#Advantages of OpenAI

[inextures]

How OpenAI Can Offer Advantages to Web Applications?

It is widely recognized that in our daily lives, modern technology and web applications have become essential and irreplaceable parts.

OpenAI’s objective is to make artificial intelligence (AI) technology more accessible to businesses. It is a non-profit AI research organization that makes powerful artificial intelligence algorithms and tools available to developers.

It offers a variety of APIs through which third-party developers can access its powerful machine learning and AI capabilities.

OpenAI, an exceedingly appeared enterprise recognized for its modern language models, mainly GPT-3.5, represents a sport-converting leap forward inside the discipline of synthetic intelligence (AI).

The promise of OpenAI is altering the way developers believe and construct web apps for the future, from natural language processing to content generation and seamless user interactions. So let’s explore how OpenAI can offer a plethora of advantages to web applications, moving them to new heights of efficiency, personalization, and user engagement.

Natural Language Processing

Natural Language Processing (NLP) represents a field within artificial intelligence that focuses on teaching computers how to comprehend and interpret human language in a way that is both natural and meaningful.

By maximizing NLP, online applications can efficiently process and analyze vast volumes of unstructured text data, encompassing user queries, reviews, and social media posts, achieving remarkable accuracy in the process.

Web applications that tackle NLP can yield various advantages, including enhanced search functionality that delivers users more pertinent and contextually appropriate results.

NLP empowers the creation of sophisticated chatbots and virtual assistants capable of engaging with customers in a manner that closely resembles human conversation, thereby elevating customer service experiences and fostering increased user engagement.

Moreover, web apps featuring real-time language translation can reach a global audience by providing multilingual support and eliminating language barriers.

As NLP technology continues to progress, web applications will experience improved personalization, content creation, and content moderation, ultimately leading to a transformative shift in how we interact with and perceive the digital realm.

Multilingual Chatbots and Virtual Assistants

OpenAI’s language models have changed web applications targeting a global audience by introducing multilingual chatbots and virtual assistants, fundamentally converting the way communication and interaction occur.

These intelligent conversational interfaces can interact in several languages smoothly and organically, resulting in a more personalized and inclusive user experience.

The advantages of multilingual chatbots go beyond simple conversation. They enable web applications to optimize customer support operations by providing faster response times and removing language barriers that may impede efficient problem-solving.

Furthermore, by adapting to individual linguistic preferences, these chatbots increase user engagement, making interactions feel more natural and intuitive. Businesses can gain significant insights into user behavior and preferences across different linguistic groups, allowing them to fine-tune marketing tactics and product offerings for each target market.

Increased Personalization

The process of adapting products, services, content, and user experiences to individual preferences, requirements, and behaviors is known as personalization.

It entails utilizing data and AI technology to provide personalized and relevant experiences to each user.

It contributes to a more engaging and user-centric experience by delivering content and recommendations that are relevant to the interests and preferences of each user. This promotes user satisfaction and motivates users to return and connect.

It experiences increase user engagement because users are more likely to interact with relevant content. Longer session lengths, more page views, and higher conversion rates can all result from this.

It experiences increase user engagement because users are more likely to interact with relevant content. Longer session lengths, more page views, and higher conversion rates can all result from this.

Real-Time Translation

Real-time translation is a mind-blowing application of OpenAI’s language models that has the ability to break down language barriers and promote seamless communication across various global audiences.

Web apps can now provide instant translation services by putting to use the amazing powers of AI, allowing for real-time interactions between people who speak different languages.

This technology is especially useful in situations when excellent communication is critical for success, such as international business meetings, internet conferences, e-commerce platforms, and social media engagements.

Real-time translation improves accessibility and diversity while also encouraging cross-cultural collaboration and understanding. Businesses may cater to a broader client base, increase their reach to international markets, and create a more immersive and engaging user experience by incorporating OpenAI’s language models into their online apps.

Open-AI Power Fraud Detection

Language models from OpenAI, such as GPT-3.5, can be effective tools for detecting fraud in web applications and online services.

Text data, such as transaction descriptions, user messages, and other relevant textual information, can be processed and analyzed using OpenAI language models. The models can discover suspicious patterns, keywords, or phrases connected with fraudulent operations by analyzing the content of these messages.

To build patterns of usual behavior, examine past data and user interactions. When a transaction or user interaction deviates considerably from these established trends, it may be identified as a potential anomaly or fraud, prompting an additional inquiry.

Language can be used by fraudsters to manipulate or fool users. OpenAI models can employ sentiment analysis to detect patterns of manipulation, urgency, or coercion in fake messages or emails.

AI-assisted content moderation:

AI can process vast amounts of content at high speed, allowing platforms to moderate user-generated content in real-time and respond promptly to potential issues.

As user-generated content grows, AI can scale to handle the increasing moderation demands without adding significant human resources.

Its algorithms apply predefined rules consistently, reducing potential bias and ensuring uniform content moderation across the platform.

It can help identify and remove harmful content quickly, reducing the risk of legal issues, reputational damage, and potential harm to users.

While AI can handle a significant portion of the content moderation workload, it can also flag specific content for human review when the context is ambiguous or requires human judgment.

Conclusion 

OpenAI’s vast array of tools and technologies not only optimize web applications but also drive innovation, efficiency, and personalization in a rapidly evolving digital landscape. Embracing the power of OpenAI fosters an exciting future where web applications can deliver unprecedented user experiences, paving the way for a more connected and intelligent online world.

Originally published by: How OpenAI Can Offer Advantages to Web Applications?

[copperchips]

Understanding ChatGPT, Advantages & Limitations of ChatGPT

There is no doubt that ChatGPT and OpenAI have revolutionized the world. The Internet has been inspired by its extraordinary natural language processing capabilities and its accurate responses. 

[centrally-unplanned]

Since I myself have often been a counter-critic to the AI art critics, lets flip that around. Was some of the "IP law hypocrisy" discouse floating around today, you know the stuff - oh everyone hates on Big Brother Nintendo or Disney or w/e for their machine gun copyright lawsuits, but now that generative AI is out its all about IP-senpai being a dashing prince coming in to save them. Either you like it or hate it, right? Pick a lane.

Which, for sure btw this describes some of them. Those who pretty much want AI dead for essentially spiritual reasons, yeah. But I think those are the weakmen, because the rub is that IP law is not gonna change any time soon. Those reform efforts seem pretty dead in the water, the artistic socialist utopia isn't happening. Which means you need to live in the world you have, which means you need to play the game that everyone else is playing.

OpenAI is gonna use copyright law to its advantage! As will Disney and co when fighting/balancing/dealmaking/collaborating with OpenAI and its slate of competitors. Every AI company is going to work as hard as possible to train models as cheaply as possible and sell them as expensively as possible, and part of that is going to be to push IP law in its favor around what counts as fair use, what is ownership, etc.

And while all law is really process, forever contested & changing, that is double+ true for IP law. If you think the New York Times has no chance in its lawsuit against Open AI for its use of its article archives, I think you are insulting their extremely-qualified legal team who knows way more than you. All of this stuff is up for grabs right now, no one really knows how it will shake out.

So if you are an actual career independent artist, there is in fact a lot at stake. What is the legal line for mimicking someone's "style"? Does explicit training on your previous art to generate equivalents count as transformative work? These are quasi-open legal questions, and again since the system is absolutely not going away in any form, its extremely logical to want that system to work for you. "Free art" isn't on the table; the real question is who is gonna be at the table to write the next iteration of owned art. Being at the table is an obvious desire to have. You can still wish there wasn't a table to begin with, that isn't hypocritical at all.

