#‘mannosphere’
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
we’re also going to have to address the radicalization men have undergone over the past few years. i don’t believe that men would’ve voted like this in 2020 or 2016 and im 70% blaming it on the misogynistic manifestos they’re listening to and reading on the daily.
i hope we give all the young and/or college-educated and/or minority men who voted for trump the hell they deserve
#‘mannosphere’#‘red pilled’#‘alpha beta sigmas’#KYS#podcast tax when??#banning Twitter when??#and ik we on radblr talk about it#but im gonna need peer review studies about it like asap
47 notes
·
View notes
Note
I think the reason I find Stolases two crybaby songs so jarring is that Blitzø does not fit this melodramatic epic of tortured romance, at all. He’s a lighthearted funny silly character with a bit of a temper. He just doesn’t fit Stolas and his narrative in any way. Their histories and their lives are not meaningfully or naturally intertwined whatsoever. It’s just brute force. And them both hating themselves, being poor at communicating and emotionally stunted, does not make them made for each other, it’s the opposite. And I’d argue Blitzø communicates very openly and consistently, stolas is just impossible.
They do not have romantic overtones outside of pity or superficial attraction, onscreen their chemistry is awful, it’s all forced sexual harassment “jokes”. In a sense the running gag with them is how utterly out of sync and incompatible they are. I think the anger and resentment toward Blitzø that Viv clearly has, just comes from this idea Vivienne hasn’t unlearned since that catcalling comic, she sees sexual harassment as a compliment you should make the most of. You could almost insert Blitzø and Viv into that comic with stolas as the creep, and replace “men are pigs” with “royal demons are the worst”
With that disgusting attitude and the decision to take all of Blitzøs ire toward stolas and pin it on Stella and via instead, I think you could safely say stolases story has mannosphere/red pilled messaging.
Honestly, they worked so much better as a duo -- and in a way, as a ship -- when Stolas was a rich asshole that Blitzo was forced to put up with after seducing once and their relationship was meant to be absurdly, comically awful. At no point in the show's history have they even been shown to be better people for knowing each other, or for spending time together, but Viv's stamping her feet and screaming that they are because they are in her head, I guess.
55 notes
·
View notes
Text
there’s an epidemic of young women getting randomly punched the face in nyc (30 confirmed incidents this week!) and the right/mannosphere is blaming it on women because we “voted democrat” ……
#people will blame anyone but men#theyre saying if it were conservative men instead of liberals around us we would be protected….sure….
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Kim from For Harriet had a video up about I think either the mannosphere or the economic landscape of black women in America and she said that the black community is about a decade ahead of American culture and that black men had been complaining about black women, how we are too mannish, not submissive and don’t know how to be wives and how we were leaving them behind and now it’s reached the “greater American culture” where men feel left behind and angry and depressed bc they’re left with themselves.
but black women have been dealing with this for years already. i need to find and finish that video bc that was an interesting segment she had
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
one side says “6b4t gyns lets poll which way to destroy the patriachical mannosphere and do a deep dive on which west coast vegan horticultural laynd produces the healthiest underarm hair growth on average” and the other side says “those fascist dykes only care about jesus and being a submissive housewife and wearing makeup” and that is BARELY an exaggeration like it genuinely feels like im on crazy pills what the hell is going on.
this is Genuinely what happens when people stop lurking and just make shit up instead
I try not to take the bait anymore but god its so annoying to see "radical feminists are the real misogynists and love the beauty industry" treated as a serious idea
44 notes
·
View notes
Text
It feels like every few months one of those "Masculinist Influencer" mannosphere dickheads gets publicly dunked on because they liked a Femboy thirst trap on main.
