapse of the concentric circles when major crisis unfolds.  Starting on the perimeter the WHC organizes the people who will take responsibility for a major problem, with the goal in mind to keep the collateral damage as far away from the office as possible.  Like a mob lawyer, the consigliere will tell a person when they must take the blame -self immolate- and exit the White House for the good of the office etc.

That said, there was a very important facet to the White House Counsel’s office that failed in Trump’s first term.  This failure cannot be repeated.

In Term-1 the opinion of the White House Counsel was to block all declassification efforts that did NOT have the full support of the Intelligence Community (IC).  The IC always knows the White House is averse to risk and the IC weaponize the fear of the WHC against the office of the President.

The declassification process is a request by an agency, including a superior agency like the President of the United States, to the Intelligence Branch asking for them to release the information. The Intelligence Branch again holds full unilateral control.

If the head of the CIA refuses to comply with the declassification instruction of the President, what can the president do except fire him/her? {Again, GO DEEP} How does the President replace the non-compliant cabinet member?  They have to go through the SSCI confirmation.  See the problem?

In Term-1 the IC message to the WH Counsel was that if Donald Trump declassified any documents, they would use the DOJ (special counsel weapon) to attack the office of the president for “obstructing justice.”  The WHC was fraught with fear over what would happen and demanded that POTUS Trump stop trying to declassify information/documents the IC didn’t support.

The IC was trying to take out Donald Trump and the WHC in essence supported their objective because the WHC was only focused on threat mitigation.  In term-2 these threats are going to be of even greater significance.  The IC is now in a zero-sum game.

The IC has evolved into the superseding, omnipotent 4th branch of government. If Trump wins, the IC are potentially going to be removed or at least greatly diminished.  Ergo, the IC will do anything to stay in power.  It is exceptionally critical for the next term Trump White House Counsel understand this. The next WHC needs to be as brave as they are legally smart and strategic.

The next WHC needs to be brave for the office, empowering for President Trump, and stand as a flea against a furnace created by the IC and Lawfare system if that is what’s needed.

The next WHC needs to look carefully at the recent SCOTUS decision about the unilateral power of the President within the Executive Branch and lean heavily into that decision; fully extending the power and influence of the Office of the President against the full system of every Executive Branch agency.   Each silo needs to be confronted, and it is going to take a very bold WHC to support this effort.

The recent Supreme Court decision gives tremendous power, ABSOLUTE POWER within the Executive Branch, to the President.  This is not a time for the WHC to be timid, afraid or risk averse.  This is a time for the WHC to spread the wings of the Eagle and sharpen the talons for use against corrupt and weaponized agencies.  In short, go on the attack.

Strategic support for the goals and objectives of the President and National Security Advisor, should be the primary filter of consideration for the White House gatekeeper.

The counselor must be smart, killer smart; brutally strategic; cunning and fully versed in how the dark arts will come against them.  Prior experience as a target by the same system they now confront should be considered an asset.

The person filling the role of WHC must have exceptional constitutional knowledge and capabilities to guide and counsel the key people in/around the office of the President.  Not with the intent to stop the objective, but with the intent to support the objective by telling the scouts and strategic weapons “what” they will face and “where.”

There are some really good lawyers who can fill this role; however, every top-tier candidate must be filtered through the prism of stability, background, the lack of attack vectors against them and keen judgement in all facets of prior political experience.  They must also have a disposition of attack, not defense.  The WHC needs to push forward, not guard as much.

For this reason, I would love to see a brilliant and snarky lawyer like Eric Dublier take the job; but I doubt he would take it.  Another strong possibility would be John Eastman.

John Eastman has been the target of the weaponized IC and Lawfare.  He has a brilliant mind, strong constitutional understanding, and, well, perhaps most importantly, he has a personal reason to be pissed off about the current status of our Executive Branch agencies.   In the position of White House Counsel, John Eastman Esq would trigger spontaneous ‘splodey heads just from the announcement itself.

A collaboration between John Eastman and Jeffrey Clark would be good strategic positioning.  However, President Trump needs to be keenly aware that a team of “professionally republican advisors” will try to steer his options toward lawyers they know will retain the status quo.

♦ The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) – Remember, my goal is to describe the needs of some critical Executive Branch positions from a very practical, non-pretending, perspective of what happens within specific offices.  This outline is going to be a little odd, because almost no one knows what the position of Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) is about.

The ODNI was created as an outcome of the 9-11 Commission recommendations.  In the era shortly after 9/11, the DC national security apparatus was constructed to preserve continuity of government and simultaneously view all Americans as potential threats.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) were created specifically for this purpose.

Washington DC created the modern national security apparatus immediately and hurriedly after 9/11/01.  DHS came along in 2002, and within the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 the ODNI was formed. 

When Barack Obama and Eric Holder arrived a few years later, those newly formed institutions were viewed as opportunities to create a very specific national security apparatus that would focus almost exclusively against their political opposition.

Here is the weird part.  The ODNI was formed in 2004, with the intent for the office to be the pivot point of a national security radar.   The DNI was intended to provide information to domestic agencies about foreign terror networks that would prevent something like 9-11 from happening again.  However, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence has never, not for one day, operated on this intent.   This is why they are such a critical position from my perspective.

The office was new, not established yet as a functioning silo, when Barack Obama and Eric Holder arrived in 2009.  They quickly dispatched an idiot, James Clapper, into the operation so they could weaponize around the offices’ fulcrum point.

Prior to the DNI office existing, the CIA radar would sweep externally and then report to the Office of the President. The DNI was intended to take external radar sweep (CIA) and make it a full 360° circle, adding a sweep inside the USA that would be handled by the Dept of Homeland Security.

The DHS sweep and the CIA sweep would then be combined into a central collection hub called the ODNI.  Everyone with responsibility for “national security” could access the ODNI material. Essentially and presumably, post 9-11 nothing like jihadists practicing flying airplanes would be missed again; at least that was the intent.

The weird part is that because the DNI was immediately weaponized, the office has never functioned to the purpose of its intent.

No one truly knows what the office possibilities consist of because no one has ever seen anyone try to functionally control the hub.  If you think I’m joking about the intent of Obama and John Brennan using the DNI watch this video. This is before Brennan became CIA Director, this is when Brennan was helping Barack Obama put the pillars into place.

.

For the intents of this outline the takeaway is how the DNI office has never been used for good.  However, in a strategic way, that can be used to our advantage if you are talking about leveraging silos against each other.

Example:  The DNI can assemble material from any silo.  Meaning the DNI can reach into any IC silo and extract anything they want.  Under the original authorities given to the DNI, this authority exists.  So, let’s spread the wings on this office and do exactly what it is permitted to do, only this time extract for the purpose of showing the President what is happening in every silo.

In essence, the DNI *CAN BE* deployed like a super strong cross-silo inspector general’s office.  Force the other IC silos to comply with the demands of the DNI.  This has never been done. But the DNI has this unique power.

The DNI can make the FBI, DOJ, DOJ-NSD, DoD, DoS and CIA provide anything and everything they demand.  Instead of the other silos using blocks and threats against the office of the President, use the authority of the DNI to get them without confrontation.   Then use the DNI to declassify the documents (if requested by potus), instead of the originating silo.

Can you see how the DNI office can be repurposed to be a seriously strong weapon in the toolbox of the President, against the schemes of those inside the various IC silos.  The DNI becomes much more important than the CIA Director, NSA Director, FBI Director, Attorney General, etc, because the DNI can just show up and say, “give me this.”  That’s the whole functional purpose of the DNI office that has never been exerted; let’s flippin’ use it.

Let’s use the office of the DNI as the central information hub that takes information from inside the corrupt silos, then provides that information to the President who puts sunlight upon it.  Each corrupt silo penetrated with disinfectant.  This could begin a process to pull down the shadow operations and let the American public see what has been happening inside our IC apparatus.

To accomplish this approach the National Security Advisor to the President (NSA), would be the person who tells the DNI exactly what they are looking for.

How does the NSA know what to look for?  Because the National Security Advisor is the head of the National Security Council (NSC).

Now you see why I say put the strategic scruffy people like Mike Flynn, Kash Patel, etc etc in a stripped down NSC.

Let the NSC monitor the silos with specific intent, then provide Trump’s NatSec Advisor with details on what appears to be happening and where.   With the approval of the President, the NSA then turns to the DNI and says, “POTUS wants this, go get this.”

Raw, unfiltered, unredacted information.   The silo administrators end up in a fight with the ODNI, not the office of President Trump.  President Trump then uses the power of his office to support the demands of the DNI.

Under this approach the DNI has a lot more power; yet funnily, it’s power they already have – yet have never utilized.

Unfortunately, the DNI needs to be confirmed by the Senate Intelligence Committee – so, this factors into who could achieve the position.  [NOTE: Ric Grenell is too valuable in another position.]  John Ratcliffe might be a possibility, but I’m not sure he would be strong enough to go up against the system he knows well (and on a character issue he’s bff’s with Trey Gowdy).

Preferably we really want an outsider in this role, yet any true outsider is going to face massive scrutiny getting through the nomination filter.

My gut tells me that Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey might be a strong candidate, and as DNI he can build on his reputation for confronting DHS manipulation.

Missouri AG Andrew Bailey exposed the DHS manipulation of social media and has pushed the envelope against the Deep State/Lawfare attacks against Donald Trump.  Bailey has used the power of his office for good purposes, and that provides me with cautious optimism he could do the same at a federal level in the position of Director of National Intelligence.

