#APLI

[moonyhasmanyanimals]

Happy one year anniversary APTR!! You made me cry and happy. And I am glad that another will be coming out!!!

[vamosgk]

🟤Bamos

#gipsykings

Las Apli kids XXL

del Continente

#vamos #bamos

#hanem #graffiti

#tag #solid

#solidmarker

#tagsandthrows

#letters #handstyle

#backtoschool

#materialescolar

#Apli #aplikids

#slowlife

🙋🏻‍♂️

🙅🏻‍♂️

✨

[bluelicorfino]

Jettwins lore, right?

Based on this:

[ohoh-inmortal]

Simon's always sighing deeply and at the beginning of your relationship you thought it was because he was disappointed or mad at you but then you realized is just because dummy forgets to breathe and is always tired

[feelingthedisaster]

nothing hits harder than when that character who always wears suits wears something non-formal

[minzart]

And it was at this moment Everett realized that everything he creates(be it biologicaly or mechanicaly) has a 50/50 chance of falling in love with Donald Duck also know as The Avenger

First Uno, now Juniper, Donald's Rizz is unmatched truly

[ghostboy-art]

I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned this in relation to Dr. Two Brains but its been plauging my mind.

So, both rats and mice do a thing called boggling. In moments in which they are happy, they grind their teeth together, causing their eyes to bulge out. I think it happens because of the way their muscles are laid out on their face? I'm not an expert on rodent biology.

Anyways, in the show, Dr. Two Brains is shown to do a similar thing multiple times in the show when he gets excited, as shown in these images

After he is done evil laughing or doing whatever he is doing while his eyes are like that, they return to normal, as shown here.

I'm just curious if this could actually be construed as boggling? If it was intentional or just a trait that they added in a few times? (though this is a repeated thing..) And if it would even be possible with the way Dr. Two Brains face is constructed??

I have many questions.

[pixelatedraindrops]

I’ve been looking into nui dolls lately and an idea came to my head…

lil concept art:

THEY TEENY…

I’d give them blankets, beds and everything 🥹💕

Man how I wish I could have this in my life… ;w;

[ann7av]

I can't decide if I'd rather be Violet's friend, girlfriend, sister-in-law, or stepmother but honestly... yes

[chocokeyboard]

They will be completly fine!

[asketchydomesticatedgremlin]

I'm not falling back into it i swear.

these guys are just good to get the doodles goin!! im not going back into UTY no im not nuhuh noooo

(commissions are still open! look here if you want something like this but even more polished!)

[earlblxck]

Here’s Alphys from my AU! I like how this turned out, this is a first time I used the pinterest thingies (I dunno how to call these decorations properly help 😭) in my drawing

Being a Royal Scientist, Alphys may look like a successful person, but for some reason she doesn’t really like to talk about her projects. And don’t ask her what’s behind that door, the info is highly confidential!

[immortal-enemies]

I knew Odysseus had finally appeared in Circe when this guy showed up and immediately started talking abt his wife.

[ariddletobesolved]

of preferences and headcanons.

Hi! I know I haven't posted real content in over a year, but since I've been on Tumblr the past week, I can't help but notice a discourse happening on Helsa tag.

I believe as a community, we should all respect other people's takes and opinions, especially in a fandom, where everyone may perceive things differently. Everyone has their own preferences that not everyone could get or understand, and that is okay. For example, and also to address the elephant in the room, if you prefer a ship (in this case, Helsa) to not be canon, it's totally fine. And if you would love for it to be canon, then that is fine too. It's not okay when you try to tell people how they must feel towards a certain media (in this case, Frozen) and tell fellow shippers they're not a true shipper just because they don't share the same preferences as you do. Stating an opinion of your preference is not the same as telling others to change that preference to suit the one that you like.

"I would prefer to not have them to be canon."

"If you're a true fan, you would have done THIS instead!"

See how different those two sentences are? The first one is neutral, while the other one is more demanding.

Honestly, I want to respect both, but I believe respect is earned and not given, and if the person is being disrespectful then I will return the disrespect back to their faces. Treat people the way you want be treated, remember?

I've been in between fandoms for over a decade, so I've come across discourses over headcanons and preferences plenty of time. Here's a reminder: Be respectful! It's not hard if you recognise that everyone perceive things differently and that the world doesn't revolve around you and your opinions only. You can always agree to disagree.

Being respectful also means being respectful to fanartists and fanwriters. Have some decency and refrain from using someone else's works without their permission (it's not hard to ask!). Just because you found it on Google does not mean it's public domain. As for appreciating fanwriters, you can start by reading what you want to read. You can start by filtering keywords and tropes or genres that you don't like. AO3 has a tagging system for a reason. If you don't pay attention to the tags, don't blame the writer for writing what they want to write and not how you want it. They create contents for free and you are not the boss of them. If you want something that specifically suits your taste buds, you can commission them.

Learn how to differentiate between what's canon and what's your own headcanon and interpretations, what's canon and what's a mere concept. Maybe you're reading too much into it, maybe it's in your head. Headcanons are fun, being delulu is literally my middle name, but not everything that you perceive is canon. You can disregard canon (like I do, most of the time) but you have to be clear about it, and draw a hard line to separate them, label them with 'canon divergence' or 'canon compliance' (you can look up each definition). A concept that did not make into the final product can hardly be considered canon.

This fandom community is supposed to be a safe space for everyone regardless their reason in shipping Helsa (be it because of their appealing aesthetics or others) as long as they're being respectful to each other. I didn't think I would be here writing all these to address the bad apples. Sure, the bad apples are always there in every community, but when these bad apples are the loud majority, I feel like I have to say something to clear up some misconceptions about this fandom. Helsa fandom isn't exactly popular, even back in the day, and it's mostly because shippers of other ships and fandom purists have already assumed the worst when they interacted with the ship before they did the shipper, which once again is out of the shippers' control.

From my experience, name-calling fellow shippers over these niche stuff will drive people away and discourage some creators from creating content (I already am on this stage). So, in my opinion, let's just agree to disagree. It's probably just me, but it's not like we have the power to make the writers write what we want anyway (Frozen 2 is already a proof that they would write what they want to write).

[ittydoor]

saw vylad fanart and was literally confused as to why the man was not brown

forgot bro is canonically paler than garroth

[nonexistent-creature]

I started out majoring in engineering, but honestly, due to my very specific math based brainworms, I could never do a lot of engineering jobs. Like to me math is kinda like an art. like when you have a really good equation and everything just clicks into place, i have a kind of reverence for it. I mean here you have this thing that can tell you new interesting and useful things about the world and corporations want to use it to figure out how to screw over their workers a little bit more. How to make their product a little cheaper, fuck quality and fuck how wasteful it may be! the company is saving 0.00000001 cents per unit! To me it's perverse, it's like using starry night to roll cigarettes. Like yeah I guess it technically works but it's definitely disrespectful and also maybe it would be better for everyone if we didn't make cigarettes at all? I guess my point is that math shouldn't be used to make things worse.