#2013 R1 | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

allisonmourning · 3 months ago

Text

𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕮𝖍𝖆𝖗𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖆𝖓

🎀🖤🎀💜 The Charlatan 2013 💜🎀🖤🎀

🎀🖤🎀💜 The Charlatan 2014 💜🎀🖤🎀

Additional vocals: Prima

Behind every smile is a broken mirror In which we find the crying Reflection of ourselves, But what is now left of this smile I feign? Nothing but you, and you wear It like it gives You pleasure.

But I see You're rotting Inside.

You have deceived all of the people who believe In your web of lies, And they'll forsake you once they see through Your guise.

You talk like me And you laugh like me - Go ahead and hide your cowardly self inside Of my skin, for I Still know what is real and what is Fake.

Release your dove: Pretend you're At peace When you want war.

How can I Remain neutral When you provoke Me and Pretend As though you aren't just the Imitation of a person You saw as blithe?

All this time, you were better Than me, and yet You can't Stand to Face yourself, so rotten - Hide it, become someone else.

Say you want war.

I will not Remain neutral When you kill me, Screw me, And try To pin all the blame on Everyone else; you save yourself And fuck the rest.

All this time, you were greater Than me, yet you Persist In veiling whom you truly are: Hide it, pretend that you're me.

🎀🖤🎀💜 The Charlatan 2015 💜🎀🖤🎀

Additional vocals: Avanna

🎀🖤🎀💜 The Charlatan 2017 💜🎀🖤🎀

Additional vocals: Ruby

🎀🖤🎀💜 The Charlatan 2020 💜🎀🖤🎀

Additional Vocals: Ethera

Behind every smile is a broken mirror In which we find the crying Reflection of ourselves, But what is now left of this smile I feign? Nothing but you, and you wear It like it gives You pleasure.

But I see You're rotting Inside your lies.

You have deceived all of the people who are desperate To believe in you, But they'll forsake you once they see through Your guise.

You talk like me And you laugh like me - Go ahead and hide your cowardly self inside of My skin, but I still Know what's me, and which name you have Co-opted.

Release your dove: Pretend you're At peace When you want war.

How can I Remain neutral When you provoke Me and Pretend As though you aren't just the Imitation of a person You saw as spry?

All this time, you were better Than me, and yet You can't Stand to Face yourself, so rotten - Hide it, become someone else.

Say you want war.

I will not Remain neutral When you kill me, Screw me, And try To pin all the blame on Everyone else; you save yourself And fuck the rest.

All this time, you were greater Than me, yet you Persist In veiling whom you truly are: Hide it, pretend that you're me.

🎀🖤🎀💜 The Charlatan 2021 💜🎀🖤🎀

Additional Vocals: Ethera

Behind every smile is a broken mirror In which we find the crying Reflection of ourselves, But what is now left of this smile I feign? Nothing but you, and you wear It like it gives You pleasure.

But I see You're rotting Inside your lies.

You have deceived all of the people who are desperate For your compliments, But they'll forsake you once they see through Your guise.

You talk like me And you laugh like me - Go ahead and hide your cowardly self inside of My skin, but I still Know what's me, and which name you have Co-opted.

Release your dove: Pretend you're At peace When you want war!

How can I Remain neutral When you provoke Me and Pretend As though you aren't just the Imitation of a person You saw as blithe?

All this time, you were better Than me, and yet You can't Stand to Face yourself, so rotten - Hide it, become someone else.

Say you want war!

I will not Remain neutral When you kill me, Screw me, And try To pin all the blame on Everyone else; you save yourself And fuck the rest!

All this time, you were greater Than me, yet you Persist In veiling whom you truly are: Hide it, pretend that you're me.

#🎵#The Charlatan #Winter Butterfly #Winter Butterfly 2017 #Demos #Vocaloid #SynthV #Avanna #Prima #AquesTone #Gumi #Cyber Diva #Eleanor Forte #2013 #2014 #2015 #2017 #2020 #2021

3 notes · View notes

kalina-c · 2 years ago

Text

(Dark Souls/Elden Ring posting) Split Damage Doesn't Suck. In fact it is the best damage in the game for a significant percentage of situations and setups.

Part 2 (ctrl-f “so let’s count up the ways”) Part 3

Stumbled upon a youtube review of elden ring's daggers and rapiers, the critical hit weapons, in response to patch 1.10 the patch specifically buffing ripostes and backstabs, and the first and constant thing the youtuber says is that Split Damage Sucks?

My friends, Split Damage is so very specifically the final form of specifically critical hits in particular that Chaos Daggers have been the parry king weapon of dark souls 3 since forever.