♦ The next position to outline be a combination. The Secretary of State and the CIA Director.

The U.S State Dept and CIA operation is like a restaurant. The Dept of State is the front of the restaurant, with the Secretary as the Maitre D’. The CIA is the back of the restaurant, the kitchen. The Director is the Chef.  The consulates are the wait staff. USAID are the food runners. The Dept of Defense are the bus boys. Ukraine is a big tipper.]

Only a small number of Americans understand the relationship between the U.S. State Dept (DoS) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).  However, as more people understand how these two agencies operate, then people have a much more accurate context for how both agencies are viewed by the rest of the world.

Almost every deployed CIA operative has a cover profile within the State Dept.  The foreign service missions of the DoS and CIA are so enmeshed there is literally no way to separate the functions of their agencies. [Go back to the Benghazi Attack for an operational reference] CIA/DoS have to be viewed through the prism of connection.

To better understand this concept, I use the following metaphor:

♦ The U.S State Dept and CIA operation is like a restaurant. The Dept of State is the front of the restaurant, with the Secretary as the Maitre D’. The CIA is the back of the restaurant, the kitchen. The Director is the Chef.  The consulates are the wait staff. USAID are the food runners. The Dept of Defense are the bus boys.

The tables and chairs are assigned by the Maitre D’ according to their value.  Countries viewed as more important get the best tables.  The menus offered to each nation are completely different.  Israel has a table in the kitchen.  To get the best experience, tips (bribes) are required for everyone, from the parking valets outside, to the sommelier, to the server.   Currently, Ukraine is the biggest tipper.

On the oversight aspect the Senate Foreign Relations Committee is the control mechanism to approve/install the Secretary of State. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence is the control mechanism to approve/install the CIA Director.  Everything therein and thereafter is a system of pretending it is something else.

The Dept of State (DoS) is so large there’s no way of addressing the inherent institutional corruption.  The Secretary of State can control a small portion of DoS operations, but that’s usually only the geopolitical stuff we see discussed on television, in print media or in press conferences.  The business functions of the DoS take place within a network of carefully guarded silos.

Perhaps, the first step in advancing an American-First policy, is to just stop the various administrative offices within the Dept of State from doing anything, literally anything.  The challenge within DoS is massive, complex and complicated.  I’m genuinely not sure what the Executive Branch mechanism is to do it, but we need to close the restaurant for a few months and do a deep cleaning.

On the back of the operation is the kitchen, the CIA.

It is a popular DC sentiment to say the CIA Director is the most powerful person within the intelligence apparatus.  As the viewpoint is shared, it is the established secrecy within the mandate of the institution that gives them power.

Essentially, the CIA was created to be a place where dark arts (lying, spying, manipulation, tradecraft) would be approved and used at the discretion of the institutional leadership.  As a consequence, there is no check on the CIA operational agenda. They are permitted by function and mandate, to lie to everyone about what they are doing; this includes the Office of the President.

Because they are essentially an unchecked intelligence silo within a government that has allowed the institution to hold unilateral power and self-policing, the CIA has a power within the apparatus unlike any other member.

Inside the business model of foreign policy as a restaurant, the CIA are in control of the kitchen.

Together the DoS/CIA operate a shadow government, looking out for their best interest while generating power through large multinational institutions (corporations), spy agencies (5-eyes), banks, non-governmental agencies (NGAs) and various influence operations.

The activity of the CIA/DoS construct takes place regardless of who is president.  Any hope of busting up this corrupt system is going to take a lot of strategic pounding while confronting the supportive element within the Senate at the same time. [Note this is why repealing the 17th amendment would make the work infinitely easier – and also why the 17th amendment was created by banking interests.]

When you stand back and look at the challenge of confronting the DoS and CIA, you can easily see why the Emissary was the first most important person I noted.  If you are going to confront the domestic corruption within the DoS, you need the Emissary as a contact for specific foreign government leaders.

Under my approach, the interim foreign policy of the USA shifts away from Foggy Bottom and directly back to the White House.   This provides space to destroy the system through domestic confrontation.

A new State Dept Secretary is going to have to push intensely and forcefully to support the goals of President Trump while understanding the internal effort is going to be much less glamorous, but historically far more important.

♦ The Secretary of State needs to have an understanding of the scale of the system underneath them, a comprehensive understanding of the opposition they will face from within that system, and the fortitude to keep playing whac-a-mole until the heads of the sub-silos are slowly removed.  The person in this role needs to be a ‘high energy, smart, multitasker.’   The odds are all against them.

♦ The CIA Director needs the same type of understanding, and an impenetrable ability to put the USA interests above the interests of anyone else who has a table in the kitchen. Given the relationships within the aligned Western Intelligence Services, this is going to be a nerve-wracking challenge.  As much as I want the CIA candidate to know the scale of the problem they will face, in one important way it might be more beneficial if the person didn’t know the scale of opposition they will face.   This is a dark place.

This is a four-year plunge into one of the most corrupt enterprises at the heart of the DC swamp.  The DoS/CIA are the guards of the drain.  The drain is underneath decades of bile, silt, muck, scum, filth and horrible stuff.

Our candidates for these jobs need to be high-energy and full of equal parts determination, fortitude, piss and vinegar.

My recommendations are pictured below:

Continuing our discussion around the challenge to Trump staffing in 2025, we now shift focus to the FBI Director, Deputy Director and Chief Legal Counsel positions.

However, in order to appropriately discuss this critical silo, it becomes very important for everyone to understand the current status of the FBI as the organization has self-identified.

For those who followed the 2016 campaign of President Trump and then watched the 2017 attacks organized by the DOJ and FBI toward the incoming Trump administration, you may agree with me that a complete disassembly of the FBI is now warranted. I will walk through the process, but first it is important to understand just how bad the corruption has become:

RECAP: The FBI relationship with Antifa is exactly what we have previously discussed on these pages.  There is no way for Antifa to operate as a domestic extremist group, without the expressed support and willful blindness of the FBI.  Quite simply if the FBI wanted to stop the violent and extremist activity of Antifa, they could do that easily.

Remember, the objective of the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago was to resecure what they perceived as physical evidence President Trump controlled showing how the DOJ and FBI action in 2016 was targeting him using the power of their law enforcement and intelligence agencies.   In the background, the origination of all the DOJ/FBI/IC targeting goes back to the ’15/’16 FBI exploitation of the NSA database; this is not a contested discussion issue – it’s just continually forgotten.

The FBI was using their access to the NSA metadata of all Americans, to conduct surveillance on political candidates that might be a threat to the power structures that exploited the secrets within the electronic records of all Americans.  The FBI was, almost certainly still is, conducting domestic surveillance and tracking Americans just like the German Stasi or Soviet KGB.  It’s still happening, but we are not supposed to talk about it, or something.

The raid on Mar-a-Lago, just like the Robert Mueller investigation, was part of a long standing coverup operation.  The FBI was looking for what Trump took with him as evidence of the weaponized system that targeted him.  The FBI wanted that back.  The FBI was willing to use deadly force to get it back if that’s what it took.

Using the FBI to filter security clearances – [Fourth Branch of Govt]

A History of FBI Weaponization – [SEE HERE]

The modern FBI is the police agency of a weaponized U.S government, with a direct and purposeful mandate to keep the American people under control through strict surveillance and a violent police state.

Understand and accept this with great seriousness, there are no honorable “rank and file” inside this organization.

Every member of the FBI is a participant in the weaponization of power and government. The members are jackboots recruited from ideological college campuses for exactly the purpose of supporting a Stasi-like police state.

Through the past several years, we have discovered how the FBI worked inside Twitter, Facebook and social media to control information, remove content and manipulate opinion on behalf of the U.S. government – all activity political.

We have also learned the FBI took active measures to suppress information about the Hunter Biden laptop and control any negative consequences for the Biden regime – again, political.  These are not disputed realities.

The U.S. Dept of Justice and FBI are now political institutions that have abandoned their originating mission in order to become the domestic equivalent of the Soviet-era FSB. Their joint targeting mechanisms have been redesigned to support the interests of corrupt DC politicians, specifically the interests of Democrats.

It was in June 2022, when Senator Chuck Grassley sent a letter [pdf HERE] to Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Chris Wray, notifying them of whistleblower allegations from within the FBI that senior leadership in both Main Justice and FBI are involved in a coordinated effort to cover up criminal activity related to Hunter Biden.

The whistleblower allegations, in combination with the documented history of DOJ and FBI misconduct, culminate in Senator Grassley stating:

“If these allegations are true and accurate, the Justice Department and FBI are – and have been – institutionally corrupted to their very core to the point in which the United States Congress and the American people will have no confidence in the equal application of the law. Attorney General Garland and Director Wray, simply put, based on the allegations that I’ve received from numerous whistleblowers, you have systemic and existential problems within your agencies.” (LINK)

Grassley was admitting what has been visible for years.

Senator Grassley is telling the corrupt DOJ-FBI leadership that people in the organizations are outlining the detailed behavior of their corrupt leadership.  However, with zero oversight involved, and with Democrats in charge of all committees that would be responsible for such oversight, and with institutional media in alignment and agreement with the corrupt institutional intents of the DOJ/FBI, the frustrating question becomes, “and“?

