loadbearingbutch

[loadbearingbutch]

[loadbearingbutch]

I deman you to do it ?

[loadbearingbutch]

Worse still, even if we had the ability to take a snapshot of all of the brain’s 86 billion neurons and then to simulate the state of those neurons in a computer, that vast pattern would mean nothing outside the body of the brain that produced it. This is perhaps the most egregious way in which the IP metaphor has distorted our thinking about human functioning. Whereas computers do store exact copies of data – copies that can persist unchanged for long periods of time, even if the power has been turned off – the brain maintains our intellect only as long as it remains alive. There is no on-off switch. Either the brain keeps functioning, or we disappear. What’s more, as the neurobiologist Steven Rose pointed out in The Future of the Brain (2005), a snapshot of the brain’s current state might also be meaningless unless we knew the entire life history of that brain’s owner – perhaps even about the social context in which he or she was raised.

Think how difficult this problem is. To understand even the basics of how the brain maintains the human intellect, we might need to know not just the current state of all 86 billion neurons and their 100 trillion interconnections, not just the varying strengths with which they are connected, and not just the states of more than 1,000 proteins that exist at each connection point, but how the moment-to-moment activity of the brain contributes to the integrity of the system. Add to this the uniqueness of each brain, brought about in part because of the uniqueness of each person’s life history, and Kandel’s prediction starts to sound overly optimistic. (In a recent op-ed in The New York Times, the neuroscientist Kenneth Miller suggested it will take ‘centuries’ just to figure out basic neuronal connectivity.)

Meanwhile, vast sums of money are being raised for brain research, based in some cases on faulty ideas and promises that cannot be kept. The most blatant instance of neuroscience gone awry, documented recently in a report in Scientific American, concerns the $1.3 billion Human Brain Project launched by the European Union in 2013. Convinced by the charismatic Henry Markram that he could create a simulation of the entire human brain on a supercomputer by the year 2023, and that such a model would revolutionise the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and other disorders, EU officials funded his project with virtually no restrictions. Less than two years into it, the project turned into a ‘brain wreck’, and Markram was asked to step down.

[loadbearingbutch]

green's my colour.

[loadbearingbutch]

How many people do you think have lezzed out in Antarctica

[loadbearingbutch]

Quitting my job to devote my life to bathing and going on walks

[loadbearingbutch]

literally waiting for it to pass so i can start using my heart's full potential again oh my goodness..

[loadbearingbutch]

[loadbearingbutch]

Dude I was talking to spongebob he doesnt fuck with you no more

[loadbearingbutch]

anyone remember when the combination kfc/long john silvers in my hometown just fucking exploded one night

[loadbearingbutch]

[loadbearingbutch]

This tweet snaps against my mind like a rubber band whenever I start idling a little too long in the land of my frivolous doldrums… it’s my version of that Jemima Kirke “you all think about yourselves too much” screenshot

[loadbearingbutch]

Why is there no man arching his back with his butt in the air emoji

[loadbearingbutch]

[loadbearingbutch]

me in the spring sun

[loadbearingbutch]

[loadbearingbutch]

just mad it wasn’t me going to hell for him