There's a hundred and one details about how "split damage sucks" came to be accepted wisdom and why it's actually wrong in way more situations than you'd think, but in the first place, just, if you're looking for a good dagger for backstabs and ripostes, Split Damage Is The Absolute Best. A weapon that gives you elemental damage right away without any whetstones/ash hunting just yet, and on the weapon class that specifically multiplies elemental damage in particular to high numbers on its signature attack? Surprisingly good utilization of the game systems! (The weapon in question might suck, but for entirely different reasons than being the same damage type as the kind of Misericorde that can do ~3k ripostes.)

Split damage weapons are so good at crits that a dark souls 3 character with fire gem starting gift and a Fire Dagger +0 as soon as you reach Firelink gets a gigantic 500-600 damage one-shot weapon for absolute free, on like nearly everything in the early game. Conventional wisdom was that the best lightweight riposte in dark souls 1 was a normal +15 rapier with a damage buff applied, which is hilariously easily disproven by side-by-side testing with any Chaos or Enchanted Rapier maxed out in the same game.

So anyway, let's get into the really autistic detailed breakdown of the whole thing right after the break.

So why does "Split Damage Suck"?

Probably someone tried a magic weapon on their pure physical build and found it to do less damage than a pure physical weapon with a buff applied. They then needed an explanation for why that happens.

I don't know if that's exactly what happened, but going by the way "split damage sucks" reacts to the fact of elemental damage and the lightning infusion in elden ring, that is like literally the only thing I've ever seen it saying in practice.

Isn't that just making a bad build decision and blaming it on the weapon?

Literally yup! But for the sake of fairness we'll just leave that aside and focus on the facts of how split damage works in practice.

But isn't it worse to apply damage multiple times and eat defense multiple times, than to do one big number and eat defense only once?

Technically yes! in an extreme case. When I was taking my sorcerer through my first dark souls 1 run and damage testing on the crystal golems in Seath's garden, I found that Dark Bead did significantly less total damage than Crystal Soul Spear.

Yes, Dark Bead did less total damage than Crystal Soul Spear. In Dark Souls 1. The game where Dark Bead is so overpowered that pvp'ers everywhere have been spamming and dreading it since the original release of the DLC and PtDE, and that speedrunners have been incorporating it into all bosses routes until move swap completely obliterated the game.

Do you begin to see the problem with just a flat 1:1 damage comparison on paper. Theoretically, in the right very situational interaction, using only the same R1 to R1,

on a specific build at that not even all builds because the specific reason I've been researching and testing this stuff since my first dark souls character in 2013 or so, is because of finding that my pure int build did the opposite of what people said and I did gigantic R1 damage with split damage and absolutely piss-poor R1 damage with unsplit damage,

yes a split-damage weapon can do less damage than an unsplit weapon. Theoretically. Not in practice, where for every other enemy and especially boss in the game the literally split damage by definition Dark Bead is specifically the singular most broken attack in all of Dark Souls 1; or Chaos Dagger backstabs and split damage Lothric Knight Greatsword charged R2's do the best-in-class damage for their respective weapon classes; or the optimal speedrun route in Dark Souls 3 involves tumblebuffing a Fire Shortsword which is *literally* actually a three-way split damage attack, *never* an unsplit damage stack even when it's fire buff on fire infusion.

---

The fact that this canard took off during Dark Souls 1 in particular is actually pretty specifically egregious, because like,

The overwhelming very smart-sounding argument is that if you look at the AR on paper of an unsplit weapon at 300 physical attack, vs the AR of a split weapon at 150 physical and 150 fire, and then apply the damage formula with such and so defensive values, you will see that the 300 AR, on paper, does better damage than the 150 + 150 on-paper AR.

In other words, it's an all-in focus on AR to AR, in the status screen only, as if that is always a reliable indicator of how much damage a weapon will do when it hits.

Friends, we're talking about a game that specifically has a weapon that contradicts every possible thing about that entire understanding of AR, and one that does so to such a spectacular degree that it is far and away one of the most popular weapons in that entire game.

There's two "middleweight" weapons in dark souls 1 that are notable for kind of punching above their weight, the Great Scythe and the Claymore. The Claymore is an eternal series favorite (and my actual vote in Elden Ring for best main-hand weapon in a powerstance generally) because it is pretty much always the only great sword with a thrusting attack in its moveset. The Claymore bounces back and forth in the relative ranking of how much AR/attack power/etc it has in its weapon class depending on the game, but the fact of the thrusting attack's speed and safety and counter damage means that the Claymore is frequently a real contender no matter what the game.