I mean, who are we kidding?  If Republicans were in charge of the Senate Judiciary, Reform/Oversight, or Intelligence committees, do we really believe that anything would be different?   Before responding to that cynicism, remind yourself, they were for four years, January 2015 through January 2019, Republicans in charge of oversight.

It was exactly when Republicans were in charge of Main Justice and FBI oversight that Main Justice and FBI were targeting political candidate Donald Trump.

In July 2021, the DOJ OIG produced an absolutely damning Inspector General investigation of FBI conduct in the rape and sexual assault of U.S. Gymnasts, revealing how FBI agents facilitated Nassar’s sex crimes by taking no action despite numerous witness statements to them.

Worse yet, the FBI never reported the sexual assaults to local law enforcement… and to top it off, the rank and vile FBI agents lied during the investigation of their conduct, and the DOJ under AG Bill Barr, and now under AG Merrick Garland, refused to prosecute the FBI liars.

The entire IG report [Must Read pdf Here] reveals layer-upon-layer of FBI wrongdoing, misconduct and false statements in an effort to cover up their activity when the internal investigation of their conduct began.  This report is a total condemnation of the FBI rank and file.  It really is quite stunning.

BACKGROUND on FBI –  As we discovered in January of 2023, the FBI was fully aware of the terrorist who was planning to shoot the synagogue in Colleyville, Texas, and yet they did nothing.

The FBI knowledge of the shooter, Malik Faisal Akram, who was known as Faisal Akram, was confirmed by The Daily Mail. Akram ranted, prior to his travel to the U.S, that he wished he had died in the 9/11 terror attacks. He was a regular visitor to Pakistan, and reportedly a member of the Tablighi Jamaat group set up to ‘purify’ Islam. To say the U.S. intelligence system knew Faisal Akram would be an understatement.

The FBI was also fully aware of the Boston Marathon bombers, the Tsarnaev brothers, before they executed their plot.  The FBI took no action.  The Russian police twice warned the FBI that the Tsarnaev brothers were going to carry out a domestic terrorist attack on the USA, the FBI did nothing.

The FBI knew about the San Bernardino terrorists, specifically Tashfeen Malik, and were monitoring her phone calls and communications before her and Syed Farook executed their attack killing 14 people and leaving 22 others seriously injured.  The FBI took no action.

The FBI knew Colorado grocery store shooter Ahmad Alissa before he executed his attack.  The FBI took no action.

The FBI knew in advance of the Pulse Nightclub shooter (Omar Mateen) and were tipped off by the local sheriff. The FBI knew in advance of the San Bernardino Terrorists (Tashfeen Malik). The FBI knew in advance of the Boston Marathon Bombers (the Tsarnaev brothers) tipped off by Russians.  The FBI knew in advance of the Parkland High School shooter (Nikolas Cruz). The FBI knew in advance of the Fort Hood shooter (Nidal Hasan), and the FBI knew in advance of Colorado grocery store shooter Ahmad al-Aliwi Alissa.  The FBI took no action.

The case of the first recorded ISIS attack on U.S. soil was in Garland, Texas in 2015.

The FBI not only knew the shooters (Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi) in advance, BUT the FBI ALSO took the shooters to the venue and were standing only a few yards away when Simpson and Soofi opened fire.  Yes, you read that correctly – the FBI took the terrorists to the event and then watched it unfold.  “An FBI trainer suggested in an interview with “60 Minutes” that, had the attack been bigger, the agency’s numerous ties to the shooter would have led to a congressional investigation.”

Remember, shortly before the 2018 mid-term election, when Ceasar Syoc – a man living in his van – was caught sending “energetic material that can become combustible when subjected to heat or friction”, or what FBI Director Christopher Wray called “not hoax devices”?

Remember how sketchy everything about that was, including the child-like perpetrator telling a judge later that he was trying to walk back his guilty plea, because he was tricked into signing a confession for a crime he did not create.

Or more recently, the goofball plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer that involved 18 suspects, twelve of them actually working for the FBI as the plot was hatched?  And we cannot forget the January 6th. DC protest turned insurrection effort, which is clearly looking like an FBI inspired and coordinated effort; and unlike Syoc, despite the numerous CCTV cameras and resources in the area, they cannot find who placed the pipe-bombs?

Have we forgotten the Atlanta “Olympic Park Bombing”, and the FBI intentionally setting up transparently innocent, Richard Jewel?

What about the FBI failing to investigate the assassination of U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens in Benghazi.  Did we forget when Robert Mueller’s FBI waited 19 days after the Benghazi attack before showing up at the compound?….  Journalists from the USA were walking around the compound after 48 hours, but it took the FBI another two weeks before the first investigator arrived…. All evidence long destroyed.

Then, there’s the entirety of the FBI conduct in “Spygate”, the demonstrably evident FBI operation to conduct political surveillance against Donald Trump using their investigative authorities; and the downstream consequences of a massive institutional effort to cover up one of the biggest justice department scandals in the history of our nation.   The original effort against Donald Trump used massive resources from the DOJ and FBI.  Heck, the coverup operation using the Mueller/Weissmann special counsel used more than 50 investigative FBI agents alone.

And of course, the FBI still had 13 extra agents available to rush to a NASCAR racetrack to investigate a garage door pull-down rope that might have been perceived as a noose; but the serial rape of hundreds of teenage girls, eh, not-so-much effort – even when they are standing in front of the FBI begging for help.

[At this point, I am increasingly convinced by evidence there are elements within the FBI that are enablers involved in sex trafficking, human smuggling, abduction, counterfeiting and money laundering as part of their operational mission.]

The FBI didn’t make a mistake or drop the proverbial ball in the Olympic gymnast case, they intentionally and specifically maintained the sexual exploitation of teenage girls by doing absolutely nothing with the complaints they received.   This is not misconduct, this is purposeful.

Then, as if to apply salt to the open wound of severe FBI politicization, what did the FBI do with the Hunter Biden laptop?

[Notice I’ve set the issue of the disappearing Huma Abedin/Anthony Weiner laptop –in the known custody of the FBI– over there in the corner, next to missing investigation of the Awan brothers.]

More recently, the FBI executed a search warrant on the home and office of Project Veritas and the founder James O’Keefe.  While the raid was taking place, a New York Times reporter called O’Keefe to ask him about his thoughts on getting raided. The same New York Times journalist, a few days later, then begins writing about the confidential attorney-client privileged information illegally retrieved then leaked by the FBI during their raid.

♦My point is this…

What the Federal Security Service (FSB) is to the internal security of the Russian state, so too is the FBI in performing the same function for the U.S. federal government.

The FBI is a U.S. version of the Russian “State Police”; and the FBI is deployed -almost exclusively- to attack domestic enemies of those who control government, while they protect the interests of the U.S. Fourth Branch of Government.  That is the clear and accurate domestic prism to contextualize their perceived mission: “domestic violent extremists pose the greatest threat” to their objective.

Put another way, “We The People”, who fight against government abuse and usurpation, are the FBI’s actual and literal enemy.

Let me be very clear with another brutally obvious example.  Antifa could not exist as an organization, capable to organize and carry out violent attacks against their targets, without the full support of the FBI.   If the FBI wanted to arrest members of Antifa, who are actually conducting violence, they could do it easily – with little effort.

It is the absence of any action, by the FBI toward Antifa, that tells us the FBI is enabling that violent extremist behavior to continue.  Once you accept that transparent point of truth, then you realize the FBI definition of domestic violent extremism is something else entirely.

The FBI is not a law enforcement or investigative division of the U.S. Department of Justice.  The FBI is a political weapon of a larger institution that is now focused almost entirely toward supporting a radical communist agenda to destroy civil society in the United States.

The FBI set up the operation in Michigan to give the illusion that domestic threats were attempting to kidnap Governor Gretchen Whitmer, everything about the events were an FBI construct.   The same thing with the January 6th events in Washington DC and the pipe bombs.  These are domestic FBI operations.  Think about the precarious nature of what this type of activity indicates.

The current mission of the FBI appears to be preserving and protecting institutional power by protecting the administration of Joe Biden.

Anyone who continues to push this insufferable and fraudulent “honorable FBI rank and file talking point”, is, at this point in history, willfully and purposefully operating to deceive the American people on behalf of government interests who are intent on destroying us.

It is not a difference of opinion any longer.  Personally, I have lost the ability to sit comfortably or intellectually with anyone who pushes or accepts the ‘mistakes are made’ nonsense.  The FBI is not making mistakes, they are doing well what is important to them.

To me, it comes down to a simple matter of accepting what is continually staring us in the face.

Additionally, as we watched the outcome of the Michael Sussmann trial, we should never lose sight of the fact that 40 FBI agents were involved in the Mueller-Weissmann probe to investigate the fraudulent construct created by Hillary Clinton and crew.  40 agents? And, according to the outcome of the Sussmann trial, the FBI knew it was all a ruse.

This is why and how the Fourth Branch of U.S. Government is now the superseding apparatus above all other branches.  {GO DEEP} This is why and how Barack Obama, John Brennan and Eric Holder created it, cemented it, and made it impervious to any effort to remove it.

Remember when Henry Cuellar was critical of the Biden administration open border policies that were hurting his Texas district?  Less than a month after going public with his criticisms, the FBI raids on his home and office began.  The same FBI that raided the home of James O’Keefe while coordinating their search with the New York Times.