[mariacallous]

Reddit said ahead of its IPO next week that licensing user posts to Google and others for AI projects could bring in $203 million of revenue over the next few years. The community-driven platform was forced to disclose Friday that US regulators already have questions about that new line of business.

In a regulatory filing, Reddit said that it received a letter from the US Federal Trade Commision on Thursday asking about “our sale, licensing, or sharing of user-generated content with third parties to train AI models.” The FTC, the US government’s primary antitrust regulator, has the power to sanction companies found to engage in unfair or deceptive trade practices. The idea of licensing user-generated content for AI projects has drawn questions from lawmakers and rights groups about privacy risks, fairness, and copyright.

Reddit isn’t alone in trying to make a buck off licensing data, including that generated by users, for AI. Programming Q&A site Stack Overflow has signed a deal with Google, the Associated Press has signed one with OpenAI, and Tumblr owner Automattic has said it is working “with select AI companies” but will allow users to opt out of having their data passed along. None of the licensors immediately responded to requests for comment. Reddit also isn’t the only company receiving an FTC letter about data licensing, Axios reported on Friday, citing an unnamed former agency official.

It’s unclear whether the letter to Reddit is directly related to review into any other companies.

Reddit said in Friday’s disclosure that it does not believe that it engaged in any unfair or deceptive practices but warned that dealing with any government inquiry can be costly and time-consuming. “The letter indicated that the FTC staff was interested in meeting with us to learn more about our plans and that the FTC intended to request information and documents from us as its inquiry continues,” the filing says. Reddit said the FTC letter described the scrutiny as related to “a non-public inquiry.”

Reddit, whose 17 billion posts and comments are seen by AI experts as valuable for training chatbots in the art of conversation, announced a deal last month to license the content to Google. Reddit and Google did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The FTC declined to comment. (Advance Magazine Publishers, parent of WIRED's publisher Condé Nast, owns a stake in Reddit.)

AI chatbots like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini are seen as a competitive threat to Reddit, publishers, and other ad-supported, content-driven businesses. In the past year the prospect of licensing data to AI developers emerged as a potential upside of generative AI for some companies.

But the use of data harvested online to train AI models has raised a number of questions winding through boardrooms, courtrooms, and Congress. For Reddit and others whose data is generated by users, those questions include who truly owns the content and whether it’s fair to license it out without giving the creator a cut. Security researchers have found that AI models can leak personal data included in the material used to create them. And some critics have suggested the deals could make powerful companies even more dominant.

The Google deal was one of a “small number” of data licensing wins that Reddit has been pitching to investors as it seeks to drum up interest for shares being sold in its IPO. Reddit CEO Steve Huffman in the investor pitch described the company’s data as invaluable. “We expect our data advantage and intellectual property to continue to be a key element in the training of future” AI systems, he wrote.

In a blog post last month about the Reddit AI deal, Google vice president Rajan Patel said tapping the service’s data would provide valuable new information, without being specific about its uses. “Google will now have efficient and structured access to fresher information, as well as enhanced signals that will help us better understand Reddit content and display, train on, and otherwise use it in the most accurate and relevant ways,” Patel wrote.

The FTC had previously shown concern about how data gets passed around in the AI market. In January, the agency announced it was requesting information from Microsoft and its partner and ChatGPT developer OpenAI about their multibillion-dollar relationship. Amazon, Google, and AI chatbot maker Anthropic were also questioned about their own partnerships, the FTC said. The agency’s chair, Lina Khan, described its concern as being whether the partnerships between big companies and upstarts would lead to unfair competition.

Reddit has been licensing data to other companies for a number of years, mostly to help them understand what people are saying about them online. Researchers and software developers have used Reddit data to study online behavior and build add-ons for the platform. More recently, Reddit has contemplated selling data to help algorithmic traders looking for an edge on Wall Street.

Licensing for AI-related purposes is a newer line of business, one Reddit launched after it became clear that the conversations it hosts helped train up the AI models behind chatbots including ChatGPT and Gemini. Reddit last July introduced fees for large-scale access to user posts and comments, saying its content should not be plundered for free.

That move had the consequence of shutting down an ecosystem of free apps and add ons for reading or enhancing Reddit. Some users staged a rebellion, shutting down parts of Reddit for days. The potential for further user protests had been one of the main risks the company disclosed to potential investors ahead of its trading debut expected next Thursday—until the FTC letter arrived.

[eightyonekilograms]

The inimitable Maciej Cegłowski has this great article about the Wright Brothers, and why you never hear about them at any point beyond the initial Kitty Hawk flight. How come they didn't use that first-mover advantage to become titans of the aviation industry? Why aren't we all flying in Wright 787s today?

Well, the tl;dr is that after the first flight, they basically spent the rest of their lives obsessed with suing anyone else who wanted to "steal their invention", and were so tangled up in patent litigation that they never improved on their design, much less turned it into something that could be manufactured, and the industry immediately blew them by, with the Wright lawsuits being just a minor speed bump in this process. They were never again relevant in aviation.

I feel like this is worth considering as we watch Reddit self-immolate. In a broader sense this is happening because of macroeconomic trend, and non-zero interest rates, but it does feel like the immediate trigger for the idiocy at Reddit was them being pissed that OpenAI "stole" their content*, and wanting "fair compensation" for that, so now they're burning the site to the ground in this hopeless crusade which will not, actually, generate much revenue for the site or impede the AI industry at all.

There are a bunch of other examples of this dynamic, such as SCO and (more controversially, but I think it's true) Harlan Ellison. People are becoming stupid about IP again thanks to LLMs, and so I wanted to remind them that being consumed by an obsession with enforcing your IP rights often just makes you an irrelevant has-been.

* no they didn't, consuming public data for training a neural net is not stealing, no matter how many times people call it that

[tyote]

Damage control has started, huh?

On my recent post linking to an article describing how Tumblr has already scraped user data, and are relying solely on faith that OpenAI and Midjourney will retroactively adhere to users' opt-out requests (if they haven't been used in training already) one of the staff accounts responded with this:

Surely, this post has some clarifications, right? Here's a link so you can read along.

Tumblr: "AI companies are acquiring content across the internet for a variety of purposes in all sorts of ways. There are currently very few regulations giving individuals control over how their content is used by AI platforms."

Yes, and you're taking advantage of this for monetary gain. The article revealed you have already been scraping data, including data that should not have been scraped.

Tumblr: "Proposed regulations around the world, like the European Union’s AI Act, would give individuals more control over whether and how their content is utilized by this emerging technology. We support this right regardless of geographic location, so we’re releasing a toggle to opt out of sharing content from your public blogs with third parties, including AI platforms that use this content for model training. We’re also working with partners to ensure you have as much control as possible regarding what content is used."

Gee, that's great. Except now we know you've already been scraping! One of your employees has already moved his photography completely off-site! And you're relying on blind faith that those you are selling this data to will comply with user opt-out requests retroactively, and that's if the scraped data hasn't already been used to train before the user opts-out!

Tumblr: "We want to represent all of you on Tumblr and ensure that protections are in place for how your content is used. We are committed to making sure our partners respect those decisions."

Except we already know that you're essentially just hoping they comply. What they do with data you've already submitted and have been paid for seems like it would be out of your hands, especially if that data has already been used to train. Blind faith isn't "making sure" - the only way you could "make sure" is by making this system opt-in instead of opt-out... except you wouldn't be able to exploit us for the cash we know you need in that case.