Now here's the real rub. The Claymore and the Great Scythe in Dark Souls 1 occupy the same niche, in being a high ROI weapon for the weight and the stat requirements. The Claymore has a higher AR than the Great Scythe for any given build and infusion (called ascension in souls 1), but the Great Scythe can consistently do more damage than the Claymore, not just on one or two attacks, but on the entire moveset unless there's a counter hit situation where the Claymore can do more damage. (Counter hits with thrusts are so punishingly precise in Dark Souls 1 that I never learned how to land them consistently enough for easy damage testing.) This should be the first clue that AR on the status screen isn't everything and that there's multiple multiple multipliers and damage variance between movesets that goes into just a normal, unbuffed R1 on a normal enemy before we apply any buffs, rings, special defense situations, etc.

The Monster Hunter community coined the term "motion value" to refer to the fact that each move in a given weapon's move set applies a multiplier to the attack number on its status screen before anything else in the damage formula applies, and the term has found obvious use in describing basically the same combat design philosophy in Dark Souls. Say a longsword does like 80%, 80%, 100% on its first R1, second R1, and uncharged R2. (I don't know the exact numbers, but anyway) That means that a 300 AR longsword is doing 240 AR, 240 AR, or 300 AR on those attacks, before defensive values are applied.

The Great Scythe very obviously, very blatantly has Motion Values that are bigger than its AR on paper suggests, on every one of its moves. I've run Enchanted vs Enchanted Great Scythe and Claymore side by side on enough sorcerer runs to know that it's in there and on the entire moveset, not just the riposte that impressed everyone looking for the best dex weapon back in the day. This is also blatantly the reason Chaos Daggers are the best ripostes in Dark Souls 3. The riposte attack on a dagger's moveset already multiplies the attack power to an absurd degree, way bigger than any singular number from any other weapon class on any attack (save for ultra greatsword and similar weight charged R2); and then Dagger applies the highest crit modifier in its weapon class for the biggest number yet.

Contrary to what it looks like on paper, a split-AR Chaos Dagger is not doing split damage at all in the slightest, it's doing the most concentrated unsplit fire elemental damage all at once to the enemy's defense, and then a nice beefy concentrated unsplit big fat physical damage number on top. This is literally the same reason Magic Misericorde and Dark Moon Greatsword with its weapon buff up in Elden Ring do damn near the highest crit damage in the entire game.

---

There's a hundred other fun little details too about how people have entirely the wrong understanding of split damage, even when they're really really good at beating dark souls in the most skillful of ways. GDQ events will tell you that tumblebuffing fire resin onto a fire weapon will give you better damage than applying lightning damage onto the fire weapon, implicitly because Split Damage Sucks ("because of the way defenses are calculated"), which is an absolute lie. I've spent hundreds of hours damage testing various combinations of damage types to hell and back on Dark Souls 3 in particular, on Lothric Knights and Ringed City bosses, very specifically trying to figure out the optimal damage setups for my mage, and tumblebuffed fire resin and lightning resin will apply exactly the same damage increase for exactly the same numbers on a fire shortsword before elemental resistance disparities are applied.

See, here's the thing about Dark Souls 3 and damage calculations. Say you have a weapon that does like 100 damage on an R1 attack and 900 damage on a riposte. With a Crystal, Chaos, or whatever other elemental infusion, that can jump to like, 180 R1 and 2200 riposte or something.

If you apply a damage buff on top, whether from resin or from spell, that might bump the R1 to 150. The riposte also only goes up by the same flat damage amount, to 950. The split infusion scaling is so real that even Fire and Dark Daggers, with their zero stat scaling, do outright better ripostes than physical infusions on the same Daggers. Like, Fire infusion has been a pocket pvp meta pick for builds that don't have int and wis investment for the Chaos maximization and Dark Lothric Sword.

I've tried this like a billion different times on a billion different weapons. Weapon buffs conspicuously do not scale with any motion values ever in this game. Crystal infusion in particular is far and away the most optimal use of int investment for weapon damage, no exceptions, even on a longsword spamming R1's where you'd think applying a flat damage increase would be more optimal. Nah, the absolute disparity in stat and motion value scaling is just entirely too big.

I've also tried this like a billion different times with all four elements of buff. The same flat damage increase applies in the same way across all elements. The same scaling rules date all the way back to Dark Souls 1, where tumblebuffing reveals that the magic buff onto a magic weapon does not stack with the innate magic scaling at all, it's a completely separate hit split off as another instance of enemy defense applied all the same as when it's buffed onto a physical weapon.

(Fun fact, Crystal Magic Weapon and Lightning Blade apply the same multiplication from the catalyst spell buff. Dark Blade has the worst scaling, probably from being technically available at the almost-start of the game, and Carthus Flame Arc has far and away the best scaling probably to compensate from being usually confined to just one catalyst and not having access to Yorshka Chime or Court Sorcerer Staff-levels of spell buff.)