The Fourth Branch of Government is corrupt; heck, the J6 committee was defending the corrupt FBI, participating with the corrupt FBI, selling a joint J6 operation that involved the FBI.  The corrupt media have aligned with the corrupt FBI, and the justice institutions in/around this legal framework are self-aware and fully autonomous.

As the Twitter files show, the DOJ and FBI, through the authority of DHS, now have the ability to monitor every single aspect of every life that might seek to challenge or destroy the corrupt system.

In essence, Skynet -the ultimate end game of political surveillance and targeting outlined by Edward Snowden- has been activated.  We the People are the enemy of the state.

Jackboots are very real, and they are wearing FBI logos on their shirts.

♦ The Federal Bureau of Investigation – Arguably the FBI is the key agency within the U.S. government that has provided the most discussion since the agency first targeted presidential candidate Donald Trump in 2015/2016.

The FBI is without doubt the one agency I have spent the most time researching in the past decade; in part due to the researched corruption within it, and in part due to stunning revelations discovered about the way it operates.

With background context previously shared, my goal is to outline an aspect within the silo that few really understand.

This outline is extremely challenging without context.  Some of the questions people have about the agency will hopefully be answered, and my hope is everyone who reads will have new context.

Let’s start with a simple question: How is it the FBI can botch so many openly problematic investigative issues like terrorist attacks, and yet simultaneously spend so much time investigating issues that seemingly have little or no value?

In essence, how does the FBI miss so much, yet have time for things that seem openly political?

The answer to that question took a long time to understand, it’s much more than just institutional corruption.

The FBI as an institution has a modern operational mission that is different from what is commonly thought to exist.  The reality of the modern FBI mission consists of prioritizing their work based on the interests of Washington DC, and ONLY the interests of Washington DC.

If a subject can be defined as a priority for the system of government in Washington DC, then that subject is the targeting priority for the FBI.  It does not matter what priority is assigned by any outside interest on the issue; nor does it matter what level of importance exists from the actual threat itself.

Example.  The FBI misses terrorist threats, because the FBI -as a totally siloed agency- is not informed of the threat from DC.  If a citizen, group, or outside agency reports a potential risk it is not investigated.  This surfaces in everything from the Boston Marathon bombers to the Parkland shooter, to U.S. gymnasts being sexually assaulted.   If the “threat” defined is not a threat to DC interests, then the threat is not pursued by the FBI.

The FBI only investigates threats or subjects of interest that stem from origination in Washington DC.  Meaning if the DC system is threatened by the subject, that subject gets investigated.  If the DC system does not trigger the notification, the FBI does not investigate it.

In essence the FBI only investigates threats as they are defined by other agencies, or silos, within Washington DC.  The FBI is the internal agency that protects the DC system.  This is a bastardized concept, a completely screwed up institutional mission, that stems from within the term “the continuation of government.”

A local or state issue, is not a priority for the FBI, even if the issue is a major threat to the domestic tranquility…. UNLESS, that issue, person or group threatens the stakeholders within the DC political system.  This manifests openly by the inability of citizens to provide information that triggers action by the FBI.

The FBI only responds to investigative actions requested by agencies within Washington DC.  Typically, Main Justice or the DOJ is the source of those originating requests; however, sometimes the executive or legislative branch can trigger the FBI action, if the identified threat has the potential to upset political operations within Washington DC.

Armed with empirical, undeniable evidence of corrupt activity, I was prepared to engage the FBI when I was intercepted by a person who warned me about this operational mission.  It was from that point that I really began to understand the FBI as a silo within the system that is entirely predicated on self-preservation.

If a person brings a federal corruption issue to the FBI (like evidence of corrupt activity), they will end up being a target of the FBI because the evidence itself is likely adverse to one or more interests within DC.   There are many reference examples, but two you will likely know are James O’Keefe (Ashley Biden diary) and/or voter fraud (writ large, with Michigan as a great example).

Because the Biden Diary threatened the DC government interest, O’Keefe quickly became a target.  Because voter fraud in Michigan threatened the DC government interest, the FBI stepped in to cover it up.  You can say the same for the Awan brothers, the Huma Abedin laptop, the Clinton classified emails and many more.

The FBI has two ways to protect the interests of DC: (1) Defend by investigating the accuser, evidence holder, or person who raises the issue.  (2) Defend by non-investigation of the subject matter (Olympic Gymnasts, Epstein, etc).  Again, if the institutional interests within DC are threatened by the subject matter, the objective of the FBI is to defend those institutional interests.

The FBI is not a federal investigative agency with a mission to serve and protect the people of the United States.  The FBI is a federal investigative agency with a mission to protect the institutional interests of Washington DC.  Once you understand this process with clarity then everything the FBI does and does not investigate, makes sense.

This operational mission of the FBI explains why when a citizen brings an issue to the FBI, the citizen is more than likely going to end up as a target.  This reality is key to understanding the disparity between what people perceive as the FBI mission, and what the ACTUAL mission is.

This is not some off-the-cuff disparagement or conspiracy theory; this is the fact-based reality of how the FBI works.  Even in my own discussions with John Durham’s FBI investigators, they openly admitted how their operational mission does not permit them to entertain any evidence of corruption or wrongdoing within government.

When you understand how it works, then you start to realize the futility of expecting any investigative outcome from the FBI toward anything that does not threaten Washington DC.  Protecting the DC system IS the goal, the priority, the operational mission; nothing more.   Does the FBI inability to track the J6 pipe-bomber make more sense now?   There are a tremendous number of examples.

The various FBI offices distributed around the nation are essentially interception venues, constantly on the lookout to protect the interests of DC.  If an issue surfaces that could potentially put the administrative state, or any actor therein at risk, the FBI is far more likely to intercede, intercept and manage away the issue.

The FBI are essentially investigative managers; they are not concerned with fraud or criminal wrongdoing when/if that fraud or corruption might put a part of the DC system at risk.  Instead, the FBI will take control of the problem and throw their investigative blanket over it (Ex. Hunter Biden laptop, as given by the computer repair shop).  The non-pretending people within the FBI will admit this, as will just about anyone who has ever had experience reaching out to the FBI for investigative assistance.

Once you take this context and apply it to examples you can reference, then suddenly everything the FBI does and does not do, makes sense.  Every contradiction, and I do mean each example that might be pulled into the conversation as a reference point, makes sense from the reality of this perspective.  The raid on Mar-a-Lago and the targeting of President Trump is another brutally obvious example.

Many voices have recently started calling for the elimination of the FBI as a result of controversies that surround this factual mission priority.  Those voices are not wrong; in fact, there is no way to reform the FBI as an investigative agency, because the mission of the agency is the opposite of what it should be.

The FSB is known to protect the interests of the Russian government; this is accepted and no longer arguable.  However, the same purpose is true with the USA and the FBI relationship toward government.  Unfortunately, the system of government that benefits from this protection is never going to willingly remove their guards.

The last point on this issue is even more alarming.  Only a handful of people within Washington DC will admit the truth behind the FBI mission.

With this in mind, who should be the FBI Director, Deputy Director and Chief Legal Counsel for a President Trump administration.

If the goal is to begin the process to remove the institution, it is going to take a massive amount of public education to get this level of support in place.  Removing this one agency silo is going to take up a lot of time by senior members of the Trump administration.

FBI Director: Clay Higgins

Deputy FBI Director: Kris Kobach

FBI Chief Legal Counsel: Tony Buzbee

♦ The Department of Justice – Now we turn our attention toward Main Justice, the DOJ in DC.

Main Justice works closely with the FBI on what is loosely termed federal “law and order.”   There are several positions within the DOJ that are familiar as a result of the modern weaponization that took place.

As an institution, Main Justice is now almost exclusively a Lawfare targeting mechanism.

The Dept of Justice unilaterally focuses all criminal investigative resources against the political enemies of the Administrative State.

This is not to say Republicans are targets, because often the republicans are beneficiaries of the targeting operation.  Think about the example of Main Justice working with the IRS to target the Tea Party groups in 2010 and 2011.

The Republicans were much more opposed to the Tea Party than the Democrats were.  The professional republican apparatus was furious about the primary victories of the Tea Party, and subsequently benefitted from the DOJ targeting of the various patriot movements.

FBI HQ left, Main Justice HQ right

Main Justice targets individuals, organizations and systems that government officials and politicians determine are a threat to the power structure.  The Intelligence Community use their ability to conduct electronic surveillance to discover evidence against their targets.  The IC then feeds the evidence to Main Justice giving them the targeting coordinates.  The DOJ takes action based on the information from the IC, often using the FBI as the enforcement mechanism.

The entire structure of Main Justice as an institution is corrupt, top to bottom.  Much like the FBI, there is no agency, office, or subsidiary set of personnel within the DOJ that is not compromised by the modern mission of the organization.  This is a critical point to accept, because if it is not accepted then we repeat the mistakes of thinking an Attorney General alone can correct the problem. They cannot.

Within the DOJ there are several divisions that must be addressed simultaneously if any effort to take it down to brass tacks is going to succeed.  This cannot be a delicate surgical approach, the effort to remove the corrupt lesion will need chainsaws not scalpels.  The fine surgical details and cleaning will be for the next administration.

The interior silos each have an important role, and they include: (1) the DOJ-National Security Division (DOJ-NSD), (2) the DOJ Civil Rights Division, (3) the DOJ-Community Relations Service (DOJ-CRS), and (4) the DOJ Inspector General’s Office.    These are the four key agencies within the larger Main Justice system that must be addressed from DC.