[continuations]

We Need Actually Open AI Now More than Ever (Or: Why Leopold Aschenbrenner is Dangerously Wrong)

Based on recent meetings it would appear that the national security establishment may share Leopold Aschenbrenner's view that the US needs to get to ASI first to help protect the world from Chinese hegemony. I believe firmly in protecting individual freedom and democracy. Building a secretive Manhattan project style ASI is, however, not the way to accomplish this. Instead we now need an Actually Open™ AI more than ever. We need ASIs (plural) to be developed in the open. With said development governed in the open. And with the research, data, and systems accessible to all humankind. 

The safest number of ASIs is 0. The least safe number is 1. Our odds get better the more there are. I realize this runs counter to a lot of writing on the topic, but I believe it to be correct and will attempt to explain concisely why.

I admire the integrity of some of the people who advocate for stopping all development that could result in ASI and are morally compelled to do so as a matter of principle (similar to committed pacifists). This would, however, require magically getting past the pervasive incentive systems of capitalism and nationalism in one tall leap. Put differently, I have resigned myself to zero ASIs being out of reach for humanity.

Comparisons to our past ability to ban CFCs as per the Montreal Protocol provide a false hope. Those gasses had limited economic upside (there are substitutes) and obvious massive downside (exposing everyone to terrifyingly higher levels of UV radiation). The climate crisis already shows how hard the task becomes when the threat is seemingly just a bit more vague and in the future. With ASI, however, we are dealing with the exact inverse: unlimited perceived upside and "dubious" risk. I am putting "dubious" in quotes because I very much believe in existential AI risk but it has proven difficult to make this case to all but a small group of people.

To get a sense of just how big the economic upside perception for ASI is one need to look no further than the billions being poured into OpenAI, Anthropic and a few others. We are entering the bubble to end all bubbles because the prize at the end appears infinite. Scaling at inference time is utterly uneconomical at the moment based on energy cost alone. Don't get me wrong: it's amazing that it works but it is not anywhere close to being paid for by current applications. But it is getting funded and to the tune of many billions. It’s ASI or bust.

Now consider the national security argument. Aschenbrenner uses the analogy to the nuclear bomb race to support his view that the US must get there first with some margin to avoid a period of great instability and protect the world from a Chinese takeover. ASI will result in decisive military advantage, the argument goes. It’s a bit akin to Earth’s spaceships encountering far superior alien technology in the Three Body Problem, or for those more inclined towards history (as apparently Aschenbrenner is), the trouncing of Iraqi forces in Operation Desert Storm. 

But the nuclear weapons or other examples of military superiority analogy is deeply flawed for two reasons. First, weapons can only destroy, whereas ASI also has the potential to build. Second, ASI has failure modes that are completely unlike the failure modes of non-autonomous weapons systems. Let me illustrate how these differences matter using the example of ASI designed swarms of billions of tiny drones that Aschenbrenner likes to conjure up. What in the world makes us think we could actually control this technology? Relying on the same ASI that designed the swarm to stop it is a bad idea for obvious reasons (fox in charge of hen house). And so our best hope is to have other ASIs around that build defenses or hack into the first ASI to disable it. Importantly, it turns out that it doesn’t matter whether the other ASI are aligned with humans in some meaningful way as long as they foil the first one successfully.

Why go all the way to advocating a truly open effort? Why not just build a couple of Manhattan projects then? Say a US and a European one. Whether this would make a big difference depends a lot on one’s belief about the likelihood of an ASI being helpful in a given situation. Take the swarm example again. If you think that another ASI would be 90% likely to successfully stop the swarm, well then you might take comfort in small numbers. If on the other hand you think it is only 10% likely and you want a 90% probability of at least one helping successfully you need 22 (!) ASIs. Here’s a chart graphing the likelihood of all ASIs being bad / not helpful against the number of ASIs for these assumptions:

And so here we have the core argument for why one ASI is the most dangerous of all the scenarios. Which is of course exactly the scenario that Aschenbrenner wants to steer us towards by enclosing the world’s knowledge and turning the search for ASI into a Manhattan project. Aschenbrenner is not just wrong, he is dangerously wrong.

People have made two counter arguments to the let’s build many ASIs including open ones approach. 

First, there is the question of risk along the way. What if there are many open models and they allow bio hackers to create super weapons in their garage. That’s absolutely a valid risk and I have written about a key way of mitigating that before. But here again unless you believe the number of such models could be held to zero, more models also mean more ways of early detection, more ways of looking for a counteragent or cure, etc. And because we already know today what some of the biggest bio risk vectors are we can engage in ex-ante defensive development. Somewhat in analogy to what happened during COVID, would you rather want to rely on a single player or have multiple shots on goal ��� it is highly illustrative here to compare China’s disastrous approach to the US's Operation Warp Speed.

Second, there is the view that battling ASIs will simply mean a hellscape for humanity in a Mothra vs. Godzilla battle. Of course there is no way to rule that out but multiple ASIs ramping up around the same time would dramatically reduce the resources any one of them can command.  And the set of outcomes also includes ones where they simply frustrate each other’s attempts at domination in ways that are highly entertaining to them but turn out to be harmless for the rest of the world. 

Zero ASIs are unachievable. One ASI is extremely dangerous. We must let many ASIs bloom. And the best way to do so is to let everyone contribute, fork, etc. As a parting thought: ASIs that come out of open collaboration between humans and machines would at least be exposed to a positive model for the future in their origin, whereas an ASI covertly hatched for world domination, even in the name of good, might be more inclined to view that as its own manifest destiny.

I am planning to elaborate the arguments sketched here. So please fire away with suggestions and criticisms as well as links to others making compelling arguments for or against Aschenbrenner's one ASI to rule them all.

[solarpunkpresentspodcast]

Scrape

I want to talk about the recent news of Tumblr and Wordpress parent company Automattic being in talks to sell user content to AI companies OpenAI and Midjourney to train their models on. All that we know is currently in that sentence, by the way; the talks are still in progress and the company’s not super transparent about it, which makes sense to me.

What doesn’t make sense to me is the fact that a lot of Internet users seem to think this is outrageous, or new, or somehow strange behaviour for a large company, or that it is just starting. It seems obvious, given AI companies’ proclivities to go ahead and then ask forgiveness, not permission to do the thing, that Tumblr/Wordpress users’ public data has already been hoovered up into the gaping maw of the LLM training sets and this is a mea-culpa gesture; not so much a business proposal as a sheepish admission of guilt and monetary compensation. One wonders what would have happened had they not been called out.

When I was in publishing school back in the early twenty-teens, it was drilled into us that any blog content could be considered published and therefore disqualified from any submission to a publication unless they were specifically asking for previously published pieces. There was at that time a dawning awareness that whatever you had put on the internet (or continued to put out there) was not going to go away. Are you familiar with how Facebook saves everything that you type, even if you don’t post it? That was the big buzz, back then. Twitter was on the rise, and so was Tumblr, and in that context, it seemed a bit naïve to assume that anything written online would ever be private again (if it ever was in the first place…). It was de rigeur for me to go into my privacy settings on Facebook and adjust them in line with updates every few months.

