rdthoughtdaughter

[rdthoughtdaughter]

LMAOOOOOOOO

.

[rdthoughtdaughter]

.

[rdthoughtdaughter]

If you refuse to analyse women’s actions for their value and ramifications, under a guise of its ‘empowerment’, you do not treat women like mature adults, humans.

You treat them like children.

Yes, I’m talking about choice feminism.

[rdthoughtdaughter]

I’m saying that you intentionally, pathetically infiltrate a community for a rage bait, yes.

While people like you shouldn’t get any modicum of attention, I thought it would be good to give you a reality check.

Hope it helps.

Gender-critical activists love claiming they’re “just protecting women’s rights” but here’s me, marked safe from their bad logic, baseless fear, and selective concern for women’s safety.

[rdthoughtdaughter]

https://www.collectiveshout.org/adolescents_most_common_perpetrators_of_child_sexual_abuse

New research finds adolescents most common perpetrators of child sexual abuse - Violent porn identified as a contributor

Adolescents are now the most common perpetrators of child sexual abuse, according to new Australian research published in the International Journal of Child Abuse and Neglect.

The study, Child sexual abuse by different classes and types of perpetrator: Prevalence and trends from an Australian national survey, found that while child sexual abuse by adult perpetrators has declined, child sexual abuse by adolescents has increased.

The study follows previous research documenting the rise in sexual offending by young men. In 2020, the Australian Bureau of Statistics found that males aged 15-19 had the highest rates of sexual assault offending of any age group.

[rdthoughtdaughter]

oh, so that’s what it is

(person who learned from childhood to make themself as small and unimportant as possible to avoid being a burden) yeah its okay we dont have to do my thing if you dont want i dont mind

[rdthoughtdaughter]

It’s about respect for the established rules. Sex separated spaces, like lavatory, were not checked thoroughly, and I personally haven’t seen this tendency unfolding anywhere. If you saw a lavatory room where in order to get into your allocated space you have to prove your genitals, do prove me wrong.

It’s a preventative measure. They exist for a reason. This space is recognised as vulnerable, especially so for women, who are the main victims of any sort of violence.

It doesn’t mean that all men are attackers. It means that with the comprehension of statistics, there is an undeniable possibility of an altercation, that is best to prevent before it even can happen.

The “genital checks” fantasy is so fucking weird to me because literally nobody, except TRAs apparently, want that or have ever proposed anything even remotely close to that. We want government identification to accurately reflect people’s sex and, most importantly, for males to respect that they aren’t welcome in women’s spaces. And TRAs truly cannot fathom the latter being a possibility. So much so that they imagine the only way to keep these males out of women’s spaces is to go as far as to check their genitals. They know how brazen and entitled these men are, they tell us as much, and somehow are still confused as to why we reject them. Then in the same breath they’ll talk about how being amongst men puts TIMs in danger. But, again, somehow can’t connect that it’s that same threat of male violence that makes women not want them in our spaces. Despite the fact that TIMs maintain male rates of criminality.

Though I take comfort in knowing that it’s exactly this kind of irrationality and reality denial that is destroying their movement.

[rdthoughtdaughter]

Something I’ve noticed about the rape, incest, and pedo games being removed are the people screaming about censorship are intentionally leaving out of their posts that it’s rape, incest, and pedo games

They keep being like “censorship of fiction you don’t like”

Well if it’s no big deal and shouldn’t be censored, then stop avoiding calling it what it is. If you’re going to defend these games, call them what they are instead of sugar coating your language around why they shouldn’t be taken down off the site

Is it because you know damn well you wouldn’t get as much support for your argument if you’re being 100% transparent about what you’re currently defending?

[rdthoughtdaughter]

Inhumane execution of a pregnant wife by her husband

Source: batyrjamal

In the village Balasaz in the Zhetysu region (Kazakhstan), a man tortured and killed his wife in front of their two-year-old daughter. According to relatives of Aizat Zhumanova, her husband, Aibar Zhanbolat, tied her hands with a rope to a horse saddle and dragged her across the steppe.

The man was detained, but the criminal case was not opened under the article "Murder," but rather "Intentional infliction of grievous bodily harm resulting in death by negligence." Aizat's relatives are outraged and are demanding that the case be reclassified.

The first person to report the murder of Aizat Zhumanova was journalist Sandugash Duisenova, who spoke with the girl's relatives and described the incident in detail on social media and in an article for Orda.kz.