So in other words the real reason tumblebuffing fire resin is better than lightning for the Cursed Greatwood is because it's hitting his elemental weakness, not because it is unsplit damage at all. It's literally a goddamn three-way split, exactly the thing that makes people say Drakeblood Greatsword is sub-optimal in the same game. You're literally using the same damage type and split as the Drakeblood GS when you tumblebuff fire resin on a fire shortsword.

---

Incidentally the other conspicuous presence of a gigantic all-in-one motion value, that turns a Split Infusion into an Unsplit gigantic fat smash of elemental damage, is the biggest burst hits on giant weapons.

Ultra greatsword criticals are absolute ass in Dark Souls 3. Like I'm not talking about the crit modifier at all, a dagger or thrusting sword in any of these games with a 100 crit modifier is usually doing better riposte damage than other weapon classes with a 110 modifier. Giant weapon backstabs are just about the same damage as a basic R1 swing, making it feel like a waste of an opening to do the backstab and relegating the move to i-frame safety only.

There were three conspicuous hits on my souls 3 sorcerers that hit nearly identically the same giant one-shot number. Crystal Soul Spear off of a Court Sorcerer Staff, obviously; Crystal Dagger crits; and— Crystal Lothric Great Sword charged r2's! They seriously beefed up the motion value on that attack so high that it's one of the strongest burst hits in the history of this running ruleset.

Like, this is the reason it's important to pay deep attention to the moveset and motion value of the weapon, not just its AR on paper. Ripostes are supposed to be your giant damage opportunity and they're part of the Demon Greataxe one-shot against Gwyn in Dark Souls 1, but they're the ultra greatsword's singular worst attack in Dark Souls 3. Charged r2 is so gigantic that elemental infusions on ultra greatswords specifically outstrip anything physical infusions can do on the weapon class's best attack.

This absolutely carries over to Elden Ring, where charged and jump R2's are a colossal weapon's best friend and Lion's Claw is easily the best melee DPS on a generic ash-swappable big boy sword. The scaling rules have not changed any since Enchanted Great Scythes were doing 4-digit ripostes in Dark Souls 1, my Elden Ring mages have been doing absolutely cracked damage with the obvious moves on Magic Zweihanders.

To be continued because this rant is breaking the editor lol

#dark souls #elden ring #fromsoft #fromsoft games #rant post #build discussion #game discussion

5 notes · View notes

motorsportverso · 5 days ago

Text

Categorias e novidades do Endurance Gaucho 2025

A grande novidade será o “retorno” da categoria P1

Protótipos nacionais , AJR , Sigma G4,G5 , DTR01 com motores V8

O Protótipo XI aberto da MC Tubarão com motor Ford Duratec V6

Lola B08\60

O protótipo da Britânica Lola Cars , que chegou em 2017 ao Brasil , importado pela Crown Racing , poderá correr na categoria , protótipo feito para correr na extinta Rolex Sporcars Series na categoria DP (atual IMSA) com motor Ford V8 ou Pontiac V8.

Categoria para protótipos e GT

Categoria para protótipos Nacionais, SIGMA, AJR , com restrição, MRX, Ford GT “MC40” , Spyder , ABS01, Carros Fia GT3 acima de 2013, MCR Grand-AM, ABS01.

MC Tubarão XII, Spyder, Gee Bee R1\MC Tubarão, MCR

Spyder, MRX, Aldee e Stock Car com restritor

GT1

Carros GT, Fia GT3 até 2012, Fiat Linea Trofeu, Maceratti Trofeu , BMW 340, Fia GT3 acima de 2013.

