#1/76.2 scale | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

ruby-whistler · 3 years ago

Text

The "redemption questionnaire" - the survey results.

Hello! Welcome back to the results of this survey, which is now closed - I really didn’t expect this amount of interest and am thankful for the ability to collect this much data on the subject.

Now, the reason I made this survey in the first place was this post crossing my dash. It talks about people wanting to see characters or people who they dislike suffer, even if healing is completely possible or even the better option - it’s about people denying that there is such a thing as bad people “deserving” things that we humans need to function, such as being loved.

This post talks about fictional characters, but despite that fact, it made me lose my faith in humanity just a bit. I am a pretty cynical person, but I also consider myself quite empathetic to existing and fictional people alike.

So, I got curious, and wondered - in the Dream SMP fandom specifically, is there a way to get input as to what people actually think about the issue of redemption?

[ tw for brief mentions of torture and abuse ]

So, the goal of the survey was get information to answer certain questions;

Do people think that some characters shouldn’t be redeemed or are irredeemable because of their actions, however don’t hold this true for others?

Are there people, who despite disliking certain characters, still believe that they deserve healing?

Would people want characters to suffer or even die for their actions rather than heal and be happy?

Do people think certain characters in the story don’t deserve to be happy?

Now, I did get some responses that were asking to include or exclude certain characters from the main three (Quackity, Dream and Wilbur - all names are talking about the characters only), however there was a very specific reason I chose these people.

Quackity and Dream have both done actions that have similar weight, while Wilbur serves as an outlier; someone who hurt people in more indirect, but still impactful ways. All three of them have been hurt - Wilbur mostly by Eret’s betrayal, Quackity by Schlatt and others, and Dream by Sam and Quackity. All three have contributed to a toxic and harmful environment, which in turn hurt them back even more and drove them deeper into becoming destructive.

Such a comparison between them would test the fandom’s ability to separate their feelings from in-story morality, as well as bring double standards to light.

Let’s see the demographic part of the survey first, as to see what we are working with;

Of the 390 people partaking in the survey, 44.9% like the direction the Dream SMP plot is heading at the moment, 3% do not and 52.1% are not sure.

Of the characters whose redemption arcs are most anticipated, 71% of participants are expecting a BadBoyHalo or Eggpire redemption arc, Niki/Jack and Wilbur coming close in second and third with 59.2% and 51.8% respectively. As for the main trio of this survey, Quackity lands with 28.2%, Dream with 43.3% and Wilbur with 51.8% of participants thinking a redemption arc for them is likely in the near future.

I would like to express right now that the characters included in the “possible redemption” section do not in any way, shape or form reflect on what I personally think about the characters. I don’t think certain characters need a redemption arc, however I left in the option in order to let people pick it if they wish to do so.

As for the healing arc question, quite understandably, Tommy and Tubbo are the characters most expected to get a healing arc in the upcoming storylines, sitting at 76.2% of participants. Niki and/or Jack come in second with 62.1%, and Quackity, Wilbur and Dream land at 25.4%, 45.9% and 42.8% respectively.

For the aforementioned questions, 3.6% or participants thought none of the Dream SMP characters would get a redemption arc, and 5.4% thought none of them would heal - and with the track record the story has so far, I honestly cannot blame them.

Now we move more towards the main trio;

48.7% of participants have positive feelings towards Quackity’s character, and 23.1% have negative ones. The majority of the participants (66.2%) think that his actions are intentional and hurtful, but interestingly enough, only 25.4% say they find them inexcusable and awful.

For c!Dream, 51.5% feel positively towards him and 35.7% do negatively. Luckily, 53.8% find his actions inexcusable and awful, while 40.3% find them intentional and hurtful.

c!Wilbur breaks the trend with 58.7% of people feeling positively towards the character and only 17.2% feeling negatively, however such a discrepancy can be expected when we compare his actions (found 65.1% of the time to be intentional and hurtful).

I want to preface this next section by saying that I have nothing against people who find redemption arcs unappealing, or wouldn’t find them narratively appealing in the specific story. These answers will be counted as merely neutral ground in the upcoming questions; you are completely valid if you think certain character arcs would not fit the themes or style of storytelling, or if you want bad people to stay bad for the sake of conflict.

However, 79.5% of people find well-done redemption and healing very appealing within the story, and 19% like it for certain stories and characters, so this shouldn’t impact the results on a large scale.

1. Do people think that some characters shouldn’t be redeemed or are irredeemable because of their actions, however don’t hold this true for others?

People’s reasoning for not wanting characters to heal varies, however the contrast between c!Quackity and c!Dream in this scenario is very intriguing.

Despite the two having done comparably disgusting things, one with more and one with less selfish reasons but neither excusable, both classifying under abuse, the people who think c!Dream shouldn’t get a redemption arc (9.7%) because of his actions greatly overshadow the people who think c!Quackity doesn’t deserve a redemption arc (1%) because of his actions. Hell, even c!Wilbur’s percentage is higher, sitting at 2.1%.

This is extremely surprising considering the demographic - and seems to hint at the fact that people who think positively of c!Dream are far more likely to think that c!Q and c!Wil deserve redemption and healing (despite the common argument that both have hurt him greatly) than it is the other way around.

Even sending a bad message is a lot higher with c!Dream (30.5%), despite the fact that c!Quackity’s actions and him as a character could be similarly triggering, and he himself sits at 2.6% of participants. Of course, this question could be partially taken as what he went through in prison making him better, which would definitely be a bad message to send, but considering the percentage (42.1%) of people who don’t want Dream to be redeemed, that’s still insanely high.

Overall, people from a very balanced demographic of people who are positive and negative towards the three characters, only 52.6% want Dream redeemed as opposed to the 83.8% with Quackity and 86.7% with Wilbur - and the reasons given seem to be largely based on bias and double standard, or even hypocritical in context.

For the fandom, this question’s answer seems to be yes, although from the people who are c!Dream positive, this sort of thinking seems to be of a much lesser extent and amount towards characters they dislike.

2. Are there people, who despite disliking certain characters, still believe that they deserve healing?

Let’s look at some of the comments given to this answer;

“On the one hand I do want Dream to recognize that his actions have hurt people, but I really don’t want torture to have ‘made him better’ or for the people he hurt to have to forgive him.”

“as much as I hate c!quackity and dislike c!wilbur, I believe that evil is not something you are, its what you do and as such I think every person deserves to heal and grow.”

“Quackity is the closest - he's spiraled far, but we got to see some of what he could be as a more moral man. Dream's arc would be....incredibly difficult to pull off, and while everyone deserves a chance to change, not everyone who does is ever owed forgiveness. And Wilbur....I dont know what would make him want to get better, but I want him to.”