According to Orda.kz, medical reports indicate that Aizat has broken almost all of her ribs, skull, fingers, spine, knees, and lower jaw, as well as abrasions, cuts, and lacerations all over her body. The list of injuries includes a closed head injury, concussion and swelling of the brain, a fracture of the base of the skull, and multiple fractures of the limbs and pelvis. There are marks on the body that indicate that the woman was dragged across a rough surface. According to Aizat's relatives, she was tied by her hands to a horse saddle with a rope and dragged across the steppe.

"Like in ancient execution rituals, they tied her up and dragged her until only a broken frame remained..." said the mother of the murdered woman, Saltanat Zhumanova.

The sisters of Aizat, who washed the body before the funeral, said that there was no skin left on her wrists—it had been torn down to the flesh:

"When we took off her clothes, we couldn't hold back our tears. Our mother fainted immediately.

There was not a single spot on her body that was intact.

Not a single one."

Aunt of Aizat, Raushan Daurenbekova, who worked as a paramedic for 30 years, said that her niece had been tortured: "Such injuries cannot be caused by a fall or a fight.

It looks like she was dragged along the ground.

And not for five minutes, but for hours."

The torture that Aizat endured is shocking enough, but that's not all: at the time of her murder, the woman was pregnant with her second child, and her two-year-old daughter witnessed her mother being tortured.

According to her relatives, the girl is in a state of deep shock and says nothing except one word:

"She doesn't speak, she just holds her head and whispers every morning: 'Mummy, mummy'. She is afraid of shadows and doesn't sleep at night. She saw everything, but she can't speak. She is the only silent witness."

In an interview with Channel One's Eurasia, relatives said that previously Aizat had never complained about her husband, and their family appeared happy and prosperous from the outside. However, neighbours now tell the woman’s relatives that her husband was quick-tempered and aggressive, and that she endured everything and kept silent.

According to Aizat's mother, she is particularly hurt by the fact that her son-in-law now says that he is not to blame for her daughter's death.

"If she had fallen and hit her head, I would have kept quiet. But injuries like these—I don't know. Whatever the case, I demand the truth. I want to see the truth with my own eyes. I don't want my daughter to have a bad reputation, but he won't admit it.

He says, 'It wasn't me.' All I want is for the investigation to be fair and for him to tell the truth," explained Saltanat Zhumanova.

Orda.kz shared the opinion of Aizat's relatives, who say that by the time the girl was brought to the hospital, she was already dead. Her relatives also claim that an attempt was made to cover up the crime, as she was changed and washed before being admitted to the hospital. In addition, according to her relatives, "Aizat's husband has a wealthy and influential family" — allegedly, this is why none of the neighbours reported the noise on the night of the murder: "they are all afraid." Meanwhile, her husband was intoxicated and behaved aggressively at the hospital. The police have already detained him.

There is more information about his spouse: the media found out that he recently ran for the position of mayor of the village of Kapal — election posters featuring Aibar Zhanbolat can still be found on social media.

It is also known that a criminal case was initiated under Article 106 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, "Intentional infliction of grievous bodily harm resulting in death by negligence." Orda.kz reported that Aizat's relatives are outraged and are demanding that the case be reclassified under the article

"Murder with particular cruelty":

"This was not 'negligent homicide', it was torture. Purposeful and methodical. And then — an attempt to cover up the traces.

He acted deliberately."

Source: batyr jamal

The murderer tries to claim that his wife died by falling from the window when she tried to make a selfie. Despite all of the evidence of the egregious crime that he committed. But now, after exerting his power on his partner that was weaker than him, he is being a coward. Classical.

Every day around the world women are getting killed. Be it a femicide, a murder by an intimate partner, or other type of murder.

In Kazakhstan, or other central Asian nations, it’s unfortunately very common. The news is filled with women killed brutally by their partners. And that’s the stories that are recognised, not silenced.

Don’t be silent about the fates of women. Share the word.

Justice to Aizat.

[rdthoughtdaughter]

How well worded.

[rdthoughtdaughter]

Thank you for responding, because I feel like I understood your position more, and I also agree with you on many things, if not all.

There must have been a misunderstanding. I was defensive against this post just because I saw a lot of posts made by black pill feminists where they just bash heterosexual women for being in relationships, saying that they are ‘stupid’, sharing pseudo articles about semen changing brain chemistry and so on. My line is attacks on women, so that’s it.

Separation is a great thing to come from Gemini and I agree with you that it shouldn’t be taken lightly, people should respect it, it’s real and important.