GT2

Fiat Linea Trofeu, Audi A3 DTCC, Vettore

Categoria “GT” carros de turismo até 2.0

121-Jindra Kraucher\Aldo Piedade-Sigma G5-Tech Force

46-Mottin Racing-Metalmoro AJR

110-Ian Ely-DTR01-Overboost

121-Jindra Kraucher\Aldo Piedade-Sigma G5-Tech Force

63-Sergio e Guilherme Ribas-Mercedes-AMG GT3-Tech Force

25-Ney Faustiny-ABS01-Absoluta Racing

46-Mottin Racing-Metalmoro AJR

5-MC Tubarão\Gee Bee R1-MC Tubarão

77-Juarez\Edras\Esdras Suarez-MRX

43-Gustavo frey-Dallara Prototype

0-Aldee Coupe-RSports Team

0-Chevrolet Sonic Stock Car-RSports Team

GT1

81-Maceratti Trofeu-FTR Motorsport

GT2

0-Vettore

50-VW Gol Ford Duratec-MC Tubarão

777-Fiat Linea

#endurance rs #protótipos #gt3 #fia gt3 #lola cars

0 notes

acapulcopress · 4 months ago

Text

Siete capos mexicanos en la mira de EU

CIUDAD DE MÉXICO * 4 de diciembre, 2024 ) Infobae La7c, encabezada por Ken Salazar, compartió este 4 de diciembre una lista de siete narcotraficantes mexicanos por los que el Departamento de Estado ofrece una recompensa de millones de dólares. Aquí te informamos de quiénes se trata. A través de un comunicado titulado “Compromiso de Estados Unidos para debilitar a los cárteles transnacionales”, la sede diplomática con sede en la Ciudad de México informó este miércoles que actualmente existen al menos 30 compensaciones dentro del Programa de Recompensas contra los Narcóticos (NRP, por sus siglas en inglés) por líderes de cárteles de drogas. En la lista se incluye capos cuya ubicación permanece desconocida y también nombres de criminales que están a la espera de su extradición, como es el caso de los líderes de Los Zetas, los hermanos Miguel Ángel (’El Z-40′) y Óscar Omar (’Z-42′) Treviño Morales; quienes se encuentran detenidos desde el 2013 y 2015 ―respectivamente― y no han sido entregados a Estados Unidos. Destaca que, en total, el NRP ha ofrecido 142 millones de dólares por información que conduzca al arresto y/o condena de narcotraficantes mexicanos. Entre los nombres se encuentran: * Rafael Caro Quintero, cofundador del Cártel de Guadalajara ‘El Narco de Narcos’, como también es conocido, actualmente se encuentra recluido en el Centro Federal de Readaptación Social (Cefereso) No. 1, ‘El Altiplano’. Es requerido por Estados Unidos por la tortura y el asesinato de Enrique ‘Kiki’ Camarena, agente de la Administración de Control de Drogas (DEA). Se trata del capo mexicano por el que el vecino norte ha ofrecido más dinero: 20 millones de dólares. * Los hermanos Guzmán Salazar, líderes de Los Chapitos Se trata de Iván Archivaldo y Jesús Alfredo Guzmán Salazar, hijos del primer matrimonio de Joaquín ‘El Chapo’ Guzmán a quienes se les señala de ser los líderes de Los Chapitos. Por cada uno de ellos se ofrecen 10 millones de dólares. * Aureliano Guzmán Loera, alias ‘El Guano’ El hermano de ‘El Chapo’ Guzmán, identificado como líder de la facción ‘Los Guanos’ del Cártel de Sinaloa, también es buscado por EEUU. Se ofrece una gratificación de 5 millones de dólares por él. * Ruperto Salgueiro Nevárez, ‘El Batman’ Hombre de 46 años de edad identificado por Estados Unidos como socio de los hermanos Guzmán Loera y del Cártel de Sinaloa. Es acusado de distribuir marihuana, heroína, cocaína y metanfetamina, por lo que ofrecen 5 millones de dólares por información sobre él. * Jesús González Peñuelas, ‘El Chuy’ Líder de una organización criminal independiente que se dedica a la producción y distribución de metanfetamina, marihuana y heroína desde 2007, según el Departamento de Estado. También se ofrecen 5 millones de dólares por él. * Juan Reyes Mejía González, ‘El R1′ El presunto líder de Los Rojos, del Cártel del Golfo, es acusado de facilitar los envíos de drogas entre las fuentes de suministro de cocaína de América Central y del Sur y las operaciones de transbordo en Nuevo Laredo y Reynosa, Tamaulipas. Su recompensa es de 5 millones de dólares. * Aumentan recompensa de ‘El Mencho’ La información de la sede diplomática estadounidense se dio a conocer pocas horas después de que el Departamento de Estado informó un aumento en la recompensa que se ofrece por Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, líder del Cártel Jalisco Nueva Generación (CJNG). Se trata de un incremento de 5 millones de dólares, por lo que el vecino norte ofrece ahora 15 millones de dólares por ‘El Mencho’; poco más 300 millones de pesos mexicanos, de acuerdo con el tipo de cambio actual. “Estamos comprometidos con desarticular a las organizaciones criminales transnacionales para proteger la salud, la seguridad y el bienestar de las personas. Este tipo de acciones nos permiten avanzar en nuestra seguridad compartida”, concluyó la Embajada de Estados Unidos. ) www.acapulcopress.com Read the full article

#https://www.infobae.com/mexico/2024/12/04/no-solo-el-mencho-embajada-de-eeuu-en-mexico-revela-quienes-son-los-otros-narcos-mexicanos-por-lo #KenSalazar #ProgramadeRecompensascontralosNarcóticos(NRP)