“I wouldn’t like some of these characters to get redeemed(c!Quackity), but I know everyone deserves a chance at redemption because no one is mentally stable and not traumatized.”

“bastard men. on a serious note ive noticed a lot of evil in dsmp come from the perpetuation of the cycle of revenge and punitive punishment and i think excluding someone from them would. just not be a good message. and yeah c!dreams motives and methods being seen in separate characters is just proof of this - nothing that made any of these men villains are unique to them, and they are all shit-infested holes other characters can fall in.”

“i think every character on the smp has done horrible things and is morally grey, but i think everyone deserves the chance and the ability to heal and try to be better.”

“listen, i love big q, and i know he doesn't mean it, Wilbur also deserves better (far from tommy tho, they're not good for each other rn) and dream can go f**k himself, the only "healing " Arc that would ever make sense is if he escapes the prison and f**ks off to the middle of nowhere (wich is unlikely)”

“Even if I don't like some of the characters they deserve a chance at healing and moving on”

“Controversial opinion but Wilbur has been pretty shady from the start, so a redemption/healing arc just wouldn't make sense to me. He antagonized Dream to sell drugs.”

“i would like to qualify all my answers towards redemption as that they are /all/ allowed to get better, just not necessarily near those they've hurt. those they've hurt are under no obligation to forgive them or be involved in that.”

“REDEMPTION IS POG F**K IT EVERYONE GETS REDEEMED THE ONLY BIG BAD THAT EXISTS IS SYSTEMIC”

“Clarifying about my wilbur answers. A character can only get a redemption if he wants to change. Wilbur doesn’t want to change. I still think he deserves to heal but not to be redeemed. Those are two very seperate things”

“PLEASE JUST LET THEM GET HELP. ALL OF THEM.”

“i'm at sort of an impasse with c!quackity & c!wilbur. i don't like c!quackity in the slightest. i think he has great potential for a redemption arc, but i probably wouldn't be interested in watching it. on the other hand, with c!wilbur, i actually would watch his redemption arc, but i don't see it happening any time soon.”

“I answered " he deserves to heal and get better despite the actions he's commited; everyone deserves to heal and get better " for c!Wilbur but I partially Disagree with the "Everyone deserves to heal and get better" part. simply because some characters are irredeamable eg : c!dream”

“If c!Wilbur gets a redemption arc (I hope he does) I really hope it comes with learning that ethnostates and nationalism are not poggers. I'd be worried about the message it would send if he didn't learn that & it only focused on interpersonal stuff instead.”

“maybe a bit weird that i want c!dream to have a redemption arc but not c!q or c!wilbur, but hear me out. c!dream is being tortured in pandoras vault and we all know (no matter what the c!dream antis say) no one deserves torture. we have something to sympathize with with c!dream. with c!q and c!wilbur, i cant think of anything to sympathize with …. im not trying to say that c!dream is better than them, or that he didnt do bad things, but i sympathize with him much more than i do with c!q and c!wilbur because q and wilbur caused their own problems while a lot of dreams problems come from other people”

“We have both seen Wilbur and Quackity be relatively good people, or at the very least morally Gray people who had genuine love and care to those close to them. While with Dream we have never seen that, as he has always been focused on chaos, fun, and power.”

“I just want everyone to be happy and get along. C!Wilbur to get his problems fixed. C!Quackity to be happy and not have to worry about being the next c!Schlatt. C!Dream to finally tell us his side of the story and potentially join the syndicate?”

“Redemption isnt something any one can say is deserved or not”

“For me the main difference is thay wilbur and quackity (although having done bad things) did them out of grief or bc they felt like it was the only thing they could do for a sense of security (both after they lost something important to them). Dream on the other hand went out of his way and hurt others maliciously when he DIDNT have to or there were other less horrible/long-lasting actions he could done”

“The message that some people dont deserve to learn and grow from their past mistakes is harmful”

“listen.. i really hate c!quackity and c!wilbur right now so.. erm..in emotionally, i don't want them to have redemption arc because i hate them..BUT by using my brain i know that is a stupid excuse, everyone deserve redemption so..yeah sorry if it confusing you but honestly..the reason i hate them so much is probably because of the arc they on so..give them time and i think i will say i welcome their redemption arc with an open arm”

“i answered twice for dream because i have mixed feelings, while i think he is an atrocious person, i believe personally that forgoing forgiveness from others, he deserves to be happy and healthy and heal. hes clearly got issues of his own, and while it doesnt excuse his actions he also deserves the basic right to heal”

“I personally regard redemption as the act of simply becoming a better person, seperate from whether or not they are accepted or forgiven by their victims. With that definition, I think there is no being "deserving" of a redemption arc, it's something that everyone is entitled to if they chose to. Therefore, everyone, and I mean everyone, in as something as morally gray as the Dream SMP is capable of becoming a better person. It doesn't mean they get rewarded or forgiven for it, it just means they are capable of change and are able to fulfil character potential beyond being a villain.”

It seems to me like there definitely are a lot of people in each side of the spectrum, so this test seems to have come back positive; however, there are more questions that we have yet to answer.

3. Would people want characters to suffer or even die for their actions rather than heal and be happy?

Here is probably a good place to mention this questionnaire was more of a psychological experiment than a survey. Most of the answers were specifically designed and in such an order that would get your mind thinking about certain things before shoving your psyche into a difficult question.

Well, here comes the moment of truth; what sort of redemption arc do people prefer? Would they rather the character get better and reap the “rewards” (which are actually simply things every human being needs and deserves; love and happiness), atone for their actions but not get to be happy, or would they like them to suffer or be punished instead? Do people really treat basic human needs as “rewards” for being a good person; or are they only reserved for characters that were never bad people in the first place? Remember; all of these characters have inarguably gone through pain during their life. Just how much do people enjoy punitive justice, and should I literally just stick to my corner of the fandom for my own good?

The answer probably won’t surprise you!

Starting off, 82.8% want a happy or neutral ending for Quackity, 59.4% of which think he should experience good things in the end. 54.4% of participants want a happy or neutral ending for Dream, 62.7% of which think it should lead to him being happy and loved. 89.2% of people want a happy or neutral ending for Wilbur, 49.4% of which lean towards happiness over closure.

17.2% of participants would prefer Quackity to experience pain as part of his redemption arc. 8.5% want him to be mentally tormented by the weight of his own actions, and 5.6% think he should be punished before being allowed to get better.

For Dream, these percentages are way higher- and here is the funny thing, I thought that pretty much no one would say he should suffer before healing, because he’s already suffering for his actions indirectly by being abused by people who hate him for them. However, 7.2% of people think he has yet to be punished enough for his crimes in order to deserve being redeemed. 21.5% want him to suffer under the weight of his own actions, and 6.9% would want him to die instead of getting a happy ending. Overall, 45.6% would prefer a redemption arc for Dream in which he is subjected to pain or punishment.

