Text
6K notes
·
View notes
Text
I've been wanting to draw this for a long time, and I saw that this topic was raised in one community, and while I had the desire, I drew it in a hurry
Initially I thought that Rodney was just some kind of cat, red for example, or striped, But why not make him Siamese? The character is almost similar
I see Sheppard solely as a sheepdog. I still doubt about Ronon, but I still think that a Doberman is more or less suitable
God, haha, it's them. Only for the place of the dog, a cat
12 notes
·
View notes
Text
Ig it’s not a big loss for our movement, but it’s so funny to me how “gender critical” means someone who refuses to critique the normative assumptions about gender.
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
Megan talking about the reaction to W.A.P in her documentary
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
I'm late to the paleontology drama but my god this is so funny
170K notes
·
View notes
Text
226 notes
·
View notes
Photo
“Lighten Up” by Ronald Wimberly
Beautifuly written- and drawn.
468K notes
·
View notes
Text
6K notes
·
View notes
Text
I think it's important to remember, as a rule of thumb, if you take advantage of a social service, it actually makes it easier for other people who need that service to access it. Most of the time, when these services get cut, it's because politicians will look at usage and say "see, no one is really using this thing, we can afford to trim the budget for food stamps by at least half". Whereas if you decide to step up and use these programs, even if you feel like you "don't really need it", at bare minimum it's another data point advocates can use to say "hey, look, people are using this thing, this is an important service we are providing, do not cut our funding".
96K notes
·
View notes
Text
So there's something I want to say re: intentionally withholding your vote, and I want to do it without coming across as condescending or dismissive.
I've worked as a field organizer in two campaigns, 2010 and 2012, and my job was to help turnout the vote for Democratic candidates up and down the ticket. Technology may have changed, but people are still knocking on doors for specific voters the way they were 12 years ago.
If you say you're not voting/voting 3rd party, the campaign volunteer is supposed to mark that and move on. Their job, in the final month of the election, is to make sure the campaign's supporters have all the information and resources they need to cast a vote.
They aren't collecting data on why you're withholding your vote. They aren't submitting opinion polling results to the campaign. Something like 155 million people voted in the 2020 election, and if you say you're not voting, the campaign is not going to waste a volunteer's time and morale begging you to vote when there are literally millions of other voters to turn out.
Let me repeat that: The campaign does not track why you're not voting. They simply note your vote is not a priority for turnout and move on.
I say this because I see a lot of promotion of non-voting like that's a boycott, when the function is not the same. A boycott is a coordinated mass refusal to engage with an institution—which sounds similar if you see a vote as a good or service to withhold. Unfortunately, it's not.
A vote is a choice you're making as part of a community hiring committee. Your abstention doesn't prevent someone from being hired. It just lowers the threshold for the worst candidate to succeed.
All this to say: In my direct experience as an organizer, abstaining from the vote sends a message. That message is not "You need to try harder to win my vote." It's "Don't waste time on me."
20K notes
·
View notes
Text
"depiction is not automatically glorification" can and should coexist with "some depiction is glorification and you need to be able to tell the difference"
97K notes
·
View notes
Text
YOUNG MAN!
There's no need to feel down,
I MEAN YOUNG THEY!
I forgot your pronoun,
146K notes
·
View notes
Text
I think a lot of what makes fanfiction so magical is writers taking the time to explore tiny elements that were imagined into existence in the source material and then abandoned. It's the deep dive into that t-shirt, the forgotten gift, the nickname, the spare key, the anger they swallowed down, the trauma they supressed, the love they denied, the story that wasn't mainstream enough to make it. It's the little things getting their moment to shine and I fucking love that and I will fight for it always.
5K notes
·
View notes
Text
"this made me question my sexuality" except on this hellsite it's always gays begining to suspect they might be bisexual
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
the idea that restrooms, locker rooms, etc need to be single-sex spaces in order for women to be safe is patriarchy's way of signalling to men & boys that society doesn't expect them to behave themselves around women. it is directly antifeminist. it would be antifeminist even if trans people did not exist. a feminist society would demand that women should be safe in all spaces even when there are men there.
98K notes
·
View notes