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
something interesting that i think i perhaps don’t talk about enough is now long i’ve been on the internet. prior to 2010 by a couple of years, during a time where forums/threads and blogs were the predominant form of “social” media. MySpace existed, but was primarily for sharing pictures and music; discourse was happening on forums and blog comment sections.
women have been using these forms of technomedia as long as they have existed, and feminist women have been using them to talk about feminism for just as long. the more prominent bloggers settled into their niches, but a wide variety of material was covered.
the thing i wish that i could impress upon young people, especially younger women who are growing up in the 24/7 twitter/instagram/tiktok era, is that not a single idea you see on these platforms is new.
i go on a lot about the dangers of social media, of being online every waking minute, of putting your face and personal info on the internet, and i stand by that, but i feel very strongly that this is more important. every argument you see being waged in a comment section on a post has been waged before.
the “sides” are called different names. the details of arguments shift with the times; we talk now about onlyfans the way women before us talked about internet porn the way women before them talked about video VHS rentals. but the core underlying principals upon which everyone’s belief systems rest? those are old.
the thing that i find particularly insidious now is that the arguments of people who formerly called themselves--openly, gleefully, and frankly as maliciously as possible--antifeminists, chauvinists, and misogynists, are now presenting themselves as feminists.
the belief that feminists, especially lesbians, are unfair to men, to the extent that they are said to be oppressing them? this was the view of misogynists before it was the view of pseudofeminists.
the belief that the sexual subjugation of the female sex class is “empowering” grew from both liberal feminists who refused to follow their own belief system to its logical conclusion and from misogynists who believe they have an unmitigated right to use women for their own sexual pleasure.
pull the threads of any modern pseudofeminist belief and follow them back through time, you’ll find a misogynist. Men’s rights activists, the mannosphere, PUAs, MGTOWs. They didn’t disappear. They didn’t stop sharing their belief systems. They didn’t stop harming the women in their real lives. They didn’t change their minds or their hearts or their ideas or their behaviors.
They changed their names, their faces, and their pronouns.
19 notes
·
View notes
Text
just woke up and my older sister is listening to mannosphere rhetoric
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
like the damage these ppl have done…. there is many ppl that associate eren with mannosphere now thx to aoe and erehisu….. i will never forgive them….
the state of the aot fandom today is soooo sad…. like. i hate to say it but it was better when ereris were running it yea cursed ship but it wasnt misery and discourse everyday and a significant proportion of the fandom wasnt basically anime mgtows ……. sigh….. miss the days of jaeger bombastic….. do u wanna kill some titans…. marco is still alive theories… the bubblepop cmv……
4 notes
·
View notes
Note
I don't think a movie like aliens could be made today without major backlash from mannosphere groups and a deafening amount of thinkpieces written about the implications of a completely unsexualized and ordinary looking female character and why or why not its problematic that she's masc or doesn't wear makeup and why or why not it's problematic that the male and female characters are treated basically the same by the narrative and the camera. It would be absolutely unbearable I can tell you that much
agreed even alien would probably never be made today
28 notes
·
View notes
Note
I know reddit is a cesspool but I came across yet another post that was like nOt aLL Asian mEn and I’ve been fuming. Like they really don’t know what they’re like. The number of genuine male friendships I have are so few and precious. I’m really fucking sleepy I’ll send another anon tomorrow because I have thoughts (tm)
oooh please do! I'm actually on Reddit a bunch, mostly because they have really helpful tutorials/pirating resources.
but yeah the manosphere is extremely insufferable (even the mannosphere of colooouuuur)
#asks#anonymous#asian esp south Asian men are really the worst like the male preferential child rearing really goes in their heads#i am bisexual but for indian men i am lesbian
1 note
·
View note
Text
was reading through the archive of wehuntedthemammoth (used to be a blog dedicated to making fun of the mannosphere, now more focused on trump, and run by a dude) and I found a thread where a bunch of previous commenters were banned for being “terfs”, even though they:
said they would accept trans women into women’s spaces within reason
didn’t ~misgender~ anyone
prefaced pretty much every comment with “not all trans women!!!!1!!!”
were objecting mostly to the devaluing of female-specific issues, the way that trans commenters often spoke over women commenters, the lesbophobia directed towards those who wouldn’t have sex with males, and the use of the word “terf” on the forum
only got hostile by the end of the thread because they were being attacked and threatened with bans (which ultimately went through) for calling themselves radfems or expressing gender critical beliefs
like it just goes to show that it doesn’t matter what you do. you can be nice to them, you can toe the line, you can self-flagellate, but if you dare to say, “you can’t change your sex” or “lesbians don’t have to have sex with penises” or “I don’t feel privileged for being female”, even if you say it with as many caveats as possible, you will be attacked. you will be threatened. you will be banned. although, really, while I used to lurk on this website back in my libfem days, I can’t say I’m surprised. it’s run by a white dude, so of course the pressing issues of white dudes are always gonna matter more to him. he’s not in any danger. he can sit on his high horse and condescend to all the eeeeevil terfs about how they’re Literally Committing Violence by mentioning xy chromosomes and it’s no skin off his nose.