10.8% of participants would want Wilbur to have a more difficult character arc, with the percentages pretty evenly divided between the options.

4. Do people think certain characters in the story don’t deserve to be happy?

“Deserving” basic human needs, or not deserving them for being bad people/being bad people in the past, is something I don’t personally agree with, however this is tumblr, not thought police, so let’s just look at the survey results.

While 68.5% of participants believe all of the characters in the story deserve to be loved and happy, only 66.2% think Wilbur does, 61.5% think Quackity does, and 38.5% think Dream does.

Let’s look at some closing thoughts on the subject as a closing note;

“I want everyone to have a sort of personal redemption. Where they realize they have hurt people. But I think it’s difficult. I mean Dream abused a child. Quackity tortured Dream relentlessly. I think the redemption arc that is the easiest is one for Wilbur because of cc!wilburs acting and emphasis on his characters mental health. But I think Wilburs also done so much f**ked up shit too. I think it’s difficult. I just think the redemption arcs are really really difficult.”

“i genuinely can't help myself, i want everyone to have the chance to be better.”

“i think that wilbur, quackity and sam should be redeemed because we as an audience know that they all believe they're doing the right thing and regret/didn't enjoy hurting people with their actions. but with c!dream, there's a lot more evidence that he knew what he was doing wrong and actively enjoyed doing it.”

“everybody deserves to heal. if someone wants to be better and strives to be better, who is anyone to deprive them of that?”

“I don’t like some of these characters and their actions, but everyone deserves a chance to heal. To work through their trauma.”

“dream doesn’t deserve shit, quackitys probably gonna keep riding the las nevadas train until it crashes and burns and wilbur should move on from being “the villain” and stop seeing everything as black and white”

“No one is beyond deserving help. That's not how the world works and that's not what the story should show in my opinion.”

“narratively, i want redemption and happy endings for all characters but morally, i really despise some of them and i'm also really conflicted about some of them as well”

“I want my faves to be better and I think it's the best possible option for everyone involved, even the characters they've hurt.”

“c!wilbur and c!quackity go to therapy. c!dream get hit by another train /hj”

“Hurt people hurt people. If given a chance to distance yourself from your victims and abusers, if given a safe environment with a support network of people you haven't formerly harmed, you can then heal and let the others heal. Live and let live, but living is harder for everyone when we don't give others the chances they need to grow and change themselves.”

“all of them deserve to find growth and happiness but under no circumstances are those who have been hurt by them obligated to be involved in any aspect of that arc. most obvious example- c!dream is allowed to grow and realize that what he's done is awful, but c!tommy is not obligated to forgive him or even be near him.”

“They can all improve and get better and be better people …. They all deserve a chance to be better and be happy. However. Wilbur and dream should get their "redemption" arcs away from esp. Tommy and all the other people they hurt. Big Q. should get his redemption arc away from Dream and stuff. If the prison was less focused on detainment and more focused on rehabilitation and then Dream had no contact with Tommy for example that's a scenario that I'd like.”

“is quackity actually considered a villain in this story? What has he done wrong lol Create a casino? be emotionally manipulated? have rejection sensitive dysphoria? I don't think he's a good person based on his current actions but i don't think hes a villain. I think he's trying hard to become something hes not. … I hate c!dream and I don't think he can ever get better. hes a manipulator gaslight gatekeep girlboss and i think he deserves to stay in prison and rot. watching the tommy exile arc would make me so angry that i had to stop watching.”

“i'm so CONFLICTED about this! i want the angst, but god the angst has been going on for a LONG time. honestly, i think the conclusion i would be happiest with would be for c!dream, c!quackity, c!sam, c!tommy, and c!wilbur to calm down, get some therapy, and stay VERY FAR AWAY FROM EACH OTHER. god damn, it's like they WANT to get more traumatized,,”

“the loathing i feel directed at c!dream specifically is so goddamn strong. my god i hate that guy. uhhh regarding quackity no i dont feel like he shouldnt feel ANY pain or anything hes done some f**ked up stuff but i mean..? with the exception of the torture hes the most redeemable guy up there for me which is probably because we have seen his entire downward spiral.”

“I have to admit that although I strongly believe no one on the Dream SMP deserves to be tormented and deprived of their healing and happiness, I feel really icky about c!Quackity. I really hope that the ccs find a way to make his redemption logical and satisfying to watch. If that is not the case, I will still welcome it with open arms, but secretly I will be a little bit salty about it.”

“For the last question bit there i wanted to check more then once because i want them all to feel guilty and tormented for what they have done.”

“Yknow.... basic human rights... to be happy and loved isn't something that should be deserved it should be something that everyone is allowed to obtain for themselves and it shouldn't be allowed it should just be…”

“While i think that all of the characters should the chance to get redemption and healing, I’d probably be less likely to watch redemption arcs from c!Quackity and c!Wilbur than c!Dream, just because I dislike them. Not to say that they shouldn’t get them, because I hope they do, I’m just more like to be going “Good for them” in the distance.”

“I JUST WANT THEM ALL TO BE HAPPY PLEASEEEEEEEE -dr3”

“for the final question it doesnt provide a none of the above option or a some of the characters but not all option. since I dont think c!Dream deserves to be happy and loved but I do the other two (to some degree) but answering "all of the characters .. " I feel Includes c!dream who I ultimately just really hate and want to have nothing but a fictional death!”

“therapy. therapy for everyone.”

“f**k c!dream <3 i honestly don’t think people who abuse kids (or anyone) for fun should ever be redeemed i think they should just rot in a hole somewhere”

“It would be hypocritical to say that one character deserves redemption more than another, especially considering they've all done (almost equally) horrible things. Either everyone deserves redemption, or no one does.”

Conclusion: in the end, this is all the ways in which we like to enjoy fiction. However, for some completely unrelated reason, I am now about 45.6% less likely to attempt to interact with anyone outside my immediate group of friends in the fandom.

Thank you for reading!