So, for example, this little post of mine here wouldn’t really count as submittable material unless I substantially added to or changed it in some way before approaching a publisher with it. (The definition of “substantially�� is up to said publisher, of course.) This might have changed with time (and depending on location), but my brain latched on to it and I find it safest to proceed from this assumption. For the record, I don’t think it’s foolish or naive for internet users to have the opposite assumption, and trust that the companies whose platforms they are using will handle their content in a respectful way and guard their privacy. That should be the baseline. It is a right and correct impulse, taken egregious advantage of by the morally bankrupt.

In any case, I at first have interpreted this whole debacle as …slightly empowering to users, in a way, as now there are opt-out procedures that Tumblr users can take to put the kibosh on a process that is already happening, and now this scraping of data will be monitored by the parent site, instead of operating according to a don’t-ask-don’t-tell policy. I have to wonder if the same will be extended to Reddit users, or the commenters on CNN or Fox news. And whether my first impression will bear up under any weight of scrutiny whatsoever.

On social media, I assume that everything I post will always and forever be accessible to anyone with enough skills (or money) to want to access it. Same with email, anything in “the cloud” that is not hosted on a double-encrypted server, my search engine preferences, and really any site that I have a login for. My saving grace thus far has been that I am a boring person with neither fame nor wealth nor enemies with a reason to go after me. Facebook got big when I was in my undergraduate years; given that social media was extremely nascent back then, I put a lot of stuff up that I shouldn’t have. Data that I care about. Things I would like to keep secret, keep safe. But I’ve long made my peace with the fact that the internet has known everything about everything I was willing to put up about me for my entire adult life and continues to grasp for more and more. At least on Tumblr, I can say “no”, and then get righteously indignant when that “no” is inevitably ignored and my rights violated.

I hate this state of affairs. But I also want to be able to talk to my family, connect with other solarpunks, do research, communicate with my colleagues … to live in a society, one might say. I try not to let it bother me much. However, I DO sign anything and everything that comes my way from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an organization dedicated to legislating the shit out of these corporations that have given us free tickets to unlimited knowledge and communication for the price of our personal data, and effectively excommunicated anyone who does not agree to their TOS. The EFF is US-based, but given that most of the social media and AI giants on the internet are also US-based, I feel like it’s relevant.

In my solarpunk future, the internet does still exist, and we can access and use it as much or as little as we like. But it is tightly controlled so that the reckless appropriation and use of art, writing, content, personal data, cannot happen and is not the fee charged for participation in the world wide web. I want to live in a world where my personal data is my own but I can still reach out to my friends and family whenever I’d like, about whatever I want; isn’t that a nice thought?

[aionlinemoney]

How Apple Integration with ChatGPT AI is Transforming AI-Powered User Experiences

In today’s fastest changing world of new technology in 2024, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming more important for human beings to stay updated in everyday digital tools. AI is making the work easy to understand and playing a bigger role in our daily life. The big change is coming and also one of the exciting developments in the technology is integration of ChatGPT AI with Apple devices. This will make the apple devices into the next level combination. The upcoming merge of OpenAI and Apple Devices has potential to transform the technology in everyday life, this will make our interaction smoother and more efficient in the devices. AI has potential to transform our digital experiences by offering smarter and emotional ways to interact with the technologies.

AI meets daily new technology in 2024: New Era of integration

Artificial intelligence has transformed from theoretical concepts into practical tools used by many people in daily life. AI has become part of every feature in our life like smart home devices, virtual assistants, and mobile devices. Open AI is one of the most famous and interesting AI tools developed by OpenAI. ChatGPT AI can understand and generate human-like text based on what we give commands to it. Chatgpt AI is changing how we interact with new technology in 2024, whether it’s answering questions, having detailed conversations, drafting emails whatever we give commands it generates professionally. By using AI the life of humans has become easier From year to year, Apple devices are famous for its innovative and user-friendly experience with their devices. They have made their user experience better from year to year. The craze of upcoming Apple devices using their devices from Iphone to Mac devices and also from launching Siri to high-quality cameras, people are crazy for the new experience of collaboration between Apple and OpenAI. With Chatgpt AI users can expect more responsive and intelligent interaction with their devices. Imagine a more natural conversation with Siri, receiving more smart suggestions to your needs and problem-solving tasks, this integration will definitely change the experience of users making the technology more reachable than ever before.

Benefits of integrating ChatGPT with Apple devices :

Integration of OpenAI with Apple devices can open up new possibilities in personal and professional use. This integration helps to transform our interaction with technology making our devices helpful and smarter in our daily lives. Here are some key points where this integration could make a big difference :

Enhanced Virtual assistant : Siri is known as Iphone’s voice-activated personal assistant. If ChatGPT AI is integrated with Siri, it can make Siri more Powerful in devices. Siri is best for handling basic commands but ChatGPT AI can better understand and respond to more complex commands very efficiently. This will help to take users’ experience to the next level, so users can ask complicated questions and get detailed explanations more naturally. Also using Chatgpt enhances the experience of the user.

Perfect Cross Devices experience :  Apple devices are known for its perfect integration and user experience across its devices. The addition of Chatgpt AI would further increase this connected experience. Imagine starting a communication with Siri with your iPhone ongoing Macbook and getting updates on Apple Watch. This is a perfect cross device experience getting in Devices. We can handle our work and data easily by this experience.

Enhanced content creation : The integration of ChatGPT with Apple devices could greatly benefit content creation. Writers, marketers, and creators could use OpenAI to come up with ideas or edit text directly on their Apple devices. Being able to produce high-quality and relevant content easily would be an advantage for those who depend on content for their work.

Education and learning : Integrating ChatGPT into Apple devices could greatly improve educational tools and learning experiences. ChatGPT AI could act as a personal tutor, helping students grasp difficult subjects, explaining topics in different ways, or providing interactive study guides. ChatGPT AI could offer practice conversations, correct grammar, and give instant feedback for people learning new languages.

Conclusion : Integrating ChatGPT with Apple iPhone 16 is a big step forward for AI new technology in 2024. By bringing together Apple’s focus on innovation and user experience with OpenAI advanced language skills, users could have a more digital experience. However, it’s important to consider privacy, accuracy, and user trust to fully benefit from this powerful combination. As Apple devices in 2024 keep pushing forward with new ideas, the future of AI interactions looks promising, with the potential to change how we use our devices and connect with the world.

[earththings]

I'm an artist and graphic designer, so I completely get people's outrage and frustration (especially on Tumblr, where outrage is already amplified and cranked up to 11), but at the same time, they're letting the outrage blind them to reality. AI is here. It's not going away. People can do their absolute best to foil it and discourage its use -- and that's completely fair -- but, to a certain degree, all you're doing is effectively training the AI to be better at working around those measures. Developers are not going to be like, "*sigh*, well, guys, they're just throwing too many roadblocks as us, let's pack it in." It's here. At a certain point people need to suck it up or get off Tumblr and look into supporting legislation that better controls it. But ultimately, I think there's a level of futility to all of it. If you can't stop it, learn how to use it to your advantage. My company has signed up for OpenAI so that we can do just that. I use it to generate stock images that don't exist, and that I don't have time to manually create on my own. I use it to create reference photos or images (that don't already exist) for myself that are hard for me to mentally conceptualize, so that I can create my own art. People LOVE to be angry. It's been more than 10 years since it's become an online hobby for most people. The whole point of your Tumblr, and the reason that I enjoy it so much, is because it is a complete departure from that constant, seething outrage that does no one any good, and has no positive returns. I've already voted in the poll, but -- do what you love. Block the haters. It's the best you can do to maintain this nice, sweet, cozy corner you've created for yourself and those who enjoy it.