Of those FOUR AGENCIES, the single most important one is the DOJ-National Security Division (DOJ-NSD).  This is the interior silo that was corrupted from its origin and remained intentionally without Inspector General oversight until 2017.

When we think of the common Lawfare targeting the enemies of the Deep State like Donald Trump, that’s the core purpose of the DOJ-NSD.

DOJ-NSD: […] ” The National Security Division (NSD) was created in March 2006 by the USA PATRIOT Reauthorization and Improvement Act (Pub. L. No. 109-177). The creation of the NSD consolidated the Justice Department’s primary national security operations: the former Office of Intelligence Policy and Review and the Counterterrorism and Counterintelligence and Export Control Sections of the Criminal Division. The new Office of Law and Policy and the Executive Office, as well as the Office of Justice for Victims of Overseas Terrorism (which previously operated out of the Criminal Division) complete the NSD. The NSD commenced operations in September 2006 upon the swearing in of the first Assistant Attorney General for National Security.” (link)

The DOJ-NSD hides behind the justification of “national security” to cloud their activity.  In many ways the DOJ-NSD and the CIA have the same cover story that allows them virtually omnipotent power.

The President has previously been hamstrung by the claimed importance and power of agencies under the guise of national security.  As you can see from the origin, the Legislative Branch created the beast then cowered away from oversight.  The worst outcome stemmed from the Judicial Branch who historically deferred to the national security apparatus.

To understand the dynamic with the Judicial Branch it is worth looking at the outcome of the DOJ-NSD targeting President Trump on the issue of classified records.  Check the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals framing.

As you can see the DOJ-NSD knows how to use “national security” as a sword and a shield.  This is essentially the issue now created by the DOJ-NSD targeting President Trump.

With the Legislative Branch compromised by their own creation, and with the Judicial Branch stuck inside an old paradigm of “national security” you can see how confronting the DOJ-NSD can only come from one place, THE OVAL OFFICE.

The President of the United States, hopefully Donald J Trump, is going to have to do what the other branches have failed to do, take apart the DOJ-NSD and remove all the functions of Main Justice to their pre-Patriot Act status.  This is not going to be easy and will take a very specific type of person as U.S. Attorney General who both understands the issue and can, more importantly, articulate the problem to the larger American public.

So, we have some context for the positions that will be important.  We need:

♦ An Attorney General (AG);

♦ A Deputy Attorney General (DAG);

♦ An Asst Deputy AG in charge of the NSD;

♦ An Asst Deputy AG in charge of the Civil Rights Division.

♦ And we need a key person in charge of the ultra-secretive DOJ Community Relations Service.

We need more, but these are the most critical positions to cover – AND REMEMBER, not a single person who has ever worked in Main Justice should ever be considered a candidate for any leadership position in 2025.   If they worked in the corrupt DOJ system, they are corrupt – I do not care what capacity they worked in it before.

♦ The AG needs to be ultra clean with a spine of steel and a laser focus.  The AG needs to totally understand the goals and objectives, without being told what the goals and objectives are.  The AG needs to be independent, stable, strategic, brutally honest and keenly confident in his/her communication style with the attack media.

President Trump cannot spend exhaustive time instructing the AG on critical priorities.  The AG needs to operate with skill, focus and self-motivated energy.   The AG will be the focus of the Lawfare crew for removal/recusal. (Weissmann, McCord, Eisen, etc.)

♦ The Deputy AG needs to be intensely capable to stay on task with minimal supervision.  The DAG is the git-r’-done person, no excuses, no apologies, no explanations.  Raw, brutal, cold, quiet and determined.  The DAG needs eyes of a mouse and ears of an elephant.  The DAG needs to be a sponge, with total loyalty to the mission.  The DAG also needs to be the bridge to the FBI.

♦ The Asst DAG in charge of the NSD will be walking into the heart of Obama/Holder’s created snake pit.  This DOJ-NSD position covers Foreign Agent Registration Act violations (targeting) as well as the weaponized FISA constructs.  The person put into this silo needs to completely understand the dynamic of the DOJ-NSD as the source of the most weaponized aspects.

♦ The Asst DAG in charge of the Civil Rights Division will be critical for all elements of election reform.  The ADAG-CRD is going to be attacked, called racist and blasted by the Lawfare operatives.   The Civil Rights Division DAG will be targeted by Marc Elias and hundreds of activist lawyers inside every aligned non-governmental agency who depends on the DOJ for enforcement and support.

♦ The person in charge of the Community Relations Service will need to head-off the FBI constructs and false flag attacks targeting the Trump administration.  The CRS leadership will need to protect all of the DOJ team from the Antifa/BLM efforts as they are manufactured by the FBI silo operators.

Potential candidates:

♦ Attorney General – Ken Paxton (TX)

♦ Deputy AG – Jeff Landry (LA)

♦ Deputy AG NSD – Sidney Powell

♦ Deputy AG Civil Rights Division – Byron Donalds

♦ Community Relations Service – Vivek Ramaswamy

 

~ SUPPORT CTH HERE ~

Posted in 2025 - Term 2, Uncategorized

Share

more

Subscribe

{}[+]

200 COMMENTS

Charles Stephens

October 25, 2024 11:14 am

One point of concern about Higgins. He’s been married 4 times and has a potentially messy personal life. Interestingly, wiki has edits on both him and Kobach over the last twenty days. Maybe to lay the groundwork for attacks? Lawfare minions will waste little time after the election and immediately start the personal destruction process to kill off as many qualified candidates as possible. Maybe, we should be attacking them. Maybe developing news info on who will be liable under RICO statutes for some of the chaos they have caused. Who will lead the investigation into Lawfare, little Benjy Wittes, Weissman, McCord, etc. Make them have to pay for their OWN lawyers for a change…

1

Reply

Ken

October 25, 2024 11:21 am

I like Dr. Ben Carson but I’m concerned that he answered Tucker Carlson wrong about what our worst health crisis is. As I recall, he said “obesity” but that’s only a side effect of the real crisis which is the poisoning of our food supply by ultra-processing with chemicals, sugars and seed oils. For a fleeting moment I thought he might be owned. But no, he couldn’t be.

0

Reply

Steve

October 25, 2024 11:22 am

Great insight Sundance. I agree 100% with these suggestions. NOW, if only Trump will pick them is the question. We all have to remember of the HORRIBLE picks he made after the 2016 election, and how many of them openly worked against him. I really hope he has learned from that and only choose the likes of these that Sundance suggests. LEAVE THE POLITICIANS OUT of the suggestion duty.

0

Reply

gulfaddict

October 25, 2024 11:22 am

Instead of worrying about the reach and corruption of the institutions CIA, FBI, DOJ, and their many tentacles and relying on Senate approval. Go after their life blood….Patriot act and the current tax system mafia.. the IRS. This is where the cabal has their power and control rooted.

1

Reply

Big Al Brown

October 25, 2024 11:43 am

Reply to  gulfaddict

Yes, first implement a Flat Tax one rate with large personal deduction so it kicks in at about $60K and fire entire IRS.

Then repeal Patriot Act and FISA Court.

0

Reply

Dow40k2024

October 25, 2024 11:53 am

I love reading your stuff Sundance and thank you, thank you, thanks again! Pass this along to all.

0

Reply

Ted

October 25, 2024 11:56 am

Hopefully PDJT and his family read this to at least give them food for thought.

So many important positions to fill and so many two-faced backstabbers to weed out.

Wondering how many of these people Sundance suggested can get past Senate approval?

0

Reply

« Previous 1 2 3

PRAYER REQUESTS

SUPPORT THE TREEHOUSE

EMAIL SIGN-UP

Click here for e-mail delivery!

“ASHLI” BY JACK CASHILL

CATEGORIES

Categories

Select Category

RECENT COMMENTS

Calbear84 on Trump Staffing 2025

magadonian03 on October 25th – 2024 Presidential Politics – Resistance Day 1376

Life & Liberty on October 25th – 2024 Presidential Politics – Resistance Day 1376

Bewildered but resilient on Friday October 25th – Open Thread

Johnny on October 25th – 2024 Presidential Politics – Resistance Day 1376

RECENT POSTS

October 25th – 2024 Presidential Politics – Resistance Day 1376 October 25, 2024

Friday October 25th – Open Thread October 25, 2024

Trump Staffing 2025 October 24, 2024

President Trump Speaks at Turning Point Action Rally in Las Vegas – 10:00pm EDT Livestream October 24, 2024

Texas AG Ken Paxton Sends Letter of Criminal Referral to DOJ Outlining Act Blue Illegal Campaign Finance Activity October 24, 2024

President Trump MAGA Rally – Tempe, Arizona – 4:00pm EST Livestream October 24, 2024

HISTORICAL CAMPFIRE CONVERSATIONS

Historical Campfire Conversations

Select Month

THE STILL HOUR

“Be still, and know that I am God: I will be exalted among the heathen, I will be exalted in the earth.” - Ps 46:10

© 2024 The Conservative Treehouse"

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/10/24/trump-staffing-2025/#:~:text=Say%20Hello%3A,The%20Conservative%20Treehouse

[doctorrachelwellner]

An Overview of Cancer Walk Fundraising Events in the US

Nearly two million Americans receive a cancer diagnosis each year. Cancer treatment and care require billions in funding. However, the American government cannot afford it. Therefore, citizens have taken it upon themselves to raise funds in various ways, such as participating in cancer walks.