#dream smp #dsmp fandom critical #tw abuse ment #tw torture ment

134 notes · View notes

cma-european-art · 3 years ago

Photo

The Kiss of Peace and Justice, Laurent de La Hyre , 1654, Cleveland Museum of Art: European Painting and Sculpture

The figures of Peace (burning the weapons of war) and Justice (holding a sword and scales) embrace in a quiet landscape. The Latin inscription under the antique urn reads “Justice and Peace kissed” (referring to an Old Testament verse, Psalms 85:11). The subject may have had political significance: the painting’s date coincides with the end of the Fronde, a period of civil war in France during which the parlement (courts of appeal) and the nobility sought—unsuccessfully—to limit the power of the monarchy Size: Framed: 68.5 x 89 x 6.5 cm (26 15/16 x 35 1/16 x 2 9/16 in.); Unframed: 54.9 x 76.2 cm (21 5/8 x 30 in.) Medium: oil on canvas

https://clevelandart.org/art/1971.102

#museumarchive #cmaopenaccess #clevelandartmuseum #europeanart

13 notes · View notes

gagosiangallery · 3 years ago

Text

Sarah Sze at Gagosian Basel and Art Basel Parcours

September 1, 2021

SARAH SZE New Works

September 20–November 13, 2021 Rheinsprung 1, Basel Timepiece (2021), Art Basel Parcours September 20–26, 2021, 7pm–1am daily Rheinsprung 9, Basel __________ Gagosian to Present New Works by Sarah Sze in Basel Gallery Artist’s First-Ever Exhibition in Switzerland Will Coincide with Art Basel 2021 Program Will Also Feature Sze’s First Large-Scale Outdoor Video Work as Part of Art Basel’s Parcours in the City’s Old Town Sculpture is everything physical outside of the mind’s eye. Painting is a sculpture. The digital is a sculpture. An image is a sculpture. They are sculpted with the senses: eyes, ears, mouths, fingers—all of them. The senses give form to these things, which we collect in order to build our imagination, memory, dreams—the nonphysical. Sculpture is a lens, a portal, not a medium. —Sarah Sze Gagosian is pleased to present Sarah Sze’s first-ever exhibition in Switzerland. This is her third exhibition with the gallery, coinciding with Art Basel 2021. Sze’s first large-scale outdoor video work will be a key feature of this year’s Art Basel Parcours. A peerless bricoleur credited with “changing the potential of sculpture,” Sze gleans from the physical and digital worlds, building artworks of staggering intricacy and diversity that invite minute observation while evoking a macroscopic perspective on the infinite. Activating the borders that separate mediums, she reflects on the overload of virtual experience and the confusion that it creates with our real experience in physical space. In paintings, sculptures, and video installations, Sze grapples with the ideas and matter of time and entropy, underscoring the precious and precarious nature of materiality. The works on view transform the galleries into a unified, image-laden expanse, allowing viewers to grasp the formal and conceptual breadth of Sze’s practice. Cast sculptures Wider than the Sky and Pound for Pound (both from the 2020–21 series Fallen Sky) are directly related to Sze’s landmark installation that was inaugurated at Storm King Art Center in upstate New York this summer. Inspired by ancient architecture and the language of ruins, they catch passing light and shadow, appearing as if already disintegrated.

In recent years, Sze has also returned to painting, adapting the processes of sculptural accumulation to two dimensions. Her richly textured yet loosely structured paintings collapse multiple forms of picture making into a dynamic whole. Sze weaves layers of paint and scraps of images—often visibly taped to the surfaces—into compositions of sweeping arcs, thrumming lines, and shimmering gradients. In freely combining photographic imagery and painterly mark making, these restless tableaux evoke the fluidity of the digital realm while retaining the aura of the analog and the handmade. A play of light beckons viewers from the rear gallery where the latest of Sze’s Timekeeper video installations plays, a co-op of structural elements and moving, sounding digital parts. From a makeshift rigging a pendulum swings, perpetually marking time and space across a salt-covered arena ringed by process-related flotsam and jetsam while disembodied video images track around the room, like searchlights. Art Basel Parcours For the Parcours program in the old part of the city of Basel, Sze has created Timepiece (2021), a large-scale outdoor video work that transforms the facade of a four-story building at the top of the historic Rheinsprung into a plume of moving images seemingly let loose from their frame. A multitude of randomly coded video sequences—a moon, a card trick, an electrical storm, and more—appears at dusk, rising, pixelating, glitching, and eventually dispersing. Like nature, they seem to have unpredictable lives of their own. In this mesmerizing live digital process, Sze further explores her original concept of timekeeping as a key framework for knowledge, meaning, and the record of life lived. This project is supported by Gagosian. Biography Sarah Sze was born in 1969 in Boston, and lives and works in New York. Collections include Fondation Cartier pour l’art contemporain, Paris; Tate, London; Museum of Modern Art, New York; Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York; Whitney Museum of American Art, New York; and M+, Hong Kong. Exhibitions include Triple Point, United States Pavilion, 55th Biennale di Venezia (2013, traveled to Bronx Museum of the Arts, New York, in 2014); Timekeeper, Rose Art Museum, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA (2016, traveled to Copenhagen Contemporary, in 2017); Centrifuge, Haus der Kunst, Munich (2017–18); Night into Day, Fondation Cartier pour l’art contemporain, Paris (2020). Sze participated in the 56th Biennale di Venezia (2015) and the ARoS Triennial, Aarhus, Denmark (2017). Recent permanent commissions include Blueprint for a Landscape, Second Avenue Subway, 96th Street Station, New York (2017); Shorter than the Day, LaGuardia Airport, New York (2020); and Fallen Sky, Storm King Art Center, New Windsor, NY (2021). _____ Sarah Sze, Untitled (Timekeeper), 2021, mixed media, including archival pigment prints, video projector, and pendulum, 80 1/2 × 48 × 30 inches (204.5 × 121.9 × 76.2 cm) © Sarah Sze. Photo: Sarah Sze Studio

#Sarah Sze #Gagosian

34 notes · View notes

thehereticpharaoh · 4 years ago

Text

Barbering, Tomb of Userhat

A.D. 1922; original ca. 1427–1400 B.C.

Twentieth Century; original New Kingdom

Nina de Garis Davies

On view at The Met Fifth Avenue in Gallery 135

This facsimile painting copies part of a scene in the tomb of Userhat (TT 56) at Thebes. This vignette depicts men waiting their turn to have their hair cut by the barber who is at work in the lower left. The facsimile was painted at the tomb in 1925-1926 by Nina deGaris Davis who was a member of the Graphic Section of the Museum's Egyptian Expedition.

Object Details

Title: Barbering, Tomb of Userhat

Artist: Nina de Garis Davies (1881–1965)

Period: Twentieth Century; original New Kingdom

Dynasty: Dynasty 18

Reign: reign of Amenhotep II

Date: A.D. 1922; original ca. 1427–1400 B.C.

Geography: From Egypt, Upper Egypt, Thebes

Medium: Tempera on paper

Dimensions: facsimile: h. 45 cm (17 11/16 in); w. 73 cm (28 3/4 in)

scale 1:1

framed: h. 48.6 cm (19 1/8 in); w. 76.2 cm (30 in)

Credit Line: Rogers Fund, 1930

Accession Number: 30.4.40

#ancient Egypt #barbershop #tomb of userhat #Kemet #hair cutting

19 notes · View notes

galaxybuilders · 3 years ago

Text

Top 3 ultra-luxury flats in Calicut

Calicut turned as the most mainstream region for real estate interest all over Kerala by large scale commercial hubs, physical and social infrastructures in Calicut. Most people around the world being keen on purchasing apartments in Calicut and other land properties. Well-known Real estate builders in Kerala have their new development projects in progress at Kozhikode city. The residential projects include villas, houses, luxury living apartments, and flat for sale in Calicut. The real estate market growth of Calicut has been robust and many families and investors prefer Kozhikode for its physical and social infrastructure.