0 notes

otrstore · 9 months ago

Text

Radiator/ Water Tank For Yamaha Fazer1000/ FZ1S/ FZ1N/ FZ1000 2006-2012 Fazer 800/ FZ8 2011-2013 Radiator/ Water Tank For Yamaha Fazer1000/ FZ1S/ FZ1N/ FZ1000 2006-2012 Fazer 800/ FZ8 2011-2013. Oem Design And Shape. Made From High Quality Aluminium That Can Sustain High Temprature. Also Have High Quality Fins For Air Inflow. Direct Fitment

Yamaha R15 fuel pump motor Yamaha R15 fuel motor Yamaha R15 petrol motor Yamaha R15 V1 fuel pump motor Yamaha R15 V1 fuel motor Yamaha R15 V1 motor Yamaha R15 V1 petrol motor Yamaha R15 V2 fuel pump motor Yamaha R15 V2 fuel motor Yamaha R15 V2 petrol motor Yamaha R15 V1 Fuel Pump Assembly Yamaha R15 V1 Fuel Pump unit Yamaha R15 V1 Fuel Pump Yamaha R15 V2 Fuel Pump Assembly Yamaha R15 V2 Fuel Pump unit Yamaha R15 V2 Fuel Pump Yamaha R15 spare parts and accessories Yamaha R15 V1 spare parts and accessories Yamaha R15 V2 spare parts and accessories Yamaha R15 V3 spare parts and accessories Yamaha R15 VERSION 3 spare parts and accessories Yamaha R3 spare parts and accessories Yamaha R6 spare parts and accessories Yamaha R7 spare parts and accessories Yamaha R1 spare parts and accessories Yamaha FZ1 spare parts and accessories Yamaha FZS spare parts and accessories Yamaha FZ16 spare parts and accessories Yamaha FZ25 spare parts and accessories Yamaha FZ6 spare parts and accessories Yamaha FZ8 spare parts and accessories Yamaha FZ1 spare parts and accessories Yamaha Fazer spare parts and accessories Yamaha fazer 25 spare parts and accessories Yamaha Majesty spare parts and accessories Yamaha MT 01 spare parts and accessories Yamaha MT-03 spare parts and accessories Yamaha MT-06 spare parts and accessories Yamaha MT-07 spare parts and accessories Yamaha MT-08 spare parts and accessories Yamaha MT-09 spare parts and accessories

0 notes

mysgprop-cstee · 10 months ago

Text

【富力公主湾】R&F Princess Cove at Tg. Puteri, Johor

R&F PRINCESS COVE @ JB

Last Tower of Phase 2 (Completed) is open for Sales! Type R1 Sea View Studio * 外国人可购买 𝐅𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐞𝐫 𝐄𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐮𝐲 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐯𝐞 𝐑𝐌𝟓𝟎𝟎𝐤 * (R&F Princess Cove Phase 2 - Seine Region) - Sea View Studio - 544 sq.ft (TYPE R1) - Freehold 永久地契现金买家 Cash Buyer Price from RM 7xx,xxx 贷款买家 Loan Buyer Price from RM 8xx,xxx * 免买卖合同律师费 𝐅𝐑𝐄𝐄 𝐒𝐏𝐀 𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐋 𝐅𝐄𝐄 * 免按揭合同律师费 𝐅𝐑𝐄𝐄 𝐋𝐎𝐀𝐍 𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐋 𝐅𝐄𝐄 * 免外国人购置税 𝐅𝐑𝐄𝐄 𝐅𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐈𝐆𝐍𝐄𝐑 𝐋𝐄𝐕𝐘 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐒𝐄𝐍𝐓 * 赠送1个车位 𝐅𝐑𝐄𝐄 𝟏 𝐂𝐀𝐑𝐏𝐀𝐑𝐊 𝐋𝐎𝐓 * 赠送部分家私 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐅𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐝 Enquiry Now

R&F Princess Cove at Tanjung Puteri, Johor CBD, Iskandar Zone A

The Gateway to Singapore/ Iskandar Malaysia

Introduction

Type DescriptionsProject Name R&F Princess Cove 富力公主湾 Developer Name Guangzhou R&F Properties Co Ltd 富力地产LocationTanjung Puteri, Johor Bahru City Center (CBD)Tenure of LandFreeHold Commercial titleExpected Date of Completion (T.O.P.) Stages. Phase 1 & 2 completed.Site area 116 acres approximateTotal No. of UnitsPhase I: 7 Towers of 35 storey, a total of 3,224 Units consist of`1-4 bedroom, 3 bedrooms & Dual key Car Park Lots 4 Basement Carpark Level

