#90's anime asthetic

[cute-girls-from-vns-anime-manga]

Creators of Mullet Madjack really knocked it out of the park making her design!!!

Also the game is fantastic! Go wishlist it if you like FPS games!

[roberhetero]

[no-zzzom]

AHHHHHH @soulspark too awesome

[mommy-mortis]

[idreamofeletricsheep]

Emmyrea (PS1)

[cutiepoototie3]

⌢⌢⌢⌢⌢⌢⌢⌢⌢⌢⌢⌢⌢⌢

﹉﹉﹉﹉﹉୨♡୧﹉﹉﹉﹉﹉

╰─ ♡ about me!

୨୧┇name: it’s a secret 🤫 (ᴵ ᵈᵒⁿ’ᵗ ʷᵃⁿᵗ ᵗᵒ ᵖᵘᵗ ᵃⁿʸ ᵖᵉʳˢᵒⁿᵃˡ ⁱⁿᶠᵒʳᵐᵃᵗⁱᵒⁿ ˢʳʳʸ 😔)

୨୧┇pronouns: she/her🎀

୨୧┇age: 17😜✨

﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍

╰─ ♡ my favorite...

୨୧┇color: ･ﾟ* 🎀 𝒫𝐼𝒩𝒦 🎀 *ﾟ･

୨୧┇animal: BURDS! I love parrots :3

୨୧┇songs: I got to many songs to list 😔 but I love 70’s 80’s 90’s 2000’s

୨୧┇anime: I stopped watching anime but my favorite ghibli movie is ponyo🩵

୨୧┇games: legends of Zelda (breath of wild) (tears of kingdom) in general I really like story games and I play Minecraft, stardew valley, sims, any Mario or Nintendo game, Roblox, etc

﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍

╰─ ♡ interests & more!

୨୧┇likes: 🐹 🎀 𝐻𝐸𝐿𝐿🍪 𝒦𝐼𝒯𝒯𝒴 🎀 🐹 (seriously if you get me anything hello kitty I WILL marry you) I like calico critters, mostly collecting cute figurines and anything mini! XD, I like Disney (old Disney), vintage things, music, art, I LOVE dumplings 🥟, ice cream is my fav, I love cookies, I like to read occasionally and write my own stories (*cough* fanfiction *cough cough*)

୨୧┇dislikes: mushrooms >:C mean people, FEET I HATE FEET.

﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍

⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣

⋆｡𖦹°‧₊ ⊹————————જ⁀➴

┆ ✿ I think I’ll be posting cute things or asthetics

┆ ✿ I can be unhinged sometimes 😭

┆ ❀ I don’t think I’ll be on tumbler alot fyi 😔

˚ ༘ ೀ˚✿˖°——————————•

FYI I do post cute aesthetic things here but I will be posting like.. mature content. So if you’re younger than 17 or 18 just be careful what you see on my page!

I don’t want to traumatize anyone 💗

I don’t think I have the asks thingy. But if I do you can ask questions just be mindful please 😊

[deepdreamnights]

A lot of this is spot on, but I think the choice of tools has skewed the data here, however, and may give an incorrect impression of how AI art tools on the whole work, because Dall-E 3 isn't representative of the options at large.

Dall-E 3 is pretty (if you make it be) and has good coherency and works with more naturally written prompts, but it is wholly uncooperative and has almost zero workflow accommodations for artistic applications, heck, It can't even do non-square aspect ratios (at least through Bing).

Playground AI beats it out on those fronts, and Midjourney and Stable Diffusion piledrive it into the concrete.

The only reason to ever use Dall-E 3's chat GPT interface is if you want to run up to three jobs simultaneously on a free bing account. It routinely misinterprets input, even direct "replace this word in the prompt with this other word" requests. It's essentially playing whisper-telephone with two hallucinating robots instead of one.

Here's how the process would go down in Midjourney:

Gonna be making a 90s fighting game version of my DeinoSteve character. Goal is to keep him largely on-model, minus changes that work for the style change from 70s comic/80s cartoon to 90s fighting game.

Prompt: fullbody character design, a velociraptor-anthro fighting game character, in the style of 1996 Capcom (Darkstalkers 3/Street Fighter Alpha 3) promotional art, fullbody on white background. Red scales, yellow shirt, black leather jacket, long tail, clawed feet, long tail, retrosaur asthetics, vector art inks with flat anime shading

Aspect ratio 3:4, Niji model v6, style 50:

Some pretty good stables at DeinoSteve (left image), but nobody's quite right. I've got several ways to get him kitted out right, but we'll use the same techniques CGPT was trying to use: inpainting and variations.