Galaxy Builders is a prominent luxury developer in Calicut that connects the luxury dreams of our clients to reality. Galaxy Builders was set up in 1994 and has given Kozhikode a new dimension of luxury and trust. With the help of the latest technology, expert architects, engineers, and designers, we are building your dream apartments. Galaxy has already made its signature on many commercial and residential flats in Kozhikode. Let’s check out some of the ongoing ultra-luxury flat for sale in Calicut with their unique features and price from Galaxy Builders.

ELEVE MAISON

Galaxy Eleve Maison is our ongoing premium flats in Calicut that offers the best living experience which satisfies all residential needs within walking distance. The presence of good educational institutions, malls, walkaway access to supermarkets, hospitals adds to the positivity of this luxury flats for sale in Kozhikode. Eleve Maison is exclusively planned, exclusively gated with world-class amenities. With finest textures and finishes, lush green gardens, splendid indoor and outdoor spaces.

This apartment in Calicut stays loyal at Eranhipalam provides exclusive luxury with top-of-the-line features. It spread over an area of 76.2 cents of land with 52 units of accommodation provided. 2/3/4 BHK apartments are available with a built area of 1510 sq. ft to 3485 sq. ft. It is an under-construction project in Calicut with possession offered in March 2023.

Address: Sarovaram Bio Park Road, Eranhipalam, Calicut

RERA REGISTRATION NO: K-RERA/PRJ/157/2020

Let’s consider reading some of the features that make Eleve Maison different from another flat for sale at Calicut.

Key Features:

• Ideal location

• Smart Home Automation

• Access Controlled Lobby

• Biometric Main Door Lock

• Guest access control

• Landscaped garden

• Mini Theatre

• Covered car parking

• Security Personnel

Luxury life specification never ends and they are beyond your expectations, to know more find us here: Eleve Maison

MERIDIAN VERDE

In case you are searching for flawlessly created flat for sale at Kozhikode, Meridian Verde, a meridian of green will be a great option. All modern facilities required for a contemporary lifestyle are included in Galaxy Meridian Verde with an eco-friendly touch. Our luxury apartments in Calicut city stand as a symbolic initiative from us to the world on how we can implement green spaces in residential projects. Green views are allotted through a private garden, a vertical garden, and every point ensures a green soul in each flat.

Galaxy Meridian Verde spread over an area of 56 cents at Ashokapuram with well connected to all major transport facilities and all residential needs. It has a total of 1 tower with 52 premium apartments include 25 2.5BHK flats of 1520 sq. ft each and 25 3BHK apartments of 1910 sq. ft each. At the top, 2 top-of-the-line penthouses included where type A is 2720 sq. ft with a 1000 sq. ft terrace and type B is of 2450 sq. ft with a 600 sq. ft terrace. Galaxy Meridian Verde is suitable for individuals looking for both luxurious and affordable flats in Kozhikode.

Address: St. Vincent colony road, Ashokapuram, Kozhikode

RERA REGISTRATION NO: K-RERA/PRJ/156/2020

Key Features

• Eco-friendly construction material

• Biometric Entry for Apartments

• Smart Home Automation

• Video door phone

• Access Controlled Lobby

• Solar electricity production for common area

• Vertical garden & Hanging garden on the balcony

• Green car park roof

• Heat reflective glasses

• Glass sheathered balconies

• Eco-friendly paint

• Large ventilation for air circulation

Live in an eco-friendly hassle-free environment without missing premium living. Find us more here: Meridian Verde

MAGNUM OPUS

Magnum Opus is our masterpiece design of dazzling craftsmanship for you with world-class amenities and contemporary architecture. It is spread over an area of 1.11 acres and made out of three conjoined towers with 35 floors and contains 90 stylishly planned sky villas and flats in Calicut. Glass encased balconies in each flat give marvelous perspectives on the city beneath and Magnum Opus has benefits like connectivity to all major points, luxury amenities, lavish lifestyle, and more.

This luxury apartment is located near Malabar Christian College, Kannur Road, Calicut which spread over an area of 1.11 acres. Magnum Opus offers flats in Kozhikode that include 2/3/4 BHK flats with built-up area ranging from 1570 sq. ft – 1920 sq. ft, size of the villa is 3220 sq. ft. Let’s find some key unique features provided only by Magnum Opus, our premium flat in Calicut.

Address: Near Malabar Christian College, Kannur Road, Calicut

RERA REGISTRATION NO: K-RERA/PRJ/111/2020

Key Features:

• Tallest building in the whole Malabar

• Prime location

• Electric vehicle charging station powered by solar energy

• Luxury double-height lobby

• High-speed elevators have a claim speed of 2.8 m/s

• Smart home security

• Clubhouse

• Business center

• New generation security system

• Terrace garden on 21st floor

• Sauna, steam, massage room

• Indoor entertainment center

• Infinity pool with cascading waterfalls

Magnum Opus, our luxury apartment in Calicut is an unmatched residential property and will be an asset for your lifetime. Find more here: Magnum Opus

If you are looking for a luxury flat for sale in Calicut go through reviews, photo galleries, locality, floor plans, and more for a better understanding of our projects. We always wish to see the happiness in our clients and are focused to earn your trust with a focus on quality, technology, trends, and value for money. Get your dream apartment in Calicut from Galaxy Builders, leading builders and developers in Kozhikode, and experience the global living of luxury with us.

#top 3 flats in calicut #Luxury flats in Calicut #luxury flats in kozhikode #luxury apartment in calicut #flats in calicut #apartments in calicut #flats and apartments #top builders in calicut #premium flats in calicut

1 note · View note

weekendjail · 5 years ago

Photo

Polish Army 75mm Wz.1902/26 Field Gun used in World War Two.