Developer by Hong Kong based R&F Properties Co Ltd, R&F Princess Cove is set to be a new landmark property development in Tanjung Puteri, Johor Bahru CBD. The phase one of R&F Princess Cove will consists 3,000+ of luxury apartments in 15 blocks. On top of this, the phase-1 of R&F Princess Cove will also house a shopping mall, a five-star hotel and an office tower. The development would be divided into four phases. The phase-1 is expected to be completed 2018, align with the expected completion of Singapore-Johor RTS Station. R&F Princess Cove sitting on the 116 acres of land, 3 times the site of Country Garden at Danga Bay. The land was bought at RM4.5bil in a deal involving the Johor Royalty in late last year (2013). This translated into RM890 psf (per sq ft), which is the second most highly priced land in Johor Bahru, trailing closely behind another China-based firm that had bought 37 acres of land in Danga Bay for RM991 per sq ft. However, you can now enjoy the early birds price at RM1100 averagely, simply express your interest now! About Developer's Background

Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd. 富力地产 is one of the tycoon property developers in China, listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange. With over 20 years of experience in property development, the company make its name with its iconic developments mostly the classical bungalows, grade-A office towers and five-star hotels. The developments are mostly in China with Malaysia as its first foreign project - R&F Princess Cove. The Company’s principal activity is the development of high quality of residential and commercial properties. The Company had developed numerous hotels, office buildings and shopping malls in Beijing, Guangzhou, and other cities, which are held as investment properties. As of time of writing, the company had developed over 100 projects, including Tianjin Guandong Building (Top-10 the tallest buildings in China) and 14 International 5-star Hotels, incorporated with InterContinental Hotels Group, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel, Marriott International, & Hyatt Hotels.

Project Highlights Why R&F Princess Cove at Tanjung Puteri? - Close Proximity to CIQ , Johor Bahru - FREEHOLD at prime location of Johor CBD (Zone A of Iskandar Malaysia) - Close proximity to established eateries and amenities - Easy access to major roads and expressways, such as EDL, Costal Highway, Tebrau Expressway, Senai Expressway, & North-South Highway - Stone Throw to Proposed MRT/ RTS Station at Tanjung Puteri - Affordable Pricing from RM800 psf - Mega Project in Johor Location Map R&F Princess Cove is strategically located at the both side of the SG-JB Causeway bridge, being part of the Tanjung Puteri Waterfront Developments.

1 minute Causeway/Singapore (Woodlands), CIQ (via Eastern Dispersal Link), Johor Bahru CBD 8 minutes Southkey Megamall, Aeon Permas Jaya, Renaissance Hotel, Permas Golf & Country Club, Real International School, Banks(CIMB, PB, RHB, Hong Leong) 15 minutes City of Knowledge (Bandar Seri Alam), Giant Plentong, Ponderosa Golf & Country Club, Regency Specialist Hospital, Tesco Extra. Singapore CBD, Puteri Harbour Family Theme Park, LEGOLAND EduCity/MEDINI, Senai International Airport. Site/Floor Plan

Phase 1 (A1, A2, A3 & A7) Site Plan

Phase 2 (A4, A5 & A6) Site Plan

Facilities: - Garden clubhouse - Greenery Square - Swimming Pool - Feature Wall - Sea View Ox Bar - VIP Waiting Room - Children’s Playground - Gymnasium - Pool Room - Indoor Ox Bar - Grand Entrance - Gazebo Floor Plan: Phase 2 Floor Plan

Phase 1 Floor Plan

Unit Mixes Apartment TypeSizeStudio43.6sqm (469 sqft)2 bdrm 73.8sqm (794sqft), 81sqm (872 sqft), 81.2sqm(874sqft)2 bdrm + study99.9sqm (1075sqft) and 102sqm (1098sqft)3 bdrm97.8sqm (1052sqft) , 98.7sqm(1062sqft) , 100.3sqm (1079), 100.2sqm(1078) ,105.3sqm (1133sqft) ,105.4sqm(1242sqft)4bdrm129.3sqm(1391sqft)Dual key124.8sqm (1343sqft) Price Guide/ Sales Package ⭐PRICE GUIDE⭐ Please Contact Us at +65.84188689 It is important to only engage the Official Direct Developer Sales Team to assist you to enjoy the best possible direct developer price. There is no commission required to be paid. Interior Design/ Gallery With adhere to R&F’s TOP series quality of creation, R&F Princess Cove has launched the most luxurious sales gallery in Johor Bahru.