In 2022, cancer led to 609,360 deaths in the United States, per the American Cancer Society. Common cancer diagnoses include breast cancer, with over 313,000 new cases annually, while lung and bronchus cancer causes the most deaths, according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI). The American Institute for Cancer Research advises the federal government to provide the National Institutes of Health with at least $49 billion in funding, including $7.76 billion for NCI, but it has not reached that amount.

Cancer walks, or run/walk fundraisers and walkathons, bring together community members to show their support for families living with cancer diagnoses and raise money for a cure. While different events have different rules and restrictions, individuals can participate as runners, walkers, or volunteers. Certain events may allow cyclists or pets.

A person participates in a cancer walk by signing up for the event and finding sponsors. Individuals often look to family and friends for sponsors but may also reach out to coworkers and local business leaders. Participants can also use social media platforms to raise greater awareness for a fundraiser. Each sponsor pledges a total sum or a per-mile donation, such as $20 per mile. The walkathon then plays out like a less competitive marathon, with participants pacing themselves to continue for many hours and raise as much money as possible.

There are a few notable charity walk events and organizations in the US. The American Cancer Society coordinates events throughout the country. Individuals can visit cancer.org and search for local run/walk events. The organization also provides resources for individuals to host fundraising events and information about related fundraising opportunities. The 2024 Choose Your Race–DetermiNation Mini Series allows athletes and philanthropists in Chicago to integrate fundraising initiatives with a myriad of events during the year, including trail races, local 5ks, triathlons, and more. The American Cancer Society’s Relay For Life is another well-known cancer walk.

After a person has found or organized a local charity walk/run event, they should prepare for the event in several ways. Participants should remember that they are raising money for a cause, not trying to win a race. A competitive mindset is unhelpful while preparing for an event. Instead, participants should remind potential sponsors of the positive difference they can make by pledging a donation or signing up to participate in the event. Team-building benefits and opportunities to socialize outside of work are additional positives to highlight when promoting a walk/run event.

That said, individuals must appreciate that they are taking on a physical challenge and may cover many miles over an extended period. Even if a person has no ambition to “win” a charity walk or set a personal best, they should discuss their physical condition with a medical professional before signing up for a walk. Breast Cancer Now recommends participants spend two to three months training for an event.

[coffeeheartworld]

Discover how your daily cup of joe can add years to your life, boost happiness, and even save you $1000 a year. Welcome to the surprising world of coffee life!

Title: The Astonishing Benefits of Your Daily Cup of Coffee Subheading: The Life-Extending Power of Coffee With every sip of your morning coffee, you’re not only awakening your senses but also potentially adding years to your life. According to a study published in the American Journal of Epidemiology, regular coffee drinkers have a lower risk of death from heart disease and other ailments. This is largely due to the antioxidants found in coffee, which help combat inflammation and protect your body’s cells from damage. Moreover, research from the National Institutes of Health discovered that those who drink four or more cups of coffee daily had a 20% lower risk of developing malignant melanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer. These findings suggest that your daily cup of joe could be a lifesaver. Subheading: Coffee as a Mood Booster Imagine starting your day with a surge of happiness. This is another surprising benefit of coffee. Harvard researchers found that women who drank four or more cups of coffee per day had a 20% lower risk of suffering from depression. The reason? Caffeine stimulates the central nervous system and boosts the production of neurotransmitters like serotonin, dopamine, and noradrenaline, which elevate your mood. Subheading: The Financial Perks of Home-Brewed Coffee While it’s tempting to grab a fancy latte from your local coffee shop, brewing your coffee at home can save you a significant amount of money. Let’s do the math: if a cup of coffee from a café costs around $3 and you buy one every day, that’s over $1000 a year. In contrast, brewing at home costs about 20 cents per cup, even if you splurge on high-quality beans. That’s a potential saving of over $1000 annually – money that could be invested, saved, or spent on experiences that bring you joy. Subheading: How to Reap the Benefits of Coffee Now that you’re aware of the surprising benefits of coffee, you may be wondering how to maximize these perks. Firstly, it’s important to remember that moderation is key. The Food and Drug Administration recommends a maximum of 400 milligrams of caffeine per day, equivalent to about four 8-ounce cups of coffee. Secondly, consider your coffee additions. While black coffee is virtually calorie-free, adding sugar, cream, or flavored syrups can turn your healthy beverage into a high-calorie treat. Opt for low-fat milk and natural sweeteners like honey or stevia to keep your coffee health-friendly. Subheading: Conclusion: Embrace the Coffee Life In the surprising world of coffee life, your daily cup of joe is more than just a morning ritual. It’s a life-extender, a mood booster, and a money saver. So, go ahead and savor each sip, knowing that you’re doing something good for your health, your happiness, and your wallet. Enjoy the richness of the coffee, the warmth of the cup in your hands, and the invigorating aroma that kick-starts your day. Welcome to the coffee life – it’s full of surprising benefits. Read the full article

[influencermagazineuk]

Ultra-Processed Foods and Longevity: What You Need to Know

In a world where convenience often guides our food choices, a new study sheds light on the potential health risks associated with ultra-processed foods (UPFs). Conducted by researchers from the National Cancer Institute in the US, this study provides compelling evidence suggesting that consuming high amounts of UPFs could significantly impact your lifespan. Understanding Ultra-Processed Foods Ultra-processed foods are defined as products that undergo multiple industrial processes and contain additives such as sugars, fats, and preservatives. Common examples include processed meats like sausages and hot dogs, sugary beverages, and packaged snacks. Key Findings from the Study The study, which spanned over two decades and involved more than 540,000 participants aged 50 to 71, revealed several critical findings: - Increased Mortality Risk: Individuals who consumed higher quantities of ultra-processed foods were approximately 10% more likely to die during the study's follow-up period compared to those with lower consumption levels. - Specific Health Impacts: High consumption of UPFs was notably linked to a higher risk of death from various causes, particularly heart disease and diabetes. However, no significant association was found for cancer-related mortality. - Study Design: This research is observational, meaning it demonstrates an association but does not definitively prove that UPFs cause early death. Factors like smoking and obesity were accounted for in the analysis to minimize potential biases. - Recommendations: Experts emphasize the importance of reducing intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and processed meats to mitigate health risks associated with UPFs. These dietary choices not only affect longevity but also impact overall health and well-being. Study Details and Presentation The study was conducted by Erikka Loftfield and her team at the National Cancer Institute in the US. The findings will be presented at NUTRITION 2024, the annual meeting of the American Society for Nutrition held from June 29 to July 2 in Chicago. This presentation will provide an opportunity for experts to discuss the implications of the study's results and its relevance to public health policies. What Does This Mean for You? The findings underscore the long-term health implications of dietary habits and highlight the importance of making informed food choices. While UPFs offer convenience, their frequent consumption may come at a cost to health and longevity. Moving Forward As research continues to unravel the complexities of diet and health, it's crucial to prioritize whole, minimally processed foods rich in nutrients. Opting for fresh fruits and vegetables, lean proteins, and whole grains can contribute to a balanced diet that supports optimal health. The study on ultra-processed foods serves as a wake-up call, urging us to rethink our dietary habits and prioritize wholesome nutrition. By making conscious choices and reducing reliance on UPFs, we can enhance our well-being and potentially extend our lifespan. Stay informed, stay healthy! Read the full article

[baiabazadze]

"Tracking Health Trends: Insights from the Epidemiology Frontline"

Epidemiology is the study of how diseases and health conditions spread among populations. It involves investigating the causes and effects of health outcomes to improve population health. By analyzing data on demographics, behaviors, environmental factors, and more, epidemiologists can identify risk factors, trends, and patterns that influence public health.

Current Trends in Public Health:

Infectious Disease Outbreaks: From COVID-19 to seasonal flu outbreaks, epidemiologists play a pivotal role in tracking and controlling the spread of infectious diseases. Through surveillance systems and modeling techniques, they assess the impact of outbreaks and recommend strategies for containment and prevention.

Chronic Disease Burden: Non-communicable diseases such as heart disease, diabetes, and cancer continue to pose significant challenges globally. Epidemiologists study risk factors like diet, physical activity, genetics, and socio-economic status to develop strategies for prevention and management.

Global Health Disparities: Disparities in health outcomes based on race, ethnicity, income, and geographic location remain a critical focus. Epidemiologists work to identify root causes and advocate for policies that promote health equity and reduce disparities. The Importance of Collaboration:

Public Health Agencies: Collaborations with local, national, and international health agencies strengthen surveillance systems and response efforts.

Academic Research: Partnerships with universities and research institutions drive innovation in epidemiological methods and interventions.

Community Engagement: Engaging communities in research and health initiatives promotes trust, enhances data collection, and improves health outcomes.

Conclusion:

As we navigate the complexities of global health challenges, epidemiologists continue to adapt and innovate. By leveraginghttps://health.universeconferences.com/ data-driven insights and collaborative efforts, we can address emerging health threats, promote health equity, and improve overall well-being. Stay tuned as we explore more topics in epidemiology, from emerging infectious diseases to innovative research methodologies. Together, we can make strides towards a healthier future.