This was really well put. At the end of the day no matter if I continue to post ai content it will still exist. I’m not the mastermind behind ai, I can barely remember how to mod my sims game properly.

Also like you said artist themselves use ai to help with their art. Not every ai picture is taken from stole art. Sometimes it’s for like you said, stock photos, or just to properly visualize what you’d like to do.

While I also understand people’s frustration I never meant to offend anybody. You are right though. The whole point of me making this tumblr was because I was in a very bad stop mentally. I did want to eat, I had nightmares when I slept. I didn’t see any beauty in the world and I didn’t want to be apart of it anymore. This was very hard to deal with and I was withering away.

I thought to myself “maybe just make a blog, about the world and its beauty, about food and how it can be good, about sleep and how it can be healing. Maybe if I only look at beautiful things, things will start to feel beautiful again”

I didn’t create this blog to fight with tumblr about ai. I created it for me and people like me who need an escape from the harshness and cruelty of reality. The idea was always to post about earth and her beauty, no matter if it was human made or earth made, to remind me how much more there is to life and that not all humans harm and destroy, some give and create.

I really appreciate you giving your opinion on this matter. And I really appreciate you being here. I hope my blog continues to bring you joy and peace throughout any stressful or calm times in your life. 🫶🏻

[zamanahmed]

FlyMSG AI Writer AI Post Generator & LinkedIn Commenting

Flymsg Ai Writer Ai Post Generator & LinkedIn Commenting Mastery

Are you tired of spending hours trying to write the perfect comment on LinkedIn? Do you wish you had a tool that could help you create engaging social media posts quickly? Look no further! Flymsg: AI Writer AI Post Generator & LinkedIn Commenting is here to make your life easier. In this article, we will explore how Flymsg can help you save time and improve your social media marketing and LinkedIn engagement using advanced AI technology.

Overview of Flymsg

Flymsg is a powerful business productivity app designed to help users create and manage text efficiently. It offers a variety of features that make it a valuable tool for anyone who works on a computer every day. Let's dive into the key features of Flymsg:

Create FlyCuts: Flymsg allows you to create FlyCuts, which are shortcodes, shortcuts, or snippets that expand, autofill, augment, and replace text as you type.

Personal Writing Assistant: Flymsg acts as your personal writing assistant and text expander tool, helping you write faster and more efficiently.

AI-Powered LinkedIn Engagement: Flymsg uses Google AI (Palm 2) and OpenAI Chat GPT to help you engage with your LinkedIn network in real-time.

Multilingual Support: Flymsg supports 39 major languages, allowing you to write comments in the same language as the LinkedIn post.

Time-saving Benefits

One of the biggest advantages of using Flymsg is the amount of time it saves you. Instead of spending hours crafting the perfect LinkedIn comment or social media post, you can do it in just a few seconds. Flymsg's AI technology helps you generate high-quality content quickly, so you can focus on other important tasks.

Flymsg for LinkedIn Commenting

LinkedIn is a powerful platform for networking and building professional relationships. However, engaging with your network can be time-consuming. This is where Flymsg comes in handy. Let's take a closer look at how Flymsg can enhance your LinkedIn commenting experience:

Flyengage Ai

FlyEngage AI is designed to help you connect with your buyers and engage with your LinkedIn network more effectively. Here are some key features of FlyEngage AI:

Real-Time Engagement: FlyEngage AI allows you to engage with LinkedIn posts in real-time using AI technology.

Human-Assisted AI: FlyEngage AI combines human intelligence with AI to create personalized and meaningful comments.

Save Favorite Prompts: You can save your favorite prompts as FlyCuts and expand them instantly using the text expander.

Imagine having your own AI assistant every time you click "comment" on a LinkedIn post. Flymsg makes this possible, allowing you to engage with your network more efficiently and effectively.

Flymsg for Social Media Post Generation

Creating engaging social media posts can be challenging, especially if you're short on time. Flymsg offers a solution with its AI-powered post generation features. Let's explore how Flymsg can help you create high-quality social media posts:

Flyposts Ai

FlyPosts AI is an AI post generator designed to help you create LinkedIn posts quickly and easily. Here are some key features of FlyPosts AI:

Pre-Defined Prompts: FlyPosts AI offers pre-defined prompts on various topics to help you get started.

Custom AI Prompts: You can create custom AI prompts to generate posts tailored to your needs.

Save Time: FlyPosts AI helps you save time by generating high-quality posts quickly.

FlyPosts AI is ideal for sellers, business owners, executives, social media marketers, and anyone who wants to develop their personal or company brand on social media.

Who Can Benefit from Flymsg?

Flymsg is a versatile tool that can benefit a wide range of professionals. Here are some of the key groups of people who can benefit from using Flymsg:

Sellers: Flymsg helps sellers engage with their prospects and customers more effectively on LinkedIn.

Human Resources: HR professionals can use Flymsg to streamline their communication and save time.

Customer Service: Customer service agents can use Flymsg to respond to customer inquiries quickly and efficiently.

Business Owners: Business owners can use Flymsg to improve their social media marketing and engage with their audience.

Recruiters: Recruiters can use Flymsg to engage with potential candidates and build relationships.

Finance Professionals: Finance professionals can use Flymsg to manage their communication more effectively.

In short, Flymsg can help just about anyone who works on a computer and needs to create and manage text efficiently.

How to Get Started with Flymsg

Getting started with Flymsg is easy. You can find Flymsg on Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge. Simply add the Flymsg extension to your browser, and you'll be ready to start using its powerful features.

Flymsg offers a user-friendly interface that makes it easy to create FlyCuts, generate LinkedIn comments, and create social media posts. Whether you're a seasoned professional or just getting started with social media marketing, Flymsg is a valuable tool that can help you save time and improve your productivity.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Is Flymsg?

Flymsg is an AI-powered writing assistant and text expander.

How Does Flymsg Help On Linkedin?

Flymsg helps create and scale LinkedIn comments and posts using AI.

Can Flymsg Write In Multiple Languages?

Yes, Flymsg supports LinkedIn comments in 39 major languages.

Is Flymsg Available As A Browser Extension?

Flymsg can be found on Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Flymsg: AI Writer AI Post Generator & LinkedIn Commenting is a powerful tool that can help you save time and improve your social media marketing and LinkedIn engagement. With its advanced AI technology, Flymsg makes it easy to create high-quality content quickly and efficiently. Whether you're a seller, business owner, HR professional, customer service agent, or anyone who works on a computer, Flymsg is a valuable tool that can help you achieve your goals.

Don't miss out on the benefits of Flymsg. Get access today and start saving time and improving your productivity!

[rushibloger]

ChatGPT

ChatGPT is an AI developed by OpenAI that's designed to engage in conversational interactions with users like yourself. It's part of the larger family of GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) models, which are capable of understanding and generating human-like text based on the input it receives. ChatGPT has been trained on vast amounts of text data from the internet and other sources, allowing it to generate responses that are contextually relevant and, hopefully, helpful or interesting to you.

Where can be used this ChatGPT:

ChatGPT can be used in various contexts where human-like text generation and interaction are beneficial. Here are some common use cases:

Customer Support: ChatGPT can provide automated responses to customer inquiries on websites or in messaging platforms, assisting with basic troubleshooting or frequently asked questions.

Personal Assistants: ChatGPT can act as a virtual assistant, helping users with tasks such as setting reminders, managing schedules, or providing information on a wide range of topics.