Upper right is closer to the character concept, but I like upper left's pose better, so we'll start by doing some variations on the subtle setting (right image)

You'll notice the variation problem from Dall-E 3 isn't there. Using Chat-GPT to change the prompt means you're at the mercy of two hallucinating robots instead of one, and it's probably been altering the prompt wildly with each revision, thus the slow degradation of mural-jesus.

Now, I'm just demonstrating in-system tools here, but on a piece that I was doing for finalization, I'd be upscaling all the ones that had features I liked, for later composition.

Steve looks... okay here, but he's off model in several major ways. Pants wrong color, no full-t-shirt, the spines on the tail, etc.

So here we'll do some inpainting. Unlike the GPT setup, I'm laying out what areas I specifically want changed at each go. Starting with the pants, I forgot to mention in the first prompt he wears blue jeans, so I add that to the prompt as well. If you're out to do your own post-editing, you can hit more parts at once and just composite from fewer gens.

I like #4 (left)'s swagger, so we'll repeat the process to get him full sleeves on his jacket, and to remove the spiked wrist cuffs. #4, again, is my winner. Now, I can keep varying individual bits, but I can also return to doing general variations, and the influence from the current version will carry over.

Now, it will me re-doing some bits, but #2 is pretty sweet, so he'll be where I tinker next. Note how a bit of his tail and claws are cropped out. I can fix that with outpainting.

If I were instead going for an edit in post, I'd probably have taken the best 5-6 chunks, merged, dropped to line art, then recolored by this point.

Now, I can keep tinkering on him bit by bit, put part of using the AI system is knowing when you're going to have to go manual. I know from experience that my chance of getting him to have his raptor-foot claws is going to require me to go in and do 'em manually.

If its not the horns and claws on dinosaurs, its hairstyles and clothing details on humans, the nature of using a randomized system is that you're going to get random hiccups.

But there are ways to mitigate that, depending on your toolset. Stable Diffusion has controlnet, different versions of which let you control things like poses, character details, and composition more directly, (as I understand it. I haven't messed with it myself, don't have that kind of beastly graphics card)

MJ's answer is presently in alpha: character reference. It's an extension of their image-prompting system (which isn't the same as image-to-image), wherein an image is examined by the AI's image-identification/checking processes and the results are used as part of the prompt. For Character reference, it tries to drop everything that isn't connected to character design.

A quickie iteration using a handful of previous DeinoSteve pics made the image on the left, while re-running the prompt with the semi-final DeinoSteve above as a character prompt produced the images on the right.

Of course, even with the additional workflow tools you get with non-DallE generators, doing anything with long-term consistency is going to require manual editing.

Anything with narrative? Well, this panel has over 20 individual gens in it, from across two generators (MJ and Dall-E 3)

The AI systems will get better over time, but there's an inherent paradox that I don't think they'll escape. To get to complex results you need complex control, and to gain complex control you need, well, complex controls

The more stuff an AI generator can do, the more literal and figurative buttons and/or menus you need to use those features. The more complex the features, the more knowledge and practice it takes to utilize them. Essentially: Any tool capable of (heavy air quotes) "replacing" an artist will wind up requiring an artist to operate it at that level.

As with other force-multipliers for art (photography, digital image manipulation, automated image touchup/filtering, etc) the skill gradient never goes away.

Among the many downsides of AI-generated art: it's bad at revising. You know, the biggest part of the process when working on commissioned art.

Original "deer in a grocery store" request from chatgpt (which calls on dalle3 for image generation):

revision 5 (trying to give the fawn spots, trying to fix the shadows that were making it appear to hover):

I had it restore its own Jesus fresco.

Original:

Erased the face, asked it to restore the image to as good as when it was first painted:

Wait tumblr makes the image really low-res, let me zoom in on Jesus's face.

Original:

Restored:

One revision later:

Here's the full "restored" face in context:

Every time AI is asked to revise an image, it either wipes it and starts over or makes it more and more of a disaster. People who work with AI-generated imagery have to adapt their creative vision to what comes out of the system - or go in with a mentality that anything that fits the brief is good enough.

I'm not surprised that there are some places looking for cheap filler images that don't mind the problems with AI-generated imagery. But for everyone else I think it's quickly becoming clear that you need a real artist, not a knockoff.

more

[lofi-wave]

[bluedott]

[ruhelosetraume]

This girl...

[roberhetero]

[solivag]

By Solivag

please like/reblog (^^)

[mtndewgang-exe]

Yo, Angelo.

[theguywithchainsaw]

Sad Dreams

Instagram

[lofihearts]

♡ lofihearts ♡