Some excerpts from my good Polish friend at PIBWL who does great work doing research and translating documents into English, (I just did some very light editing work here): “...Wz.1902/26 guns were the only gun type used in eleven Mounted Artillery Detachments (Polish: Dywizjon artylerii konnej, dak), in each Cavalry Brigade. In 1938 there were 210 guns in the mounted artillery. A detachment (Polish: dywizjon, not to confuse with a division) had 12 or 16 guns, in four-gun batteries; their number depended on whether the Cavalry Brigade had three or four cavalry regiments. The battery consisted of two platoons. In 1939 there were eight three-battery detachments (Nos. 2-7, 13, 14) and three four-battery detachments (Nos. 1, 9, 11). There were also created at least three additional batteries and one platoon of surplus guns during the mobilization.Second user of 75 mm wz.1902/26 guns were two-gun infantry artillery platoons in 90 Infantry Regiments of 30 regular Infantry Divisions. Their primary purpose was to provide the infantry with a direct support in an attack. In 1938 there were 186 guns in the infantry. Despite plans, regiments of reserve Infantry Divisions did not receive own artillery. It is noteworthy, that Polish regimental artillery had longer range (and potential anti-tank capabilities), than regimental artillery of enemies, as a side effect of adopting old field guns instead of special short-barrel infantry guns. On the other hand, special infantry guns were lighter and could accompany the infantry more easily (not mentioning, that German and Soviet infantry regiments had more guns available). 75 mm guns wz.02/26 were also used in Polish armoured trains, mounted in artillery turrets of armoured wagons, on original shortened gun beds, or on anti-aircraft Lender mountings. Ten mobilized armoured trains used 25 guns 75 mm in total, four more guns were in reserve wagons. Apart from 75 mm wz.1902/26 guns, a small number of original 76.2 mm wz.1902 guns remained in Polish service - there were 89 in August 1939. Half of these guns were used to create 22 two-gun positional artillery platoons, assigned to units defending fortified areas (eg. Wizna, Modlin, Węgierska Górka, Osowiec). They were meant for a stationary defense, for they had no horse teams and could be pulled for a short distance only by crews. According to some sources, part of them were to be built-in into fortifications. It should be noted, that wz.1902 guns differed from all other guns used by the Polish in 1939 by having a Russian system of scaling sights and training mechanism. There was also created one three-gun platoon No. 111, but in summer of 1939 one of its 76.2 mm guns was clandestinely sent to Polish transit depot at Westerplatte in Gdańsk, defense of which became one of symbols of Polish campaign. It was the only field gun available at Westerplatte and on 1 September 1939 it fired 28 rounds across a harbour channel, destroying German MG emplacements in warehouses, before it was damaged by a battleship "Schleswig-Holstein". The platoon No.111 itself, with two guns, was assigned to the 2nd Naval Rifle Regiment of the Land Coastal Defense, defending an area around Gdynia until 19 September 1939 (apart from these, it had own platoon of 75 mm wz.1897 guns, and both types operated together, what caused some trouble for a commanding officer, due to different methods of aiming). Some guns were given to the KOP - Border Protection Corps, defending an eastern border against the Soviet invasion after 17 September 1939. There were at least 7 guns assigned in September 1938 for Sarny fortified area (it is however not clear, if they were not replaced with wz.1897 guns subsequently, according to later order). The KOP also had three of the mentioned positional artillery platoons, created in KOP NCO School in Osowiec (Nos.36-38).Most of Polish artillery pieces were captured by the Germans, the rest were captured by the Soviets. In November-December 1940 the Germans sold to Finland 54 original 76 mm guns model 1902, presumably of Polish origin. In Finland they were designated 76 K/02 and joined 195 guns of this model already in possession (most being captured from the Soviets in 1918-1940). It was most numerous Finnish field gun of World War II, and they remained for training for many years after“ Artwork by: J. Wróbel

11 notes · View notes

cryan7937-blog · 5 years ago

Text

What are Model Railroad Buildings?

Tiny buildings, tiny details.

Model railroad buildings are a unique way to craft the world around you or even a place that doesn't exist. You can print scales, or also buy them, but what is a model railroad building? They are small houses, shops, museums, stores, and so many more tiny buildings that you can craft for railroad models. These small buildings are always the same proportions as real life, just at different scales. There is an HO scale, which is the most common, OO scale, and N scale. The HO scale is a 1:87 scale, which means for every foot in the real world, it is 3.5 mm in the model. The OO scale is a 1:76.2 (for every foot it is 4 mm) and is the most popular in the United Kingdom! The N scale has a range of 1:148 - 1:160, although the distance between the rails on the railroad is the same with all scales on the N scale. This distance is 9mm. Whatever scale you choose, there are dozens of models you can use to make your railroad exciting and fun. You can add scenery with trees and grass and hills, and you can make it whatever season you desire. Another fantastic thing about model railroad buildings is that there is an intense attention to detail. Each building is designed carefully and intricately to look as though you shrunk a building at our scale. Not only is this hobby an excellent way to channel your creative side, but it is also a fantastic way to reflect the world around you. For more ideas check this plans for scale model houses.

youtube

1 note · View note

cvltofthepopcvlture · 6 years ago

Photo

Netero vs Meruem (Hunter x Hunter) 1/6 scale diorama by Figurama Collectors

The time has finally come! Netero and Meruem clash in the full reveal of Figurama Collectors Hunter x Hunter Elite Fandom Statue!

The world premiere Hunter x Hunter statue by Figurama Collectors portrays the cataclysmic duel between the two most powerful characters—Chimera Ant King Meruem and the grand master of the Shingen-ryū school of kung fu, Netero. The 76.2 cm high (30 inch) battlefield explodes in a cloud of blinding debris beneath a giant Ninety-Ninth Hand palm strike, revealing a Gungi board—symbolic of the Chimera Ant Arc’s emotional climax and Meruem’s special connection with Komugi.

In true 1/6 scale, the second installment in the Figurama Collectors Elite Fandom series is its most visually complex yet, spanning a massive 76.2 cm x 69.9 cm (30 inches x 27.5 inches) diorama that surpasses most 1/4 scale statues. Rounding out a layered and lifelike color scheme, Netero’s Bodhisattva arms are finished with majestic antique gold paint and translucent tips that convey their blurring speed in dynamic glory. An alternative expression allows collectors to depict the master of Nen with his eyes closed in prayerful concentration, focusing on Meruem’s attacks. The finishing touch is a gilded base with wrought iron-like details, encircled by the names “Netero” and “Meruem” spelled in the Hunter x Hunter alphabet, accurately translated from their original kanji.

- Limited to 800pcs - Fully sculpted by the renowned sculptor Keita Okada - Comes with certificate of authenticity hand signed by Figurama Collectors CEO Shanab and sculptor Keita Okada - Hand painted with premium coloring by Three Eyes Studio - 2 Swappable heads for Netero - Concept art by Jarold Sng - Creative direction by Figurama Collectors Development team - Approx. size: True 1/6 scale – H 76.2 cm x W 69.9 cm x D 64.3 cm (H 30in x W 27.5in x D 25.3in) - MATERIALS: Ecofriendly Polystone, Translucent Resin, PU - Price: $835 -Non Refundable Deposit: 20% - Payment Plan: Up to 6 months - Paying by a secure card (VISA, Mastercard, American Express, JCB) will take $45 off shipping costs

Join our private group for exclusive news, contests and much more Figurama Collectors Hub

#netero #meruem #hunter x hunter #anime #manga #figurama collectors #diorama #statues #collectibles #1/6 scale

23 notes · View notes

anapedias · 3 years ago

Text

How Long Is 8 Inches Compared To An Object 25

Measure yours to see how close it is to 1 inch. Show activity on this post.