Important Information: Conference Name: 15th American Healthcare, Hospital Management, Nursing, And Patient Safety Summit Patient Safety Conference Short Name: #15AHNPSUCG2025   Dates: May 14-16,2025 Venue|: San Francisco, United States & Virtual Email: health@ucgconferences.com Visit: https://health.universeconferences.com/ Call for Papers: https://health.universeconferences.com/call-for-paper/Register here: https://health.universeconferences.com/registration/Call/WhatsApp Us: +442033222718

[dukeshepard]

Hood to Coast Races

The Hood to Coast (HTC) race series involves teams of varying sizes taking turns carrying a baton over long distances. These events foster social connections transcending backgrounds and cultures while promoting fitness, community engagement, environmental stewardship, and other causes. Individuals can participate in any of the HTC race series.

The most popular is the Providence Hood & Portland to Coast Relay event, which is also the world's largest running/walking relay race. Attracting participants across the US and 40 nations, the race is considered the “mother of all relays.” This annual Oregon spectacle sees teams of 8-12 runners/walkers traverse a scenic 130-200-mile course from Mt. Hood's summit to the Pacific Coast.

Another common event is the Les Schwab Tires Seabrook Relay, which takes place annually in the coastal town of Seabrook, Washington. Featuring a looped course, teams of 4-6 people participate in either a 60.2 mile run or a 40.4 mile walk relay. The run begins and ends at 203 Front Street in Pacific Beach. The walk starts at 3 Sockeye Road in Humptulips and ends at Merriweather Street. Participating in this event targets fundraising for St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, the designated charity partner. Teams receive perks such as a St. Jude jacket or t-shirt, complimentary drinks and snacks, and a finish party.

In race events, the Providence Heart to Start is a timed run held at Cook Park in Tigard that offers in-person and virtual participation options. Participants can choose between a 5K or 10K distance on loops through the park. There is also a 200-yard kids free fun run. Registration fees and donations support the Providence Heart Institute's initiative to provide free automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and training to local schools and organizations in Southwest Washington and Oregon.

The HTC series also features The Red, White & Blues and Turkey Trot events. The former is a 5k/10K race that begins and ends in West Linn, Oregon. Like the Heart to Start race, the Red, White & Blues event includes a kids fun run. Adult participants receive a medal at the end of the race, while kids get bibs. The Turkey Trot 5K race is an annual tradition that invites individuals to participate with family and friends. The race takes place in Portland International Raceway at Winter Wonderland and includes kids fun runs. There is a participant medal and a t-shirt for all runners.

Internationally, HTC hosts relays in destinations such as Hainan, China, and Taiwan. These overseas relays allow runners and walkers to not only compete as a team, but embark on an adventure with friends and create memories in unique destinations. Participants must have proper international travel documents and arrange for accommodations in advance. Races vary in length and number of participants.

Several measures ensure participant safety during international events. At dawn and dusk, runners must use flashing lights, and high-visibility clothing is recommended. Runners must also avoid wearing headphones to hear instructions and traffic. However, music played out loud at a reasonable volume is allowed. With no guaranteed water stations, participants carry their own hydration. Moreover, the events require teams to handle medical emergencies on their own, though race radios enable requests for assistance.

Besides the Providence Cancer Institute and St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, HTC partners with various organizations for charity, diversity, and inclusivity reasons. Notable partners include The Sunshine Division (to distribute emergency food to families in need), World Vision (to fundraise for those who are in need or oppressed), the American Lung Association (to promote lung health), and the Bald Faced Truth Foundation (to enrich children's lives through experiences and opportunities).

[anuj1985]

How to Choose best Urologist Surgeon

A urologist surgeon specializes in diagnosing, treating, and managing diseases and disorders of the urinary tract and the male reproductive system through both medical and surgical interventions. This highly skilled medical professional addresses conditions such as kidney stones, urinary tract infections, bladder control problems, and cancers of the urinary system, including prostate, bladder, and kidney cancers. Their extensive training includes earning a medical degree, completing a rigorous residency in urology, and often pursuing additional fellowship training in subspecialties like urologic oncology or pediatric urology. Urologist surgeons utilize advanced diagnostic tools such as imaging tests and including minimally invasive procedures like laparoscopic and robotic surgery, to provide effective treatment with reduced recovery times. They are often affiliated with reputable hospitals and are recognized for their expertise through board certification, patient reviews, and professional accolades. Effective communication is essential in their practice, as they must explain complex medical information clearly, listen to patient concerns, and coordinate care with other healthcare providers. Ultimately, a urologist surgeon's blend of specialized knowledge, surgical skill, and patient-centered communication ensures high-quality care and positive health outcomes for their patients.

Selecting the right urologist surgeon involves several considerations:

Credentials and Experience:

When choosing a urologist surgeon, their credentials and experience are crucial indicators of their expertise and reliability. Top urologists typically hold a Doctor of Medicine (MD) or Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) degree from a recognized medical school and have completed a rigorous five to six-year urology residency program, providing extensive training in both general surgery and urology-specific procedures. Board certification by the American Board of Urology (ABU) or an equivalent body signifies that they have met rigorous standards and passed comprehensive exams. Experience is equally important, with more years in practice often correlating with greater expertise and proficiency in performing complex procedures. Additional fellowship training in subspecialties like urologic oncology, pediatric urology, or reconstructive urology further enhances their skill set. A high volume of surgeries, particularly in the specific area you need, typically indicates refined skills and better outcomes. Moreover, engagement in ongoing education, participation in medical conferences, and publication in peer-reviewed journals demonstrate a commitment to staying updated with the latest advancements in urology. These factors collectively ensure the urologist surgeon is well-qualified to provide high-quality care and achieve the best possible outcomes for their patients.

Reputation:

Reputation is a critical factor when selecting a urologist surgeon, as it reflects their skill, reliability, and patient satisfaction. A strong reputation is often built through consistent, high-quality outcomes and positive patient experiences. Peer recommendations and endorsements from other healthcare professionals can provide insight into a surgeon’s expertise and standing in the medical community. High ratings and reviews on healthcare platforms like Healthgrades, Vitals, and RateMDs are indicative of patient satisfaction and trust. Additionally, affiliations with reputable hospitals and medical institutions often signify a surgeon's credibility and access to cutting-edge technology and resources. Professional accolades, such as awards from medical associations or contributions to academic research, further bolster a surgeon's reputation. Ultimately, a well-regarded urologist surgeon is likely to deliver superior care, as their reputation is a testament to their dedication, skill, and success in the field.

Success Rates:

Success rates are a vital metric when evaluating a urologist surgeon, offering a tangible measure of their expertise and effectiveness. High success rates in performing specific procedures, such as prostatectomies, kidney stone removals, or cancer treatments, indicate a surgeon's proficiency and experience. Low complication rates and positive patient outcomes are key indicators of quality care and surgical skill. Surgeons who consistently achieve favorable results demonstrate a thorough understanding of their field and an ability to handle complex cases with precision. Furthermore, hospitals and clinics often track and publish these statistics, providing transparency and helping patients make informed decisions. It's also beneficial to ask about the surgeon’s experience with the specific procedure you need, as familiarity and specialization can significantly impact success rates. Ultimately, high success rates reflect a surgeon's commitment to excellence and patient well-being, ensuring you receive the best possible care. Success Rates of best Urologist Surgeon in Gurgaon It is said to be very good.

Communication:

Effective communication is a cornerstone of a successful relationship with a urologist surgeon. A skilled surgeon should be able to explain complex medical information in clear, understandable terms, ensuring that patients fully grasp their diagnosis, treatment options, and surgical procedures. This includes listening to patient concerns, answering questions thoroughly, and addressing any anxieties or uncertainties. Transparent communication fosters trust, making patients feel valued and involved in their care decisions. Additionally, a surgeon who provides detailed pre- and post-operative instructions can significantly enhance recovery outcomes. Good communicators also coordinate effectively with other healthcare professionals, ensuring comprehensive and cohesive care. Best Andrologist Surgeon in Gurgaon has very good communication. Ultimately, a urologist surgeon with strong communication skills not only improves the patient experience but also contributes to better health outcomes by ensuring that patients are well-informed, comfortable, and confident throughout their medical journey. If you are suffering from any serious kidney disease and the doctor has asked you for kidney transplant, then you should definitely consult the Best Kidney Transplant Surgeon in Gurgaon because in Gurgaon you get to see one of the best and experienced doctors.

[docsrelated]

Learn About Some Benefits of Coffee Beans

Roasted or brewed coffee beans is a well-known refreshment among people. It has settled its place at the top on this planet. If you want to buy coffee beans online, then it would be recommended to hit the internet and search for the most reliable and professional coffee beans suppliers. It will help you in choosing the best for your requirements.

Other than giving cancer prevention agents and a shock of morning vitality, coffee offers a large group of advantages, as indicated by research examines, including diminishing the danger of a few ailments, for example, diabetes and Parkinson’s disease. Coffee beans, in any case, are not proposed to fix, treat, or avoid any ailment; check with your health-care supplier about your coffee admission.

Diabetes

Coffee may lessen the danger of diabetes as per the information received from sources. Specialists examined the impacts of coffee admission on incendiary markers identified with diabetes in standard coffee consumers. Members dispensed with coffee utilization for one month and afterward continued coffee drinking the next month. The investigation found that coffee utilization decreased degrees of interleukin and isoprostane, both biomarkers of aggravation. Besides, the examination uncovered that subjects improved their HDL, or high cholesterol while diminishing LDL, or terrible cholesterol.