also saw this gem from one of the commenters:
yes, the privilege of female bathrooms (where males, in any kind of clothing/presentation, can follow you in and assault you, or put cameras in the stalls, or what have you)! obituaries not misgendering me (why tf would I give two shits about what my obituary says, I’m dead)! no one cares about female genitals (except for cat-callers, rapists, the government, etc)!
#my post#libfem bs#misogyny#this is mostly for me to get my thoughts down about this because it really was wild#i recognized a few of the commenters' usernames though and i think a few of them might be on feminist current now?? possibly on tumblr too??
0 notes
Text
[OpenTTD RP] Aspergia in 1953
We are in the third year of our five year plan. Things are going to expectation with the 10 Songbun cities named, and the population having now increased to 150,000 thanks to the leader’s efforts.
The $6,000,000 infrastructural loan was repaid in 6 months with the rapid growth of the economy, which has seen the following production quota in the respective years:
1950: 10 million units (primarily passenger) 1951: 26 million units (half-passenger; quarter-agricultural, quarter-industrial) 1952: 55 million units (two-fifths passanger; the remainder a mixture of agricultural, industrial, and raw resource) 1953: 112 million units (one-third passenger; two-thirds other goods/raw materials)
Averaging economic growth on a productivity measure (the preferred Marxist measure) at ~120% annually, with approximately ~1,500-2,000% growth having been expected towards the end of the plan, primarily through the development of industrial transportation infrastructure and freight infrastructure.
On a monetary measure: 1950: $14 million 1951: $56 million 1952: (passenger fares were hiked to the maximum or 5 times the default; despite this, they grew in number) $440 million 1953: $700 million
Growths for these years respectively on a monetary measure:
Cumulatively, the national monetary economy has grown by exactly 50 times, and is expected to do so a further 20-30 times by the end of the plan, thanks to the sagacious leaders’ work.
Kwailso regions have been gifted occasional bus networks from the proceeds, with a total investment value of $20 million. These region’s growth will be controlled at a rate so as to ensure they do not comprise anything near 10% of the population, whilst it is hope the big Songbun cities, now cumulatively at a population of 60,000, continue to prosper. Mid-Songbun cities are production cities and so have curtailed food requirements; despite requiring food to grow, they’re being deprived of it to maintain a stagnancy of population, however, nobody is dying, which I’ll explain by indigenous subsistence farming.
JUDICIARY ANNOUNCEMENTS:
LagoonaBlue -- insubordination, impersonation of a woman, impersonation of the suryeong, attempting to copyright the suryeong's ideas under false pretenses to attribution of authorship, failure to adhere to Womanhood in the Aspergian lifestyle, treason, betrayal of the state, homosexual offences, and transsexualism-of-the-sexualized-type offences (which will be a subsection under "Womanhood in the Aspergian lifestyle" legal-code) Cuntster -- insubordination, attempt to overthrow the state, impersonation of the suryeong, attempting to rewrite the suryeong's ideas under false pretenses to attribution of authorship with his "neo-Aspergianism", failure to adhere to Womanhood in the Aspergian lifestyle (same sub-section offense: hypersexualized womanhood impersonation), treason, betrayal of the state, homosexual offences pre-transition (we will retroactively find an alibi if there truly isn't, but, I'm confident he has) Introman -- temporary collusion; ADMONISHED on grounds of mannospheric contributions to the philosophy (will remain permanently on file; you'll still be high-Songbun) David Chac -- temporary collusion; ADMONISHED on return to and forgiveness of the suryeong (leaders don't have a Songbun; they're untouchable) Miss Hortensia -- distortion of Aspergian Socialism is a Science, Final Retrospections, and other Aspergian literatures to overthrow the state (the ultimate charge) with empiricism of the Western style; "Womanhood in the Aspergian style" may not be necessary NobleGreyHorse -- treason, betrayal of state, insubordination; "Womanhood in the Aspergian style" may be initially charged then dropped if she can prove to adapt in 6 months; homosexual offences dropped based on genuine genetic need and bisexual capacity SENTENCES: LagoonaBlue -- indefinite relocation to Kwailso; POST-EDIT: a judicial review also grants gradual starvation to death, starting with a 450g mixed corn-rice ration downwards, to 375g, then 250g, then 150g, then 100g -- if he survives despite this, and proves moderate productivity