How Long Is 8 Inches Compared To An Object? Measuring Stuff

Teach yourself how to use a ruler to measure inches.★ want more free weekly math videos?

How long is 8 inches compared to an object. If you want to also involve the angles, you have. 1 inch = 2.54 centimeters → inches to centimeters; If the ruler divides the inches into eighths, 5/8 inch is the fifth mark on the ruler from the left side.

How tall is 30 inches? Eight inches is equal to two “hands,” where a hand is a unit of measure traditionally used to measure the height of a horse, originally based. 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Each pencil is 7.5 inches long. Not all dice are the same size. 0.05 ≈ 5.7248 ° 2 tan.

After all, you should always have a thumb handy for a guide for measuring items under 6 inches (15cm)! This can vary depending on the brand of the pencil being used. 1 inch = 0.0833 foot → inches to feet;

Other items that equal 30 inches tall are: Circumference of a 8″ diameter circle. All this verticl lines called as fraction of inches or graduation of inches.

When we have 12 inches together, it is known as a foot. Thanks to the intercept theorem this is indeed a simple ratio: 8 inches is equal to 20.32 centimeters or 203.2 millimeters.

Waleetson tower vs torre latinoamericana vs torre obispado i vs mega waleetson tower vs giga waleetson tower vs burj khalifa; Multiplying 57.29 by 60 minutes per degree we get 3,437.4 which means that an object at a distance of 3,437.4 times its size will have an angular size of 1 minute. What is the circumference of a circle with a diameter of 8 in?

In the united states, standard notebook paper is 8 and a half inches wide and 11 inches tall. Similarly, you may ask, what is 5/8 of an inch on a ruler? And the last one 1/32 inches ruler divided by 32 verticle lines.

A piece of notebook paper. 1 inch = 0.0254 meter 1 inch = 25.4 millimeters → inches to millimeters, → millimeters to inches; One inch (2.5 cm) is roughly the measurement from the top knuckle on your thumb to your thumb tip.

This resulted in length ranging 4.0 inches to 8.5 inches (10.2 cm to 21.6 cm), and. Haptic information from 3d objects improved shape identification compared to. According to the new research in bjui, the average flaccid penis is 3.61 inches in length and 5.16 inches in length when erect.

Depending on your size, you may compare the length of a meter to the length of your foot, or the length of your arms, or the distance from the floor to your waist (or your armpit, or your bellybutton). In model miniatures, such as standard dollhouse scale (1:12), 1 inch is equal to roughly 1 foot. Circumference of a 8 inch diameter circle.

1 kilometer = 100 000 centimeters 30 inches is equal to 2.5 feet or 76.2 centimeters. 🍎 thank you for watching our comparing measurements song.

Even longer bed pillows often have a height of 18 inches at each side, so you can still visualize nine inches by picturing half of a pillow’s height. How far around is a circle that is 8 inches across? If the ruler divides the inches into 16ths, it is the 10th mark.

In metric units, eight inches is equal to 203.20 millimeters or 20.320 centimeters. Α 2 = 10 feet 100 feet α = 2 arctan. 1 inch = 0.0277 yard kilometer conversion:

In 1/8 inches ruler one inches divided by 8 verticl lines in 1/16 inches ruler one inches divided by 16 verticle lines. It’s common to see pencils that are 6 inches (152.4mm) long and 3.5 inches (88.9mm) long. Like 1/8, 1/4, 3/8, 1/2, 5/8, 3/4, 7/8.

For example, in my usual shoes, 4. Other items that equal 8 inches long are: To help compare different orders of magnitude, this section lists lengths between 10 −3 m and 10 −2 m (1 mm and 1 cm).

X 3 feet = 10 feet 100 feet x = 0.3 feet. An inch is defined as exactly 2.54 centimeters (a metric measurement) lots of things are measured in inches from rainfall to paper length. There are three types of inches ruler 1/8, 1/16, 1/32.

The scale for the blueprint says that 1 inch on the blueprint is. 1 foot = 304.8 millimeters 1 foot = 0.333 yard inch conversion: To estimate how tall nine inches is, simply look at or visualize a standard throw pillow and cut the size in half.

1 foot = 12 inches Your 3d printer software will tell you exactly how long prints will take. Or to put it another way:

The screen height of most tablet computers is about eight inches, though many models are an inch or two larger or smaller. How long is 8 inches? When an object's distance is 57.29 times its size, it has an angular size of 1 degree.

2′ 1.133″ feet and inches. Measuring in inches gives us a way for everyone to understand the size of something. Eighteen inches is twice as long as nine inches.

A blueprint for a building includes a rectangular room that measures 3 inches long and 5.5 inches wide. 7 vs 6 vs 8 vs 1:4; Use standard objects to compare lengths, check your wallet, use any paper money to be our compare object, then search the width of your paper money online, when you know the width, you can adjust the ruler's ppi setting by it, you can compare to any standard size object at your side, e.g., coin, credit card, cd, paper money, mobile phone, in the office, a a4 size printable.

In other words, 8 inches is 0.26 times the length of a man's footstep, and the length of a man's footstep is 3.8 times that amount.

#inches #object

0 notes

aic-design · 3 years ago

Photo

No More No Less (Chicago) Model, Pezo von Ellrichshausen, 2017, Art Institute of Chicago: Architecture and Design

No More No Less is an ongoing project in which the architects of the firm Pezo Von Ellricshausen insert a museum at a 1:10 scale into an exhibition space. Inside the rooms of the miniature museum are representations of the studio’s work. The positioning of an architectural model within a “mother-model” generates a double reduction that speaks to a paradox inherent to architecture: the unavoidable need to exhibit architecture as a representation of an absent object and architecture itself as the representation of yet another thing, such as an idea, a value, or a technique. Celia and David Hilliard Fund Size: 101.6 × 76.2 × 25.4 cm (40 × 30 × 10 in.) Medium: MDF, paint, paper and wood

https://www.artic.edu/artworks/240773/

#architectureanddesign #artinstituteofchicago #museumarchive #pezovonellrichshausen

0 notes

cma-european-art · 3 years ago

Photo

The Kiss of Peace and Justice, Laurent de La Hyre , 1654, Cleveland Museum of Art: European Painting and Sculpture

https://clevelandart.org/art/1971.102

#cmaopenaccess #museumarchive #clevelandartmuseum #europeanart

7 notes · View notes

madilynskeyreid · 4 years ago

Text

Initial space planning

Space planning

https://www.dimensions.com/collection/office-workplace-layouts

Overall space.