Parkinson’s Disease

In an investigation distributed in the May 2000 issue of the “Diary of the American Medical Association,” scientists analyzed the effect of coffee drinking on Parkinson’s infection. During a 30-year development, researchers found that higher coffee admission was related to a lower danger of building up Parkinson’s disease.

Liver Cancer

As per the February 2005 issue of the “Diary of the National Cancer Institute,” coffee admission effectively affects hepatocellular carcinoma or malignant liver growth. Researchers found that day by day coffee consumers had a diminished danger of malignant liver growth, and that hazard was decreased with the measure of coffee expended. For instance, members drinking five cups of coffee daily had a lower danger of liver disease than subjects ingesting three or four cups.

Prostate Cancer

Coffee consumers have a lower danger of malignant prostate growth than non-coffee consumers, as indicated by the sources. Researchers likewise expressed that caffeine isn’t the principle purpose behind hazard decrease. Even though they are as yet uncertain which segments are capable, they propose that cancer prevention agents and minerals found in coffee may have assumed a job.

Improves Exercise Performance

It’s deplorable that a large portion of us have been adapted to accept caffeine is a dehydrating agent. It is likewise one reason in your developmental years you were debilitated from tasting coffee or tea before a long class or address. Indeed, even wellness masters don’t suggest taking coffee previously or after a concentrated exercise.

In any case, a long way from that, ongoing investigations have appeared as much as caffeine can invigorate drying out, moderate utilization of coffee does not dry out exercise center lovers to that degree of interfering with their exercise. In actuality, coffee and it’s a legion of goodness helps with battling physical weariness in this manner permitting you a higher perseverance edge on the treadmill or under the hand weights.

Hit your order for Coffee beans online and enjoy the benefits of coffee beans. The suppliers will contact you and send all the requirements at your doorstep within a short period of time. Place an order today!

Visit for information : https://califarmlyfood.com/

[karismed4]

Texas Medical Services

Texas is home to many world-class hospitals, medical centers and health systems. But the state also has some of the highest healthcare costs in the country.

Medicaid is a joint federal-state program that provides low-cost health care coverage to people with limited incomes. It is a key safety net for vulnerable children, pregnant women and adults.

Preventive Care

A doctor’s job isn’t just to treat a sinus infection or stomach bug, but to keep you healthy in the first place. That means regular annual check-ups with your primary care provider (PCP) and preventive screenings that can find illnesses or medical problems early and help you improve your health.

Screenings and other preventive services are covered at no out-of-pocket cost to you if you see an in-network provider and your medical plan doesn’t apply a deductible or coinsurance to them. Some of these screenings include mammograms, Pap smears and blood pressure checks.

Vaccines and immunizations are also part of your preventive care, even if you’re not on Medicare. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends immunizations for children and adults at various stages of life.

The judge’s decision threatens the coverage of routinely recommended preventive services, and could lead to more Americans going without needed health care. That would be especially harmful for people in rural communities and racial and ethnic minorities, who are more likely to go without health insurance.

The federal government will likely appeal the ruling and ask for a stay on its implementation while it makes its way through the court system. That’s the only way to ensure access to the important preventive services that are guaranteed under the Affordable Care Act.

Supportive Palliative Care

Supportive palliative care (SPC) is patient and family-centered medical care that focuses on pain relief and other distressing symptoms related to serious illness. It also helps patients and their families manage emotions, understand goals of care, explore their values and interests, and make informed health decisions. SPC is offered alongside treatments meant to cure or treat the underlying condition and can be provided at any stage of an illness, regardless of whether that treatment is successful. It can even serve as a bridge to hospice services for patients with an expected terminal prognosis.

SPC may be provided by physicians who specialize in palliative medicine, nurse practitioners, nurses, social workers, dietitians, and chaplains, as well as home health aides and volunteers. It can take place in hospitals, outpatient palliative care clinics and residential facilities, or at a patient's home. Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance plans usually cover SPC. Veterans and some employers' policies may also cover this service.

UT Southwestern Medical Center has a team of palliative care experts, including Quan T. Dang, M.D., Hope Engelbrecht, Louis Joseph Lux, M.D., and Stacey C. Muhammad, M.D. These professionals work to provide symptom management and emotional support for patients of all ages who are suffering from a serious illness. This specialized team can help with chronic and progressive conditions such as cancer, heart disease, lung problems, and neurological diseases like Alzheimer's.

Treatment

The Texas Medical Center (TMC) is a collection of 54 medicine-related institutions including 21 hospitals, eight specialty and academic and research institutes, four medical schools, seven nursing schools and three public health organizations. The main center is located in Houston. It contains several notable libraries such as the McGovern Medical Library, which houses rare medical books dating back to the 1500s and historical manuscripts from the atomic bomb casualty commission that recorded the effects of the blasts on survivors.

While primary care providers help people recover from occasional health issues like a sinus infection or stomach bug, they should also work to prevent these issues from occurring in the first place. Without a primary care physician, uninsured people will look for healthcare in emergency rooms, which is expensive and often ineffective.

There are a number of addiction treatment programs in Texas, including state-funded options and private-funded facilities. Typically, these programs require clients to undergo a medical detox in Texas under supervision and follow up with residential inpatient or outpatient treatment. In some cases, a combination of both is offered to meet the individual needs of each client.

In addition to medical detox, some addiction treatment programs offer group and family therapy as well as different behavioral treatments. These therapies can help a person overcome their drug or alcohol addiction and achieve long-term sobriety.

Prevention

Your medical team treats you when you're sick with the occasional sinus infection or stomach bug, but their job should also include working to keep you healthy in the first place. Preventive care means more than a trip to your PCP – it's about knowing the steps you can take to protect yourself from developing a serious illness, such as obesity and high cholesterol.

In Texas, the state's health services agency promotes a wide range of public programs to help keep you healthy. For example, the Department of State Health Services' Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Program creates and promotes programs that encourage healthy lifestyle behaviors and educate people about preventing diseases. Its Immunization Branch provides information for families and their medical providers about the benefits of immunizations and which ones are recommended at different life stages.

The agency's County Indigent Health Care Program helps low-income Texans get the health care they need, such as prescriptions paid for by Medicaid or SCHIP. And its Aging and Disability Resource Centers can help Texans find assistance with personal care, nursing home care or help at home. And its Community Resource Coordination Groups help people whose needs can't be met by one agency and would benefit from interagency coordination.

But many Texans lack access to health care, including preventive care. They often seek medical treatment in emergency rooms, where the costs are much higher than at a doctor's office or clinic. They're more likely to die from a chronic illness, and they're less likely to have a family physician or other provider who can guide them toward good health habits.

[myblogscmi]

Global Dermatoscope Market Is Estimated To Witness High Growth Owing To Rising Focus on Early Skin Cancer Detection

The global dermatoscope market is estimated to be valued at US$ 951.1 Million In 2023 and is expected to exhibit a CAGR Of 12.85% over the forecast period of 2023-2030, as highlighted in a new report published by Coherent Market Insights. Market Overview: Dermatoscopy is a non-invasive diagnostic technique used to examine skin lesions. It provides magnified images that help dermatologists analyze the patterns and structures of skin lesions, aiding in early detection and diagnosis of skin cancer. Dermatoscopes are widely used in dermatology clinics, hospitals, and research institutes. The key advantage of dermatoscopes is their ability to identify even the most subtle changes in skin lesions, leading to early detection and better patient outcomes. The increasing incidence of skin cancer and other dermatological disorders is driving the demand for dermatoscopes worldwide. Market Key Trends: One key trend in the Dermatoscope Market is the rising focus on early skin cancer detection. With the increasing incidence of skin cancer globally, there is a growing emphasis on early detection and timely intervention. Dermatoscopy plays a crucial role in the early diagnosis of skin cancer, as it allows dermatologists to visualize the internal structures of skin lesions, distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors. This helps in improving patient survival rates by facilitating early treatment. For example, the American Academy of Dermatology recommends dermatoscopy for the evaluation of pigmented skin lesions, as it significantly improves diagnostic accuracy. These technological advancements enhance the efficiency and accuracy of dermatoscopy, leading to increased adoption by healthcare professionals. Key Takeaways: - The global dermatoscope market is expected to witness high growth, exhibiting a CAGR of 12.85% over the forecast period. This growth can be attributed to increasing awareness about skin cancer, the rising incidence of dermatological disorders, and technological advancements in dermatoscopy. - Regionally, North America is expected to be the fastest-growing and dominating region in the dermatoscope market. This can be attributed to the presence of advanced healthcare infrastructure, increasing adoption of advanced diagnostic techniques, and a high prevalence of skin cancer in the region. - Key players operating in the global dermatoscope market include Canfield Scientific, Inc., ILLUCO, HEINE Optotechnik GmbH & Co. KG, Tejco Vision, 3Gen, FotoFinder Systems, Caliber Imaging and Diagnosis, Firefly Global, Bio-Therapeutic, AMD Global Telemedicine, Rudolf Riester GmbH, and Barco. These players focus on strategic initiatives such as mergers and acquisitions, collaborations, and product launches to strengthen their market position. In conclusion, the global dermatoscope market is set to experience significant growth due to the rising focus on early skin cancer detection. The market is driven by increasing awareness about skin cancer, advancements in imaging technologies, and the need for timely diagnosis and intervention. North America is expected to dominate the market due to advanced healthcare infrastructure and a high prevalence of skin cancer. Key players in the market are undertaking strategic initiatives to gain a competitive edge.