quota, release will be considered to a low-end mid-Songbun city with reasonable amenities and a David Chac University campus with an opportunity to retrain in the Aspergian classics, along with hospital treatment to treat malnutrition; the punishment is not in a view of revenge, but in a view to make one realize their bourgeois privilege and the benevolence of proletarians Cuntster -- indefinite relocation to Kwailso with a view to eventual execution after 5 years Introman -- ADMONISHMENT means you're free to go; you will be placed in the outerskirts of a high-Songbun city with travel expenses paid, it'll be near good amenities and the apartment, by even Scotland's standards, moderately luxurious, you will be awarded professorship at David Chac University in the Mannospheric Sciences pending on a 40,000 word dissertation's completion, to be submitted whenever -- consider that your free education David Chac -- the sentence is just to show the world an example of the integrity of our justice system holding even untouchables to account; he will be freed if temporarily house-arrested for 6 months to satisfy the world's lust for revenge Miss Hortensia -- public execution, no Kwailso stay NobleGreyHorse -- possible eventual ADMONISHMENT if she adheres to bail; will be relocated, then, to a mid-Songbun part of a University/College correspondence city (they are all linked to David Chac University) to be retrained in and lecture Aspergian Social Sciences with an emphasis on Womanhood in the Aspergian Lifestyle (read: 1st-wave feminism). She will be given moderately high rations by the state and similar living conditions to introman.
0 notes
Text
I think the issue is you are taking essentialist things from 2 different sources tbh, men vs women, and expecting them to be the same. I’ll try to elaborate a bit, but bear with me, I feel like crap today.
From our perspective it’s more that men are naturally predisposed to violence in general than women and not just against women. There’s evidence of this both in animals and throughout history. I personally don’t agree or argue the remainder of that paragraph and I have not seen others either. In fact, I think a lot of arguments around rape I’ve seen explicitly mention the fact it’s often not even about reproduction, again both in animals and humans. So from that perspective it would make for a pretty crappy reproductive/evolutionary strategy.
I’d say the second paragraph has issues in that it conflates men and women. Again I don’t necessarily buy rape as evolutionary strategy, but in general what works for men may not be what works for women because men and women, like male and female animals, are different and have different interests. The question becomes why would women or female animals ever evolve to select something that is detrimental to them? It’s not like other things like our head size and hips for example, which gives an advantage even as it makes childbirth dangerous. Rape confers nothing to women, no advantage and if it confers nothing to us, how would it help the species in general? So even if what mras/the mannosphere says about rape is true, that it’s a valid male strategy, it makes no sense to reach this conclusion that women want to be raped. If this were the case, we would probably have less dead or injured males tbh.
As for female submission, if female submission was natural, you would not see so much resistance in both female animals and humans and you would not need so many systems, like gender, male violence, female exclusion, etc., in order to keep it in place. It would not need to be beaten into us and we would likely not have feminist movements around the globe.
I don’t think the remaining paragraphs have much bearing if any on what essentialist feminists are discussing so no offense, but I’m going to skip them. I do want to point out though that even if it is the case that men are predisposed to violence, this does not make patriarchy natural. It’s still something they set up, all over the world. And unlike these men who advocate what you’ve described here, no essentialist women believe that inherent traits or tendencies excuse said inherent traits or tendencies. Behavior is a choice and humans are plenty capable of going against nature.
I’d suggest looking at @abfabrad and her essentialist tag for more info on it from women’s perspective, it’s probably going to be a better source than what I can offer right now, but hope that helps a bit
It does still amaze me that not only do people on tumblr call themselves feminists while arguing that women are naturally weaker than men and that women’s oppression in general and rape in particular is biologically natural but then also have the gall to act like they are some kind of “more hardcore” feminist than us normal people.
112 notes
·
View notes