Paths and walkways around my design: The minimum width for a walkway is 48 inches (121.9 cm), which allows for two pedestrians to walk side by side comfortably. It is recommended, however, to increase the width if possible in high use public areas to at least 72 inches (182.88 cm).

Mezzanine - The mezzanine will be made from ⅓ of the great hall. 17m long and 11m wide positioned on the left hand side of the great hall. It will be raised 7.5M. The positioning and height of the mezzines allows optimum natural light on the mezzanine and ground floor. balustrade height 1.1m

Wheelchair Accessibility - The current stairs within the great hall are 1.06m. I will be positioning a wheelchair ramp on the west side of the great hall's entrance. The maximum allowable slope in any new construction is 1:12 with a maximum rise of 30” (76.2 cm) without a landing. A ramp with a slope between 1:12 and 1:16 can have a maximum horizontal length of 30’ (9.14 m) without a landing. A ramp with a slope between 1:16 and 1:20 can have a horizontal run up to 40’ (12.19 m) before requiring a landing.

Spiral Stairs - maximum permitted pitch of 37º with a maximum riser height of 190 mm and minimum tread depth of 280 mm, with all riser height and tread depths being equal over the stair.

Area 1 - Experience - (The studio space for people to create and experiences evas use of tools, materials, processes, lighting qualities)

Studio tables (working, creative tables and space):

Within the space there will be 4 working benches within the studio space. Each bench will be at standing height and allow the individuals to process work actively with others. The work benches will be 2 meters wide by 1 meter width and 1meter in height. A clearance of 48” | 122 cm between tables and a wall is recommended for maximum flexibility and movement. Tables will be positioned 3 minutes from each other to ensure maximum flexibility and movement when working.

Drying rack:

Storage shelves:

Area 2 - Encounter - Exhibit/display (Mezzanine exhibit space/gallery for people to experience her work

(Art work ideally is hung at eye level, and 1.6m from center to the floor.)

Viewing Benches. One top of the mezzanine is the “gallery space”. Within this space I will position 2 benches to observe the art. The height of a bench is typically between 0.5m and 0.6m (50-60 cm). Although this is the average range, the height of a bench is dependent on its use. Benches can have a depth anywhere from 38-51 cm. Bench length can range from 107-152 cm and can fit 3-4 people comfortably. Benches will be positioned at different areas of exhibition space.

Dimentions of art pieces in the space:

Eva Hesse, Accession II, 1968, 1969 (box) - Overall: 30 3/4 × 30 3/4 × 30 3/4 inches, 117 pounds (78.1 × 78.1 × 78.1 cm, 53.1 kg)

No title, 1969-1970 (rop sculpture) - Dimensions Variable (roughly 2m x 1m)

Repetition Nineteen III, 1968 (latex pods) - 19 translucent, bucket-like forms. Each 19 to 20 1/4" (48 to 51 cm) x 11 to 12 3/4" (27.8 to 32.2 cm) in diameter

Accretion1968 - 55 poles 147,5 x ca. 1200 cm

untitled piece of Eva Hesse's Studiowork (1968) (cluster of tubes) - 50cm x 50cm

Self-portrait , 1961–1961Oil on Canvas Size: 91.4 x 91.4 cm. (36 x 36 in.)

Ringaround Arosie 1965 26 3/8 x 16 1/2 x 4 1/2" (67 x 41.9 x 11.4 cm)

Area 3 - Exchange - (Pod-like structures are larger scale models of her sculptures. Experience material manipulation etc)

Repetition Nineteen III, 1968 (latex pods) - 19 translucent pods. The pods will be scattered in size. One pod will be the main pod with a 2m radius. Roughly allowing 5-6 people in the space comfortably at a time. The pods will range from 1m-5m in height.

Does it need to be evas work? Can it be works which people have made

must be enough space when people walk through tunnel space to stairs

Focusing on how the pods are used

The layout how to control the uncontrollable. (having pods which are structured in a way, however their forms and materials are uncontrolled.

Feedback from Jen:

- When discussing my concept with Jen, we came to the conclusion that the gallery space should be an area for individuals to display their work after creating in the studio space. This idea makes better use of the space as previously I designed it to would be a gallery for Eva hesses sculptures, however seeing as the “pod” like structures are large scale models of her sculptures it didn't seem valid to have both spaces so similar.

- We also decided that the “rope-like structure” should be taken out of the design as I felt it made the design childish and didn't fit well into the space.

- The large scale pole sculpture of Eva I am using as the stairs pathway and mezzine support will extend through the muezzin to the roof to create a more dramatic effect and create more depth to the space.

Key elements which the gallery space need to include:

- Minimalistic

- Bright

- Light to ensure art work and material manipulation can be seen

- Open

Developing the space:

After the lighting workshop with Sven, I realised that the gallery space was rather boring and lacked any interest. seeing as the mezzanine will be filled with natural light from sky light and great halls windows I feel it Is the perfect opportunity to play with lighting. I am interesting in inserting some kind of structure/feature which plays with the lighting, however still ensures the gallery space has all the elements you would find within Evas past exhibition spaces (minimalistic, bright, open, spot lighting)

I will be using lighting to light up the sculptures e.g the fibreglass tubes will have a focal light on them to give them a glowing effect while still showing the materially and process involved in making that particular sculpture. Spot lights will reduce any shadows or area where the light doesn't represent the sculpture how it should.

I will use a mixture of flood lights and spot lights on sculptures such as Evas sculpture Accession II. accession is made from fibreglass and wire, therefore it may reflective qualities which could be rather harsh or take away from the materiality, therefore adding a lot of flat light will reduce glare or distraction.

Inside the ‘pathway” to stairs I will use multiple led lights in the flooring to lead the way, but also light up the inside to see the materials. this will add a glowing effect on the outside due to the structures transparent nature.

Responding to the movement of the human body, the sizes and relationships of stair risers and treads are regulated to make vertical motion safe and easy. Steep stairs make climbing more tiring and dangerous, while shallow stairs are awkward and inefficient for our human stride. Buildings codes have been created to control the minimum and maximum measurements of risers and treads. As general rules of thumb for achieving comfortable relationships between riser and tread dimensions, the following formulas can be used: ‍ Tread (inches) + 2x Riser (inches) = 24”-25” (26” for exterior stairs) Riser (inches) x Tread (inches) = 72”-75”

In general public spaces a minimum of 44” (112 cm) must be met—providing ample space for one person and allowing the tight passage of two people. Comfortable two person stair widths range between 49” (125 cm) to 60” (152 cm)

0 notes