R&F_Princess_Cove_Iskandar_Malaysia

R&F_Princess_Cove_TopView2

R&F_Princess_Cove_TopView

R&F_Princess_Cove_night_view

R&F_Princess_Cove_sky_pool

R&F_Princess_Cove_showgallery

R&F_Princess_Cove_beach2

R&F_Princess_Cove_beach

Download E-Brochures OFFICIAL BROCHURES/ Floor Plan e-brochure / floor plan Contact/ Register Your Interest

Read the full article

0 notes

perioddramapolls · 1 year ago

Text

Period dramas dresses tournament: Grey/Silver dresses Round 1- Group D: Juliet Capulet, Romeo and Juliet (pics set) vs Swanhilda, Coppelia

#period drama dresses tournament #tournament poll #tumblr tournament #polls #fashion poll #juliet capulet #romeo and juliet #romeo and juliet 2013 #swanhilda #coppelia #coppelia royal ballet #gs r1

22 notes · View notes

govindhtech · 11 months ago

Text

Rabbit R1: Introducing a Unique AI Handheld Device Today

Rabbit R1

Do you recall the Facebook phone? Allow me to jog your memories. The Facebook phone was a portable gadget designed mainly for Facebook use. Sounds strange, don’t you think? Facebook thought this was a brilliant idea back in 2013. Still, many found themselves asking themselves why they should spend money on this gear when they could use their regular phone to access the Facebook programme. It goes without saying that the Facebook phone was a complete failure.

The Fire phone from Amazon was a similar flop. Its main goal was to persuade consumers to make more Amazon purchases. The failure of both gadgets stemmed from their inability to provide a basic response to the question, “What problem does this device solve “After considering these two cases, you may marvel how Facebook and Amazon’s smart people introduced such fantastical products.

They ought to have known better than to believe that these devices bring the consumer any extra benefit at all. Unbelievably, these kinds of mistakes occur more frequently than you may imagine. There is a long record of unsuccessful products in the computer industry, some of which defy common reason, because of its “move fast and break things” mentality.

Draw comparisons between the Rabbit R1 and the Facebook and Fire phones as listen to the buzz about it in IT circles. From a user experience perspective, It’s history is about to repeat itself and Rabbit R1 will soon be inducted into the hall of fame of technological calamities. AI experts and computer geeks will kill me for stating this. Rabbit R1 or at least what I believe it to be as simply as I can for any of you who haven’t heard of it before that will happen.

What is the Rabbit R1 ?

The Rabbit R1 is a portable generative AI gadget that resembles a phone in both size and form. It features a tiny touch screen and a button that must be pressed in order to speak commands to the gadget. Like ChatGPT, it can deliver answers to inquiries, but if you connect R1 to the many services you use on your phone, it can also perform other functions like ordering takeaway, booking a cab and playing music. That’s essentially it. Let’s now do a UX sanity check and peel back the layers of clever technology and elegant copy liberally laced with generative AI jargon.

The Rabbit R1 is a unique AI device powered by Rabbit OS, designed to simplify and enhance your digital interactions by using a Large Action Model (LAM). This allows the device to perform complex tasks across various apps without needing multiple integrations

Rabbit R1 Phone

The founder of Rabbit R1 makes an effort to explain the issue they are attempting to resolve. He claims: “People have too many apps on their phones, and it’s difficult and perplexing to go through them all. Thus, we need to stop using apps. True, most consumers own a large number of apps on their phones, but only 20% of those apps are used 80% of the time. More significantly, people have no trouble using these 20% of programmes. The majority of well-known apps offer a simple and straightforward user experience by significantly streamlining their user interface.

Tapping a few times to order food, hire a cab, or play music is easy for users. Additionally, the majority of individuals have become so accustomed to using their phones for these regular duties that navigating these app interfaces is second nature to them. Given this, why is the Rabbit R1 attempting to tackle a problem that doesn’t even exist?

Why should you talk when you can tap the screen, even if you were persuaded of the benefits of doing everything from one location rather than using several apps? A discrete and effective way to engage is to tap on a screen. Conversely, voice instructions require vocalisation, which in some situations can be bothersome and inconvenient. For the majority of people, it will be much easier to tap on a screen than to speak commands out loud.

Rabbit R1 AI Device

The R1 is intended to be used in conjunction with smartphones rather than as a substitute for them. But what’s the compelling reason, given that most people are already hooked to their phones, to carry about an extra AI device in my pocket? Being an app rather than a piece of hardware would have been far preferable for R1.

Their Large Action Model (LAM) exhibits great promise and appears to be a more effective generation AI tool than ChatGPT and similar apps, particularly when it comes to action capabilities. Rather of trying to manage the challenges of hardware manufacture, Rabbit might have, Concentrated on improving the software user experience and reaching a wider audience. That R1’s hardware venture is more of a publicity gimmick than a calculated move.

In conclusion, You believe that Rabbit R1 will serve as a warning about the dangers of valuing novelty over functionality in technology. While voice-activated AI tools like Jarvis in Iron Man have an undeniable appeal, their viability depends on meeting real user demands and blending in with current ecosystems. Finally, improving users’ lives with simple and useful solutions is the real test of success not creating buzz.