sanhaoche

[sanhaoche]

a few days ago i woke up thinking: snails are cute, but what if they had legs?

so i made this, and i was like "aww yeahhh such a funny animal"

and then a second image popped up in my head

what if they acted like dogs?

YEAAAAHHHHH HAPPY PUPPY SNAIL

[sanhaoche]

Sex is when you push your finger into someones open wound and they make a pathetic little moan in response

[sanhaoche]

Update I am 3000 words into writing my first ever fic & yes it is in the voice of Gary Barlow...........

📢📢 WHERE IS THE TAKE THAT OLD MAN YAOI???????????

[sanhaoche]

📢📢 WHERE IS THE TAKE THAT OLD MAN YAOI???????????

[sanhaoche]

Severance by Ling Ma, 2018 / Severance by Dan Erickson, 2022

[sanhaoche]

"You're already screwed up. Which is why you don't just want to work for me, you need to."

I Bet on Losing Dogs by Mitski // House M.D.

[sanhaoche]

Your closest experience to agitprop is Sesame Street. Your fatigue is so unearned, I can’t stand it.

x

[sanhaoche]

my thoughts are normal and appropriate

[sanhaoche]

I hate when some random bitch I don’t know has me blocked. What could I have possibly done. I am perfect in every way

[sanhaoche]

dts very much implying that gunther retired from F1 to go run a vineyard in the dolomites w the love of his life mattia binotto

[sanhaoche]

very classic of me to be not only 20 years late to house md but also a year late to the 2023 house revival......... the need to speak about dr robert chase is overwhelming me mind body and soul

[sanhaoche]

legitimately cannot explain how much House MD has eaten away at my brain over the past 5 days. what did they put in that show.

[sanhaoche]

Charles at the Fight Aids Cup 2024 // 23.01.24

[sanhaoche]

life update I've become consumed by hilary mantel's 1992 French revolution novel a place of greater safety & I am here with the message that fictionalised camille desmoulins is who you all WISH charles leclerc would be

[sanhaoche]

Rafa in an interview with EL PAÍS | English translation

[sanhaoche]

the reason it's necessary these days more than ever to interrogate allyship is because a lot of seemingly well-intentioned, liberal perspective these days is actually cruelty and faux concern masquerading as kindness.

it reminds me a lot of NGOization of palestine. a lot of good people work in NGOs in occupied palestine. they offer support to children, they provide basic psychological and cultural services, they allow pathways for palestinians to travel, they are overall positive influences.

but from a development perspective, the proliferation of NGOs and UN deposits in occupied palestine has been detrimental. many recognizes this very early on, before the oslo accords. it creates reliance and hobbles palestinian self-sufficiency. that's why israel allows it. it keeps palestinians suspended in a pseudo-state that can be withdrawn arbitrarily. even the UNRWA which has had 59(!!!) of its employees killed, cannot publicly state that it was israel who killed them.

in fact, in 2022 six palestinian NGOs that focused on advocacy, BDS, human rights, addressing the occupation itself and israeli crimes were were designated by israel as terrorist organizations and raided. the organizations, their donors and their activities are heavily monitored and controlled by the israeli state. israel often points to them as proof that it is a functioning democracy, that it allows plurality and kindness to palestinians.

are these organizations bad in and of themselves? well (apart from the corruption and siphoning of funds) absolutely not. the people working in them are brave and necessary. palestinian life would be worse off without them.

but these organizations cannot be separated from the conditions that allow them to exist. they are a by-product of israel's attempts to whither away palestinian self-determination, a temporary salve and a tool of the occupation. most people working there are aware that critiquing their existence is not critiquing their work. in an ideal world they would not be the only alternative to palestinian civil society.

the point is, beware the people who give charity but do not accept critiquing the conditions that force people to be dependent on charity in the first place.