Education: ChatGPT can serve as a tutor or learning companion, answering students' questions, providing explanations, and offering study assistance across different subjects.

Content Creation: ChatGPT can assist writers, bloggers, and content creators by generating ideas, offering suggestions, or even drafting content based on given prompts.

Entertainment: ChatGPT can engage users in casual conversation, tell jokes, share interesting facts, or even participate in storytelling or role-playing games.

Therapy and Counseling: ChatGPT can provide a listening ear and offer supportive responses to individuals seeking emotional support or guidance.

Language Learning: ChatGPT can help language learners practice conversation, receive feedback on their writing, or clarify grammar and vocabulary concepts.

ChatGPT offers several advantages across various applications:

Scalability: ChatGPT can handle a large volume of conversations simultaneously, making it suitable for applications with high user engagement.

24/7 Availability: Since ChatGPT is automated, it can be available to users around the clock, providing assistance or information whenever needed.

Consistency: ChatGPT provides consistent responses regardless of the time of day or the number of inquiries, ensuring that users receive reliable information.

Cost-Effectiveness: Implementing ChatGPT can reduce the need for human agents in customer support or other interaction-based roles, resulting in cost savings for businesses.

Efficiency: ChatGPT can quickly respond to user queries, reducing waiting times and improving user satisfaction.

Customization: ChatGPT can be fine-tuned and customized to suit specific applications or industries, ensuring that the responses align with the organization's brand voice and objectives.

Language Support: ChatGPT can communicate in multiple languages, allowing businesses to cater to a diverse audience without the need for multilingual support teams.

Data Insights: ChatGPT can analyze user interactions to identify trends, gather feedback, and extract valuable insights that can inform business decisions or improve the user experience.

Personalization: ChatGPT can be trained on user data to provide personalized recommendations or responses tailored to individual preferences or circumstances.

Continuous Improvement: ChatGPT can be updated and fine-tuned over time based on user feedback and new data, ensuring that it remains relevant and effective in addressing users' needs.

These advantages make ChatGPT a powerful tool for businesses, educators, developers, and individuals looking to enhance their interactions with users or customers through natural language processing and generation.

[mariacallous]

Connecting the dots of recent research suggests a new future for traditional websites:

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered search can provide a full answer to a user’s query 75% of the time without the need for the user to go to a website, according to research by The Atlantic.

A worldwide survey from the University of Toronto revealed that 22% of ChatGPT users “use it as an alternative to Google.”

Research firm Gartner forecasts that traffic to the web from search engines will fall 25% by 2026.

Pew Research found that a quarter of all web pages developed between 2013 and 2023 no longer exist.

The large language models (LLMs) of generative AI that scraped their training data from websites are now using that data to eliminate the need to go to many of those same websites. Respected digital commentator Casey Newton concluded, “the web is entering a state of managed decline.” The Washington Post headline was more dire: “Web publishers brace for carnage as Google adds AI answers.”

From decentralized information to centralized conclusions

Created by Sir Tim Berners-Lee in 1989, the World Wide Web redefined the nature of the internet into a user-friendly linkage of diverse information repositories. “The first decade of the web…was decentralized with a long-tail of content and options,” Berners-Lee wrote this year on the occasion of its 35th anniversary.  Over the intervening decades, that vision of distributed sources of information has faced multiple challenges. The dilution of decentralization began with powerful centralized hubs such as Facebook and Google that directed user traffic. Now comes the ultimate disintegration of Berners-Lee’s vision as generative AI reduces traffic to websites by recasting their information.

The web’s open access to the world’s information trained the large language models (LLMs) of generative AI. Now, those generative AI models are coming for their progenitor.

The web allowed users to discover diverse sources of information from which to draw conclusions. AI cuts out the intellectual middleman to go directly to conclusions from a centralized source.

The AI paradigm of cutting out the middleman appears to have been further advanced in Apple’s recent announcement that it will incorporate OpenAI to enable its Siri app to provide ChatGPT-like answers. With this new deal, Apple becomes an AI-based disintermediator, not only eliminating the need to go to websites, but also potentially disintermediating the need for the Google search engine for which Apple has been paying $20 billion annually.

The Atlantic, University of Toronto, and Gartner studies suggest the Pew research on website mortality could be just the beginning. Generative AI’s ability to deliver conclusions cannibalizes traffic to individual websites threatening the raison d’être of all websites, especially those that are commercially supported.  

Echoes of traditional media and the web

The impact of AI on the web is an echo of the web’s earlier impact on traditional information providers. “The rise of digital media and technology has transformed the way we access our news and entertainment,” the U.S. Census Bureau reported in 2022, “It’s also had a devastating impact on print publishing industries.” Thanks to the web, total estimated weekday circulation of U.S. daily newspapers fell from 55.8 million in 2000 to 24.2 million by 2020, according to the Pew Research Center.

The World Wide Web also pulled the rug out from under the economic foundation of traditional media, forcing an exodus to proprietary websites. At the same time, it spawned a new generation of upstart media and business sites that took advantage of its low-cost distribution and high-impact reach. Both large and small websites now feel the impact of generative AI.   

Barry Diller, CEO of media owner IAC, harkened back to that history when he warned a year ago, “We are not going to let what happened out of free internet happen to post-AI internet if we can help it.” Ominously, Diller observed, “If all the world’s information is able to be sucked up in this maw, and then essentially repackaged in declarative sentence in what’s called chat but isn’t chat…there will be no publishing; it is not possible.”

The New York Times filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft alleging copyright infringement from the use of Times data to train LLMs. “Defendants seek to free-ride on The Times’s massive investment in its journalism,” the suit asserts, “to create products that substitute for The Times and steal audiences away from it.”1

Subsequently, eight daily newspapers owned by Alden Global Capital, the nation’s second largest newspaper publisher, filed a similar suit. “We’ve spent billions of dollars gathering information and reporting news at our publications, and we can’t allow OpenAI and Microsoft to expand the Big Tech playbook of stealing our work to build their own businesses at our expense,” a spokesman explained.

The legal challenges are pending. In a colorful description of the suits’ allegations, journalist Hamilton Nolan described AI’s threat as an “Automated Death Star.”

“Providential opportunity”?

Not all content companies agree. There has been a groundswell of leading content companies entering into agreements with OpenAI.

In July 2023, the Associated Press became the first major content provider to license its archive to OpenAI. Recently, however, the deal-making floodgates have opened. Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, home of The Wall Street Journal, New York Post, and multiple other publications in Australia and the United Kingdom, German publishing giant Axel Springer, owner of Politico in the U.S. and Bild  and Welt in Germany, venerable media company The Atlantic, along with new media company Vox Media, the Financial Times, Paris’ Le Monde, and Spain’s Prisa Media have all contracted with OpenAI for use of their product.

Even Barry Diller’s publishing unit, Dotdash Meredith, agreed to license to OpenAI, approximately a year after his apocalyptic warning.  

News Corp CEO Robert Thomson described his company’s rationale this way in an employee memo: “The digital age has been characterized by the dominance of distributors, often at the expense of creators, and many media companies have been swept away by a remorseless technological tide. The onus is now on us to make the most of this providential opportunity.”

“There is a premium for premium journalism,” Thomson observed. That premium, for News Corp, is reportedly $250 million over five years from OpenAI. Axel Springer’s three-year deal is reportedly worth $25 to $30 million. The Financial Times terms were reportedly in the annual range of $5 to $10 million.

