Wanna know a fun fact about me? I overthink things, and take long doing stuff xDAmazing pfp by @thisislifenao!!!
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
A little warning to anyone only perceiving in three dimensions, this mashup is a bit of a doozy
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
503K notes
·
View notes
Text
Edge of Midnight Episode 3 Oopsie that took me tf out - a wonderful surprise amongst the horror with a cameo from Gricko and Frost
333 notes
·
View notes
Text
List of media where the title is significantly more accurate than you expect going in:
- Jojo's Bizarre Adventure
- Everything Everywhere All At Once
- The Thing
45K notes
·
View notes
Text
seeing a lot of radfem rhetoric in the wake of this election so here’s a reminder that yes absolutely misogyny played a massive part in this election and trump did not win Because Of MenTM. he won because the political right in this country, including women, have been radicalized to the point of accepting or actively advocating for white supremacy and fascism.
there is a difference between 54% and 44% yes, but not as big as a lot of this rhetoric is trying to infer. lashing out at the men in your life or random men you see is not going to help. driving men to suicide is not going to help. not dating or sleeping with men is not going to help.
the problem is not solely misogyny. the problem is not MenTM. the problem is fascism. do not let people convince you otherwise.
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
I do want to note that the whole "women are allowed to dress masculine and wear trousers" thing needs to be viewed in its historical context:
People fought for generations to be allowed to dress that way. They fought hard to be allowed to wear pants. Blue jeans were a symbol of feminist revolution. Women were barred from workplaces and schools for wearing them.
This is not some a natural fact that women dressing masculine is less shocking and humiliating. That normalization was fought for and hard-won.
And yet so many people erase the struggles of those people who fought to make that happen and pretend that it's just normal and natural that people don't see women "dressed like men" as ridiculous.
The Marriage of Figaro has what's called a "breeches role" which is a woman wearing men's clothes playing am ale role. This was done partly due to the vocal range requirements, but in many cases it was done comedically. It was risque and sexualized or comic relief that a woman was dressed as a man.
Anti-suffragette posters mock women wearing pants - well they were bloomers and split skirts back then - and mocking more masculine cut styles of clothes. This was meant to portray this as ridiculous.
They mocked the "new woman" in Weimar Germany, lamenting that they were too masculine.
This is a political cartoon from the 1920s depicting a woman in masculine dress deciding which bathroom to use:
Sorry but you're erasing these struggles and flattening history when you say this shit.
Women were killed and institutionalized in the struggle to make this happen. It really fucking bothers me the way it's framed as "people just don't find it as weird when women dress masculine."
Yes they fucking did. Until women and transmasculine people fought for their right to wear what they want. It's normalized because people struggled to normalize it.
And it's not normal everywhere. There are many countries where it's still illegal for women to wear pants. Sudan, Saudi Arabia.
Even in the US, it's forbidden and considered ridiculous in groups like the FLDS, the Amish, and the Hutterites.
We are flattening and erasing the struggles of women when we say these things. I know we're trying to build theory here but you can't build solid theory on a foundation of lies.
8K notes
·
View notes
Text
“it sounds like you’re justifying their actions-“ i am. they’re a fictional character. i’m okay with anything they do all the time. hope this helps.
35K notes
·
View notes
Text
oh please let me on this map please I won't do anything bad I promise I can be trusted near the hay goat
2K notes
·
View notes
Video
98K notes
·
View notes
Text
still don’t get that a lot of modern psychological horror is “what if you did EVIL THING . But you Didn t Know.” When the scary part is knowing full well what you’ve done and living with it and processing it in unhealthy ways that reflect the twistedness that brought you to do the evil act in the first place! This post made by Jekyll and Hyde enjoyer gang
144 notes
·
View notes
Photo
452K notes
·
View notes
Text
why is mr utterson is described as boring like is he not the funniest character in the novel
76 notes
·
View notes
Text
Great news! Belgium today becomes the first country in the world where sex workers can sign a legal employment contract and gain access to all employment-dependent social security (which includes saving for a pension, paid pregnancy leave, paid sick leave etc.). It gives sex workers more rights and makes them less dependent on the goodwill of their employer because they now have state protection through a legal contract.
19K notes
·
View notes
Text
hmmm.. possibly life dooming decisions, we love them
404 notes
·
View notes
Text
I love this book to death, so here's some things I noticed <3
2K notes
·
View notes