Thank you for being patient!

I don’t think you can be a radfem and have a boyfriend. I honestly think it’s selfish for you to claim to be a radfem and have a boyfriend, because honestly how dare you think you are capable of finding the only good one. How are you going to go on tumblr and talk all this talk about how men are socialized to be violent, and share statistics about rape and murder committed by men, and all of the horrors of men with access to porn, all while sleeping next to one? Do you seriously think you found the only good man? How far up your own ass do you have to be

This isn’t about anyone in particular, btw, so if you feel called out maybe keep it to yourself, thanks!

[rdthoughtdaughter]

You know that you are brilliant, right?

catch me standing outside the laser hair removal clinic with a sign and instead of a fetus it just has a weird picture of like sad cartoon hair follicles but still says “why would you do this to me…I can’t see you in heaven… 🥺” like those freaks outside planned parenthood…except my cause is noble and true and feminist listen to #me

[rdthoughtdaughter]

This is a deflection and a manipulation of facts. You are very much trying to imply, or well, you actually directly said that if you have a boyfriend you cannot be radical feminist. In truth, nothing in radical feminist theory indicates that those two are mutually exclusive.

What you demonstrated is a fatalistic, bio essential idea, where a particular sex, in this context male predetermines behaviour and personality. It implies that all men are innately monolithic, which is far from truth. The key problem recognised by radical feminism is patriarchy, which is a social system that is perpetuated through social means, like socialisations, traditions, customs, and so on. It is very successful and widespread, but it doesn’t make it natural.

This way, while the majority of men are successfully socialised in the way to support the patriarchy, reinforcing the inequality, it can be logically assumed that the opposite, more equal socialisation is possible. While it’s not as wide spread, unfortunately for us, yeah, shocker, it is possible for men to be decent and to be humans. By having this standard and upholding it, there can be an accountability, to begin with.

If you just say ‘nah, all men are irredeemable’, what is the purpose of it all? They are literally half of the planet.

There are a lot of heterosexual women. The stark amount of which are not in a healthy relationship, or equal one. We should remember about it, talk about it. However, it is not impossible for heterosexual women to form a partnership with men, come on. If there is somebody who can do it, it’s loud women, who are firm about their worth and boundaries. You found it? I will be cheering for you.

It’s very tempting to be unhinged online and on social media, but we need to remember the world we live in. I personally have no problem with women choosing to be alone, good for them. My choice has been to not engage in any kind of relationship, especially with men. I’m not looking for anybody, I just don’t want to do it in my state of mind, etc. But this is not about it. I can accept another woman, having another opinion and decision about her life. Especially when it is strong and nuanced, when she’s safe and in charge. You, on the other hand throw shade on them.

It’s a recurring conversation here. But it’s not radical feminist, I fear. It’s blackpill one.

I don’t think you can be a radfem and have a boyfriend. I honestly think it’s selfish for you to claim to be a radfem and have a boyfriend, because honestly how dare you think you are capable of finding the only good one. How are you going to go on tumblr and talk all this talk about how men are socialized to be violent, and share statistics about rape and murder committed by men, and all of the horrors of men with access to porn, all while sleeping next to one? Do you seriously think you found the only good man? How far up your own ass do you have to be

This isn’t about anyone in particular, btw, so if you feel called out maybe keep it to yourself, thanks!

[rdthoughtdaughter]

It’s a tad bit blackpill feminism, rather than radical

I don’t think you can be a radfem and have a boyfriend. I honestly think it’s selfish for you to claim to be a radfem and have a boyfriend, because honestly how dare you think you are capable of finding the only good one. How are you going to go on tumblr and talk all this talk about how men are socialized to be violent, and share statistics about rape and murder committed by men, and all of the horrors of men with access to porn, all while sleeping next to one? Do you seriously think you found the only good man? How far up your own ass do you have to be

This isn’t about anyone in particular, btw, so if you feel called out maybe keep it to yourself, thanks!

[rdthoughtdaughter]

"Safe Abortion for All.

No Compromise - No Apology"

Print by Bum Lung Press

[rdthoughtdaughter]

Each time this happens an angel loses its wings somewhere, I swear. A unicorn dies.

seeing fanart of female masculine characters with mastectomy scars I just don’t understand what goes on in your head. what about mutilating female body parts for no reason is sexy and intriguing and necessary to you

[rdthoughtdaughter]

If that version makes you sleep better at night 🤷‍♀️

Radfems will do anything to provide the bare minimum defense to any opposition