AI companies’ different approaches

While publishers debate whether AI is “providential opportunity” or “stealing our work,” a similar debate is ongoing among AI companies. Different generative AI companies have different opinions whether to pay for content, and if so, which kind of content.

When it comes to scraping information from websites, most of the major generative AI companies have chosen to interpret copyright law’s “fair use doctrine” allowing the unlicensed use of copyrighted content in certain circumstances. Some of the companies have even promised to indemnify their users if they are sued for copyright infringement.

Google, whose core business is revenue generated by recommending websites, has not sought licenses to use the content on those websites. “The internet giant has long resisted calls to compensate media companies for their content, arguing that such payments would undermine the nature of the open web,” the New York Times explained. Google has, however, licensed the user-generated content on social media platform Reddit, and together with Meta has pursued Hollywood rights.

OpenAI has followed a different path. Reportedly, the company has been pitching a “Preferred Publisher Program” to select content companies. Industry publication AdWeek reported on a leaked presentation deck describing the program. The publication said OpenAI “disputed the accuracy of the information” but claimed to have confirmed it with four industry executives. Significantly, the OpenAI pitch reportedly offered not only cash remuneration, but also other benefits to cooperating publishers.    

As of early June 2024, other large generative AI companies have not entered into website licensing agreements with publishers.

Content companies surfing an AI tsunami

On the content creation side of the equation, major publishers are attempting to avoid a repeat of their disastrous experience in the early days of the web while smaller websites are fearful the impact on them could be even greater.

As the web began to take business from traditional publishers, their leadership scrambled to find a new economic model. Ultimately, that model came to rely on websites, even though website advertising offered them pennies on their traditional ad dollars. Now, even those assets are under attack by the AI juggernaut. The content companies are in a new race to develop an alternative economic model before their reliance on web search is cannibalized.

The OpenAI Preferred Publisher Program seems to be an attempt to meet the needs of both parties.

The first step in the program is direct compensation. To Barry Diller, for instance, the fact his publications will get “direct compensation for our content” means there is “no connection” between his apocalyptic warning 14 months ago and his new deal with OpenAI.

Reportedly, the cash compensation OpenAI is offering has two components: “guaranteed value” and “variable value.” Guaranteed value is compensation for access to the publisher’s information archive. Variable value is payment based on usage of the site’s information.

Presumably, those signing with OpenAI see it as only the first such agreement. “It is in my interest to find agreements with everyone,” Le Monde CEO Louis Dreyfus explained.   

But the issue of AI search is greater than simply cash. Atlantic CEO Nicolas Thompson described the challenge: “We believe that people searching with AI models will be one of the fundamental ways that people navigate to the web in the future.” Thus, the second component in OpenAI’s proposal to publishers appears to be promotion of publisher websites within the AI-generated content. Reportedly, when certain publisher content is utilized, there will be hyperlinks and hover links to the websites themselves, in addition to clickable buttons to the publisher.

Finally, the proposal reportedly offers publishers the opportunity to reshape their business using generative AI technology. Such tools include access to OpenAI content for the publishers’ use, as well as the use of OpenAI for writing stories and creating new publishing content.

Back to the future?

Whether other generative AI and traditional content companies embrace this kind of cooperation model remains to be seen. Without a doubt, however, the initiative by both parties will have its effects.

One such effect was identified in a Le Monde editorial explaining their licensing agreement with OpenAI. Such an agreement, they argued, “will make it more difficult for other AI platforms to evade or refuse to participate.” This, in turn, could have an impact on the copyright litigation, if not copyright law.

We have seen new technology-generated copyright issues resolved in this way before.2 Finding a credible solution that works for both sides is imperative. The promise of AI is an almost boundless expansion of information and the knowledge it creates. At the same time, AI cannot be a continued degradation of the free flow of ideas and journalism that is essential for democracy to function.

Newton’s Law in the AI age

In 1686 Sir Isaac Newton posited his three laws of motion. The third of these holds that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Newton described the consequence of physical activity; generative AI is raising the same consequential response for informational activity.

The threat of generative AI has pushed into the provision of information and the economics of information companies. We know the precipitating force, the consequential effects on the creation of content and free flow of information remain a work in progress.

[jcmarchi]

Future-Ready Enterprises: The Crucial Role of Large Vision Models (LVMs)

New Post has been published on https://thedigitalinsider.com/future-ready-enterprises-the-crucial-role-of-large-vision-models-lvms/

Future-Ready Enterprises: The Crucial Role of Large Vision Models (LVMs)

What are Large Vision Models (LVMs)

Over the last few decades, the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has experienced rapid growth, resulting in significant changes to various aspects of human society and business operations. AI has proven to be useful in task automation and process optimization, as well as in promoting creativity and innovation. However, as data complexity and diversity continue to increase, there is a growing need for more advanced AI models that can comprehend and handle these challenges effectively. This is where the emergence of Large Vision Models (LVMs) becomes crucial.

LVMs are a new category of AI models specifically designed for analyzing and interpreting visual information, such as images and videos, on a large scale, with impressive accuracy. Unlike traditional computer vision models that rely on manual feature crafting, LVMs leverage deep learning techniques, utilizing extensive datasets to generate authentic and diverse outputs. An outstanding feature of LVMs is their ability to seamlessly integrate visual information with other modalities, such as natural language and audio, enabling a comprehensive understanding and generation of multimodal outputs.

LVMs are defined by their key attributes and capabilities, including their proficiency in advanced image and video processing tasks related to natural language and visual information. This includes tasks like generating captions, descriptions, stories, code, and more. LVMs also exhibit multimodal learning by effectively processing information from various sources, such as text, images, videos, and audio, resulting in outputs across different modalities.

Additionally, LVMs possess adaptability through transfer learning, meaning they can apply knowledge gained from one domain or task to another, with the capability to adapt to new data or scenarios through minimal fine-tuning. Moreover, their real-time decision-making capabilities empower rapid and adaptive responses, supporting interactive applications in gaming, education, and entertainment.

How LVMs Can Boost Enterprise Performance and Innovation?

Adopting LVMs can provide enterprises with powerful and promising technology to navigate the evolving AI discipline, making them more future-ready and competitive. LVMs have the potential to enhance productivity, efficiency, and innovation across various domains and applications. However, it is important to consider the ethical, security, and integration challenges associated with LVMs, which require responsible and careful management.

Moreover, LVMs enable insightful analytics by extracting and synthesizing information from diverse visual data sources, including images, videos, and text. Their capability to generate realistic outputs, such as captions, descriptions, stories, and code based on visual inputs, empowers enterprises to make informed decisions and optimize strategies. The creative potential of LVMs emerges in their ability to develop new business models and opportunities, particularly those using visual data and multimodal capabilities.

Prominent examples of enterprises adopting LVMs for these advantages include Landing AI, a computer vision cloud platform addressing diverse computer vision challenges, and Snowflake, a cloud data platform facilitating LVM deployment through Snowpark Container Services. Additionally, OpenAI, contributes to LVM development with models like GPT-4, CLIP, DALL-E, and OpenAI Codex, capable of handling various tasks involving natural language and visual information.

In the post-pandemic landscape, LVMs offer additional benefits by assisting enterprises in adapting to remote work, online shopping trends, and digital transformation. Whether enabling remote collaboration, enhancing online marketing and sales through personalized recommendations, or contributing to digital health and wellness via telemedicine, LVMs emerge as powerful tools.

Challenges and Considerations for Enterprises in LVM Adoption

While the promises of LVMs are extensive, their adoption is not without challenges and considerations. Ethical implications are significant, covering issues related to bias, transparency, and accountability. Instances of bias in data or outputs can lead to unfair or inaccurate representations, potentially undermining the trust and fairness associated with LVMs. Thus, ensuring transparency in how LVMs operate and the accountability of developers and users for their consequences becomes essential.

Security concerns add another layer of complexity, requiring the protection of sensitive data processed by LVMs and precautions against adversarial attacks. Sensitive information, ranging from health records to financial transactions, demands robust security measures to preserve privacy, integrity, and reliability.

Integration and scalability hurdles pose additional challenges, especially for large enterprises. Ensuring compatibility with existing systems and processes becomes a crucial factor to consider. Enterprises need to explore tools and technologies that facilitate and optimize the integration of LVMs. Container services, cloud platforms, and specialized platforms for computer vision offer solutions to enhance the interoperability, performance, and accessibility of LVMs.

To tackle these challenges, enterprises must adopt best practices and frameworks for responsible LVM use. Prioritizing data quality, establishing governance policies, and complying with relevant regulations are important steps. These measures ensure the validity, consistency, and accountability of LVMs, enhancing their value, performance, and compliance within enterprise settings.

Future Trends and Possibilities for LVMs

With the adoption of digital transformation by enterprises, the domain of LVMs is poised for further evolution. Anticipated advancements in model architectures, training techniques, and application areas will drive LVMs to become more robust, efficient, and versatile. For example, self-supervised learning, which enables LVMs to learn from unlabeled data without human intervention, is expected to gain prominence.

Likewise, transformer models, renowned for their ability to process sequential data using attention mechanisms, are likely to contribute to state-of-the-art outcomes in various tasks. Similarly, Zero-shot learning, allowing LVMs to perform tasks they have not been explicitly trained on, is set to expand their capabilities even further.

Simultaneously, the scope of LVM application areas is expected to widen, encompassing new industries and domains. Medical imaging, in particular, holds promise as an avenue where LVMs could assist in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of various diseases and conditions, including cancer, COVID-19, and Alzheimer’s.

In the e-commerce sector, LVMs are expected to enhance personalization, optimize pricing strategies, and increase conversion rates by analyzing and generating images and videos of products and customers. The entertainment industry also stands to benefit as LVMs contribute to the creation and distribution of captivating and immersive content across movies, games, and music.

To fully utilize the potential of these future trends, enterprises must focus on acquiring and developing the necessary skills and competencies for the adoption and implementation of LVMs. In addition to technical challenges, successfully integrating LVMs into enterprise workflows requires a clear strategic vision, a robust organizational culture, and a capable team. Key skills and competencies include data literacy, which encompasses the ability to understand, analyze, and communicate data.

The Bottom Line

In conclusion, LVMs are effective tools for enterprises, promising transformative impacts on productivity, efficiency, and innovation. Despite challenges, embracing best practices and advanced technologies can overcome hurdles. LVMs are envisioned not just as tools but as pivotal contributors to the next technological era, requiring a thoughtful approach. A practical adoption of LVMs ensures future readiness, acknowledging their evolving role for responsible integration into business processes.

[girderednerve]

in honor of tumblr's impending data sale to midjourney (go turn off third-party sharing if you haven't), consider glancing through this article that explains a little bit about what tumblr probably means by "discouraging AI crawlers." the article goes into it more, but here's a summary:

crawlers are little programs which bounce around between linked pages, copying what they find to a server for temporary storage. they're how google and other search engines find content to show you in search results and how companies building large language models "scrape" the internet.

if website owners don't want some crawler or other to look at their content, basically what they do is put a simply formatted text file, robots.txt, in their website directory, which lists the web crawlers that they don't want on their site or which pages they want crawlers to avoid. not all websites have one, but many do. you can see tumblr's right here; it lists some major AI crawlers and bans them from the site entirely, and exempts some other content from being indexed by major crawlers, like google.

the thing here to note is that robots.txt documents represent a request that is generally respected. they aren't strictly enforceable—it's not like a firewall—they're just a longstanding norm of the internet. but there's been an explosion of startups in AI, so there are a lot of companies with crawlers, and it may become increasingly difficult for websites to keep up with the crawlers in circulation. different crawlers are treated differently, so each new crawler needs to be listed separately in these documents. openAI only announced the name of its crawler and the associated IP address so websites could block it after building a large, and currently very valuable, training dataset. it's also very possible that some of these new companies will operate unscrupulously and ignore requests in robots.txt files. in some sense, there are very few practical options for larger websites to avoid being included in AI training datasets.

that's the environment that automattic is responding to with the deal with midjourney. i don't think we need to take this move as deliberately hostile towards users (automattic is hostile in other ways!); instead, it's taking advantage of a current market moment to try to monetize tumblr. reddit did much the same in preparation for its IPO. you might wonder why AI companies that can scrape data from the internet would pay for that data; well, the legal standing of AI is an undecided, very murky issue, with multiple open cases, including a high-profile one brought by the new york times. AI companies may hope that if they purchase the right to use data from websites (which have the ability to change the terms of service their users are bound by at any moment), that they will be protected from potential future copyright fallout.

[bookstorechannel]

5 Ways to Enhance Your Video Marketing Strategy with ChatGPT

With the “ReelExpress Ai ChaptGPT power Course” you get practical step by step instructions on how to use the power of ChaptGPT to create ready-made video scripts and viral reel videos for Instagram, Facebook, Tiktok and Youtube in just a few minutes by OpenAI cofounder Greg Brockman.

ChatGPT is an AI-powered chatbot that can assist you with various tasks, including generating ideas for different types of video content, researching popular video trends in your industry, and creating video scripts on any topic you like. In this blog post, we'll explore five ways you can use ChatGPT to enhance your video marketing efforts and reach a wider audience.

1. Generate Ideas for Different Types of Video Content

One of the most significant advantages of using ChatGPT is that it can generate ideas for different types of video content. For instance, ChatGPT can suggest how-to videos, product demos, customer testimonials, animated videos, explainer videos, and more.

2. Research Popular Video Trends in Your Industry

ChatGPT can help you research what kind of videos are popular in your industry or what kind of videos are doing well on social media.

By analyzing social media data, ChatGPT can provide insights into which types of video content are most engaging for your target audience. This information can help you create videos that resonate with your audience and increase your brand's visibility.

>>> GET A FREE How to Rank in Youtube, Tiktok, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter EBOOK HERE <<<

>>> GET A FULL COURSE ReelExpress Ai ChatGPT Power Course HERE FOR A DISCOUNT <<<

3. Create Video Scripts on Any Topic You Like

If you're struggling to come up with a video script on a particular topic, ChatGPT can help. By inputting a topic or a keyword, ChatGPT can generate a script that you can use as the basis for your video.

We recommend starting with how-to videos, as these are among the most popular types of video content.

4. Generate Ideas for Video Titles, Descriptions, and Tags

In addition to generating video scripts, ChatGPT can also help you come up with video titles, descriptions, and tags.

By using ChatGPT to optimize your videos for search engines, you can increase the likelihood that your videos will appear in search results, driving more traffic to your website.

5. Create Captions and Subtitles for Videos

ChatGPT can help you create captions and subtitles for your videos. This can make your videos more accessible to a wider audience, including those with hearing impairments. Here is a quick tutorial on how to do that: Additionally, captions and subtitles can make your videos more searchable, as search engines can crawl the text and use it to rank your video.

....................Continue Reading........................